A comparison of methods of aesthetic assessment in root coverage procedures
Identifieur interne : 002967 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002966; suivant : 002968A comparison of methods of aesthetic assessment in root coverage procedures
Auteurs : Stéphane Kerner ; Sandrine Katsahian ; Alexandre Sarfati ; Stéphane Korngold ; Sébastien Jakmakjian ; Bruno Tavernier ; Fabien Valet ; Philippe BouchardSource :
- Journal of Clinical Periodontology [ 0303-6979 ] ; 2009-01.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Aesthetic appearance, Aesthetic assessment, Aesthetic outcome, Aesthetic outcomes, Aesthetic results, Assessment method, Augmentation, Authors journal compilation, Best interrater agreement, Bouchard, Clin periodontol, Clinical periodontology, Clinical trials, Coincident patients, Coincident recessions, Comparative study, Complete root coverage, Cosmetic, Cosmetic assessment, Cosmetic outcome, Cosmetic results, Denis diderot university, Different methods, Different types, Edentulous area, Envelope techniques, Fair degree, Future trials, Gingival, Gingival augmentation, Gingival recession, Global assessment, Graft, Image analysis system, Important outcome, International journal, Interobserver agreement, Interrater, Interrater agreement, Intraobserver, Intraobserver agreement, Intrarater, Intrarater agreement, John wiley sons, John wiley sons assessment method, Kerner, Limited training, Observer agreement, Ordinal, Ordinal scale, Patient judgement, Patient satisfaction, Periodontal plastic surgery, Periodontist, Periodontology, Photographic assessment, Postoperative, Postoperative assessment, Postoperative views, Preoperative, Present study, Professional assessment, Professional observers, Prosthodontist, Prosthodontist nurse, Qualitative panel, Random panel, Recession lack, Reliability, Retrospective study, Review panel, Root coverage, Root coverage percentage, Root coverage procedure, Root coverage procedures, Root coverage surgeries, Root coverage table, Root coverage therapies, Root coverage therapy, Sample characteristics, Subjective assessment, Substantial agreement, Surgical, Surgical procedure, System preoperative assessment postoperative assessment, Tissue graft, Tooth mesially, Untrained, Untrained observers, Untrained periodontist, Untrained periodontists, Weighted kappa.
- Teeft :
- Aesthetic appearance, Aesthetic assessment, Aesthetic outcome, Aesthetic outcomes, Aesthetic results, Assessment method, Augmentation, Authors journal compilation, Best interrater agreement, Bouchard, Clin periodontol, Clinical periodontology, Clinical trials, Coincident patients, Coincident recessions, Comparative study, Complete root coverage, Cosmetic, Cosmetic assessment, Cosmetic outcome, Cosmetic results, Denis diderot university, Different methods, Different types, Edentulous area, Envelope techniques, Fair degree, Future trials, Gingival, Gingival augmentation, Gingival recession, Global assessment, Graft, Image analysis system, Important outcome, International journal, Interobserver agreement, Interrater, Interrater agreement, Intraobserver, Intraobserver agreement, Intrarater, Intrarater agreement, John wiley sons, John wiley sons assessment method, Kerner, Limited training, Observer agreement, Ordinal, Ordinal scale, Patient judgement, Patient satisfaction, Periodontal plastic surgery, Periodontist, Periodontology, Photographic assessment, Postoperative, Postoperative assessment, Postoperative views, Preoperative, Present study, Professional assessment, Professional observers, Prosthodontist, Prosthodontist nurse, Qualitative panel, Random panel, Recession lack, Reliability, Retrospective study, Review panel, Root coverage, Root coverage percentage, Root coverage procedure, Root coverage procedures, Root coverage surgeries, Root coverage table, Root coverage therapies, Root coverage therapy, Sample characteristics, Subjective assessment, Substantial agreement, Surgical, Surgical procedure, System preoperative assessment postoperative assessment, Tissue graft, Tooth mesially, Untrained, Untrained observers, Untrained periodontist, Untrained periodontists, Weighted kappa.
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the reliability of professional qualitative scoring methods used in evaluating aesthetic results after root coverage therapy and to evaluate the relationship between subjective and objective measurements.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01348.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:548073C3C344BDA8BCCBB2093A91DCC802A467B6Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A comparison of methods of aesthetic assessment in root coverage procedures</title><author><name sortKey="Kerner, Stephane" sort="Kerner, Stephane" uniqKey="Kerner S" first="Stéphane" last="Kerner">Stéphane Kerner</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Katsahian, Sandrine" sort="Katsahian, Sandrine" uniqKey="Katsahian S" first="Sandrine" last="Katsahian">Sandrine Katsahian</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Biostatistics, Saint Louis Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7‐ Denis Diderot University, Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sarfati, Alexandre" sort="Sarfati, Alexandre" uniqKey="Sarfati A" first="Alexandre" last="Sarfati">Alexandre Sarfati</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Korngold, Stephane" sort="Korngold, Stephane" uniqKey="Korngold S" first="Stéphane" last="Korngold">Stéphane Korngold</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jakmakjian, Sebastien" sort="Jakmakjian, Sebastien" uniqKey="Jakmakjian S" first="Sébastien" last="Jakmakjian">Sébastien Jakmakjian</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Tavernier, Bruno" sort="Tavernier, Bruno" uniqKey="Tavernier B" first="Bruno" last="Tavernier">Bruno Tavernier</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Valet, Fabien" sort="Valet, Fabien" uniqKey="Valet F" first="Fabien" last="Valet">Fabien Valet</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bouchard, Philippe" sort="Bouchard, Philippe" uniqKey="Bouchard P" first="Philippe" last="Bouchard">Philippe Bouchard</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:548073C3C344BDA8BCCBB2093A91DCC802A467B6</idno><date when="2009" year="2009">2009</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01348.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/548073C3C344BDA8BCCBB2093A91DCC802A467B6/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002967</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002967</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A comparison of methods of aesthetic assessment in root coverage procedures</title><author><name sortKey="Kerner, Stephane" sort="Kerner, Stephane" uniqKey="Kerner S" first="Stéphane" last="Kerner">Stéphane Kerner</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Katsahian, Sandrine" sort="Katsahian, Sandrine" uniqKey="Katsahian S" first="Sandrine" last="Katsahian">Sandrine Katsahian</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Biostatistics, Saint Louis Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7‐ Denis Diderot University, Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sarfati, Alexandre" sort="Sarfati, Alexandre" uniqKey="Sarfati A" first="Alexandre" last="Sarfati">Alexandre Sarfati</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Korngold, Stephane" sort="Korngold, Stephane" uniqKey="Korngold S" first="Stéphane" last="Korngold">Stéphane Korngold</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jakmakjian, Sebastien" sort="Jakmakjian, Sebastien" uniqKey="Jakmakjian S" first="Sébastien" last="Jakmakjian">Sébastien Jakmakjian</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Tavernier, Bruno" sort="Tavernier, Bruno" uniqKey="Tavernier B" first="Bruno" last="Tavernier">Bruno Tavernier</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Valet, Fabien" sort="Valet, Fabien" uniqKey="Valet F" first="Fabien" last="Valet">Fabien Valet</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bouchard, Philippe" sort="Bouchard, Philippe" uniqKey="Bouchard P" first="Philippe" last="Bouchard">Philippe Bouchard</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-051X</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">36</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="80">80</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="87">87</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2009-01">2009-01</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aesthetic appearance</term><term>Aesthetic assessment</term><term>Aesthetic outcome</term><term>Aesthetic outcomes</term><term>Aesthetic results</term><term>Assessment method</term><term>Augmentation</term><term>Authors journal compilation</term><term>Best interrater agreement</term><term>Bouchard</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Clinical trials</term><term>Coincident patients</term><term>Coincident recessions</term><term>Comparative study</term><term>Complete root coverage</term><term>Cosmetic</term><term>Cosmetic assessment</term><term>Cosmetic outcome</term><term>Cosmetic results</term><term>Denis diderot university</term><term>Different methods</term><term>Different types</term><term>Edentulous area</term><term>Envelope techniques</term><term>Fair degree</term><term>Future trials</term><term>Gingival</term><term>Gingival augmentation</term><term>Gingival recession</term><term>Global assessment</term><term>Graft</term><term>Image analysis system</term><term>Important outcome</term><term>International journal</term><term>Interobserver agreement</term><term>Interrater</term><term>Interrater agreement</term><term>Intraobserver</term><term>Intraobserver agreement</term><term>Intrarater</term><term>Intrarater agreement</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>John wiley sons assessment method</term><term>Kerner</term><term>Limited training</term><term>Observer agreement</term><term>Ordinal</term><term>Ordinal scale</term><term>Patient judgement</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Periodontal plastic surgery</term><term>Periodontist</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Photographic assessment</term><term>Postoperative</term><term>Postoperative assessment</term><term>Postoperative views</term><term>Preoperative</term><term>Present study</term><term>Professional assessment</term><term>Professional observers</term><term>Prosthodontist</term><term>Prosthodontist nurse</term><term>Qualitative panel</term><term>Random panel</term><term>Recession lack</term><term>Reliability</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Review panel</term><term>Root coverage</term><term>Root coverage percentage</term><term>Root coverage procedure</term><term>Root coverage procedures</term><term>Root coverage surgeries</term><term>Root coverage table</term><term>Root coverage therapies</term><term>Root coverage therapy</term><term>Sample characteristics</term><term>Subjective assessment</term><term>Substantial agreement</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical procedure</term><term>System preoperative assessment postoperative assessment</term><term>Tissue graft</term><term>Tooth mesially</term><term>Untrained</term><term>Untrained observers</term><term>Untrained periodontist</term><term>Untrained periodontists</term><term>Weighted kappa</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Aesthetic appearance</term><term>Aesthetic assessment</term><term>Aesthetic outcome</term><term>Aesthetic outcomes</term><term>Aesthetic results</term><term>Assessment method</term><term>Augmentation</term><term>Authors journal compilation</term><term>Best interrater agreement</term><term>Bouchard</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Clinical trials</term><term>Coincident patients</term><term>Coincident recessions</term><term>Comparative study</term><term>Complete root coverage</term><term>Cosmetic</term><term>Cosmetic assessment</term><term>Cosmetic outcome</term><term>Cosmetic results</term><term>Denis diderot university</term><term>Different methods</term><term>Different types</term><term>Edentulous area</term><term>Envelope techniques</term><term>Fair degree</term><term>Future trials</term><term>Gingival</term><term>Gingival augmentation</term><term>Gingival recession</term><term>Global assessment</term><term>Graft</term><term>Image analysis system</term><term>Important outcome</term><term>International journal</term><term>Interobserver agreement</term><term>Interrater</term><term>Interrater agreement</term><term>Intraobserver</term><term>Intraobserver agreement</term><term>Intrarater</term><term>Intrarater agreement</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>John wiley sons assessment method</term><term>Kerner</term><term>Limited training</term><term>Observer agreement</term><term>Ordinal</term><term>Ordinal scale</term><term>Patient judgement</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Periodontal plastic surgery</term><term>Periodontist</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Photographic assessment</term><term>Postoperative</term><term>Postoperative assessment</term><term>Postoperative views</term><term>Preoperative</term><term>Present study</term><term>Professional assessment</term><term>Professional observers</term><term>Prosthodontist</term><term>Prosthodontist nurse</term><term>Qualitative panel</term><term>Random panel</term><term>Recession lack</term><term>Reliability</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Review panel</term><term>Root coverage</term><term>Root coverage percentage</term><term>Root coverage procedure</term><term>Root coverage procedures</term><term>Root coverage surgeries</term><term>Root coverage table</term><term>Root coverage therapies</term><term>Root coverage therapy</term><term>Sample characteristics</term><term>Subjective assessment</term><term>Substantial agreement</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical procedure</term><term>System preoperative assessment postoperative assessment</term><term>Tissue graft</term><term>Tooth mesially</term><term>Untrained</term><term>Untrained observers</term><term>Untrained periodontist</term><term>Untrained periodontists</term><term>Weighted kappa</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Aim: To evaluate the reliability of professional qualitative scoring methods used in evaluating aesthetic results after root coverage therapy and to evaluate the relationship between subjective and objective measurements.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>periodontist</json:string><json:string>prosthodontist</json:string><json:string>root coverage</json:string><json:string>gingival</json:string><json:string>untrained periodontist</json:string><json:string>periodontology</json:string><json:string>preoperative</json:string><json:string>intrarater</json:string><json:string>postoperative</json:string><json:string>ordinal</json:string><json:string>interrater</json:string><json:string>kerner</json:string><json:string>intraobserver</json:string><json:string>photographic assessment</json:string><json:string>untrained</json:string><json:string>bouchard</json:string><json:string>authors journal compilation</json:string><json:string>ordinal scale</json:string><json:string>aesthetic assessment</json:string><json:string>augmentation</json:string><json:string>interrater agreement</json:string><json:string>gingival augmentation</json:string><json:string>prosthodontist nurse</json:string><json:string>cosmetic</json:string><json:string>intraobserver agreement</json:string><json:string>root coverage therapy</json:string><json:string>aesthetic results</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>clinical periodontology</json:string><json:string>review panel</json:string><json:string>graft</json:string><json:string>surgical procedure</json:string><json:string>aesthetic outcome</json:string><json:string>substantial agreement</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>reliability</json:string><json:string>image analysis system</json:string><json:string>denis diderot university</json:string><json:string>root coverage surgeries</json:string><json:string>different types</json:string><json:string>sample characteristics</json:string><json:string>assessment method</json:string><json:string>different methods</json:string><json:string>cosmetic assessment</json:string><json:string>root coverage procedures</json:string><json:string>interobserver agreement</json:string><json:string>comparative study</json:string><json:string>gingival recession</json:string><json:string>subjective assessment</json:string><json:string>clin periodontol</json:string><json:string>qualitative panel</json:string><json:string>important outcome</json:string><json:string>retrospective study</json:string><json:string>coincident patients</json:string><json:string>coincident recessions</json:string><json:string>clinical trials</json:string><json:string>cosmetic outcome</json:string><json:string>tissue graft</json:string><json:string>envelope techniques</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>future trials</json:string><json:string>root coverage therapies</json:string><json:string>tooth mesially</json:string><json:string>edentulous area</json:string><json:string>professional assessment</json:string><json:string>root coverage percentage</json:string><json:string>recession lack</json:string><json:string>intrarater agreement</json:string><json:string>root coverage procedure</json:string><json:string>root coverage table</json:string><json:string>untrained observers</json:string><json:string>postoperative views</json:string><json:string>best interrater agreement</json:string><json:string>observer agreement</json:string><json:string>fair degree</json:string><json:string>complete root coverage</json:string><json:string>untrained periodontists</json:string><json:string>professional observers</json:string><json:string>random panel</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons assessment method</json:string><json:string>postoperative assessment</json:string><json:string>global assessment</json:string><json:string>system preoperative assessment postoperative assessment</json:string><json:string>aesthetic appearance</json:string><json:string>patient judgement</json:string><json:string>limited training</json:string><json:string>periodontal plastic surgery</json:string><json:string>aesthetic outcomes</json:string><json:string>patient satisfaction</json:string><json:string>weighted kappa</json:string><json:string>cosmetic results</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Stéphane Kerner</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Sandrine Katsahian</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Biostatistics, Saint Louis Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7‐ Denis Diderot University, Paris, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Alexandre Sarfati</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Stéphane Korngold</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Sébastien Jakmakjian</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Bruno Tavernier</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Fabien Valet</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, Paris, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Philippe Bouchard</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>aesthetic evaluation methods</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>gingival recession/surgery</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>gingival recession/therapy</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>image analysis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>observer agreement</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JCPE1348</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-QR3XP4MS-C</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Aim: To evaluate the reliability of professional qualitative scoring methods used in evaluating aesthetic results after root coverage therapy and to evaluate the relationship between subjective and objective measurements.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.966</score><pdfWordCount>4618</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>33235</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>29</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>221</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>A comparison of methods of aesthetic assessment in root coverage procedures</title><pmid><json:string>19046324</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0303-6979</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-051X</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JCPE</json:string></publisherId><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>80</first><last>87</last><total>8</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2009</json:string><json:string>2006</json:string><json:string>between 1981 and 2005</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Alexandre Sarfati</json:string><json:string>Age</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Fabien Valet</json:string><json:string>Sandrine Katsahian</json:string><json:string>Sebastien Jakmakjian</json:string><json:string>Stephane Korngold</json:string><json:string>Bruno Tavernier</json:string><json:string>Philippe Bouchard</json:string><json:string>The</json:string><json:string>Dieu Hospital</json:string><json:string>Treated</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>Redmond</json:string><json:string>WA</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Miller 1985</json:string><json:string>Fleiss & Cohen 1973</json:string><json:string>Sacchini et al. 1991</json:string><json:string>Koran 1975</json:string><json:string>Kerner et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Kerner et al.</json:string><json:string>Lowery et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Cairo et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Aichelmann-Reidy et al. 2001</json:string><json:string>Landis & Koch 1977</json:string><json:string>Bouchard et al. (2001)</json:string><json:string>Harris et al. 1979</json:string><json:string>Rosetti et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Bouchard et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Sneeuw et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Colton 1974</json:string><json:string>Wang et al. (2001)</json:string><json:string>Bouchard et al. 2001</json:string><json:string>December 2006</json:string><json:string>Kerner et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Rotundo et al.</json:string><json:string>Rotundo et al. 2008</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-QR3XP4MS-C</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Periodontics</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2009</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2009</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01348.x</json:string></doi><id>548073C3C344BDA8BCCBB2093A91DCC802A467B6</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/548073C3C344BDA8BCCBB2093A91DCC802A467B6/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/548073C3C344BDA8BCCBB2093A91DCC802A467B6/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/548073C3C344BDA8BCCBB2093A91DCC802A467B6/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">A comparison of methods of aesthetic assessment in root coverage procedures</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2009-01"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A comparison of methods of aesthetic assessment in root coverage procedures</title><title level="a" type="short">Assessment method for root coverage</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Stéphane</forename><surname>Kerner</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France<address><country key="FR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Sandrine</forename><surname>Katsahian</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Biostatistics, Saint Louis Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7‐ Denis Diderot University, Paris, France<address><country key="FR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Alexandre</forename><surname>Sarfati</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France<address><country key="FR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Stéphane</forename><surname>Korngold</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France<address><country key="FR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Sébastien</forename><surname>Jakmakjian</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France<address><country key="FR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0005"><persName><forename type="first">Bruno</forename><surname>Tavernier</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France<address><country key="FR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0006"><persName><forename type="first">Fabien</forename><surname>Valet</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, Paris, France<address><country key="FR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0007"><persName><forename type="first">Philippe</forename><surname>Bouchard</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France<address><country key="FR"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">548073C3C344BDA8BCCBB2093A91DCC802A467B6</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-QR3XP4MS-C</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01348.x</idno><idno type="unit">JCPE1348</idno><idno type="supplier">1348</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JCPE.JCPE1348.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="pISSN">0303-6979</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-051X</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cpe.2009.36.issue-1</idno><idno type="product">JCPE</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">36</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="80">80</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="87">87</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2009-01"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p><hi rend="bold">Aim: </hi> To evaluate the reliability of professional qualitative scoring methods used in evaluating aesthetic results after root coverage therapy and to evaluate the relationship between subjective and objective measurements.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Material and Methods: </hi> A review panel of seven professional and non‐professional, trained and untrained observers used photographic records to assess the overall cosmetic results of 162 root coverage surgical procedures in 133 patients (mean follow‐up 17.51±17.37 months). Two different methods were used. In the before–after panel scoring system, observers evaluated the difference between preoperative and postoperative views, whereas in the random panel scoring system, observers rated each photograph independently.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi> For both methods, intrarater agreement ranged from substantial to almost perfect for the periodontists. The best interrater agreement was found for trained periodontists using the five‐point ordinal scale of the before–after panel scoring system (<hi rend="italic">κ</hi>=0.68). Neither root coverage percentage nor gingival augmentation was correlated to cosmetic assessment.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusions: </hi> The before–after scoring system is an acceptable and reliable method for professional cosmetic assessment of root coverage therapy. The overall cosmetic evaluation does not appear to be related to the percentage of root coverage.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">aesthetic evaluation methods</term><term xml:id="k2">gingival recession/surgery</term><term xml:id="k3">gingival recession/therapy</term><term xml:id="k4">image analysis</term><term xml:id="k5">observer agreement</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Periodontal Therapy</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/548073C3C344BDA8BCCBB2093A91DCC802A467B6/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</doi><issn type="print">0303-6979</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-051X</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JCPE"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="01001"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cpe.2009.36.issue-1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="36">36</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2009-01">January 2009</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="13" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01348.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JCPE1348"></id><id type="supplier" value="1348"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="8"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Periodontal Therapy</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2008-11-27"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2009-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-09"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-23"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="80">80</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="87">87</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Address:
<i>Philippe Bouchard</i>
<i>U.F.R. d'Odontologie</i>
<i>5, rue Garancière</i>
<i>75006 Paris</i>
<i>France</i>
E‐mail: <email normalForm="phbouch@noos.fr">phbouch@noos.fr</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JCPE.JCPE1348.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication 13 October 2008</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="1"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="8"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="21"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="6468"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="48"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">A comparison of methods of aesthetic assessment in root coverage procedures</title><title type="shortAuthors">Kerner et al.</title><title type="short">Assessment method for root coverage</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Stéphane</givenNames><familyName>Kerner</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Sandrine</givenNames><familyName>Katsahian</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Alexandre</givenNames><familyName>Sarfati</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Stéphane</givenNames><familyName>Korngold</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Sébastien</givenNames><familyName>Jakmakjian</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr6" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Bruno</givenNames><familyName>Tavernier</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr7" affiliationRef="#a4"><personName><givenNames>Fabien</givenNames><familyName>Valet</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr8" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Philippe</givenNames><familyName>Bouchard</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="FR"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="FR"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Biostatistics, Saint Louis Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7‐ Denis Diderot University, Paris, France</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="FR"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="FR"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, Paris, France</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">aesthetic evaluation methods</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">gingival recession/surgery</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">gingival recession/therapy</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">image analysis</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">observer agreement</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><!--
Kerner S, Katsahian S, Sarfati A, Korngold S, Jakmakjian S, Tavernier B, Valet F, Bouchard P. A comparison of methods of aesthetic assessment in root coverage procedures. J Clin Periodontol 2009; 36: 80–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01348.x.
--><title type="main">Abstract</title><p><b>Aim: </b> To evaluate the reliability of professional qualitative scoring methods used in evaluating aesthetic results after root coverage therapy and to evaluate the relationship between subjective and objective measurements.</p><p><b>Material and Methods: </b> A review panel of seven professional and non‐professional, trained and untrained observers used photographic records to assess the overall cosmetic results of 162 root coverage surgical procedures in 133 patients (mean follow‐up 17.51±17.37 months). Two different methods were used. In the before–after panel scoring system, observers evaluated the difference between preoperative and postoperative views, whereas in the random panel scoring system, observers rated each photograph independently.</p><p><b>Results: </b> For both methods, intrarater agreement ranged from substantial to almost perfect for the periodontists. The best interrater agreement was found for trained periodontists using the five‐point ordinal scale of the before–after panel scoring system (<i>κ</i>=0.68). Neither root coverage percentage nor gingival augmentation was correlated to cosmetic assessment.</p><p><b>Conclusions: </b> The before–after scoring system is an acceptable and reliable method for professional cosmetic assessment of root coverage therapy. The overall cosmetic evaluation does not appear to be related to the percentage of root coverage.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note xml:id="fn1" numbered="no"><p><b>Conflict of interest and source of funding statement</b>
No external funding, apart from the support of the authors' institution, was available for this study.</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>A comparison of methods of aesthetic assessment in root coverage procedures</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Assessment method for root coverage</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>A comparison of methods of aesthetic assessment in root coverage procedures</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Stéphane</namePart><namePart type="family">Kerner</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Sandrine</namePart><namePart type="family">Katsahian</namePart><affiliation>Department of Biostatistics, Saint Louis Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7‐ Denis Diderot University, Paris, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Alexandre</namePart><namePart type="family">Sarfati</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Stéphane</namePart><namePart type="family">Korngold</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Sébastien</namePart><namePart type="family">Jakmakjian</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Bruno</namePart><namePart type="family">Tavernier</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Fabien</namePart><namePart type="family">Valet</namePart><affiliation>Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, Paris, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Philippe</namePart><namePart type="family">Bouchard</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP, Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2009-01</dateIssued><edition>Accepted for publication 13 October 2008</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2009</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">1</extent><extent unit="tables">8</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">21</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">48</extent><extent unit="words">6468</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Aim: To evaluate the reliability of professional qualitative scoring methods used in evaluating aesthetic results after root coverage therapy and to evaluate the relationship between subjective and objective measurements.</abstract><abstract>Material and Methods: A review panel of seven professional and non‐professional, trained and untrained observers used photographic records to assess the overall cosmetic results of 162 root coverage surgical procedures in 133 patients (mean follow‐up 17.51±17.37 months). Two different methods were used. In the before–after panel scoring system, observers evaluated the difference between preoperative and postoperative views, whereas in the random panel scoring system, observers rated each photograph independently.</abstract><abstract>Results: For both methods, intrarater agreement ranged from substantial to almost perfect for the periodontists. The best interrater agreement was found for trained periodontists using the five‐point ordinal scale of the before–after panel scoring system (κ=0.68). Neither root coverage percentage nor gingival augmentation was correlated to cosmetic assessment.</abstract><abstract>Conclusions: The before–after scoring system is an acceptable and reliable method for professional cosmetic assessment of root coverage therapy. The overall cosmetic evaluation does not appear to be related to the percentage of root coverage.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>aesthetic evaluation methods</topic><topic>gingival recession/surgery</topic><topic>gingival recession/therapy</topic><topic>image analysis</topic><topic>observer agreement</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0303-6979</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-051X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JCPE</identifier><part><date>2009</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>36</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>80</start><end>87</end><total>8</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">548073C3C344BDA8BCCBB2093A91DCC802A467B6</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-QR3XP4MS-C</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01348.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JCPE1348</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/548073C3C344BDA8BCCBB2093A91DCC802A467B6/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002967 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002967 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:548073C3C344BDA8BCCBB2093A91DCC802A467B6
|texte= A comparison of methods of aesthetic assessment in root coverage procedures
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |