Mk III: A Third Generation of the Self‐Tapping Brånemark System® Implant, Including the New Stargrip Internal Grip Design. A 1‐Year Prospective Four‐Center Study
Identifieur interne : 003071 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 003070; suivant : 003072Mk III: A Third Generation of the Self‐Tapping Brånemark System® Implant, Including the New Stargrip Internal Grip Design. A 1‐Year Prospective Four‐Center Study
Auteurs : Göran Widmark ; Bertil Friberg ; Björn Johansson ; Steen Sindet-Pedersen ; Sa TaylorSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2003-12.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Biocare, Branemark, Branemark implant, Branemark system, Clin, Clinical handling, Clinical implant dentistry, Edentulous, Friberg, Gothenburg, Grip design, Implant, Implant driver, Implant losses, Insertion, Internal grip design, Jemt, Mandible, Mandibular implants, Marginal bone loss, Maxilla, Maxillary implants, Maxillofac, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial surgery, Multicenter, Multicenter study, Nobel biocare, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated implants, Poor compliance, Prospective multicenter study, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Prosthesis insertion, Prosthetic, Prosthetic loading, Prosthetic reconstruction, Prosthetic reconstructions, Single crowns, Soft bone, Stargrip, Success rate, Surgical, Surgical technique, Test implants, Third generation.
- Teeft :
- Biocare, Branemark, Branemark implant, Branemark system, Clin, Clinical handling, Clinical implant dentistry, Edentulous, Friberg, Gothenburg, Grip design, Implant, Implant driver, Implant losses, Insertion, Internal grip design, Jemt, Mandible, Mandibular implants, Marginal bone loss, Maxilla, Maxillary implants, Maxillofac, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial surgery, Multicenter, Multicenter study, Nobel biocare, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated implants, Poor compliance, Prospective multicenter study, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Prosthesis insertion, Prosthetic, Prosthetic loading, Prosthetic reconstruction, Prosthetic reconstructions, Single crowns, Soft bone, Stargrip, Success rate, Surgical, Surgical technique, Test implants, Third generation.
Abstract
Background: Many prospective studies have shown predictable long‐term results of the Brånemark System (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) turned‐surface implants in totally edentulous, partially edentulous, and single cases. The Mk III self‐tapping implant was introduced by Nobel Biocare in 1999 as part of a new implant generation that improved on the Mk II self‐tapping implant that had been introduced in 1992. A new implant design should always be evaluated, preferably in prospective multicenter studies. Purpose: The aim of the present prospective multicenter study was to evaluate the short‐term success rate of the Br † nemark Mk III machined‐ and turned‐surface self‐tapping implant and to evaluate the clinical handling of the new Stargrip (Nobel Biocare AB) internal grip design. Materials and Methods: The open prospective 1‐year multicenter study was performed at four clinics. Sixty‐four patients (38 females, 26 males) with a mean age of 51 years (range, 16 to 80 years) were included. Seventeen of the patients were totally edentulous, 26 were partially edentulous, and 21 had single‐tooth losses. In total, 194 Mk III implants were inserted, 89 in the maxillas and 105 in the mandibles. Results: Fifty‐eight patients were observed for 1 year after prosthetic loading. Three of 194 implants were lost, corresponding to a cumulative success rate of 98.4% after 1 year, 100% for maxillary implants and 97.1% for mandibular implants. The implant driver carried the implants reliably in 99.5% of all treated patients. Sixty‐two patients received the planned prosthetic reconstruction. All but one prosthetic reconstruction survived after 1 year of loading. The mean marginal bone resorption, analyzed from radiographs of 143 implants, was 1.15 mm (standard deviation [SD], 1.09 mm) from the second‐stage surgery to the 1 ‐year follow‐up. Conclusion: The 1‐year success rate of the Mk III implant was high, and the clinical handling of the internal grip design (Stargrip) improved the surgical technique and was well appreciated by both surgeons and assisting staff.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00211.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:62E80F4EE06BAE55298DC35CC4684EF53D2474E1Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Mk III: A Third Generation of the Self‐Tapping Brånemark System® Implant, Including the New Stargrip Internal Grip Design. A 1‐Year Prospective Four‐Center Study</title><author><name sortKey="Widmark, Goran" sort="Widmark, Goran" uniqKey="Widmark G" first="Göran" last="Widmark">Göran Widmark</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Head and associate professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Mölndal Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; Faculty of Odontology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: goran.widmark@vgregion.se</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Friberg, Bertil" sort="Friberg, Bertil" uniqKey="Friberg B" first="Bertil" last="Friberg">Bertil Friberg</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Associate professor, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service and Faculty of Odontology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Johansson, Bjorn" sort="Johansson, Bjorn" uniqKey="Johansson B" first="Björn" last="Johansson">Björn Johansson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Associate professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sindet Edersen, Steen" sort="Sindet Edersen, Steen" uniqKey="Sindet Edersen S" first="Steen" last="Sindet-Pedersen">Steen Sindet-Pedersen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Professor and chairman, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology, Eastman Dental Institute, London, United Kingdom</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Taylor, Sa" sort="Taylor, Sa" uniqKey="Taylor " first=" Sa" last="Taylor"> Sa Taylor</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Clinical research associate, Department of Clinical Research, Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:62E80F4EE06BAE55298DC35CC4684EF53D2474E1</idno><date when="2003" year="2003">2003</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00211.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/62E80F4EE06BAE55298DC35CC4684EF53D2474E1/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003071</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003071</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Mk III: A Third Generation of the Self‐Tapping Brånemark System® Implant, Including the New Stargrip Internal Grip Design. A 1‐Year Prospective Four‐Center Study</title><author><name sortKey="Widmark, Goran" sort="Widmark, Goran" uniqKey="Widmark G" first="Göran" last="Widmark">Göran Widmark</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Head and associate professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Mölndal Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; Faculty of Odontology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: goran.widmark@vgregion.se</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Friberg, Bertil" sort="Friberg, Bertil" uniqKey="Friberg B" first="Bertil" last="Friberg">Bertil Friberg</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Associate professor, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service and Faculty of Odontology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Johansson, Bjorn" sort="Johansson, Bjorn" uniqKey="Johansson B" first="Björn" last="Johansson">Björn Johansson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Associate professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sindet Edersen, Steen" sort="Sindet Edersen, Steen" uniqKey="Sindet Edersen S" first="Steen" last="Sindet-Pedersen">Steen Sindet-Pedersen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Professor and chairman, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology, Eastman Dental Institute, London, United Kingdom</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Taylor, Sa" sort="Taylor, Sa" uniqKey="Taylor " first=" Sa" last="Taylor"> Sa Taylor</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Clinical research associate, Department of Clinical Research, Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="273">273</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="279">279</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-12">2003-12</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Biocare</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Branemark implant</term><term>Branemark system</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical handling</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Friberg</term><term>Gothenburg</term><term>Grip design</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant driver</term><term>Implant losses</term><term>Insertion</term><term>Internal grip design</term><term>Jemt</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular implants</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary implants</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Multicenter</term><term>Multicenter study</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Poor compliance</term><term>Prospective multicenter study</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis insertion</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic loading</term><term>Prosthetic reconstruction</term><term>Prosthetic reconstructions</term><term>Single crowns</term><term>Soft bone</term><term>Stargrip</term><term>Success rate</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical technique</term><term>Test implants</term><term>Third generation</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Biocare</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Branemark implant</term><term>Branemark system</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical handling</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Friberg</term><term>Gothenburg</term><term>Grip design</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant driver</term><term>Implant losses</term><term>Insertion</term><term>Internal grip design</term><term>Jemt</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular implants</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary implants</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Multicenter</term><term>Multicenter study</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Poor compliance</term><term>Prospective multicenter study</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis insertion</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic loading</term><term>Prosthetic reconstruction</term><term>Prosthetic reconstructions</term><term>Single crowns</term><term>Soft bone</term><term>Stargrip</term><term>Success rate</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical technique</term><term>Test implants</term><term>Third generation</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background: Many prospective studies have shown predictable long‐term results of the Brånemark System (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) turned‐surface implants in totally edentulous, partially edentulous, and single cases. The Mk III self‐tapping implant was introduced by Nobel Biocare in 1999 as part of a new implant generation that improved on the Mk II self‐tapping implant that had been introduced in 1992. A new implant design should always be evaluated, preferably in prospective multicenter studies. Purpose: The aim of the present prospective multicenter study was to evaluate the short‐term success rate of the Br † nemark Mk III machined‐ and turned‐surface self‐tapping implant and to evaluate the clinical handling of the new Stargrip (Nobel Biocare AB) internal grip design. Materials and Methods: The open prospective 1‐year multicenter study was performed at four clinics. Sixty‐four patients (38 females, 26 males) with a mean age of 51 years (range, 16 to 80 years) were included. Seventeen of the patients were totally edentulous, 26 were partially edentulous, and 21 had single‐tooth losses. In total, 194 Mk III implants were inserted, 89 in the maxillas and 105 in the mandibles. Results: Fifty‐eight patients were observed for 1 year after prosthetic loading. Three of 194 implants were lost, corresponding to a cumulative success rate of 98.4% after 1 year, 100% for maxillary implants and 97.1% for mandibular implants. The implant driver carried the implants reliably in 99.5% of all treated patients. Sixty‐two patients received the planned prosthetic reconstruction. All but one prosthetic reconstruction survived after 1 year of loading. The mean marginal bone resorption, analyzed from radiographs of 143 implants, was 1.15 mm (standard deviation [SD], 1.09 mm) from the second‐stage surgery to the 1 ‐year follow‐up. Conclusion: The 1‐year success rate of the Mk III implant was high, and the clinical handling of the internal grip design (Stargrip) improved the surgical technique and was well appreciated by both surgeons and assisting staff.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>branemark</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>multicenter</json:string><json:string>gothenburg</json:string><json:string>stargrip</json:string><json:string>maxillofac</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>biocare</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>friberg</json:string><json:string>jemt</json:string><json:string>nobel biocare</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>surgical technique</json:string><json:string>prosthetic reconstruction</json:string><json:string>branemark system</json:string><json:string>implant driver</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial surgery</json:string><json:string>multicenter study</json:string><json:string>success rate</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>clinical handling</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>prosthetic reconstructions</json:string><json:string>test implants</json:string><json:string>implant losses</json:string><json:string>third generation</json:string><json:string>prosthesis insertion</json:string><json:string>single crowns</json:string><json:string>insertion</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>poor compliance</json:string><json:string>prospective multicenter study</json:string><json:string>soft bone</json:string><json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string><json:string>grip design</json:string><json:string>mandibular implants</json:string><json:string>maxillary implants</json:string><json:string>prosthetic loading</json:string><json:string>internal grip design</json:string><json:string>branemark implant</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Göran Widmark DDS, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Head and associate professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Mölndal Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; Faculty of Odontology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</json:string><json:string>E-mail: goran.widmark@vgregion.se</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Bertil Friberg DDS, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Associate professor, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service and Faculty of Odontology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Björn Johansson DDS, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Associate professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Steen Sindet‐Pedersen DDS, DMSc</name><affiliations><json:string>Professor and chairman, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology, Eastman Dental Institute, London, United Kingdom</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Åsa Taylor DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Clinical research associate, Department of Clinical Research, Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant stability</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>oral implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>osseointegration</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID273</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-LJN7V7HW-T</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Background: Many prospective studies have shown predictable long‐term results of the Brånemark System (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) turned‐surface implants in totally edentulous, partially edentulous, and single cases. The Mk III self‐tapping implant was introduced by Nobel Biocare in 1999 as part of a new implant generation that improved on the Mk II self‐tapping implant that had been introduced in 1992. A new implant design should always be evaluated, preferably in prospective multicenter studies. Purpose: The aim of the present prospective multicenter study was to evaluate the short‐term success rate of the Br † nemark Mk III machined‐ and turned‐surface self‐tapping implant and to evaluate the clinical handling of the new Stargrip (Nobel Biocare AB) internal grip design. Materials and Methods: The open prospective 1‐year multicenter study was performed at four clinics. Sixty‐four patients (38 females, 26 males) with a mean age of 51 years (range, 16 to 80 years) were included. Seventeen of the patients were totally edentulous, 26 were partially edentulous, and 21 had single‐tooth losses. In total, 194 Mk III implants were inserted, 89 in the maxillas and 105 in the mandibles. Results: Fifty‐eight patients were observed for 1 year after prosthetic loading. Three of 194 implants were lost, corresponding to a cumulative success rate of 98.4% after 1 year, 100% for maxillary implants and 97.1% for mandibular implants. The implant driver carried the implants reliably in 99.5% of all treated patients. Sixty‐two patients received the planned prosthetic reconstruction. All but one prosthetic reconstruction survived after 1 year of loading. The mean marginal bone resorption, analyzed from radiographs of 143 implants, was 1.15 mm (standard deviation [SD], 1.09 mm) from the second‐stage surgery to the 1 ‐year follow‐up. Conclusion: The 1‐year success rate of the Mk III implant was high, and the clinical handling of the internal grip design (Stargrip) improved the surgical technique and was well appreciated by both surgeons and assisting staff.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.556</score><pdfWordCount>3556</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>22999</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>576 x 791.759 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>317</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>2081</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>3</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Mk III: A Third Generation of the Self‐Tapping Brånemark System® Implant, Including the New Stargrip Internal Grip Design. A 1‐Year Prospective Four‐Center Study</title><pmid><json:string>15127999</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><pages><first>273</first><last>279</last><total>7</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1992</json:string><json:string>1997</json:string><json:string>between February 2000 and December 2001</json:string><json:string>between June 1999 and November 2000</json:string><json:string>1999</json:string><json:string>2003</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>University of Gothenburg</json:string><json:string>University Hospital of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden</json:string><json:string>Molndal Hospital, Molndal, Sweden</json:string><json:string>Joint Research and Ethics Committee</json:string><json:string>BC Decker Inc</json:string><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</json:string><json:string>World Medical Association</json:string><json:string>Eastman Dental Institute and Hospital</json:string><json:string>Eastman Dental Institute, London, United Kingdom</json:string><json:string>Department of Clinical Research, Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg,Sweden Reprint</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Bjorn Johansson</json:string><json:string>Ivanoff</json:string><json:string>Friberg</json:string><json:string>Albrektsson</json:string><json:string>Goran Widmark</json:string><json:string>Bertil Friberg</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Uppsala</json:string><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Helsinki</json:string><json:string>Gothenburg</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-LJN7V7HW-T</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2003</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2003</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00211.x</json:string></doi><id>62E80F4EE06BAE55298DC35CC4684EF53D2474E1</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/62E80F4EE06BAE55298DC35CC4684EF53D2474E1/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/62E80F4EE06BAE55298DC35CC4684EF53D2474E1/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/62E80F4EE06BAE55298DC35CC4684EF53D2474E1/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Mk III: A Third Generation of the Self‐Tapping Brånemark System® Implant, Including the New Stargrip Internal Grip Design. A 1‐Year Prospective Four‐Center Study</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-12"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Mk III: A Third Generation of the Self‐Tapping Brånemark System® Implant, Including the New Stargrip Internal Grip Design. A 1‐Year Prospective Four‐Center Study</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Göran</forename><surname>Widmark</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Head and associate professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Mölndal Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; Faculty of Odontology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Reprint requests: Göran Widmark, DDS, PhD, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Mölndal Hospital, 431 80 Mölndal, Sweden; E‐mail: goran.widmark@vgregion.se</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Bertil</forename><surname>Friberg</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Associate professor, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service and Faculty of Odontology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Björn</forename><surname>Johansson</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Associate professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Steen</forename><surname>Sindet‐Pedersen</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, DMSc</roleName></persName><affiliation>Professor and chairman, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology, Eastman Dental Institute, London, United Kingdom<address><country key="GB"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Åsa</forename><surname>Taylor</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Clinical research associate, Department of Clinical Research, Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">62E80F4EE06BAE55298DC35CC4684EF53D2474E1</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-LJN7V7HW-T</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00211.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID273</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID273.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2003.5.issue-4</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="273">273</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="279">279</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-12"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p>
<hi rend="italic">Background</hi>: Many prospective studies have shown predictable long‐term results of the Brånemark System (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) turned‐surface implants in totally edentulous, partially edentulous, and single cases. The Mk III self‐tapping implant was introduced by Nobel Biocare in 1999 as part of a new implant generation that improved on the Mk II self‐tapping implant that had been introduced in 1992. A new implant design should always be evaluated, preferably in prospective multicenter studies.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Purpose</hi>: The aim of the present prospective multicenter study was to evaluate the short‐term success rate of the Br † nemark Mk III machined‐ and turned‐surface self‐tapping implant and to evaluate the clinical handling of the new Stargrip (Nobel Biocare AB) internal grip design.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Materials and Methods</hi>: The open prospective 1‐year multicenter study was performed at four clinics. Sixty‐four patients (38 females, 26 males) with a mean age of 51 years (range, 16 to 80 years) were included. Seventeen of the patients were totally edentulous, 26 were partially edentulous, and 21 had single‐tooth losses. In total, 194 Mk III implants were inserted, 89 in the maxillas and 105 in the mandibles.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Results</hi>: Fifty‐eight patients were observed for 1 year after prosthetic loading. Three of 194 implants were lost, corresponding to a cumulative success rate of 98.4% after 1 year, 100% for maxillary implants and 97.1% for mandibular implants. The implant driver carried the implants reliably in 99.5% of all treated patients. Sixty‐two patients received the planned prosthetic reconstruction. All but one prosthetic reconstruction survived after 1 year of loading. The mean marginal bone resorption, analyzed from radiographs of 143 implants, was 1.15 mm (standard deviation [SD], 1.09 mm) from the second‐stage surgery to the 1 ‐year follow‐up.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Conclusion</hi>: The 1‐year success rate of the Mk III implant was high, and the clinical handling of the internal grip design (Stargrip) improved the surgical technique and was well appreciated by both surgeons and assisting staff.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">implant stability</term><term xml:id="k2">oral implants</term><term xml:id="k3">osseointegration</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/62E80F4EE06BAE55298DC35CC4684EF53D2474E1/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="12004"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.2003.5.issue-4</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="5">5</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="4">4</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2003-12">December 2003</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0027300" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00211.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID273"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="7"></count></countGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2006-10-30"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2006-10-30"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-13"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="273">273</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="279">279</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Reprint requests: Göran Widmark, DDS, PhD, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Mölndal Hospital, 431 80 Mölndal, Sweden; E‐mail: <email>goran.widmark@vgregion.se</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID273.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="24"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="6"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Mk III: A Third Generation of the Self‐Tapping Brånemark System® Implant, Including the New Stargrip Internal Grip Design. A 1‐Year Prospective Four‐Center Study</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Göran</givenNames><familyName>Widmark</familyName><degrees>DDS, PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Bertil</givenNames><familyName>Friberg</familyName><degrees>DDS, PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Björn</givenNames><familyName>Johansson</familyName><degrees>DDS, PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a4"><personName><givenNames>Steen</givenNames><familyName>Sindet‐Pedersen</familyName><degrees>DDS, DMSc</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a5"><personName><givenNames>Åsa</givenNames><familyName>Taylor</familyName><degrees>DDS</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Head and associate professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Mölndal Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; Faculty of Odontology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Associate professor, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service and Faculty of Odontology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Associate professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="GB"><unparsedAffiliation>Professor and chairman, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology, Eastman Dental Institute, London, United Kingdom</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a5" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Clinical research associate, Department of Clinical Research, Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">implant stability</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">oral implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">osseointegration</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p> <i>Background</i>: Many prospective studies have shown predictable long‐term results of the Brånemark System (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) turned‐surface implants in totally edentulous, partially edentulous, and single cases. The Mk III self‐tapping implant was introduced by Nobel Biocare in 1999 as part of a new implant generation that improved on the Mk II self‐tapping implant that had been introduced in 1992. A new implant design should always be evaluated, preferably in prospective multicenter studies.</p><p> <i>Purpose</i>: The aim of the present prospective multicenter study was to evaluate the short‐term success rate of the Br † nemark Mk III machined‐ and turned‐surface self‐tapping implant and to evaluate the clinical handling of the new Stargrip (Nobel Biocare AB) internal grip design.</p><p> <i>Materials and Methods</i>: The open prospective 1‐year multicenter study was performed at four clinics. Sixty‐four patients (38 females, 26 males) with a mean age of 51 years (range, 16 to 80 years) were included. Seventeen of the patients were totally edentulous, 26 were partially edentulous, and 21 had single‐tooth losses. In total, 194 Mk III implants were inserted, 89 in the maxillas and 105 in the mandibles.</p><p> <i>Results</i>: Fifty‐eight patients were observed for 1 year after prosthetic loading. Three of 194 implants were lost, corresponding to a cumulative success rate of 98.4% after 1 year, 100% for maxillary implants and 97.1% for mandibular implants. The implant driver carried the implants reliably in 99.5% of all treated patients. Sixty‐two patients received the planned prosthetic reconstruction. All but one prosthetic reconstruction survived after 1 year of loading. The mean marginal bone resorption, analyzed from radiographs of 143 implants, was 1.15 mm (standard deviation [SD], 1.09 mm) from the second‐stage surgery to the 1 ‐year follow‐up.</p><p> <i>Conclusion</i>: The 1‐year success rate of the Mk III implant was high, and the clinical handling of the internal grip design (Stargrip) improved the surgical technique and was well appreciated by both surgeons and assisting staff.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Mk III: A Third Generation of the Self‐Tapping Brånemark System® Implant, Including the New Stargrip Internal Grip Design. A 1‐Year Prospective Four‐Center Study</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Mk III: A Third Generation of the Self‐Tapping Brånemark System® Implant, Including the New Stargrip Internal Grip Design. A 1‐Year Prospective Four‐Center Study</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Göran</namePart><namePart type="family">Widmark</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart><affiliation>Head and associate professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Mölndal Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; Faculty of Odontology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: goran.widmark@vgregion.se</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Bertil</namePart><namePart type="family">Friberg</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart><affiliation>Associate professor, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service and Faculty of Odontology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Björn</namePart><namePart type="family">Johansson</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart><affiliation>Associate professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Steen</namePart><namePart type="family">Sindet‐Pedersen</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, DMSc</namePart><affiliation>Professor and chairman, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology, Eastman Dental Institute, London, United Kingdom</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Åsa</namePart><namePart type="family">Taylor</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>Clinical research associate, Department of Clinical Research, Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2003-12</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2003</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="references">24</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">6</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Background: Many prospective studies have shown predictable long‐term results of the Brånemark System (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) turned‐surface implants in totally edentulous, partially edentulous, and single cases. The Mk III self‐tapping implant was introduced by Nobel Biocare in 1999 as part of a new implant generation that improved on the Mk II self‐tapping implant that had been introduced in 1992. A new implant design should always be evaluated, preferably in prospective multicenter studies. Purpose: The aim of the present prospective multicenter study was to evaluate the short‐term success rate of the Br † nemark Mk III machined‐ and turned‐surface self‐tapping implant and to evaluate the clinical handling of the new Stargrip (Nobel Biocare AB) internal grip design. Materials and Methods: The open prospective 1‐year multicenter study was performed at four clinics. Sixty‐four patients (38 females, 26 males) with a mean age of 51 years (range, 16 to 80 years) were included. Seventeen of the patients were totally edentulous, 26 were partially edentulous, and 21 had single‐tooth losses. In total, 194 Mk III implants were inserted, 89 in the maxillas and 105 in the mandibles. Results: Fifty‐eight patients were observed for 1 year after prosthetic loading. Three of 194 implants were lost, corresponding to a cumulative success rate of 98.4% after 1 year, 100% for maxillary implants and 97.1% for mandibular implants. The implant driver carried the implants reliably in 99.5% of all treated patients. Sixty‐two patients received the planned prosthetic reconstruction. All but one prosthetic reconstruction survived after 1 year of loading. The mean marginal bone resorption, analyzed from radiographs of 143 implants, was 1.15 mm (standard deviation [SD], 1.09 mm) from the second‐stage surgery to the 1 ‐year follow‐up. Conclusion: The 1‐year success rate of the Mk III implant was high, and the clinical handling of the internal grip design (Stargrip) improved the surgical technique and was well appreciated by both surgeons and assisting staff.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>implant stability</topic><topic>oral implants</topic><topic>osseointegration</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2003</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>5</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>273</start><end>279</end><total>7</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">62E80F4EE06BAE55298DC35CC4684EF53D2474E1</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-LJN7V7HW-T</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00211.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID273</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/62E80F4EE06BAE55298DC35CC4684EF53D2474E1/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003071 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003071 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:62E80F4EE06BAE55298DC35CC4684EF53D2474E1
|texte= Mk III: A Third Generation of the Self‐Tapping Brånemark System® Implant, Including the New Stargrip Internal Grip Design. A 1‐Year Prospective Four‐Center Study
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |