Oral function in patients wearing fixed prosthesis on osseointegrated implants in the maxilla: 3‐year follow‐up study
Identifieur interne : 002E83 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002E82; suivant : 002E84Oral function in patients wearing fixed prosthesis on osseointegrated implants in the maxilla: 3‐year follow‐up study
Auteurs : Sture Lundqvist ; Torgny HaraldsonSource :
- European Journal of Oral Sciences [ 0909-8836 ] ; 1992-10.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Acta, Acta odontol scand, Branemark, Canine region, Carlsson, Clenching, Clenching force, Clenching forces, Clinical examination, Community dentistry vaxjo, Complete dentures, Dent, Dentition, Denture, Different types, Dysfunction, Efficiency index, Gentle clenching, Haraldson, Helkimo, Implant, Implant bridges, Intercuspid position, Longitudinal studies, Lundqvist, Masticatory, Masticatory system, Maxillary, Maximal, Maximal clenching force, Natural dentition, Observation period, Occluding surfaces, Occlusal, Occlusal contacts, Occlusal perception, Oral function, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implant, Osseointegrated implant bridges, Osseointegrated implants, Periodontal receptors, Prosthesis, Prosthet dent, Scand, Significant correlation, Stomatognathic physiology, Swed dent, Test occasion, Threshold level, Threshold value.
- Teeft :
- Acta, Acta odontol scand, Branemark, Canine region, Carlsson, Clenching, Clenching force, Clenching forces, Clinical examination, Community dentistry vaxjo, Complete dentures, Dent, Dentition, Denture, Different types, Dysfunction, Efficiency index, Gentle clenching, Haraldson, Helkimo, Implant, Implant bridges, Intercuspid position, Longitudinal studies, Lundqvist, Masticatory, Masticatory system, Maxillary, Maximal, Maximal clenching force, Natural dentition, Observation period, Occluding surfaces, Occlusal, Occlusal contacts, Occlusal perception, Oral function, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implant, Osseointegrated implant bridges, Osseointegrated implants, Periodontal receptors, Prosthesis, Prosthet dent, Scand, Significant correlation, Stomatognathic physiology, Swed dent, Test occasion, Threshold level, Threshold value.
Abstract
Seventeen consecutive selected patients rehabilitated by means of a full maxillary bridge on osseointegrated implants ad modem Brånemark were evaluated over a 3‐yr period. Besides a subjective evaluation by means of a questionnaire an examination of the occlusal relationship, chewing force, chewing efficiency and interocclusal threshold level was performed before, immediately after, 3–6 months after, and finally 3 yr after bridge installation. All subjects were very pleased with the oral rehabilitation. The chewing force and the chewing efficiency development increased over time, while the threshold level for interocclusal detection remained unchanged. The clinical dysfunction index according to Helkimo indicated that there was no marked change in signs of dysfunction of the patients' masticatory systems during the observation period. From the present longitudinal investigation one can conclude that the replacement of a full maxillary denture with a fixed prosthesis on osseointegrated implants, facing a natural dentition or an osseointegrated implant supported bridge in the opposite jaw, leads to a progressive increase of chewing efficiency and chewing force, and a constant subjective improvement of jaw function, while no masticatory dysfunction seems to occur during the observation period.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1992.tb01071.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:5F7D31FF08B18AEF2BCD6A2E00398F93D57F0725Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Oral function in patients wearing fixed prosthesis on osseointegrated implants in the maxilla: 3‐year follow‐up study</title><author><name sortKey="Lundqvist, Sture" sort="Lundqvist, Sture" uniqKey="Lundqvist S" first="Sture" last="Lundqvist">Sture Lundqvist</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetics and Stomatognathic Physiology, Community Dentistry Växjö, Växjö</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, University of Göteborg</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>The Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Gothenburg</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence address: Sture Lundqvist, Department of Prosthetics and Stomatognathic Physiology, Community Dentistry Växjö, Klostergatan 16B, S‐352 31 Växjö, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Haraldson, Torgny" sort="Haraldson, Torgny" uniqKey="Haraldson T" first="Torgny" last="Haraldson">Torgny Haraldson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, University of Göteborg</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>The Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Gothenburg</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, Community Dentistry Borås, Borås, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:5F7D31FF08B18AEF2BCD6A2E00398F93D57F0725</idno><date when="1992" year="1992">1992</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0722.1992.tb01071.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/5F7D31FF08B18AEF2BCD6A2E00398F93D57F0725/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002E83</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002E83</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Oral function in patients wearing fixed prosthesis on osseointegrated implants in the maxilla: 3‐year follow‐up study</title><author><name sortKey="Lundqvist, Sture" sort="Lundqvist, Sture" uniqKey="Lundqvist S" first="Sture" last="Lundqvist">Sture Lundqvist</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetics and Stomatognathic Physiology, Community Dentistry Växjö, Växjö</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, University of Göteborg</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>The Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Gothenburg</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence address: Sture Lundqvist, Department of Prosthetics and Stomatognathic Physiology, Community Dentistry Växjö, Klostergatan 16B, S‐352 31 Växjö, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Haraldson, Torgny" sort="Haraldson, Torgny" uniqKey="Haraldson T" first="Torgny" last="Haraldson">Torgny Haraldson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, University of Göteborg</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>The Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Gothenburg</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, Community Dentistry Borås, Borås, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">European Journal of Oral Sciences</title><title level="j" type="alt">EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES</title><idno type="ISSN">0909-8836</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0722</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">100</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="279">279</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="283">283</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">5</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1992-10">1992-10</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0909-8836</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0909-8836</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acta</term><term>Acta odontol scand</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Canine region</term><term>Carlsson</term><term>Clenching</term><term>Clenching force</term><term>Clenching forces</term><term>Clinical examination</term><term>Community dentistry vaxjo</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dentition</term><term>Denture</term><term>Different types</term><term>Dysfunction</term><term>Efficiency index</term><term>Gentle clenching</term><term>Haraldson</term><term>Helkimo</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant bridges</term><term>Intercuspid position</term><term>Longitudinal studies</term><term>Lundqvist</term><term>Masticatory</term><term>Masticatory system</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maximal</term><term>Maximal clenching force</term><term>Natural dentition</term><term>Observation period</term><term>Occluding surfaces</term><term>Occlusal</term><term>Occlusal contacts</term><term>Occlusal perception</term><term>Oral function</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implant</term><term>Osseointegrated implant bridges</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Periodontal receptors</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Scand</term><term>Significant correlation</term><term>Stomatognathic physiology</term><term>Swed dent</term><term>Test occasion</term><term>Threshold level</term><term>Threshold value</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Acta</term><term>Acta odontol scand</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Canine region</term><term>Carlsson</term><term>Clenching</term><term>Clenching force</term><term>Clenching forces</term><term>Clinical examination</term><term>Community dentistry vaxjo</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dentition</term><term>Denture</term><term>Different types</term><term>Dysfunction</term><term>Efficiency index</term><term>Gentle clenching</term><term>Haraldson</term><term>Helkimo</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant bridges</term><term>Intercuspid position</term><term>Longitudinal studies</term><term>Lundqvist</term><term>Masticatory</term><term>Masticatory system</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maximal</term><term>Maximal clenching force</term><term>Natural dentition</term><term>Observation period</term><term>Occluding surfaces</term><term>Occlusal</term><term>Occlusal contacts</term><term>Occlusal perception</term><term>Oral function</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implant</term><term>Osseointegrated implant bridges</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Periodontal receptors</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Scand</term><term>Significant correlation</term><term>Stomatognathic physiology</term><term>Swed dent</term><term>Test occasion</term><term>Threshold level</term><term>Threshold value</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Seventeen consecutive selected patients rehabilitated by means of a full maxillary bridge on osseointegrated implants ad modem Brånemark were evaluated over a 3‐yr period. Besides a subjective evaluation by means of a questionnaire an examination of the occlusal relationship, chewing force, chewing efficiency and interocclusal threshold level was performed before, immediately after, 3–6 months after, and finally 3 yr after bridge installation. All subjects were very pleased with the oral rehabilitation. The chewing force and the chewing efficiency development increased over time, while the threshold level for interocclusal detection remained unchanged. The clinical dysfunction index according to Helkimo indicated that there was no marked change in signs of dysfunction of the patients' masticatory systems during the observation period. From the present longitudinal investigation one can conclude that the replacement of a full maxillary denture with a fixed prosthesis on osseointegrated implants, facing a natural dentition or an osseointegrated implant supported bridge in the opposite jaw, leads to a progressive increase of chewing efficiency and chewing force, and a constant subjective improvement of jaw function, while no masticatory dysfunction seems to occur during the observation period.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>clenching</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>occlusal</json:string><json:string>haraldson</json:string><json:string>masticatory</json:string><json:string>maximal clenching force</json:string><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>carlsson</json:string><json:string>clenching force</json:string><json:string>oral function</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>scand</json:string><json:string>helkimo</json:string><json:string>dysfunction</json:string><json:string>dentition</json:string><json:string>lundqvist</json:string><json:string>branemark</json:string><json:string>maxillary</json:string><json:string>acta</json:string><json:string>masticatory system</json:string><json:string>occluding surfaces</json:string><json:string>observation period</json:string><json:string>swed dent</json:string><json:string>acta odontol scand</json:string><json:string>significant correlation</json:string><json:string>test occasion</json:string><json:string>efficiency index</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implant bridges</json:string><json:string>stomatognathic physiology</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>maximal</json:string><json:string>clinical examination</json:string><json:string>gentle clenching</json:string><json:string>occlusal perception</json:string><json:string>longitudinal studies</json:string><json:string>canine region</json:string><json:string>periodontal receptors</json:string><json:string>threshold value</json:string><json:string>clenching forces</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implant</json:string><json:string>natural dentition</json:string><json:string>different types</json:string><json:string>threshold level</json:string><json:string>occlusal contacts</json:string><json:string>prosthet dent</json:string><json:string>intercuspid position</json:string><json:string>community dentistry vaxjo</json:string><json:string>implant bridges</json:string><json:string>complete dentures</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Sture Lundqvist</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetics and Stomatognathic Physiology, Community Dentistry Växjö, Växjö</json:string><json:string>Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, University of Göteborg</json:string><json:string>The Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Gothenburg</json:string><json:string>Correspondence address: Sture Lundqvist, Department of Prosthetics and Stomatognathic Physiology, Community Dentistry Växjö, Klostergatan 16B, S‐352 31 Växjö, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Torgny Haraldson</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, University of Göteborg</json:string><json:string>The Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Gothenburg</json:string><json:string>Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, Community Dentistry Borås, Borås, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bite force</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>jaws</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>mastication</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>occlusal perception</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>oral implants</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>EOS279</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-H5FRXZ43-X</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Seventeen consecutive selected patients rehabilitated by means of a full maxillary bridge on osseointegrated implants ad modem Brånemark were evaluated over a 3‐yr period. Besides a subjective evaluation by means of a questionnaire an examination of the occlusal relationship, chewing force, chewing efficiency and interocclusal threshold level was performed before, immediately after, 3–6 months after, and finally 3 yr after bridge installation. All subjects were very pleased with the oral rehabilitation. The chewing force and the chewing efficiency development increased over time, while the threshold level for interocclusal detection remained unchanged. The clinical dysfunction index according to Helkimo indicated that there was no marked change in signs of dysfunction of the patients' masticatory systems during the observation period. From the present longitudinal investigation one can conclude that the replacement of a full maxillary denture with a fixed prosthesis on osseointegrated implants, facing a natural dentition or an osseointegrated implant supported bridge in the opposite jaw, leads to a progressive increase of chewing efficiency and chewing force, and a constant subjective improvement of jaw function, while no masticatory dysfunction seems to occur during the observation period.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.974</score><pdfWordCount>2754</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>17582</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.6</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>6</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>542 x 760 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>185</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1311</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Oral function in patients wearing fixed prosthesis on osseointegrated implants in the maxilla: 3‐year follow‐up study</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>European Journal of Oral Sciences</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0722</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0909-8836</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0722</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>EOS</json:string></publisherId><volume>100</volume><issue>5</issue><pages><first>279</first><last>283</last><total>5</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1992</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Sweden Accepted</json:string><json:string>Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, Community Dentistry Boris, Boras, Sweden Lutidqvist S, Haraldson T</json:string><json:string>Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Gothenburg</json:string><json:string>Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, University</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthetics</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName></persName><placeName></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-H5FRXZ43-X</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string><json:string>4 - chirurgie (generalites). transplantations, greffes d'organes et de tissus. pathologie des greffons</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1992</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1992</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0722.1992.tb01071.x</json:string></doi><id>5F7D31FF08B18AEF2BCD6A2E00398F93D57F0725</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5F7D31FF08B18AEF2BCD6A2E00398F93D57F0725/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5F7D31FF08B18AEF2BCD6A2E00398F93D57F0725/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/5F7D31FF08B18AEF2BCD6A2E00398F93D57F0725/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Oral function in patients wearing fixed prosthesis on osseointegrated implants in the maxilla: 3‐year follow‐up study</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1992-10"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Oral function in patients wearing fixed prosthesis on osseointegrated implants in the maxilla: 3‐year follow‐up study</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Sture</forename><surname>Lundqvist</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetics and Stomatognathic Physiology, Community Dentistry Växjö, Växjö</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, University of Göteborg</affiliation><affiliation>The Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Gothenburg</affiliation><affiliation>Sture Lundqvist, Department of Prosthetics and Stomatognathic Physiology, Community Dentistry Växjö, Klostergatan 16B, S‐352 31 Växjö, Sweden</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Torgny</forename><surname>Haraldson</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, University of Göteborg</affiliation><affiliation>The Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Gothenburg</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, Community Dentistry Borås, Borås, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">5F7D31FF08B18AEF2BCD6A2E00398F93D57F0725</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-H5FRXZ43-X</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0722.1992.tb01071.x</idno><idno type="unit">EOS279</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:EOS.EOS279.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">European Journal of Oral Sciences</title><title level="j" type="alt">EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES</title><idno type="pISSN">0909-8836</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0722</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0722</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/eos.1992.100.issue-5</idno><idno type="product">EOS</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">100</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="279">279</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="283">283</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">5</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1992-10"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p>Seventeen consecutive selected patients rehabilitated by means of a full maxillary bridge on osseointegrated implants ad modem Brånemark were evaluated over a 3‐yr period. Besides a subjective evaluation by means of a questionnaire an examination of the occlusal relationship, chewing force, chewing efficiency and interocclusal threshold level was performed before, immediately after, 3–6 months after, and finally 3 yr after bridge installation. All subjects were very pleased with the oral rehabilitation. The chewing force and the chewing efficiency development increased over time, while the threshold level for interocclusal detection remained unchanged. The clinical dysfunction index according to Helkimo indicated that there was no marked change in signs of dysfunction of the patients' masticatory systems during the observation period. From the present longitudinal investigation one can conclude that the replacement of a full maxillary denture with a fixed prosthesis on osseointegrated implants, facing a natural dentition or an osseointegrated implant supported bridge in the opposite jaw, leads to a progressive increase of chewing efficiency and chewing force, and a constant subjective improvement of jaw function, while no masticatory dysfunction seems to occur during the observation period.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">bite force</term><term xml:id="k2">jaws</term><term xml:id="k3">mastication</term><term xml:id="k4">occlusal perception</term><term xml:id="k5">oral implants</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5F7D31FF08B18AEF2BCD6A2E00398F93D57F0725/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0722</doi><issn type="print">0909-8836</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0722</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="EOS"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES">European Journal of Oral Sciences</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="10005"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/eos.1992.100.issue-5</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="100">100</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="5">5</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="1992-10">October 1992</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0027900" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0722.1992.tb01071.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="EOS279"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="5"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2007-10-01"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-10-01"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-24"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="279">279</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="283">283</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Sture Lundqvist, Department of Prosthetics and Stomatognathic Physiology, Community Dentistry Växjö, Klostergatan 16B, S‐352 31 Växjö, Sweden</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:EOS.EOS279.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication 2 June 1991</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="28"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="7"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Oral function in patients wearing fixed prosthesis on osseointegrated implants in the maxilla: 3‐year follow‐up study</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1 #a2 #a3" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Sture</givenNames><familyName>Lundqvist</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2 #a3 #a4"><personName><givenNames>Torgny</givenNames><familyName>Haraldson</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Prosthetics and Stomatognathic Physiology, Community Dentistry Växjö, Växjö</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, University of Göteborg</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3"><unparsedAffiliation>The Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Gothenburg</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, Community Dentistry Borås, Borås, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">bite force</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">jaws</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">mastication</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">occlusal perception</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">oral implants</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>Seventeen consecutive selected patients rehabilitated by means of a full maxillary bridge on osseointegrated implants ad modem Brånemark were evaluated over a 3‐yr period. Besides a subjective evaluation by means of a questionnaire an examination of the occlusal relationship, chewing force, chewing efficiency and interocclusal threshold level was performed before, immediately after, 3–6 months after, and finally 3 yr after bridge installation. All subjects were very pleased with the oral rehabilitation. The chewing force and the chewing efficiency development increased over time, while the threshold level for interocclusal detection remained unchanged. The clinical dysfunction index according to Helkimo indicated that there was no marked change in signs of dysfunction of the patients' masticatory systems during the observation period. From the present longitudinal investigation one can conclude that the replacement of a full maxillary denture with a fixed prosthesis on osseointegrated implants, facing a natural dentition or an osseointegrated implant supported bridge in the opposite jaw, leads to a progressive increase of chewing efficiency and chewing force, and a constant subjective improvement of jaw function, while no masticatory dysfunction seems to occur during the observation period.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Oral function in patients wearing fixed prosthesis on osseointegrated implants in the maxilla: 3‐year follow‐up study</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Oral function in patients wearing fixed prosthesis on osseointegrated implants in the maxilla: 3‐year follow‐up study</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Sture</namePart><namePart type="family">Lundqvist</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetics and Stomatognathic Physiology, Community Dentistry Växjö, Växjö</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, University of Göteborg</affiliation><affiliation>The Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Gothenburg</affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence address: Sture Lundqvist, Department of Prosthetics and Stomatognathic Physiology, Community Dentistry Växjö, Klostergatan 16B, S‐352 31 Växjö, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Torgny</namePart><namePart type="family">Haraldson</namePart><affiliation>Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, University of Göteborg</affiliation><affiliation>The Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Gothenburg</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, Community Dentistry Borås, Borås, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1992-10</dateIssued><edition>Accepted for publication 2 June 1991</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1992</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="references">28</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">7</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Seventeen consecutive selected patients rehabilitated by means of a full maxillary bridge on osseointegrated implants ad modem Brånemark were evaluated over a 3‐yr period. Besides a subjective evaluation by means of a questionnaire an examination of the occlusal relationship, chewing force, chewing efficiency and interocclusal threshold level was performed before, immediately after, 3–6 months after, and finally 3 yr after bridge installation. All subjects were very pleased with the oral rehabilitation. The chewing force and the chewing efficiency development increased over time, while the threshold level for interocclusal detection remained unchanged. The clinical dysfunction index according to Helkimo indicated that there was no marked change in signs of dysfunction of the patients' masticatory systems during the observation period. From the present longitudinal investigation one can conclude that the replacement of a full maxillary denture with a fixed prosthesis on osseointegrated implants, facing a natural dentition or an osseointegrated implant supported bridge in the opposite jaw, leads to a progressive increase of chewing efficiency and chewing force, and a constant subjective improvement of jaw function, while no masticatory dysfunction seems to occur during the observation period.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>bite force</topic><topic>jaws</topic><topic>mastication</topic><topic>occlusal perception</topic><topic>oral implants</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>European Journal of Oral Sciences</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0909-8836</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0722</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0722</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">EOS</identifier><part><date>1992</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>100</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>5</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>279</start><end>283</end><total>5</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">5F7D31FF08B18AEF2BCD6A2E00398F93D57F0725</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-H5FRXZ43-X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0722.1992.tb01071.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">EOS279</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5F7D31FF08B18AEF2BCD6A2E00398F93D57F0725/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002E83 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002E83 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:5F7D31FF08B18AEF2BCD6A2E00398F93D57F0725
|texte= Oral function in patients wearing fixed prosthesis on osseointegrated implants in the maxilla: 3‐year follow‐up study
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |