Influence of Prosthesis Material on the Loading of Implants That Support a Fixed Partial Prosthesis: In Vivo Study
Identifieur interne : 002B33 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002B32; suivant : 002B34Influence of Prosthesis Material on the Loading of Implants That Support a Fixed Partial Prosthesis: In Vivo Study
Auteurs : Joke Duyck ; Hans Van Oostenvyck ; Jos Vander Sloten ; Michel De Cooman ; Robert Puers ; Ignace NaertSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2000-04.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Acrylic resin, Acrylic resin prostheses, Acrylic resin prosthesis, Axial, Axial forces, Better distribution, Clenching, Clinical implant dentistry, Different positions, Distal implant, Distal implants, Edentulous patients, First quadrant, Full prosthesis, Higher loads, Implant, Load application, Load distribution, Maxillofac, Maximal occlusion, Mesial, Mesial implant, Metal prostheses, Middle implant, Middle implants, Occlusal, Occlusal surface, Oral implants, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated, Partial edentulism, Partial prostheses, Partial prosthesis, Prosthesis, Prosthesis material, Prosthodont, Quadrant, Second quadrant, Significant differences, Significant effect, Standard error, Test groups.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Acrylic resin, Acrylic resin prostheses, Acrylic resin prosthesis, Axial, Axial forces, Better distribution, Clenching, Clinical implant dentistry, Different positions, Distal implant, Distal implants, Edentulous patients, First quadrant, Full prosthesis, Higher loads, Implant, Load application, Load distribution, Maxillofac, Maximal occlusion, Mesial, Mesial implant, Metal prostheses, Middle implant, Middle implants, Occlusal, Occlusal surface, Oral implants, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated, Partial edentulism, Partial prostheses, Partial prosthesis, Prosthesis, Prosthesis material, Prosthodont, Quadrant, Second quadrant, Significant differences, Significant effect, Standard error, Test groups.
Abstract
Background: Since loading is increasingly believed to be a determining factor in the treatment outcome with oral implants, there is a need to expand the knowledge related to the biomechanics of oral implants and its influencing factors. Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of prosthesis material on the distribution and magnitude of load on oral implants carrying a fixed partial prosthesis by in vivo quantification and qualification of this load. Methods: Eight patients with in total nine three‐unit fixed partial prostheses on three implants and three patients with in total four two‐unit fixed partial prostheses on two implants were selected. Both metal and acrylic resin prostheses were made. Strain gauged abutments were used to measure the load on the supporting implants during controlled load application of 50 N on several positions along the occlusal surface of the prostheses and during maximal biting in maximal occlusion. Additional tests were conducted when the three‐unit prostheses were supported only by two implants, thereby creating an extension pontic. Results: A significantly better distribution of bending moments with the metal prostheses in comparison to the acrylic resin prostheses was observed in the case of the three‐unit prostheses on two implants. No other difference in load or load distribution with the different prosthesis materials was noted. Conclusion: The clinical significance of the study reveals an increased risk for bending overload of the implants that are closest to the point of load application only in the case of acrylic resin long span prostheses or acrylic resin prostheses with extensions.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00112.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:580EFB629370F0463D672A7F1CBE8C7702A68724Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Influence of Prosthesis Material on the Loading of Implants That Support a Fixed Partial Prosthesis: In Vivo Study</title><author><name sortKey="Duyck, Joke" sort="Duyck, Joke" uniqKey="Duyck J" first="Joke" last="Duyck">Joke Duyck</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Oostenvyck, Hans" sort="Van Oostenvyck, Hans" uniqKey="Van Oostenvyck H" first="Hans" last="Van Oostenvyck">Hans Van Oostenvyck</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Mechanics, Division of Biomechanics and Engineering Design</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vander Sloten, Jos" sort="Vander Sloten, Jos" uniqKey="Vander Sloten J" first="Jos" last="Vander Sloten">Jos Vander Sloten</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Mechanics, Division of Biomechanics and Engineering Design</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Cooman, Michel" sort="De Cooman, Michel" uniqKey="De Cooman M" first="Michel" last="De Cooman">Michel De Cooman</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Electrotechnics—ESAT‐MICAS, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Puers, Robert" sort="Puers, Robert" uniqKey="Puers R" first="Robert" last="Puers">Robert Puers</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Electrotechnics—ESAT‐MICAS, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Naert, Ignace" sort="Naert, Ignace" uniqKey="Naert I" first="Ignace" last="Naert">Ignace Naert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence address: Reprint requests: Ignace Naert, DDS, PhD, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Catholic University Leuven, U.Z. St. Raphaël, Kapucijnenvoer 33, B‐3000 Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:580EFB629370F0463D672A7F1CBE8C7702A68724</idno><date when="2000" year="2000">2000</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00112.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/580EFB629370F0463D672A7F1CBE8C7702A68724/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002B33</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002B33</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Influence of Prosthesis Material on the Loading of Implants That Support a Fixed Partial Prosthesis: In Vivo Study</title><author><name sortKey="Duyck, Joke" sort="Duyck, Joke" uniqKey="Duyck J" first="Joke" last="Duyck">Joke Duyck</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Oostenvyck, Hans" sort="Van Oostenvyck, Hans" uniqKey="Van Oostenvyck H" first="Hans" last="Van Oostenvyck">Hans Van Oostenvyck</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Mechanics, Division of Biomechanics and Engineering Design</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vander Sloten, Jos" sort="Vander Sloten, Jos" uniqKey="Vander Sloten J" first="Jos" last="Vander Sloten">Jos Vander Sloten</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Mechanics, Division of Biomechanics and Engineering Design</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Cooman, Michel" sort="De Cooman, Michel" uniqKey="De Cooman M" first="Michel" last="De Cooman">Michel De Cooman</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Electrotechnics—ESAT‐MICAS, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Puers, Robert" sort="Puers, Robert" uniqKey="Puers R" first="Robert" last="Puers">Robert Puers</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Electrotechnics—ESAT‐MICAS, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Naert, Ignace" sort="Naert, Ignace" uniqKey="Naert I" first="Ignace" last="Naert">Ignace Naert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence address: Reprint requests: Ignace Naert, DDS, PhD, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Catholic University Leuven, U.Z. St. Raphaël, Kapucijnenvoer 33, B‐3000 Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="100">100</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="109">109</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-04">2000-04</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Acrylic resin</term><term>Acrylic resin prostheses</term><term>Acrylic resin prosthesis</term><term>Axial</term><term>Axial forces</term><term>Better distribution</term><term>Clenching</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Different positions</term><term>Distal implant</term><term>Distal implants</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>First quadrant</term><term>Full prosthesis</term><term>Higher loads</term><term>Implant</term><term>Load application</term><term>Load distribution</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Maximal occlusion</term><term>Mesial</term><term>Mesial implant</term><term>Metal prostheses</term><term>Middle implant</term><term>Middle implants</term><term>Occlusal</term><term>Occlusal surface</term><term>Oral implants</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Partial edentulism</term><term>Partial prostheses</term><term>Partial prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis material</term><term>Prosthodont</term><term>Quadrant</term><term>Second quadrant</term><term>Significant differences</term><term>Significant effect</term><term>Standard error</term><term>Test groups</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Acrylic resin</term><term>Acrylic resin prostheses</term><term>Acrylic resin prosthesis</term><term>Axial</term><term>Axial forces</term><term>Better distribution</term><term>Clenching</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Different positions</term><term>Distal implant</term><term>Distal implants</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>First quadrant</term><term>Full prosthesis</term><term>Higher loads</term><term>Implant</term><term>Load application</term><term>Load distribution</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Maximal occlusion</term><term>Mesial</term><term>Mesial implant</term><term>Metal prostheses</term><term>Middle implant</term><term>Middle implants</term><term>Occlusal</term><term>Occlusal surface</term><term>Oral implants</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Partial edentulism</term><term>Partial prostheses</term><term>Partial prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis material</term><term>Prosthodont</term><term>Quadrant</term><term>Second quadrant</term><term>Significant differences</term><term>Significant effect</term><term>Standard error</term><term>Test groups</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background: Since loading is increasingly believed to be a determining factor in the treatment outcome with oral implants, there is a need to expand the knowledge related to the biomechanics of oral implants and its influencing factors. Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of prosthesis material on the distribution and magnitude of load on oral implants carrying a fixed partial prosthesis by in vivo quantification and qualification of this load. Methods: Eight patients with in total nine three‐unit fixed partial prostheses on three implants and three patients with in total four two‐unit fixed partial prostheses on two implants were selected. Both metal and acrylic resin prostheses were made. Strain gauged abutments were used to measure the load on the supporting implants during controlled load application of 50 N on several positions along the occlusal surface of the prostheses and during maximal biting in maximal occlusion. Additional tests were conducted when the three‐unit prostheses were supported only by two implants, thereby creating an extension pontic. Results: A significantly better distribution of bending moments with the metal prostheses in comparison to the acrylic resin prostheses was observed in the case of the three‐unit prostheses on two implants. No other difference in load or load distribution with the different prosthesis materials was noted. Conclusion: The clinical significance of the study reveals an increased risk for bending overload of the implants that are closest to the point of load application only in the case of acrylic resin long span prostheses or acrylic resin prostheses with extensions.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>prosthesis material</json:string><json:string>occlusal</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>acrylic resin prostheses</json:string><json:string>maxillofac</json:string><json:string>load application</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>mesial</json:string><json:string>axial forces</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated</json:string><json:string>acrylic resin</json:string><json:string>full prosthesis</json:string><json:string>quadrant</json:string><json:string>clenching</json:string><json:string>prosthodont</json:string><json:string>metal prostheses</json:string><json:string>partial prostheses</json:string><json:string>oral implants</json:string><json:string>occlusal surface</json:string><json:string>acrylic resin prosthesis</json:string><json:string>maximal occlusion</json:string><json:string>distal implant</json:string><json:string>distal implants</json:string><json:string>middle implant</json:string><json:string>standard error</json:string><json:string>mesial implant</json:string><json:string>second quadrant</json:string><json:string>load distribution</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>partial edentulism</json:string><json:string>better distribution</json:string><json:string>first quadrant</json:string><json:string>axial</json:string><json:string>significant differences</json:string><json:string>middle implants</json:string><json:string>higher loads</json:string><json:string>significant effect</json:string><json:string>different positions</json:string><json:string>test groups</json:string><json:string>partial prosthesis</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Joke Duyck DDS, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Hans Van Oostenvyck MSc</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Mechanics, Division of Biomechanics and Engineering Design</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Jos Vander Sloten PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Mechanics, Division of Biomechanics and Engineering Design</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Michel De Cooman</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Electrotechnics—ESAT‐MICAS, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Robert Puers MSc, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Electrotechnics—ESAT‐MICAS, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Ignace Naert DDS, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group</json:string><json:string>Correspondence address: Reprint requests: Ignace Naert, DDS, PhD, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Catholic University Leuven, U.Z. St. Raphaël, Kapucijnenvoer 33, B‐3000 Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>biomechanics</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>fixed partial prosthesis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>in vivo research</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>oral implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>strain gauges</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID100</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-MF189R7V-4</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Background: Since loading is increasingly believed to be a determining factor in the treatment outcome with oral implants, there is a need to expand the knowledge related to the biomechanics of oral implants and its influencing factors. Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of prosthesis material on the distribution and magnitude of load on oral implants carrying a fixed partial prosthesis by in vivo quantification and qualification of this load. Methods: Eight patients with in total nine three‐unit fixed partial prostheses on three implants and three patients with in total four two‐unit fixed partial prostheses on two implants were selected. Both metal and acrylic resin prostheses were made. Strain gauged abutments were used to measure the load on the supporting implants during controlled load application of 50 N on several positions along the occlusal surface of the prostheses and during maximal biting in maximal occlusion. Additional tests were conducted when the three‐unit prostheses were supported only by two implants, thereby creating an extension pontic. Results: A significantly better distribution of bending moments with the metal prostheses in comparison to the acrylic resin prostheses was observed in the case of the three‐unit prostheses on two implants. No other difference in load or load distribution with the different prosthesis materials was noted. Conclusion: The clinical significance of the study reveals an increased risk for bending overload of the implants that are closest to the point of load application only in the case of acrylic resin long span prostheses or acrylic resin prostheses with extensions.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>9.681</score><pdfWordCount>4681</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>28504</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>576 x 792 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>257</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1674</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Influence of Prosthesis Material on the Loading of Implants That Support a Fixed Partial Prosthesis: In Vivo Study</title><pmid><json:string>11359263</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>100</first><last>109</last><total>10</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2000</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Research Group</json:string><json:string>Research Council K</json:string><json:string>Department of Mechanics, Division of Biomechanics and Engineering</json:string><json:string>SAS Institute Inc</json:string><json:string>Department of Electrotechnics</json:string><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>Tokyo Sokki Kenkyujo Co.</json:string><json:string>Belgium Reprint</json:string><json:string>Catholic University</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Catholic University Leuven</json:string><json:string>Scientific Research, Flanders</json:string><json:string>Decker Inc.</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Michel De Cooman</json:string><json:string>Robert Puers</json:string><json:string>O To</json:string><json:string>Vander Sloten</json:string><json:string>Ignace Naert</json:string><json:string>U.Z. St. Raphael</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Leuven</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Belgium</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Gunne et al</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-MF189R7V-4</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2000</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2000</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00112.x</json:string></doi><id>580EFB629370F0463D672A7F1CBE8C7702A68724</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/580EFB629370F0463D672A7F1CBE8C7702A68724/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/580EFB629370F0463D672A7F1CBE8C7702A68724/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/580EFB629370F0463D672A7F1CBE8C7702A68724/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Influence of Prosthesis Material on the Loading of Implants That Support a Fixed Partial Prosthesis: In Vivo Study</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-04"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Influence of Prosthesis Material on the Loading of Implants That Support a Fixed Partial Prosthesis: In Vivo Study</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Joke</forename><surname>Duyck</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Hans</forename><surname>Oostenvyck</surname><roleName type="degree">MSc</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Mechanics, Division of Biomechanics and Engineering Design</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Jos</forename><surname>Sloten</surname><roleName type="degree">PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Mechanics, Division of Biomechanics and Engineering Design</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Michel</forename><surname>Cooman</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Electrotechnics—ESAT‐MICAS, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Robert</forename><surname>Puers</surname><roleName type="degree">MSc, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Electrotechnics—ESAT‐MICAS, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0005" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Ignace</forename><surname>Naert</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group</affiliation><affiliation>Reprint requests: Ignace Naert, DDS, PhD, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Catholic University Leuven, U.Z. St. Raphaël, Kapucijnenvoer 33, B‐3000 Leuven, Belgium</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">580EFB629370F0463D672A7F1CBE8C7702A68724</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-MF189R7V-4</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00112.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID100</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID100.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2000.2.issue-2</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="100">100</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="109">109</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-04"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p>
<hi rend="italic">Background</hi>: Since loading is increasingly believed to be a determining factor in the treatment outcome with oral implants, there is a need to expand the knowledge related to the biomechanics of oral implants and its influencing factors.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Purpose</hi>: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of prosthesis material on the distribution and magnitude of load on oral implants carrying a fixed partial prosthesis by in vivo quantification and qualification of this load.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Methods</hi>: Eight patients with in total nine three‐unit fixed partial prostheses on three implants and three patients with in total four two‐unit fixed partial prostheses on two implants were selected. Both metal and acrylic resin prostheses were made. Strain gauged abutments were used to measure the load on the supporting implants during controlled load application of 50 N on several positions along the occlusal surface of the prostheses and during maximal biting in maximal occlusion. Additional tests were conducted when the three‐unit prostheses were supported only by two implants, thereby creating an extension pontic.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Results</hi>: A significantly better distribution of bending moments with the metal prostheses in comparison to the acrylic resin prostheses was observed in the case of the three‐unit prostheses on two implants. No other difference in load or load distribution with the different prosthesis materials was noted.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Conclusion</hi>: The clinical significance of the study reveals an increased risk for bending overload of the implants that are closest to the point of load application only in the case of acrylic resin long span prostheses or acrylic resin prostheses with extensions.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">biomechanics</term><term xml:id="k2">fixed partial prosthesis</term><term xml:id="k3">in vivo research</term><term xml:id="k4">oral implants</term><term xml:id="k5">strain gauges</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/580EFB629370F0463D672A7F1CBE8C7702A68724/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="04002"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.2000.2.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="2">2</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2000-04">April 2000</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0010000" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00112.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID100"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="10"></count></countGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2007-04-10"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-04-10"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.5 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-04-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="100">100</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="109">109</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Reprint requests: Ignace Naert, DDS, PhD, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Catholic University Leuven, U.Z. St. Raphaël, Kapucijnenvoer 33, B‐3000 Leuven, Belgium</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID100.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="42"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="7"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Influence of Prosthesis Material on the Loading of Implants That Support a Fixed Partial Prosthesis: In Vivo Study</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Joke</givenNames><familyName>Duyck</familyName><degrees>DDS, PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Hans</givenNames><familyNamePrefix>Van</familyNamePrefix><familyName>Oostenvyck</familyName><degrees>MSc</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Jos</givenNames><familyNamePrefix>Vander</familyNamePrefix><familyName>Sloten</familyName><degrees>PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Michel</givenNames><familyNamePrefix>De</familyNamePrefix><familyName>Cooman</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Robert</givenNames><familyName>Puers</familyName><degrees>MSc, PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr6" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Ignace</givenNames><familyName>Naert</familyName><degrees>DDS, PhD</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Mechanics, Division of Biomechanics and Engineering Design</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Electrotechnics—ESAT‐MICAS, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">biomechanics</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">fixed partial prosthesis</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">in vivo research</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">oral implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">strain gauges</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p> <i>Background</i>: Since loading is increasingly believed to be a determining factor in the treatment outcome with oral implants, there is a need to expand the knowledge related to the biomechanics of oral implants and its influencing factors.</p><p> <i>Purpose</i>: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of prosthesis material on the distribution and magnitude of load on oral implants carrying a fixed partial prosthesis by in vivo quantification and qualification of this load.</p><p> <i>Methods</i>: Eight patients with in total nine three‐unit fixed partial prostheses on three implants and three patients with in total four two‐unit fixed partial prostheses on two implants were selected. Both metal and acrylic resin prostheses were made. Strain gauged abutments were used to measure the load on the supporting implants during controlled load application of 50 N on several positions along the occlusal surface of the prostheses and during maximal biting in maximal occlusion. Additional tests were conducted when the three‐unit prostheses were supported only by two implants, thereby creating an extension pontic.</p><p> <i>Results</i>: A significantly better distribution of bending moments with the metal prostheses in comparison to the acrylic resin prostheses was observed in the case of the three‐unit prostheses on two implants. No other difference in load or load distribution with the different prosthesis materials was noted.</p><p> <i>Conclusion</i>: The clinical significance of the study reveals an increased risk for bending overload of the implants that are closest to the point of load application only in the case of acrylic resin long span prostheses or acrylic resin prostheses with extensions.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note xml:id="n-fnt-1" numbered="no"><p>This study was funded by a grant from the Research Fund of Research Council K.U. Leuven (no.: OT95/27) and the Fund for Scientific Research, Flanders (no. G.0180.96). The authors would like to thank Kris Bogaerts (Biostatistical Centre, K.U. Leuven) for the statistical analyses.</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Influence of Prosthesis Material on the Loading of Implants That Support a Fixed Partial Prosthesis: In Vivo Study</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Influence of Prosthesis Material on the Loading of Implants That Support a Fixed Partial Prosthesis: In Vivo Study</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Joke</namePart><namePart type="family">Duyck</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Hans</namePart><namePart type="family">Van Oostenvyck</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">MSc</namePart><affiliation>Department of Mechanics, Division of Biomechanics and Engineering Design</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Jos</namePart><namePart type="family">Vander Sloten</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">PhD</namePart><affiliation>Department of Mechanics, Division of Biomechanics and Engineering Design</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Michel</namePart><namePart type="family">De Cooman</namePart><affiliation>Department of Electrotechnics—ESAT‐MICAS, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Robert</namePart><namePart type="family">Puers</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">MSc, PhD</namePart><affiliation>Department of Electrotechnics—ESAT‐MICAS, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Ignace</namePart><namePart type="family">Naert</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group</affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence address: Reprint requests: Ignace Naert, DDS, PhD, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Catholic University Leuven, U.Z. St. Raphaël, Kapucijnenvoer 33, B‐3000 Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-04</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2000</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="references">42</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">7</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Background: Since loading is increasingly believed to be a determining factor in the treatment outcome with oral implants, there is a need to expand the knowledge related to the biomechanics of oral implants and its influencing factors. Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of prosthesis material on the distribution and magnitude of load on oral implants carrying a fixed partial prosthesis by in vivo quantification and qualification of this load. Methods: Eight patients with in total nine three‐unit fixed partial prostheses on three implants and three patients with in total four two‐unit fixed partial prostheses on two implants were selected. Both metal and acrylic resin prostheses were made. Strain gauged abutments were used to measure the load on the supporting implants during controlled load application of 50 N on several positions along the occlusal surface of the prostheses and during maximal biting in maximal occlusion. Additional tests were conducted when the three‐unit prostheses were supported only by two implants, thereby creating an extension pontic. Results: A significantly better distribution of bending moments with the metal prostheses in comparison to the acrylic resin prostheses was observed in the case of the three‐unit prostheses on two implants. No other difference in load or load distribution with the different prosthesis materials was noted. Conclusion: The clinical significance of the study reveals an increased risk for bending overload of the implants that are closest to the point of load application only in the case of acrylic resin long span prostheses or acrylic resin prostheses with extensions.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>biomechanics</topic><topic>fixed partial prosthesis</topic><topic>in vivo research</topic><topic>oral implants</topic><topic>strain gauges</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2000</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>2</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>100</start><end>109</end><total>10</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">580EFB629370F0463D672A7F1CBE8C7702A68724</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-MF189R7V-4</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00112.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID100</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/580EFB629370F0463D672A7F1CBE8C7702A68724/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002B33 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002B33 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:580EFB629370F0463D672A7F1CBE8C7702A68724
|texte= Influence of Prosthesis Material on the Loading of Implants That Support a Fixed Partial Prosthesis: In Vivo Study
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |