A Retrospective, Multicenter Study on a Novo Wide‐Body Implant for Posterior Regions
Identifieur interne : 002915 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002914; suivant : 002916A Retrospective, Multicenter Study on a Novo Wide‐Body Implant for Posterior Regions
Auteurs : Stefan Vandeweghe ; Andrew Ackermann ; John Bronner ; André Hattingh ; Alex Tschakaloff ; Hugo De BruynSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2012-04.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Bone level, Bone loss, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Clinical examination, Clinical implant dentistry, Current study, Dent, Dentistry, Early loading, Extraction sockets, Failure rates, Fresh extraction sockets, Immediate loading, Immediate placement, Implant, Implant design, Implant diameter, Implant distribution, Implant failure, Implant length, Implant placement, Implant survival, Implant survival rate, Mandible, Mature bone, Maxilla, Maxillofac, Molar, Multicenter, Multicenter study, Oral implantol, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral maxillofac surg, Posterior mandible, Posterior region, Posterior regions, Private practice, Prospective multicenter study, Prospective study, Prosthet dent, Prosthetic, Retrospective, Socket, Southern implants, Surgical, Surgical protocol, Survival rate, Survival rates, Thread pitch, Treatment outcome.
- Teeft :
- Bone level, Bone loss, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Clinical examination, Clinical implant dentistry, Current study, Dent, Dentistry, Early loading, Extraction sockets, Failure rates, Fresh extraction sockets, Immediate loading, Immediate placement, Implant, Implant design, Implant diameter, Implant distribution, Implant failure, Implant length, Implant placement, Implant survival, Implant survival rate, Mandible, Mature bone, Maxilla, Maxillofac, Molar, Multicenter, Multicenter study, Oral implantol, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral maxillofac surg, Posterior mandible, Posterior region, Posterior regions, Private practice, Prospective multicenter study, Prospective study, Prosthet dent, Prosthetic, Retrospective, Socket, Southern implants, Surgical, Surgical protocol, Survival rate, Survival rates, Thread pitch, Treatment outcome.
Abstract
Background: Wide implants are recommended as “rescues” after failure to increase primary stability in extraction sockets or in poor quality bone. Consequently, inferior results compared with regular diameter implants have been reported.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00253.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:538521BBCA0D0FBFED307A0BC9925A1235C95A78Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A Retrospective, Multicenter Study on a Novo Wide‐Body Implant for Posterior Regions</title><author><name sortKey="Vandeweghe, Stefan" sort="Vandeweghe, Stefan" uniqKey="Vandeweghe S" first="Stefan" last="Vandeweghe">Stefan Vandeweghe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Prosthodontist, Department of Periodontology & Oral Implantology, University Hospital, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ackermann, Andrew" sort="Ackermann, Andrew" uniqKey="Ackermann A" first="Andrew" last="Ackermann">Andrew Ackermann</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>private practice for prosthodontics, Johannesburg, South Africa;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bronner, John" sort="Bronner, John" uniqKey="Bronner J" first="John" last="Bronner">John Bronner</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>practice for prosthodontics and implantology, Medi‐Clinic, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>practice for prosthodontics, St. Augustine's Hospital, Durban, South Africa;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hattingh, Andre" sort="Hattingh, Andre" uniqKey="Hattingh A" first="André" last="Hattingh">André Hattingh</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>private practice for periodontics, Sevenoaks, Kent, UK;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Tschakaloff, Alex" sort="Tschakaloff, Alex" uniqKey="Tschakaloff A" first="Alex" last="Tschakaloff">Alex Tschakaloff</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>private practice for maxillofacial surgery, Pinneberg, Germany;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Bruyn, Hugo" sort="De Bruyn, Hugo" uniqKey="De Bruyn H" first="Hugo" last="De Bruyn">Hugo De Bruyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>professor and chairman, Department of Periodontology & Oral Implantology, University Hospital, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: hugo.debruyn@ugent.be</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:538521BBCA0D0FBFED307A0BC9925A1235C95A78</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00253.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/538521BBCA0D0FBFED307A0BC9925A1235C95A78/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002915</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002915</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A Retrospective, Multicenter Study on a Novo Wide‐Body Implant for Posterior Regions</title><author><name sortKey="Vandeweghe, Stefan" sort="Vandeweghe, Stefan" uniqKey="Vandeweghe S" first="Stefan" last="Vandeweghe">Stefan Vandeweghe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Prosthodontist, Department of Periodontology & Oral Implantology, University Hospital, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ackermann, Andrew" sort="Ackermann, Andrew" uniqKey="Ackermann A" first="Andrew" last="Ackermann">Andrew Ackermann</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>private practice for prosthodontics, Johannesburg, South Africa;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bronner, John" sort="Bronner, John" uniqKey="Bronner J" first="John" last="Bronner">John Bronner</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>practice for prosthodontics and implantology, Medi‐Clinic, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>practice for prosthodontics, St. Augustine's Hospital, Durban, South Africa;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hattingh, Andre" sort="Hattingh, Andre" uniqKey="Hattingh A" first="André" last="Hattingh">André Hattingh</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>private practice for periodontics, Sevenoaks, Kent, UK;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Tschakaloff, Alex" sort="Tschakaloff, Alex" uniqKey="Tschakaloff A" first="Alex" last="Tschakaloff">Alex Tschakaloff</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>private practice for maxillofacial surgery, Pinneberg, Germany;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Bruyn, Hugo" sort="De Bruyn, Hugo" uniqKey="De Bruyn H" first="Hugo" last="De Bruyn">Hugo De Bruyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>professor and chairman, Department of Periodontology & Oral Implantology, University Hospital, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: hugo.debruyn@ugent.be</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="281">281</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="292">292</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">12</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-04">2012-04</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clinical examination</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Current study</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Early loading</term><term>Extraction sockets</term><term>Failure rates</term><term>Fresh extraction sockets</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Immediate placement</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant design</term><term>Implant diameter</term><term>Implant distribution</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant length</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant survival</term><term>Implant survival rate</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mature bone</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Molar</term><term>Multicenter</term><term>Multicenter study</term><term>Oral implantol</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral maxillofac surg</term><term>Posterior mandible</term><term>Posterior region</term><term>Posterior regions</term><term>Private practice</term><term>Prospective multicenter study</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Retrospective</term><term>Socket</term><term>Southern implants</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical protocol</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Survival rates</term><term>Thread pitch</term><term>Treatment outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clinical examination</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Current study</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Early loading</term><term>Extraction sockets</term><term>Failure rates</term><term>Fresh extraction sockets</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Immediate placement</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant design</term><term>Implant diameter</term><term>Implant distribution</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant length</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant survival</term><term>Implant survival rate</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mature bone</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Molar</term><term>Multicenter</term><term>Multicenter study</term><term>Oral implantol</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral maxillofac surg</term><term>Posterior mandible</term><term>Posterior region</term><term>Posterior regions</term><term>Private practice</term><term>Prospective multicenter study</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Retrospective</term><term>Socket</term><term>Southern implants</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical protocol</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Survival rates</term><term>Thread pitch</term><term>Treatment outcome</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Background: Wide implants are recommended as “rescues” after failure to increase primary stability in extraction sockets or in poor quality bone. Consequently, inferior results compared with regular diameter implants have been reported.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>maxillofac</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>multicenter</json:string><json:string>immediate loading</json:string><json:string>posterior regions</json:string><json:string>early loading</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>current study</json:string><json:string>treatment outcome</json:string><json:string>immediate placement</json:string><json:string>surgical protocol</json:string><json:string>clin implant dent relat</json:string><json:string>survival rate</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>molar</json:string><json:string>implant length</json:string><json:string>implant design</json:string><json:string>implant survival</json:string><json:string>southern implants</json:string><json:string>extraction sockets</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>private practice</json:string><json:string>posterior region</json:string><json:string>survival rates</json:string><json:string>prosthet dent</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>posterior mandible</json:string><json:string>retrospective</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>prospective multicenter study</json:string><json:string>fresh extraction sockets</json:string><json:string>oral implantol</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac surg</json:string><json:string>mature bone</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>implant failure</json:string><json:string>multicenter study</json:string><json:string>implant survival rate</json:string><json:string>clinical examination</json:string><json:string>implant distribution</json:string><json:string>bone level</json:string><json:string>thread pitch</json:string><json:string>implant diameter</json:string><json:string>failure rates</json:string><json:string>socket</json:string><json:string>extraction</json:string><json:string>posterior</json:string><json:string>other implants</json:string><json:string>wide diameter</json:string><json:string>tooth extraction</json:string><json:string>single crowns</json:string><json:string>radiographic analyses</json:string><json:string>prosthetic diameter</json:string><json:string>residual space</json:string><json:string>bone resorption</json:string><json:string>implant bone loss success</json:string><json:string>bone gain</json:string><json:string>immediate loading group</json:string><json:string>loading protocol</json:string><json:string>extraction cases</json:string><json:string>implant success rates</json:string><json:string>impression material</json:string><json:string>extraction socket</json:string><json:string>prosthetic parameters</json:string><json:string>more bone loss</json:string><json:string>functional loading</json:string><json:string>bone extraction socket</json:string><json:string>implant success rate</json:string><json:string>surgical parameters</json:string><json:string>implant stability</json:string><json:string>immediate implant placement</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>molar replacement</json:string><json:string>less bone loss</json:string><json:string>implant dent</json:string><json:string>posterior maxilla</json:string><json:string>posterior teeth</json:string><json:string>university hospital</json:string><json:string>molar extraction sockets</json:string><json:string>regular diameter implants</json:string><json:string>implant diameters</json:string><json:string>experimental study</json:string><json:string>loading time</json:string><json:string>bone graft</json:string><json:string>consecutive cases</json:string><json:string>straumann implants</json:string><json:string>wide implants</json:string><json:string>preliminary results</json:string><json:string>implant position</json:string><json:string>mandibular overdentures</json:string><json:string>operative procedure</json:string><json:string>different implant systems</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Stefan Vandeweghe DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Prosthodontist, Department of Periodontology & Oral Implantology, University Hospital, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Andrew Ackermann BChD, MChD</name><affiliations><json:string>private practice for prosthodontics, Johannesburg, South Africa;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>John Bronner BChD, MChD</name><affiliations><json:string>practice for prosthodontics and implantology, Medi‐Clinic, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa;</json:string><json:string>practice for prosthodontics, St. Augustine's Hospital, Durban, South Africa;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>André Hattingh BChD, MChD</name><affiliations><json:string>private practice for periodontics, Sevenoaks, Kent, UK;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Alex Tschakaloff DMD, MD</name><affiliations><json:string>private practice for maxillofacial surgery, Pinneberg, Germany;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Hugo De Bruyn DDS, Msc, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>professor and chairman, Department of Periodontology & Oral Implantology, University Hospital, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium</json:string><json:string>E-mail: hugo.debruyn@ugent.be</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implant</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>immediate loading</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>immediate placement</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>posterior region</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>wide body</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>wide diameter</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID253</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-V882KLV5-5</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Background: Wide implants are recommended as “rescues” after failure to increase primary stability in extraction sockets or in poor quality bone. Consequently, inferior results compared with regular diameter implants have been reported.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>32</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>236</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>6</keywordCount><score>7.384</score><pdfWordCount>5183</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>33807</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>12</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>585 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>A Retrospective, Multicenter Study on a Novo Wide‐Body Implant for Posterior Regions</title><pmid><json:string>19958373</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>281</first><last>292</last><total>12</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2012</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Dental School Department of Periodontology and Oral</json:string><json:string>Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</json:string><json:string>University of Ghent, Belgium</json:string><json:string>Ethical Committee of the University Hospital Ghent, Belgium</json:string><json:string>Augustine’s Hospital, Durban, South Africa</json:string><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>University Hospital, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium Reprint</json:string><json:string>Department of Periodontology</json:string><json:string>University Hospital, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Andrew Ackermann</json:string><json:string>Alex Tschakaloff</json:string><json:string>Selection</json:string><json:string>Abboud</json:string><json:string>Hugo De Bruyn</json:string><json:string>Gomez-Roman</json:string><json:string>Eckert</json:string><json:string>Mordenfeld</json:string><json:string>John Bronner</json:string><json:string>André Hattingh</json:string><json:string>Mombelli</json:string><json:string>Luongo</json:string><json:string>Zöllner</json:string><json:string>Achilli</json:string><json:string>Schincaglia</json:string><json:string>Penarrocha-Diago</json:string><json:string>Grunder</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>UK</json:string><json:string>Pietermaritzburg</json:string><json:string>South Africa</json:string><json:string>Belgium</json:string><json:string>Johannesburg</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-V882KLV5-5</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00253.x</json:string></doi><id>538521BBCA0D0FBFED307A0BC9925A1235C95A78</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/538521BBCA0D0FBFED307A0BC9925A1235C95A78/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/538521BBCA0D0FBFED307A0BC9925A1235C95A78/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/538521BBCA0D0FBFED307A0BC9925A1235C95A78/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">A Retrospective, Multicenter Study on a Novo Wide‐Body Implant for Posterior Regions</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2012-04"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A Retrospective, Multicenter Study on a Novo Wide‐Body Implant for Posterior Regions</title><title level="a" type="short">Novo Wide‐body Implant for Posterior Regions</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Stefan</forename><surname>Vandeweghe</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Prosthodontist, Department of Periodontology & Oral Implantology, University Hospital, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium;<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Andrew</forename><surname>Ackermann</surname><roleName type="degree">BChD, MChD</roleName></persName><affiliation>private practice for prosthodontics, Johannesburg, South Africa;<address><country key="ZA"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">John</forename><surname>Bronner</surname><roleName type="degree">BChD, MChD</roleName></persName><affiliation>practice for prosthodontics and implantology, Medi‐Clinic, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa;<address><country key="ZA"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>practice for prosthodontics, St. Augustine's Hospital, Durban, South Africa;<address><country key="ZA"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">André</forename><surname>Hattingh</surname><roleName type="degree">BChD, MChD</roleName></persName><affiliation>private practice for periodontics, Sevenoaks, Kent, UK;</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Alex</forename><surname>Tschakaloff</surname><roleName type="degree">DMD, MD</roleName></persName><affiliation>private practice for maxillofacial surgery, Pinneberg, Germany;<address><country key="DE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0005" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Hugo</forename><surname>De Bruyn</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, Msc, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>professor and chairman, Department of Periodontology & Oral Implantology, University Hospital, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Dr. Hugo De Bruyn, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, De Pintelaan 185, B‐9000 Gent, Belgium; e‐mail: hugo.debruyn@ugent.be</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">538521BBCA0D0FBFED307A0BC9925A1235C95A78</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-V882KLV5-5</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00253.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID253</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID253.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2012.14.issue-2</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="281">281</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="292">292</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">12</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-04"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p><hi rend="bold">Background:</hi> Wide implants are recommended as “rescues” after failure to increase primary stability in extraction sockets or in poor quality bone. Consequently, inferior results compared with regular diameter implants have been reported.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Purpose:</hi> The purpose of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the outcome of a novo wide‐body implant (Max® implant, Southern Implants®, Irene, South Africa) designed for placement in the posterior regions.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and Methods:</hi> In four private practices, patients with at least one Max implant were examined by two independent examiners to determine implant survival and marginal bone loss. Surgical, prosthetic, and patient‐related parameters were evaluated to determine their influence on the treatment outcome.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results:</hi> Seventy‐five patients (31 male, 44 female), with a mean age of 58 years, received 93 Max implants (59 maxilla, 34 mandible) of 8 to 10 mm width. Twenty‐seven implants in molar extraction sockets and two in mature bone were immediately loaded; 42 in extraction sockets and 22 in mature bone were delayed loaded. The mean follow‐up was 14 months (6–34), and four implants failed (4.3%); mean bone loss after 1 year was 0.46 mm (SD 1.08; range −5.45–3.25). A total of 91.4% lost <1.5 mm of bone during the first year. The implant survival rate was 89.7% and 98.4%, respectively, for the immediate and delayed loaded implants and 95.8% and 95.7% for delayed and immediate placement. Time of placement, time of loading, surgical protocol, or prosthetic design did not affect the outcome.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion:</hi> Within the limitations of the study, the Max implant demonstrated a survival rate of 95.7% and stable bone conditions after a year, irrespective of loading or surgical protocol. Future prospective studies are needed to evaluate the soft and hard tissue changes in time.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">dental implant</term><term xml:id="k2">immediate loading</term><term xml:id="k3">immediate placement</term><term xml:id="k4">posterior region</term><term xml:id="k5">wide body</term><term xml:id="k6">wide diameter</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>ARTICLES</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/538521BBCA0D0FBFED307A0BC9925A1235C95A78/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="04102"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.2012.14.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="14">14</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-04">April 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="14" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00253.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID253"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="12"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2009-12-03"></event><event type="publishedOnlineAcceptedOrEarlyUnpaginated" date="2009-12-03"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.1.3 standalone mode:FullText" date="2012-03-22"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-03-22"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="281">281</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="292">292</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Dr. Hugo De Bruyn, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, De Pintelaan 185, B‐9000 Gent, Belgium; e‐mail: <email>hugo.debruyn@ugent.be</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID253.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="6"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="4"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="62"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="5985"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">A Retrospective, Multicenter Study on a Novo Wide‐Body Implant for Posterior Regions</title><title type="shortAuthors">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Volume *, Number *, 2009</title><title type="short">Novo Wide‐body Implant for Posterior Regions</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Stefan</givenNames><familyName>Vandeweghe</familyName><degrees>DDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Andrew</givenNames><familyName>Ackermann</familyName><degrees>BChD, MChD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3 #a4"><personName><givenNames>John</givenNames><familyName>Bronner</familyName><degrees>BChD, MChD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a5"><personName><givenNames>André</givenNames><familyName>Hattingh</familyName><degrees>BChD, MChD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a6"><personName><givenNames>Alex</givenNames><familyName>Tschakaloff</familyName><degrees>DMD, MD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr6" affiliationRef="#a7" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Hugo</givenNames><familyName>De Bruyn</familyName><degrees>DDS, Msc, PhD</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Prosthodontist, Department of Periodontology & Oral Implantology, University Hospital, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="ZA"><unparsedAffiliation>private practice for prosthodontics, Johannesburg, South Africa;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="ZA"><unparsedAffiliation>practice for prosthodontics and implantology, Medi‐Clinic, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="ZA"><unparsedAffiliation>practice for prosthodontics, St. Augustine's Hospital, Durban, South Africa;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a5"><unparsedAffiliation>private practice for periodontics, Sevenoaks, Kent, UK;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a6" countryCode="DE"><unparsedAffiliation>private practice for maxillofacial surgery, Pinneberg, Germany;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a7" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>professor and chairman, Department of Periodontology & Oral Implantology, University Hospital, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">dental implant</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">immediate loading</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">immediate placement</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">posterior region</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">wide body</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">wide diameter</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p><b>Background:</b> Wide implants are recommended as “rescues” after failure to increase primary stability in extraction sockets or in poor quality bone. Consequently, inferior results compared with regular diameter implants have been reported.</p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The purpose of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the outcome of a novo wide‐body implant (Max® implant, Southern Implants®, Irene, South Africa) designed for placement in the posterior regions.</p><p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> In four private practices, patients with at least one Max implant were examined by two independent examiners to determine implant survival and marginal bone loss. Surgical, prosthetic, and patient‐related parameters were evaluated to determine their influence on the treatment outcome.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Seventy‐five patients (31 male, 44 female), with a mean age of 58 years, received 93 Max implants (59 maxilla, 34 mandible) of 8 to 10 mm width. Twenty‐seven implants in molar extraction sockets and two in mature bone were immediately loaded; 42 in extraction sockets and 22 in mature bone were delayed loaded. The mean follow‐up was 14 months (6–34), and four implants failed (4.3%); mean bone loss after 1 year was 0.46 mm (SD 1.08; range −5.45–3.25). A total of 91.4% lost <1.5 mm of bone during the first year. The implant survival rate was 89.7% and 98.4%, respectively, for the immediate and delayed loaded implants and 95.8% and 95.7% for delayed and immediate placement. Time of placement, time of loading, surgical protocol, or prosthetic design did not affect the outcome.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Within the limitations of the study, the Max implant demonstrated a survival rate of 95.7% and stable bone conditions after a year, irrespective of loading or surgical protocol. Future prospective studies are needed to evaluate the soft and hard tissue changes in time.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>A Retrospective, Multicenter Study on a Novo Wide‐Body Implant for Posterior Regions</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Novo Wide‐body Implant for Posterior Regions</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>A Retrospective, Multicenter Study on a Novo Wide‐Body Implant for Posterior Regions</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Stefan</namePart><namePart type="family">Vandeweghe</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>Prosthodontist, Department of Periodontology & Oral Implantology, University Hospital, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Andrew</namePart><namePart type="family">Ackermann</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">BChD, MChD</namePart><affiliation>private practice for prosthodontics, Johannesburg, South Africa;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">John</namePart><namePart type="family">Bronner</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">BChD, MChD</namePart><affiliation>practice for prosthodontics and implantology, Medi‐Clinic, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa;</affiliation><affiliation>practice for prosthodontics, St. Augustine's Hospital, Durban, South Africa;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">André</namePart><namePart type="family">Hattingh</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">BChD, MChD</namePart><affiliation>private practice for periodontics, Sevenoaks, Kent, UK;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Alex</namePart><namePart type="family">Tschakaloff</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DMD, MD</namePart><affiliation>private practice for maxillofacial surgery, Pinneberg, Germany;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Hugo</namePart><namePart type="family">De Bruyn</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, Msc, PhD</namePart><affiliation>professor and chairman, Department of Periodontology & Oral Implantology, University Hospital, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: hugo.debruyn@ugent.be</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-04</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">6</extent><extent unit="tables">4</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">62</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">5985</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Background: Wide implants are recommended as “rescues” after failure to increase primary stability in extraction sockets or in poor quality bone. Consequently, inferior results compared with regular diameter implants have been reported.</abstract><abstract>Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the outcome of a novo wide‐body implant (Max® implant, Southern Implants®, Irene, South Africa) designed for placement in the posterior regions.</abstract><abstract>Materials and Methods: In four private practices, patients with at least one Max implant were examined by two independent examiners to determine implant survival and marginal bone loss. Surgical, prosthetic, and patient‐related parameters were evaluated to determine their influence on the treatment outcome.</abstract><abstract>Results: Seventy‐five patients (31 male, 44 female), with a mean age of 58 years, received 93 Max implants (59 maxilla, 34 mandible) of 8 to 10 mm width. Twenty‐seven implants in molar extraction sockets and two in mature bone were immediately loaded; 42 in extraction sockets and 22 in mature bone were delayed loaded. The mean follow‐up was 14 months (6–34), and four implants failed (4.3%); mean bone loss after 1 year was 0.46 mm (SD 1.08; range −5.45–3.25). A total of 91.4% lost <1.5 mm of bone during the first year. The implant survival rate was 89.7% and 98.4%, respectively, for the immediate and delayed loaded implants and 95.8% and 95.7% for delayed and immediate placement. Time of placement, time of loading, surgical protocol, or prosthetic design did not affect the outcome.</abstract><abstract>Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, the Max implant demonstrated a survival rate of 95.7% and stable bone conditions after a year, irrespective of loading or surgical protocol. Future prospective studies are needed to evaluate the soft and hard tissue changes in time.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>dental implant</topic><topic>immediate loading</topic><topic>immediate placement</topic><topic>posterior region</topic><topic>wide body</topic><topic>wide diameter</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>14</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>281</start><end>292</end><total>12</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">538521BBCA0D0FBFED307A0BC9925A1235C95A78</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-V882KLV5-5</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00253.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID253</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/538521BBCA0D0FBFED307A0BC9925A1235C95A78/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002915 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002915 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:538521BBCA0D0FBFED307A0BC9925A1235C95A78
|texte= A Retrospective, Multicenter Study on a Novo Wide‐Body Implant for Posterior Regions
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |