A retrospective multicenter evaluation of the survival rate of osseointegrated fixtures supporting fixed partial prostheses in the treatment of partial edentulism
Identifieur interne : 002E30 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002E29; suivant : 002E31A retrospective multicenter evaluation of the survival rate of osseointegrated fixtures supporting fixed partial prostheses in the treatment of partial edentulism
Auteurs : D. Van SteenbergheSource :
- The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry [ 0022-3913 ] ; 1989.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Abutment stage, Albrektsson, Associate professor, Bone crest, Bone height, Bone loss, Bone remodelling, Branemark, Branemark henry, Branemark zarb, Catholic university leuven, Clinical evaluation, Dental branch, Dental implants, Dentistry, Distal sides, Edentulous, Edentulous jaws, Edentulous patients, Excerpta medica, Facial esthetics, Fibrous encapsulation, Final visit, Fistula formation, Fixture, Fixture loss, Fixture site, Fort washington, General motors corp, Healing time, Implant, Individual fixtures, Individual numbers, Insertion, King saud university, Marginal bone, Maxillofacial reconstruction, Maxillofacial surgery, Maximum distance, Multicenter, Natural teeth, Nearest half millimeter, Nobelpharma implant system, Observation period, Observation time, Ohio state university, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated fixtures, Osseointegrated implants, Osseointegrated titanium implants, Osseointegration, Partial denture, Partial dentures, Partial edentulism, Partial prostheses, Partial prosthesis, Partial reconstructions, Present study, Prosthesis, Prosthesis insertion, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Quintessence pub1, Radiolucent zone, Retrospective multicenter evaluation, Second patient, Steenberghe, Success rate, Tissue integration, Titanium, Titanium abutments.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Abutment stage, Albrektsson, Associate professor, Bone crest, Bone height, Bone loss, Bone remodelling, Branemark, Branemark henry, Branemark zarb, Catholic university leuven, Clinical evaluation, Dental branch, Dental implants, Dentistry, Distal sides, Edentulous, Edentulous jaws, Edentulous patients, Excerpta medica, Facial esthetics, Fibrous encapsulation, Final visit, Fistula formation, Fixture, Fixture loss, Fixture site, Fort washington, General motors corp, Healing time, Implant, Individual fixtures, Individual numbers, Insertion, King saud university, Marginal bone, Maxillofacial reconstruction, Maxillofacial surgery, Maximum distance, Multicenter, Natural teeth, Nearest half millimeter, Nobelpharma implant system, Observation period, Observation time, Ohio state university, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated fixtures, Osseointegrated implants, Osseointegrated titanium implants, Osseointegration, Partial denture, Partial dentures, Partial edentulism, Partial prostheses, Partial prosthesis, Partial reconstructions, Present study, Prosthesis, Prosthesis insertion, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Quintessence pub1, Radiolucent zone, Retrospective multicenter evaluation, Second patient, Steenberghe, Success rate, Tissue integration, Titanium, Titanium abutments.
Abstract
Abstract: Whether the excellent prognosis of the osseointegration technique also applies for the rehabilitation of partially edentulous jaws was investigated through a multicenter retrospective study. Six centers from three continents participated in the study, which included 133 fixtures in 38 patients. Forty fixtures were installed in the upper jaw and 93 in the lower jaw. The observation time varied between 6 and 36 months after prosthetic reconstruction. Clinical evaluation included mobility measurement of the restorations and control of infectious or neurologic complication. Radiologically the absence of radiolucency around the fixtures was checked by a single observer who also calculated the distance between the marginal bone and the top of the fixture. Fifty-eight percent of the prostheses were connected to natural teeth. The success rate for the individual fixtures in the upper and lower jaws was 87% and 92%, respectively. The most failures occurred before the prosthetic rehabilitation. The mean maximum distance between the margin of the bone and the fixture-abutment junction was 2.5 mm. Since only two of the 53 fixed prostheses were lost during the observation period, and since most fixture losses occurred before the prosthetic phase of the treatment, this study supports the concept that osseointegrated prostheses can also be applied to the rehabilitation of partial edentulism.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90378-8
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:5E51C66C872C4B24E1E8A5361DD021816E6A7044Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>A retrospective multicenter evaluation of the survival rate of osseointegrated fixtures supporting fixed partial prostheses in the treatment of partial edentulism</title><author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D." last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Catholic University Leuven, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:5E51C66C872C4B24E1E8A5361DD021816E6A7044</idno><date when="1989" year="1989">1989</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/0022-3913(89)90378-8</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/5E51C66C872C4B24E1E8A5361DD021816E6A7044/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002E30</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002E30</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">A retrospective multicenter evaluation of the survival rate of osseointegrated fixtures supporting fixed partial prostheses in the treatment of partial edentulism</title><author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D." last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Catholic University Leuven, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">YMPR</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1989">1989</date><biblScope unit="volume">61</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="217">217</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="223">223</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Abutment stage</term><term>Albrektsson</term><term>Associate professor</term><term>Bone crest</term><term>Bone height</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone remodelling</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Branemark henry</term><term>Branemark zarb</term><term>Catholic university leuven</term><term>Clinical evaluation</term><term>Dental branch</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Distal sides</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous jaws</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Excerpta medica</term><term>Facial esthetics</term><term>Fibrous encapsulation</term><term>Final visit</term><term>Fistula formation</term><term>Fixture</term><term>Fixture loss</term><term>Fixture site</term><term>Fort washington</term><term>General motors corp</term><term>Healing time</term><term>Implant</term><term>Individual fixtures</term><term>Individual numbers</term><term>Insertion</term><term>King saud university</term><term>Marginal bone</term><term>Maxillofacial reconstruction</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Maximum distance</term><term>Multicenter</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Nearest half millimeter</term><term>Nobelpharma implant system</term><term>Observation period</term><term>Observation time</term><term>Ohio state university</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated fixtures</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Osseointegrated titanium implants</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Partial denture</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Partial edentulism</term><term>Partial prostheses</term><term>Partial prosthesis</term><term>Partial reconstructions</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis insertion</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Quintessence pub1</term><term>Radiolucent zone</term><term>Retrospective multicenter evaluation</term><term>Second patient</term><term>Steenberghe</term><term>Success rate</term><term>Tissue integration</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium abutments</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Abutment stage</term><term>Albrektsson</term><term>Associate professor</term><term>Bone crest</term><term>Bone height</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone remodelling</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Branemark henry</term><term>Branemark zarb</term><term>Catholic university leuven</term><term>Clinical evaluation</term><term>Dental branch</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Distal sides</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous jaws</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Excerpta medica</term><term>Facial esthetics</term><term>Fibrous encapsulation</term><term>Final visit</term><term>Fistula formation</term><term>Fixture</term><term>Fixture loss</term><term>Fixture site</term><term>Fort washington</term><term>General motors corp</term><term>Healing time</term><term>Implant</term><term>Individual fixtures</term><term>Individual numbers</term><term>Insertion</term><term>King saud university</term><term>Marginal bone</term><term>Maxillofacial reconstruction</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Maximum distance</term><term>Multicenter</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Nearest half millimeter</term><term>Nobelpharma implant system</term><term>Observation period</term><term>Observation time</term><term>Ohio state university</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated fixtures</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Osseointegrated titanium implants</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Partial denture</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Partial edentulism</term><term>Partial prostheses</term><term>Partial prosthesis</term><term>Partial reconstructions</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis insertion</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Quintessence pub1</term><term>Radiolucent zone</term><term>Retrospective multicenter evaluation</term><term>Second patient</term><term>Steenberghe</term><term>Success rate</term><term>Tissue integration</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium abutments</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: Whether the excellent prognosis of the osseointegration technique also applies for the rehabilitation of partially edentulous jaws was investigated through a multicenter retrospective study. Six centers from three continents participated in the study, which included 133 fixtures in 38 patients. Forty fixtures were installed in the upper jaw and 93 in the lower jaw. The observation time varied between 6 and 36 months after prosthetic reconstruction. Clinical evaluation included mobility measurement of the restorations and control of infectious or neurologic complication. Radiologically the absence of radiolucency around the fixtures was checked by a single observer who also calculated the distance between the marginal bone and the top of the fixture. Fifty-eight percent of the prostheses were connected to natural teeth. The success rate for the individual fixtures in the upper and lower jaws was 87% and 92%, respectively. The most failures occurred before the prosthetic rehabilitation. The mean maximum distance between the margin of the bone and the fixture-abutment junction was 2.5 mm. Since only two of the 53 fixed prostheses were lost during the observation period, and since most fixture losses occurred before the prosthetic phase of the treatment, this study supports the concept that osseointegrated prostheses can also be applied to the rehabilitation of partial edentulism.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>fixture</json:string><json:string>branemark</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>steenberghe</json:string><json:string>osseointegration</json:string><json:string>albrektsson</json:string><json:string>natural teeth</json:string><json:string>bone crest</json:string><json:string>multicenter</json:string><json:string>partial prostheses</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>insertion</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated fixtures</json:string><json:string>partial prosthesis</json:string><json:string>individual fixtures</json:string><json:string>success rate</json:string><json:string>fixture loss</json:string><json:string>excerpta medica</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial reconstruction</json:string><json:string>prosthesis insertion</json:string><json:string>tissue integration</json:string><json:string>distal sides</json:string><json:string>branemark henry</json:string><json:string>partial edentulism</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>titanium abutments</json:string><json:string>fixture site</json:string><json:string>fort washington</json:string><json:string>partial reconstructions</json:string><json:string>quintessence pub1</json:string><json:string>abutment stage</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>nobelpharma implant system</json:string><json:string>branemark zarb</json:string><json:string>associate professor</json:string><json:string>partial dentures</json:string><json:string>partial denture</json:string><json:string>observation time</json:string><json:string>maximum distance</json:string><json:string>observation period</json:string><json:string>bone remodelling</json:string><json:string>catholic university leuven</json:string><json:string>healing time</json:string><json:string>second patient</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>abutment connection</json:string><json:string>fistula formation</json:string><json:string>final visit</json:string><json:string>edentulous jaws</json:string><json:string>facial esthetics</json:string><json:string>nearest half millimeter</json:string><json:string>radiolucent zone</json:string><json:string>ohio state university</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated titanium implants</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>marginal bone</json:string><json:string>retrospective multicenter evaluation</json:string><json:string>clinical evaluation</json:string><json:string>fibrous encapsulation</json:string><json:string>bone height</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial surgery</json:string><json:string>dental branch</json:string><json:string>king saud university</json:string><json:string>general motors corp</json:string><json:string>individual numbers</json:string><json:string>titanium</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>D. van Steenberghe M.D., Ph.D.</name><affiliations><json:string>Catholic University Leuven, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Maxillofacial prosthetics and dental implants</value></json:item></subject><arkIstex>ark:/67375/6H6-C3LRLD8N-6</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>Full-length article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: Whether the excellent prognosis of the osseointegration technique also applies for the rehabilitation of partially edentulous jaws was investigated through a multicenter retrospective study. Six centers from three continents participated in the study, which included 133 fixtures in 38 patients. Forty fixtures were installed in the upper jaw and 93 in the lower jaw. The observation time varied between 6 and 36 months after prosthetic reconstruction. Clinical evaluation included mobility measurement of the restorations and control of infectious or neurologic complication. Radiologically the absence of radiolucency around the fixtures was checked by a single observer who also calculated the distance between the marginal bone and the top of the fixture. Fifty-eight percent of the prostheses were connected to natural teeth. The success rate for the individual fixtures in the upper and lower jaws was 87% and 92%, respectively. The most failures occurred before the prosthetic rehabilitation. The mean maximum distance between the margin of the bone and the fixture-abutment junction was 2.5 mm. Since only two of the 53 fixed prostheses were lost during the observation period, and since most fixture losses occurred before the prosthetic phase of the treatment, this study supports the concept that osseointegrated prostheses can also be applied to the rehabilitation of partial edentulism.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.808</score><pdfWordCount>3300</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>25510</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>612 x 828 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>209</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1409</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>1</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>A retrospective multicenter evaluation of the survival rate of osseointegrated fixtures supporting fixed partial prostheses in the treatment of partial edentulism</title><pmid><json:string>2654366</json:string></pmid><pii><json:string>0022-3913(89)90378-8</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><title>The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><publicationDate>1989</publicationDate><issn><json:string>0022-3913</json:string></issn><pii><json:string>S0022-3913(00)X0119-9</json:string></pii><volume>61</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>217</first><last>223</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1080</json:string><json:string>1989</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Belgium Whether</json:string><json:string>Position Center No</json:string><json:string>Department THE JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC of Periodontology</json:string><json:string>Institute of Facial Esthetics, Fort Washington, Pa</json:string><json:string>Catholic University</json:string><json:string>University of Western Australia</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>J. Symington</json:string><json:string>M. De Clercq</json:string><json:string>P. Krogh</json:string><json:string>I. Number</json:string><json:string>E.A. Adler</json:string><json:string>T. Taylor</json:string><json:string>R. Schulman</json:string><json:string>J. Gustianis</json:string><json:string>Ken Orth</json:string><json:string>F. Disque</json:string><json:string>S. Fredd</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>D.C.</json:string><json:string>Washington</json:string><json:string>Seattle</json:string><json:string>Toronto</json:string><json:string>Leuven</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Lundgren et al.</json:string><json:string>Ericsson et al</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/6H6-C3LRLD8N-6</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1989</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1989</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1016/0022-3913(89)90378-8</json:string></doi><id>5E51C66C872C4B24E1E8A5361DD021816E6A7044</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5E51C66C872C4B24E1E8A5361DD021816E6A7044/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5E51C66C872C4B24E1E8A5361DD021816E6A7044/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/5E51C66C872C4B24E1E8A5361DD021816E6A7044/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">A retrospective multicenter evaluation of the survival rate of osseointegrated fixtures supporting fixed partial prostheses in the treatment of partial edentulism</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>ELSEVIER</p></availability><date>1989</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">A retrospective multicenter evaluation of the survival rate of osseointegrated fixtures supporting fixed partial prostheses in the treatment of partial edentulism</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">D.</forename><surname>van Steenberghe</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">M.D., Ph.D.</roleName><note type="biography">Reprint requests to: Prof. D. van Steenberghe Catholic University Leuven Faculty of Medicine Department of Periodontology Capucijnenvoer 7 B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.</note><note type="biography">Professor and Head, Department of Periodontology.</note><affiliation>Reprint requests to: Prof. D. van Steenberghe Catholic University Leuven Faculty of Medicine Department of Periodontology Capucijnenvoer 7 B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.</affiliation><affiliation>Professor and Head, Department of Periodontology.</affiliation><affiliation>Catholic University Leuven, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">5E51C66C872C4B24E1E8A5361DD021816E6A7044</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/0022-3913(89)90378-8</idno><idno type="PII">0022-3913(89)90378-8</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j">The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">YMPR</title><idno type="pISSN">0022-3913</idno><idno type="PII">S0022-3913(00)X0119-9</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1989"></date><biblScope unit="volume">61</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="217">217</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="223">223</biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1989</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Whether the excellent prognosis of the osseointegration technique also applies for the rehabilitation of partially edentulous jaws was investigated through a multicenter retrospective study. Six centers from three continents participated in the study, which included 133 fixtures in 38 patients. Forty fixtures were installed in the upper jaw and 93 in the lower jaw. The observation time varied between 6 and 36 months after prosthetic reconstruction. Clinical evaluation included mobility measurement of the restorations and control of infectious or neurologic complication. Radiologically the absence of radiolucency around the fixtures was checked by a single observer who also calculated the distance between the marginal bone and the top of the fixture. Fifty-eight percent of the prostheses were connected to natural teeth. The success rate for the individual fixtures in the upper and lower jaws was 87% and 92%, respectively. The most failures occurred before the prosthetic rehabilitation. The mean maximum distance between the margin of the bone and the fixture-abutment junction was 2.5 mm. Since only two of the 53 fixed prostheses were lost during the observation period, and since most fixture losses occurred before the prosthetic phase of the treatment, this study supports the concept that osseointegrated prostheses can also be applied to the rehabilitation of partial edentulism.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>article-category</head><item><term>Maxillofacial prosthetics and dental implants</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1989">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5E51C66C872C4B24E1E8A5361DD021816E6A7044/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier, elements deleted: tail"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 4.5.2//EN//XML" URI="art452.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><converted-article version="4.5.2" docsubtype="fla"><item-info><jid>YMPR</jid><aid>89903788</aid><ce:pii>0022-3913(89)90378-8</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1016/0022-3913(89)90378-8</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="unknown" year="1989"></ce:copyright><ce:doctopics><ce:doctopic><ce:text>Maxillofacial prosthetics and dental implants</ce:text></ce:doctopic></ce:doctopics></item-info><head><ce:title>A retrospective multicenter evaluation of the survival rate of osseointegrated fixtures supporting fixed partial prostheses in the treatment of partial edentulism</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>D.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>van Steenberghe</ce:surname><ce:degrees>M.D., Ph.D.</ce:degrees><ce:cross-ref refid="COR1"><ce:sup>∗</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="FN1"><ce:sup>∗</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:affiliation><ce:textfn>Catholic University Leuven, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven, Belgium</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:correspondence id="COR1"><ce:label>∗</ce:label><ce:text><ce:italic>Reprint requests to:</ce:italic> <ce:small-caps>Prof. D. van Steenberghe Catholic University Leuven Faculty of Medicine Department of Periodontology Capucijnenvoer</ce:small-caps> 7 B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.</ce:text></ce:correspondence><ce:footnote id="FN1"><ce:label>∗</ce:label><ce:note-para>Professor and Head, Department of Periodontology.</ce:note-para></ce:footnote></ce:author-group><ce:abstract><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para>Whether the excellent prognosis of the osseointegration technique also applies for the rehabilitation of partially edentulous jaws was investigated through a multicenter retrospective study. Six centers from three continents participated in the study, which included 133 fixtures in 38 patients. Forty fixtures were installed in the upper jaw and 93 in the lower jaw. The observation time varied between 6 and 36 months after prosthetic reconstruction. Clinical evaluation included mobility measurement of the restorations and control of infectious or neurologic complication. Radiologically the absence of radiolucency around the fixtures was checked by a single observer who also calculated the distance between the marginal bone and the top of the fixture. Fifty-eight percent of the prostheses were connected to natural teeth. The success rate for the individual fixtures in the upper and lower jaws was 87% and 92%, respectively. The most failures occurred before the prosthetic rehabilitation. The mean maximum distance between the margin of the bone and the fixture-abutment junction was 2.5 mm. Since only two of the 53 fixed prostheses were lost during the observation period, and since most fixture losses occurred before the prosthetic phase of the treatment, this study supports the concept that osseointegrated prostheses can also be applied to the rehabilitation of partial edentulism.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract></head></converted-article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>A retrospective multicenter evaluation of the survival rate of osseointegrated fixtures supporting fixed partial prostheses in the treatment of partial edentulism</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>A retrospective multicenter evaluation of the survival rate of osseointegrated fixtures supporting fixed partial prostheses in the treatment of partial edentulism</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">D.</namePart><namePart type="family">van Steenberghe</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">M.D., Ph.D.</namePart><affiliation>Catholic University Leuven, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><description>Reprint requests to: Prof. D. van Steenberghe Catholic University Leuven Faculty of Medicine Department of Periodontology Capucijnenvoer 7 B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.</description><description>Professor and Head, Department of Periodontology.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1989</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1989</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><abstract lang="en">Abstract: Whether the excellent prognosis of the osseointegration technique also applies for the rehabilitation of partially edentulous jaws was investigated through a multicenter retrospective study. Six centers from three continents participated in the study, which included 133 fixtures in 38 patients. Forty fixtures were installed in the upper jaw and 93 in the lower jaw. The observation time varied between 6 and 36 months after prosthetic reconstruction. Clinical evaluation included mobility measurement of the restorations and control of infectious or neurologic complication. Radiologically the absence of radiolucency around the fixtures was checked by a single observer who also calculated the distance between the marginal bone and the top of the fixture. Fifty-eight percent of the prostheses were connected to natural teeth. The success rate for the individual fixtures in the upper and lower jaws was 87% and 92%, respectively. The most failures occurred before the prosthetic rehabilitation. The mean maximum distance between the margin of the bone and the fixture-abutment junction was 2.5 mm. Since only two of the 53 fixed prostheses were lost during the observation period, and since most fixture losses occurred before the prosthetic phase of the treatment, this study supports the concept that osseointegrated prostheses can also be applied to the rehabilitation of partial edentulism.</abstract><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Maxillofacial prosthetics and dental implants</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>YMPR</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">198902</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0022-3913</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0022-3913(00)X0119-9</identifier><part><date>198902</date><detail type="volume"><number>61</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>2</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue-pages"><start>A29</start><end>A32</end></extent><extent unit="issue-pages"><start>A5</start><end>A26</end></extent><extent unit="issue-pages"><start>127</start><end>262</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>217</start><end>223</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">5E51C66C872C4B24E1E8A5361DD021816E6A7044</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/6H6-C3LRLD8N-6</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1016/0022-3913(89)90378-8</identifier><identifier type="PII">0022-3913(89)90378-8</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-HKKZVM7B-M">elsevier</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5E51C66C872C4B24E1E8A5361DD021816E6A7044/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002E30 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002E30 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:5E51C66C872C4B24E1E8A5361DD021816E6A7044
|texte= A retrospective multicenter evaluation of the survival rate of osseointegrated fixtures supporting fixed partial prostheses in the treatment of partial edentulism
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |