A 10‐Year Prospective Study of Single Tooth Implants Placed in the Anterior Maxilla
Identifieur interne : 003157 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 003156; suivant : 003158A 10‐Year Prospective Study of Single Tooth Implants Placed in the Anterior Maxilla
Auteurs : Klaus GotfredsenSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2012-03.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment screw, Aesthetic outcomes, Annual bone loss, Anterior maxilla, Astra, Astra tech, Baseline, Baseline examination, Bone loss, Buccal, Buccal abscess, Central incisors, Ceramic fracture, Ceramic fractures, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Clin periodontol, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical parameters, Complication rates, Crown survival, Crown survival rate, Early implant placement, Extraction, Extraction socket, Extraction sockets, Fracture, Health science, Immediate implant placement, Implant, Implant crown, Implant level, Implant placement, Implant region, Implant survival, Implant therapy, Issc, Klaus gotfredsen, Lateral incisor, Lingual side, Marginal bone, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone level changes, Marginal bone levels, Marginal bone loss, Mucositis, Natural teeth, Observation period, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral rehabil, Oral rehabilitation, Other crown, Partial dentures, Patient satisfaction, Pjetursson, Plaque, Present study, Prospective cohort study, Prospective study, Reference point, Single crowns, Single tooth, Single tooth implants, Survival rate, Systematic review, Technical complications, Technical outcomes, Tooth agenesis, Tooth extraction, Visual analogue scale.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment screw, Aesthetic outcomes, Annual bone loss, Anterior maxilla, Astra, Astra tech, Baseline, Baseline examination, Bone loss, Buccal, Buccal abscess, Central incisors, Ceramic fracture, Ceramic fractures, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Clin periodontol, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical parameters, Complication rates, Crown survival, Crown survival rate, Early implant placement, Extraction, Extraction socket, Extraction sockets, Fracture, Health science, Immediate implant placement, Implant, Implant crown, Implant level, Implant placement, Implant region, Implant survival, Implant therapy, Issc, Klaus gotfredsen, Lateral incisor, Lingual side, Marginal bone, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone level changes, Marginal bone levels, Marginal bone loss, Mucositis, Natural teeth, Observation period, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral rehabil, Oral rehabilitation, Other crown, Partial dentures, Patient satisfaction, Pjetursson, Plaque, Present study, Prospective cohort study, Prospective study, Reference point, Single crowns, Single tooth, Single tooth implants, Survival rate, Systematic review, Technical complications, Technical outcomes, Tooth agenesis, Tooth extraction, Visual analogue scale.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate the biological and technical outcomes of early and delayed placed single tooth implants after 10 years of follow‐up.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00231.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:647A4DE552078AF6B27F6478DD1BBF3343AF98BALe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A 10‐Year Prospective Study of Single Tooth Implants Placed in the Anterior Maxilla</title><author><name sortKey="Gotfredsen, Klaus" sort="Gotfredsen, Klaus" uniqKey="Gotfredsen K" first="Klaus" last="Gotfredsen">Klaus Gotfredsen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Nörre Allé 20, DK‐2200 Copenhagen N</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: klg@odont.ku.dk</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:647A4DE552078AF6B27F6478DD1BBF3343AF98BA</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00231.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/647A4DE552078AF6B27F6478DD1BBF3343AF98BA/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003157</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003157</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A 10‐Year Prospective Study of Single Tooth Implants Placed in the Anterior Maxilla</title><author><name sortKey="Gotfredsen, Klaus" sort="Gotfredsen, Klaus" uniqKey="Gotfredsen K" first="Klaus" last="Gotfredsen">Klaus Gotfredsen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Nörre Allé 20, DK‐2200 Copenhagen N</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: klg@odont.ku.dk</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="80">80</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="87">87</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-03">2012-03</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment screw</term><term>Aesthetic outcomes</term><term>Annual bone loss</term><term>Anterior maxilla</term><term>Astra</term><term>Astra tech</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Baseline examination</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Buccal</term><term>Buccal abscess</term><term>Central incisors</term><term>Ceramic fracture</term><term>Ceramic fractures</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical parameters</term><term>Complication rates</term><term>Crown survival</term><term>Crown survival rate</term><term>Early implant placement</term><term>Extraction</term><term>Extraction socket</term><term>Extraction sockets</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Health science</term><term>Immediate implant placement</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant crown</term><term>Implant level</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant region</term><term>Implant survival</term><term>Implant therapy</term><term>Issc</term><term>Klaus gotfredsen</term><term>Lateral incisor</term><term>Lingual side</term><term>Marginal bone</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal bone level changes</term><term>Marginal bone levels</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Mucositis</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Observation period</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral rehabil</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Other crown</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Pjetursson</term><term>Plaque</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prospective cohort study</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Reference point</term><term>Single crowns</term><term>Single tooth</term><term>Single tooth implants</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Technical complications</term><term>Technical outcomes</term><term>Tooth agenesis</term><term>Tooth extraction</term><term>Visual analogue scale</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment screw</term><term>Aesthetic outcomes</term><term>Annual bone loss</term><term>Anterior maxilla</term><term>Astra</term><term>Astra tech</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Baseline examination</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Buccal</term><term>Buccal abscess</term><term>Central incisors</term><term>Ceramic fracture</term><term>Ceramic fractures</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical parameters</term><term>Complication rates</term><term>Crown survival</term><term>Crown survival rate</term><term>Early implant placement</term><term>Extraction</term><term>Extraction socket</term><term>Extraction sockets</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Health science</term><term>Immediate implant placement</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant crown</term><term>Implant level</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant region</term><term>Implant survival</term><term>Implant therapy</term><term>Issc</term><term>Klaus gotfredsen</term><term>Lateral incisor</term><term>Lingual side</term><term>Marginal bone</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal bone level changes</term><term>Marginal bone levels</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Mucositis</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Observation period</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral rehabil</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Other crown</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Pjetursson</term><term>Plaque</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prospective cohort study</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Reference point</term><term>Single crowns</term><term>Single tooth</term><term>Single tooth implants</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Technical complications</term><term>Technical outcomes</term><term>Tooth agenesis</term><term>Tooth extraction</term><term>Visual analogue scale</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate the biological and technical outcomes of early and delayed placed single tooth implants after 10 years of follow‐up.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>issc</json:string><json:string>mucositis</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>buccal</json:string><json:string>pjetursson</json:string><json:string>tooth extraction</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>single crowns</json:string><json:string>baseline</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>abutment screw</json:string><json:string>astra tech</json:string><json:string>crown survival</json:string><json:string>fracture</json:string><json:string>astra</json:string><json:string>single tooth</json:string><json:string>implant survival</json:string><json:string>early implant placement</json:string><json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string><json:string>marginal bone level changes</json:string><json:string>marginal bone levels</json:string><json:string>oral rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>extraction sockets</json:string><json:string>technical complications</json:string><json:string>patient satisfaction</json:string><json:string>visual analogue scale</json:string><json:string>aesthetic outcomes</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>single tooth implants</json:string><json:string>reference point</json:string><json:string>marginal bone level</json:string><json:string>systematic review</json:string><json:string>baseline examination</json:string><json:string>anterior maxilla</json:string><json:string>annual bone loss</json:string><json:string>clinical parameters</json:string><json:string>central incisors</json:string><json:string>lateral incisor</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>marginal bone</json:string><json:string>extraction socket</json:string><json:string>implant region</json:string><json:string>implant crown</json:string><json:string>immediate implant placement</json:string><json:string>crown survival rate</json:string><json:string>implant level</json:string><json:string>buccal abscess</json:string><json:string>survival rate</json:string><json:string>technical outcomes</json:string><json:string>ceramic fractures</json:string><json:string>tooth agenesis</json:string><json:string>observation period</json:string><json:string>klaus gotfredsen</json:string><json:string>lingual side</json:string><json:string>other crown</json:string><json:string>ceramic fracture</json:string><json:string>health science</json:string><json:string>natural teeth</json:string><json:string>prospective cohort study</json:string><json:string>implant therapy</json:string><json:string>oral rehabil</json:string><json:string>complication rates</json:string><json:string>clin periodontol</json:string><json:string>partial dentures</json:string><json:string>clin implant dent relat</json:string><json:string>extraction</json:string><json:string>plaque</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Klaus Gotfredsen Odont dr. et lic. odont</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Nörre Allé 20, DK‐2200 Copenhagen N</json:string><json:string>E-mail: klg@odont.ku.dk</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>ceramic fracture</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>crown survival</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant survival</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>marginal bone loss</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>screw loosening</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>visual analogue scale</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID231</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-0QFH5DRT-7</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate the biological and technical outcomes of early and delayed placed single tooth implants after 10 years of follow‐up.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>5.838</score><pdfWordCount>3514</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>21375</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>585 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>27</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>162</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>6</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>A 10‐Year Prospective Study of Single Tooth Implants Placed in the Anterior Maxilla</title><pmid><json:string>19673954</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>80</first><last>87</last><total>8</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2012</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Nörre Allé</json:string><json:string>Associates Inc.</json:string><json:string>Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester</json:string><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>The Dental Imaging Company Ltd</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Associate</json:string><json:string>Erik Hjörting-Hansen</json:string><json:string>Professor Emeritus</json:string><json:string>W. L. Gore</json:string><json:string>Klaus Gotfredsen</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Flagstaff</json:string><json:string>UK</json:string><json:string>AZ</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>Copenhagen</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Pjetursson et al.</json:string><json:string>Jung et al.</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-0QFH5DRT-7</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00231.x</json:string></doi><id>647A4DE552078AF6B27F6478DD1BBF3343AF98BA</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/647A4DE552078AF6B27F6478DD1BBF3343AF98BA/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/647A4DE552078AF6B27F6478DD1BBF3343AF98BA/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/647A4DE552078AF6B27F6478DD1BBF3343AF98BA/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">A 10‐Year Prospective Study of Single Tooth Implants Placed in the Anterior Maxilla</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2012-03"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A 10‐Year Prospective Study of Single Tooth Implants Placed in the Anterior Maxilla</title><title level="a" type="short">Implant‐Supported Single Crowns after 10 Years</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Klaus</forename><surname>Gotfredsen</surname><roleName type="degree">Odont dr. et lic. odont</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Nörre Allé 20, DK‐2200 Copenhagen N</affiliation><affiliation>Professor, odont. dr. et lic. odont. Klaus Gotfredsen, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Nörre Allé 20, DK‐2200 Copenhagen N; e‐mail: klg@odont.ku.dk</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">647A4DE552078AF6B27F6478DD1BBF3343AF98BA</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-0QFH5DRT-7</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00231.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID231</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID231.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2012.14.issue-1</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="80">80</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="87">87</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-03"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p><hi rend="bold">Purpose:</hi> The aim of the study was to evaluate the biological and technical outcomes of early and delayed placed single tooth implants after 10 years of follow‐up.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and Methods:</hi> Twenty consecutive patients who needed a single tooth replacement in the anterior maxilla were included in this study. Ten implants were placed with an early placement protocol, that is, 4 weeks after tooth extraction, whereas the other 10 implants were placed with a conventional delayed placement protocol, for example, 12 weeks after tooth extraction. At the baseline and at the annual re‐examinations, pain from implant regions, mobility, plaque, mucositis, and marginal bone levels were recorded. Biological and technical complications were registered. The patients evaluated the functional and aesthetic outcomes subjectively on a visual analogue scale after 3 and 10 years.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results:</hi> All implants were still in situ after 10 years. The cumulative implant survival rate was 100%. Two implant‐supported crowns were remade because of ceramic fractures. The 10‐year crown survival rate was 90%. No significant differences in implant survival rates were found between the early and delayed protocols, regarding plaque retention, mucositis, or marginal bone levels. After 10 years, the mean marginal bone loss at both sides of the implants was less than 1.0 mm in the two groups. During the 10‐year interval, 1 patient lost more than 1.5 mm of marginal bone, 3 patients lost between 1.0 mm and 1.4 mm of bone, and 16 patients lost less than 1.0 mm of bone as an average of the mesial and distal bone loss.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusions:</hi> This 10‐year prospective clinical trial demonstrated a 100% implant survival and a 90% crown survival. The average marginal bone level change was less than 1 mm, and there was no difference between early and delayed implant placement. Patient satisfaction with the implant‐supported single crowns reduced with time.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">ceramic fracture</term><term xml:id="k2">crown survival</term><term xml:id="k3">implant survival</term><term xml:id="k4">marginal bone loss</term><term xml:id="k5">screw loosening</term><term xml:id="k6">visual analogue scale</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>ARTICLES</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/647A4DE552078AF6B27F6478DD1BBF3343AF98BA/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="03101"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.2012.14.issue-1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="14">14</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-03">March 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="8" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00231.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID231"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="8"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2009-08-06"></event><event type="publishedOnlineAcceptedOrEarlyUnpaginated" date="2009-08-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.0.1 mode:FullText" date="2012-01-24"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-01-24"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="80">80</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="87">87</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Professor, odont. dr. et lic. odont. Klaus Gotfredsen, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Nörre Allé 20, DK‐2200 Copenhagen N; e‐mail: <email>klg@odont.ku.dk</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID231.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="7"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="4"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="22"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="3868"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">A 10‐Year Prospective Study of Single Tooth Implants Placed in the Anterior Maxilla</title><title type="shortAuthors">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Volume *, Number *, 2009</title><title type="short">Implant‐Supported Single Crowns after 10 Years</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Klaus</givenNames><familyName>Gotfredsen</familyName><degrees>Odont dr. et lic. odont</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Nörre Allé 20, DK‐2200 Copenhagen N</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">ceramic fracture</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">crown survival</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">implant survival</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">marginal bone loss</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">screw loosening</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">visual analogue scale</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p><b>Purpose:</b> The aim of the study was to evaluate the biological and technical outcomes of early and delayed placed single tooth implants after 10 years of follow‐up.</p><p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> Twenty consecutive patients who needed a single tooth replacement in the anterior maxilla were included in this study. Ten implants were placed with an early placement protocol, that is, 4 weeks after tooth extraction, whereas the other 10 implants were placed with a conventional delayed placement protocol, for example, 12 weeks after tooth extraction. At the baseline and at the annual re‐examinations, pain from implant regions, mobility, plaque, mucositis, and marginal bone levels were recorded. Biological and technical complications were registered. The patients evaluated the functional and aesthetic outcomes subjectively on a visual analogue scale after 3 and 10 years.</p><p><b>Results:</b> All implants were still in situ after 10 years. The cumulative implant survival rate was 100%. Two implant‐supported crowns were remade because of ceramic fractures. The 10‐year crown survival rate was 90%. No significant differences in implant survival rates were found between the early and delayed protocols, regarding plaque retention, mucositis, or marginal bone levels. After 10 years, the mean marginal bone loss at both sides of the implants was less than 1.0 mm in the two groups. During the 10‐year interval, 1 patient lost more than 1.5 mm of marginal bone, 3 patients lost between 1.0 mm and 1.4 mm of bone, and 16 patients lost less than 1.0 mm of bone as an average of the mesial and distal bone loss.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> This 10‐year prospective clinical trial demonstrated a 100% implant survival and a 90% crown survival. The average marginal bone level change was less than 1 mm, and there was no difference between early and delayed implant placement. Patient satisfaction with the implant‐supported single crowns reduced with time.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>A 10‐Year Prospective Study of Single Tooth Implants Placed in the Anterior Maxilla</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Implant‐Supported Single Crowns after 10 Years</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>A 10‐Year Prospective Study of Single Tooth Implants Placed in the Anterior Maxilla</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Klaus</namePart><namePart type="family">Gotfredsen</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">Odont dr. et lic. odont</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Nörre Allé 20, DK‐2200 Copenhagen N</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: klg@odont.ku.dk</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-03</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">7</extent><extent unit="tables">4</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">22</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">3868</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate the biological and technical outcomes of early and delayed placed single tooth implants after 10 years of follow‐up.</abstract><abstract>Materials and Methods: Twenty consecutive patients who needed a single tooth replacement in the anterior maxilla were included in this study. Ten implants were placed with an early placement protocol, that is, 4 weeks after tooth extraction, whereas the other 10 implants were placed with a conventional delayed placement protocol, for example, 12 weeks after tooth extraction. At the baseline and at the annual re‐examinations, pain from implant regions, mobility, plaque, mucositis, and marginal bone levels were recorded. Biological and technical complications were registered. The patients evaluated the functional and aesthetic outcomes subjectively on a visual analogue scale after 3 and 10 years.</abstract><abstract>Results: All implants were still in situ after 10 years. The cumulative implant survival rate was 100%. Two implant‐supported crowns were remade because of ceramic fractures. The 10‐year crown survival rate was 90%. No significant differences in implant survival rates were found between the early and delayed protocols, regarding plaque retention, mucositis, or marginal bone levels. After 10 years, the mean marginal bone loss at both sides of the implants was less than 1.0 mm in the two groups. During the 10‐year interval, 1 patient lost more than 1.5 mm of marginal bone, 3 patients lost between 1.0 mm and 1.4 mm of bone, and 16 patients lost less than 1.0 mm of bone as an average of the mesial and distal bone loss.</abstract><abstract>Conclusions: This 10‐year prospective clinical trial demonstrated a 100% implant survival and a 90% crown survival. The average marginal bone level change was less than 1 mm, and there was no difference between early and delayed implant placement. Patient satisfaction with the implant‐supported single crowns reduced with time.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>ceramic fracture</topic><topic>crown survival</topic><topic>implant survival</topic><topic>marginal bone loss</topic><topic>screw loosening</topic><topic>visual analogue scale</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>14</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>80</start><end>87</end><total>8</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">647A4DE552078AF6B27F6478DD1BBF3343AF98BA</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-0QFH5DRT-7</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00231.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID231</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/647A4DE552078AF6B27F6478DD1BBF3343AF98BA/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003157 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003157 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:647A4DE552078AF6B27F6478DD1BBF3343AF98BA
|texte= A 10‐Year Prospective Study of Single Tooth Implants Placed in the Anterior Maxilla
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |