In Practice Evaluation of a Denture Adhesive Using a Gnathometer
Identifieur interne : 003300 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 003299; suivant : 003301In Practice Evaluation of a Denture Adhesive Using a Gnathometer
Auteurs : Jason J. Psillakis ; Robert F. Wright ; John T. Grbic ; Ira B. LamsterSource :
- Journal of Prosthodontics [ 1059-941X ] ; 2004-12.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adhesive, Complete denture, Complete denture patients, Dent, Denture, Denture adhesives, Denture dislodgement, Denture performance, Denture retention, Denture wearers, Dislodgement, Gnathometer, Mandibular, Maxillary, Natural teeth, Partial denture, Practice evaluation, Procter gamble, Prosthesis, Prosthet, Prosthet dent, Wearer.
- Teeft :
- Adhesive, Complete denture, Complete denture patients, Dent, Denture, Denture adhesives, Denture dislodgement, Denture performance, Denture retention, Denture wearers, Dislodgement, Gnathometer, Mandibular, Maxillary, Natural teeth, Partial denture, Practice evaluation, Procter gamble, Prosthesis, Prosthet, Prosthet dent, Wearer.
Abstract
Purpose: This study measured the extent to which the performance of a maxillary complete denture can be improved with the use of a denture adhesive. This in‐practice evaluation assessed both a quantitative measure (force until dislodgement), without and with the adhesive, and patients' perception regarding the use of adhesive. Materials and Methods: A total of 194 patients (77 men, 117 women) who wore maxillary complete dentures were tested for denture performance both without and with denture adhesive. A simple gnathometer was used. Patient perceptions were also assessed by a questionnaire and analyzed for denture performance as well as the effects on speaking and chewing, fit and comfort, and perceived confidence. Results: There was a 63.4% improvement in bite force dislodgement with the use of a denture adhesive. A total of 79.2% of the patients perceived better denture performance (bite force dislodgement) with adhesive use. A total of 55.7% perceived an improvement in speaking and chewing. A total of 56.2% noticed the fit and comfort were better. A total of 63.9% responded that they had improved confidence. Conclusions: Use of a denture adhesive can improve the incisal (or protrusive) biting force for patients who wear a maxillary complete denture. Subjectively, the patients reported an improved perception of denture performance and that the use of adhesive provided greater confidence when using the prosthesis.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04040.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:674FB429903B2EEF53D1B38B4CE05CE99F46843DLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">In Practice Evaluation of a Denture Adhesive Using a Gnathometer</title><author><name sortKey="Psillakis, Jason J" sort="Psillakis, Jason J" uniqKey="Psillakis J" first="Jason J." last="Psillakis">Jason J. Psillakis</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Assistant Professor of Clinical Dentistry (Prosthodontics).</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wright, Robert F" sort="Wright, Robert F" uniqKey="Wright R" first="Robert F." last="Wright">Robert F. Wright</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Professor of Clinical Dentistry (Prosthodontics); Director, Division of Prosthodontics.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Grbic, John T" sort="Grbic, John T" uniqKey="Grbic J" first="John T." last="Grbic">John T. Grbic</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Associate Professor and Director, Division of Oral Biology.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lamster, Ira B" sort="Lamster, Ira B" uniqKey="Lamster I" first="Ira B." last="Lamster">Ira B. Lamster</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dean.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:674FB429903B2EEF53D1B38B4CE05CE99F46843D</idno><date when="2004" year="2004">2004</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04040.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/674FB429903B2EEF53D1B38B4CE05CE99F46843D/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003300</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003300</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">In Practice Evaluation of a Denture Adhesive Using a Gnathometer</title><author><name sortKey="Psillakis, Jason J" sort="Psillakis, Jason J" uniqKey="Psillakis J" first="Jason J." last="Psillakis">Jason J. Psillakis</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Assistant Professor of Clinical Dentistry (Prosthodontics).</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wright, Robert F" sort="Wright, Robert F" uniqKey="Wright R" first="Robert F." last="Wright">Robert F. Wright</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Professor of Clinical Dentistry (Prosthodontics); Director, Division of Prosthodontics.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Grbic, John T" sort="Grbic, John T" uniqKey="Grbic J" first="John T." last="Grbic">John T. Grbic</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Associate Professor and Director, Division of Oral Biology.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lamster, Ira B" sort="Lamster, Ira B" uniqKey="Lamster I" first="Ira B." last="Lamster">Ira B. Lamster</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dean.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Prosthodontics</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS</title><idno type="ISSN">1059-941X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1532-849X</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">13</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="244">244</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="250">250</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><pubPlace> 350 Main Street , Malden , MA 02148‐5020 , USA , and PO Box 1354, 9600 Garsington Road , Oxford OX4 2XG , England . </pubPlace><date type="published" when="2004-12">2004-12</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1059-941X</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1059-941X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adhesive</term><term>Complete denture</term><term>Complete denture patients</term><term>Dent</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture adhesives</term><term>Denture dislodgement</term><term>Denture performance</term><term>Denture retention</term><term>Denture wearers</term><term>Dislodgement</term><term>Gnathometer</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Partial denture</term><term>Practice evaluation</term><term>Procter gamble</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthet</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Wearer</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Adhesive</term><term>Complete denture</term><term>Complete denture patients</term><term>Dent</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture adhesives</term><term>Denture dislodgement</term><term>Denture performance</term><term>Denture retention</term><term>Denture wearers</term><term>Dislodgement</term><term>Gnathometer</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Partial denture</term><term>Practice evaluation</term><term>Procter gamble</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthet</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Wearer</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Purpose: This study measured the extent to which the performance of a maxillary complete denture can be improved with the use of a denture adhesive. This in‐practice evaluation assessed both a quantitative measure (force until dislodgement), without and with the adhesive, and patients' perception regarding the use of adhesive. Materials and Methods: A total of 194 patients (77 men, 117 women) who wore maxillary complete dentures were tested for denture performance both without and with denture adhesive. A simple gnathometer was used. Patient perceptions were also assessed by a questionnaire and analyzed for denture performance as well as the effects on speaking and chewing, fit and comfort, and perceived confidence. Results: There was a 63.4% improvement in bite force dislodgement with the use of a denture adhesive. A total of 79.2% of the patients perceived better denture performance (bite force dislodgement) with adhesive use. A total of 55.7% perceived an improvement in speaking and chewing. A total of 56.2% noticed the fit and comfort were better. A total of 63.9% responded that they had improved confidence. Conclusions: Use of a denture adhesive can improve the incisal (or protrusive) biting force for patients who wear a maxillary complete denture. Subjectively, the patients reported an improved perception of denture performance and that the use of adhesive provided greater confidence when using the prosthesis.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>maxillary</json:string><json:string>dislodgement</json:string><json:string>gnathometer</json:string><json:string>denture adhesives</json:string><json:string>complete denture</json:string><json:string>wearer</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>denture wearers</json:string><json:string>prosthet</json:string><json:string>denture performance</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>prosthet dent</json:string><json:string>adhesive</json:string><json:string>denture retention</json:string><json:string>natural teeth</json:string><json:string>practice evaluation</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>procter gamble</json:string><json:string>denture dislodgement</json:string><json:string>partial denture</json:string><json:string>complete denture patients</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Jason J. Psillakis DDS, MS</name><affiliations><json:string>Assistant Professor of Clinical Dentistry (Prosthodontics).</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Robert F. Wright DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Professor of Clinical Dentistry (Prosthodontics); Director, Division of Prosthodontics.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>John T. Grbic DMD, MS, MMSc</name><affiliations><json:string>Associate Professor and Director, Division of Oral Biology.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Ira B. Lamster DDS, MMSc</name><affiliations><json:string>Dean.</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>stress distribution</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>photoelastic analysis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>occlusion</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JOPR4040</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-FGQFD7M1-V</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Purpose: This study measured the extent to which the performance of a maxillary complete denture can be improved with the use of a denture adhesive. This in‐practice evaluation assessed both a quantitative measure (force until dislodgement), without and with the adhesive, and patients' perception regarding the use of adhesive. Materials and Methods: A total of 194 patients (77 men, 117 women) who wore maxillary complete dentures were tested for denture performance both without and with denture adhesive. A simple gnathometer was used. Patient perceptions were also assessed by a questionnaire and analyzed for denture performance as well as the effects on speaking and chewing, fit and comfort, and perceived confidence. Results: There was a 63.4% improvement in bite force dislodgement with the use of a denture adhesive. A total of 79.2% of the patients perceived better denture performance (bite force dislodgement) with adhesive use. A total of 55.7% perceived an improvement in speaking and chewing. A total of 56.2% noticed the fit and comfort were better. A total of 63.9% responded that they had improved confidence. Conclusions: Use of a denture adhesive can improve the incisal (or protrusive) biting force for patients who wear a maxillary complete denture. Subjectively, the patients reported an improved perception of denture performance and that the use of adhesive provided greater confidence when using the prosthesis.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.58</score><pdfWordCount>2928</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>18570</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>594 x 779 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>221</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1439</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>3</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>In Practice Evaluation of a Denture Adhesive Using a Gnathometer</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Prosthodontics</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1532-849X</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1059-941X</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1532-849X</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JOPR</json:string></publisherId><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><pages><first>244</first><last>250</last><total>7</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1940</json:string><json:string>2004</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Columbia University</json:string><json:string>Division of Oral Biology</json:string><json:string>Division of Prosthodontics</json:string><json:string>American College of Prosthodontists</json:string><json:string>Procter</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder><json:string>Procter</json:string></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Ira B. Lamster</json:string><json:string>Research</json:string><json:string>Professor</json:string><json:string>Used</json:string><json:string>Jason J. Psillakis</json:string><json:string>Robert F. Wright</json:string><json:string>John T. Grbic</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>NY.</json:string><json:string>NY</json:string><json:string>Cincinnati</json:string><json:string>York</json:string><json:string>OH</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Psillakis et al</json:string><json:string>Zarb et al</json:string><json:string>Chew et al</json:string><json:string>MacKay et al</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-FGQFD7M1-V</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2004</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2004</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04040.x</json:string></doi><id>674FB429903B2EEF53D1B38B4CE05CE99F46843D</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/674FB429903B2EEF53D1B38B4CE05CE99F46843D/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/674FB429903B2EEF53D1B38B4CE05CE99F46843D/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/674FB429903B2EEF53D1B38B4CE05CE99F46843D/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">In Practice Evaluation of a Denture Adhesive Using a Gnathometer</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><pubPlace> 350 Main Street , Malden , MA 02148‐5020 , USA , and PO Box 1354, 9600 Garsington Road , Oxford OX4 2XG , England . </pubPlace><date type="published" when="2004-12"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">In Practice Evaluation of a Denture Adhesive Using a Gnathometer</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Jason J.</forename><surname>Psillakis</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, MS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Assistant Professor of Clinical Dentistry (Prosthodontics).</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Robert F.</forename><surname>Wright</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Professor of Clinical Dentistry (Prosthodontics); Director, Division of Prosthodontics.</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">John T.</forename><surname>Grbic</surname><roleName type="degree">DMD, MS, MMSc</roleName></persName><affiliation>Associate Professor and Director, Division of Oral Biology.</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Ira B.</forename><surname>Lamster</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, MMSc</roleName></persName><affiliation>Dean.</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">674FB429903B2EEF53D1B38B4CE05CE99F46843D</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-FGQFD7M1-V</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04040.x</idno><idno type="unit">JOPR4040</idno><idno type="supplier">jopr4040</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JOPR.JOPR4040.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Prosthodontics</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS</title><idno type="pISSN">1059-941X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1532-849X</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1532-849X</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/jopr.2004.13.issue-4</idno><idno type="product">JOPR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">13</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="244">244</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="250">250</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><pubPlace> 350 Main Street , Malden , MA 02148‐5020 , USA , and PO Box 1354, 9600 Garsington Road , Oxford OX4 2XG , England . </pubPlace><date type="published" when="2004-12"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p>
<hi rend="italic"><emph><span>Purpose:</span></emph></hi> This study measured the extent to which the performance of a maxillary complete denture can be improved with the use of a denture adhesive. This in‐practice evaluation assessed both a quantitative measure (force until dislodgement), without and with the adhesive, and patients' perception regarding the use of adhesive.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic"><emph><span>Materials and Methods:</span></emph></hi> A total of 194 patients (77 men, 117 women) who wore maxillary complete dentures were tested for denture performance both without and with denture adhesive. A simple gnathometer was used. Patient perceptions were also assessed by a questionnaire and analyzed for denture performance as well as the effects on speaking and chewing, fit and comfort, and perceived confidence.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic"><emph><span>Results:</span></emph></hi> There was a 63.4% improvement in bite force dislodgement with the use of a denture adhesive. A total of 79.2% of the patients perceived better denture performance (bite force dislodgement) with adhesive use. A total of 55.7% perceived an improvement in speaking and chewing. A total of 56.2% noticed the fit and comfort were better. A total of 63.9% responded that they had improved confidence.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic"><emph><span>Conclusions:</span></emph></hi> Use of a denture adhesive can improve the incisal (or protrusive) biting force for patients who wear a maxillary complete denture. Subjectively, the patients reported an improved perception of denture performance and that the use of adhesive provided greater confidence when using the prosthesis.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">stress distribution</term><term xml:id="k2">photoelastic analysis</term><term xml:id="k3">occlusion</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Clinical Research</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/674FB429903B2EEF53D1B38B4CE05CE99F46843D/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc> 350 Main Street , Malden , MA 02148‐5020 , USA , and PO Box 1354, 9600 Garsington Road , Oxford OX4 2XG , England . </publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1532-849X</doi><issn type="print">1059-941X</issn><issn type="electronic">1532-849X</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JOPR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS">Journal of Prosthodontics</title><title type="subtitle">Implant, Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="12004"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jopr.2004.13.issue-4</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="13">13</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="4">4</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2004-12">December 2004</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="7" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04040.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JOPR4040"></id><id type="supplier" value="jopr4040"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="7"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1"><sc>Clinical Research</sc></title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2004-12-10"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2004-12-10"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.4 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-30"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-31"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-30"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="244">244</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="250">250</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo> Jason J. Psillakis, DDS, MS, Columbia University, School of Dental and Oral Surgery, PH 7 East‐Room 115, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032. E‐mail: <email>jpsillakis@yahoo.com</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JOPR.JOPR4040.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted April 1, 2004.</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="5"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="3"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="19"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="37"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">In Practice Evaluation of a Denture Adhesive Using a Gnathometer</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Jason J.</givenNames><familyName>Psillakis</familyName><degrees>DDS, MS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Robert F.</givenNames><familyName>Wright</familyName><degrees>DDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>John T.</givenNames><familyName>Grbic</familyName><degrees>DMD, MS, MMSc</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a4"><personName><givenNames>Ira B.</givenNames><familyName>Lamster</familyName><degrees>DDS, MMSc</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Assistant Professor of Clinical Dentistry (Prosthodontics).</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2"><unparsedAffiliation>Professor of Clinical Dentistry (Prosthodontics); Director, Division of Prosthodontics.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3"><unparsedAffiliation>Associate Professor and Director, Division of Oral Biology.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4"><unparsedAffiliation>Dean.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">stress distribution</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">photoelastic analysis</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">occlusion</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p> <i><span cssStyle="text-decoration:underline">Purpose:</span></i> This study measured the extent to which the performance of a maxillary complete denture can be improved with the use of a denture adhesive. This in‐practice evaluation assessed both a quantitative measure (force until dislodgement), without and with the adhesive, and patients' perception regarding the use of adhesive.</p><p> <i><span cssStyle="text-decoration:underline">Materials and Methods:</span></i> A total of 194 patients (77 men, 117 women) who wore maxillary complete dentures were tested for denture performance both without and with denture adhesive. A simple gnathometer was used. Patient perceptions were also assessed by a questionnaire and analyzed for denture performance as well as the effects on speaking and chewing, fit and comfort, and perceived confidence.</p><p> <i><span cssStyle="text-decoration:underline">Results:</span></i> There was a 63.4% improvement in bite force dislodgement with the use of a denture adhesive. A total of 79.2% of the patients perceived better denture performance (bite force dislodgement) with adhesive use. A total of 55.7% perceived an improvement in speaking and chewing. A total of 56.2% noticed the fit and comfort were better. A total of 63.9% responded that they had improved confidence.</p><p> <i><span cssStyle="text-decoration:underline">Conclusions:</span></i> Use of a denture adhesive can improve the incisal (or protrusive) biting force for patients who wear a maxillary complete denture. Subjectively, the patients reported an improved perception of denture performance and that the use of adhesive provided greater confidence when using the prosthesis.</p><!--
J Prosthodont 2004;13:244-250. Copyright © 2004 by The American College of Prosthodontists.
--></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>In Practice Evaluation of a Denture Adhesive Using a Gnathometer</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>In Practice Evaluation of a Denture Adhesive Using a Gnathometer</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Jason J.</namePart><namePart type="family">Psillakis</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MS</namePart><affiliation>Assistant Professor of Clinical Dentistry (Prosthodontics).</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Robert F.</namePart><namePart type="family">Wright</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>Professor of Clinical Dentistry (Prosthodontics); Director, Division of Prosthodontics.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">John T.</namePart><namePart type="family">Grbic</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DMD, MS, MMSc</namePart><affiliation>Associate Professor and Director, Division of Oral Biology.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Ira B.</namePart><namePart type="family">Lamster</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MMSc</namePart><affiliation>Dean.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">350 Main Street , Malden , MA 02148‐5020 , USA , and PO Box 1354, 9600 Garsington Road , Oxford OX4 2XG , England .</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2004-12</dateIssued><edition>Accepted April 1, 2004.</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2004</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">5</extent><extent unit="tables">3</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">19</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">37</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Purpose: This study measured the extent to which the performance of a maxillary complete denture can be improved with the use of a denture adhesive. This in‐practice evaluation assessed both a quantitative measure (force until dislodgement), without and with the adhesive, and patients' perception regarding the use of adhesive. Materials and Methods: A total of 194 patients (77 men, 117 women) who wore maxillary complete dentures were tested for denture performance both without and with denture adhesive. A simple gnathometer was used. Patient perceptions were also assessed by a questionnaire and analyzed for denture performance as well as the effects on speaking and chewing, fit and comfort, and perceived confidence. Results: There was a 63.4% improvement in bite force dislodgement with the use of a denture adhesive. A total of 79.2% of the patients perceived better denture performance (bite force dislodgement) with adhesive use. A total of 55.7% perceived an improvement in speaking and chewing. A total of 56.2% noticed the fit and comfort were better. A total of 63.9% responded that they had improved confidence. Conclusions: Use of a denture adhesive can improve the incisal (or protrusive) biting force for patients who wear a maxillary complete denture. Subjectively, the patients reported an improved perception of denture performance and that the use of adhesive provided greater confidence when using the prosthesis.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>stress distribution</topic><topic>photoelastic analysis</topic><topic>occlusion</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Prosthodontics</title><subTitle>Implant, Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry</subTitle></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1059-941X</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1532-849X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1532-849X</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JOPR</identifier><part><date>2004</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>13</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>244</start><end>250</end><total>7</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">674FB429903B2EEF53D1B38B4CE05CE99F46843D</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-FGQFD7M1-V</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04040.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JOPR4040</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Science Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/674FB429903B2EEF53D1B38B4CE05CE99F46843D/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003300 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003300 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:674FB429903B2EEF53D1B38B4CE05CE99F46843D
|texte= In Practice Evaluation of a Denture Adhesive Using a Gnathometer
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |