Experience with 220 cases of mandibular reconstruction
Identifieur interne : 003000 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002F99; suivant : 003001Experience with 220 cases of mandibular reconstruction
Auteurs : Michel BenoistSource :
- Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery [ 0301-0503 ] ; 1978.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Aesthetic consequences, Alveolar process, Benign tumours, Benoist, Better results, Bone graft, Bone grafts, Bony outlines, Chromecobalt alloy, Costal graft, Dental arches, Distal part, Edentulous mandibulectomy patients, Fixation, Fixation part, Fixation parts, Good position, Graft, Horizontal ramus, Immediate reconstruction, Implant, Implants, Intermaxillary fixation, Intraoral, Intraoral route, Inverse position, Local conditions, Malignant tumours, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular angle, Mandibular arch, Mandibular defects, Mandibular fragments, Mandibular reconstruction, Mandibular reconstruction experience, Metallic implant, Metallic splint, Normal outline, Obwegeser, Operative indications, Opposite side, Oral surg, Oralen operationsweg, Other hand, Primary repair, Prosthesis, Prosthetic management, Ramus, Resection, Same alloy, Second period, Secondary breakdown, Simultaneous resection, Soft tissues, Surg, Tumour.
- Teeft :
- Aesthetic consequences, Alveolar process, Benign tumours, Benoist, Better results, Bone graft, Bone grafts, Bony outlines, Chromecobalt alloy, Costal graft, Dental arches, Distal part, Edentulous mandibulectomy patients, Fixation, Fixation part, Fixation parts, Good position, Graft, Horizontal ramus, Immediate reconstruction, Implant, Intermaxillary fixation, Intraoral, Intraoral route, Inverse position, Local conditions, Malignant tumours, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular angle, Mandibular arch, Mandibular fragments, Mandibular reconstruction, Mandibular reconstruction experience, Metallic implant, Metallic splint, Normal outline, Obwegeser, Operative indications, Opposite side, Oral surg, Oralen operationsweg, Other hand, Primary repair, Prosthesis, Prosthetic management, Ramus, Resection, Same alloy, Second period, Secondary breakdown, Simultaneous resection, Soft tissues, Surg, Tumour.
Abstract
Summary: Extensive resections of the mandible are usually carried out for malignant tumours or non-malignant tumours with a tendency to reccur, such as ameloblastomas. These hemi-resections include the ascending and horizontal ramus of the mandible. Such mutilations have serious functional and aesthetic consequences. In order to avoid these drawbacks we use two sorts of implants. The first are made from metallic and plastic materials. They are used when patients are too weak to support a bone graft, when there is insufficient soft tissue coverage, or when a recurrence of the tumour is feared. In order to be well tolerated they must be made of materials which are fully accepted by the tissues. For the plastic part we use methyl-methacrylate and, for the metal part, “durallium”. The second type is used to maintain a bone graft in good position. It is completely metallic. The pattern is made in wax and reproduced in durallium. They are made and adjusted in the same way as plastic implants. The results are analysed separately covering two periods. In the first (1955–1967), the failures have been relatively large (25%). During the second period (1967–1974), a better choice of operative indications and a more precise technique gave better results (failure: 13%).
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-0503(78)80067-8
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:6182BC89C84148B0F56E88BE633983E69C4ACF80Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Experience with 220 cases of mandibular reconstruction</title><author><name sortKey="Benoist, Michel" sort="Benoist, Michel" uniqKey="Benoist M" first="Michel" last="Benoist">Michel Benoist</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Clinic of Stomatology and Maxillo-Facial Surgery (Head: Prof. P. Cernéa, M.D.) University of Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:6182BC89C84148B0F56E88BE633983E69C4ACF80</idno><date when="1978" year="1978">1978</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/S0301-0503(78)80067-8</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/6182BC89C84148B0F56E88BE633983E69C4ACF80/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003000</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003000</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Experience with 220 cases of mandibular reconstruction</title><author><name sortKey="Benoist, Michel" sort="Benoist, Michel" uniqKey="Benoist M" first="Michel" last="Benoist">Michel Benoist</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Clinic of Stomatology and Maxillo-Facial Surgery (Head: Prof. P. Cernéa, M.D.) University of Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">JMSUR</title><idno type="ISSN">0301-0503</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1978">1978</date><biblScope unit="volume">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="supplement">C</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="40">40</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="49">49</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0301-0503</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0301-0503</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aesthetic consequences</term><term>Alveolar process</term><term>Benign tumours</term><term>Benoist</term><term>Better results</term><term>Bone graft</term><term>Bone grafts</term><term>Bony outlines</term><term>Chromecobalt alloy</term><term>Costal graft</term><term>Dental arches</term><term>Distal part</term><term>Edentulous mandibulectomy patients</term><term>Fixation</term><term>Fixation part</term><term>Fixation parts</term><term>Good position</term><term>Graft</term><term>Horizontal ramus</term><term>Immediate reconstruction</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implants</term><term>Intermaxillary fixation</term><term>Intraoral</term><term>Intraoral route</term><term>Inverse position</term><term>Local conditions</term><term>Malignant tumours</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular angle</term><term>Mandibular arch</term><term>Mandibular defects</term><term>Mandibular fragments</term><term>Mandibular reconstruction</term><term>Mandibular reconstruction experience</term><term>Metallic implant</term><term>Metallic splint</term><term>Normal outline</term><term>Obwegeser</term><term>Operative indications</term><term>Opposite side</term><term>Oral surg</term><term>Oralen operationsweg</term><term>Other hand</term><term>Primary repair</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic management</term><term>Ramus</term><term>Resection</term><term>Same alloy</term><term>Second period</term><term>Secondary breakdown</term><term>Simultaneous resection</term><term>Soft tissues</term><term>Surg</term><term>Tumour</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Aesthetic consequences</term><term>Alveolar process</term><term>Benign tumours</term><term>Benoist</term><term>Better results</term><term>Bone graft</term><term>Bone grafts</term><term>Bony outlines</term><term>Chromecobalt alloy</term><term>Costal graft</term><term>Dental arches</term><term>Distal part</term><term>Edentulous mandibulectomy patients</term><term>Fixation</term><term>Fixation part</term><term>Fixation parts</term><term>Good position</term><term>Graft</term><term>Horizontal ramus</term><term>Immediate reconstruction</term><term>Implant</term><term>Intermaxillary fixation</term><term>Intraoral</term><term>Intraoral route</term><term>Inverse position</term><term>Local conditions</term><term>Malignant tumours</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular angle</term><term>Mandibular arch</term><term>Mandibular fragments</term><term>Mandibular reconstruction</term><term>Mandibular reconstruction experience</term><term>Metallic implant</term><term>Metallic splint</term><term>Normal outline</term><term>Obwegeser</term><term>Operative indications</term><term>Opposite side</term><term>Oral surg</term><term>Oralen operationsweg</term><term>Other hand</term><term>Primary repair</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic management</term><term>Ramus</term><term>Resection</term><term>Same alloy</term><term>Second period</term><term>Secondary breakdown</term><term>Simultaneous resection</term><term>Soft tissues</term><term>Surg</term><term>Tumour</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Summary: Extensive resections of the mandible are usually carried out for malignant tumours or non-malignant tumours with a tendency to reccur, such as ameloblastomas. These hemi-resections include the ascending and horizontal ramus of the mandible. Such mutilations have serious functional and aesthetic consequences. In order to avoid these drawbacks we use two sorts of implants. The first are made from metallic and plastic materials. They are used when patients are too weak to support a bone graft, when there is insufficient soft tissue coverage, or when a recurrence of the tumour is feared. In order to be well tolerated they must be made of materials which are fully accepted by the tissues. For the plastic part we use methyl-methacrylate and, for the metal part, “durallium”. The second type is used to maintain a bone graft in good position. It is completely metallic. The pattern is made in wax and reproduced in durallium. They are made and adjusted in the same way as plastic implants. The results are analysed separately covering two periods. In the first (1955–1967), the failures have been relatively large (25%). During the second period (1967–1974), a better choice of operative indications and a more precise technique gave better results (failure: 13%).</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>resection</json:string><json:string>fixation</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>graft</json:string><json:string>ramus</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>bone graft</json:string><json:string>tumour</json:string><json:string>benoist</json:string><json:string>surg</json:string><json:string>obwegeser</json:string><json:string>fixation part</json:string><json:string>intraoral</json:string><json:string>horizontal ramus</json:string><json:string>malignant tumours</json:string><json:string>intraoral route</json:string><json:string>metallic splint</json:string><json:string>other hand</json:string><json:string>metallic implant</json:string><json:string>edentulous mandibulectomy patients</json:string><json:string>distal part</json:string><json:string>aesthetic consequences</json:string><json:string>prosthetic management</json:string><json:string>mandibular reconstruction</json:string><json:string>bone grafts</json:string><json:string>oral surg</json:string><json:string>immediate reconstruction</json:string><json:string>better results</json:string><json:string>operative indications</json:string><json:string>intermaxillary fixation</json:string><json:string>mandibular angle</json:string><json:string>bony outlines</json:string><json:string>soft tissues</json:string><json:string>normal outline</json:string><json:string>opposite side</json:string><json:string>inverse position</json:string><json:string>second period</json:string><json:string>chromecobalt alloy</json:string><json:string>good position</json:string><json:string>benign tumours</json:string><json:string>fixation parts</json:string><json:string>same alloy</json:string><json:string>simultaneous resection</json:string><json:string>mandibular fragments</json:string><json:string>mandibular reconstruction experience</json:string><json:string>primary repair</json:string><json:string>dental arches</json:string><json:string>alveolar process</json:string><json:string>costal graft</json:string><json:string>secondary breakdown</json:string><json:string>local conditions</json:string><json:string>oralen operationsweg</json:string><json:string>mandibular arch</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Michel Benoist</name><affiliations><json:string>Clinic of Stomatology and Maxillo-Facial Surgery (Head: Prof. P. Cernéa, M.D.) University of Paris, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Mandibular defects</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Bone graft</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Mandibular reconstruction</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>78800678</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/6H6-HD2N96GN-M</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>Full-length article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Summary: Extensive resections of the mandible are usually carried out for malignant tumours or non-malignant tumours with a tendency to reccur, such as ameloblastomas. These hemi-resections include the ascending and horizontal ramus of the mandible. Such mutilations have serious functional and aesthetic consequences. In order to avoid these drawbacks we use two sorts of implants. The first are made from metallic and plastic materials. They are used when patients are too weak to support a bone graft, when there is insufficient soft tissue coverage, or when a recurrence of the tumour is feared. In order to be well tolerated they must be made of materials which are fully accepted by the tissues. For the plastic part we use methyl-methacrylate and, for the metal part, “durallium”. The second type is used to maintain a bone graft in good position. It is completely metallic. The pattern is made in wax and reproduced in durallium. They are made and adjusted in the same way as plastic implants. The results are analysed separately covering two periods. In the first (1955–1967), the failures have been relatively large (25%). During the second period (1967–1974), a better choice of operative indications and a more precise technique gave better results (failure: 13%).</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.458</score><pdfWordCount>4010</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>23877</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>576 x 792 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>204</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1276</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Experience with 220 cases of mandibular reconstruction</title><pmid><json:string>274506</json:string></pmid><pii><json:string>S0301-0503(78)80067-8</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><publicationDate>1978</publicationDate><issn><json:string>0301-0503</json:string></issn><pii><json:string>S0301-0503(78)X8057-X</json:string></pii><volume>6</volume><pages><first>40</first><last>49</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1955</json:string><json:string>1978</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Claude Martin</json:string><json:string>J. Plast</json:string><json:string>M. Benoist</json:string><json:string>Benoist Fig</json:string><json:string>K. Schuchardt</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Stuttgart</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Obwegeser 1966</json:string><json:string>Indication and Results 1968</json:string><json:string>Benoist 1973</json:string><json:string>Cernea et al. 1966</json:string><json:string>1965, 1970</json:string><json:string>Cantor and Curtis (1971)</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/6H6-HD2N96GN-M</json:string></ark><categories><wos></wos><scienceMetrix></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - General Medicine</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - Surgery</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1978</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1978</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1016/S0301-0503(78)80067-8</json:string></doi><id>6182BC89C84148B0F56E88BE633983E69C4ACF80</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/6182BC89C84148B0F56E88BE633983E69C4ACF80/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/6182BC89C84148B0F56E88BE633983E69C4ACF80/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/6182BC89C84148B0F56E88BE633983E69C4ACF80/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Experience with 220 cases of mandibular reconstruction</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>©1978 Georg Thieme Publishers</p></availability><date>1978</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note>Paper read at the 3rd Congress of the E.A.M.F.S., London, September 1976.</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Experience with 220 cases of mandibular reconstruction</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Michel</forename><surname>Benoist</surname></persName><note type="biography">Michel Benoist, M.D., D.M.D. Service de Stomatologie et de Prothèse Maxillo-Faciale Groupe Hospitalier Pitie-Salpetrière 47, Boulevard de l'Hôpital F-75634 Paris Cedex 13</note><affiliation>Michel Benoist, M.D., D.M.D. Service de Stomatologie et de Prothèse Maxillo-Faciale Groupe Hospitalier Pitie-Salpetrière 47, Boulevard de l'Hôpital F-75634 Paris Cedex 13</affiliation><affiliation>Clinic of Stomatology and Maxillo-Facial Surgery (Head: Prof. P. Cernéa, M.D.) University of Paris, France</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">6182BC89C84148B0F56E88BE633983E69C4ACF80</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0301-0503(78)80067-8</idno><idno type="PII">S0301-0503(78)80067-8</idno><idno type="ArticleID">78800678</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">JMSUR</title><idno type="pISSN">0301-0503</idno><idno type="PII">S0301-0503(78)X8057-X</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1978"></date><biblScope unit="volume">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="supplement">C</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="40">40</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="49">49</biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1978</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Summary: Extensive resections of the mandible are usually carried out for malignant tumours or non-malignant tumours with a tendency to reccur, such as ameloblastomas. These hemi-resections include the ascending and horizontal ramus of the mandible. Such mutilations have serious functional and aesthetic consequences. In order to avoid these drawbacks we use two sorts of implants. The first are made from metallic and plastic materials. They are used when patients are too weak to support a bone graft, when there is insufficient soft tissue coverage, or when a recurrence of the tumour is feared. In order to be well tolerated they must be made of materials which are fully accepted by the tissues. For the plastic part we use methyl-methacrylate and, for the metal part, “durallium”. The second type is used to maintain a bone graft in good position. It is completely metallic. The pattern is made in wax and reproduced in durallium. They are made and adjusted in the same way as plastic implants. The results are analysed separately covering two periods. In the first (1955–1967), the failures have been relatively large (25%). During the second period (1967–1974), a better choice of operative indications and a more precise technique gave better results (failure: 13%).</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Key-Words</head><item><term>Mandibular defects</term></item><item><term>Implants</term></item><item><term>Bone graft</term></item><item><term>Mandibular reconstruction</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1978">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/6182BC89C84148B0F56E88BE633983E69C4ACF80/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier doc found" wicri:toSee="Elsevier, no converted or simple article"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 5.0.1//EN//XML" URI="art501.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><article version="5.0" xml:lang="en" docsubtype="fla"><item-info><jid>JMSUR</jid><aid>78800678</aid><ce:pii>S0301-0503(78)80067-8</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1016/S0301-0503(78)80067-8</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="unknown" year="1978">Georg Thieme Publishers</ce:copyright></item-info><head><ce:article-footnote><ce:label>*</ce:label><ce:note-para>Paper read at the 3rd Congress of the E.A.M.F.S., London, September 1976.</ce:note-para></ce:article-footnote><ce:title>Experience with 220 cases of mandibular reconstruction</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>Michel</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Benoist</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="fn1"><ce:sup>1</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:affiliation id="aff1"><ce:textfn>Clinic of Stomatology and Maxillo-Facial Surgery (Head: Prof. P. Cernéa, M.D.) University of Paris, France</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:footnote id="fn1"><ce:label>1</ce:label><ce:note-para>Michel Benoist, M.D., D.M.D. Service de Stomatologie et de Prothèse Maxillo-Faciale Groupe Hospitalier Pitie-Salpetrière 47, Boulevard de l'Hôpital F-75634 Paris Cedex 13</ce:note-para></ce:footnote></ce:author-group><ce:abstract id="ab1" class="author" xml:lang="en"><ce:section-title>Summary</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para>Extensive resections of the mandible are usually carried out for malignant tumours or non-malignant tumours with a tendency to reccur, such as ameloblastomas. These hemi-resections include the ascending and horizontal ramus of the mandible. Such mutilations have serious functional and aesthetic consequences. In order to avoid these drawbacks we use two sorts of implants. The first are made from metallic and plastic materials. They are used when patients are too weak to support a bone graft, when there is insufficient soft tissue coverage, or when a recurrence of the tumour is feared. In order to be well tolerated they must be made of materials which are fully accepted by the tissues. For the plastic part we use methyl-methacrylate and, for the metal part, “durallium”. The second type is used to maintain a bone graft in good position. It is completely metallic. The pattern is made in wax and reproduced in durallium. They are made and adjusted in the same way as plastic implants. The results are analysed separately covering two periods. In the first (1955–1967), the failures have been relatively large (25%). During the second period (1967–1974), a better choice of operative indications and a more precise technique gave better results (failure: 13%).</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract><ce:keywords class="keyword" xml:lang="en"><ce:section-title>Key-Words</ce:section-title><ce:keyword><ce:text>Mandibular defects</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Implants</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Bone graft</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Mandibular reconstruction</ce:text></ce:keyword></ce:keywords></head><tail><ce:bibliography><ce:section-title>References</ce:section-title><ce:bibliography-sec><ce:bib-reference id="bib1"><ce:label>Benoist, 1973</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="iso" xml:lang="fr"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Benoist</ce:surname><ce:given-name>M.</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Les causes mécaniques d'échec dans les reconstructions mandibulaires</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Rev. franç. Prothèse Maxillo-Faciale</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>2</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1973</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>31</sb:first-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib2"><ce:label>Cantor and Curtis, 1971</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="en"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Cantor</ce:surname><ce:given-name>R.</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>T.A.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Curtis</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Prosthetic management of edentulous mandibulectomy patients. I. Anatomic, physiologic, and psychologic considerations</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J. Prosth. Dent.</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>25</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1971</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>446</sb:first-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib3"><ce:label>Cantor and Curtis, 1971</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="en"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Cantor</ce:surname><ce:given-name>R.</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>T.A.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Curtis</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Prosthetic management of edentulous mandibulectomy patients. II. Clinical procedures</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J. Prosth. Dent.</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>25</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1971</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>546</sb:first-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib4"><ce:label>Cantor and Curtis, 1971</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="en"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Cantor</ce:surname><ce:given-name>R.</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>T.A.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Curtis</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Prosthetic management of edentulous mandibulectomy patients. III. Clinical evaluation</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J. Prosth. Dent.</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>25</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1971</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>670</sb:first-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib5"><ce:label>Cernea, et al, 1966</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="iso" xml:lang="fr"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Cernea</ce:surname><ce:given-name>P.</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>C.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Crepy</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>M.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Benoist</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>R.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Kuffer</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>F.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Guilbert</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Reconstitution mandibulaire après résection par greffe osseuse immédiate, sans blocage bimaxillaire</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Rev. Stomat.</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>67</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1966</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>672</sb:first-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib6"><ce:label>Conley, 1951</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="en"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Conley</ce:surname><ce:given-name>J.J.</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Use of vitallium prostheses and implants in reconstruction of the mandibular arch</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Plast. reconstr. Surg.</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>8</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1951</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>150</sb:first-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib7"><ce:label>Conley, 1953</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="en"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Conley</ce:surname><ce:given-name>J.J.</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Technique of immediate bone grafting in treatment of benign and malignant tumors of the mandible and a review of 17 consecutive cases</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Cancer</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>6</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1953</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>568</sb:first-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib8"><ce:label>Martin, 1889</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="iso" xml:lang="fr"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Martin</ce:surname><ce:given-name>Cl.</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>De la prothèse immédiate appliquée à la résection des maxillaires</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:book><sb:date>1889</sb:date><sb:publisher><sb:name>Masson</sb:name><sb:location>Stuttgart</sb:location></sb:publisher></sb:book></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib9"><ce:label>Millard, 1965</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="en"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Millard</ce:surname><ce:given-name>D.R.</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Immediate reconstruction of the lower jaw</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Plast. reconstr. Surg.</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>35</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1965</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>60</sb:first-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib10"><ce:label>Millard, et al, 1970</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="en"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Millard</ce:surname><ce:given-name>D.R.</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>W.P.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Garst</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>R.C.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Campbell</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>S.P.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Stockley</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Composite lower jaw reconstruction</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Plast. reconstr. Surg.</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>46</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1970</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>22</sb:first-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib11"><ce:label>Obwegeser, 1966</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="en"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Obwegeser</ce:surname><ce:given-name>H.L.</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Simultaneous resection and reconstruction of parts of the mandible via the intraoral route in patients with and without gross infection</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Oral Surg.</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>21</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1966</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>568</sb:first-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference></ce:bibliography-sec></ce:bibliography></tail></article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Experience with 220 cases of mandibular reconstruction</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA"><title>Experience with 220 cases of mandibular reconstruction</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Michel</namePart><namePart type="family">Benoist</namePart><affiliation>Clinic of Stomatology and Maxillo-Facial Surgery (Head: Prof. P. Cernéa, M.D.) University of Paris, France</affiliation><description>Michel Benoist, M.D., D.M.D. Service de Stomatologie et de Prothèse Maxillo-Faciale Groupe Hospitalier Pitie-Salpetrière 47, Boulevard de l'Hôpital F-75634 Paris Cedex 13</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1978</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1978</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><abstract lang="en">Summary: Extensive resections of the mandible are usually carried out for malignant tumours or non-malignant tumours with a tendency to reccur, such as ameloblastomas. These hemi-resections include the ascending and horizontal ramus of the mandible. Such mutilations have serious functional and aesthetic consequences. In order to avoid these drawbacks we use two sorts of implants. The first are made from metallic and plastic materials. They are used when patients are too weak to support a bone graft, when there is insufficient soft tissue coverage, or when a recurrence of the tumour is feared. In order to be well tolerated they must be made of materials which are fully accepted by the tissues. For the plastic part we use methyl-methacrylate and, for the metal part, “durallium”. The second type is used to maintain a bone graft in good position. It is completely metallic. The pattern is made in wax and reproduced in durallium. They are made and adjusted in the same way as plastic implants. The results are analysed separately covering two periods. In the first (1955–1967), the failures have been relatively large (25%). During the second period (1967–1974), a better choice of operative indications and a more precise technique gave better results (failure: 13%).</abstract><note>Paper read at the 3rd Congress of the E.A.M.F.S., London, September 1976.</note><subject lang="en"><genre>Key-Words</genre><topic>Mandibular defects</topic><topic>Implants</topic><topic>Bone graft</topic><topic>Mandibular reconstruction</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>JMSUR</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1978</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0301-0503</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0301-0503(78)X8057-X</identifier><part><date>1978</date><detail type="volume"><number>6</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="supplement"><number>C</number><caption>Suppl.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue-pages"><start>1</start><end>308</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>40</start><end>49</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">6182BC89C84148B0F56E88BE633983E69C4ACF80</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/6H6-HD2N96GN-M</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1016/S0301-0503(78)80067-8</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0301-0503(78)80067-8</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">78800678</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">©1978 Georg Thieme Publishers</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-HKKZVM7B-M">elsevier</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Georg Thieme Publishers, ©1978</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/6182BC89C84148B0F56E88BE633983E69C4ACF80/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003000 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003000 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:6182BC89C84148B0F56E88BE633983E69C4ACF80
|texte= Experience with 220 cases of mandibular reconstruction
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |