A prospective clinical trial of single Astra Tech 4.0 or 5.0 diameter implants used to support two‐unit cantilever bridges: results after 3 years
Identifieur interne : 002A49 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002A48; suivant : 002A50A prospective clinical trial of single Astra Tech 4.0 or 5.0 diameter implants used to support two‐unit cantilever bridges: results after 3 years
Auteurs : Richard M. Palmer ; Leslie C. Howe ; Paul J. Palmer ; Ron WilsonSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2012-01.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment screw, Aglietta, Astra, Astra tech, Baseline, Bone level changes, Bone levels, Bone loss, Cantilever, Cantilever extension, Cantilever extensions, Cantilever fdps, Cantilever unit, Cantilever width, Complication, Dental implants, Dental prosthesis, Edentulous space, Fdps, Fracture, Gger, Implant, Implant failure, Implant fracture, Implants research, International journal, John wiley sons, Mechanical complications, Median, Median range, More bone loss, Natural teeth, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Partial dentures, Present study, Previous studies, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Radiograph, Single implant, Single implants, Systematic review, Time point.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment screw, Aglietta, Astra, Astra tech, Baseline, Bone level changes, Bone levels, Bone loss, Cantilever, Cantilever extension, Cantilever extensions, Cantilever fdps, Cantilever unit, Cantilever width, Complication, Dental implants, Dental prosthesis, Edentulous space, Fdps, Fracture, Gger, Implant, Implant failure, Implant fracture, Implants research, International journal, John wiley sons, Mechanical complications, Median, Median range, More bone loss, Natural teeth, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Partial dentures, Present study, Previous studies, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Radiograph, Single implant, Single implants, Systematic review, Time point.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the use of a single Astra Tech implant to support a two‐unit cantilever fixed dental prosthesis.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02160.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:5645547CEC50590B9C777572E6108D6B11CDD8DCLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A prospective clinical trial of single Astra Tech 4.0 or 5.0 diameter implants used to support two‐unit cantilever bridges: results after 3 years</title><author><name sortKey="Palmer, Richard M" sort="Palmer, Richard M" uniqKey="Palmer R" first="Richard M." last="Palmer">Richard M. Palmer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute, London, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Howe, Leslie C" sort="Howe, Leslie C" uniqKey="Howe L" first="Leslie C." last="Howe">Leslie C. Howe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute, London, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Palmer, Paul J" sort="Palmer, Paul J" uniqKey="Palmer P" first="Paul J." last="Palmer">Paul J. Palmer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute, London, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wilson, Ron" sort="Wilson, Ron" uniqKey="Wilson R" first="Ron" last="Wilson">Ron Wilson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute, London, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:5645547CEC50590B9C777572E6108D6B11CDD8DC</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02160.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/5645547CEC50590B9C777572E6108D6B11CDD8DC/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002A49</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002A49</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A prospective clinical trial of single Astra Tech 4.0 or 5.0 diameter implants used to support two‐unit cantilever bridges: results after 3 years</title><author><name sortKey="Palmer, Richard M" sort="Palmer, Richard M" uniqKey="Palmer R" first="Richard M." last="Palmer">Richard M. Palmer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute, London, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Howe, Leslie C" sort="Howe, Leslie C" uniqKey="Howe L" first="Leslie C." last="Howe">Leslie C. Howe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute, London, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Palmer, Paul J" sort="Palmer, Paul J" uniqKey="Palmer P" first="Paul J." last="Palmer">Paul J. Palmer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute, London, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wilson, Ron" sort="Wilson, Ron" uniqKey="Wilson R" first="Ron" last="Wilson">Ron Wilson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute, London, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="35">35</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="40">40</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-01">2012-01</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment screw</term><term>Aglietta</term><term>Astra</term><term>Astra tech</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Bone level changes</term><term>Bone levels</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Cantilever</term><term>Cantilever extension</term><term>Cantilever extensions</term><term>Cantilever fdps</term><term>Cantilever unit</term><term>Cantilever width</term><term>Complication</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental prosthesis</term><term>Edentulous space</term><term>Fdps</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Gger</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant fracture</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Mechanical complications</term><term>Median</term><term>Median range</term><term>More bone loss</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Present study</term><term>Previous studies</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Single implant</term><term>Single implants</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Time point</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment screw</term><term>Aglietta</term><term>Astra</term><term>Astra tech</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Bone level changes</term><term>Bone levels</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Cantilever</term><term>Cantilever extension</term><term>Cantilever extensions</term><term>Cantilever fdps</term><term>Cantilever unit</term><term>Cantilever width</term><term>Complication</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental prosthesis</term><term>Edentulous space</term><term>Fdps</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Gger</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant fracture</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Mechanical complications</term><term>Median</term><term>Median range</term><term>More bone loss</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Present study</term><term>Previous studies</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Single implant</term><term>Single implants</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Time point</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Objective: To evaluate the use of a single Astra Tech implant to support a two‐unit cantilever fixed dental prosthesis.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>cantilever</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>fdps</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>astra</json:string><json:string>aglietta</json:string><json:string>gger</json:string><json:string>radiograph</json:string><json:string>abutment screw</json:string><json:string>bone levels</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>mechanical complications</json:string><json:string>cantilever extension</json:string><json:string>time point</json:string><json:string>partial dentures</json:string><json:string>more bone loss</json:string><json:string>systematic review</json:string><json:string>median</json:string><json:string>baseline</json:string><json:string>cantilever extensions</json:string><json:string>dental prosthesis</json:string><json:string>astra tech</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>previous studies</json:string><json:string>cantilever fdps</json:string><json:string>complication</json:string><json:string>fracture</json:string><json:string>implant fracture</json:string><json:string>implant failure</json:string><json:string>cantilever width</json:string><json:string>single implant</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>median range</json:string><json:string>bone level changes</json:string><json:string>cantilever unit</json:string><json:string>single implants</json:string><json:string>natural teeth</json:string><json:string>edentulous space</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Richard M. Palmer</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Restorative Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute, London, UK</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Leslie C. Howe</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Restorative Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute, London, UK</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Paul J. Palmer</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Restorative Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute, London, UK</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Ron Wilson</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Restorative Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute, London, UK</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Astra Tech</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>cantilever</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>fixed dental prosthesis</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR2160</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-G2NSJ4XF-2</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Objective: To evaluate the use of a single Astra Tech implant to support a two‐unit cantilever fixed dental prosthesis.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.128</score><pdfWordCount>3900</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>24533</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>6</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>19</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>119</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>A prospective clinical trial of single Astra Tech 4.0 or 5.0 diameter implants used to support two‐unit cantilever bridges: results after 3 years</title><pmid><json:string>21443587</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>35</first><last>40</last><total>6</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2011</json:string><json:string>2012</json:string><json:string>2</json:string><json:string>3</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>College London Dental Institute Department of Restorative Dentistry Floor</json:string><json:string>Guy’s Hospital Campus London SE</json:string><json:string>The International Journal</json:string><json:string>College London Dental Institute, London, UK A</json:string><json:string>RT UK Tel</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Richard M. Palmer</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Paul J. Palmer</json:string><json:string>Leslie C. Howe</json:string><json:string>Ron Wilson</json:string><json:string>Recent</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Blanes</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Palmer et al</json:string><json:string>Aglietta et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Romeo et al. 2003, 2004</json:string><json:string>Wiskott et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Nedir 2006</json:string><json:string>Ha et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Blanes et al. (2007)</json:string><json:string>Kreissl et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Aglietta et al. (2009)</json:string><json:string>Palmer et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Zurdo et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Wennstrom et al. (2004)</json:string><json:string>Shackleton et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Ha et al. (2008)</json:string><json:string>Wennstrom et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Romeo et al. (2003, 2009)</json:string><json:string>Eliasson et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Rangert et al. 1995</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-G2NSJ4XF-2</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02160.x</json:string></doi><id>5645547CEC50590B9C777572E6108D6B11CDD8DC</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5645547CEC50590B9C777572E6108D6B11CDD8DC/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5645547CEC50590B9C777572E6108D6B11CDD8DC/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/5645547CEC50590B9C777572E6108D6B11CDD8DC/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">A prospective clinical trial of single Astra Tech 4.0 or 5.0 diameter implants used to support two‐unit cantilever bridges: results after 3 years</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2012-01"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A prospective clinical trial of single Astra Tech 4.0 or 5.0 diameter implants used to support two‐unit cantilever bridges: results after 3 years</title><title level="a" type="short">Astra Tech cantilever bridges</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Richard M.</forename><surname>Palmer</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute, London, UK<address><country key="GB"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Leslie C.</forename><surname>Howe</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute, London, UK<address><country key="GB"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Paul J.</forename><surname>Palmer</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute, London, UK<address><country key="GB"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Ron</forename><surname>Wilson</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute, London, UK<address><country key="GB"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">5645547CEC50590B9C777572E6108D6B11CDD8DC</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-G2NSJ4XF-2</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02160.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR2160</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR2160.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2011.23.issue-1</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="35">35</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="40">40</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-01"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p><hi rend="bold">Objective: </hi> To evaluate the use of a single Astra Tech implant to support a two‐unit cantilever fixed dental prosthesis.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and method: </hi> Twenty‐nine subjects with an edentulous space (at least equivalent to two bicuspid units) in the premolar/molar segments of the maxilla or mandible with opposing natural teeth or a fixed/removable prosthesis were treated. They were provided with either a 4 or 5.0 mm diameter fixture MT OsseoSpeed. Prostheses were constructed using a cast‐to abutment as a one‐piece unit with porcelain fused to precious metal to allow direct screw retention.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi> Subjects expressed a high satisfaction with treatment, including appearance and function. The most important complication was abutment screw loosening. It occurred as a single episode in four subjects and in another six subjects the loosening was recurrent. Bone levels were stable and there were no significant differences in radiographic bone height between cantilever and non‐cantilever sides of the implant at any time point.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion: </hi> Single implants can be successfully used to support two‐unit cantilever FDPs in the premolar region. A common factor could not be identified in relation to abutment screw loosening.</p><p><hi rend="bold">To cite this article:</hi>
Palmer RM, Howe LC, Palmer PJ, Wilson R. A prospective clinical trial of single Astra Tech 4.0 or 5.0 diameter implants used to support two‐unit cantilever bridges: results after 3 years.
<hi rend="italic">Clin. Oral Impl. Res</hi>. <hi rend="bold">23</hi>, 2012; 35–40.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02160.x</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">Astra Tech</term><term xml:id="k2">cantilever</term><term xml:id="k3">dental implants</term><term xml:id="k4">fixed dental prosthesis</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5645547CEC50590B9C777572E6108D6B11CDD8DC/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="01101"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2011.23.issue-1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="23">23</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-01">January 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="6" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02160.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR2160"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="6"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.9.1 mode:FullText" date="2011-12-15"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2011-12-15" type="xmlCorrected"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2011-03-28"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-03-28"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2011-12-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="35">35</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="40">40</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><b>Corresponding author:</b>
<i>Richard M. Palmer</i>
King's College London Dental Institute
Department of Restorative Dentistry
Floor 25, Tower Wing, Guy's Hospital Campus
London SE1 9RT
UK
Tel.: +44 207 188 4940
Fax: +44 207 188 1583
e‐mail: <email normalForm="richard.m.palmer@kcl.ac.uk">richard.m.palmer@kcl.ac.uk</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR2160.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Date:</b>, Accepted 18 December 2010</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="3"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="5"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="17"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="4650"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="38"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">A prospective clinical trial of single Astra Tech 4.0 or 5.0 diameter implants used to support two‐unit cantilever bridges: results after 3 years</title><title type="shortAuthors">Palmer et al.</title><title type="short">Astra Tech cantilever bridges</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Richard M.</givenNames><familyName>Palmer</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Leslie C.</givenNames><familyName>Howe</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Paul J.</givenNames><familyName>Palmer</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Ron</givenNames><familyName>Wilson</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="GB"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute, London, UK</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">Astra Tech</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">cantilever</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">dental implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">fixed dental prosthesis</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p><b>Objective: </b> To evaluate the use of a single Astra Tech implant to support a two‐unit cantilever fixed dental prosthesis.</p><p><b>Materials and method: </b> Twenty‐nine subjects with an edentulous space (at least equivalent to two bicuspid units) in the premolar/molar segments of the maxilla or mandible with opposing natural teeth or a fixed/removable prosthesis were treated. They were provided with either a 4 or 5.0 mm diameter fixture MT OsseoSpeed. Prostheses were constructed using a cast‐to abutment as a one‐piece unit with porcelain fused to precious metal to allow direct screw retention.</p><p><b>Results: </b> Subjects expressed a high satisfaction with treatment, including appearance and function. The most important complication was abutment screw loosening. It occurred as a single episode in four subjects and in another six subjects the loosening was recurrent. Bone levels were stable and there were no significant differences in radiographic bone height between cantilever and non‐cantilever sides of the implant at any time point.</p><p><b>Conclusion: </b> Single implants can be successfully used to support two‐unit cantilever FDPs in the premolar region. A common factor could not be identified in relation to abutment screw loosening.</p><p><b>To cite this article:</b>
Palmer RM, Howe LC, Palmer PJ, Wilson R. A prospective clinical trial of single Astra Tech 4.0 or 5.0 diameter implants used to support two‐unit cantilever bridges: results after 3 years.
<i>Clin. Oral Impl. Res</i>. <b>23</b>, 2012; 35–40.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02160.x</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>A prospective clinical trial of single Astra Tech 4.0 or 5.0 diameter implants used to support two‐unit cantilever bridges: results after 3 years</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Astra Tech cantilever bridges</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>A prospective clinical trial of single Astra Tech 4.0 or 5.0 diameter implants used to support two‐unit cantilever bridges: results after 3 years</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Richard M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Palmer</namePart><affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute, London, UK</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Leslie C.</namePart><namePart type="family">Howe</namePart><affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute, London, UK</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Paul J.</namePart><namePart type="family">Palmer</namePart><affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute, London, UK</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Ron</namePart><namePart type="family">Wilson</namePart><affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute, London, UK</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-01</dateIssued><edition>Date:, Accepted 18 December 2010</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">3</extent><extent unit="tables">5</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">17</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">38</extent><extent unit="words">4650</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Objective: To evaluate the use of a single Astra Tech implant to support a two‐unit cantilever fixed dental prosthesis.</abstract><abstract>Materials and method: Twenty‐nine subjects with an edentulous space (at least equivalent to two bicuspid units) in the premolar/molar segments of the maxilla or mandible with opposing natural teeth or a fixed/removable prosthesis were treated. They were provided with either a 4 or 5.0 mm diameter fixture MT OsseoSpeed. Prostheses were constructed using a cast‐to abutment as a one‐piece unit with porcelain fused to precious metal to allow direct screw retention.</abstract><abstract>Results: Subjects expressed a high satisfaction with treatment, including appearance and function. The most important complication was abutment screw loosening. It occurred as a single episode in four subjects and in another six subjects the loosening was recurrent. Bone levels were stable and there were no significant differences in radiographic bone height between cantilever and non‐cantilever sides of the implant at any time point.</abstract><abstract>Conclusion: Single implants can be successfully used to support two‐unit cantilever FDPs in the premolar region. A common factor could not be identified in relation to abutment screw loosening.</abstract><abstract>To cite this article:
Palmer RM, Howe LC, Palmer PJ, Wilson R. A prospective clinical trial of single Astra Tech 4.0 or 5.0 diameter implants used to support two‐unit cantilever bridges: results after 3 years.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23, 2012; 35–40.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02160.x</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>Astra Tech</topic><topic>cantilever</topic><topic>dental implants</topic><topic>fixed dental prosthesis</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>23</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>35</start><end>40</end><total>6</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">5645547CEC50590B9C777572E6108D6B11CDD8DC</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-G2NSJ4XF-2</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02160.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR2160</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5645547CEC50590B9C777572E6108D6B11CDD8DC/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002A49 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002A49 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:5645547CEC50590B9C777572E6108D6B11CDD8DC
|texte= A prospective clinical trial of single Astra Tech 4.0 or 5.0 diameter implants used to support two‐unit cantilever bridges: results after 3 years
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |