Long‐term outcomes of three types of implant‐supported mandibular overdentures in smokers
Identifieur interne : 003114 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 003113; suivant : 003115Long‐term outcomes of three types of implant‐supported mandibular overdentures in smokers
Auteurs : Geert Stoker ; Rien Van Waas ; Daniël WismeijerSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2012-08.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- 2iba, 2isb, 4itb, 4itb group, Ball attachments, Bone loss, Cigarette smoking, Clinical evaluation, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical parameters, Clinical periodontology, Clinical trial, Dental implants, Dental research, Dentistry, Edentulous, Edentulous mandible, Edentulous patients, Evaluation period, Implant, Implant failure, Implant insertion, Implant treatment, Implants research, International journal, John wiley sons, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular overdenture, Mandibular overdentures, Marginal bone loss, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial surgery, Meijer, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Other studies, Overdenture, Overdentures, Patient satisfaction, Plaque index, Radiographic, Radiographic parameters, Randomized, Smoker, Smoking, Stoker, Survival rate, Treatment strategies, Treatment strategy, Waas, Wismeijer.
- Teeft :
- 2iba, 2isb, 4itb, 4itb group, Ball attachments, Bone loss, Cigarette smoking, Clinical evaluation, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical parameters, Clinical periodontology, Clinical trial, Dental implants, Dental research, Dentistry, Edentulous, Edentulous mandible, Edentulous patients, Evaluation period, Implant, Implant failure, Implant insertion, Implant treatment, Implants research, International journal, John wiley sons, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular overdenture, Mandibular overdentures, Marginal bone loss, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial surgery, Meijer, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Other studies, Overdenture, Overdentures, Patient satisfaction, Plaque index, Radiographic, Radiographic parameters, Randomized, Smoker, Smoking, Stoker, Survival rate, Treatment strategies, Treatment strategy, Waas, Wismeijer.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to compare the differences in the long‐term clinical and radiologic effects for three different treatment strategies with implant‐supported overdentures in the edentulous mandible, with a special emphasis on smoking.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02237.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:63B941779A6AB3511F7928C5EA10C83EC50DD72ALe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Long‐term outcomes of three types of implant‐supported mandibular overdentures in smokers</title><author><name sortKey="Stoker, Geert" sort="Stoker, Geert" uniqKey="Stoker G" first="Geert" last="Stoker">Geert Stoker</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Implantology and Prosthodontics, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Research Institute MOVE, University of Amsterdam and Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Waas, Rien" sort="Van Waas, Rien" uniqKey="Van Waas R" first="Rien" last="Van Waas">Rien Van Waas</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Implantology and Prosthodontics, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Research Institute MOVE, University of Amsterdam and Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wismeijer, Daniel" sort="Wismeijer, Daniel" uniqKey="Wismeijer D" first="Daniël" last="Wismeijer">Daniël Wismeijer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Implantology and Prosthodontics, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Research Institute MOVE, University of Amsterdam and Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:63B941779A6AB3511F7928C5EA10C83EC50DD72A</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02237.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/63B941779A6AB3511F7928C5EA10C83EC50DD72A/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003114</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003114</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Long‐term outcomes of three types of implant‐supported mandibular overdentures in smokers</title><author><name sortKey="Stoker, Geert" sort="Stoker, Geert" uniqKey="Stoker G" first="Geert" last="Stoker">Geert Stoker</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Implantology and Prosthodontics, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Research Institute MOVE, University of Amsterdam and Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Waas, Rien" sort="Van Waas, Rien" uniqKey="Van Waas R" first="Rien" last="Van Waas">Rien Van Waas</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Implantology and Prosthodontics, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Research Institute MOVE, University of Amsterdam and Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wismeijer, Daniel" sort="Wismeijer, Daniel" uniqKey="Wismeijer D" first="Daniël" last="Wismeijer">Daniël Wismeijer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Implantology and Prosthodontics, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Research Institute MOVE, University of Amsterdam and Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">8</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="925">925</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="929">929</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">5</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-08">2012-08</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>2iba</term><term>2isb</term><term>4itb</term><term>4itb group</term><term>Ball attachments</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Cigarette smoking</term><term>Clinical evaluation</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical parameters</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental research</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous mandible</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Evaluation period</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant insertion</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular overdenture</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Meijer</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Plaque index</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic parameters</term><term>Randomized</term><term>Smoker</term><term>Smoking</term><term>Stoker</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Treatment strategies</term><term>Treatment strategy</term><term>Waas</term><term>Wismeijer</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>2iba</term><term>2isb</term><term>4itb</term><term>4itb group</term><term>Ball attachments</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Cigarette smoking</term><term>Clinical evaluation</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical parameters</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental research</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous mandible</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Evaluation period</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant insertion</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular overdenture</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Meijer</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Plaque index</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic parameters</term><term>Randomized</term><term>Smoker</term><term>Smoking</term><term>Stoker</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Treatment strategies</term><term>Treatment strategy</term><term>Waas</term><term>Wismeijer</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Purpose: The aim of the study was to compare the differences in the long‐term clinical and radiologic effects for three different treatment strategies with implant‐supported overdentures in the edentulous mandible, with a special emphasis on smoking.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>overdentures</json:string><json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string><json:string>4itb</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>2iba</json:string><json:string>2isb</json:string><json:string>smoker</json:string><json:string>mandibular overdentures</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>overdenture</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>meijer</json:string><json:string>wismeijer</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>radiographic</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>treatment strategy</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>ball attachments</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>stoker</json:string><json:string>waas</json:string><json:string>randomized</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>dental research</json:string><json:string>radiographic parameters</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>4itb group</json:string><json:string>clinical trial</json:string><json:string>clinical parameters</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>plaque index</json:string><json:string>mandibular overdenture</json:string><json:string>patient satisfaction</json:string><json:string>clinical evaluation</json:string><json:string>cigarette smoking</json:string><json:string>evaluation period</json:string><json:string>treatment strategies</json:string><json:string>implant insertion</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial surgery</json:string><json:string>other studies</json:string><json:string>implant treatment</json:string><json:string>implant failure</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>survival rate</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>edentulous mandible</json:string><json:string>clinical periodontology</json:string><json:string>smoking</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Geert Stoker</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral Implantology and Prosthodontics, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Research Institute MOVE, University of Amsterdam and Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Rien van Waas</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral Implantology and Prosthodontics, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Research Institute MOVE, University of Amsterdam and Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Daniël Wismeijer</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral Implantology and Prosthodontics, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Research Institute MOVE, University of Amsterdam and Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant‐supported overdentures</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>marginal bone loss</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>peri‐implant parameters</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>randomized‐controlled clinical trial</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>smoking</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR2237</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-VN3424BN-3</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Purpose: The aim of the study was to compare the differences in the long‐term clinical and radiologic effects for three different treatment strategies with implant‐supported overdentures in the edentulous mandible, with a special emphasis on smoking.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.199</score><pdfWordCount>4767</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>30455</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>5</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>36</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>250</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Long‐term outcomes of three types of implant‐supported mandibular overdentures in smokers</title><pmid><json:string>21722193</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>23</volume><issue>8</issue><pages><first>925</first><last>929</last><total>5</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2012</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>SPSS Inc., Chicago</json:string><json:string>Netherlands Geert Stoker, Danie Wismeijer, Amphia Teaching</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</json:string><json:string>ITI Foundation for the Promotion of Oral Implantology, Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Hospital, Department of Special Dental Care and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics</json:string><json:string>Research Institute MOVE, University of Amsterdam and Free University</json:string><json:string>Department of Special Dental Care and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics</json:string><json:string>Netherlands Corresponding</json:string><json:string>Simonshaven The Netherlands Tel</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Han Roos-Jansa</json:string><json:string>Danie Wismeijer</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Breda</json:string><json:string>Amsterdam</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Bain 1996</json:string><json:string>Astrand et al. (2004)</json:string><json:string>Bain et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Klemetti 2008</json:string><json:string>Visser et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Haas et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Wismeijer et al. 1997, 1999</json:string><json:string>Ferrigno et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Schou et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Feine et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Batenburg et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Strietzel et al. (2007)</json:string><json:string>Zitzmann & Berglundh 2008</json:string><json:string>Levin et al. (2008)</json:string><json:string>De Bruyn et al. (2009)</json:string><json:string>Mau et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Stoker et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Stoker et al</json:string><json:string>Meijer et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Klokkevold & Han 2007</json:string><json:string>MacFarlane et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Karoussis et al.</json:string><json:string>Luterbacher et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Wismeijer et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Carlsson et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Lehr 2000</json:string><json:string>Kullman et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Meijer et al. (2009)</json:string><json:string>Bra et al. (2006)</json:string><json:string>Telleman et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Francetti et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Buser et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Meijer et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Strietzel et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Mombelli et al. (1987)</json:string><json:string>Hinode et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Zielhuis et al. 1990</json:string><json:string>Timmerman et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Mau et al. (2003)</json:string><json:string>Wismeijer et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Cune et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Naert et al. (2004)</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-VN3424BN-3</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02237.x</json:string></doi><id>63B941779A6AB3511F7928C5EA10C83EC50DD72A</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/63B941779A6AB3511F7928C5EA10C83EC50DD72A/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/63B941779A6AB3511F7928C5EA10C83EC50DD72A/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/63B941779A6AB3511F7928C5EA10C83EC50DD72A/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Long‐term outcomes of three types of implant‐supported mandibular overdentures in smokers</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2012-08"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Long‐term outcomes of three types of implant‐supported mandibular overdentures in smokers</title><title level="a" type="short">Clinical evaluation of implant‐supported overdentures</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Geert</forename><surname>Stoker</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral Implantology and Prosthodontics, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Research Institute MOVE, University of Amsterdam and Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands<address><country key="NL"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Rien</forename><surname>van Waas</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral Implantology and Prosthodontics, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Research Institute MOVE, University of Amsterdam and Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands<address><country key="NL"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Daniël</forename><surname>Wismeijer</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral Implantology and Prosthodontics, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Research Institute MOVE, University of Amsterdam and Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands<address><country key="NL"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">63B941779A6AB3511F7928C5EA10C83EC50DD72A</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-VN3424BN-3</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02237.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR2237</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR2237.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2012.23.issue-8</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">8</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="925">925</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="929">929</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">5</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-08"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p><hi rend="bold">Purpose: </hi> The aim of the study was to compare the differences in the long‐term clinical and radiologic effects for three different treatment strategies with implant‐supported overdentures in the edentulous mandible, with a special emphasis on smoking.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and methods: </hi> In a randomized‐ controlled clinical trial, 110 edentulous patients participated. Thirty‐six patients were treated with an overdenture supported by two implants with ball attachments (2IBA), 37 patients with an overdenture supported by two implants with a bar (2ISB) and 37 patients with an overdenture supported by four implants with a triple bar (4ITB). After a mean evaluation period of 8.3 years, the clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi> Ninety‐four out of the original 110 patients (=85%) were evaluated. In the 2IBA group, the plaque index was significantly lower (vs. 2ISB, <hi rend="italic">P</hi>=0.013; vs. 4ITB, <hi rend="italic">P</hi>=0.001) than in the other groups, but there was no correlation with the other peri‐implant parameters. In the 4ITB group, the marginal bone loss was significantly higher than that in the two implant groups. The maximal probing depth was correlated with peri‐implant bone loss (<hi rend="italic">P</hi>=0.011). Smoking almost doubled marginal bone loss irrespective of the treatment strategy chosen.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusions: </hi> Patients with two implants show less marginal bone loss than those with four implants. Smoking is a risk factor for the survival of dental implants in the long run.</p><p><hi rend="bold">To cite this article</hi>:
Stoker G, van Waas R, Wismeijer D. Long‐term outcomes of three types of implant‐supported mandibular overdentures in smokers.
<hi rend="italic">Clin. Oral Impl. Res</hi>. <hi rend="bold">23</hi>, 2012; 925–929
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02237.x</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">implant‐supported overdentures</term><term xml:id="k2">marginal bone loss</term><term xml:id="k3">peri‐implant parameters</term><term xml:id="k4">randomized‐controlled clinical trial</term><term xml:id="k5">smoking</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/63B941779A6AB3511F7928C5EA10C83EC50DD72A/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="08108"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2012.23.issue-8</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="23">23</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">8</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-08">August 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="5" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02237.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR2237"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="5"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.9.1 mode:FullText" date="2011-11-15"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2012-07-03" type="xmlCorrected"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2011-07-04"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-07-04"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-07-11"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">925</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">929</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><b>Corresponding author:</b>
<i>Geert Stoker</i>
Hogeweg 5
NL‐3212 LG Simonshaven
The Netherlands
Tel.: +31 641 500 898
Fax: +31 181 630 807
e‐mail: <email normalForm="geertstoker@wxs.nl">geertstoker@wxs.nl</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR2237.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Date:</b>, Accepted 23 April 2011</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="4"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="41"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="6018"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="47"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Long‐term outcomes of three types of implant‐supported mandibular overdentures in smokers</title><title type="shortAuthors">Stoker et al.</title><title type="short">Clinical evaluation of implant‐supported overdentures</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Geert</givenNames><familyName>Stoker</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Rien</givenNames><familyName>van Waas</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Daniël</givenNames><familyName>Wismeijer</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="NL"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Oral Implantology and Prosthodontics, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Research Institute MOVE, University of Amsterdam and Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="NL"><unparsedAffiliation>Amphia Teaching Hospital, Department of Special Dental Care and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, Breda, The Netherlands</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">implant‐supported overdentures</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">marginal bone loss</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">peri‐implant parameters</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">randomized‐controlled clinical trial</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">smoking</keyword></keywordGroup><supportingInformation><p><b>Table S1.</b> Supporting information in accordance with the CONSORT Statement 2001 checklist used in reporting randomized trials.</p><p>Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.</p><p><b>Appendix S1</b>. Consort Checklist.</p><p>Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.</p><supportingInfoItem><mediaResource alt="supporting info item" href="urn-x:wiley:09057161:media:clr2237:clr_2237_sm_consort+form+remarks"></mediaResource><caption>Supporting info item</caption></supportingInfoItem></supportingInformation><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p><b>Purpose: </b> The aim of the study was to compare the differences in the long‐term clinical and radiologic effects for three different treatment strategies with implant‐supported overdentures in the edentulous mandible, with a special emphasis on smoking.</p><p><b>Materials and methods: </b> In a randomized‐ controlled clinical trial, 110 edentulous patients participated. Thirty‐six patients were treated with an overdenture supported by two implants with ball attachments (2IBA), 37 patients with an overdenture supported by two implants with a bar (2ISB) and 37 patients with an overdenture supported by four implants with a triple bar (4ITB). After a mean evaluation period of 8.3 years, the clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated.</p><p><b>Results: </b> Ninety‐four out of the original 110 patients (=85%) were evaluated. In the 2IBA group, the plaque index was significantly lower (vs. 2ISB, <i>P</i>=0.013; vs. 4ITB, <i>P</i>=0.001) than in the other groups, but there was no correlation with the other peri‐implant parameters. In the 4ITB group, the marginal bone loss was significantly higher than that in the two implant groups. The maximal probing depth was correlated with peri‐implant bone loss (<i>P</i>=0.011). Smoking almost doubled marginal bone loss irrespective of the treatment strategy chosen.</p><p><b>Conclusions: </b> Patients with two implants show less marginal bone loss than those with four implants. Smoking is a risk factor for the survival of dental implants in the long run.</p><p><b>To cite this article</b>:
Stoker G, van Waas R, Wismeijer D. Long‐term outcomes of three types of implant‐supported mandibular overdentures in smokers.
<i>Clin. Oral Impl. Res</i>. <b>23</b>, 2012; 925–929
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02237.x</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Long‐term outcomes of three types of implant‐supported mandibular overdentures in smokers</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Clinical evaluation of implant‐supported overdentures</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Long‐term outcomes of three types of implant‐supported mandibular overdentures in smokers</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Geert</namePart><namePart type="family">Stoker</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral Implantology and Prosthodontics, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Research Institute MOVE, University of Amsterdam and Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Rien</namePart><namePart type="family">van Waas</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral Implantology and Prosthodontics, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Research Institute MOVE, University of Amsterdam and Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Daniël</namePart><namePart type="family">Wismeijer</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral Implantology and Prosthodontics, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Research Institute MOVE, University of Amsterdam and Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-08</dateIssued><edition>Date:, Accepted 23 April 2011</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">0</extent><extent unit="tables">4</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">41</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">47</extent><extent unit="words">6018</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Purpose: The aim of the study was to compare the differences in the long‐term clinical and radiologic effects for three different treatment strategies with implant‐supported overdentures in the edentulous mandible, with a special emphasis on smoking.</abstract><abstract>Materials and methods: In a randomized‐ controlled clinical trial, 110 edentulous patients participated. Thirty‐six patients were treated with an overdenture supported by two implants with ball attachments (2IBA), 37 patients with an overdenture supported by two implants with a bar (2ISB) and 37 patients with an overdenture supported by four implants with a triple bar (4ITB). After a mean evaluation period of 8.3 years, the clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated.</abstract><abstract>Results: Ninety‐four out of the original 110 patients (=85%) were evaluated. In the 2IBA group, the plaque index was significantly lower (vs. 2ISB, P=0.013; vs. 4ITB, P=0.001) than in the other groups, but there was no correlation with the other peri‐implant parameters. In the 4ITB group, the marginal bone loss was significantly higher than that in the two implant groups. The maximal probing depth was correlated with peri‐implant bone loss (P=0.011). Smoking almost doubled marginal bone loss irrespective of the treatment strategy chosen.</abstract><abstract>Conclusions: Patients with two implants show less marginal bone loss than those with four implants. Smoking is a risk factor for the survival of dental implants in the long run.</abstract><abstract>To cite this article:
Stoker G, van Waas R, Wismeijer D. Long‐term outcomes of three types of implant‐supported mandibular overdentures in smokers.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23, 2012; 925–929
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02237.x</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>implant‐supported overdentures</topic><topic>marginal bone loss</topic><topic>peri‐implant parameters</topic><topic>randomized‐controlled clinical trial</topic><topic>smoking</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><note type="content"> Table S1. Supporting information in accordance with the CONSORT Statement 2001 checklist used in reporting randomized trials. Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. Appendix S1. Consort Checklist. Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. Table S1. Supporting information in accordance with the CONSORT Statement 2001 checklist used in reporting randomized trials. Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. Appendix S1. Consort Checklist. Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. Table S1. Supporting information in accordance with the CONSORT Statement 2001 checklist used in reporting randomized trials. Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. Appendix S1. Consort Checklist. Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. Table S1. Supporting information in accordance with the CONSORT Statement 2001 checklist used in reporting randomized trials. Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. Appendix S1. Consort Checklist. Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.Supporting Info Item: Supporting info item - </note><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>23</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>8</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>925</start><end>929</end><total>5</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">63B941779A6AB3511F7928C5EA10C83EC50DD72A</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-VN3424BN-3</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02237.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR2237</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/63B941779A6AB3511F7928C5EA10C83EC50DD72A/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003114 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003114 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:63B941779A6AB3511F7928C5EA10C83EC50DD72A
|texte= Long‐term outcomes of three types of implant‐supported mandibular overdentures in smokers
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |