Patient satisfaction and quality of single‐tooth restorations
Identifieur interne : 003155 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 003154; suivant : 003156Patient satisfaction and quality of single‐tooth restorations
Auteurs : Katrien Vermylen ; Bruno Collaert ; Ulf Lindén ; Anna-Lisa Björn ; Hugo De BruynSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2003-02.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Acceptable quality, Adjacent teeth, Aesthetics, Anterior maxilla, Bone level, Branemark implants, Bruno collaert, Bruyn, Clinical examination, Clinical quality, Collaert, Dental implants, Dental technician, Facial height, Future damage, General practitioners, Hygiene measures, Implant, Implant restorations, Implant thread, Implant treatment, Implants research, Independent examiner, Independent prosthodontist, International journal, Loading time, Oral health sciences, Oral impl, Osseointegrated implants, Overall satisfaction, Patient opinion, Patient satisfaction, Patienten, Phonetics, Porcelain fracture, Postgraduate training course, Professional performance, Prosthetic, Prosthetic complications, Prosthetic treatment, Prosthodontist, Radiographic analysis radiographs, Restoration, Single crowns, Tooth implants, Treatment outcome, Treatment procedure, Vermylen, Wannfors smedberg, Xture, Xture installation, Xtures.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Acceptable quality, Adjacent teeth, Aesthetics, Anterior maxilla, Bone level, Branemark implants, Bruno collaert, Bruyn, Clinical examination, Clinical quality, Collaert, Dental implants, Dental technician, Facial height, Future damage, General practitioners, Hygiene measures, Implant, Implant restorations, Implant thread, Implant treatment, Implants research, Independent examiner, Independent prosthodontist, International journal, Loading time, Oral health sciences, Oral impl, Osseointegrated implants, Overall satisfaction, Patient opinion, Patient satisfaction, Patienten, Phonetics, Porcelain fracture, Postgraduate training course, Professional performance, Prosthetic, Prosthetic complications, Prosthetic treatment, Prosthodontist, Radiographic analysis radiographs, Restoration, Single crowns, Tooth implants, Treatment outcome, Treatment procedure, Vermylen, Wannfors smedberg, Xture, Xture installation, Xtures.
Abstract
Abstract: This retrospective study focuses on patient opinion and professionally assessed quality of single‐tooth restorations of Brånemark fixtures. Patients were treated by periodontists for fixture installation and/or abutment connection and by referring general practitioners for prosthetic rehabilitation. Seventy‐eight consecutively treated patients were sent a questionnaire regarding aesthetics, phonetics and overall satisfaction. Forty‐eight patients (52 fixtures) returned the questionnaire. Forty were able to attend a clinical examination by an independent examiner. The quality of 43 single implant crowns was evaluated according to the modified guidelines for assessment of quality and professional performance used for evaluation of design, fit, occlusion/articulation and aesthetics. Bone to implant level was assessed radiographically. Patients were very positive about aesthetics, phonetics, eating comfort and overall satisfaction. Nevertheless, 6/40 patients would not undergo the same treatment again, yet all of them would recommend it to others. The professionally rated quality of the crowns was perfect in 17 and acceptable in 25 cases. One crown needed modification to prevent future complications. Two crowns had already been replaced as a result of porcelain fracture; one restoration showed abrasion and one was damaged. With a mean loading time of 33 months (range: 3–89 months), none of the patients returning the questionnaire had encountered fixture loss. All except five fixtures showed bone remodelling at or above the first implant thread. It is concluded that single Brånemark fixtures installed by periodontists and restored by general practitioners are of an acceptable clinical quality to satisfy the patient.
Url:
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140116.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:646DA7A341FF93DDCE7CEA1265C38D0FB55EEB37Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Patient satisfaction and quality of single‐tooth restorations</title><author><name sortKey="Vermylen, Katrien" sort="Vermylen, Katrien" uniqKey="Vermylen K" first="Katrien" last="Vermylen">Katrien Vermylen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Authors' affiliations K. Vermylen, Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Center for Periodontology & Implantology Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.K. Vermylen, Department of Periodontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Department of Prosthodontics, U. Lindén, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.A.‐L. Björn, Department of Community Dentistry, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Collaert, Bruno" sort="Collaert, Bruno" uniqKey="Collaert B" first="Bruno" last="Collaert">Bruno Collaert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Authors' affiliations K. Vermylen, Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Center for Periodontology & Implantology Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.K. Vermylen, Department of Periodontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Department of Prosthodontics, U. Lindén, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.A.‐L. Björn, Department of Community Dentistry, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Linden, Ulf" sort="Linden, Ulf" uniqKey="Linden U" first="Ulf" last="Lindén">Ulf Lindén</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Authors' affiliations K. Vermylen, Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Center for Periodontology & Implantology Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.K. Vermylen, Department of Periodontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Department of Prosthodontics, U. Lindén, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.A.‐L. Björn, Department of Community Dentistry, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bjorn, Anna Isa" sort="Bjorn, Anna Isa" uniqKey="Bjorn A" first="Anna-Lisa" last="Björn">Anna-Lisa Björn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Authors' affiliations K. Vermylen, Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Center for Periodontology & Implantology Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.K. Vermylen, Department of Periodontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Department of Prosthodontics, U. Lindén, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.A.‐L. Björn, Department of Community Dentistry, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Bruyn, Hugo" sort="De Bruyn, Hugo" uniqKey="De Bruyn H" first="Hugo" last="De Bruyn">Hugo De Bruyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Authors' affiliations K. Vermylen, Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Center for Periodontology & Implantology Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.K. Vermylen, Department of Periodontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Department of Prosthodontics, U. Lindén, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.A.‐L. Björn, Department of Community Dentistry, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:646DA7A341FF93DDCE7CEA1265C38D0FB55EEB37</idno><date when="2003" year="2003">2003</date><idno type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140116.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/646DA7A341FF93DDCE7CEA1265C38D0FB55EEB37/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003155</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003155</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Patient satisfaction and quality of single‐tooth restorations</title><author><name sortKey="Vermylen, Katrien" sort="Vermylen, Katrien" uniqKey="Vermylen K" first="Katrien" last="Vermylen">Katrien Vermylen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Authors' affiliations K. Vermylen, Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Center for Periodontology & Implantology Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.K. Vermylen, Department of Periodontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Department of Prosthodontics, U. Lindén, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.A.‐L. Björn, Department of Community Dentistry, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Collaert, Bruno" sort="Collaert, Bruno" uniqKey="Collaert B" first="Bruno" last="Collaert">Bruno Collaert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Authors' affiliations K. Vermylen, Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Center for Periodontology & Implantology Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.K. Vermylen, Department of Periodontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Department of Prosthodontics, U. Lindén, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.A.‐L. Björn, Department of Community Dentistry, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Linden, Ulf" sort="Linden, Ulf" uniqKey="Linden U" first="Ulf" last="Lindén">Ulf Lindén</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Authors' affiliations K. Vermylen, Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Center for Periodontology & Implantology Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.K. Vermylen, Department of Periodontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Department of Prosthodontics, U. Lindén, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.A.‐L. Björn, Department of Community Dentistry, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bjorn, Anna Isa" sort="Bjorn, Anna Isa" uniqKey="Bjorn A" first="Anna-Lisa" last="Björn">Anna-Lisa Björn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Authors' affiliations K. Vermylen, Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Center for Periodontology & Implantology Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.K. Vermylen, Department of Periodontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Department of Prosthodontics, U. Lindén, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.A.‐L. Björn, Department of Community Dentistry, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Bruyn, Hugo" sort="De Bruyn, Hugo" uniqKey="De Bruyn H" first="Hugo" last="De Bruyn">Hugo De Bruyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Authors' affiliations K. Vermylen, Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Center for Periodontology & Implantology Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.K. Vermylen, Department of Periodontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Department of Prosthodontics, U. Lindén, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.A.‐L. Björn, Department of Community Dentistry, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="119">119</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="124">124</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-02">2003-02</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Acceptable quality</term><term>Adjacent teeth</term><term>Aesthetics</term><term>Anterior maxilla</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Branemark implants</term><term>Bruno collaert</term><term>Bruyn</term><term>Clinical examination</term><term>Clinical quality</term><term>Collaert</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental technician</term><term>Facial height</term><term>Future damage</term><term>General practitioners</term><term>Hygiene measures</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant restorations</term><term>Implant thread</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Independent examiner</term><term>Independent prosthodontist</term><term>International journal</term><term>Loading time</term><term>Oral health sciences</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Overall satisfaction</term><term>Patient opinion</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Patienten</term><term>Phonetics</term><term>Porcelain fracture</term><term>Postgraduate training course</term><term>Professional performance</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic complications</term><term>Prosthetic treatment</term><term>Prosthodontist</term><term>Radiographic analysis radiographs</term><term>Restoration</term><term>Single crowns</term><term>Tooth implants</term><term>Treatment outcome</term><term>Treatment procedure</term><term>Vermylen</term><term>Wannfors smedberg</term><term>Xture</term><term>Xture installation</term><term>Xtures</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Acceptable quality</term><term>Adjacent teeth</term><term>Aesthetics</term><term>Anterior maxilla</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Branemark implants</term><term>Bruno collaert</term><term>Bruyn</term><term>Clinical examination</term><term>Clinical quality</term><term>Collaert</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental technician</term><term>Facial height</term><term>Future damage</term><term>General practitioners</term><term>Hygiene measures</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant restorations</term><term>Implant thread</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Independent examiner</term><term>Independent prosthodontist</term><term>International journal</term><term>Loading time</term><term>Oral health sciences</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Overall satisfaction</term><term>Patient opinion</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Patienten</term><term>Phonetics</term><term>Porcelain fracture</term><term>Postgraduate training course</term><term>Professional performance</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic complications</term><term>Prosthetic treatment</term><term>Prosthodontist</term><term>Radiographic analysis radiographs</term><term>Restoration</term><term>Single crowns</term><term>Tooth implants</term><term>Treatment outcome</term><term>Treatment procedure</term><term>Vermylen</term><term>Wannfors smedberg</term><term>Xture</term><term>Xture installation</term><term>Xtures</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Abstract: This retrospective study focuses on patient opinion and professionally assessed quality of single‐tooth restorations of Brånemark fixtures. Patients were treated by periodontists for fixture installation and/or abutment connection and by referring general practitioners for prosthetic rehabilitation. Seventy‐eight consecutively treated patients were sent a questionnaire regarding aesthetics, phonetics and overall satisfaction. Forty‐eight patients (52 fixtures) returned the questionnaire. Forty were able to attend a clinical examination by an independent examiner. The quality of 43 single implant crowns was evaluated according to the modified guidelines for assessment of quality and professional performance used for evaluation of design, fit, occlusion/articulation and aesthetics. Bone to implant level was assessed radiographically. Patients were very positive about aesthetics, phonetics, eating comfort and overall satisfaction. Nevertheless, 6/40 patients would not undergo the same treatment again, yet all of them would recommend it to others. The professionally rated quality of the crowns was perfect in 17 and acceptable in 25 cases. One crown needed modification to prevent future complications. Two crowns had already been replaced as a result of porcelain fracture; one restoration showed abrasion and one was damaged. With a mean loading time of 33 months (range: 3–89 months), none of the patients returning the questionnaire had encountered fixture loss. All except five fixtures showed bone remodelling at or above the first implant thread. It is concluded that single Brånemark fixtures installed by periodontists and restored by general practitioners are of an acceptable clinical quality to satisfy the patient.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>bruyn</json:string><json:string>xture</json:string><json:string>xtures</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>patient opinion</json:string><json:string>collaert</json:string><json:string>vermylen</json:string><json:string>patienten</json:string><json:string>prosthodontist</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>prosthetic complications</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>aesthetics</json:string><json:string>clinical examination</json:string><json:string>wannfors smedberg</json:string><json:string>bone level</json:string><json:string>treatment outcome</json:string><json:string>phonetics</json:string><json:string>adjacent teeth</json:string><json:string>general practitioners</json:string><json:string>independent examiner</json:string><json:string>porcelain fracture</json:string><json:string>implant thread</json:string><json:string>xture installation</json:string><json:string>oral health sciences</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>loading time</json:string><json:string>implant treatment</json:string><json:string>facial height</json:string><json:string>hygiene measures</json:string><json:string>acceptable quality</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>dental technician</json:string><json:string>prosthetic treatment</json:string><json:string>postgraduate training course</json:string><json:string>treatment procedure</json:string><json:string>patient satisfaction</json:string><json:string>independent prosthodontist</json:string><json:string>clinical quality</json:string><json:string>radiographic analysis radiographs</json:string><json:string>overall satisfaction</json:string><json:string>professional performance</json:string><json:string>anterior maxilla</json:string><json:string>single crowns</json:string><json:string>implant restorations</json:string><json:string>tooth implants</json:string><json:string>bruno collaert</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>branemark implants</json:string><json:string>future damage</json:string><json:string>restoration</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Katrien Vermylen</name><affiliations><json:string>Authors' affiliations K. Vermylen, Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Center for Periodontology & Implantology Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.K. Vermylen, Department of Periodontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Department of Prosthodontics, U. Lindén, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.A.‐L. Björn, Department of Community Dentistry, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Bruno Collaert</name><affiliations><json:string>Authors' affiliations K. Vermylen, Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Center for Periodontology & Implantology Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.K. Vermylen, Department of Periodontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Department of Prosthodontics, U. Lindén, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.A.‐L. Björn, Department of Community Dentistry, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Ulf Lindén</name><affiliations><json:string>Authors' affiliations K. Vermylen, Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Center for Periodontology & Implantology Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.K. Vermylen, Department of Periodontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Department of Prosthodontics, U. Lindén, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.A.‐L. Björn, Department of Community Dentistry, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Anna‐Lisa Björn</name><affiliations><json:string>Authors' affiliations K. Vermylen, Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Center for Periodontology & Implantology Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.K. Vermylen, Department of Periodontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Department of Prosthodontics, U. Lindén, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.A.‐L. Björn, Department of Community Dentistry, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Hugo De Bruyn</name><affiliations><json:string>Authors' affiliations K. Vermylen, Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Center for Periodontology & Implantology Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.K. Vermylen, Department of Periodontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Department of Prosthodontics, U. Lindén, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.A.‐L. Björn, Department of Community Dentistry, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant success</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>patient opinion</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>quality</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>radiographic examination</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>815</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-L50PSF1M-3</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: This retrospective study focuses on patient opinion and professionally assessed quality of single‐tooth restorations of Brånemark fixtures. Patients were treated by periodontists for fixture installation and/or abutment connection and by referring general practitioners for prosthetic rehabilitation. Seventy‐eight consecutively treated patients were sent a questionnaire regarding aesthetics, phonetics and overall satisfaction. Forty‐eight patients (52 fixtures) returned the questionnaire. Forty were able to attend a clinical examination by an independent examiner. The quality of 43 single implant crowns was evaluated according to the modified guidelines for assessment of quality and professional performance used for evaluation of design, fit, occlusion/articulation and aesthetics. Bone to implant level was assessed radiographically. Patients were very positive about aesthetics, phonetics, eating comfort and overall satisfaction. Nevertheless, 6/40 patients would not undergo the same treatment again, yet all of them would recommend it to others. The professionally rated quality of the crowns was perfect in 17 and acceptable in 25 cases. One crown needed modification to prevent future complications. Two crowns had already been replaced as a result of porcelain fracture; one restoration showed abrasion and one was damaged. With a mean loading time of 33 months (range: 3–89 months), none of the patients returning the questionnaire had encountered fixture loss. All except five fixtures showed bone remodelling at or above the first implant thread. It is concluded that single Brånemark fixtures installed by periodontists and restored by general practitioners are of an acceptable clinical quality to satisfy the patient.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.759</score><pdfWordCount>3867</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>26462</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>6</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595 x 782 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>241</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1750</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Patient satisfaction and quality of single‐tooth restorations</title><pmid><json:string>12562374</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>119</first><last>124</last><total>6</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2003</json:string><json:string>1980s</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Californian Dental Association</json:string><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands</json:string><json:string>Malmö University</json:string><json:string>Brussels Belgium Fax</json:string><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</json:string><json:string>Department of Community Dentistry, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden Correspondence</json:string><json:string>et al.</json:string><json:string>Bruno Collaert Center for Periodontology and Implantology Brussels Kasteellaan</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>K. Vermylen</json:string><json:string>Hugo De</json:string><json:string>H. De Bruyn</json:string><json:string>L. Björn</json:string><json:string>U. Linden</json:string><json:string>Bruno Collaert</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Brussels</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Belgium</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Collaert & De Bruyn 1998</json:string><json:string>Priest 1999</json:string><json:string>Californian Dental Association 1977</json:string><json:string>Vermylen et al</json:string><json:string>Wannfors & Smedberg 1999</json:string><json:string>Ericsson et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Chang et al. 1999a</json:string><json:string>Palmer et al. (1997)</json:string><json:string>De Bruyn et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>De Bruyn et al. (2000)</json:string><json:string>De Bruyn et al. (1997, 2000)</json:string><json:string>Jemt & Petterson 1993</json:string><json:string>De Bruyn et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Palmer et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Smedberg (1999)</json:string><json:string>Chang et al. (1999a)</json:string><json:string>Moberg et al. (1999)</json:string><json:string>De Bruyn et al.2000</json:string><json:string>Moberg et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Collaert & De Bruyn 1999</json:string><json:string>Chang et al. (1999a,b)</json:string><json:string>Malo et al. 2000</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-L50PSF1M-3</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2003</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2003</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140116.x</json:string></doi><id>646DA7A341FF93DDCE7CEA1265C38D0FB55EEB37</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/646DA7A341FF93DDCE7CEA1265C38D0FB55EEB37/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/646DA7A341FF93DDCE7CEA1265C38D0FB55EEB37/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/646DA7A341FF93DDCE7CEA1265C38D0FB55EEB37/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Patient satisfaction and quality of single‐tooth restorations</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-02"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Patient satisfaction and quality of single‐tooth restorations</title><title level="a" type="sub">A 7‐year follow‐up pilot study in private dental practices</title><title level="a" type="short">Patient opinion and quality of single‐implant restorations</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Katrien</forename><surname>Vermylen</surname></persName><affiliation>Authors' affiliations K. Vermylen, Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Center for Periodontology & Implantology Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.K. Vermylen, Department of Periodontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Department of Prosthodontics, U. Lindén, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.A.‐L. Björn, Department of Community Dentistry, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Bruno</forename><surname>Collaert</surname></persName><affiliation>Authors' affiliations K. Vermylen, Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Center for Periodontology & Implantology Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.K. Vermylen, Department of Periodontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Department of Prosthodontics, U. Lindén, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.A.‐L. Björn, Department of Community Dentistry, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Ulf</forename><surname>Lindén</surname></persName><affiliation>Authors' affiliations K. Vermylen, Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Center for Periodontology & Implantology Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.K. Vermylen, Department of Periodontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Department of Prosthodontics, U. Lindén, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.A.‐L. Björn, Department of Community Dentistry, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Anna‐Lisa</forename><surname>Björn</surname></persName><affiliation>Authors' affiliations K. Vermylen, Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Center for Periodontology & Implantology Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.K. Vermylen, Department of Periodontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Department of Prosthodontics, U. Lindén, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.A.‐L. Björn, Department of Community Dentistry, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Hugo</forename><surname>De Bruyn</surname></persName><affiliation>Authors' affiliations K. Vermylen, Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Center for Periodontology & Implantology Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.K. Vermylen, Department of Periodontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Department of Prosthodontics, U. Lindén, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.A.‐L. Björn, Department of Community Dentistry, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">646DA7A341FF93DDCE7CEA1265C38D0FB55EEB37</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-L50PSF1M-3</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140116.x</idno><idno type="supplier">815</idno><idno type="unit">CLR140116</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR140116.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2003.14.issue-1</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="119">119</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="124">124</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-02"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold">Abstract:</hi> This retrospective study focuses on patient opinion and professionally assessed quality of single‐tooth restorations of Brånemark fixtures. Patients were treated by periodontists for fixture installation and/or abutment connection and by referring general practitioners for prosthetic rehabilitation. Seventy‐eight consecutively treated patients were sent a questionnaire regarding aesthetics, phonetics and overall satisfaction. Forty‐eight patients (52 fixtures) returned the questionnaire. Forty were able to attend a clinical examination by an independent examiner. The quality of 43 single implant crowns was evaluated according to the modified guidelines for assessment of quality and professional performance used for evaluation of design, fit, occlusion/articulation and aesthetics. Bone to implant level was assessed radiographically. Patients were very positive about aesthetics, phonetics, eating comfort and overall satisfaction. Nevertheless, 6/40 patients would not undergo the same treatment again, yet all of them would recommend it to others. The professionally rated quality of the crowns was perfect in 17 and acceptable in 25 cases. One crown needed modification to prevent future complications. Two crowns had already been replaced as a result of porcelain fracture; one restoration showed abrasion and one was damaged. With a mean loading time of 33 months (range: 3–89 months), none of the patients returning the questionnaire had encountered fixture loss. All except five fixtures showed bone remodelling at or above the first implant thread. It is concluded that single Brånemark fixtures installed by periodontists and restored by general practitioners are of an acceptable clinical quality to satisfy the patient.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">dental implants</term><term xml:id="k2">implant success</term><term xml:id="k3">patient opinion</term><term xml:id="k4">quality</term><term xml:id="k5">radiographic examination</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/646DA7A341FF93DDCE7CEA1265C38D0FB55EEB37/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="02001"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2003.14.issue-1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="14">14</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2003-02">February 2003</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0011900" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140116.x</doi><idGroup><id type="supplier" value="815"></id><id type="unit" value="CLR140116"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="6"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2003-01-31"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2003-01-31"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="119">119</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="124">124</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>
Bruno Collaert
Center for Periodontology and Implantology Brussels
Kasteellaan 30
Box 1
1081 Brussels
Belgium
Fax: + 32 24117667</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR140116.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted 28 January 2002</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="1"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="6"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="17"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="2911"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="12"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Patient satisfaction and quality of single‐tooth restorations</title><title type="subtitle">A 7‐year follow‐up pilot study in private dental practices</title><title type="shortAuthors">Vermylen et al</title><title type="short">Patient opinion and quality of single‐implant restorations</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>Katrien</givenNames><familyName>Vermylen</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>Bruno</givenNames><familyName>Collaert</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>Ulf</givenNames><familyName>Lindén</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>Anna‐Lisa</givenNames><familyName>Björn</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>Hugo</givenNames><familyName>De Bruyn</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="aff-1-1"><unparsedAffiliation><b>Authors' affiliations</b>
K. Vermylen, Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Center for Periodontology & Implantology Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.K. Vermylen, Department of Periodontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Department of Prosthodontics, U. Lindén, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.A.‐L. Björn, Department of Community Dentistry, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">dental implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">implant success</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">patient opinion</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">quality</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">radiographic examination</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Abstract:</b> This retrospective study focuses on patient opinion and professionally assessed quality of single‐tooth restorations of Brånemark fixtures. Patients were treated by periodontists for fixture installation and/or abutment connection and by referring general practitioners for prosthetic rehabilitation. Seventy‐eight consecutively treated patients were sent a questionnaire regarding aesthetics, phonetics and overall satisfaction. Forty‐eight patients (52 fixtures) returned the questionnaire. Forty were able to attend a clinical examination by an independent examiner. The quality of 43 single implant crowns was evaluated according to the modified guidelines for assessment of quality and professional performance used for evaluation of design, fit, occlusion/articulation and aesthetics. Bone to implant level was assessed radiographically. Patients were very positive about aesthetics, phonetics, eating comfort and overall satisfaction. Nevertheless, 6/40 patients would not undergo the same treatment again, yet all of them would recommend it to others. The professionally rated quality of the crowns was perfect in 17 and acceptable in 25 cases. One crown needed modification to prevent future complications. Two crowns had already been replaced as a result of porcelain fracture; one restoration showed abrasion and one was damaged. With a mean loading time of 33 months (range: 3–89 months), none of the patients returning the questionnaire had encountered fixture loss. All except five fixtures showed bone remodelling at or above the first implant thread. It is concluded that single Brånemark fixtures installed by periodontists and restored by general practitioners are of an acceptable clinical quality to satisfy the patient.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Patient satisfaction and quality of single‐tooth restorations</title><subTitle>A 7‐year follow‐up pilot study in private dental practices</subTitle></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Patient opinion and quality of single‐implant restorations</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Patient satisfaction and quality of single‐tooth restorations</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Katrien</namePart><namePart type="family">Vermylen</namePart><affiliation>Authors' affiliations K. Vermylen, Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Center for Periodontology & Implantology Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.K. Vermylen, Department of Periodontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Department of Prosthodontics, U. Lindén, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.A.‐L. Björn, Department of Community Dentistry, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Bruno</namePart><namePart type="family">Collaert</namePart><affiliation>Authors' affiliations K. Vermylen, Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Center for Periodontology & Implantology Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.K. Vermylen, Department of Periodontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Department of Prosthodontics, U. Lindén, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.A.‐L. Björn, Department of Community Dentistry, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Ulf</namePart><namePart type="family">Lindén</namePart><affiliation>Authors' affiliations K. Vermylen, Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Center for Periodontology & Implantology Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.K. Vermylen, Department of Periodontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Department of Prosthodontics, U. Lindén, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.A.‐L. Björn, Department of Community Dentistry, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Anna‐Lisa</namePart><namePart type="family">Björn</namePart><affiliation>Authors' affiliations K. Vermylen, Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Center for Periodontology & Implantology Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.K. Vermylen, Department of Periodontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Department of Prosthodontics, U. Lindén, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.A.‐L. Björn, Department of Community Dentistry, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Hugo</namePart><namePart type="family">De Bruyn</namePart><affiliation>Authors' affiliations K. Vermylen, Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Center for Periodontology & Implantology Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.K. Vermylen, Department of Periodontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.Bruno Collaert, H. De Bruyn, Department of Prosthodontics, U. Lindén, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.A.‐L. Björn, Department of Community Dentistry, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2003-02</dateIssued><edition>Accepted 28 January 2002</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2003</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">1</extent><extent unit="tables">6</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">17</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">2911</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Abstract: This retrospective study focuses on patient opinion and professionally assessed quality of single‐tooth restorations of Brånemark fixtures. Patients were treated by periodontists for fixture installation and/or abutment connection and by referring general practitioners for prosthetic rehabilitation. Seventy‐eight consecutively treated patients were sent a questionnaire regarding aesthetics, phonetics and overall satisfaction. Forty‐eight patients (52 fixtures) returned the questionnaire. Forty were able to attend a clinical examination by an independent examiner. The quality of 43 single implant crowns was evaluated according to the modified guidelines for assessment of quality and professional performance used for evaluation of design, fit, occlusion/articulation and aesthetics. Bone to implant level was assessed radiographically. Patients were very positive about aesthetics, phonetics, eating comfort and overall satisfaction. Nevertheless, 6/40 patients would not undergo the same treatment again, yet all of them would recommend it to others. The professionally rated quality of the crowns was perfect in 17 and acceptable in 25 cases. One crown needed modification to prevent future complications. Two crowns had already been replaced as a result of porcelain fracture; one restoration showed abrasion and one was damaged. With a mean loading time of 33 months (range: 3–89 months), none of the patients returning the questionnaire had encountered fixture loss. All except five fixtures showed bone remodelling at or above the first implant thread. It is concluded that single Brånemark fixtures installed by periodontists and restored by general practitioners are of an acceptable clinical quality to satisfy the patient.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>dental implants</topic><topic>implant success</topic><topic>patient opinion</topic><topic>quality</topic><topic>radiographic examination</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2003</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>14</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>119</start><end>124</end><total>6</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">646DA7A341FF93DDCE7CEA1265C38D0FB55EEB37</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-L50PSF1M-3</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140116.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">815</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Munksgaard International Publishers</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/646DA7A341FF93DDCE7CEA1265C38D0FB55EEB37/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003155 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003155 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:646DA7A341FF93DDCE7CEA1265C38D0FB55EEB37
|texte= Patient satisfaction and quality of single‐tooth restorations
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |