Implant supported overdentures — the Leuven experience
Identifieur interne : 002B99 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002B98; suivant : 002C00Implant supported overdentures — the Leuven experience
Auteurs : M. Hooghe ; I. NaertSource :
- Journal of Dentistry [ 0300-5712 ] ; 1997.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Anterior region, Attachment, Attachments, Baseline, Belgium, Bone level, Branemark implants, Cumulative implant failure rate, Dentistry, Denture, Failure rate, First year, Frequency distribution, Hooghe, Implant, Implant failure, Implants, Leuven, Leuven experience, Loading time, Long axis, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular overdenture therapy, Marginal bone, Marginal bone height, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone loss, Maxilla, Naert, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Overdenture, Overdenture therapy, Overdentures, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Quirynen, Relining, Resilient, Resilient overdenture, Zarb index.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Anterior region, Attachment, Baseline, Belgium, Bone level, Branemark implants, Cumulative implant failure rate, Dentistry, Denture, Failure rate, First year, Frequency distribution, Hooghe, Implant, Implant failure, Leuven, Leuven experience, Loading time, Long axis, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular overdenture therapy, Marginal bone, Marginal bone height, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone loss, Maxilla, Naert, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Overdenture, Overdenture therapy, Overdentures, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Quirynen, Relining, Resilient, Resilient overdenture, Zarb index.
Abstract
Abstract: Objectives: This report covers a series of three different clinical longitudinal studies on the outcome of overdenture therapy when two (mandible) or four (maxilla) implants retaining a resilient overdenture are used.Conclusions: The resilient mandibular bar-retained overdenture on two implants is a very reliable treatment. Implant failure is low and the stability of the implants improves over time. Marginal bone remains stable once the first year has passed. The applied overdenture design is simple, versatile and very cost elfective. In the maxilla such implants do maintain their marginal bone level if splinted by means of a rigidly cast bar and when applied in a resilient overdenture therapy. Correct laboratory fabrication of the prosthesis is critical to the success of treatment. Clinically, overdenture aftercare is limited to renewal of used attachments. Patient satisfaction remains very positive to this form of treatment.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(97)87697-X
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:59613C8AC3D11150E101364877EEDC9F80D0C4F9Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Implant supported overdentures — the Leuven experience</title><author><name sortKey="Hooghe, M" sort="Hooghe, M" uniqKey="Hooghe M" first="M." last="Hooghe">M. Hooghe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer, 7 B-3000 Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Naert, I" sort="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I." last="Naert">I. Naert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer, 7 B-3000 Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:59613C8AC3D11150E101364877EEDC9F80D0C4F9</idno><date when="1997" year="1997">1997</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/S0300-5712(97)87697-X</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/59613C8AC3D11150E101364877EEDC9F80D0C4F9/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002B99</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002B99</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Implant supported overdentures — the Leuven experience</title><author><name sortKey="Hooghe, M" sort="Hooghe, M" uniqKey="Hooghe M" first="M." last="Hooghe">M. Hooghe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer, 7 B-3000 Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Naert, I" sort="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I." last="Naert">I. Naert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer, 7 B-3000 Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of Dentistry</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">JJOD</title><idno type="ISSN">0300-5712</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1997">1997</date><biblScope unit="volume">25</biblScope><biblScope unit="supplement">I1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="S25">S25</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="S32">S32</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0300-5712</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0300-5712</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Anterior region</term><term>Attachment</term><term>Attachments</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Belgium</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Branemark implants</term><term>Cumulative implant failure rate</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Failure rate</term><term>First year</term><term>Frequency distribution</term><term>Hooghe</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implants</term><term>Leuven</term><term>Leuven experience</term><term>Loading time</term><term>Long axis</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular overdenture therapy</term><term>Marginal bone</term><term>Marginal bone height</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Naert</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdenture therapy</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Quirynen</term><term>Relining</term><term>Resilient</term><term>Resilient overdenture</term><term>Zarb index</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Anterior region</term><term>Attachment</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Belgium</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Branemark implants</term><term>Cumulative implant failure rate</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Failure rate</term><term>First year</term><term>Frequency distribution</term><term>Hooghe</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Leuven</term><term>Leuven experience</term><term>Loading time</term><term>Long axis</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular overdenture therapy</term><term>Marginal bone</term><term>Marginal bone height</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Naert</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdenture therapy</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Quirynen</term><term>Relining</term><term>Resilient</term><term>Resilient overdenture</term><term>Zarb index</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: Objectives: This report covers a series of three different clinical longitudinal studies on the outcome of overdenture therapy when two (mandible) or four (maxilla) implants retaining a resilient overdenture are used.Conclusions: The resilient mandibular bar-retained overdenture on two implants is a very reliable treatment. Implant failure is low and the stability of the implants improves over time. Marginal bone remains stable once the first year has passed. The applied overdenture design is simple, versatile and very cost elfective. In the maxilla such implants do maintain their marginal bone level if splinted by means of a rigidly cast bar and when applied in a resilient overdenture therapy. Correct laboratory fabrication of the prosthesis is critical to the success of treatment. Clinically, overdenture aftercare is limited to renewal of used attachments. Patient satisfaction remains very positive to this form of treatment.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>overdenture</json:string><json:string>leuven</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>naert</json:string><json:string>overdentures</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>resilient</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>quirynen</json:string><json:string>abutment connection</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>hooghe</json:string><json:string>marginal bone height</json:string><json:string>relining</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>baseline</json:string><json:string>first year</json:string><json:string>marginal bone level</json:string><json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string><json:string>frequency distribution</json:string><json:string>implant failure</json:string><json:string>loading time</json:string><json:string>overdenture therapy</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>zarb index</json:string><json:string>failure rate</json:string><json:string>leuven experience</json:string><json:string>resilient overdenture</json:string><json:string>cumulative implant failure rate</json:string><json:string>branemark implants</json:string><json:string>marginal bone</json:string><json:string>mandibular overdenture therapy</json:string><json:string>anterior region</json:string><json:string>long axis</json:string><json:string>bone level</json:string><json:string>belgium</json:string><json:string>attachment</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>M. Hooghe</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer, 7 B-3000 Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>I. Naert</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer, 7 B-3000 Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Overdentures</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Attachments</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>87697</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/6H6-QBR91GKT-S</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>Full-length article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: Objectives: This report covers a series of three different clinical longitudinal studies on the outcome of overdenture therapy when two (mandible) or four (maxilla) implants retaining a resilient overdenture are used.Conclusions: The resilient mandibular bar-retained overdenture on two implants is a very reliable treatment. Implant failure is low and the stability of the implants improves over time. Marginal bone remains stable once the first year has passed. The applied overdenture design is simple, versatile and very cost elfective. In the maxilla such implants do maintain their marginal bone level if splinted by means of a rigidly cast bar and when applied in a resilient overdenture therapy. Correct laboratory fabrication of the prosthesis is critical to the success of treatment. Clinically, overdenture aftercare is limited to renewal of used attachments. Patient satisfaction remains very positive to this form of treatment.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.63</score><pdfWordCount>3950</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>25160</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>576 x 790 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>140</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>950</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>3</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Implant supported overdentures — the Leuven experience</title><pmid><json:string>9080749</json:string></pmid><pii><json:string>S0300-5712(97)87697-X</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Dentistry</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><publicationDate>1997</publicationDate><issn><json:string>0300-5712</json:string></issn><pii><json:string>S0300-5712(99)X0000-5</json:string></pii><volume>25</volume><pages><first>S25</first><last>S32</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1997</json:string><json:string>between August 1984 and November 1993</json:string><json:string>1988</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Sweden and Alphadent NY</json:string><json:string>Elsevier Science Ltd.</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery</json:string><json:string>Belgium ABSTRACT O</json:string><json:string>Catholic UniverSity</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>TIME Fig</json:string><json:string>M. Hooghe</json:string><json:string>M. Quirynen</json:string><json:string>The</json:string><json:string>D. van Steen</json:string><json:string>I. Naert</json:string><json:string>V. Mean</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Bergen op Zoom</json:string><json:string>Gothenburg</json:string><json:string>Leuven</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Biel</json:string><json:string>Belgium</json:string><json:string>Netherlands</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Engquist et al.</json:string><json:string>Lothigius et al.</json:string><json:string>Adell et al.</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/6H6-QBR91GKT-S</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1997</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1997</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1016/S0300-5712(97)87697-X</json:string></doi><id>59613C8AC3D11150E101364877EEDC9F80D0C4F9</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/59613C8AC3D11150E101364877EEDC9F80D0C4F9/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/59613C8AC3D11150E101364877EEDC9F80D0C4F9/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/59613C8AC3D11150E101364877EEDC9F80D0C4F9/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Implant supported overdentures — the Leuven experience</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>ELSEVIER</p></availability><date>1997</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Implant supported overdentures — the Leuven experience</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">M.</forename><surname>Hooghe</surname></persName><note type="correspondence"><p>Correspondence should be addressed to: M. Hooghe, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer, 7 B-3000 Leuven, Belgium</p></note><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer, 7 B-3000 Leuven, Belgium</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">I.</forename><surname>Naert</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer, 7 B-3000 Leuven, Belgium</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">59613C8AC3D11150E101364877EEDC9F80D0C4F9</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0300-5712(97)87697-X</idno><idno type="PII">S0300-5712(97)87697-X</idno><idno type="ArticleID">87697</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Journal of Dentistry</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">JJOD</title><idno type="pISSN">0300-5712</idno><idno type="PII">S0300-5712(99)X0000-5</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1997"></date><biblScope unit="volume">25</biblScope><biblScope unit="supplement">I1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="S25">S25</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="S32">S32</biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1997</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Objectives: This report covers a series of three different clinical longitudinal studies on the outcome of overdenture therapy when two (mandible) or four (maxilla) implants retaining a resilient overdenture are used.Conclusions: The resilient mandibular bar-retained overdenture on two implants is a very reliable treatment. Implant failure is low and the stability of the implants improves over time. Marginal bone remains stable once the first year has passed. The applied overdenture design is simple, versatile and very cost elfective. In the maxilla such implants do maintain their marginal bone level if splinted by means of a rigidly cast bar and when applied in a resilient overdenture therapy. Correct laboratory fabrication of the prosthesis is critical to the success of treatment. Clinically, overdenture aftercare is limited to renewal of used attachments. Patient satisfaction remains very positive to this form of treatment.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Key Words</head><item><term>Implants</term></item><item><term>Overdentures</term></item><item><term>Attachments</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1997">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/59613C8AC3D11150E101364877EEDC9F80D0C4F9/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier doc found" wicri:toSee="Elsevier, no converted or simple article"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" </istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 5.1.0//EN//XML" URI="art510.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><article version="5.1" xml:lang="en" docsubtype="fla"><item-info><jid>JJOD</jid><aid>87697</aid><ce:pii>S0300-5712(97)87697-X</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1016/S0300-5712(97)87697-X</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="unknown" year="1997"></ce:copyright></item-info><head><ce:title>Implant supported overdentures — the Leuven experience</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>M.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Hooghe</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="cor1"><ce:sup>*</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>I.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Naert</ce:surname></ce:author><ce:affiliation><ce:textfn>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer, 7 B-3000 Leuven, Belgium</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:correspondence id="cor1"><ce:label>*</ce:label><ce:text><ce:italic>Correspondence should be addressed to:</ce:italic> M. Hooghe, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer, 7 B-3000 Leuven, Belgium</ce:text></ce:correspondence></ce:author-group><ce:abstract id="ab1"><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para id="SP0005"><ce:italic>Objectives:</ce:italic> This report covers a series of three different clinical longitudinal studies on the outcome of overdenture therapy when two (mandible) or four (maxilla) implants retaining a resilient overdenture are used.</ce:simple-para><ce:simple-para id="SP0010"><ce:italic>Conclusions:</ce:italic> The resilient mandibular bar-retained overdenture on two implants is a very reliable treatment. Implant failure is low and the stability of the implants improves over time. Marginal bone remains stable once the first year has passed. The applied overdenture design is simple, versatile and very cost elfective. In the maxilla such implants do maintain their marginal bone level if splinted by means of a rigidly cast bar and when applied in a resilient overdenture therapy. Correct laboratory fabrication of the prosthesis is critical to the success of treatment. Clinically, overdenture aftercare is limited to renewal of used attachments. Patient satisfaction remains very positive to this form of treatment.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract><ce:keywords class="keyword"><ce:section-title>Key Words</ce:section-title><ce:keyword><ce:text>Implants</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Overdentures</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Attachments</ce:text></ce:keyword></ce:keywords></head><tail><ce:bibliography id="R0005"><ce:section-title>References</ce:section-title><ce:bibliography-sec id="RS0005"><ce:bib-reference id="bib1"><ce:label>1.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>G</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Zarb</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>A</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Smitt</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated implants supported overdentures: A prelimmary report on the Toronto study</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:edited-book><sb:editors><sb:editor><ce:given-name>E</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Schepers</ce:surname></sb:editor><sb:editor><ce:given-name>L</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Naert</ce:surname></sb:editor><sb:editor><ce:given-name>G</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Theuniers</ce:surname></sb:editor></sb:editors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Overdentures on implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:date>1992</sb:date><sb:publisher><sb:name>Leuven University Press</sb:name><sb:location>Leuven</sb:location></sb:publisher></sb:edited-book><sb:pages><sb:first-page>43</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>45</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib2"><ce:label>2.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>B</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Engquist</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Six years experience of splinted and no splinted implants supporting overdentures in upper and lower jaws</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:edited-book><sb:editors><sb:editor><ce:given-name>E</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Schepers</ce:surname></sb:editor><sb:editor><ce:given-name>I</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Naert</ce:surname></sb:editor><sb:editor><ce:given-name>G</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Theuniers</ce:surname></sb:editor></sb:editors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Overdentures on implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:date>1992</sb:date><sb:publisher><sb:name>Leuven University Press</sb:name><sb:location>Leuven</sb:location></sb:publisher></sb:edited-book><sb:pages><sb:first-page>43</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>45</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host><sb:host><sb:edited-book><sb:editors><sb:editor><ce:given-name>E</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Schepers</ce:surname></sb:editor><sb:editor><ce:given-name>I</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Naert</ce:surname></sb:editor><sb:editor><ce:given-name>G</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Theuniers</ce:surname></sb:editor></sb:editors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Overdentures on implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:date>1992</sb:date><sb:publisher><sb:name>Leuven University Press</sb:name><sb:location>Leuven</sb:location></sb:publisher></sb:edited-book><sb:pages><sb:first-page>27</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>413</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib3"><ce:label>3.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>R</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Adell</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>U</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Lekholm</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>B</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Rockler</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>PI</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Brånemark</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J of Oral Surg</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>10</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1981</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>387</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>416</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib4"><ce:label>4.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>B</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Engquist</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>T</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Bergendal</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>T</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Kallus</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>U</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Linden</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>A retrospective multicenter evaluation of osseointegrated implants supporting overdentures</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>3</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1988</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>129</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>134</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib5"><ce:label>5.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>I</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Naert</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>M</ce:given-name><ce:surname>De Clercq</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>G</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Theuniers</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>E</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Schepers</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants for thc edentulous mandible: a 2.5 year report</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>3</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1988</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>191</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>196</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib6"><ce:label>6.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>M</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Quirynen</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>I</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Naert</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>D</ce:given-name><ce:surname>van Steenberghe</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>J</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Teerlinck</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>C</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Dekeyser</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>G</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Theuniers</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Periodontal aspects of osseointegrated implants supporting an overdenture: a 4-year prospective study</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Clin Periodontol</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>18</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1991</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>719</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>728</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib7"><ce:label>7.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>I</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Naert</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>M</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Quirynen</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>G</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Theuniers</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>D</ce:given-name><ce:surname>van Steenberghe</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Prosthetic aspects of osseointegrated implants supporting overdentures. A 4-year report</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Prosthet Dent</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>65</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1991</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>671</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>680</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib8"><ce:label>8.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>M</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Quirynen</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>I</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Naert</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>D</ce:given-name><ce:surname>van Steenberghe</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Implant design and overload influence on marginal bone loss and implant success in the Brånemark system</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Clin Oral Impl Res</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>3</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1992</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>104</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>111</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib9"><ce:label>9.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>U</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Lekholm</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>GA</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Zarb</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Patient selection and preparation</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:edited-book><sb:editors><sb:editor><ce:given-name>PI</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Brånemark</ce:surname></sb:editor><sb:editor><ce:given-name>GA</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Zarb</ce:surname></sb:editor><sb:editor><ce:given-name>T</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Albreksson</ce:surname></sb:editor></sb:editors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Osseointegration in clinical dentistry</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:date>1985</sb:date><sb:publisher><sb:name>Chicago Quintessence Publ. Co. Inc.</sb:name><sb:location>Chicago</sb:location></sb:publisher></sb:edited-book><sb:pages><sb:first-page>199</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>209</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib10"><ce:label>10.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>R</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Mericske-Stern</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Clinical evaluation of overdenture restorations supported by osseointegrated titanium implants. A retrospective study</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>5</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1990</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>375</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>383</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib11"><ce:label>11.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>J</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Teerlinck</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>M</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Quirynen</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>P</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Darius</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>D</ce:given-name><ce:surname>van Steenberghe</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Periotest: An objective clinical diagnosis of bone apposition towards implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>6</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1991</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>55</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>61</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib12"><ce:label>12.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>I</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Naert</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>M</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Quirynen</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>D</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Hooghe M van Steenberghe</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>A comparative study of splinted and unsplinted Brånemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: A preliminary report</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Prosthet Dent</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>71</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1994</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>486</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>492</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib13"><ce:label>13.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>E</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Lothigius</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>H</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Smedberg</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>V</ce:given-name><ce:surname>De Buck</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>K</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Nilner</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>A new design for a hybrid prosthesis supported by osseointegrated implants: part I. Technical aspects</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>6</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1991</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>80</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>86</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference></ce:bibliography-sec></ce:bibliography></tail></article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Implant supported overdentures — the Leuven experience</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA"><title>Implant supported overdentures — the Leuven experience</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Hooghe</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer, 7 B-3000 Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><description>Correspondence should be addressed to: M. Hooghe, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer, 7 B-3000 Leuven, Belgium</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">I.</namePart><namePart type="family">Naert</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer, 7 B-3000 Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1997</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><abstract lang="en">Abstract: Objectives: This report covers a series of three different clinical longitudinal studies on the outcome of overdenture therapy when two (mandible) or four (maxilla) implants retaining a resilient overdenture are used.Conclusions: The resilient mandibular bar-retained overdenture on two implants is a very reliable treatment. Implant failure is low and the stability of the implants improves over time. Marginal bone remains stable once the first year has passed. The applied overdenture design is simple, versatile and very cost elfective. In the maxilla such implants do maintain their marginal bone level if splinted by means of a rigidly cast bar and when applied in a resilient overdenture therapy. Correct laboratory fabrication of the prosthesis is critical to the success of treatment. Clinically, overdenture aftercare is limited to renewal of used attachments. Patient satisfaction remains very positive to this form of treatment.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>Key Words</genre><topic>Implants</topic><topic>Overdentures</topic><topic>Attachments</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Dentistry</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>JJOD</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0300-5712</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0300-5712(99)X0000-5</identifier><part><date>1997</date><detail type="volume"><number>25</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="supplement"><number>I1</number><caption>Suppl.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue-pages"><start>S1</start><end>S47</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>S25</start><end>S32</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">59613C8AC3D11150E101364877EEDC9F80D0C4F9</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/6H6-QBR91GKT-S</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1016/S0300-5712(97)87697-X</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0300-5712(97)87697-X</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">87697</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-HKKZVM7B-M">elsevier</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/59613C8AC3D11150E101364877EEDC9F80D0C4F9/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002B99 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002B99 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:59613C8AC3D11150E101364877EEDC9F80D0C4F9
|texte= Implant supported overdentures — the Leuven experience
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |