Patient satisfaction with mini‐implant stabilised full dentures. A 1‐year prospective study
Identifieur interne : 002E04 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002E03; suivant : 002E05Patient satisfaction with mini‐implant stabilised full dentures. A 1‐year prospective study
Auteurs : C. Tomasi ; B. Idmyr ; J. L. WennströmSource :
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2013-07.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Baseline, Clin, Clinical evaluation, Complete denture, Complete dentures, Conventional overdenture treatment, Current study, Dent, Dentatus atlas, Denture, Denture move, Dichotomous variables, Edentulous, Edentulous patient, Edentulous patients, Elderly patients, Failure ratio, Food particles, Full denture, Full dentures, Implant, Implant failure, Implant failure rate, Implant failures, Implant length, Implant placement, Implant treatment, John wiley sons, Long implants, Mand, Mand mand, Mand mand mand, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular overdenture, Mandibular overdentures, Maxilla, Maxillary dentures, Maxillofac, Mcnemar test, Median, Median scores, Mini implants, Narrow diameter implants, Oral function, Oral implantol, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral rehabil, Oral rehabilitation, Overall discomfort, Overall satisfaction, Overdenture, Overdenture treatment, Overdentures, Patient satisfaction, Plaque score, Poor stability, Positive outcomes, Present study, Prospective cohort, Prospective study, Radiographic evaluation, Resilient liner, Retentive elements, Retrospective study, Sahlgrenska academy, Screening examination, Short implants, Social life, Total treatment time, Treatment approach, Treatment time, Visual analogue scales.
- Teeft :
- Baseline, Clin, Clinical evaluation, Complete denture, Complete dentures, Conventional overdenture treatment, Current study, Dent, Dentatus atlas, Denture, Denture move, Dichotomous variables, Edentulous, Edentulous patient, Edentulous patients, Elderly patients, Failure ratio, Food particles, Full denture, Full dentures, Implant, Implant failure, Implant failure rate, Implant failures, Implant length, Implant placement, Implant treatment, John wiley sons, Long implants, Mand, Mand mand, Mand mand mand, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular overdenture, Mandibular overdentures, Maxilla, Maxillary dentures, Maxillofac, Mcnemar test, Median, Median scores, Mini implants, Narrow diameter implants, Oral function, Oral implantol, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral rehabil, Oral rehabilitation, Overall discomfort, Overall satisfaction, Overdenture, Overdenture treatment, Overdentures, Patient satisfaction, Plaque score, Poor stability, Positive outcomes, Present study, Prospective cohort, Prospective study, Radiographic evaluation, Resilient liner, Retentive elements, Retrospective study, Sahlgrenska academy, Screening examination, Short implants, Social life, Total treatment time, Treatment approach, Treatment time, Visual analogue scales.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient‐centred outcomes with regard to function and comfort after placement of mini‐implants for stabilisation of complete dentures. The trial was designed as a prospective cohort of 12‐months duration and involved 21 subjects in the age of 50–90 years having a full denture in the maxilla or the mandible with poor stability during function. Flapless installation of 2–4 narrow‐body Dentatus Atlas® implants was performed and retention for the existing denture was obtained by the use of a silicone‐based soft lining material (Tuf‐Link®). Patients' judgement of perceived satisfaction with function and comfort of the dentures was recorded at baseline, 1‐ and 12‐months post‐treatment using 10‐centimetre visual analogue scales (VAS) and a questionnaire. Clinical examination of the conditions of the peri‐implant soft tissues was performed at 12 months. Nineteen of the 21 patients were available for the 12‐month follow‐up examination. The two drop‐out subjects lost all implants within 1 month and rejected retreatment. Further six subjects lost 1–2 implants, but were sucessfully retreated by insertion of new implants. Overall satisfaction, chewing and speaking comfort were all markedly improved from pre‐treatment median VAS scores of around 4–5 to median scores of 9·0–10 (10 = optimal) at the final examination. The prevalence of positive answers to questions regarding stability/function of the denture increased significantly to almost 100% for all questions. Treatment involving maxillary dentures and the use of short implants (7–10 mm) was associated with an increased risk of implant failure. The results indicate that placement of mini‐implants as retentive elements for full dentures with poor functional stability has a marked positive impact on the patients' perception of oral function and comfort as well as security in social life.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/joor.12053
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:5DD8FC9A83C896A9CFB95672D7A8E8DA7183F2E8Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Patient satisfaction with mini‐implant stabilised full dentures. A 1‐year prospective study</title><author><name sortKey="Tomasi, C" sort="Tomasi, C" uniqKey="Tomasi C" first="C." last="Tomasi">C. Tomasi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence: Cristiano Tomasi, Department of Periodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Box 450, SE 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden.E‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: cristiano.tomasi@odontologi.gu.se</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Idmyr, B" sort="Idmyr, B" uniqKey="Idmyr B" first="B." last="Idmyr">B. Idmyr</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private practice, Mjölby, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wennstrom, J L" sort="Wennstrom, J L" uniqKey="Wennstrom J" first="J. L." last="Wennström">J. L. Wennström</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:5DD8FC9A83C896A9CFB95672D7A8E8DA7183F2E8</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/joor.12053</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/5DD8FC9A83C896A9CFB95672D7A8E8DA7183F2E8/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002E04</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002E04</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Patient satisfaction with mini‐implant stabilised full dentures. A 1‐year prospective study</title><author><name sortKey="Tomasi, C" sort="Tomasi, C" uniqKey="Tomasi C" first="C." last="Tomasi">C. Tomasi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence: Cristiano Tomasi, Department of Periodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Box 450, SE 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden.E‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: cristiano.tomasi@odontologi.gu.se</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Idmyr, B" sort="Idmyr, B" uniqKey="Idmyr B" first="B." last="Idmyr">B. Idmyr</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private practice, Mjölby, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wennstrom, J L" sort="Wennstrom, J L" uniqKey="Wennstrom J" first="J. L." last="Wennström">J. L. Wennström</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">40</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="526">526</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="534">534</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><date type="published" when="2013-07">2013-07</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Baseline</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical evaluation</term><term>Complete denture</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Conventional overdenture treatment</term><term>Current study</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dentatus atlas</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture move</term><term>Dichotomous variables</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patient</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Elderly patients</term><term>Failure ratio</term><term>Food particles</term><term>Full denture</term><term>Full dentures</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant failure rate</term><term>Implant failures</term><term>Implant length</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Long implants</term><term>Mand</term><term>Mand mand</term><term>Mand mand mand</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular overdenture</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary dentures</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Mcnemar test</term><term>Median</term><term>Median scores</term><term>Mini implants</term><term>Narrow diameter implants</term><term>Oral function</term><term>Oral implantol</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral rehabil</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Overall discomfort</term><term>Overall satisfaction</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdenture treatment</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Plaque score</term><term>Poor stability</term><term>Positive outcomes</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prospective cohort</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Radiographic evaluation</term><term>Resilient liner</term><term>Retentive elements</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Sahlgrenska academy</term><term>Screening examination</term><term>Short implants</term><term>Social life</term><term>Total treatment time</term><term>Treatment approach</term><term>Treatment time</term><term>Visual analogue scales</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Baseline</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical evaluation</term><term>Complete denture</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Conventional overdenture treatment</term><term>Current study</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dentatus atlas</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture move</term><term>Dichotomous variables</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patient</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Elderly patients</term><term>Failure ratio</term><term>Food particles</term><term>Full denture</term><term>Full dentures</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant failure rate</term><term>Implant failures</term><term>Implant length</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Long implants</term><term>Mand</term><term>Mand mand</term><term>Mand mand mand</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular overdenture</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary dentures</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Mcnemar test</term><term>Median</term><term>Median scores</term><term>Mini implants</term><term>Narrow diameter implants</term><term>Oral function</term><term>Oral implantol</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral rehabil</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Overall discomfort</term><term>Overall satisfaction</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdenture treatment</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Plaque score</term><term>Poor stability</term><term>Positive outcomes</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prospective cohort</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Radiographic evaluation</term><term>Resilient liner</term><term>Retentive elements</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Sahlgrenska academy</term><term>Screening examination</term><term>Short implants</term><term>Social life</term><term>Total treatment time</term><term>Treatment approach</term><term>Treatment time</term><term>Visual analogue scales</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient‐centred outcomes with regard to function and comfort after placement of mini‐implants for stabilisation of complete dentures. The trial was designed as a prospective cohort of 12‐months duration and involved 21 subjects in the age of 50–90 years having a full denture in the maxilla or the mandible with poor stability during function. Flapless installation of 2–4 narrow‐body Dentatus Atlas® implants was performed and retention for the existing denture was obtained by the use of a silicone‐based soft lining material (Tuf‐Link®). Patients' judgement of perceived satisfaction with function and comfort of the dentures was recorded at baseline, 1‐ and 12‐months post‐treatment using 10‐centimetre visual analogue scales (VAS) and a questionnaire. Clinical examination of the conditions of the peri‐implant soft tissues was performed at 12 months. Nineteen of the 21 patients were available for the 12‐month follow‐up examination. The two drop‐out subjects lost all implants within 1 month and rejected retreatment. Further six subjects lost 1–2 implants, but were sucessfully retreated by insertion of new implants. Overall satisfaction, chewing and speaking comfort were all markedly improved from pre‐treatment median VAS scores of around 4–5 to median scores of 9·0–10 (10 = optimal) at the final examination. The prevalence of positive answers to questions regarding stability/function of the denture increased significantly to almost 100% for all questions. Treatment involving maxillary dentures and the use of short implants (7–10 mm) was associated with an increased risk of implant failure. The results indicate that placement of mini‐implants as retentive elements for full dentures with poor functional stability has a marked positive impact on the patients' perception of oral function and comfort as well as security in social life.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>mand</json:string><json:string>overdentures</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>overdenture</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>maxillofac</json:string><json:string>overall satisfaction</json:string><json:string>full denture</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>poor stability</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>median</json:string><json:string>social life</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>denture move</json:string><json:string>complete dentures</json:string><json:string>elderly patients</json:string><json:string>patient satisfaction</json:string><json:string>implant length</json:string><json:string>full dentures</json:string><json:string>baseline</json:string><json:string>mand mand mand</json:string><json:string>clinical evaluation</json:string><json:string>treatment time</json:string><json:string>treatment approach</json:string><json:string>oral rehabil</json:string><json:string>prospective cohort</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>retentive elements</json:string><json:string>narrow diameter implants</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>screening examination</json:string><json:string>overall discomfort</json:string><json:string>dichotomous variables</json:string><json:string>mcnemar test</json:string><json:string>short implants</json:string><json:string>implant failure</json:string><json:string>food particles</json:string><json:string>plaque score</json:string><json:string>complete denture</json:string><json:string>dentatus atlas</json:string><json:string>oral function</json:string><json:string>mand mand</json:string><json:string>positive outcomes</json:string><json:string>overdenture treatment</json:string><json:string>implant failure rate</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>oral rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>failure ratio</json:string><json:string>sahlgrenska academy</json:string><json:string>conventional overdenture treatment</json:string><json:string>implant failures</json:string><json:string>current study</json:string><json:string>long implants</json:string><json:string>visual analogue scales</json:string><json:string>median scores</json:string><json:string>total treatment time</json:string><json:string>implant treatment</json:string><json:string>mandibular overdentures</json:string><json:string>edentulous patient</json:string><json:string>retrospective study</json:string><json:string>oral implantol</json:string><json:string>maxillary dentures</json:string><json:string>radiographic evaluation</json:string><json:string>mini implants</json:string><json:string>mandibular overdenture</json:string><json:string>resilient liner</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>C. Tomasi</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</json:string><json:string>Correspondence: Cristiano Tomasi, Department of Periodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Box 450, SE 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden.E‐mail:</json:string><json:string>E-mail: cristiano.tomasi@odontologi.gu.se</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>B.‐O. Idmyr</name><affiliations><json:string>Private practice, Mjölby, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>J. L. Wennström</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>case series</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dentures</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>mini‐implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>prospective</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JOOR12053</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-VVXPX8KM-5</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient‐centred outcomes with regard to function and comfort after placement of mini‐implants for stabilisation of complete dentures. The trial was designed as a prospective cohort of 12‐months duration and involved 21 subjects in the age of 50–90 years having a full denture in the maxilla or the mandible with poor stability during function. Flapless installation of 2–4 narrow‐body Dentatus Atlas® implants was performed and retention for the existing denture was obtained by the use of a silicone‐based soft lining material (Tuf‐Link®). Patients' judgement of perceived satisfaction with function and comfort of the dentures was recorded at baseline, 1‐ and 12‐months post‐treatment using 10‐centimetre visual analogue scales (VAS) and a questionnaire. Clinical examination of the conditions of the peri‐implant soft tissues was performed at 12 months. Nineteen of the 21 patients were available for the 12‐month follow‐up examination. The two drop‐out subjects lost all implants within 1 month and rejected retreatment. Further six subjects lost 1–2 implants, but were sucessfully retreated by insertion of new implants. Overall satisfaction, chewing and speaking comfort were all markedly improved from pre‐treatment median VAS scores of around 4–5 to median scores of 9·0–10 (10 = optimal) at the final examination. The prevalence of positive answers to questions regarding stability/function of the denture increased significantly to almost 100% for all questions. Treatment involving maxillary dentures and the use of short implants (7–10 mm) was associated with an increased risk of implant failure. The results indicate that placement of mini‐implants as retentive elements for full dentures with poor functional stability has a marked positive impact on the patients' perception of oral function and comfort as well as security in social life.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>9.32</score><pdfWordCount>4320</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>28108</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.7</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>277</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1897</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Patient satisfaction with mini‐implant stabilised full dentures. A 1‐year prospective study</title><pmid><json:string>23551029</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0305-182X</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1365-2842</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JOOR</json:string></publisherId><volume>40</volume><issue>7</issue><pages><first>526</first><last>534</last><total>9</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Original Article</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2013-03-21</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>University of Gothenburg</json:string><json:string>Sons Ltd</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Elsyad</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Max Max</json:string><json:string>Dr Ester</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Helsinki</json:string><json:string>Stockholm</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-VVXPX8KM-5</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2013</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2013</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/joor.12053</json:string></doi><id>5DD8FC9A83C896A9CFB95672D7A8E8DA7183F2E8</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5DD8FC9A83C896A9CFB95672D7A8E8DA7183F2E8/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5DD8FC9A83C896A9CFB95672D7A8E8DA7183F2E8/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/5DD8FC9A83C896A9CFB95672D7A8E8DA7183F2E8/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Patient satisfaction with mini‐implant stabilised full dentures. A 1‐year prospective study</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Wiley Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><licence>© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2013-07"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Patient satisfaction with mini‐implant stabilised full dentures. A 1‐year prospective study</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">C.</forename><surname>Tomasi</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Periodontology</orgName><orgName>Institute of Odontology</orgName><orgName>The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Gothenburg</settlement><country key="SE">Sweden</country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence: Cristiano Tomasi, Department of Periodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Box 450, SE 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden. E‐mail: cristiano.tomasi@odontologi.gu.se</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">B.‐O.</forename><surname>Idmyr</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Private practice</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Mjölby</settlement><country key="SE">Sweden</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">J. L.</forename><surname>Wennström</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Periodontology</orgName><orgName>Institute of Odontology</orgName><orgName>The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Gothenburg</settlement><country key="SE">Sweden</country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">5DD8FC9A83C896A9CFB95672D7A8E8DA7183F2E8</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-VVXPX8KM-5</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/joor.12053</idno><idno type="unit">JOOR12053</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JOOR.JOOR12053.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="pISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/joor.2013.40.issue-7</idno><idno type="product">JOOR</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">40</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="526">526</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="534">534</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><date type="published" when="2013-07"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract style="main" xml:id="joor12053-abs-0001"><head>Summary</head><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient‐centred outcomes with regard to function and comfort after placement of mini‐implants for stabilisation of complete dentures. The trial was designed as a prospective cohort of 12‐months duration and involved 21 subjects in the age of 50–90 years having a full denture in the maxilla or the mandible with poor stability during function. Flapless installation of 2–4 narrow‐body <hi rend="fc">D</hi>entatus Atlas<hi rend="superscript">®</hi> implants was performed and retention for the existing denture was obtained by the use of a silicone‐based soft lining material (Tuf‐Link<hi rend="superscript">®</hi>). Patients' judgement of perceived satisfaction with function and comfort of the dentures was recorded at baseline, 1‐ and 12‐months post‐treatment using 10‐centimetre visual analogue scales (<hi rend="fc">VAS</hi>) and a questionnaire. Clinical examination of the conditions of the peri‐implant soft tissues was performed at 12 months. Nineteen of the 21 patients were available for the 12‐month follow‐up examination. The two drop‐out subjects lost all implants within 1 month and rejected retreatment. Further six subjects lost 1–2 implants, but were sucessfully retreated by insertion of new implants. Overall satisfaction, chewing and speaking comfort were all markedly improved from pre‐treatment median <hi rend="fc">VAS</hi> scores of around 4–5 to median scores of 9·0–10 (10 = optimal) at the final examination. The prevalence of positive answers to questions regarding stability/function of the denture increased significantly to almost 100% for all questions. Treatment involving maxillary dentures and the use of short implants (7–10 mm) was associated with an increased risk of implant failure. The results indicate that placement of mini‐implants as retentive elements for full dentures with poor functional stability has a marked positive impact on the patients' perception of oral function and comfort as well as security in social life.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords><term xml:id="joor12053-kwd-0001">case series</term><term xml:id="joor12053-kwd-0002">dental implants</term><term xml:id="joor12053-kwd-0003">dentures</term><term xml:id="joor12053-kwd-0004">mini‐implants</term><term xml:id="joor12053-kwd-0005">prospective</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Original Article</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5DD8FC9A83C896A9CFB95672D7A8E8DA7183F2E8/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:id="joor12053" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</doi><issn type="print">0305-182X</issn><issn type="electronic">1365-2842</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JOOR"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title sort="JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title type="short">J Oral Rehabil</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="07107"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/joor.2013.40.issue-7</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="40">40</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">7</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2013-07">July 2013</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="70" status="forIssue" type="article"><doi>10.1111/joor.12053</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JOOR12053"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count number="9" type="pageTotal"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Original Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</copyright><eventGroup><event date="2013-03-14" type="manuscriptAccepted"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2013-03-21" type="xmlCreated"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2013-03-30"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2013-03-30"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2013-06-10"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-20"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-03"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">526</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">534</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><lineatedText><line>Correspondence: Cristiano Tomasi, Department of Periodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Box 450, SE 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden.</line><line>E‐mail: <email>cristiano.tomasi@odontologi.gu.se</email></line></lineatedText></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JOOR.JOOR12053.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">Patient satisfaction with mini‐implant stabilised full dentures. A 1‐year prospective study</title><title type="shortAuthors">C. Tomasi <i>et al</i>.</title></titleGroup><creators><creator affiliationRef="#joor12053-aff-0001" corresponding="yes" creatorRole="author" xml:id="joor12053-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>C.</givenNames> <familyName>Tomasi</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#joor12053-aff-0002" creatorRole="author" xml:id="joor12053-cr-0002"><personName><givenNames>B.‐O.</givenNames> <familyName>Idmyr</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#joor12053-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="joor12053-cr-0003"><personName><givenNames>J. L.</givenNames> <familyName>Wennström</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation countryCode="SE" type="organization" xml:id="joor12053-aff-0001"><orgDiv>Department of Periodontology</orgDiv> <orgName>Institute of Odontology</orgName> <orgName>The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg</orgName> <address><city>Gothenburg</city><country>Sweden</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="SE" type="organization" xml:id="joor12053-aff-0002"><orgName>Private practice</orgName> <address><city>Mjölby</city> <country>Sweden</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="joor12053-kwd-0001">case series</keyword><keyword xml:id="joor12053-kwd-0002">dental implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="joor12053-kwd-0003">dentures</keyword><keyword xml:id="joor12053-kwd-0004">mini‐implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="joor12053-kwd-0005">prospective</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:id="joor12053-abs-0001"><title type="main">Summary</title><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient‐centred outcomes with regard to function and comfort after placement of mini‐implants for stabilisation of complete dentures. The trial was designed as a prospective cohort of 12‐months duration and involved 21 subjects in the age of 50–90 years having a full denture in the maxilla or the mandible with poor stability during function. Flapless installation of 2–4 narrow‐body <fc>D</fc>entatus Atlas<sup>®</sup> implants was performed and retention for the existing denture was obtained by the use of a silicone‐based soft lining material (Tuf‐Link<sup>®</sup>). Patients' judgement of perceived satisfaction with function and comfort of the dentures was recorded at baseline, 1‐ and 12‐months post‐treatment using 10‐centimetre visual analogue scales (<fc>VAS</fc>) and a questionnaire. Clinical examination of the conditions of the peri‐implant soft tissues was performed at 12 months. Nineteen of the 21 patients were available for the 12‐month follow‐up examination. The two drop‐out subjects lost all implants within 1 month and rejected retreatment. Further six subjects lost 1–2 implants, but were sucessfully retreated by insertion of new implants. Overall satisfaction, chewing and speaking comfort were all markedly improved from pre‐treatment median <fc>VAS</fc> scores of around 4–5 to median scores of 9·0–10 (10 = optimal) at the final examination. The prevalence of positive answers to questions regarding stability/function of the denture increased significantly to almost 100% for all questions. Treatment involving maxillary dentures and the use of short implants (7–10 mm) was associated with an increased risk of implant failure. The results indicate that placement of mini‐implants as retentive elements for full dentures with poor functional stability has a marked positive impact on the patients' perception of oral function and comfort as well as security in social life.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Patient satisfaction with mini‐implant stabilised full dentures. A 1‐year prospective study</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Patient satisfaction with mini‐implant stabilised full dentures. A 1‐year prospective study</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">C.</namePart><namePart type="family">Tomasi</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence: Cristiano Tomasi, Department of Periodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Box 450, SE 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden.E‐mail:</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: cristiano.tomasi@odontologi.gu.se</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">B.‐O.</namePart><namePart type="family">Idmyr</namePart><affiliation>Private practice, Mjölby, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">J. L.</namePart><namePart type="family">Wennström</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2013-07</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2013-03-21</dateCreated><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2013-03-14</dateValid><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2013</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract>The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient‐centred outcomes with regard to function and comfort after placement of mini‐implants for stabilisation of complete dentures. The trial was designed as a prospective cohort of 12‐months duration and involved 21 subjects in the age of 50–90 years having a full denture in the maxilla or the mandible with poor stability during function. Flapless installation of 2–4 narrow‐body Dentatus Atlas® implants was performed and retention for the existing denture was obtained by the use of a silicone‐based soft lining material (Tuf‐Link®). Patients' judgement of perceived satisfaction with function and comfort of the dentures was recorded at baseline, 1‐ and 12‐months post‐treatment using 10‐centimetre visual analogue scales (VAS) and a questionnaire. Clinical examination of the conditions of the peri‐implant soft tissues was performed at 12 months. Nineteen of the 21 patients were available for the 12‐month follow‐up examination. The two drop‐out subjects lost all implants within 1 month and rejected retreatment. Further six subjects lost 1–2 implants, but were sucessfully retreated by insertion of new implants. Overall satisfaction, chewing and speaking comfort were all markedly improved from pre‐treatment median VAS scores of around 4–5 to median scores of 9·0–10 (10 = optimal) at the final examination. The prevalence of positive answers to questions regarding stability/function of the denture increased significantly to almost 100% for all questions. Treatment involving maxillary dentures and the use of short implants (7–10 mm) was associated with an increased risk of implant failure. The results indicate that placement of mini‐implants as retentive elements for full dentures with poor functional stability has a marked positive impact on the patients' perception of oral function and comfort as well as security in social life.</abstract><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>case series</topic><topic>dental implants</topic><topic>dentures</topic><topic>mini‐implants</topic><topic>prospective</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>J Oral Rehabil</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Original Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0305-182X</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JOOR</identifier><part><date>2013</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>40</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>7</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>526</start><end>534</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">5DD8FC9A83C896A9CFB95672D7A8E8DA7183F2E8</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-VVXPX8KM-5</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/joor.12053</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JOOR12053</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5DD8FC9A83C896A9CFB95672D7A8E8DA7183F2E8/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002E04 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002E04 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:5DD8FC9A83C896A9CFB95672D7A8E8DA7183F2E8
|texte= Patient satisfaction with mini‐implant stabilised full dentures. A 1‐year prospective study
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |