EdenteV2, Istex, Corpus, bibRecord, 002F80

Two Alternative Surgical Techniques for Enhancing Primary Implant Stability in the Posterior Maxilla: A Clinical Study Including Bone Density, Insertion Torque, and Resonance Frequency Analysis Data

Identifieur interne : 002F80 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002F79; suivant : 002F81

Two Alternative Surgical Techniques for Enhancing Primary Implant Stability in the Posterior Maxilla: A Clinical Study Including Bone Density, Insertion Torque, and Resonance Frequency Analysis Data

Auteurs : Ilser Turkyilmaz ; Utku Aksoy ; Edwin A. Mcglumphy

Source :

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2008-12.

RBID : ISTEX:613D448089EAC936847B7F77E9E58A81E50086F6

English descriptors

Abstract

Background: The primary stability of dental implants associated with resistance to micromotion during healing is affected by surgical technique and implant design, which are important especially in the soft bone, where implant failures are more likely.

Url:

https://api.istex.fr/document/613D448089EAC936847B7F77E9E58A81E50086F6/fulltext/pdf

DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00084.x

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:613D448089EAC936847B7F77E9E58A81E50086F6

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Two Alternative Surgical Techniques for Enhancing Primary Implant Stability in the Posterior Maxilla: A Clinical Study Including Bone Density, Insertion Torque, and Resonance Frequency Analysis Data</title>
<author><name sortKey="Turkyilmaz, Ilser" sort="Turkyilmaz, Ilser" uniqKey="Turkyilmaz I" first="Ilser" last="Turkyilmaz">Ilser Turkyilmaz</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Implant prosthodontic fellow, Department of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA;</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: turkyilmaz.1@osu.edu</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Aksoy, Utku" sort="Aksoy, Utku" uniqKey="Aksoy U" first="Utku" last="Aksoy">Utku Aksoy</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>research assistant, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey;</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mcglumphy, Edwin A" sort="Mcglumphy, Edwin A" uniqKey="Mcglumphy E" first="Edwin A." last="Mcglumphy">Edwin A. Mcglumphy</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>associate professor, Department of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:613D448089EAC936847B7F77E9E58A81E50086F6</idno>
<date when="2008" year="2008">2008</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00084.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/613D448089EAC936847B7F77E9E58A81E50086F6/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002F80</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002F80</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Two Alternative Surgical Techniques for Enhancing Primary Implant Stability in the Posterior Maxilla: A Clinical Study Including Bone Density, Insertion Torque, and Resonance Frequency Analysis Data</title>
<author><name sortKey="Turkyilmaz, Ilser" sort="Turkyilmaz, Ilser" uniqKey="Turkyilmaz I" first="Ilser" last="Turkyilmaz">Ilser Turkyilmaz</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Implant prosthodontic fellow, Department of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA;</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: turkyilmaz.1@osu.edu</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Aksoy, Utku" sort="Aksoy, Utku" uniqKey="Aksoy U" first="Utku" last="Aksoy">Utku Aksoy</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>research assistant, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey;</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mcglumphy, Edwin A" sort="Mcglumphy, Edwin A" uniqKey="Mcglumphy E" first="Edwin A." last="Mcglumphy">Edwin A. Mcglumphy</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>associate professor, Department of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">10</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="231">231</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="237">237</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2008-12">2008-12</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone density</term>
<term>Bone quality</term>
<term>Clin</term>
<term>Clin implant dent relat</term>
<term>Clinical implant dentistry</term>
<term>Clinical study</term>
<term>Control groups</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Implant sites</term>
<term>Implant stability</term>
<term>Implant stability quotient</term>
<term>Insertion</term>
<term>Insertion torque</term>
<term>Maxilla</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Maximum torque</term>
<term>More objective</term>
<term>Nobel biocare</term>
<term>Ohio state university</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Posterior maxilla</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Primary implant stability</term>
<term>Primary stability</term>
<term>Relat</term>
<term>Resonance frequency</term>
<term>Resonance frequency analysis</term>
<term>Resonance frequency measurements</term>
<term>Resonance frequency values</term>
<term>Sennerby</term>
<term>Soft bone</term>
<term>Strong correlations</term>
<term>Surgical</term>
<term>Surgical techniques</term>
<term>Test groups</term>
<term>Thinner drills</term>
<term>Tiunite</term>
<term>Tomography</term>
<term>Torque</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone density</term>
<term>Bone quality</term>
<term>Clin</term>
<term>Clin implant dent relat</term>
<term>Clinical implant dentistry</term>
<term>Clinical study</term>
<term>Control groups</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Implant sites</term>
<term>Implant stability</term>
<term>Implant stability quotient</term>
<term>Insertion</term>
<term>Insertion torque</term>
<term>Maxilla</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Maximum torque</term>
<term>More objective</term>
<term>Nobel biocare</term>
<term>Ohio state university</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Posterior maxilla</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Primary implant stability</term>
<term>Primary stability</term>
<term>Relat</term>
<term>Resonance frequency</term>
<term>Resonance frequency analysis</term>
<term>Resonance frequency measurements</term>
<term>Resonance frequency values</term>
<term>Sennerby</term>
<term>Soft bone</term>
<term>Strong correlations</term>
<term>Surgical</term>
<term>Surgical techniques</term>
<term>Test groups</term>
<term>Thinner drills</term>
<term>Tiunite</term>
<term>Tomography</term>
<term>Torque</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">Background: The primary stability of dental implants associated with resistance to micromotion during healing is affected by surgical technique and implant design, which are important especially in the soft bone, where implant failures are more likely.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName>
<keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string>
<json:string>bone density</json:string>
<json:string>maxilla</json:string>
<json:string>clin</json:string>
<json:string>insertion torque</json:string>
<json:string>insertion</json:string>
<json:string>implant placement</json:string>
<json:string>sennerby</json:string>
<json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string>
<json:string>implant stability</json:string>
<json:string>maxillofac</json:string>
<json:string>present study</json:string>
<json:string>tomography</json:string>
<json:string>tiunite</json:string>
<json:string>clin implant dent relat</json:string>
<json:string>relat</json:string>
<json:string>dental implants</json:string>
<json:string>primary stability</json:string>
<json:string>surgical</json:string>
<json:string>dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>posterior maxilla</json:string>
<json:string>primary implant stability</json:string>
<json:string>resonance frequency values</json:string>
<json:string>resonance frequency</json:string>
<json:string>bone quality</json:string>
<json:string>implant sites</json:string>
<json:string>clinical study</json:string>
<json:string>thinner drills</json:string>
<json:string>control groups</json:string>
<json:string>resonance frequency measurements</json:string>
<json:string>torque</json:string>
<json:string>surgical techniques</json:string>
<json:string>strong correlations</json:string>
<json:string>test groups</json:string>
<json:string>maximum torque</json:string>
<json:string>nobel biocare</json:string>
<json:string>soft bone</json:string>
<json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>more objective</json:string>
<json:string>resonance frequency analysis</json:string>
<json:string>implant stability quotient</json:string>
<json:string>ohio state university</json:string>
</teeft>
</keywords>
<author><json:item><name>Ilser Turkyilmaz DDS, PhD</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Implant prosthodontic fellow, Department of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA;</json:string>
<json:string>E-mail: turkyilmaz.1@osu.edu</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>Utku Aksoy DDS, PhD</name>
<affiliations><json:string>research assistant, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey;</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>Edwin A. McGlumphy DDS, MS</name>
<affiliations><json:string>associate professor, Department of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>bone density</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>computerized tomography</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>Hounsfield unit</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>implant</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>implant stability</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>insertion torque</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>resonance frequency analysis</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
<articleId><json:string>CID084</json:string>
</articleId>
<arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-NKD3BW3F-5</arkIstex>
<language><json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>Background: The primary stability of dental implants associated with resistance to micromotion during healing is affected by surgical technique and implant design, which are important especially in the soft bone, where implant failures are more likely.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators><score>5.617</score>
<pdfWordCount>3185</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>20443</pdfCharCount>
<pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount>
<pdfPageSize>585 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative>
<abstractWordCount>36</abstractWordCount>
<abstractCharCount>252</abstractCharCount>
<keywordCount>7</keywordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>Two Alternative Surgical Techniques for Enhancing Primary Implant Stability in the Posterior Maxilla: A Clinical Study Including Bone Density, Insertion Torque, and Resonance Frequency Analysis Data</title>
<pmid><json:string>18384409</json:string>
</pmid>
<genre><json:string>article</json:string>
</genre>
<host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title>
<language><json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string>
</doi>
<issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string>
</issn>
<eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string>
</eissn>
<publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string>
</publisherId>
<volume>10</volume>
<issue>4</issue>
<pages><first>231</first>
<last>237</last>
<total>7</total>
</pages>
<genre><json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
</host>
<namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2008</json:string>
</date>
<geogName></geogName>
<orgName><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey</json:string>
<json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string>
<json:string>The Ohio State University</json:string>
<json:string>Integration Diagnostics</json:string>
<json:string>Department of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</json:string>
<json:string>SPSS, Inc., Chicago</json:string>
</orgName>
<orgName_funder></orgName_funder>
<orgName_provider></orgName_provider>
<persName><json:string>Schwarz</json:string>
<json:string>Ilser Turkyilmaz</json:string>
<json:string>Sullivan</json:string>
<json:string>Friberg</json:string>
<json:string>Shapurian</json:string>
<json:string>Cunha</json:string>
</persName>
<placeName><json:string>Germany</json:string>
<json:string>Munich</json:string>
<json:string>Columbus</json:string>
<json:string>USA</json:string>
<json:string>Sweden</json:string>
<json:string>OH</json:string>
</placeName>
<ref_url></ref_url>
<ref_bibl></ref_bibl>
<bibl></bibl>
</unitex>
</namedEntities>
<ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-NKD3BW3F-5</json:string>
</ark>
<categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string>
<json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string>
</wos>
<scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string>
<json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string>
</scienceMetrix>
<scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string>
</scopus>
</categories>
<publicationDate>2008</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2008</copyrightDate>
<doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00084.x</json:string>
</doi>
<id>613D448089EAC936847B7F77E9E58A81E50086F6</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/613D448089EAC936847B7F77E9E58A81E50086F6/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item><extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/613D448089EAC936847B7F77E9E58A81E50086F6/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/613D448089EAC936847B7F77E9E58A81E50086F6/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Two Alternative Surgical Techniques for Enhancing Primary Implant Stability in the Posterior Maxilla: A Clinical Study Including Bone Density, Insertion Torque, and Resonance Frequency Analysis Data</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<availability><licence>© 2008, Copyright the Authors. Journal Compilation © 2008, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</licence>
</availability>
<date type="published" when="2008-12"></date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note>
<note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Two Alternative Surgical Techniques for Enhancing Primary Implant Stability in the Posterior Maxilla: A Clinical Study Including Bone Density, Insertion Torque, and Resonance Frequency Analysis Data</title>
<title level="a" type="short">Surgical Techniques for Enhancing Implant Stability in the Posterior Maxilla</title>
<author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Ilser</forename>
<surname>Turkyilmaz</surname>
<roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName>
</persName>
<affiliation>Implant prosthodontic fellow, Department of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA;<address><country key="US"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>Dr. Ilser Turkyilmaz, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, 305 West 12th Avenue, PO Box 182357, Columbus, OH, USA 43218‐2357; e‐mail: turkyilmaz.1@osu.edu</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Utku</forename>
<surname>Aksoy</surname>
<roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName>
</persName>
<affiliation>research assistant, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey;<address><country key="TR"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Edwin A.</forename>
<surname>McGlumphy</surname>
<roleName type="degree">DDS, MS</roleName>
</persName>
<affiliation>associate professor, Department of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA<address><country key="US"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<idno type="istex">613D448089EAC936847B7F77E9E58A81E50086F6</idno>
<idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-NKD3BW3F-5</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00084.x</idno>
<idno type="unit">CID084</idno>
<idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID084.pdf</idno>
</analytic>
<monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title>
<idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno>
<idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno>
<idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2008.10.issue-4</idno>
<idno type="product">CID</idno>
<idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">10</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="231">231</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="237">237</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2008-12"></date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head>
<p><hi rend="bold">Background:</hi>
 The primary stability of dental implants associated with resistance to micromotion during healing is affected by surgical technique and implant design, which are important especially in the soft bone, where implant failures are more likely.</p>
<p><hi rend="bold">Purposes:</hi>
 This study was designed to compare the parameters associated with implant insertion using two different methods of enhancing implant primary stability and to identify any relationship between these parameters at implant insertion.</p>
<p><hi rend="bold">Materials and Methods:</hi>
 A total of 60 implants were placed in the maxillary posterior regions of 22 patients. The bone densities at the implant sites were recorded using a computerized tomography machine in Hounsfield unit (HU). The maximum insertion torque data were recorded with the Osseocare™ (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) equipment, while resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements were taken using an Osstell™ (Integration Diagnostics AB, Göteborg, Sweden) machine at implant surgery. Comparisons including HU, Ncm, and implant stability quotient were made between two control groups (C1 and C2), and corresponding four test groups (T1–T4) using thinner drills to enhance primary implant stability.</p>
<p><hi rend="bold">Results:</hi>
 Two implants were lost, meaning an overall implant survival rate of 96.6% after 3 ± 1 years. When compared to control groups, significantly higher mean maximum insertion torque and RFA values were found for corresponding test groups. In addition, strong correlations were observed between the bone density and insertion torque, and implant stability values at implant placement.</p>
<p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion:</hi>
 The results of this study suggest that using thinner drills for implant placement in the maxillary posterior region where bone quality is poor may improve the primary implant stability, which helps clinicians to obtain higher implant survival rates.</p>
</abstract>
<textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">bone density</term>
<term xml:id="k2">computerized tomography</term>
<term xml:id="k3">Hounsfield unit</term>
<term xml:id="k4">implant</term>
<term xml:id="k5">implant stability</term>
<term xml:id="k6">insertion torque</term>
<term xml:id="k7">resonance frequency analysis</term>
</keywords>
<keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>ARTICLES</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en"></language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item><extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/613D448089EAC936847B7F77E9E58A81E50086F6/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName>
<publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc>
</publisherInfo>
<doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi>
<issn type="print">1523-0899</issn>
<issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn>
<idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id>
<id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id>
</idGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title>
</titleGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="part" position="12004"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.2008.10.issue-4</doi>
<numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="10">10</numbering>
<numbering type="journalIssue" number="4">4</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<coverDate startDate="2008-12">December 2008</coverDate>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="4" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00084.x</doi>
<idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID084"></id>
</idGroup>
<countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="7"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title>
</titleGroup>
<copyright>© 2008, Copyright the Authors. Journal Compilation © 2008, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright>
<eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2008-04-01"></event>
<event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2008-10-29"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-13"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event>
</eventGroup>
<numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="231">231</numbering>
<numbering type="pageLast" number="237">237</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<correspondenceTo>Dr. Ilser Turkyilmaz, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, 305 West 12th Avenue, PO Box 182357, Columbus, OH, USA 43218‐2357; e‐mail: <email>turkyilmaz.1@osu.edu</email>
</correspondenceTo>
<linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID084.pdf"></link>
</linkGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="4"></count>
<count type="tableTotal" number="2"></count>
<count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count>
<count type="referenceTotal" number="29"></count>
<count type="wordTotal" number="3832"></count>
<count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count>
<count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="main">Two Alternative Surgical Techniques for Enhancing Primary Implant Stability in the Posterior Maxilla: A Clinical Study Including Bone Density, Insertion Torque, and Resonance Frequency Analysis Data</title>
<title type="shortAuthors">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Volume 10, Number 4, 2008</title>
<title type="short">Surgical Techniques for Enhancing Implant Stability in the Posterior Maxilla</title>
</titleGroup>
<creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Ilser</givenNames>
<familyName>Turkyilmaz</familyName>
<degrees>DDS, PhD</degrees>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Utku</givenNames>
<familyName>Aksoy</familyName>
<degrees>DDS, PhD</degrees>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Edwin A.</givenNames>
<familyName>McGlumphy</familyName>
<degrees>DDS, MS</degrees>
</personName>
</creator>
</creators>
<affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Implant prosthodontic fellow, Department of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA;</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="TR"><unparsedAffiliation>research assistant, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey;</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>associate professor, Department of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
</affiliationGroup>
<keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">bone density</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k2">computerized tomography</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k3">Hounsfield unit</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k4">implant</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k5">implant stability</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k6">insertion torque</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k7">resonance frequency analysis</keyword>
</keywordGroup>
<abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title>
<p><b>Background:</b>
 The primary stability of dental implants associated with resistance to micromotion during healing is affected by surgical technique and implant design, which are important especially in the soft bone, where implant failures are more likely.</p>
<p><b>Purposes:</b>
 This study was designed to compare the parameters associated with implant insertion using two different methods of enhancing implant primary stability and to identify any relationship between these parameters at implant insertion.</p>
<p><b>Materials and Methods:</b>
 A total of 60 implants were placed in the maxillary posterior regions of 22 patients. The bone densities at the implant sites were recorded using a computerized tomography machine in Hounsfield unit (HU). The maximum insertion torque data were recorded with the Osseocare™ (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) equipment, while resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements were taken using an Osstell™ (Integration Diagnostics AB, Göteborg, Sweden) machine at implant surgery. Comparisons including HU, Ncm, and implant stability quotient were made between two control groups (C1 and C2), and corresponding four test groups (T1–T4) using thinner drills to enhance primary implant stability.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b>
 Two implants were lost, meaning an overall implant survival rate of 96.6% after 3 ± 1 years. When compared to control groups, significantly higher mean maximum insertion torque and RFA values were found for corresponding test groups. In addition, strong correlations were observed between the bone density and insertion torque, and implant stability values at implant placement.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b>
 The results of this study suggest that using thinner drills for implant placement in the maxillary posterior region where bone quality is poor may improve the primary implant stability, which helps clinicians to obtain higher implant survival rates.</p>
</abstract>
</abstractGroup>
</contentMeta>
</header>
</component>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Two Alternative Surgical Techniques for Enhancing Primary Implant Stability in the Posterior Maxilla: A Clinical Study Including Bone Density, Insertion Torque, and Resonance Frequency Analysis Data</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Surgical Techniques for Enhancing Implant Stability in the Posterior Maxilla</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Two Alternative Surgical Techniques for Enhancing Primary Implant Stability in the Posterior Maxilla: A Clinical Study Including Bone Density, Insertion Torque, and Resonance Frequency Analysis Data</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Ilser</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Turkyilmaz</namePart>
<namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart>
<affiliation>Implant prosthodontic fellow, Department of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA;</affiliation>
<affiliation>E-mail: turkyilmaz.1@osu.edu</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Utku</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Aksoy</namePart>
<namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart>
<affiliation>research assistant, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey;</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Edwin A.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">McGlumphy</namePart>
<namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MS</namePart>
<affiliation>associate professor, Department of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre>
<originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2008-12</dateIssued>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2008</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">4</extent>
<extent unit="tables">2</extent>
<extent unit="formulas">0</extent>
<extent unit="references">29</extent>
<extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent>
<extent unit="words">3832</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract>Background: The primary stability of dental implants associated with resistance to micromotion during healing is affected by surgical technique and implant design, which are important especially in the soft bone, where implant failures are more likely.</abstract>
<abstract>Purposes: This study was designed to compare the parameters associated with implant insertion using two different methods of enhancing implant primary stability and to identify any relationship between these parameters at implant insertion.</abstract>
<abstract>Materials and Methods: A total of 60 implants were placed in the maxillary posterior regions of 22 patients. The bone densities at the implant sites were recorded using a computerized tomography machine in Hounsfield unit (HU). The maximum insertion torque data were recorded with the Osseocare™ (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) equipment, while resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements were taken using an Osstell™ (Integration Diagnostics AB, Göteborg, Sweden) machine at implant surgery. Comparisons including HU, Ncm, and implant stability quotient were made between two control groups (C1 and C2), and corresponding four test groups (T1–T4) using thinner drills to enhance primary implant stability.</abstract>
<abstract>Results: Two implants were lost, meaning an overall implant survival rate of 96.6% after 3 ± 1 years. When compared to control groups, significantly higher mean maximum insertion torque and RFA values were found for corresponding test groups. In addition, strong correlations were observed between the bone density and insertion torque, and implant stability values at implant placement.</abstract>
<abstract>Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that using thinner drills for implant placement in the maxillary posterior region where bone quality is poor may improve the primary implant stability, which helps clinicians to obtain higher implant survival rates.</abstract>
<subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre>
<topic>bone density</topic>
<topic>computerized tomography</topic>
<topic>Hounsfield unit</topic>
<topic>implant</topic>
<topic>implant stability</topic>
<topic>insertion torque</topic>
<topic>resonance frequency analysis</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre>
<identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier>
<part><date>2008</date>
<detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption>
<number>10</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption>
<number>4</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages"><start>231</start>
<end>237</end>
<total>7</total>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">613D448089EAC936847B7F77E9E58A81E50086F6</identifier>
<identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-NKD3BW3F-5</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00084.x</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">CID084</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2008, Copyright the Authors. Journal Compilation © 2008, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</accessCondition>
<recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
<json:item><extension>json</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/json</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/613D448089EAC936847B7F77E9E58A81E50086F6/metadata/json</uri>
</json:item>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002F80 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002F80 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:613D448089EAC936847B7F77E9E58A81E50086F6
   |texte=   Two Alternative Surgical Techniques for Enhancing Primary Implant Stability in the Posterior Maxilla: A Clinical Study Including Bone Density, Insertion Torque, and Resonance Frequency Analysis Data
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Two Alternative Surgical Techniques for Enhancing Primary Implant Stability in the Posterior Maxilla: A Clinical Study Including Bone Density, Insertion Torque, and Resonance Frequency Analysis Data

Two Alternative Surgical Techniques for Enhancing Primary Implant Stability in the Posterior Maxilla: A Clinical Study Including Bone Density, Insertion Torque, and Resonance Frequency Analysis Data

Source :

English descriptors

Abstract

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri