The United Nations and Human Development: From Ideology to Global Policies
Identifieur interne : 003234 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 003233; suivant : 003235The United Nations and Human Development: From Ideology to Global Policies
Auteurs : Jean-Philippe ThérienSource :
- Global Policy [ 1758-5880 ] ; 2012-02.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Accra agenda, Analytical framework, Annan, Bretton woods institutions, Civil society, Climate change, Climate change mitigation, Climate system, Credible critique, Cultural systems, Current state, Democracy promotion, Democratic governance, Development agenda, Development ideology, Development policies, Economic crisis, Economic growth, Election monitoring, Electoral assistance, February, General assembly resolution, Global, Global climate change, Global climate change policy, Global governance, Global partnership, Global policies, Global policy, Global warming, Good governance, Governance, Governance assessments, Great extent, History project, Http, Hulme, Human activity, Human development, Human development approach, Human development concept, Human development ideology, Human development report, Human development reports, Human dimension, Human rights, Human settlements, Indiana university press, Inequality, International action, International community, International consensus, International cooperation, International efforts, International negotiations, International order, Ipcc, John wiley sons, Kyoto protocol, London school, Mainstream development, Mdgs, Millennium, Millennium campaign, Millennium development goals, Millennium project, Nations department, Nations development programme, Nations framework convention, Nations millennium declaration, Nations university press, Normative force, Oecd, Oecd countries, Online, Other hand, Overseas development institute, Oxford university press, Paris declaration, Participatory development, Political dimension, Political ideas, Political science, Political theory, Poor countries, Poverty reduction, Public information, Real wealth, Real world, Recent years, Rich countries, Same time, Second section, Social development, Social forces, Social integration, Social life, Specialized agencies, Sustainable, Sustainable development, Task force, Undp, Undp approach, Undp document, Unfccc, Washington consensus.
- Teeft :
- Accra agenda, Analytical framework, Annan, Bretton woods institutions, Civil society, Climate change, Climate change mitigation, Climate system, Credible critique, Cultural systems, Current state, Democracy promotion, Democratic governance, Development agenda, Development ideology, Development policies, Economic crisis, Economic growth, Election monitoring, Electoral assistance, February, General assembly resolution, Global, Global climate change, Global climate change policy, Global governance, Global partnership, Global policies, Global policy, Global warming, Good governance, Governance, Governance assessments, Great extent, History project, Http, Hulme, Human activity, Human development, Human development approach, Human development concept, Human development ideology, Human development report, Human development reports, Human dimension, Human rights, Human settlements, Indiana university press, Inequality, International action, International community, International consensus, International cooperation, International efforts, International negotiations, International order, Ipcc, John wiley sons, Kyoto protocol, London school, Mainstream development, Mdgs, Millennium, Millennium campaign, Millennium development goals, Millennium project, Nations department, Nations development programme, Nations framework convention, Nations millennium declaration, Nations university press, Normative force, Oecd, Oecd countries, Online, Other hand, Overseas development institute, Oxford university press, Paris declaration, Participatory development, Political dimension, Political ideas, Political science, Political theory, Poor countries, Poverty reduction, Public information, Real wealth, Real world, Recent years, Rich countries, Same time, Second section, Social development, Social forces, Social integration, Social life, Specialized agencies, Sustainable, Sustainable development, Task force, Undp, Undp approach, Undp document, Unfccc, Washington consensus.
Abstract
Building on the work of the United Nations Intellectual History Project, this article argues that the ideology of human development has now become the driving normative force behind the global policies supported by the UN in the area of development. The first part focuses on the UN’s official discourse of the past two decades, and shows how it has been influenced by the concept of human development. The second section examines a set of global policies that illustrate how the UN has sought to put the principles of human development into practice. The article concludes that while human development ideology has represented for twenty years the most credible critique of mainstream development policies, its impact – like that of the UN in world affairs – remains nonetheless limited.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00147.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:661DC71EC70B183149A5F54C03E361D3083C4A08Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The United Nations and Human Development: From Ideology to Global Policies</title><author><name sortKey="Therien, Jean Hilippe" sort="Therien, Jean Hilippe" uniqKey="Therien J" first="Jean-Philippe" last="Thérien">Jean-Philippe Thérien</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Université de Montréal</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:661DC71EC70B183149A5F54C03E361D3083C4A08</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00147.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/661DC71EC70B183149A5F54C03E361D3083C4A08/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003234</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003234</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The United Nations and Human Development: From Ideology to Global Policies</title><author><name sortKey="Therien, Jean Hilippe" sort="Therien, Jean Hilippe" uniqKey="Therien J" first="Jean-Philippe" last="Thérien">Jean-Philippe Thérien</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Université de Montréal</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Global Policy</title><title level="j" type="alt">GLOBAL POLICY</title><idno type="ISSN">1758-5880</idno><idno type="eISSN">1758-5899</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="12">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">12</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-02">2012-02</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1758-5880</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1758-5880</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Accra agenda</term><term>Analytical framework</term><term>Annan</term><term>Bretton woods institutions</term><term>Civil society</term><term>Climate change</term><term>Climate change mitigation</term><term>Climate system</term><term>Credible critique</term><term>Cultural systems</term><term>Current state</term><term>Democracy promotion</term><term>Democratic governance</term><term>Development agenda</term><term>Development ideology</term><term>Development policies</term><term>Economic crisis</term><term>Economic growth</term><term>Election monitoring</term><term>Electoral assistance</term><term>February</term><term>General assembly resolution</term><term>Global</term><term>Global climate change</term><term>Global climate change policy</term><term>Global governance</term><term>Global partnership</term><term>Global policies</term><term>Global policy</term><term>Global warming</term><term>Good governance</term><term>Governance</term><term>Governance assessments</term><term>Great extent</term><term>History project</term><term>Http</term><term>Hulme</term><term>Human activity</term><term>Human development</term><term>Human development approach</term><term>Human development concept</term><term>Human development ideology</term><term>Human development report</term><term>Human development reports</term><term>Human dimension</term><term>Human rights</term><term>Human settlements</term><term>Indiana university press</term><term>Inequality</term><term>International action</term><term>International community</term><term>International consensus</term><term>International cooperation</term><term>International efforts</term><term>International negotiations</term><term>International order</term><term>Ipcc</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Kyoto protocol</term><term>London school</term><term>Mainstream development</term><term>Mdgs</term><term>Millennium</term><term>Millennium campaign</term><term>Millennium development goals</term><term>Millennium project</term><term>Nations department</term><term>Nations development programme</term><term>Nations framework convention</term><term>Nations millennium declaration</term><term>Nations university press</term><term>Normative force</term><term>Oecd</term><term>Oecd countries</term><term>Online</term><term>Other hand</term><term>Overseas development institute</term><term>Oxford university press</term><term>Paris declaration</term><term>Participatory development</term><term>Political dimension</term><term>Political ideas</term><term>Political science</term><term>Political theory</term><term>Poor countries</term><term>Poverty reduction</term><term>Public information</term><term>Real wealth</term><term>Real world</term><term>Recent years</term><term>Rich countries</term><term>Same time</term><term>Second section</term><term>Social development</term><term>Social forces</term><term>Social integration</term><term>Social life</term><term>Specialized agencies</term><term>Sustainable</term><term>Sustainable development</term><term>Task force</term><term>Undp</term><term>Undp approach</term><term>Undp document</term><term>Unfccc</term><term>Washington consensus</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Accra agenda</term><term>Analytical framework</term><term>Annan</term><term>Bretton woods institutions</term><term>Civil society</term><term>Climate change</term><term>Climate change mitigation</term><term>Climate system</term><term>Credible critique</term><term>Cultural systems</term><term>Current state</term><term>Democracy promotion</term><term>Democratic governance</term><term>Development agenda</term><term>Development ideology</term><term>Development policies</term><term>Economic crisis</term><term>Economic growth</term><term>Election monitoring</term><term>Electoral assistance</term><term>February</term><term>General assembly resolution</term><term>Global</term><term>Global climate change</term><term>Global climate change policy</term><term>Global governance</term><term>Global partnership</term><term>Global policies</term><term>Global policy</term><term>Global warming</term><term>Good governance</term><term>Governance</term><term>Governance assessments</term><term>Great extent</term><term>History project</term><term>Http</term><term>Hulme</term><term>Human activity</term><term>Human development</term><term>Human development approach</term><term>Human development concept</term><term>Human development ideology</term><term>Human development report</term><term>Human development reports</term><term>Human dimension</term><term>Human rights</term><term>Human settlements</term><term>Indiana university press</term><term>Inequality</term><term>International action</term><term>International community</term><term>International consensus</term><term>International cooperation</term><term>International efforts</term><term>International negotiations</term><term>International order</term><term>Ipcc</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Kyoto protocol</term><term>London school</term><term>Mainstream development</term><term>Mdgs</term><term>Millennium</term><term>Millennium campaign</term><term>Millennium development goals</term><term>Millennium project</term><term>Nations department</term><term>Nations development programme</term><term>Nations framework convention</term><term>Nations millennium declaration</term><term>Nations university press</term><term>Normative force</term><term>Oecd</term><term>Oecd countries</term><term>Online</term><term>Other hand</term><term>Overseas development institute</term><term>Oxford university press</term><term>Paris declaration</term><term>Participatory development</term><term>Political dimension</term><term>Political ideas</term><term>Political science</term><term>Political theory</term><term>Poor countries</term><term>Poverty reduction</term><term>Public information</term><term>Real wealth</term><term>Real world</term><term>Recent years</term><term>Rich countries</term><term>Same time</term><term>Second section</term><term>Social development</term><term>Social forces</term><term>Social integration</term><term>Social life</term><term>Specialized agencies</term><term>Sustainable</term><term>Sustainable development</term><term>Task force</term><term>Undp</term><term>Undp approach</term><term>Undp document</term><term>Unfccc</term><term>Washington consensus</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Building on the work of the United Nations Intellectual History Project, this article argues that the ideology of human development has now become the driving normative force behind the global policies supported by the UN in the area of development. The first part focuses on the UN’s official discourse of the past two decades, and shows how it has been influenced by the concept of human development. The second section examines a set of global policies that illustrate how the UN has sought to put the principles of human development into practice. The article concludes that while human development ideology has represented for twenty years the most credible critique of mainstream development policies, its impact – like that of the UN in world affairs – remains nonetheless limited.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>human development</json:string><json:string>undp</json:string><json:string>february</json:string><json:string>online</json:string><json:string>mdgs</json:string><json:string>climate change</json:string><json:string>governance</json:string><json:string>oecd</json:string><json:string>global policy</json:string><json:string>political science</json:string><json:string>human rights</json:string><json:string>unfccc</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>london school</json:string><json:string>human development report</json:string><json:string>annan</json:string><json:string>global policies</json:string><json:string>http</json:string><json:string>global</json:string><json:string>sustainable</json:string><json:string>ipcc</json:string><json:string>democratic governance</json:string><json:string>human development ideology</json:string><json:string>hulme</json:string><json:string>poverty reduction</json:string><json:string>millennium development goals</json:string><json:string>sustainable development</json:string><json:string>development ideology</json:string><json:string>social integration</json:string><json:string>oxford university press</json:string><json:string>global governance</json:string><json:string>inequality</json:string><json:string>development agenda</json:string><json:string>recent years</json:string><json:string>global partnership</json:string><json:string>other hand</json:string><json:string>millennium project</json:string><json:string>millennium campaign</json:string><json:string>overseas development institute</json:string><json:string>same time</json:string><json:string>global warming</json:string><json:string>international community</json:string><json:string>international negotiations</json:string><json:string>kyoto protocol</json:string><json:string>indiana university press</json:string><json:string>millennium</json:string><json:string>human development approach</json:string><json:string>human dimension</json:string><json:string>cultural systems</json:string><json:string>human settlements</json:string><json:string>real world</json:string><json:string>analytical framework</json:string><json:string>human activity</json:string><json:string>social forces</json:string><json:string>international action</json:string><json:string>mainstream development</json:string><json:string>great extent</json:string><json:string>political theory</json:string><json:string>rich countries</json:string><json:string>credible critique</json:string><json:string>international order</json:string><json:string>undp document</json:string><json:string>political ideas</json:string><json:string>international efforts</json:string><json:string>social life</json:string><json:string>development policies</json:string><json:string>specialized agencies</json:string><json:string>nations millennium declaration</json:string><json:string>human development concept</json:string><json:string>washington consensus</json:string><json:string>economic crisis</json:string><json:string>economic growth</json:string><json:string>task force</json:string><json:string>real wealth</json:string><json:string>election monitoring</json:string><json:string>electoral assistance</json:string><json:string>civil society</json:string><json:string>governance assessments</json:string><json:string>participatory development</json:string><json:string>good governance</json:string><json:string>paris declaration</json:string><json:string>accra agenda</json:string><json:string>oecd countries</json:string><json:string>democracy promotion</json:string><json:string>bretton woods institutions</json:string><json:string>human development reports</json:string><json:string>current state</json:string><json:string>political dimension</json:string><json:string>nations framework convention</json:string><json:string>second section</json:string><json:string>climate system</json:string><json:string>poor countries</json:string><json:string>global climate change</json:string><json:string>global climate change policy</json:string><json:string>climate change mitigation</json:string><json:string>international consensus</json:string><json:string>normative force</json:string><json:string>history project</json:string><json:string>general assembly resolution</json:string><json:string>nations department</json:string><json:string>public information</json:string><json:string>social development</json:string><json:string>international cooperation</json:string><json:string>undp approach</json:string><json:string>nations university press</json:string><json:string>nations development programme</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Jean‐Philippe Thérien</name><affiliations><json:string>Université de Montréal</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>GPOL147</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-T7PG2K4S-8</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Building on the work of the United Nations Intellectual History Project, this article argues that the ideology of human development has now become the driving normative force behind the global policies supported by the UN in the area of development. The first part focuses on the UN’s official discourse of the past two decades, and shows how it has been influenced by the concept of human development. The second section examines a set of global policies that illustrate how the UN has sought to put the principles of human development into practice. The article concludes that while human development ideology has represented for twenty years the most credible critique of mainstream development policies, its impact – like that of the UN in world affairs – remains nonetheless limited.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.536</score><pdfWordCount>8830</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>56677</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>12</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>566.93 x 741.26 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>128</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>788</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>0</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>The United Nations and Human Development: From Ideology to Global Policies</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Global Policy</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1758-5899</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1758-5880</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1758-5899</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>GPOL</json:string></publisherId><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>1</first><last>12</last><total>12</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Research Article</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2009</json:string><json:string>2000</json:string><json:string>1992</json:string><json:string>1979</json:string><json:string>2005</json:string><json:string>1997</json:string><json:string>1990s</json:string><json:string>2012</json:string><json:string>2001</json:string><json:string>1960s</json:string><json:string>2002</json:string><json:string>1994</json:string><json:string>2007</json:string><json:string>1970s</json:string><json:string>1988</json:string><json:string>1990</json:string><json:string>1995</json:string><json:string>2008</json:string><json:string>2010</json:string><json:string>1991</json:string><json:string>2015</json:string><json:string>1980s</json:string></date><geogName><json:string>Bretton</json:string></geogName><orgName><json:string>Afghanistan and Iraq</json:string><json:string>World Bank</json:string><json:string>UNFCCC</json:string><json:string>Research Article Jean-Philippe Thérien Jean-Philippe Thérien</json:string><json:string>UNDEF</json:string><json:string>Sons Ltd.</json:string><json:string>Overseas Development Institute and UN Millennium Campaign</json:string><json:string>United Nations Environment Programme</json:string><json:string>UNDP</json:string><json:string>UN Millennium Project</json:string><json:string>IPCC</json:string><json:string>World Meteorological Organization</json:string><json:string>Pew Center on Global Climate Change</json:string><json:string>United Nations</json:string><json:string>China and India</json:string><json:string>OECD</json:string><json:string>UNEP</json:string><json:string>UNCEB</json:string><json:string>WMO</json:string><json:string>IMF</json:string><json:string>MDG Gap Task Force</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Manfred Steger</json:string><json:string>Stefan Gagné</json:string><json:string>Dominique Strauss-Kahn</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>DeSombre</json:string><json:string>Their</json:string><json:string>Boutros Boutros-Ghali</json:string><json:string>London School</json:string><json:string>Paris Declaration</json:string><json:string>Jean-Philippe Thérien</json:string><json:string>Jeffrey Sachs</json:string><json:string>Washington Consensus</json:string><json:string>Political Science</json:string><json:string>Philippe Joly</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Geneva</json:string><json:string>Kyoto</json:string><json:string>Accra</json:string><json:string>Toronto</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Fukuda-Parr, 2010</json:string><json:string>Ban, 2009a</json:string><json:string>Ponzio, 2004</json:string><json:string>United Nations, 2008, p. 3</json:string><json:string>OECD, 2010b</json:string><json:string>Fukuda-Parr, 2004</json:string><json:string>IMF, 2011</json:string><json:string>Soroos, 1986</json:string><json:string>United Nations, 2009b, p. 6</json:string><json:string>Betsill, 2005, p. 113</json:string><json:string>Whitehead, 2009</json:string><json:string>Jodoin, 2011</json:string><json:string>United Nations, 2009b, p. 156</json:string><json:string>Alston, 2005</json:string><json:string>Bulkeley and Newell, 2010</json:string><json:string>IPCC, 2011</json:string><json:string>UNDP, 2007, p. 1</json:string><json:string>UNDP, 2010a, p. 102</json:string><json:string>Gore, 2010</json:string><json:string>OECD, 2010a</json:string><json:string>Fukuda-Parr, 2003</json:string><json:string>Hulme and Fukuda-Parr, 2009, p. 20</json:string><json:string>Alston, 2005, p. 755</json:string><json:string>Hulme and Fukuda-Parr, 2009, p. 5</json:string><json:string>UNDP, 1997</json:string><json:string>UNCEB, 2008, p. 7</json:string><json:string>Reinicke, 1998</json:string><json:string>UNFCCC, 1992</json:string><json:string>Annan, 2000, p. 10</json:string><json:string>UNDP, 2010b, p. 110</json:string><json:string>Hulme and Fukuda-Parr, 2009</json:string><json:string>United Nations, 2005b, p. 30</json:string><json:string>United Nations, 2010b, p. 4</json:string><json:string>OECD, 2011</json:string><json:string>United Nations, 2009a, p. 1</json:string><json:string>Ban, 2010c</json:string><json:string>OECD, 2005</json:string><json:string>Kalilzad, 2010</json:string><json:string>Hulme, 2010</json:string><json:string>United Nations, 2001</json:string><json:string>UNDP, 1990, p. 10</json:string><json:string>UNDP, 2005, p. 39</json:string><json:string>United Nations, 2010b</json:string><json:string>Ludwig, 2004</json:string><json:string>Overseas Development Institute and UN Millennium Campaign, 2010, p. 2</json:string><json:string>UNDEF, 2010</json:string><json:string>McNeill, 2007, p. 12</json:string><json:string>Santiso, 2002</json:string><json:string>Clemens et al., 2007</json:string><json:string>UNDP, 1990</json:string><json:string>UNCEB, 2008, p. 5</json:string><json:string>Moss, 2010, p. 219</json:string><json:string>UNDP, 2010b</json:string><json:string>Manning, 2010</json:string><json:string>Jolly et al., 2009, p. 194</json:string><json:string>Payne and Phillips, 2010, p. 124</json:string><json:string>Steger, 2008</json:string><json:string>Sen, 1985</json:string><json:string>Jolly et al., 2004</json:string><json:string>Jolly et al. 2009, p. 195</json:string><json:string>UN Millennium Project, 2006</json:string><json:string>Thérien and Bélanger Dumontier, 2009</json:string><json:string>UNFCCC, 2008</json:string><json:string>Stokke, 2009</json:string><json:string>United Nations, 2010a, p. 4</json:string><json:string>UNCEB, 2008</json:string><json:string>Jolly et al., 2009</json:string><json:string>Danish, 2007, p. 11</json:string><json:string>Ban, 2009b</json:string><json:string>Pew Center on Global Climate Change, 2010</json:string><json:string>UNDP, 2002, p. 53</json:string><json:string>OECD, 2010c</json:string><json:string>Kaul et al., 1999</json:string><json:string>Huang, 2009, p. 438</json:string><json:string>OECD, 1995</json:string><json:string>OECD, 2008</json:string><json:string>Payne and Phillips, 2010, p. 123</json:string><json:string>United Nations, 2003, p. 31</json:string><json:string>United Nations, 2009c, p. 36</json:string><json:string>Worden, 2010</json:string><json:string>Alkire, 2010</json:string><json:string>Freeden, 1996</json:string><json:string>Thakur and Weiss, 2009</json:string><json:string>Murphy, 2006, p. 240</json:string><json:string>Danish, 2007, p. 10</json:string><json:string>Annan, 2005, p. 23</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-T7PG2K4S-8</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - social science</json:string><json:string>2 - political science</json:string><json:string>2 - international relations</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>3 - Law</json:string><json:string>1 - Physical Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Environmental Science</json:string><json:string>3 - Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law</json:string><json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>3 - Political Science and International Relations</json:string><json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Economics, Econometrics and Finance</json:string><json:string>3 - Economics and Econometrics</json:string><json:string>1 - Physical Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Environmental Science</json:string><json:string>3 - Global and Planetary Change</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00147.x</json:string></doi><id>661DC71EC70B183149A5F54C03E361D3083C4A08</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/661DC71EC70B183149A5F54C03E361D3083C4A08/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/661DC71EC70B183149A5F54C03E361D3083C4A08/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/661DC71EC70B183149A5F54C03E361D3083C4A08/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">The United Nations and Human Development: From Ideology to Global Policies</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2012 London School of Economics and Political Science and John Wiley & Sons Ltd</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2012-02"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The United Nations and Human Development: From Ideology to Global Policies</title><title level="a" type="short">The United Nations Human Development</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Jean‐Philippe</forename><surname>Thérien</surname></persName><affiliation>Université de Montréal</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">661DC71EC70B183149A5F54C03E361D3083C4A08</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-T7PG2K4S-8</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00147.x</idno><idno type="unit">GPOL147</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:GPOL.GPOL147.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Global Policy</title><title level="j" type="alt">GLOBAL POLICY</title><idno type="pISSN">1758-5880</idno><idno type="eISSN">1758-5899</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1758-5899</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/gpol.2012.3.issue-1</idno><idno type="product">GPOL</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="12">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">12</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-02"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main">
Abstract
<p>Building on the work of the <hi rend="italic">United Nations Intellectual History Project</hi>, this article argues that the ideology of human development has now become the driving normative force behind the global policies supported by the UN in the area of development. The first part focuses on the UN’s official discourse of the past two decades, and shows how it has been influenced by the concept of human development. The second section examines a set of global policies that illustrate how the UN has sought to put the principles of human development into practice. The article concludes that while human development ideology has represented for twenty years the most credible critique of mainstream development policies, its impact – like that of the UN in world affairs – remains nonetheless limited.</p>
Policy Implications
<p><list xml:id="l1" style="custom"><item n="•"><p> Human development currently represents the most credible alternative to mainstream development thinking and the most effective approach to fostering global justice.</p></item><item n="•"><p> The UN must provide greater leadership in showing that the future of global order will depend on the future of human development.</p></item><item n="•"><p> The UN should be far more pro‐active in identifying and fighting against the national and international factors that impede human development.</p></item><item n="•"><p> The coherence of global policies affecting human development needs to be strengthened.</p></item><item n="•"><p> The UN must cooperate much more closely with like‐minded social forces to effectually promote human development.</p></item></list></p></abstract><textClass><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Research Articles</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Research Article</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/661DC71EC70B183149A5F54C03E361D3083C4A08/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1758-5899</doi><issn type="print">1758-5880</issn><issn type="electronic">1758-5899</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="GPOL"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="GLOBAL POLICY">Global Policy</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="02101"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/gpol.2012.3.issue-1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="3">3</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-02">February 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="1" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00147.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="GPOL147"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="12"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Research Articles</title><title type="articleCategory">Research Article</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2012 London School of Economics and Political Science and John Wiley & Sons Ltd</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.0.1 mode:FullText" date="2012-01-27"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2012-01-27"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-01-27"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-26"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="1">1</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="12">12</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:GPOL.GPOL147.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">The United Nations and Human Development: From Ideology to Global Policies</title><title type="shortAuthors">Jean‐Philippe Thérien</title><title type="short">The United Nations Human Development</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>Jean‐Philippe</givenNames><familyName>Thérien</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="aff-1-1"><unparsedAffiliation>Université de Montréal</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><section xml:id="abs1-1"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>Building on the work of the <i>United Nations Intellectual History Project</i>, this article argues that the ideology of human development has now become the driving normative force behind the global policies supported by the UN in the area of development. The first part focuses on the UN’s official discourse of the past two decades, and shows how it has been influenced by the concept of human development. The second section examines a set of global policies that illustrate how the UN has sought to put the principles of human development into practice. The article concludes that while human development ideology has represented for twenty years the most credible critique of mainstream development policies, its impact – like that of the UN in world affairs – remains nonetheless limited.</p></section><section xml:id="abs1-2"><title type="main">Policy Implications</title><p><list xml:id="l1" style="custom"><listItem><label>•</label><p> Human development currently represents the most credible alternative to mainstream development thinking and the most effective approach to fostering global justice.</p></listItem><listItem><label>•</label><p> The UN must provide greater leadership in showing that the future of global order will depend on the future of human development.</p></listItem><listItem><label>•</label><p> The UN should be far more pro‐active in identifying and fighting against the national and international factors that impede human development.</p></listItem><listItem><label>•</label><p> The coherence of global policies affecting human development needs to be strengthened.</p></listItem><listItem><label>•</label><p> The UN must cooperate much more closely with like‐minded social forces to effectually promote human development.</p></listItem></list></p></section></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>The United Nations and Human Development: From Ideology to Global Policies</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>The United Nations Human Development</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>The United Nations and Human Development: From Ideology to Global Policies</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Jean‐Philippe</namePart><namePart type="family">Thérien</namePart><affiliation>Université de Montréal</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-02</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">0</extent><extent unit="tables">0</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Building on the work of the United Nations Intellectual History Project, this article argues that the ideology of human development has now become the driving normative force behind the global policies supported by the UN in the area of development. The first part focuses on the UN’s official discourse of the past two decades, and shows how it has been influenced by the concept of human development. The second section examines a set of global policies that illustrate how the UN has sought to put the principles of human development into practice. The article concludes that while human development ideology has represented for twenty years the most credible critique of mainstream development policies, its impact – like that of the UN in world affairs – remains nonetheless limited.</abstract><abstract>• Human development currently represents the most credible alternative to mainstream development thinking and the most effective approach to fostering global justice. • The UN must provide greater leadership in showing that the future of global order will depend on the future of human development. • The UN should be far more pro‐active in identifying and fighting against the national and international factors that impede human development. • The coherence of global policies affecting human development needs to be strengthened. • The UN must cooperate much more closely with like‐minded social forces to effectually promote human development.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Global Policy</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Research Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">1758-5880</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1758-5899</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1758-5899</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">GPOL</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>3</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>1</start><end>12</end><total>12</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">661DC71EC70B183149A5F54C03E361D3083C4A08</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-T7PG2K4S-8</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00147.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">GPOL147</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2012 London School of Economics and Political Science and John Wiley & Sons Ltd</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/661DC71EC70B183149A5F54C03E361D3083C4A08/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003234 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003234 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:661DC71EC70B183149A5F54C03E361D3083C4A08
|texte= The United Nations and Human Development: From Ideology to Global Policies
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |