EdenteV2, Istex, Corpus, bibRecord, 003200

The immediate rehabilitation by means of a ready‐made final fixed prosthesis in the edentulous mandible: a 1‐year follow‐up study on 50 consecutive patients

Identifieur interne : 003200 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 003199; suivant : 003201

The immediate rehabilitation by means of a ready‐made final fixed prosthesis in the edentulous mandible: a 1‐year follow‐up study on 50 consecutive patients

Auteurs : D. Van Steenberghe ; L. Molly ; R. Jacobs ; B. Vandekerckhove ; M. Quirynen ; I. Naert

Source :

Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2004-06.

RBID : ISTEX:656E924C1BFA09B2F30A732A6072982B9026346B

English descriptors

Abstract

Abstract: Although a two‐stage procedure with symphyseal oral implants can lead to a long‐term (15 years) 99% cumulative survival rate, a one‐stage approach with immediate loading via prefabricated elements seems to offer a short‐term acceptable outcome with significantly lower costs. A series of 50 consecutive patients, not eliminated for any systemic or smoking condition, received at the department of periodontology three implants in the symphyseal area, connected by a very rigid horse shoe‐shaped titanium bar. A final screw retained prosthetic framework was placed on top of it at the department of prosthetic dentistry within 2 days after surgery (44) or after a delay, due to purely external factors, of up to 10 days (6). Forty‐five patients were followed for 1 year. In one patient, all three implants failed and another four patients were lost to follow‐up. The cumulative failure rates for implants and prostheses at 1 year were, respectively, 7.3% and 5%. The mean marginal bone loss at 1 year was 1.08 mm (SD: 1.62; range −5.68 to +2.55). This study shows that stable marginal bone levels can be maintained around immediately loaded implants in the lower jaw in an average patient population for at least 1 year. The survival rate is, however, lower than for a staged approach.

Url:

https://api.istex.fr/document/656E924C1BFA09B2F30A732A6072982B9026346B/fulltext/pdf

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01069.x

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:656E924C1BFA09B2F30A732A6072982B9026346B

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The immediate rehabilitation by means of a ready‐made final fixed prosthesis in the edentulous mandible: a 1‐year follow‐up study on 50 consecutive patients</title>
<author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D." last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumD. van Steenberghe is holder of the P.I. Brånemark chair in Osseointegration</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Molly, L" sort="Molly, L" uniqKey="Molly L" first="L." last="Molly">L. Molly</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumD. van Steenberghe is holder of the P.I. Brånemark chair in Osseointegration</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Jacobs, R" sort="Jacobs, R" uniqKey="Jacobs R" first="R." last="Jacobs">R. Jacobs</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumD. van Steenberghe is holder of the P.I. Brånemark chair in Osseointegration</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral Imaging Center, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vandekerckhove, B" sort="Vandekerckhove, B" uniqKey="Vandekerckhove B" first="B." last="Vandekerckhove">B. Vandekerckhove</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumD. van Steenberghe is holder of the P.I. Brånemark chair in Osseointegration</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M." last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumD. van Steenberghe is holder of the P.I. Brånemark chair in Osseointegration</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Naert, I" sort="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I." last="Naert">I. Naert</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>BIOMAT Research Group, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:656E924C1BFA09B2F30A732A6072982B9026346B</idno>
<date when="2004" year="2004">2004</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01069.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/656E924C1BFA09B2F30A732A6072982B9026346B/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003200</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003200</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The immediate rehabilitation by means of a ready‐made final fixed prosthesis in the edentulous mandible: a 1‐year follow‐up study on 50 consecutive patients</title>
<author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D." last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumD. van Steenberghe is holder of the P.I. Brånemark chair in Osseointegration</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Molly, L" sort="Molly, L" uniqKey="Molly L" first="L." last="Molly">L. Molly</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumD. van Steenberghe is holder of the P.I. Brånemark chair in Osseointegration</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Jacobs, R" sort="Jacobs, R" uniqKey="Jacobs R" first="R." last="Jacobs">R. Jacobs</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumD. van Steenberghe is holder of the P.I. Brånemark chair in Osseointegration</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral Imaging Center, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vandekerckhove, B" sort="Vandekerckhove, B" uniqKey="Vandekerckhove B" first="B." last="Vandekerckhove">B. Vandekerckhove</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumD. van Steenberghe is holder of the P.I. Brånemark chair in Osseointegration</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M." last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumD. van Steenberghe is holder of the P.I. Brånemark chair in Osseointegration</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Naert, I" sort="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I." last="Naert">I. Naert</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>BIOMAT Research Group, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">15</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="360">360</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="365">365</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope>
<publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2004-06">2004-06</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone level</term>
<term>Bone loss</term>
<term>Bone quality</term>
<term>Bone quantity grade</term>
<term>Bonferroni correction</term>
<term>Catholic university</term>
<term>Clinical implant dentistry</term>
<term>Consecutive patients</term>
<term>Cumulative failure rate</term>
<term>Cumulative survival rate</term>
<term>Dental technician</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Dependent samples</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous mandible</term>
<term>Endosseous implants</term>
<term>Failure rate</term>
<term>Failure risk</term>
<term>Immediate loading</term>
<term>Immediate rehabilitation</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant failure</term>
<term>Implant installation</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Implants research</term>
<term>Individual implants</term>
<term>Initial bone level</term>
<term>International journal</term>
<term>Jacobs</term>
<term>Lekholm zarb</term>
<term>Leuven</term>
<term>Machined implant system</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Marginal bone height</term>
<term>Marginal bone level</term>
<term>Marginal bone loss</term>
<term>Nemark</term>
<term>Nemark novums</term>
<term>Nemark novums system</term>
<term>Observation period</term>
<term>Occlusal</term>
<term>Occlusal forces</term>
<term>Oral impl</term>
<term>Oral implants</term>
<term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term>
<term>Oral pathology</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Osseointegration</term>
<term>Other patients</term>
<term>Panoramic radiograph</term>
<term>Periodontology</term>
<term>Preliminary results</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Primary stability</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Prosthetic phase</term>
<term>Quantity distribution</term>
<term>Quirynen</term>
<term>Radiograph</term>
<term>Silicone lamel</term>
<term>Steenberghe</term>
<term>Survival rate</term>
<term>Symphyseal</term>
<term>Symphyseal area</term>
<term>Time points</term>
<term>Twostage approach</term>
<term>University hospital</term>
<term>Xtures</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone level</term>
<term>Bone loss</term>
<term>Bone quality</term>
<term>Bone quantity grade</term>
<term>Bonferroni correction</term>
<term>Catholic university</term>
<term>Clinical implant dentistry</term>
<term>Consecutive patients</term>
<term>Cumulative failure rate</term>
<term>Cumulative survival rate</term>
<term>Dental technician</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Dependent samples</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous mandible</term>
<term>Endosseous implants</term>
<term>Failure rate</term>
<term>Failure risk</term>
<term>Immediate loading</term>
<term>Immediate rehabilitation</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant failure</term>
<term>Implant installation</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Implants research</term>
<term>Individual implants</term>
<term>Initial bone level</term>
<term>International journal</term>
<term>Jacobs</term>
<term>Lekholm zarb</term>
<term>Leuven</term>
<term>Machined implant system</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Marginal bone height</term>
<term>Marginal bone level</term>
<term>Marginal bone loss</term>
<term>Nemark</term>
<term>Nemark novums</term>
<term>Nemark novums system</term>
<term>Observation period</term>
<term>Occlusal</term>
<term>Occlusal forces</term>
<term>Oral impl</term>
<term>Oral implants</term>
<term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term>
<term>Oral pathology</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Osseointegration</term>
<term>Other patients</term>
<term>Panoramic radiograph</term>
<term>Periodontology</term>
<term>Preliminary results</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Primary stability</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Prosthetic phase</term>
<term>Quantity distribution</term>
<term>Quirynen</term>
<term>Radiograph</term>
<term>Silicone lamel</term>
<term>Steenberghe</term>
<term>Survival rate</term>
<term>Symphyseal</term>
<term>Symphyseal area</term>
<term>Time points</term>
<term>Twostage approach</term>
<term>University hospital</term>
<term>Xtures</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">Abstract: Although a two‐stage procedure with symphyseal oral implants can lead to a long‐term (15 years) 99% cumulative survival rate, a one‐stage approach with immediate loading via prefabricated elements seems to offer a short‐term acceptable outcome with significantly lower costs. A series of 50 consecutive patients, not eliminated for any systemic or smoking condition, received at the department of periodontology three implants in the symphyseal area, connected by a very rigid horse shoe‐shaped titanium bar. A final screw retained prosthetic framework was placed on top of it at the department of prosthetic dentistry within 2 days after surgery (44) or after a delay, due to purely external factors, of up to 10 days (6). Forty‐five patients were followed for 1 year. In one patient, all three implants failed and another four patients were lost to follow‐up. The cumulative failure rates for implants and prostheses at 1 year were, respectively, 7.3% and 5%. The mean marginal bone loss at 1 year was 1.08 mm (SD: 1.62; range −5.68 to +2.55). This study shows that stable marginal bone levels can be maintained around immediately loaded implants in the lower jaw in an average patient population for at least 1 year. The survival rate is, however, lower than for a staged approach.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName>
<keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string>
<json:string>steenberghe</json:string>
<json:string>nemark</json:string>
<json:string>prosthetic</json:string>
<json:string>prosthesis</json:string>
<json:string>radiograph</json:string>
<json:string>xtures</json:string>
<json:string>mandible</json:string>
<json:string>leuven</json:string>
<json:string>edentulous mandible</json:string>
<json:string>bone loss</json:string>
<json:string>symphyseal</json:string>
<json:string>edentulous</json:string>
<json:string>periodontology</json:string>
<json:string>quirynen</json:string>
<json:string>occlusal</json:string>
<json:string>osseointegration</json:string>
<json:string>implants research</json:string>
<json:string>immediate rehabilitation</json:string>
<json:string>oral impl</json:string>
<json:string>implant failure</json:string>
<json:string>dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>symphyseal area</json:string>
<json:string>bone quality</json:string>
<json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string>
<json:string>immediate loading</json:string>
<json:string>international journal</json:string>
<json:string>catholic university</json:string>
<json:string>individual implants</json:string>
<json:string>failure rate</json:string>
<json:string>cumulative failure rate</json:string>
<json:string>oral maxillofacial implants</json:string>
<json:string>consecutive patients</json:string>
<json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>marginal bone level</json:string>
<json:string>oral pathology</json:string>
<json:string>implant installation</json:string>
<json:string>university hospital</json:string>
<json:string>lekholm zarb</json:string>
<json:string>silicone lamel</json:string>
<json:string>present study</json:string>
<json:string>dental technician</json:string>
<json:string>marginal bone height</json:string>
<json:string>time points</json:string>
<json:string>nemark novums</json:string>
<json:string>prosthetic phase</json:string>
<json:string>machined implant system</json:string>
<json:string>other patients</json:string>
<json:string>quantity distribution</json:string>
<json:string>bone quantity grade</json:string>
<json:string>oral implants</json:string>
<json:string>bonferroni correction</json:string>
<json:string>failure risk</json:string>
<json:string>panoramic radiograph</json:string>
<json:string>initial bone level</json:string>
<json:string>bone level</json:string>
<json:string>observation period</json:string>
<json:string>dependent samples</json:string>
<json:string>primary stability</json:string>
<json:string>endosseous implants</json:string>
<json:string>occlusal forces</json:string>
<json:string>twostage approach</json:string>
<json:string>nemark novums system</json:string>
<json:string>survival rate</json:string>
<json:string>preliminary results</json:string>
<json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string>
<json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>implant placement</json:string>
<json:string>cumulative survival rate</json:string>
<json:string>jacobs</json:string>
</teeft>
</keywords>
<author><json:item><name>D. Van Steenberghe</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumD. van Steenberghe is holder of the P.I. Brånemark chair in Osseointegration</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>L. Molly</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumD. van Steenberghe is holder of the P.I. Brånemark chair in Osseointegration</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>R. Jacobs</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumD. van Steenberghe is holder of the P.I. Brånemark chair in Osseointegration</json:string>
<json:string>Oral Imaging Center, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>B. Vandekerckhove</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumD. van Steenberghe is holder of the P.I. Brånemark chair in Osseointegration</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>M. Quirynen</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumD. van Steenberghe is holder of the P.I. Brånemark chair in Osseointegration</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>I. Naert</name>
<affiliations><json:string>BIOMAT Research Group, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>fixed prosthesis</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>immediate load</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>implants</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>mandible</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
<articleId><json:string>CLR1069</json:string>
</articleId>
<arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-08BSTMMB-0</arkIstex>
<language><json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>Abstract: Although a two‐stage procedure with symphyseal oral implants can lead to a long‐term (15 years) 99% cumulative survival rate, a one‐stage approach with immediate loading via prefabricated elements seems to offer a short‐term acceptable outcome with significantly lower costs. A series of 50 consecutive patients, not eliminated for any systemic or smoking condition, received at the department of periodontology three implants in the symphyseal area, connected by a very rigid horse shoe‐shaped titanium bar. A final screw retained prosthetic framework was placed on top of it at the department of prosthetic dentistry within 2 days after surgery (44) or after a delay, due to purely external factors, of up to 10 days (6). Forty‐five patients were followed for 1 year. In one patient, all three implants failed and another four patients were lost to follow‐up. The cumulative failure rates for implants and prostheses at 1 year were, respectively, 7.3% and 5%. The mean marginal bone loss at 1 year was 1.08 mm (SD: 1.62; range −5.68 to +2.55). This study shows that stable marginal bone levels can be maintained around immediately loaded implants in the lower jaw in an average patient population for at least 1 year. The survival rate is, however, lower than for a staged approach.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators><score>8.75</score>
<pdfWordCount>4254</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>27306</pdfCharCount>
<pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageCount>6</pdfPageCount>
<pdfPageSize>595 x 782 pts</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative>
<abstractWordCount>208</abstractWordCount>
<abstractCharCount>1294</abstractCharCount>
<keywordCount>4</keywordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>The immediate rehabilitation by means of a ready‐made final fixed prosthesis in the edentulous mandible: a 1‐year follow‐up study on 50 consecutive patients</title>
<pmid><json:string>15142100</json:string>
</pmid>
<genre><json:string>article</json:string>
</genre>
<host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
<language><json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string>
</doi>
<issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string>
</issn>
<eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string>
</eissn>
<publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string>
</publisherId>
<volume>15</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<pages><first>360</first>
<last>365</last>
<total>6</total>
</pages>
<genre><json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
</host>
<namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>72 and 7/69</json:string>
<json:string>2004</json:string>
</date>
<geogName></geogName>
<orgName><json:string>Oral Imaging Center</json:string>
<json:string>Department of Prosthetic</json:string>
<json:string>Department of Periodontology Kapucijnevoer</json:string>
<json:string>BIOMAT Research Group, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology</json:string>
<json:string>Leuven Belgium Tel</json:string>
<json:string>Catholic University</json:string>
<json:string>Department of Periodontology of the University Hospital of the Catholic University</json:string>
</orgName>
<orgName_funder></orgName_funder>
<orgName_provider></orgName_provider>
<persName><json:string>R. Jacobs</json:string>
<json:string>M. Quirynen</json:string>
<json:string>L. Molly</json:string>
<json:string>B. Vandekerckhove</json:string>
<json:string>System</json:string>
<json:string>Key</json:string>
<json:string>D. van Steenberghe</json:string>
<json:string>I. Naert</json:string>
</persName>
<placeName><json:string>Germany</json:string>
<json:string>Gothenburg</json:string>
<json:string>Leuven</json:string>
<json:string>Sweden</json:string>
<json:string>Belgium</json:string>
</placeName>
<ref_url></ref_url>
<ref_bibl><json:string>van Steenberghe et al</json:string>
<json:string>Jacobs 1998</json:string>
<json:string>Bra 1977</json:string>
<json:string>Chow et al. 2001</json:string>
<json:string>Bra 1999</json:string>
<json:string>Bernard et al. 1995</json:string>
<json:string>Ericsson et al. 2000</json:string>
<json:string>van Steenberghe et al. 1997</json:string>
<json:string>van Steenberghe et al. 2003</json:string>
<json:string>Quirynen et al. 2003</json:string>
<json:string>Randow et al. 1999</json:string>
<json:string>Lindquist et al. 1996</json:string>
<json:string>Steenberghe et al</json:string>
<json:string>van Steenberghe et al. 2002b</json:string>
<json:string>Bra 1995</json:string>
<json:string>Schnitman et al. 1997</json:string>
<json:string>Ledermann et al. 1998</json:string>
</ref_bibl>
<bibl></bibl>
</unitex>
</namedEntities>
<ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-08BSTMMB-0</json:string>
</ark>
<categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string>
<json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string>
<json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string>
</wos>
<scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string>
<json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string>
</scienceMetrix>
<scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string>
</scopus>
</categories>
<publicationDate>2004</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2004</copyrightDate>
<doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01069.x</json:string>
</doi>
<id>656E924C1BFA09B2F30A732A6072982B9026346B</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/656E924C1BFA09B2F30A732A6072982B9026346B/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item><extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/656E924C1BFA09B2F30A732A6072982B9026346B/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/656E924C1BFA09B2F30A732A6072982B9026346B/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">The immediate rehabilitation by means of a ready‐made final fixed prosthesis in the edentulous mandible: a 1‐year follow‐up study on 50 consecutive patients</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2004-06"></date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note>
<note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The immediate rehabilitation by means of a ready‐made final fixed prosthesis in the edentulous mandible: a 1‐year follow‐up study on 50 consecutive patients</title>
<title level="a" type="short">Immediate rehabilitation in edentulous mandible</title>
<author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">D.</forename>
<surname>Van Steenberghe</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium  D. van Steenberghe is holder of the P.I. Brånemark chair in Osseointegration<address><country key="BE"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">L.</forename>
<surname>Molly</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium  D. van Steenberghe is holder of the P.I. Brånemark chair in Osseointegration<address><country key="BE"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">R.</forename>
<surname>Jacobs</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>
Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
 D. van Steenberghe is holder of the P.I. Brånemark chair in Osseointegration<address><country key="BE"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>Oral Imaging Center, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">B.</forename>
<surname>Vandekerckhove</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium  D. van Steenberghe is holder of the P.I. Brånemark chair in Osseointegration<address><country key="BE"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">M.</forename>
<surname>Quirynen</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium  D. van Steenberghe is holder of the P.I. Brånemark chair in Osseointegration<address><country key="BE"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0005"><persName><forename type="first">I.</forename>
<surname>Naert</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>BIOMAT Research Group, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<idno type="istex">656E924C1BFA09B2F30A732A6072982B9026346B</idno>
<idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-08BSTMMB-0</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01069.x</idno>
<idno type="unit">CLR1069</idno>
<idno type="supplier">1069</idno>
<idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR1069.pdf</idno>
</analytic>
<monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title>
<idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno>
<idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno>
<idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2004.15.issue-3</idno>
<idno type="product">CLR</idno>
<idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">15</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="360">360</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="365">365</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope>
<publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2004-06"></date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold">Abstract: </hi>
 Although a two‐stage procedure with symphyseal oral implants can lead to a long‐term (15 years) 99% cumulative survival rate, a one‐stage approach with immediate loading via prefabricated elements seems to offer a short‐term acceptable outcome with significantly lower costs. A series of 50 consecutive patients, not eliminated for any systemic or smoking condition, received at the department of periodontology three implants in the symphyseal area, connected by a very rigid horse shoe‐shaped titanium bar. A final screw retained prosthetic framework was placed on top of it at the department of prosthetic dentistry within 2 days after surgery (44) or after a delay, due to purely external factors, of up to 10 days (6). Forty‐five patients were followed for 1 year. In one patient, all three implants failed and another four patients were lost to follow‐up. The cumulative failure rates for implants and prostheses at 1 year were, respectively, 7.3% and 5%. The mean marginal bone loss at 1 year was 1.08 mm (SD: 1.62; range −5.68 to +2.55). This study shows that stable marginal bone levels can be maintained around immediately loaded implants in the lower jaw in an average patient population for at least 1 year. The survival rate is, however, lower than for a staged approach.</p>
</abstract>
<abstract xml:lang="fr" style="main"><head>Résumé</head>
<p>Bien qu'un processus en deux étapes pour les implants buccaux peut crééer un taux de survie cumulatif de 99% après quinze années, une approche en une étape avec charge immédiate via des éléments préfabriqués semble offrir une issue acceptable à long terme à des coûts significativement inférieurs. Une série de 50 patients, non‐éliminés pour conditions systémique ou tabagisme, ont reçu dans le département de parodontologie trois implants dans l'aire symphyséale reliés par une barre très rigide en titane en forme de fer à cheval. Une vis retenant la prothèse a enfin été placée à son sommet dans le département de prothèse dans les deux jours après la chirurgie (44) ou après une attente (dûe à des facteurs tout à fait externes) jusqu'à 10 jours (6). Quarante‐cinq patients ont été suivis pendant une année. Chez un patient les trois implants ont échoués et quatre patients ont été perdus durant le suivi. Le taux d'échec cumulatif pour les implants et les prothèses après une année était respectivement de 7,3 et 5,0%. La perte osseuse marginale moyenne après un an était de 1,08 mm (Sd : 1,62; de −5,68 à+2,55). Cette étude montre que des niveaux osseux marginaux stables peuvent être maintenus autour des implants mis en charge immédiatement dans la mandibule dans une population normale pour au minimum un an. Le taux de survie est cependant inférieur à celui obtenu à l'aide d'une approche par étapes.</p>
</abstract>
<abstract xml:lang="de" style="main"><head>Zusammenfassung</head>
<p> 
               <hi rend="italic">Die sofortige Wiederherstellung mittels einer vorfabrizierten definitiven festsitzenden Rekonstruktion im zahnlosen Unterkiefer: eine Studie über 1 Jahr an 50 aufeinander folgenden Patienten</hi> 
            </p>
<p>Obwohl das Vorgehen in 2 Phasen mit zweiteiligen oralen Implantaten zu kumulativen Ueberlebensraten von 99%über einen langen Zeitraum (15 Jahre) führen kann, scheint auch das Vorgehen in einer Phase mit Sofortbelastung durch vorfabrizierte Elemente über einen kurzen Zeitraum zu akzeptablen Resultaten mit signifikant geringeren Kosten zu führen.</p>
<p>Eine Serie von 50 aufeinander folgenden Patienten, ohne Elimination bezüglich systemischen Problemen oder Rauchen, erhielten an der Abteilung für Parodontologie 3 Implantate in der Region der UK‐Symphyse, welche durch einen sehr steifen hufeisenförmigen Titansteg verbunden wurden. Das definitive verschraubte prothetische Gerüst wurde auf der Abteilung für prothetische Zahnmedizin innerhalb von zwei Tagen nach der Chirurgie (44) oder aufgrund externer Faktoren mit einer Verzögerung bis zu 10 Tagen (6) auf den Implantaten befestigt.</p>
<p>45 Patienten konnten über ein Jahr beobachtet werden. Bei einem Patienten zeigten alle 3 Implantate Misserfolge und bei 4 anderen Patienten konnten keine Nachkontrollen durchgeführt werden. Die kumulative Misserfolgsrate nach 1 Jahr betrug für die Implantate 7.3% und für die Rekonstruktionen 5.0%. Der mittlere marginale Knochenverlust nach einem Jahr betrug 1.08mm (sd: 1.62; Bandbreite −5.68 bis +2.55).</p>
<p>Diese Studie zeigt, dass stabile marginale Knochenniveaus um sofort belastete Implantate im Unterkiefer bei einer durchschnittlichen Patientenpopulation zumindest für ein Jahr erhalten werden können. Die Ueberlebensrate ist aber tiefer als beim Vorgehen in 2 Phasen.</p>
</abstract>
<abstract xml:lang="es" style="main"><head>Resumen</head>
<p>Aunque un procedimiento de dos fases con implantes orales sinfisales puede conducir a una tasa de supervivencia acumulativa a largo plazo (15 años) del 99%, un enfoque de una sola fase con carga inmediata vía elementos prefabricados parece ofrecer unos resultados a corto plazo aceptables con unos costes significativamente mas bajos.</p>
<p>Una serie de 50 pacientes consecutivos, no eliminados por ninguna condición sistémica o tabáquica, recibieron en el departamento de periodoncia 3 implantes en el área sinfisal, conectados por una barra de titanio, muy rígida con forma de herradura. Se colocó una estructura prostética final retenida por tornillos sobre esta en el departamento de prótesis a los dos días de la cirugía (44) o tras un retraso, debido puramente a factores externos, de hasta 10 días.</p>
<p>Se siguió a 45 pacientes durante 1 año. En un paciente los 3 implantes fracasaron y en otros 4 pacientes se desaparecieron en el seguimiento. El índice acumulativo de fracaso para los implantes y las prótesis al año fue respectivamente de 7.3% y 5.0%. La pérdida de hueso marginal media al año fue de 1.08 mm (sd: 1.62; rango −5.68 a +2.55).</p>
<p>Este estudio muestra que se pueden mantener niveles de hueso marginal estables alrededor de implantes cargados inmediatamente en el maxilar inferior en una población de pacientes media por lo menos durante un año. El índice de supervivencia es de todos modos más bajo que para un enfoque por fases.</p>
<p> 
               <graphic url="image_n/CLR_1069_fu1.gif" rend="inline image"></graphic> 
            </p>
</abstract>
<textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">fixed prosthesis</term>
<term xml:id="k2">immediate load</term>
<term xml:id="k3">implants</term>
<term xml:id="k4">mandible</term>
</keywords>
<keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original articles</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en"></language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item><extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/656E924C1BFA09B2F30A732A6072982B9026346B/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisherName>
<publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc>
</publisherInfo>
<doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi>
<issn type="print">0905-7161</issn>
<issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn>
<idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id>
<id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id>
</idGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
</titleGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="part" position="06003"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2004.15.issue-3</doi>
<numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="15">15</numbering>
<numbering type="journalIssue" number="3">3</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<coverDate startDate="2004-06">June 2004</coverDate>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="14" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01069.x</doi>
<idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR1069"></id>
<id type="supplier" value="1069"></id>
</idGroup>
<countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="6"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original articles</title>
</titleGroup>
<eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2004-05-07"></event>
<event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2004-05-07"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-15"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event>
</eventGroup>
<numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="360">360</numbering>
<numbering type="pageLast" number="365">365</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<correspondenceTo><b>Correspondence to:</b>
 
<i>Prof. D. van Steenberghe</i>
 Department of Periodontology
 Kapucijnevoer 7
 B‐3000 Leuven
 Belgium
 Tel.: +32 16332407
 Fax: +32 16332484
 e‐mail: <email normalForm="Daniel.vanSteenberghe@uz.kuleuven.ac.be">Daniel.vanSteenberghe@uz.kuleuven.ac.be</email>
</correspondenceTo>
<linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR1069.pdf"></link>
</linkGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Date: Accepted 5 January 2004</unparsedEditorialHistory>
<countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="1"></count>
<count type="tableTotal" number="5"></count>
<count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count>
<count type="referenceTotal" number="23"></count>
<count type="wordTotal" number="5821"></count>
<count type="linksCrossRef" number="31"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="main">The immediate rehabilitation by means of a ready‐made final fixed prosthesis in the edentulous mandible: a 1‐year follow‐up study on 50 consecutive patients</title>
<title type="shortAuthors">van Steenberghe et al.</title>
<title type="short">Immediate rehabilitation in edentulous mandible</title>
</titleGroup>
<creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>D.</givenNames>
<familyName>Van Steenberghe</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>L.</givenNames>
<familyName>Molly</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1 #a2"><personName><givenNames>R.</givenNames>
<familyName>Jacobs</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>B.</givenNames>
<familyName>Vandekerckhove</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>M.</givenNames>
<familyName>Quirynen</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr6" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>I.</givenNames>
<familyName>Naert</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
</creators>
<affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>
Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
 D. van Steenberghe is holder of the P.I. Brånemark chair in Osseointegration</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Oral Imaging Center, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>BIOMAT Research Group, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
</affiliationGroup>
<keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">fixed prosthesis</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k2">immediate load</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k3">implants</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k4">mandible</keyword>
</keywordGroup>
<abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Abstract: </b>
 Although a two‐stage procedure with symphyseal oral implants can lead to a long‐term (15 years) 99% cumulative survival rate, a one‐stage approach with immediate loading via prefabricated elements seems to offer a short‐term acceptable outcome with significantly lower costs. A series of 50 consecutive patients, not eliminated for any systemic or smoking condition, received at the department of periodontology three implants in the symphyseal area, connected by a very rigid horse shoe‐shaped titanium bar. A final screw retained prosthetic framework was placed on top of it at the department of prosthetic dentistry within 2 days after surgery (44) or after a delay, due to purely external factors, of up to 10 days (6). Forty‐five patients were followed for 1 year. In one patient, all three implants failed and another four patients were lost to follow‐up. The cumulative failure rates for implants and prostheses at 1 year were, respectively, 7.3% and 5%. The mean marginal bone loss at 1 year was 1.08 mm (SD: 1.62; range −5.68 to +2.55). This study shows that stable marginal bone levels can be maintained around immediately loaded implants in the lower jaw in an average patient population for at least 1 year. The survival rate is, however, lower than for a staged approach.</p><!--

          
            To cite this article:
            

van Steenberghe D, Molly L, Jacobs R, Vandekerckhove B, Quirynen M, Naert I. The immediate rehabilitation by means of a ready-made final fixed prosthesis in the edentulous mandible: a 1-year follow-up study on 50 consecutive patients.



Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 15, 2004; 360–365
        
--></abstract>
<abstract type="main" xml:lang="fr"><title type="main">Résumé</title>
<p>Bien qu'un processus en deux étapes pour les implants buccaux peut crééer un taux de survie cumulatif de 99% après quinze années, une approche en une étape avec charge immédiate via des éléments préfabriqués semble offrir une issue acceptable à long terme à des coûts significativement inférieurs. Une série de 50 patients, non‐éliminés pour conditions systémique ou tabagisme, ont reçu dans le département de parodontologie trois implants dans l'aire symphyséale reliés par une barre très rigide en titane en forme de fer à cheval. Une vis retenant la prothèse a enfin été placée à son sommet dans le département de prothèse dans les deux jours après la chirurgie (44) ou après une attente (dûe à des facteurs tout à fait externes) jusqu'à 10 jours (6). Quarante‐cinq patients ont été suivis pendant une année. Chez un patient les trois implants ont échoués et quatre patients ont été perdus durant le suivi. Le taux d'échec cumulatif pour les implants et les prothèses après une année était respectivement de 7,3 et 5,0%. La perte osseuse marginale moyenne après un an était de 1,08 mm (Sd : 1,62; de −5,68 à+2,55). Cette étude montre que des niveaux osseux marginaux stables peuvent être maintenus autour des implants mis en charge immédiatement dans la mandibule dans une population normale pour au minimum un an. Le taux de survie est cependant inférieur à celui obtenu à l'aide d'une approche par étapes.</p>
</abstract>
<abstract type="main" xml:lang="de"><title type="main">Zusammenfassung</title>
<p> <i>Die sofortige Wiederherstellung mittels einer vorfabrizierten definitiven festsitzenden Rekonstruktion im zahnlosen Unterkiefer: eine Studie über 1 Jahr an 50 aufeinander folgenden Patienten</i>
 </p>
<p>Obwohl das Vorgehen in 2 Phasen mit zweiteiligen oralen Implantaten zu kumulativen Ueberlebensraten von 99%über einen langen Zeitraum (15 Jahre) führen kann, scheint auch das Vorgehen in einer Phase mit Sofortbelastung durch vorfabrizierte Elemente über einen kurzen Zeitraum zu akzeptablen Resultaten mit signifikant geringeren Kosten zu führen.</p>
<p>Eine Serie von 50 aufeinander folgenden Patienten, ohne Elimination bezüglich systemischen Problemen oder Rauchen, erhielten an der Abteilung für Parodontologie 3 Implantate in der Region der UK‐Symphyse, welche durch einen sehr steifen hufeisenförmigen Titansteg verbunden wurden. Das definitive verschraubte prothetische Gerüst wurde auf der Abteilung für prothetische Zahnmedizin innerhalb von zwei Tagen nach der Chirurgie (44) oder aufgrund externer Faktoren mit einer Verzögerung bis zu 10 Tagen (6) auf den Implantaten befestigt.</p>
<p>45 Patienten konnten über ein Jahr beobachtet werden. Bei einem Patienten zeigten alle 3 Implantate Misserfolge und bei 4 anderen Patienten konnten keine Nachkontrollen durchgeführt werden. Die kumulative Misserfolgsrate nach 1 Jahr betrug für die Implantate 7.3% und für die Rekonstruktionen 5.0%. Der mittlere marginale Knochenverlust nach einem Jahr betrug 1.08mm (sd: 1.62; Bandbreite −5.68 bis +2.55).</p>
<p>Diese Studie zeigt, dass stabile marginale Knochenniveaus um sofort belastete Implantate im Unterkiefer bei einer durchschnittlichen Patientenpopulation zumindest für ein Jahr erhalten werden können. Die Ueberlebensrate ist aber tiefer als beim Vorgehen in 2 Phasen.</p>
</abstract>
<abstract type="main" xml:lang="es"><title type="main">Resumen</title>
<p>Aunque un procedimiento de dos fases con implantes orales sinfisales puede conducir a una tasa de supervivencia acumulativa a largo plazo (15 años) del 99%, un enfoque de una sola fase con carga inmediata vía elementos prefabricados parece ofrecer unos resultados a corto plazo aceptables con unos costes significativamente mas bajos.</p>
<p>Una serie de 50 pacientes consecutivos, no eliminados por ninguna condición sistémica o tabáquica, recibieron en el departamento de periodoncia 3 implantes en el área sinfisal, conectados por una barra de titanio, muy rígida con forma de herradura. Se colocó una estructura prostética final retenida por tornillos sobre esta en el departamento de prótesis a los dos días de la cirugía (44) o tras un retraso, debido puramente a factores externos, de hasta 10 días.</p>
<p>Se siguió a 45 pacientes durante 1 año. En un paciente los 3 implantes fracasaron y en otros 4 pacientes se desaparecieron en el seguimiento. El índice acumulativo de fracaso para los implantes y las prótesis al año fue respectivamente de 7.3% y 5.0%. La pérdida de hueso marginal media al año fue de 1.08 mm (sd: 1.62; rango −5.68 a +2.55).</p>
<p>Este estudio muestra que se pueden mantener niveles de hueso marginal estables alrededor de implantes cargados inmediatamente en el maxilar inferior en una población de pacientes media por lo menos durante un año. El índice de supervivencia es de todos modos más bajo que para un enfoque por fases.</p>
<p> <inlineGraphic alt="inline image" location="image_n/CLR_1069_fu1.gif" href=""></inlineGraphic>
 </p>
</abstract>
</abstractGroup>
</contentMeta>
</header>
</component>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>The immediate rehabilitation by means of a ready‐made final fixed prosthesis in the edentulous mandible: a 1‐year follow‐up study on 50 consecutive patients</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Immediate rehabilitation in edentulous mandible</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>The immediate rehabilitation by means of a ready‐made final fixed prosthesis in the edentulous mandible: a 1‐year follow‐up study on 50 consecutive patients</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">D.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Van Steenberghe</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumD. van Steenberghe is holder of the P.I. Brånemark chair in Osseointegration</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">L.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Molly</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumD. van Steenberghe is holder of the P.I. Brånemark chair in Osseointegration</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">R.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Jacobs</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumD. van Steenberghe is holder of the P.I. Brånemark chair in Osseointegration</affiliation>
<affiliation>Oral Imaging Center, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">B.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Vandekerckhove</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumD. van Steenberghe is holder of the P.I. Brånemark chair in Osseointegration</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Quirynen</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumD. van Steenberghe is holder of the P.I. Brånemark chair in Osseointegration</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">I.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Naert</namePart>
<affiliation>BIOMAT Research Group, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre>
<originInfo><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher>
<place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2004-06</dateIssued>
<edition>Date: Accepted 5 January 2004</edition>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2004</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">1</extent>
<extent unit="tables">5</extent>
<extent unit="formulas">0</extent>
<extent unit="references">23</extent>
<extent unit="linksCrossRef">31</extent>
<extent unit="words">5821</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract>Abstract: Although a two‐stage procedure with symphyseal oral implants can lead to a long‐term (15 years) 99% cumulative survival rate, a one‐stage approach with immediate loading via prefabricated elements seems to offer a short‐term acceptable outcome with significantly lower costs. A series of 50 consecutive patients, not eliminated for any systemic or smoking condition, received at the department of periodontology three implants in the symphyseal area, connected by a very rigid horse shoe‐shaped titanium bar. A final screw retained prosthetic framework was placed on top of it at the department of prosthetic dentistry within 2 days after surgery (44) or after a delay, due to purely external factors, of up to 10 days (6). Forty‐five patients were followed for 1 year. In one patient, all three implants failed and another four patients were lost to follow‐up. The cumulative failure rates for implants and prostheses at 1 year were, respectively, 7.3% and 5%. The mean marginal bone loss at 1 year was 1.08 mm (SD: 1.62; range −5.68 to +2.55). This study shows that stable marginal bone levels can be maintained around immediately loaded implants in the lower jaw in an average patient population for at least 1 year. The survival rate is, however, lower than for a staged approach.</abstract>
<abstract lang="fr">Bien qu'un processus en deux étapes pour les implants buccaux peut crééer un taux de survie cumulatif de 99% après quinze années, une approche en une étape avec charge immédiate via des éléments préfabriqués semble offrir une issue acceptable à long terme à des coûts significativement inférieurs. Une série de 50 patients, non‐éliminés pour conditions systémique ou tabagisme, ont reçu dans le département de parodontologie trois implants dans l'aire symphyséale reliés par une barre très rigide en titane en forme de fer à cheval. Une vis retenant la prothèse a enfin été placée à son sommet dans le département de prothèse dans les deux jours après la chirurgie (44) ou après une attente (dûe à des facteurs tout à fait externes) jusqu'à 10 jours (6). Quarante‐cinq patients ont été suivis pendant une année. Chez un patient les trois implants ont échoués et quatre patients ont été perdus durant le suivi. Le taux d'échec cumulatif pour les implants et les prothèses après une année était respectivement de 7,3 et 5,0%. La perte osseuse marginale moyenne après un an était de 1,08 mm (Sd : 1,62; de −5,68 à+2,55). Cette étude montre que des niveaux osseux marginaux stables peuvent être maintenus autour des implants mis en charge immédiatement dans la mandibule dans une population normale pour au minimum un an. Le taux de survie est cependant inférieur à celui obtenu à l'aide d'une approche par étapes.</abstract>
<abstract lang="de">Die sofortige Wiederherstellung mittels einer vorfabrizierten definitiven festsitzenden Rekonstruktion im zahnlosen Unterkiefer: eine Studie über 1 Jahr an 50 aufeinander folgenden Patienten Obwohl das Vorgehen in 2 Phasen mit zweiteiligen oralen Implantaten zu kumulativen Ueberlebensraten von 99%über einen langen Zeitraum (15 Jahre) führen kann, scheint auch das Vorgehen in einer Phase mit Sofortbelastung durch vorfabrizierte Elemente über einen kurzen Zeitraum zu akzeptablen Resultaten mit signifikant geringeren Kosten zu führen. Eine Serie von 50 aufeinander folgenden Patienten, ohne Elimination bezüglich systemischen Problemen oder Rauchen, erhielten an der Abteilung für Parodontologie 3 Implantate in der Region der UK‐Symphyse, welche durch einen sehr steifen hufeisenförmigen Titansteg verbunden wurden. Das definitive verschraubte prothetische Gerüst wurde auf der Abteilung für prothetische Zahnmedizin innerhalb von zwei Tagen nach der Chirurgie (44) oder aufgrund externer Faktoren mit einer Verzögerung bis zu 10 Tagen (6) auf den Implantaten befestigt. 45 Patienten konnten über ein Jahr beobachtet werden. Bei einem Patienten zeigten alle 3 Implantate Misserfolge und bei 4 anderen Patienten konnten keine Nachkontrollen durchgeführt werden. Die kumulative Misserfolgsrate nach 1 Jahr betrug für die Implantate 7.3% und für die Rekonstruktionen 5.0%. Der mittlere marginale Knochenverlust nach einem Jahr betrug 1.08mm (sd: 1.62; Bandbreite −5.68 bis +2.55). Diese Studie zeigt, dass stabile marginale Knochenniveaus um sofort belastete Implantate im Unterkiefer bei einer durchschnittlichen Patientenpopulation zumindest für ein Jahr erhalten werden können. Die Ueberlebensrate ist aber tiefer als beim Vorgehen in 2 Phasen.</abstract>
<abstract lang="es">Aunque un procedimiento de dos fases con implantes orales sinfisales puede conducir a una tasa de supervivencia acumulativa a largo plazo (15 años) del 99%, un enfoque de una sola fase con carga inmediata vía elementos prefabricados parece ofrecer unos resultados a corto plazo aceptables con unos costes significativamente mas bajos. Una serie de 50 pacientes consecutivos, no eliminados por ninguna condición sistémica o tabáquica, recibieron en el departamento de periodoncia 3 implantes en el área sinfisal, conectados por una barra de titanio, muy rígida con forma de herradura. Se colocó una estructura prostética final retenida por tornillos sobre esta en el departamento de prótesis a los dos días de la cirugía (44) o tras un retraso, debido puramente a factores externos, de hasta 10 días. Se siguió a 45 pacientes durante 1 año. En un paciente los 3 implantes fracasaron y en otros 4 pacientes se desaparecieron en el seguimiento. El índice acumulativo de fracaso para los implantes y las prótesis al año fue respectivamente de 7.3% y 5.0%. La pérdida de hueso marginal media al año fue de 1.08 mm (sd: 1.62; rango −5.68 a +2.55). Este estudio muestra que se pueden mantener niveles de hueso marginal estables alrededor de implantes cargados inmediatamente en el maxilar inferior en una población de pacientes media por lo menos durante un año. El índice de supervivencia es de todos modos más bajo que para un enfoque por fases.</abstract>
<subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre>
<topic>fixed prosthesis</topic>
<topic>immediate load</topic>
<topic>implants</topic>
<topic>mandible</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre>
<identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier>
<part><date>2004</date>
<detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption>
<number>15</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption>
<number>3</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages"><start>360</start>
<end>365</end>
<total>6</total>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">656E924C1BFA09B2F30A732A6072982B9026346B</identifier>
<identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-08BSTMMB-0</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01069.x</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">CLR1069</identifier>
<recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>Munksgaard International Publishers</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
<json:item><extension>json</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/json</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/656E924C1BFA09B2F30A732A6072982B9026346B/metadata/json</uri>
</json:item>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003200 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003200 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:656E924C1BFA09B2F30A732A6072982B9026346B
   |texte=   The immediate rehabilitation by means of a ready‐made final fixed prosthesis in the edentulous mandible: a 1‐year follow‐up study on 50 consecutive patients
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

The immediate rehabilitation by means of a ready‐made final fixed prosthesis in the edentulous mandible: a 1‐year follow‐up study on 50 consecutive patients

The immediate rehabilitation by means of a ready‐made final fixed prosthesis in the edentulous mandible: a 1‐year follow‐up study on 50 consecutive patients

Source :

English descriptors

Abstract

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri