Long‐term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient‐centred outcome) of the two‐implants‐supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 1: survival rate
Identifieur interne : 002B90 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002B89; suivant : 002B91Long‐term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient‐centred outcome) of the two‐implants‐supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 1: survival rate
Auteurs : M. Vercruyssen ; K. Marcelis ; W. Coucke ; I. Naert ; M. QuirynenSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2010-04.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment connection, Awad, Ball attachments, Bone quality, Branemark, Catholic university leuven, Clin, Clinical periodontology, Complete dentures, Conventional dentures, Dehiscence, Dental research, Dentistry, Denture, Early failures, Early loading, Edentulous, Edentulous adults, Edentulous patients, Endosseous implants, Feine, Immediate implant placement, Immediate placement, Impl, Implant, Implant insertion, Implant length, Implant survival, Implants research, International journal, John wiley sons, Last visit, Late failures, Leuven, Lund, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular overdentures, Mandibular prostheses, Masticatory function, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial surgery, Naert, Older people, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Osseointegrated implants, Overdenture, Overdenture therapy, Overdentures, Patient satisfaction, Periodontitis, Periodontology, Possible factors, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Quirynen, Raghoebar, Randomized, Retrospective, Retrospective analysis, Retrospective evaluation, Retrospective study, Smoker, Study population, Surgical protocol, Survival rate, Systematic review, Tooth loss, Vercruyssen.
- Teeft :
- Abutment connection, Awad, Ball attachments, Bone quality, Branemark, Catholic university leuven, Clin, Clinical periodontology, Complete dentures, Conventional dentures, Dehiscence, Dental research, Dentistry, Denture, Early failures, Early loading, Edentulous, Edentulous adults, Edentulous patients, Endosseous implants, Feine, Immediate implant placement, Immediate placement, Impl, Implant, Implant insertion, Implant length, Implant survival, Implants research, International journal, John wiley sons, Last visit, Late failures, Leuven, Lund, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular overdentures, Mandibular prostheses, Masticatory function, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial surgery, Naert, Older people, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Osseointegrated implants, Overdenture, Overdenture therapy, Overdentures, Patient satisfaction, Periodontitis, Periodontology, Possible factors, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Quirynen, Raghoebar, Randomized, Retrospective, Retrospective analysis, Retrospective evaluation, Retrospective study, Smoker, Study population, Surgical protocol, Survival rate, Systematic review, Tooth loss, Vercruyssen.
Abstract
Objective: This retrospective analysis evaluated the long‐term outcome of two implants supporting an overdenture in the mandible, as well as the significance of some confounding factors (smoking, implant length, bone quality).
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01849.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:59436D37BA5B8590AEF2AA814B8E8E1013A3EAC5Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Long‐term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient‐centred outcome) of the two‐implants‐supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 1: survival rate</title><author><name sortKey="Vercruyssen, M" sort="Vercruyssen, M" uniqKey="Vercruyssen M" first="M." last="Vercruyssen">M. Vercruyssen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Marcelis, K" sort="Marcelis, K" uniqKey="Marcelis K" first="K." last="Marcelis">K. Marcelis</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Coucke, W" sort="Coucke, W" uniqKey="Coucke W" first="W." last="Coucke">W. Coucke</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Clinical Biology, Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Naert, I" sort="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I." last="Naert">I. Naert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M." last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:59436D37BA5B8590AEF2AA814B8E8E1013A3EAC5</idno><date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01849.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/59436D37BA5B8590AEF2AA814B8E8E1013A3EAC5/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002B90</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002B90</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Long‐term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient‐centred outcome) of the two‐implants‐supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 1: survival rate</title><author><name sortKey="Vercruyssen, M" sort="Vercruyssen, M" uniqKey="Vercruyssen M" first="M." last="Vercruyssen">M. Vercruyssen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Marcelis, K" sort="Marcelis, K" uniqKey="Marcelis K" first="K." last="Marcelis">K. Marcelis</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Coucke, W" sort="Coucke, W" uniqKey="Coucke W" first="W." last="Coucke">W. Coucke</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Clinical Biology, Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Naert, I" sort="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I." last="Naert">I. Naert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M." last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">21</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="357">357</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="365">365</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-04">2010-04</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Awad</term><term>Ball attachments</term><term>Bone quality</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Catholic university leuven</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Conventional dentures</term><term>Dehiscence</term><term>Dental research</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Early failures</term><term>Early loading</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous adults</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Endosseous implants</term><term>Feine</term><term>Immediate implant placement</term><term>Immediate placement</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant insertion</term><term>Implant length</term><term>Implant survival</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Last visit</term><term>Late failures</term><term>Leuven</term><term>Lund</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Mandibular prostheses</term><term>Masticatory function</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Naert</term><term>Older people</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdenture therapy</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Periodontitis</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Possible factors</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Quirynen</term><term>Raghoebar</term><term>Randomized</term><term>Retrospective</term><term>Retrospective analysis</term><term>Retrospective evaluation</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Smoker</term><term>Study population</term><term>Surgical protocol</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Tooth loss</term><term>Vercruyssen</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Awad</term><term>Ball attachments</term><term>Bone quality</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Catholic university leuven</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Conventional dentures</term><term>Dehiscence</term><term>Dental research</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Early failures</term><term>Early loading</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous adults</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Endosseous implants</term><term>Feine</term><term>Immediate implant placement</term><term>Immediate placement</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant insertion</term><term>Implant length</term><term>Implant survival</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Last visit</term><term>Late failures</term><term>Leuven</term><term>Lund</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Mandibular prostheses</term><term>Masticatory function</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Naert</term><term>Older people</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdenture therapy</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Periodontitis</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Possible factors</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Quirynen</term><term>Raghoebar</term><term>Randomized</term><term>Retrospective</term><term>Retrospective analysis</term><term>Retrospective evaluation</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Smoker</term><term>Study population</term><term>Surgical protocol</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Tooth loss</term><term>Vercruyssen</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Objective: This retrospective analysis evaluated the long‐term outcome of two implants supporting an overdenture in the mandible, as well as the significance of some confounding factors (smoking, implant length, bone quality).</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>overdenture</json:string><json:string>overdentures</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>feine</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>naert</json:string><json:string>quirynen</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>vercruyssen</json:string><json:string>periodontology</json:string><json:string>periodontitis</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>impl</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>smoker</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>dental research</json:string><json:string>study population</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>branemark</json:string><json:string>survival rate</json:string><json:string>bone quality</json:string><json:string>leuven</json:string><json:string>randomized</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>awad</json:string><json:string>mandibular overdentures</json:string><json:string>patient satisfaction</json:string><json:string>dehiscence</json:string><json:string>implant length</json:string><json:string>raghoebar</json:string><json:string>implant survival</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>retrospective</json:string><json:string>retrospective study</json:string><json:string>last visit</json:string><json:string>lund</json:string><json:string>mandibular prostheses</json:string><json:string>abutment connection</json:string><json:string>implant insertion</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>ball attachments</json:string><json:string>clinical periodontology</json:string><json:string>late failures</json:string><json:string>retrospective evaluation</json:string><json:string>immediate placement</json:string><json:string>systematic review</json:string><json:string>edentulous adults</json:string><json:string>masticatory function</json:string><json:string>catholic university leuven</json:string><json:string>conventional dentures</json:string><json:string>early loading</json:string><json:string>overdenture therapy</json:string><json:string>endosseous implants</json:string><json:string>possible factors</json:string><json:string>early failures</json:string><json:string>immediate implant placement</json:string><json:string>tooth loss</json:string><json:string>retrospective analysis</json:string><json:string>surgical protocol</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial surgery</json:string><json:string>complete dentures</json:string><json:string>older people</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>M. Vercruyssen</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>K. Marcelis</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>W. Coucke</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Clinical Biology, Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>I. Naert</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>M. Quirynen</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant survival</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>mandible</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>overdenture</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>survival</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>susceptibility</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR1849</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-SB8BGZXH-L</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Objective: This retrospective analysis evaluated the long‐term outcome of two implants supporting an overdenture in the mandible, as well as the significance of some confounding factors (smoking, implant length, bone quality).</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.372</score><pdfWordCount>5274</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>36219</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>31</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>226</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>6</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Long‐term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient‐centred outcome) of the two‐implants‐supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 1: survival rate</title><pmid><json:string>20105198</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><pages><first>357</first><last>365</last><total>9</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1051</json:string><json:string>2003</json:string><json:string>2010</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Department of Clinical Biology, Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium I</json:string><json:string>Hospital of the Catholic University Leuven</json:string><json:string>Department of Periodontology</json:string><json:string>Marjolein Vercuyssen Department of Periodontology Catholic University Leuven Kapucijnenvoer</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Correspondence</json:string><json:string>Leuven Belgium Tel</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>K. Marcelis</json:string><json:string>M. Quirynen</json:string><json:string>Table</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Lund</json:string><json:string>Bergen op Zoom</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Netherlands</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Sheiham et al. 2001</json:string><json:string>Awad et al. 1998, 2000</json:string><json:string>Renvert & Persson 2009</json:string><json:string>Davis 1998</json:string><json:string>Millwood & Heath 2000</json:string><json:string>Sanz et al. 1991</json:string><json:string>Buser et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Lindquist et al. 1988</json:string><json:string>Johns et al.</json:string><json:string>Vercruyssen et al</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Bain & Moy 1993</json:string><json:string>de Grandmont et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Fugazzotto 2001</json:string><json:string>Henshaw & Calabrese 2001</json:string><json:string>Allen & McMillan 1999</json:string><json:string>Lee et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Naert et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Rosenberg et al. 1991</json:string><json:string>Feine et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Moynihan et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Morais et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Steele et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Berglundh et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Bakke et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Ekfeldt et al. 1997, 2001</json:string><json:string>Allen et al. 2001, 2006</json:string><json:string>Feine et al. 1994a</json:string><json:string>Awad et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Aykent et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Jemt (2008)</json:string><json:string>Karoussis et al. (2003)</json:string><json:string>Thomason et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Feine et al. 1994a, 1994b</json:string><json:string>Block & Kent 1990</json:string><json:string>Schropp & Isidor 2008</json:string><json:string>Sanna et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Geissler & Bates 1984</json:string><json:string>Joshipura et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Branemark et al. 1977</json:string><json:string>Buser et al. (1997)</json:string><json:string>Boerrigter et al. 1995a, 1995b</json:string><json:string>Mengel et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Shimazaki et al. 2001</json:string><json:string>Slade et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Ahlqvist et al. 1990</json:string><json:string>Ellis et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Becker et al. (1999)</json:string><json:string>Alsaadi et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Jemt et al. 1989</json:string><json:string>Naert et al. 1992, 2001a, 2001b</json:string><json:string>Tonetti & Schmid 1994</json:string><json:string>Adell et al. 1981</json:string><json:string>Meijer et al. (2005)</json:string><json:string>Friberg et al. (2008)</json:string><json:string>Meijer et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Allen & McMillan 2003</json:string><json:string>Jones et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Woo et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Osterberg & Steen 1982</json:string><json:string>Raghoebar et al. 2001</json:string><json:string>Heydecke et al. 2003, 2005</json:string><json:string>Sheiham et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Evian et al. 2004</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-SB8BGZXH-L</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2010</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2010</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01849.x</json:string></doi><id>59436D37BA5B8590AEF2AA814B8E8E1013A3EAC5</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/59436D37BA5B8590AEF2AA814B8E8E1013A3EAC5/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/59436D37BA5B8590AEF2AA814B8E8E1013A3EAC5/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/59436D37BA5B8590AEF2AA814B8E8E1013A3EAC5/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Long‐term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient‐centred outcome) of the two‐implants‐supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 1: survival rate</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2010-04"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Long‐term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient‐centred outcome) of the two‐implants‐supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 1: survival rate</title><title level="a" type="short">Overdentures in mandible: survival</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">M.</forename><surname>Vercruyssen</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">K.</forename><surname>Marcelis</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">W.</forename><surname>Coucke</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Clinical Biology, Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">I.</forename><surname>Naert</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">M.</forename><surname>Quirynen</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">59436D37BA5B8590AEF2AA814B8E8E1013A3EAC5</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-SB8BGZXH-L</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01849.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR1849</idno><idno type="supplier">1849</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR1849.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2010.21.issue-4</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">21</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="357">357</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="365">365</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-04"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p><hi rend="bold">Objective: </hi> This retrospective analysis evaluated the long‐term outcome of two implants supporting an overdenture in the mandible, as well as the significance of some confounding factors (smoking, implant length, bone quality).</p><p><hi rend="bold">Material and methods: </hi> All mandibular overdenture cases (<hi rend="italic">n</hi>=495) treated during the past 25 years in our centre (with ≥5 years loading of the implants) were included in this study. General information (medical history, implant data, report on surgery) was retrieved from the patient's file. A large number of patients (<hi rend="italic">n</hi>=248) were willing to visit the clinic for an additional follow‐up visit. For the others, information on implant survival was collected by phone (<hi rend="italic">n</hi>=121), or contact was impossible (57 had died, three were hospitalized and 66 could not be reached). In the latter group, information was used, up to their last visit to the clinic. An implant was considered as surviving if it was still in function in the mouth, without clear adverse effects (pain, swelling, mobility). A failure was defined as early if it occurred within the window, insertion‐final prosthesis placement; afterwards, it was considered as late.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi> Most of the inserted implants (Brånemark type) were of the turned (machined) type (95.5%), the remainder was anodized (TiUnite). The anchoring system was either a bar (86.3%), ball attachments (11.7%) or magnets (1.6%), and only some patients changed from one to the other (0.4%). Kaplan–Meier analyses showed a survival rate of 95.5% after 20 years of loading. Factors that influenced the outcome included smoking (90% rate for smokers) and the surgical protocol (reduced survival rate for one‐stage‐placed implants). Implant length and bone quality had no impact.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusions: </hi> These results fully support the two‐implant overdenture concept in the mandible even in the long run.</p><p>
<hi rend="bold">To cite this article:</hi>
Vercruyssen M, Marcelis K, Coucke W, Naert I, Quirynen M. Long‐term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient‐centred outcome) of the two‐implants‐supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 1: survival rate.
<hi rend="italic">Clin. Oral Impl. Res</hi>. <hi rend="bold">21</hi>, 2010; 357–365.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01849.x</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">implants</term><term xml:id="k2">implant survival</term><term xml:id="k3">mandible</term><term xml:id="k4">overdenture</term><term xml:id="k5">survival</term><term xml:id="k6">susceptibility</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/59436D37BA5B8590AEF2AA814B8E8E1013A3EAC5/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="04004"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2010.21.issue-4</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="21">21</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="4">4</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2010-04">April 2010</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="1" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01849.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR1849"></id><id type="supplier" value="1849"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="9"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-01-22"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2010-03-10"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-13"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="357">357</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="365">365</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><b>Correspondence to:</b>
<i>Marjolein Vercuyssen</i>
Department of Periodontology
Catholic University Leuven
Kapucijnenvoer 33
B‐3000 Leuven
Belgium
Tel.: +00 32 163 32483
Fax: +00 32 163 32484
e‐mail: <email normalForm="marjolein.vercruyssen@uz.kuleuven.ac.be">marjolein.vercruyssen@uz.kuleuven.ac.be</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR1849.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Date:</b> Accepted 27 August 2009</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="2"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="3"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="72"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="7786"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="43"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Long‐term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient‐centred outcome) of the two‐implants‐supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 1: survival rate</title><title type="shortAuthors">Vercruyssen et al.</title><title type="short">Overdentures in mandible: survival</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>M.</givenNames><familyName>Vercruyssen</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>K.</givenNames><familyName>Marcelis</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>W.</givenNames><familyName>Coucke</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>I.</givenNames><familyName>Naert</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>M.</givenNames><familyName>Quirynen</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Clinical Biology, Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">implant survival</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">mandible</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">overdenture</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">survival</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">susceptibility</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p><b>Objective: </b> This retrospective analysis evaluated the long‐term outcome of two implants supporting an overdenture in the mandible, as well as the significance of some confounding factors (smoking, implant length, bone quality).</p><p><b>Material and methods: </b> All mandibular overdenture cases (<i>n</i>=495) treated during the past 25 years in our centre (with ≥5 years loading of the implants) were included in this study. General information (medical history, implant data, report on surgery) was retrieved from the patient's file. A large number of patients (<i>n</i>=248) were willing to visit the clinic for an additional follow‐up visit. For the others, information on implant survival was collected by phone (<i>n</i>=121), or contact was impossible (57 had died, three were hospitalized and 66 could not be reached). In the latter group, information was used, up to their last visit to the clinic. An implant was considered as surviving if it was still in function in the mouth, without clear adverse effects (pain, swelling, mobility). A failure was defined as early if it occurred within the window, insertion‐final prosthesis placement; afterwards, it was considered as late.</p><p><b>Results: </b> Most of the inserted implants (Brånemark type) were of the turned (machined) type (95.5%), the remainder was anodized (TiUnite). The anchoring system was either a bar (86.3%), ball attachments (11.7%) or magnets (1.6%), and only some patients changed from one to the other (0.4%). Kaplan–Meier analyses showed a survival rate of 95.5% after 20 years of loading. Factors that influenced the outcome included smoking (90% rate for smokers) and the surgical protocol (reduced survival rate for one‐stage‐placed implants). Implant length and bone quality had no impact.</p><p><b>Conclusions: </b> These results fully support the two‐implant overdenture concept in the mandible even in the long run.</p><p> <b>To cite this article:</b>
Vercruyssen M, Marcelis K, Coucke W, Naert I, Quirynen M. Long‐term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient‐centred outcome) of the two‐implants‐supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 1: survival rate.
<i>Clin. Oral Impl. Res</i>. <b>21</b>, 2010; 357–365.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01849.x</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Long‐term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient‐centred outcome) of the two‐implants‐supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 1: survival rate</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Overdentures in mandible: survival</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Long‐term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient‐centred outcome) of the two‐implants‐supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 1: survival rate</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Vercruyssen</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">K.</namePart><namePart type="family">Marcelis</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">W.</namePart><namePart type="family">Coucke</namePart><affiliation>Department of Clinical Biology, Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">I.</namePart><namePart type="family">Naert</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Quirynen</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2010-04</dateIssued><edition>Date: Accepted 27 August 2009</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">2</extent><extent unit="tables">3</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">72</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">43</extent><extent unit="words">7786</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Objective: This retrospective analysis evaluated the long‐term outcome of two implants supporting an overdenture in the mandible, as well as the significance of some confounding factors (smoking, implant length, bone quality).</abstract><abstract>Material and methods: All mandibular overdenture cases (n=495) treated during the past 25 years in our centre (with ≥5 years loading of the implants) were included in this study. General information (medical history, implant data, report on surgery) was retrieved from the patient's file. A large number of patients (n=248) were willing to visit the clinic for an additional follow‐up visit. For the others, information on implant survival was collected by phone (n=121), or contact was impossible (57 had died, three were hospitalized and 66 could not be reached). In the latter group, information was used, up to their last visit to the clinic. An implant was considered as surviving if it was still in function in the mouth, without clear adverse effects (pain, swelling, mobility). A failure was defined as early if it occurred within the window, insertion‐final prosthesis placement; afterwards, it was considered as late.</abstract><abstract>Results: Most of the inserted implants (Brånemark type) were of the turned (machined) type (95.5%), the remainder was anodized (TiUnite). The anchoring system was either a bar (86.3%), ball attachments (11.7%) or magnets (1.6%), and only some patients changed from one to the other (0.4%). Kaplan–Meier analyses showed a survival rate of 95.5% after 20 years of loading. Factors that influenced the outcome included smoking (90% rate for smokers) and the surgical protocol (reduced survival rate for one‐stage‐placed implants). Implant length and bone quality had no impact.</abstract><abstract>Conclusions: These results fully support the two‐implant overdenture concept in the mandible even in the long run.</abstract><abstract>To cite this article:
Vercruyssen M, Marcelis K, Coucke W, Naert I, Quirynen M. Long‐term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient‐centred outcome) of the two‐implants‐supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 1: survival rate.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21, 2010; 357–365.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01849.x</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>implants</topic><topic>implant survival</topic><topic>mandible</topic><topic>overdenture</topic><topic>survival</topic><topic>susceptibility</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2010</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>21</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>357</start><end>365</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">59436D37BA5B8590AEF2AA814B8E8E1013A3EAC5</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-SB8BGZXH-L</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01849.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR1849</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/59436D37BA5B8590AEF2AA814B8E8E1013A3EAC5/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002B90 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002B90 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:59436D37BA5B8590AEF2AA814B8E8E1013A3EAC5
|texte= Long‐term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient‐centred outcome) of the two‐implants‐supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 1: survival rate
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |