A Retrospective 5‐Year Follow‐Up Study of Two Different Titanium Implant Surfaces Used after Interpositional Bone Grafting for Reconstruction of the Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla
Identifieur interne : 002B43 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002B42; suivant : 002B44A Retrospective 5‐Year Follow‐Up Study of Two Different Titanium Implant Surfaces Used after Interpositional Bone Grafting for Reconstruction of the Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla
Auteurs : Mats Hallman ; Arne Mordenfeld ; Tomas StrandkvistSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2005-07.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment connection, Astra, Astra tech, Astra tech group, Astra tech implants, Bone blocks, Bone graft, Branemark, Branemark group, Branemark implants, Clinical implant dentistry, Consecutive patients, Dental implants, Different implant systems, Donor site, Fibrin glue, Functional loading, Graft, Implant, Implant failures, Implant placement, Implant success, Interpositional, Interpositional bone, Local anesthesia, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone loss, Marginal bone resorption, Maxilla, Maxillary, Maxillary sinus, Maxillofac, Nystrom, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral maxillofac surg, Osteotomy, Present study, Prosthesis, Recipient site, Resorbed maxilla, Sinus, Statistical difference, Surg, Survival rates.
- Teeft :
- Abutment connection, Astra, Astra tech, Astra tech group, Astra tech implants, Bone blocks, Bone graft, Branemark, Branemark group, Branemark implants, Clinical implant dentistry, Consecutive patients, Dental implants, Different implant systems, Donor site, Fibrin glue, Functional loading, Graft, Implant, Implant failures, Implant placement, Implant success, Interpositional, Interpositional bone, Local anesthesia, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone loss, Marginal bone resorption, Maxilla, Maxillary, Maxillary sinus, Maxillofac, Nystrom, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral maxillofac surg, Osteotomy, Present study, Prosthesis, Recipient site, Resorbed maxilla, Sinus, Statistical difference, Surg, Survival rates.
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00055.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:583BC9AD44A0946166F2EC9035224D891173383ELe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A Retrospective 5‐Year Follow‐Up Study of Two Different Titanium Implant Surfaces Used after Interpositional Bone Grafting for Reconstruction of the Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla</title><author><name sortKey="Hallman, Mats" sort="Hallman, Mats" uniqKey="Hallman M" first="Mats" last="Hallman">Mats Hallman</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Public Health Service, Gävle City, Sweden; Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University, County Council of Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: mats.hallman@lg.se</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mordenfeld, Arne" sort="Mordenfeld, Arne" uniqKey="Mordenfeld A" first="Arne" last="Mordenfeld">Arne Mordenfeld</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Public Health Service, Gävle City, Sweden; Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University, County Council of Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Strandkvist, Tomas" sort="Strandkvist, Tomas" uniqKey="Strandkvist T" first="Tomas" last="Strandkvist">Tomas Strandkvist</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Public Health Service, Gävle City, Sweden; Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University, County Council of Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:583BC9AD44A0946166F2EC9035224D891173383E</idno><date when="2005" year="2005">2005</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00055.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/583BC9AD44A0946166F2EC9035224D891173383E/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002B43</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002B43</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A Retrospective 5‐Year Follow‐Up Study of Two Different Titanium Implant Surfaces Used after Interpositional Bone Grafting for Reconstruction of the Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla</title><author><name sortKey="Hallman, Mats" sort="Hallman, Mats" uniqKey="Hallman M" first="Mats" last="Hallman">Mats Hallman</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Public Health Service, Gävle City, Sweden; Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University, County Council of Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: mats.hallman@lg.se</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mordenfeld, Arne" sort="Mordenfeld, Arne" uniqKey="Mordenfeld A" first="Arne" last="Mordenfeld">Arne Mordenfeld</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Public Health Service, Gävle City, Sweden; Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University, County Council of Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Strandkvist, Tomas" sort="Strandkvist, Tomas" uniqKey="Strandkvist T" first="Tomas" last="Strandkvist">Tomas Strandkvist</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Public Health Service, Gävle City, Sweden; Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University, County Council of Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="121">121</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="126">126</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2005-07">2005-07</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Astra</term><term>Astra tech</term><term>Astra tech group</term><term>Astra tech implants</term><term>Bone blocks</term><term>Bone graft</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Branemark group</term><term>Branemark implants</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Consecutive patients</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Different implant systems</term><term>Donor site</term><term>Fibrin glue</term><term>Functional loading</term><term>Graft</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failures</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant success</term><term>Interpositional</term><term>Interpositional bone</term><term>Local anesthesia</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Marginal bone resorption</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary sinus</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Nystrom</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral maxillofac surg</term><term>Osteotomy</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Recipient site</term><term>Resorbed maxilla</term><term>Sinus</term><term>Statistical difference</term><term>Surg</term><term>Survival rates</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Astra</term><term>Astra tech</term><term>Astra tech group</term><term>Astra tech implants</term><term>Bone blocks</term><term>Bone graft</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Branemark group</term><term>Branemark implants</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Consecutive patients</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Different implant systems</term><term>Donor site</term><term>Fibrin glue</term><term>Functional loading</term><term>Graft</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failures</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant success</term><term>Interpositional</term><term>Interpositional bone</term><term>Local anesthesia</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Marginal bone resorption</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary sinus</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Nystrom</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral maxillofac surg</term><term>Osteotomy</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Recipient site</term><term>Resorbed maxilla</term><term>Sinus</term><term>Statistical difference</term><term>Surg</term><term>Survival rates</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">ABSTRACT</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>branemark</json:string><json:string>interpositional</json:string><json:string>interpositional bone</json:string><json:string>osteotomy</json:string><json:string>astra tech group</json:string><json:string>astra</json:string><json:string>maxillary</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>branemark implants</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>surg</json:string><json:string>maxillofac</json:string><json:string>graft</json:string><json:string>branemark group</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>nystrom</json:string><json:string>astra tech implants</json:string><json:string>statistical difference</json:string><json:string>marginal bone resorption</json:string><json:string>consecutive patients</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac surg</json:string><json:string>astra tech</json:string><json:string>different implant systems</json:string><json:string>donor site</json:string><json:string>functional loading</json:string><json:string>sinus</json:string><json:string>implant success</json:string><json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string><json:string>recipient site</json:string><json:string>maxillary sinus</json:string><json:string>fibrin glue</json:string><json:string>resorbed maxilla</json:string><json:string>implant failures</json:string><json:string>marginal bone level</json:string><json:string>survival rates</json:string><json:string>abutment connection</json:string><json:string>bone graft</json:string><json:string>local anesthesia</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>bone blocks</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Mats Hallman DDS, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Public Health Service, Gävle City, Sweden; Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University, County Council of Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden</json:string><json:string>E-mail: mats.hallman@lg.se</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Arne Mordenfeld DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Public Health Service, Gävle City, Sweden; Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University, County Council of Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Tomas Strandkvist DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Public Health Service, Gävle City, Sweden; Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University, County Council of Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>comparative study</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implant surface</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>fibrin glue</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>interpositional bone grafting</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Le Fort I osteotomy</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID121</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-6S8N1Z7P-X</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>ABSTRACT</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>1</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>8</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount><score>5.574</score><pdfWordCount>3562</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>21415</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>6</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>585 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>A Retrospective 5‐Year Follow‐Up Study of Two Different Titanium Implant Surfaces Used after Interpositional Bone Grafting for Reconstruction of the Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla</title><pmid><json:string>16219241</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><pages><first>121</first><last>126</last><total>6</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2005</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Research and Development, Uppsala</json:string><json:string>SPSS Inc., Chicago</json:string><json:string>BC Decker Inc</json:string><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>Gavle Hospital, SE</json:string><json:string>Sweden Reprint</json:string><json:string>Ethicon, Inc.</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Tomas Strandkvist</json:string><json:string>Farell</json:string><json:string>Ivanoff</json:string><json:string>Astrand</json:string><json:string>Mats Hallman</json:string><json:string>Nystrom</json:string><json:string>Kahnberg</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Gavle City</json:string><json:string>Austria</json:string><json:string>Somerville</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>Japan</json:string><json:string>Vienna</json:string><json:string>Tokyo</json:string><json:string>Stockholm</json:string><json:string>NJ</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-6S8N1Z7P-X</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2005</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2005</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00055.x</json:string></doi><id>583BC9AD44A0946166F2EC9035224D891173383E</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/583BC9AD44A0946166F2EC9035224D891173383E/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/583BC9AD44A0946166F2EC9035224D891173383E/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/583BC9AD44A0946166F2EC9035224D891173383E/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">A Retrospective 5‐Year Follow‐Up Study of Two Different Titanium Implant Surfaces Used after Interpositional Bone Grafting for Reconstruction of the Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2005-07"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A Retrospective 5‐Year Follow‐Up Study of Two Different Titanium Implant Surfaces Used after Interpositional Bone Grafting for Reconstruction of the Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Mats</forename><surname>Hallman</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Public Health Service, Gävle City, Sweden; Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University, County Council of Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Reprint requests: Dr Mats Hallman, Clinic for Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Public Health Service, Gävle Hospital, SE 80187 Gävle, Sweden; e‐mail: mats.hallman@lg.se</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Arne</forename><surname>Mordenfeld</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Public Health Service, Gävle City, Sweden; Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University, County Council of Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Tomas</forename><surname>Strandkvist</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Public Health Service, Gävle City, Sweden; Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University, County Council of Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">583BC9AD44A0946166F2EC9035224D891173383E</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-6S8N1Z7P-X</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00055.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID121</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID121.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2005.7.issue-3</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="121">121</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="126">126</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2005-07"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main">
ABSTRACT
Background:
<p>Long‐term comparative follow‐up studies of dental implants placed in augmented bone are rare. Variations in design and surface roughness have been found to be important for bone integration of implants. However, there is no clinical evidence that such variations lead to an improved clinical outcome.</p>
Purpose:
<p>To compare two different implant systems used after interpositional bone grafting of the severely resorbed maxilla with a modified augmentation technique using fibrin glue.</p>
Materials and Methods:
<p>Twenty‐two consecutive patients presenting with severe maxillary atrophy underwent reconstruction with Le Fort I osteotomies and interpositional bone grafting. Before placement of bone blocks, the floors of the maxillary sinuses were packed with bone chips mixed with a fibrin glue, to stabilize the graft. After 6 months of graft healing, the first 11 consecutive patients received Brånemark System® implants with a turned surface (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden). The following 11 consecutive patients were treated with Astra Tech implants with a blasted titanium surface (Astra Tech AB, Molndal, Sweden). All patients received fixed prostheses. Marginal bone resorption and donor and recipient site morbidity were evaluated. All patients were clinically and radiographically observed throughout 5 years of functional loading.</p>
Results:
<p>In the Brånemark group, 11 (13%) of 84 placed implants were lost, compared to 4 (5.5%) of 72 placed implants in the Astra Tech group. The difference was not significant. All patients retained fixed constructions after 5 years of loading. The mean marginal bone loss was 2.3 ± 0.8 mm (range, 0–5.0 mm) in the Brånemark group and 2.4 ± 1.4 mm (range, 0–7.0 mm) in the Astra Tech group, although again no statistical difference was found. A larger number of implants in the Astra Tech group had a marginal bone resorption of ≥ 3 mm, and implant success in that group was lower than in the Brånemark group (52% vs 70%).</p>
Conclusion:
<p>In this study, reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with Le Fort I osteotomy, interpositional bone grafting, and delayed placement of dental implants was found to be a predictable long‐term procedure. Although more implants with a turned surface were lost during the follow‐up period, there were no statistically significant differences between turned and titanium blasted implants.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">comparative study</term><term xml:id="k2">dental implant surface</term><term xml:id="k3">fibrin glue</term><term xml:id="k4">interpositional bone grafting</term><term xml:id="k5">Le Fort I osteotomy</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/583BC9AD44A0946166F2EC9035224D891173383E/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="07003"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.2005.7.issue-3</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="7">7</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="3">3</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2005-07">July 2005</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0012100" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00055.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID121"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="6"></count></countGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2006-08-10"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2006-08-10"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-04"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-17"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="121">121</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="126">126</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Reprint requests: Dr Mats Hallman, Clinic for Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Public Health Service, Gävle Hospital, SE 80187 Gävle, Sweden; e‐mail: <email>mats.hallman@lg.se</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID121.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="14"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="4"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">A Retrospective 5‐Year Follow‐Up Study of Two Different Titanium Implant Surfaces Used after Interpositional Bone Grafting for Reconstruction of the Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Mats</givenNames><familyName>Hallman</familyName><degrees>DDS, PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Arne</givenNames><familyName>Mordenfeld</familyName><degrees>DDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Tomas</givenNames><familyName>Strandkvist</familyName><degrees>DDS</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Public Health Service, Gävle City, Sweden; Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University, County Council of Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">comparative study</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">dental implant surface</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">fibrin glue</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">interpositional bone grafting</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">Le Fort I osteotomy</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><section xml:id="abs1-1"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title></section><section xml:id="abs1-2"><title type="main">Background:</title><p>Long‐term comparative follow‐up studies of dental implants placed in augmented bone are rare. Variations in design and surface roughness have been found to be important for bone integration of implants. However, there is no clinical evidence that such variations lead to an improved clinical outcome.</p></section><section xml:id="abs1-3"><title type="main">Purpose:</title><p>To compare two different implant systems used after interpositional bone grafting of the severely resorbed maxilla with a modified augmentation technique using fibrin glue.</p></section><section xml:id="abs1-4"><title type="main">Materials and Methods:</title><p>Twenty‐two consecutive patients presenting with severe maxillary atrophy underwent reconstruction with Le Fort I osteotomies and interpositional bone grafting. Before placement of bone blocks, the floors of the maxillary sinuses were packed with bone chips mixed with a fibrin glue, to stabilize the graft. After 6 months of graft healing, the first 11 consecutive patients received Brånemark System® implants with a turned surface (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden). The following 11 consecutive patients were treated with Astra Tech implants with a blasted titanium surface (Astra Tech AB, Molndal, Sweden). All patients received fixed prostheses. Marginal bone resorption and donor and recipient site morbidity were evaluated. All patients were clinically and radiographically observed throughout 5 years of functional loading.</p></section><section xml:id="abs1-5"><title type="main">Results:</title><p>In the Brånemark group, 11 (13%) of 84 placed implants were lost, compared to 4 (5.5%) of 72 placed implants in the Astra Tech group. The difference was not significant. All patients retained fixed constructions after 5 years of loading. The mean marginal bone loss was 2.3 ± 0.8 mm (range, 0–5.0 mm) in the Brånemark group and 2.4 ± 1.4 mm (range, 0–7.0 mm) in the Astra Tech group, although again no statistical difference was found. A larger number of implants in the Astra Tech group had a marginal bone resorption of ≥ 3 mm, and implant success in that group was lower than in the Brånemark group (52% vs 70%).</p></section><section xml:id="abs1-6"><title type="main">Conclusion:</title><p>In this study, reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with Le Fort I osteotomy, interpositional bone grafting, and delayed placement of dental implants was found to be a predictable long‐term procedure. Although more implants with a turned surface were lost during the follow‐up period, there were no statistically significant differences between turned and titanium blasted implants.</p></section></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>A Retrospective 5‐Year Follow‐Up Study of Two Different Titanium Implant Surfaces Used after Interpositional Bone Grafting for Reconstruction of the Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>A Retrospective 5‐Year Follow‐Up Study of Two Different Titanium Implant Surfaces Used after Interpositional Bone Grafting for Reconstruction of the Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Mats</namePart><namePart type="family">Hallman</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Public Health Service, Gävle City, Sweden; Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University, County Council of Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: mats.hallman@lg.se</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Arne</namePart><namePart type="family">Mordenfeld</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Public Health Service, Gävle City, Sweden; Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University, County Council of Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Tomas</namePart><namePart type="family">Strandkvist</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Public Health Service, Gävle City, Sweden; Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University, County Council of Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2005-07</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2005</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="references">14</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">4</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>ABSTRACT</abstract><abstract>Long‐term comparative follow‐up studies of dental implants placed in augmented bone are rare. Variations in design and surface roughness have been found to be important for bone integration of implants. However, there is no clinical evidence that such variations lead to an improved clinical outcome.</abstract><abstract>To compare two different implant systems used after interpositional bone grafting of the severely resorbed maxilla with a modified augmentation technique using fibrin glue.</abstract><abstract>Twenty‐two consecutive patients presenting with severe maxillary atrophy underwent reconstruction with Le Fort I osteotomies and interpositional bone grafting. Before placement of bone blocks, the floors of the maxillary sinuses were packed with bone chips mixed with a fibrin glue, to stabilize the graft. After 6 months of graft healing, the first 11 consecutive patients received Brånemark System® implants with a turned surface (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden). The following 11 consecutive patients were treated with Astra Tech implants with a blasted titanium surface (Astra Tech AB, Molndal, Sweden). All patients received fixed prostheses. Marginal bone resorption and donor and recipient site morbidity were evaluated. All patients were clinically and radiographically observed throughout 5 years of functional loading.</abstract><abstract>In the Brånemark group, 11 (13%) of 84 placed implants were lost, compared to 4 (5.5%) of 72 placed implants in the Astra Tech group. The difference was not significant. All patients retained fixed constructions after 5 years of loading. The mean marginal bone loss was 2.3 ± 0.8 mm (range, 0–5.0 mm) in the Brånemark group and 2.4 ± 1.4 mm (range, 0–7.0 mm) in the Astra Tech group, although again no statistical difference was found. A larger number of implants in the Astra Tech group had a marginal bone resorption of ≥ 3 mm, and implant success in that group was lower than in the Brånemark group (52% vs 70%).</abstract><abstract>In this study, reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with Le Fort I osteotomy, interpositional bone grafting, and delayed placement of dental implants was found to be a predictable long‐term procedure. Although more implants with a turned surface were lost during the follow‐up period, there were no statistically significant differences between turned and titanium blasted implants.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>comparative study</topic><topic>dental implant surface</topic><topic>fibrin glue</topic><topic>interpositional bone grafting</topic><topic>Le Fort I osteotomy</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2005</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>7</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>121</start><end>126</end><total>6</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">583BC9AD44A0946166F2EC9035224D891173383E</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-6S8N1Z7P-X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00055.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID121</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/583BC9AD44A0946166F2EC9035224D891173383E/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002B43 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002B43 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:583BC9AD44A0946166F2EC9035224D891173383E
|texte= A Retrospective 5‐Year Follow‐Up Study of Two Different Titanium Implant Surfaces Used after Interpositional Bone Grafting for Reconstruction of the Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |