Soft Tissue Augmentation in Connection to Dental Implant Treatment Using a Synthetic, Porous Material – A Case Series with a 6‐Month Follow‐Up
Identifieur interne : 002D17 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002D16; suivant : 002D18Soft Tissue Augmentation in Connection to Dental Implant Treatment Using a Synthetic, Porous Material – A Case Series with a 6‐Month Follow‐Up
Auteurs : Bertil Friberg ; Torsten JemtSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2012-12.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Aesthetic zone, Alveolar bone, Antibiotic regime, Artelon, Augmentation, Augmentation material, Bacterial contamination, Bertil friberg, Blue line, Bone grafts, Buccal, Buccal concavity, Buccal contour, Case report, Case series, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical photographs, Clinical registrations, Clinical trial, Complete coverage, Computer measurements, Computerized technique, Connective tissue grafts, Cubic millimeter, Dent, Dental implant treatment, Dental implants, Entire cylinder, Exclusion criteria, Extraction sockets, Graft, Green line, Health service, High porosity, Implant, Implant placement, Individual patients, Keratinized, Keratinized mucosa, Keratinized tissue, Keratinized tissue height, Maxilla, Maxillary front region, Months postoperatively, Months tissue volume, Obvious increase, Open pore structure, Oral implant treatment, Oral maxillofac implants, Periodontics, Porous material, Postoperative, Postoperative problems, Postoperative study, Pretreatment, Reference model, Root coverage, Sagittal, Sagittal plane, Sagittal planes, Soft tissue augmentation, Soft tissue volume, Soft tissues, Squared pattern, Sterile saline solution, Study cast, Study period, Subjective evaluation, Surgical, Surgical procedure, Tissue augmentation, Tissue shrinkage, Tissue volume, Total tissue volume, Treatment discomfort.
- Teeft :
- Aesthetic zone, Alveolar bone, Antibiotic regime, Artelon, Augmentation, Augmentation material, Bacterial contamination, Bertil friberg, Blue line, Bone grafts, Buccal, Buccal concavity, Buccal contour, Case report, Case series, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical photographs, Clinical registrations, Clinical trial, Complete coverage, Computer measurements, Computerized technique, Connective tissue grafts, Cubic millimeter, Dent, Dental implant treatment, Dental implants, Entire cylinder, Exclusion criteria, Extraction sockets, Graft, Green line, Health service, High porosity, Implant, Implant placement, Individual patients, Keratinized, Keratinized mucosa, Keratinized tissue, Keratinized tissue height, Maxilla, Maxillary front region, Months postoperatively, Months tissue volume, Obvious increase, Open pore structure, Oral implant treatment, Oral maxillofac implants, Periodontics, Porous material, Postoperative, Postoperative problems, Postoperative study, Pretreatment, Reference model, Root coverage, Sagittal, Sagittal plane, Sagittal planes, Soft tissue augmentation, Soft tissue volume, Soft tissues, Squared pattern, Sterile saline solution, Study cast, Study period, Subjective evaluation, Surgical, Surgical procedure, Tissue augmentation, Tissue shrinkage, Tissue volume, Total tissue volume, Treatment discomfort.
Abstract
Background: Bony defects/concavities in the aesthetic zone of maxillae may interfere with the results of prosthetic procedures by producing shading superior to the crown. Such regions can be augmented either by bone or soft tissue autografts, allografts, or xenografts. Tissue shrinkage is thus anticipated, and a method to objectively measure the tissue change is valuable.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00320.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:5BE40E2144C945A8B635A7DA2D6B479E27029912Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Soft Tissue Augmentation in Connection to Dental Implant Treatment Using a Synthetic, Porous Material – A Case Series with a 6‐Month Follow‐Up</title><author><name sortKey="Friberg, Bertil" sort="Friberg, Bertil" uniqKey="Friberg B" first="Bertil" last="Friberg">Bertil Friberg</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Associated professor, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: bertil.friberg@vgregion.se</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jemt, Torsten" sort="Jemt, Torsten" uniqKey="Jemt T" first="Torsten" last="Jemt">Torsten Jemt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>professor, Department Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, Sahlgrenska Akademin, University of Göteborg, Göteborg, Sweden and The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:5BE40E2144C945A8B635A7DA2D6B479E27029912</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00320.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/5BE40E2144C945A8B635A7DA2D6B479E27029912/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002D17</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002D17</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Soft Tissue Augmentation in Connection to Dental Implant Treatment Using a Synthetic, Porous Material – A Case Series with a 6‐Month Follow‐Up</title><author><name sortKey="Friberg, Bertil" sort="Friberg, Bertil" uniqKey="Friberg B" first="Bertil" last="Friberg">Bertil Friberg</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Associated professor, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: bertil.friberg@vgregion.se</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jemt, Torsten" sort="Jemt, Torsten" uniqKey="Jemt T" first="Torsten" last="Jemt">Torsten Jemt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>professor, Department Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, Sahlgrenska Akademin, University of Göteborg, Göteborg, Sweden and The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="872">872</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="881">881</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-12">2012-12</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aesthetic zone</term><term>Alveolar bone</term><term>Antibiotic regime</term><term>Artelon</term><term>Augmentation</term><term>Augmentation material</term><term>Bacterial contamination</term><term>Bertil friberg</term><term>Blue line</term><term>Bone grafts</term><term>Buccal</term><term>Buccal concavity</term><term>Buccal contour</term><term>Case report</term><term>Case series</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical photographs</term><term>Clinical registrations</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Complete coverage</term><term>Computer measurements</term><term>Computerized technique</term><term>Connective tissue grafts</term><term>Cubic millimeter</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental implant treatment</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Entire cylinder</term><term>Exclusion criteria</term><term>Extraction sockets</term><term>Graft</term><term>Green line</term><term>Health service</term><term>High porosity</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Individual patients</term><term>Keratinized</term><term>Keratinized mucosa</term><term>Keratinized tissue</term><term>Keratinized tissue height</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary front region</term><term>Months postoperatively</term><term>Months tissue volume</term><term>Obvious increase</term><term>Open pore structure</term><term>Oral implant treatment</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Periodontics</term><term>Porous material</term><term>Postoperative</term><term>Postoperative problems</term><term>Postoperative study</term><term>Pretreatment</term><term>Reference model</term><term>Root coverage</term><term>Sagittal</term><term>Sagittal plane</term><term>Sagittal planes</term><term>Soft tissue augmentation</term><term>Soft tissue volume</term><term>Soft tissues</term><term>Squared pattern</term><term>Sterile saline solution</term><term>Study cast</term><term>Study period</term><term>Subjective evaluation</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical procedure</term><term>Tissue augmentation</term><term>Tissue shrinkage</term><term>Tissue volume</term><term>Total tissue volume</term><term>Treatment discomfort</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Aesthetic zone</term><term>Alveolar bone</term><term>Antibiotic regime</term><term>Artelon</term><term>Augmentation</term><term>Augmentation material</term><term>Bacterial contamination</term><term>Bertil friberg</term><term>Blue line</term><term>Bone grafts</term><term>Buccal</term><term>Buccal concavity</term><term>Buccal contour</term><term>Case report</term><term>Case series</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical photographs</term><term>Clinical registrations</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Complete coverage</term><term>Computer measurements</term><term>Computerized technique</term><term>Connective tissue grafts</term><term>Cubic millimeter</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental implant treatment</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Entire cylinder</term><term>Exclusion criteria</term><term>Extraction sockets</term><term>Graft</term><term>Green line</term><term>Health service</term><term>High porosity</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Individual patients</term><term>Keratinized</term><term>Keratinized mucosa</term><term>Keratinized tissue</term><term>Keratinized tissue height</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary front region</term><term>Months postoperatively</term><term>Months tissue volume</term><term>Obvious increase</term><term>Open pore structure</term><term>Oral implant treatment</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Periodontics</term><term>Porous material</term><term>Postoperative</term><term>Postoperative problems</term><term>Postoperative study</term><term>Pretreatment</term><term>Reference model</term><term>Root coverage</term><term>Sagittal</term><term>Sagittal plane</term><term>Sagittal planes</term><term>Soft tissue augmentation</term><term>Soft tissue volume</term><term>Soft tissues</term><term>Squared pattern</term><term>Sterile saline solution</term><term>Study cast</term><term>Study period</term><term>Subjective evaluation</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical procedure</term><term>Tissue augmentation</term><term>Tissue shrinkage</term><term>Tissue volume</term><term>Total tissue volume</term><term>Treatment discomfort</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Background: Bony defects/concavities in the aesthetic zone of maxillae may interfere with the results of prosthetic procedures by producing shading superior to the crown. Such regions can be augmented either by bone or soft tissue autografts, allografts, or xenografts. Tissue shrinkage is thus anticipated, and a method to objectively measure the tissue change is valuable.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>buccal</json:string><json:string>augmentation</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>postoperative</json:string><json:string>artelon</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>buccal contour</json:string><json:string>soft tissue augmentation</json:string><json:string>porous material</json:string><json:string>reference model</json:string><json:string>pretreatment</json:string><json:string>sagittal</json:string><json:string>keratinized</json:string><json:string>periodontics</json:string><json:string>aesthetic zone</json:string><json:string>dental implant treatment</json:string><json:string>study period</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>graft</json:string><json:string>sagittal planes</json:string><json:string>clin implant dent relat</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>surgical procedure</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>case series</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>clinical photographs</json:string><json:string>postoperative study</json:string><json:string>obvious increase</json:string><json:string>clinical registrations</json:string><json:string>health service</json:string><json:string>alveolar bone</json:string><json:string>sagittal plane</json:string><json:string>maxillary front region</json:string><json:string>tissue volume</json:string><json:string>tissue augmentation</json:string><json:string>buccal concavity</json:string><json:string>antibiotic regime</json:string><json:string>case report</json:string><json:string>cubic millimeter</json:string><json:string>keratinized mucosa</json:string><json:string>connective tissue grafts</json:string><json:string>study cast</json:string><json:string>soft tissue volume</json:string><json:string>open pore structure</json:string><json:string>high porosity</json:string><json:string>keratinized tissue height</json:string><json:string>treatment discomfort</json:string><json:string>postoperative problems</json:string><json:string>soft tissues</json:string><json:string>bacterial contamination</json:string><json:string>complete coverage</json:string><json:string>entire cylinder</json:string><json:string>computer measurements</json:string><json:string>oral implant treatment</json:string><json:string>squared pattern</json:string><json:string>subjective evaluation</json:string><json:string>blue line</json:string><json:string>green line</json:string><json:string>months tissue volume</json:string><json:string>computerized technique</json:string><json:string>individual patients</json:string><json:string>months postoperatively</json:string><json:string>keratinized tissue</json:string><json:string>total tissue volume</json:string><json:string>exclusion criteria</json:string><json:string>bone grafts</json:string><json:string>augmentation material</json:string><json:string>tissue shrinkage</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>bertil friberg</json:string><json:string>clinical trial</json:string><json:string>root coverage</json:string><json:string>extraction sockets</json:string><json:string>sterile saline solution</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Bertil Friberg DDS, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Associated professor, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden;</json:string><json:string>E-mail: bertil.friberg@vgregion.se</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Torsten Jemt DDS, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>professor, Department Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, Sahlgrenska Akademin, University of Göteborg, Göteborg, Sweden and The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>aesthetics</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>augmentation</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>soft tissue graft</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>volumetric measurement</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID320</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-6NCSRWT9-H</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Background: Bony defects/concavities in the aesthetic zone of maxillae may interfere with the results of prosthetic procedures by producing shading superior to the crown. Such regions can be augmented either by bone or soft tissue autografts, allografts, or xenografts. Tissue shrinkage is thus anticipated, and a method to objectively measure the tissue change is valuable.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.609</score><pdfWordCount>3949</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>25052</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>585 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>55</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>374</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Soft Tissue Augmentation in Connection to Dental Implant Treatment Using a Synthetic, Porous Material – A Case Series with a 6‐Month Follow‐Up</title><pmid><json:string>21176097</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>14</volume><issue>6</issue><pages><first>872</first><last>881</last><total>10</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>ARTICLE</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2012</json:string><json:string>between September 2007 and June 2008</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</json:string><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>GOM International</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Gisselfält</json:string><json:string>Johansson</json:string><json:string>Sanz</json:string><json:string>Bertil Friberg</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-6NCSRWT9-H</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00320.x</json:string></doi><id>5BE40E2144C945A8B635A7DA2D6B479E27029912</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5BE40E2144C945A8B635A7DA2D6B479E27029912/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5BE40E2144C945A8B635A7DA2D6B479E27029912/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/5BE40E2144C945A8B635A7DA2D6B479E27029912/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Soft Tissue Augmentation in Connection to Dental Implant Treatment Using a Synthetic, Porous Material – A Case Series with a 6‐Month Follow‐Up</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2012-12"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Soft Tissue Augmentation in Connection to Dental Implant Treatment Using a Synthetic, Porous Material – A Case Series with a 6‐Month Follow‐Up</title><title level="a" type="short">Soft Tissue Augmentation in Connection to Dental Implant Treatment Using a Synthetic, Porous Material</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Bertil</forename><surname>Friberg</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Associated professor, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden;<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Dr. Bertil Friberg, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Clinic of Odontology, Medicinaregatan 12C, 413 90 Göteborg, Sweden; e‐mail: bertil.friberg@vgregion.se</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Torsten</forename><surname>Jemt</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>professor, Department Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, Sahlgrenska Akademin, University of Göteborg, Göteborg, Sweden and The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">5BE40E2144C945A8B635A7DA2D6B479E27029912</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-6NCSRWT9-H</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00320.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID320</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID320.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2012.14.issue-6</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="872">872</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="881">881</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-12"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p><hi rend="bold">Background:</hi> Bony defects/concavities in the aesthetic zone of maxillae may interfere with the results of prosthetic procedures by producing shading superior to the crown. Such regions can be augmented either by bone or soft tissue autografts, allografts, or xenografts. Tissue shrinkage is thus anticipated, and a method to objectively measure the tissue change is valuable.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Purpose:</hi> The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of a synthetic, porous material made of polyurethaneurea for buccal soft tissue augmentation in connection with implant placement in the maxillary front region. Further, to measure over time the change in buccal contour using a computerized technique.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and Methods:</hi> Ten patients received 12 Artelon® cylinders (5 × 10 mm) in connection to implant placement. Preoperative and postoperative (at 3 and 6 months) study casts were obtained for computer measurements, using the preoperative reference model as a base. The volume created between the surfaces of the reference model and each of the two following superimposed models was measured in cubic millimeter. Differences in volume from pretreatment to 3 and 6 months, respectively, were compared.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results:</hi> The clinical observation during follow‐up showed normal healing. The increase in mean buccal tissue volume was 50 mm<hi rend="superscript">3</hi> (SD 18) after 3 months and 43 mm<hi rend="superscript">3</hi> (SD 21) after 6 months, measured over a 6 mm × 8 mm area in the maxillary front region, in comparison to before insertion of the cylinder. The reduction from 3 to 6 months was not statistically significant (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> = .17).</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion:</hi> A synthetic, porous material for soft tissue augmentation was tested in connection to implant placement in the aesthetic zone of maxillae. The buccal contour was followed‐up for 6 months using a computer volumetric technique on preoperative and postoperative study casts. Measured tissue volume showed an obvious increase during the study period. The material was biologically well received.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">aesthetics</term><term xml:id="k2">augmentation</term><term xml:id="k3">soft tissue graft</term><term xml:id="k4">volumetric measurement</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>ARTICLES</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>ARTICLE</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5BE40E2144C945A8B635A7DA2D6B479E27029912/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="12106"><doi>10.1111/cid.2012.14.issue-6</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering number="14" type="journalVolume">14</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">6</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-12">December 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="110" status="forIssue" type="article"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00320.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID320"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="10"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title><title type="articleCategory">ARTICLE</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.1.9 mode:FullText" date="2012-12-02"></event><event date="2012-12-03" type="xmlCorrected"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2010-12-22"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-12-22"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-12-03"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">872</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">881</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Dr. Bertil Friberg, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Clinic of Odontology, Medicinaregatan 12C, 413 90 Göteborg, Sweden; e‐mail: <email>bertil.friberg@vgregion.se</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID320.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="6"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="2"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="32"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="3281"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Soft Tissue Augmentation in Connection to Dental Implant Treatment Using a Synthetic, Porous Material – A Case Series with a 6‐Month Follow‐Up</title><title type="shortAuthors">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Volume *, Number *, 2010</title><title type="short">Soft Tissue Augmentation in Connection to Dental Implant Treatment Using a Synthetic, Porous Material</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Bertil</givenNames><familyName>Friberg</familyName><degrees>DDS, PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Torsten</givenNames><familyName>Jemt</familyName><degrees>DDS, PhD</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Associated professor, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>professor, Department Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, Sahlgrenska Akademin, University of Göteborg, Göteborg, Sweden and The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">aesthetics</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">augmentation</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">soft tissue graft</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">volumetric measurement</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p><b>Background:</b> Bony defects/concavities in the aesthetic zone of maxillae may interfere with the results of prosthetic procedures by producing shading superior to the crown. Such regions can be augmented either by bone or soft tissue autografts, allografts, or xenografts. Tissue shrinkage is thus anticipated, and a method to objectively measure the tissue change is valuable.</p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of a synthetic, porous material made of polyurethaneurea for buccal soft tissue augmentation in connection with implant placement in the maxillary front region. Further, to measure over time the change in buccal contour using a computerized technique.</p><p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> Ten patients received 12 Artelon® cylinders (5 × 10 mm) in connection to implant placement. Preoperative and postoperative (at 3 and 6 months) study casts were obtained for computer measurements, using the preoperative reference model as a base. The volume created between the surfaces of the reference model and each of the two following superimposed models was measured in cubic millimeter. Differences in volume from pretreatment to 3 and 6 months, respectively, were compared.</p><p><b>Results:</b> The clinical observation during follow‐up showed normal healing. The increase in mean buccal tissue volume was 50 mm<sup>3</sup> (SD 18) after 3 months and 43 mm<sup>3</sup> (SD 21) after 6 months, measured over a 6 mm × 8 mm area in the maxillary front region, in comparison to before insertion of the cylinder. The reduction from 3 to 6 months was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = .17).</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> A synthetic, porous material for soft tissue augmentation was tested in connection to implant placement in the aesthetic zone of maxillae. The buccal contour was followed‐up for 6 months using a computer volumetric technique on preoperative and postoperative study casts. Measured tissue volume showed an obvious increase during the study period. The material was biologically well received.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Soft Tissue Augmentation in Connection to Dental Implant Treatment Using a Synthetic, Porous Material – A Case Series with a 6‐Month Follow‐Up</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Soft Tissue Augmentation in Connection to Dental Implant Treatment Using a Synthetic, Porous Material</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Soft Tissue Augmentation in Connection to Dental Implant Treatment Using a Synthetic, Porous Material – A Case Series with a 6‐Month Follow‐Up</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Bertil</namePart><namePart type="family">Friberg</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart><affiliation>Associated professor, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden;</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: bertil.friberg@vgregion.se</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Torsten</namePart><namePart type="family">Jemt</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart><affiliation>professor, Department Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, Sahlgrenska Akademin, University of Göteborg, Göteborg, Sweden and The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-12</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">6</extent><extent unit="tables">2</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">32</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">3281</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Background: Bony defects/concavities in the aesthetic zone of maxillae may interfere with the results of prosthetic procedures by producing shading superior to the crown. Such regions can be augmented either by bone or soft tissue autografts, allografts, or xenografts. Tissue shrinkage is thus anticipated, and a method to objectively measure the tissue change is valuable.</abstract><abstract>Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of a synthetic, porous material made of polyurethaneurea for buccal soft tissue augmentation in connection with implant placement in the maxillary front region. Further, to measure over time the change in buccal contour using a computerized technique.</abstract><abstract>Materials and Methods: Ten patients received 12 Artelon® cylinders (5 × 10 mm) in connection to implant placement. Preoperative and postoperative (at 3 and 6 months) study casts were obtained for computer measurements, using the preoperative reference model as a base. The volume created between the surfaces of the reference model and each of the two following superimposed models was measured in cubic millimeter. Differences in volume from pretreatment to 3 and 6 months, respectively, were compared.</abstract><abstract>Results: The clinical observation during follow‐up showed normal healing. The increase in mean buccal tissue volume was 50 mm3 (SD 18) after 3 months and 43 mm3 (SD 21) after 6 months, measured over a 6 mm × 8 mm area in the maxillary front region, in comparison to before insertion of the cylinder. The reduction from 3 to 6 months was not statistically significant (p = .17).</abstract><abstract>Conclusion: A synthetic, porous material for soft tissue augmentation was tested in connection to implant placement in the aesthetic zone of maxillae. The buccal contour was followed‐up for 6 months using a computer volumetric technique on preoperative and postoperative study casts. Measured tissue volume showed an obvious increase during the study period. The material was biologically well received.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>aesthetics</topic><topic>augmentation</topic><topic>soft tissue graft</topic><topic>volumetric measurement</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>ARTICLE</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>14</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>6</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>872</start><end>881</end><total>10</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">5BE40E2144C945A8B635A7DA2D6B479E27029912</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-6NCSRWT9-H</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00320.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID320</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5BE40E2144C945A8B635A7DA2D6B479E27029912/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002D17 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002D17 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:5BE40E2144C945A8B635A7DA2D6B479E27029912
|texte= Soft Tissue Augmentation in Connection to Dental Implant Treatment Using a Synthetic, Porous Material – A Case Series with a 6‐Month Follow‐Up
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |