Identification of the Edentulous Individual: An Investigation into the Accuracy of Radiographic Identifications
Identifieur interne : 002F27 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002F26; suivant : 002F28Identification of the Edentulous Individual: An Investigation into the Accuracy of Radiographic Identifications
Auteurs : Raymond Richmond ; Iain A. PrettySource :
- Journal of Forensic Sciences [ 0022-1198 ] ; 2010-07.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Antemortem, Antemortem radiograph, Antemortem radiographs, Correct responses, Current study, Dent clin, Dental identification, Dental identifications, Dental records, Denture, Dichotomous decision, Edentulous, Edentulous individuals, Expert group, Forensic, Forensic dentistry, Forensic dentists, Forensic odontologists, Forensic odontostomatol, High error rate, Human identification, Implant, Intraexaminer agreement, Intraoral radiographs, Kappa scores, Negative identifications, Novice, Novice group, Police officers, Positive identifications, Postmortem, Postmortem identification, Postmortem radiographs, Postmortem views, Radiograph, Radiographic sets, Receiver operator characteristics, Similar methodology, Such cases.
- Teeft :
- Antemortem, Antemortem radiograph, Antemortem radiographs, Correct responses, Current study, Dent clin, Dental identification, Dental identifications, Dental records, Denture, Dichotomous decision, Edentulous, Edentulous individuals, Expert group, Forensic, Forensic dentistry, Forensic dentists, Forensic odontologists, Forensic odontostomatol, High error rate, Human identification, Implant, Intraexaminer agreement, Intraoral radiographs, Kappa scores, Negative identifications, Novice, Novice group, Police officers, Positive identifications, Postmortem, Postmortem identification, Postmortem radiographs, Postmortem views, Radiograph, Radiographic sets, Receiver operator characteristics, Similar methodology, Such cases.
Abstract
Abstract: The dental identification of edentulous individuals can be challenging based on the lack of antemortem materials and unique features visible on radiographs. The constant resorption of the alveolar ridges further complicates the process. The purpose of this study was to quantify the error rate and reliability of dental identifications based on a comparison of synthesized antemortem and postmortem radiographs of edentulous individuals. Ten observers examined ten cases on two occasions and reported dichotomous and conclusion level decisions. These were analyzed using Kappa and Receiver Operator Characteristics. The mean area under the curve was 0.75 and the mean sensitivity was 0.57 and specificity was 0.83. These results suggest that dental identifications of edentulous individuals using radiographs alone have a high error rate and should be dual reported. These data add further weight to the argument that all dental prostheses should be labeled.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01401.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:6034C76A1E79CA643D3F2B9C7FFFA24944E540A3Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Identification of the Edentulous Individual: An Investigation into the Accuracy of Radiographic Identifications</title><author><name sortKey="Richmond, Raymond" sort="Richmond, Raymond" uniqKey="Richmond R" first="Raymond" last="Richmond">Raymond Richmond</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Graduate Student in Forensic Dentistry, The School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pretty, Iain A" sort="Pretty, Iain A" uniqKey="Pretty I" first="Iain A." last="Pretty">Iain A. Pretty</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Senior Lecturer in Restorative Dentistry, The School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:6034C76A1E79CA643D3F2B9C7FFFA24944E540A3</idno><date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01401.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/6034C76A1E79CA643D3F2B9C7FFFA24944E540A3/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002F27</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002F27</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Identification of the Edentulous Individual: An Investigation into the Accuracy of Radiographic Identifications<ref type="note" target="#fn1">*</ref></title><author><name sortKey="Richmond, Raymond" sort="Richmond, Raymond" uniqKey="Richmond R" first="Raymond" last="Richmond">Raymond Richmond</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Graduate Student in Forensic Dentistry, The School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pretty, Iain A" sort="Pretty, Iain A" uniqKey="Pretty I" first="Iain A." last="Pretty">Iain A. Pretty</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Senior Lecturer in Restorative Dentistry, The School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Forensic Sciences</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-1198</idno><idno type="eISSN">1556-4029</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">55</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="984">984</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="987">987</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">4</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-07">2010-07</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0022-1198</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-1198</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Antemortem</term><term>Antemortem radiograph</term><term>Antemortem radiographs</term><term>Correct responses</term><term>Current study</term><term>Dent clin</term><term>Dental identification</term><term>Dental identifications</term><term>Dental records</term><term>Denture</term><term>Dichotomous decision</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous individuals</term><term>Expert group</term><term>Forensic</term><term>Forensic dentistry</term><term>Forensic dentists</term><term>Forensic odontologists</term><term>Forensic odontostomatol</term><term>High error rate</term><term>Human identification</term><term>Implant</term><term>Intraexaminer agreement</term><term>Intraoral radiographs</term><term>Kappa scores</term><term>Negative identifications</term><term>Novice</term><term>Novice group</term><term>Police officers</term><term>Positive identifications</term><term>Postmortem</term><term>Postmortem identification</term><term>Postmortem radiographs</term><term>Postmortem views</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic sets</term><term>Receiver operator characteristics</term><term>Similar methodology</term><term>Such cases</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Antemortem</term><term>Antemortem radiograph</term><term>Antemortem radiographs</term><term>Correct responses</term><term>Current study</term><term>Dent clin</term><term>Dental identification</term><term>Dental identifications</term><term>Dental records</term><term>Denture</term><term>Dichotomous decision</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous individuals</term><term>Expert group</term><term>Forensic</term><term>Forensic dentistry</term><term>Forensic dentists</term><term>Forensic odontologists</term><term>Forensic odontostomatol</term><term>High error rate</term><term>Human identification</term><term>Implant</term><term>Intraexaminer agreement</term><term>Intraoral radiographs</term><term>Kappa scores</term><term>Negative identifications</term><term>Novice</term><term>Novice group</term><term>Police officers</term><term>Positive identifications</term><term>Postmortem</term><term>Postmortem identification</term><term>Postmortem radiographs</term><term>Postmortem views</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic sets</term><term>Receiver operator characteristics</term><term>Similar methodology</term><term>Such cases</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Abstract: The dental identification of edentulous individuals can be challenging based on the lack of antemortem materials and unique features visible on radiographs. The constant resorption of the alveolar ridges further complicates the process. The purpose of this study was to quantify the error rate and reliability of dental identifications based on a comparison of synthesized antemortem and postmortem radiographs of edentulous individuals. Ten observers examined ten cases on two occasions and reported dichotomous and conclusion level decisions. These were analyzed using Kappa and Receiver Operator Characteristics. The mean area under the curve was 0.75 and the mean sensitivity was 0.57 and specificity was 0.83. These results suggest that dental identifications of edentulous individuals using radiographs alone have a high error rate and should be dual reported. These data add further weight to the argument that all dental prostheses should be labeled.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>radiograph</json:string><json:string>postmortem</json:string><json:string>antemortem</json:string><json:string>edentulous individuals</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>postmortem radiographs</json:string><json:string>dental identification</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>novice</json:string><json:string>antemortem radiographs</json:string><json:string>dental identifications</json:string><json:string>forensic odontostomatol</json:string><json:string>negative identifications</json:string><json:string>dental records</json:string><json:string>dichotomous decision</json:string><json:string>intraexaminer agreement</json:string><json:string>novice group</json:string><json:string>kappa scores</json:string><json:string>expert group</json:string><json:string>intraoral radiographs</json:string><json:string>forensic dentists</json:string><json:string>antemortem radiograph</json:string><json:string>current study</json:string><json:string>postmortem views</json:string><json:string>postmortem identification</json:string><json:string>positive identifications</json:string><json:string>radiographic sets</json:string><json:string>receiver operator characteristics</json:string><json:string>high error rate</json:string><json:string>such cases</json:string><json:string>forensic dentistry</json:string><json:string>correct responses</json:string><json:string>human identification</json:string><json:string>dent clin</json:string><json:string>police officers</json:string><json:string>similar methodology</json:string><json:string>forensic odontologists</json:string><json:string>forensic</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Raymond Richmond B.Sc., M. Phil., Ph.D., D.C.P., F.H.E.A.</name><affiliations><json:string>Graduate Student in Forensic Dentistry, The School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Iain A. Pretty B.D.S. (Hons), M.Sc., Ph.D., M.F.D.S. R.C.S. (Ed.)</name><affiliations><json:string>Senior Lecturer in Restorative Dentistry, The School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>forensic science</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>radiography</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>denture marking</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>postmortem</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>identification</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JFO1401</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-WTD6K1K2-5</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: The dental identification of edentulous individuals can be challenging based on the lack of antemortem materials and unique features visible on radiographs. The constant resorption of the alveolar ridges further complicates the process. The purpose of this study was to quantify the error rate and reliability of dental identifications based on a comparison of synthesized antemortem and postmortem radiographs of edentulous individuals. Ten observers examined ten cases on two occasions and reported dichotomous and conclusion level decisions. These were analyzed using Kappa and Receiver Operator Characteristics. The mean area under the curve was 0.75 and the mean sensitivity was 0.57 and specificity was 0.83. These results suggest that dental identifications of edentulous individuals using radiographs alone have a high error rate and should be dual reported. These data add further weight to the argument that all dental prostheses should be labeled.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>142</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>969</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount><score>6.426</score><pdfWordCount>2722</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>18320</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>4</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>585.071 x 793.701 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>Identification of the Edentulous Individual: An Investigation into the Accuracy of Radiographic Identifications</title><pmid><json:string>20412366</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Forensic Sciences</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1556-4029</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0022-1198</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1556-4029</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JFO</json:string></publisherId><volume>55</volume><issue>4</issue><pages><first>984</first><last>987</last><total>4</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>PAPERODONTOLOGY</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2010</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>SPSS Inc., Chicago</json:string><json:string>National Institute for Health Research</json:string><json:string>University of Manchester</json:string><json:string>American Academy of Forensic Sciences RICHMOND AND PRETTY</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Iain</json:string><json:string>M.Sc</json:string><json:string>Expert</json:string><json:string>U.K. Received</json:string><json:string>An Investigation</json:string><json:string>Korkchi</json:string><json:string>Novice</json:string><json:string>Mean</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>RICHMOND</json:string><json:string>Specificity</json:string><json:string>America</json:string><json:string>Manchester</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Landis and Koch, 1977</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-WTD6K1K2-5</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - medicine, legal</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - legal & forensic medicine</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Life Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology</json:string><json:string>3 - Genetics</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - Pathology and Forensic Medicine</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2010</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2010</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01401.x</json:string></doi><id>6034C76A1E79CA643D3F2B9C7FFFA24944E540A3</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/6034C76A1E79CA643D3F2B9C7FFFA24944E540A3/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/6034C76A1E79CA643D3F2B9C7FFFA24944E540A3/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/6034C76A1E79CA643D3F2B9C7FFFA24944E540A3/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Identification of the Edentulous Individual: An Investigation into the Accuracy of Radiographic Identifications<ref type="note" target="#fn1">*</ref></title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2010 American Academy of Forensic Sciences</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2010-07"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Identification of the Edentulous Individual: An Investigation into the Accuracy of Radiographic Identifications<ref type="note" target="#fn1">*</ref></title><title level="a" type="short">IDENTIFICATION OF THE EDENTULOUS INDIVIDUAL</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Raymond</forename><surname>Richmond</surname><roleName type="degree">B.Sc., M. Phil., Ph.D., D.C.P., F.H.E.A.</roleName></persName><affiliation>Graduate Student in Forensic Dentistry, The School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Iain A.</forename><surname>Pretty</surname><roleName type="degree">B.D.S. (Hons), M.Sc., Ph.D., M.F.D.S. R.C.S. (Ed.)</roleName></persName><affiliation>Senior Lecturer in Restorative Dentistry, The School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">6034C76A1E79CA643D3F2B9C7FFFA24944E540A3</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-WTD6K1K2-5</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01401.x</idno><idno type="unit">JFO1401</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JFO.JFO1401.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Forensic Sciences</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES</title><idno type="pISSN">0022-1198</idno><idno type="eISSN">1556-4029</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1556-4029</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/jfo.2010.55.issue-4</idno><idno type="product">JFO</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">55</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="984">984</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="987">987</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">4</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-07"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold">Abstract: </hi> The dental identification of edentulous individuals can be challenging based on the lack of antemortem materials and unique features visible on radiographs. The constant resorption of the alveolar ridges further complicates the process. The purpose of this study was to quantify the error rate and reliability of dental identifications based on a comparison of synthesized antemortem and postmortem radiographs of edentulous individuals. Ten observers examined ten cases on two occasions and reported dichotomous and conclusion level decisions. These were analyzed using Kappa and Receiver Operator Characteristics. The mean area under the curve was 0.75 and the mean sensitivity was 0.57 and specificity was 0.83. These results suggest that dental identifications of edentulous individuals using radiographs alone have a high error rate and should be dual reported. These data add further weight to the argument that all dental prostheses should be labeled.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">forensic science</term><term xml:id="k2">radiography</term><term xml:id="k3">denture marking</term><term xml:id="k4">postmortem</term><term xml:id="k5">identification</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Papers</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>PAPER
ODONTOLOGY</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/6034C76A1E79CA643D3F2B9C7FFFA24944E540A3/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1556-4029</doi><issn type="print">0022-1198</issn><issn type="electronic">1556-4029</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JFO"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES">Journal of Forensic Sciences</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="07104"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jfo.2010.55.issue-4</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="55">55</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="4">4</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2010-07">July 2010</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="17" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01401.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JFO1401"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="4"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Papers</title><title type="articleCategory">PAPER
ODONTOLOGY</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2010 American Academy of Forensic Sciences</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-04-20"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2010-07-01"></event><event type="publishedOnlineAcceptedOrEarlyUnpaginated" date="2010-04-20"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.25 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-10-27"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-30"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-30"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="984">984</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="987">987</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Additional information and reprint requests:
Iain A. Pretty, B.D.S., M.Sc., Ph.D., M.F.D.S. R.C.S. (Ed.)
Dental Health Unit
3A Skelton House, Lloyd Street North
Manchester Science Park
Manchester M15 6SH
U.K.
E‐mail: <email>iain.pretty@manchester.ac.uk</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JFO.JFO1401.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Received 25 Mar. 2009; and in revised form 23 June 2009; accepted 29 June 2009.</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="5"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Identification of the Edentulous Individual: An Investigation into the Accuracy of Radiographic Identifications<link href="#fn1">*</link></title><title type="tocForm">Identification of the Edentulous Individual: An Investigation into the Accuracy of Radiographic Identifications</title><title type="shortAuthors">RICHMOND AND PRETTY</title><title type="short">IDENTIFICATION OF THE EDENTULOUS INDIVIDUAL</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Raymond</givenNames><familyName>Richmond</familyName><degrees>B.Sc., M. Phil., Ph.D., D.C.P., F.H.E.A.</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Iain A.</givenNames><familyName>Pretty</familyName><degrees>B.D.S. (Hons), M.Sc., Ph.D., M.F.D.S. R.C.S. (Ed.)</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Graduate Student in Forensic Dentistry, The School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2"><unparsedAffiliation>Senior Lecturer in Restorative Dentistry, The School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">forensic science</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">radiography</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">denture marking</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">postmortem</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">identification</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Abstract: </b> The dental identification of edentulous individuals can be challenging based on the lack of antemortem materials and unique features visible on radiographs. The constant resorption of the alveolar ridges further complicates the process. The purpose of this study was to quantify the error rate and reliability of dental identifications based on a comparison of synthesized antemortem and postmortem radiographs of edentulous individuals. Ten observers examined ten cases on two occasions and reported dichotomous and conclusion level decisions. These were analyzed using Kappa and Receiver Operator Characteristics. The mean area under the curve was 0.75 and the mean sensitivity was 0.57 and specificity was 0.83. These results suggest that dental identifications of edentulous individuals using radiographs alone have a high error rate and should be dual reported. These data add further weight to the argument that all dental prostheses should be labeled.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note xml:id="fn1"><p>
Dr. Iain Pretty is funded by a Clinician Scientist Award from the National Institute for Health Research, U.K.</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Identification of the Edentulous Individual: An Investigation into the Accuracy of Radiographic Identifications</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>IDENTIFICATION OF THE EDENTULOUS INDIVIDUAL</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Identification of the Edentulous Individual: An Investigation into the Accuracy of Radiographic Identifications*</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Raymond</namePart><namePart type="family">Richmond</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">B.Sc., M. Phil., Ph.D., D.C.P., F.H.E.A.</namePart><affiliation>Graduate Student in Forensic Dentistry, The School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Iain A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Pretty</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">B.D.S. (Hons), M.Sc., Ph.D., M.F.D.S. R.C.S. (Ed.)</namePart><affiliation>Senior Lecturer in Restorative Dentistry, The School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2010-07</dateIssued><edition>Received 25 Mar. 2009; and in revised form 23 June 2009; accepted 29 June 2009.</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">0</extent><extent unit="tables">5</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Abstract: The dental identification of edentulous individuals can be challenging based on the lack of antemortem materials and unique features visible on radiographs. The constant resorption of the alveolar ridges further complicates the process. The purpose of this study was to quantify the error rate and reliability of dental identifications based on a comparison of synthesized antemortem and postmortem radiographs of edentulous individuals. Ten observers examined ten cases on two occasions and reported dichotomous and conclusion level decisions. These were analyzed using Kappa and Receiver Operator Characteristics. The mean area under the curve was 0.75 and the mean sensitivity was 0.57 and specificity was 0.83. These results suggest that dental identifications of edentulous individuals using radiographs alone have a high error rate and should be dual reported. These data add further weight to the argument that all dental prostheses should be labeled.</abstract><note type="content">*Dr. Iain Pretty is funded by a Clinician Scientist Award from the National Institute for Health Research, U.K.</note><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>forensic science</topic><topic>radiography</topic><topic>denture marking</topic><topic>postmortem</topic><topic>identification</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Forensic Sciences</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>PAPERODONTOLOGY</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0022-1198</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1556-4029</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1556-4029</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JFO</identifier><part><date>2010</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>55</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>984</start><end>987</end><total>4</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">6034C76A1E79CA643D3F2B9C7FFFA24944E540A3</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-WTD6K1K2-5</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01401.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JFO1401</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2010 American Academy of Forensic Sciences</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/6034C76A1E79CA643D3F2B9C7FFFA24944E540A3/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002F27 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002F27 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:6034C76A1E79CA643D3F2B9C7FFFA24944E540A3
|texte= Identification of the Edentulous Individual: An Investigation into the Accuracy of Radiographic Identifications
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |