Biological complications and peri‐implant clinical and radiographic changes at immediately placed dental implants. A prospective 5‐year cohort study
Identifieur interne : 002807 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002806; suivant : 002808Biological complications and peri‐implant clinical and radiographic changes at immediately placed dental implants. A prospective 5‐year cohort study
Auteurs : Daniel Rodrigo ; Conchita Martin ; Mariano SanzSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2012-10.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Berglundh, Biological complications, Bone loss, Buccal, Clin, Clinical outcome variables, Clinical periodontology, Clinical variables, Cohort, Complication, Consecutive patients, Crestal, Crestal bone changes, Density area, Dental implants, Experimental study, Extraction, Extraction sockets, Fresh extraction sockets, Immediate implant, Immediate implant placement, Immediate implants, Immediate loading, Impl, Implant, Implant dentistry, Implant length, Implant level, Implant placement, Implant surface, Implant survival, Implant therapy, Implantation, Implants research, International journal, John wiley sons, John wiley sons rodrigo, Lang, Lindhe, Madrid, Maxillofacial, Mesial, Mesial aspect, Mucositis, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Periimplantitis, Periodontology, Plaque index, Prospective cohort study, Prospective study, Radiographic, Radiographic changes, Rodrigo, Same patients, Sanz, Socket, Soft tissues, Suppuration, Surgical, Systematic review, Tolerance method, Tooth extraction, Total agreement, Treatment groups.
- Teeft :
- Berglundh, Biological complications, Bone loss, Buccal, Clin, Clinical outcome variables, Clinical periodontology, Clinical variables, Cohort, Complication, Consecutive patients, Crestal, Crestal bone changes, Density area, Dental implants, Experimental study, Extraction, Extraction sockets, Fresh extraction sockets, Immediate implant, Immediate implant placement, Immediate implants, Immediate loading, Impl, Implant, Implant dentistry, Implant length, Implant level, Implant placement, Implant surface, Implant survival, Implant therapy, Implantation, Implants research, International journal, John wiley sons, John wiley sons rodrigo, Lang, Lindhe, Madrid, Maxillofacial, Mesial, Mesial aspect, Mucositis, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Periimplantitis, Periodontology, Plaque index, Prospective cohort study, Prospective study, Radiographic, Radiographic changes, Rodrigo, Same patients, Sanz, Socket, Soft tissues, Suppuration, Surgical, Systematic review, Tolerance method, Tooth extraction, Total agreement, Treatment groups.
Abstract
To evaluate clinically and radiographically immediate implants 5 years after insertion and to compare them with delayed‐placed implants in the same subjects
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02294.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:516C2FB1A7B12886A75853507CDA7F28DB770642Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Biological complications and peri‐implant clinical and radiographic changes at immediately placed dental implants. A prospective 5‐year cohort study</title><author><name sortKey="Rodrigo, Daniel" sort="Rodrigo, Daniel" uniqKey="Rodrigo D" first="Daniel" last="Rodrigo">Daniel Rodrigo</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Graduate Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology – University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Martin, Conchita" sort="Martin, Conchita" uniqKey="Martin C" first="Conchita" last="Martin">Conchita Martin</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>ETEP Research Group, Faculty of Odontology – University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sanz, Mariano" sort="Sanz, Mariano" uniqKey="Sanz M" first="Mariano" last="Sanz">Mariano Sanz</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Graduate Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology – University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>ETEP Research Group, Faculty of Odontology – University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Corresponding author:Facultad de OdontologíaUniversidad Complutense de MadridPlaza Ramón y Cajal28040 Madrid, SpainTel.: +34 913941901Fax: +34 913941910e‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: marianosanz@odon.ucm.es</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:516C2FB1A7B12886A75853507CDA7F28DB770642</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02294.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/516C2FB1A7B12886A75853507CDA7F28DB770642/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002807</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002807</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Biological complications and peri‐implant clinical and radiographic changes at immediately placed dental implants. A prospective 5‐year cohort study</title><author><name sortKey="Rodrigo, Daniel" sort="Rodrigo, Daniel" uniqKey="Rodrigo D" first="Daniel" last="Rodrigo">Daniel Rodrigo</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Graduate Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology – University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Martin, Conchita" sort="Martin, Conchita" uniqKey="Martin C" first="Conchita" last="Martin">Conchita Martin</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>ETEP Research Group, Faculty of Odontology – University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sanz, Mariano" sort="Sanz, Mariano" uniqKey="Sanz M" first="Mariano" last="Sanz">Mariano Sanz</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Graduate Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology – University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>ETEP Research Group, Faculty of Odontology – University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Corresponding author:Facultad de OdontologíaUniversidad Complutense de MadridPlaza Ramón y Cajal28040 Madrid, SpainTel.: +34 913941901Fax: +34 913941910e‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: marianosanz@odon.ucm.es</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1224">1224</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1231">1231</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><date type="published" when="2012-10">2012-10</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Berglundh</term><term>Biological complications</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Buccal</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical outcome variables</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Clinical variables</term><term>Cohort</term><term>Complication</term><term>Consecutive patients</term><term>Crestal</term><term>Crestal bone changes</term><term>Density area</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Experimental study</term><term>Extraction</term><term>Extraction sockets</term><term>Fresh extraction sockets</term><term>Immediate implant</term><term>Immediate implant placement</term><term>Immediate implants</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant dentistry</term><term>Implant length</term><term>Implant level</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant surface</term><term>Implant survival</term><term>Implant therapy</term><term>Implantation</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>John wiley sons rodrigo</term><term>Lang</term><term>Lindhe</term><term>Madrid</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Mesial</term><term>Mesial aspect</term><term>Mucositis</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Periimplantitis</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Plaque index</term><term>Prospective cohort study</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic changes</term><term>Rodrigo</term><term>Same patients</term><term>Sanz</term><term>Socket</term><term>Soft tissues</term><term>Suppuration</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Tolerance method</term><term>Tooth extraction</term><term>Total agreement</term><term>Treatment groups</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Berglundh</term><term>Biological complications</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Buccal</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical outcome variables</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Clinical variables</term><term>Cohort</term><term>Complication</term><term>Consecutive patients</term><term>Crestal</term><term>Crestal bone changes</term><term>Density area</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Experimental study</term><term>Extraction</term><term>Extraction sockets</term><term>Fresh extraction sockets</term><term>Immediate implant</term><term>Immediate implant placement</term><term>Immediate implants</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant dentistry</term><term>Implant length</term><term>Implant level</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant surface</term><term>Implant survival</term><term>Implant therapy</term><term>Implantation</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>John wiley sons rodrigo</term><term>Lang</term><term>Lindhe</term><term>Madrid</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Mesial</term><term>Mesial aspect</term><term>Mucositis</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Periimplantitis</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Plaque index</term><term>Prospective cohort study</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic changes</term><term>Rodrigo</term><term>Same patients</term><term>Sanz</term><term>Socket</term><term>Soft tissues</term><term>Suppuration</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Tolerance method</term><term>Tooth extraction</term><term>Total agreement</term><term>Treatment groups</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">To evaluate clinically and radiographically immediate implants 5 years after insertion and to compare them with delayed‐placed implants in the same subjects</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>radiographic</json:string><json:string>biological complications</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>periodontology</json:string><json:string>crestal</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>mesial</json:string><json:string>sanz</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>rodrigo</json:string><json:string>suppuration</json:string><json:string>immediate implants</json:string><json:string>fresh extraction sockets</json:string><json:string>lindhe</json:string><json:string>clinical periodontology</json:string><json:string>berglundh</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>periimplantitis</json:string><json:string>impl</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>mucositis</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>cohort</json:string><json:string>buccal</json:string><json:string>plaque index</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>tooth extraction</json:string><json:string>implant level</json:string><json:string>extraction sockets</json:string><json:string>prospective cohort study</json:string><json:string>treatment groups</json:string><json:string>density area</json:string><json:string>implant surface</json:string><json:string>systematic review</json:string><json:string>immediate loading</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons rodrigo</json:string><json:string>total agreement</json:string><json:string>radiographic changes</json:string><json:string>soft tissues</json:string><json:string>clinical variables</json:string><json:string>same patients</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>complication</json:string><json:string>madrid</json:string><json:string>lang</json:string><json:string>implantation</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>tolerance method</json:string><json:string>immediate implant</json:string><json:string>implant survival</json:string><json:string>clinical outcome variables</json:string><json:string>implant length</json:string><json:string>consecutive patients</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>implant therapy</json:string><json:string>crestal bone changes</json:string><json:string>mesial aspect</json:string><json:string>immediate implant placement</json:string><json:string>experimental study</json:string><json:string>implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>extraction</json:string><json:string>socket</json:string><json:string>plaque</json:string><json:string>protocol</json:string><json:string>standard deviation</json:string><json:string>retrospective study</json:string><json:string>intergroup comparison</json:string><json:string>site level</json:string><json:string>year evaluation</json:string><json:string>immediate implants table</json:string><json:string>oral implants</json:string><json:string>cylindrical implants</json:string><json:string>more implants</json:string><json:string>radiographic bone loss</json:string><json:string>distal sites</json:string><json:string>radiographic measurements</json:string><json:string>implants method</json:string><json:string>maintenance visits</json:string><json:string>higher risk</json:string><json:string>implant stability</json:string><json:string>prosthetic restoration</json:string><json:string>immediate protocol</json:string><json:string>measurement errors</json:string><json:string>wide implants</json:string><json:string>different days</json:string><json:string>implant loading</json:string><json:string>aesthetic outcomes</json:string><json:string>higher tendency</json:string><json:string>clinical procedures</json:string><json:string>crestal bone loss</json:string><json:string>odontology university complutense</json:string><json:string>bone crestal changes</json:string><json:string>anterior maxilla</json:string><json:string>immediate implantation</json:string><json:string>critical review</json:string><json:string>ridge alterations</json:string><json:string>mariano sanz</json:string><json:string>distal aspect</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Daniel Rodrigo</name><affiliations><json:string>Graduate Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology – University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Conchita Martin</name><affiliations><json:string>ETEP Research Group, Faculty of Odontology – University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Mariano Sanz</name><affiliations><json:string>Graduate Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology – University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain</json:string><json:string>ETEP Research Group, Faculty of Odontology – University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain</json:string><json:string>Corresponding author:Facultad de OdontologíaUniversidad Complutense de MadridPlaza Ramón y Cajal28040 Madrid, SpainTel.: +34 913941901Fax: +34 913941910e‐mail:</json:string><json:string>E-mail: marianosanz@odon.ucm.es</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>biological complications</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>immediate implant</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>periimplantitis</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR2294</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-RJW5RSK4-G</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>To evaluate clinically and radiographically immediate implants 5 years after insertion and to compare them with delayed‐placed implants in the same subjects</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.252</score><pdfWordCount>6085</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>41085</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.7</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>21</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>156</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>3</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Biological complications and peri‐implant clinical and radiographic changes at immediately placed dental implants. A prospective 5‐year cohort study</title><pmid><json:string>22092726</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>23</volume><issue>10</issue><pages><first>1224</first><last>1231</last><total>8</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Original Article</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2000</json:string><json:string>5</json:string><json:string>1975</json:string><json:string>2011-07-25</json:string></date><geogName><json:string>San</json:string></geogName><orgName><json:string>Spain Conchita Martin, Mariano Sanz, ETEP Research Group, Faculty of Odontology</json:string><json:string>Spain Biological</json:string><json:string>The International Journal</json:string><json:string>Spain Tel</json:string><json:string>Rinn Corporation Elgin</json:string><json:string>University Complutense of Madrid</json:string><json:string>IBM Corporation</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Mariano Sanz</json:string><json:string>Daniel Rodrigo</json:string><json:string>Martin Mariano</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>IL</json:string><json:string>Somer</json:string><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>NY</json:string><json:string>Austria</json:string><json:string>Elgin</json:string><json:string>Helsinki</json:string><json:string>Madrid</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>Gothenburg</json:string><json:string>Vienna</json:string><json:string>Barcelona</json:string><json:string>Basel</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Spain</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Fransson et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>van Kesteren et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Paolantonio et al. 2001</json:string><json:string>Kourkouta et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Watzek et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Botticelli et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Esposito et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Vignoletti et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Ashman et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Sanz et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Shibly et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Covani et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Crespi et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Hammerle et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Araujo & Lindhe 2005</json:string><json:string>Botticelli et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Zitzmann & Berglundh 2008</json:string><json:string>Prosper et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Felice et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>AlvimPereira et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Tomasi et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Berglundh et al. (2002)</json:string><json:string>Branemark et al. (1983)</json:string><json:string>Renouard & Nisand 2006</json:string><json:string>Rodrigo et al</json:string><json:string>Caulier et al. (1997)</json:string><json:string>Ferrus et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Roos-Jansaker et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Luterbacher et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Blanco et al. 2011</json:string><json:string>Denissen et al. 1993</json:string><json:string>Roos-Jansaker 2007</json:string><json:string>Rodrigo et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Schwartz-Arad et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Kan et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Haffajee et al. 1983</json:string><json:string>Chen et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>De Rouk et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Strietzel et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Matarasso et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Wennstrom et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Fransson et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>De Boever et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Schropp et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Bragger (1998)</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Cooper et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Kesteren et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Evans & Chen 2008</json:string><json:string>Karoussis et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Lang et al. 2000</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-RJW5RSK4-G</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02294.x</json:string></doi><id>516C2FB1A7B12886A75853507CDA7F28DB770642</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/516C2FB1A7B12886A75853507CDA7F28DB770642/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/516C2FB1A7B12886A75853507CDA7F28DB770642/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/516C2FB1A7B12886A75853507CDA7F28DB770642/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Biological complications and peri‐implant clinical and radiographic changes at immediately placed dental implants. A prospective 5‐year cohort study</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Wiley Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><licence>© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2012-10"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Biological complications and peri‐implant clinical and radiographic changes at immediately placed dental implants. A prospective 5‐year cohort study</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Daniel</forename><surname>Rodrigo</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Graduate Periodontology</orgName><orgName>Faculty of Odontology – University Complutense of Madrid</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Madrid</settlement><country key="ES">Spain</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Conchita</forename><surname>Martin</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>ETEP Research Group</orgName><orgName>Faculty of Odontology – University Complutense of Madrid</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Madrid</settlement><country key="ES">Spain</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Mariano</forename><surname>Sanz</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Graduate Periodontology</orgName><orgName>Faculty of Odontology – University Complutense of Madrid</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Madrid</settlement><country key="ES">Spain</country></address></affiliation><affiliation><orgName>ETEP Research Group</orgName><orgName>Faculty of Odontology – University Complutense of Madrid</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Madrid</settlement><country key="ES">Spain</country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Corresponding author: Prof. Mariano Sanz Facultad de OdontologíaUniversidad Complutense de Madrid Plaza Ramón y Cajal 28040 Madrid, Spain Tel.: +34 913941901 Fax: +34 913941910 e‐mail: marianosanz@odon.ucm.es</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">516C2FB1A7B12886A75853507CDA7F28DB770642</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-RJW5RSK4-G</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02294.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR2294</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR2294.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2012.23.issue-10</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1224">1224</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1231">1231</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><date type="published" when="2012-10"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract style="main" xml:id="clr2294-abs-0001"><head>Abstract</head>
Objectives
<p>To evaluate clinically and radiographically immediate implants 5 years after insertion and to compare them with delayed‐placed implants in the same subjects</p>
Material and methods
<p>Twenty‐two consecutive patients that needed at least two implants for replacing hopeless teeth, one immediately upon extraction and the other in a delayed fashion (at least 4 months post‐extraction) were selected in this prospective cohort study. Post‐extraction immediate implants (<hi rend="fc">II</hi>) and delayed implants (<hi rend="fc">DI</hi>) groups were defined. One and 5 years after implant loading, clinical and radiographical outcome variables were recorded and analysed both at site and at implant level. Intra‐group and inter‐group comparisons were performed.</p>
Results
<p>The intergroup comparison did not show significant differences for plaque index, bleeding on probing and suppuration. These parameters worsen in both groups along the study. This trend was stronger for the plaque index in the group <hi rend="fc">II</hi>, which increased from 15.6% at 1 year to 25.9% at 5 years (<hi rend="italic">P</hi> < 0.04). One year after loading, the sites with probing depth ≥5 mm were higher for the group <hi rend="fc">II</hi> compared to <hi rend="fc">DI</hi> (2.5% vs. 0%; <hi rend="italic">P</hi> = 0.049). At the end of the study, no significant statistical differences were found. Radiographically, bone crestal changes did not yield significant differences. During the follow‐up period, 25% of the implants (26.4% in group <hi rend="fc">II</hi> and 23.5% in <hi rend="fc">DI</hi>) showed biological complications: mucositis (20%) and/or periimplantitis (5.8%). No differences between groups were found.</p>
Conclusions
<p>Within the same patients, the implants placed with the immediate protocol demonstrated a higher tendency to crestal bone loss and to peri‐implantitis, although these differences were not statistically significant.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords><term xml:id="clr2294-kwd-0001">biological complications</term><term xml:id="clr2294-kwd-0002">immediate implant</term><term xml:id="clr2294-kwd-0003">periimplantitis</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Original Article</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/516C2FB1A7B12886A75853507CDA7F28DB770642/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:id="clr2294" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title type="short">Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="10110"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2012.23.issue-10</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="23">23</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">10</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-10">October 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="160" status="forIssue" type="article"><doi>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02294.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR2294"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count number="8" type="pageTotal"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Original Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event date="2011-07-03" type="manuscriptAccepted"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2011-07-25" type="xmlCreated"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2011-08-17" type="xmlCorrected"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2011-08-18"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-08-18"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-09-18"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">1224</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">1231</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><lineatedText><line>Corresponding author:</line><line><i>Prof. Mariano Sanz</i></line><line>Facultad de Odontología</line><line>Universidad Complutense de Madrid</line><line>Plaza Ramón y Cajal</line><line>28040 Madrid, Spain</line><line>Tel.: +34 913941901</line><line>Fax: +34 913941910</line><line>e‐mail: <email>marianosanz@odon.ucm.es</email></line></lineatedText></correspondenceTo><selfCitationGroup><citation type="self" xml:id="clr2294-cit-0053"><author><familyName>Rodrigo</familyName> <givenNames>D</givenNames></author>, <author><familyName>Martin</familyName> <givenNames>C</givenNames></author>, <author><familyName>Sanz</familyName> <givenNames>M</givenNames></author> <articleTitle>Biological complications and peri-implant clinical and radiographic changes at immediately placed dental implants. A prospective 5-year cohort study</articleTitle>. <journalTitle>Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</journalTitle> <vol>00</vol> <pubYear year="2011">2011</pubYear>, <pageFirst>1</pageFirst>–<pageLast>8</pageLast>.
</citation></selfCitationGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR2294.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">Biological complications and peri‐implant clinical and radiographic changes at immediately placed dental implants. A prospective 5‐year cohort study</title><title type="shortAuthors">Rodrigo et al</title></titleGroup><creators><creator affiliationRef="#clr2294-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2294-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>Daniel</givenNames> <familyName>Rodrigo</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr2294-aff-0002" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2294-cr-0002"><personName><givenNames>Conchita</givenNames> <familyName>Martin</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr2294-aff-0001 #clr2294-aff-0002" corresponding="yes" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2294-cr-0003"><personName><givenNames>Mariano</givenNames> <familyName>Sanz</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation countryCode="ES" type="organization" xml:id="clr2294-aff-0001"><orgDiv>Graduate Periodontology</orgDiv> <orgName>Faculty of Odontology – University Complutense of Madrid</orgName> <address><city>Madrid</city> <country>Spain</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="ES" type="organization" xml:id="clr2294-aff-0002"><orgDiv>ETEP Research Group</orgDiv> <orgName>Faculty of Odontology – University Complutense of Madrid</orgName> <address><city>Madrid</city> <country>Spain</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="clr2294-kwd-0001">biological complications</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2294-kwd-0002">immediate implant</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2294-kwd-0003">periimplantitis</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:id="clr2294-abs-0001"><title type="main">Abstract</title><section xml:id="clr2294-sec-0001"><title type="main">Objectives</title><p>To evaluate clinically and radiographically immediate implants 5 years after insertion and to compare them with delayed‐placed implants in the same subjects</p></section><section xml:id="clr2294-sec-0002"><title type="main">Material and methods</title><p>Twenty‐two consecutive patients that needed at least two implants for replacing hopeless teeth, one immediately upon extraction and the other in a delayed fashion (at least 4 months post‐extraction) were selected in this prospective cohort study. Post‐extraction immediate implants (<fc>II</fc>) and delayed implants (<fc>DI</fc>) groups were defined. One and 5 years after implant loading, clinical and radiographical outcome variables were recorded and analysed both at site and at implant level. Intra‐group and inter‐group comparisons were performed.</p></section><section xml:id="clr2294-sec-0003"><title type="main">Results</title><p>The intergroup comparison did not show significant differences for plaque index, bleeding on probing and suppuration. These parameters worsen in both groups along the study. This trend was stronger for the plaque index in the group <fc>II</fc>, which increased from 15.6% at 1 year to 25.9% at 5 years (<i>P</i> < 0.04). One year after loading, the sites with probing depth ≥5 mm were higher for the group <fc>II</fc> compared to <fc>DI</fc> (2.5% vs. 0%; <i>P</i> = 0.049). At the end of the study, no significant statistical differences were found. Radiographically, bone crestal changes did not yield significant differences. During the follow‐up period, 25% of the implants (26.4% in group <fc>II</fc> and 23.5% in <fc>DI</fc>) showed biological complications: mucositis (20%) and/or periimplantitis (5.8%). No differences between groups were found.</p></section><section xml:id="clr2294-sec-0004"><title type="main">Conclusions</title><p>Within the same patients, the implants placed with the immediate protocol demonstrated a higher tendency to crestal bone loss and to peri‐implantitis, although these differences were not statistically significant.</p></section></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Biological complications and peri‐implant clinical and radiographic changes at immediately placed dental implants. A prospective 5‐year cohort study</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Biological complications and peri‐implant clinical and radiographic changes at immediately placed dental implants. A prospective 5‐year cohort study</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Daniel</namePart><namePart type="family">Rodrigo</namePart><affiliation>Graduate Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology – University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Conchita</namePart><namePart type="family">Martin</namePart><affiliation>ETEP Research Group, Faculty of Odontology – University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Mariano</namePart><namePart type="family">Sanz</namePart><affiliation>Graduate Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology – University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain</affiliation><affiliation>ETEP Research Group, Faculty of Odontology – University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain</affiliation><affiliation>Corresponding author:Facultad de OdontologíaUniversidad Complutense de MadridPlaza Ramón y Cajal28040 Madrid, SpainTel.: +34 913941901Fax: +34 913941910e‐mail:</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: marianosanz@odon.ucm.es</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-10</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2011-07-25</dateCreated><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2011-07-03</dateValid><edition>Rodrigo D, Martin C, Sanz M Biological complications and peri-implant clinical and radiographic changes at immediately placed dental implants. A prospective 5-year cohort study. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 00 2011, 1–8.</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract>To evaluate clinically and radiographically immediate implants 5 years after insertion and to compare them with delayed‐placed implants in the same subjects</abstract><abstract>Twenty‐two consecutive patients that needed at least two implants for replacing hopeless teeth, one immediately upon extraction and the other in a delayed fashion (at least 4 months post‐extraction) were selected in this prospective cohort study. Post‐extraction immediate implants (II) and delayed implants (DI) groups were defined. One and 5 years after implant loading, clinical and radiographical outcome variables were recorded and analysed both at site and at implant level. Intra‐group and inter‐group comparisons were performed.</abstract><abstract>The intergroup comparison did not show significant differences for plaque index, bleeding on probing and suppuration. These parameters worsen in both groups along the study. This trend was stronger for the plaque index in the group II, which increased from 15.6% at 1 year to 25.9% at 5 years (P < 0.04). One year after loading, the sites with probing depth ≥5 mm were higher for the group II compared to DI (2.5% vs. 0%; P = 0.049). At the end of the study, no significant statistical differences were found. Radiographically, bone crestal changes did not yield significant differences. During the follow‐up period, 25% of the implants (26.4% in group II and 23.5% in DI) showed biological complications: mucositis (20%) and/or periimplantitis (5.8%). No differences between groups were found.</abstract><abstract>Within the same patients, the implants placed with the immediate protocol demonstrated a higher tendency to crestal bone loss and to peri‐implantitis, although these differences were not statistically significant.</abstract><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>biological complications</topic><topic>immediate implant</topic><topic>periimplantitis</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Original Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>23</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>10</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>1224</start><end>1231</end><total>8</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">516C2FB1A7B12886A75853507CDA7F28DB770642</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-RJW5RSK4-G</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02294.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR2294</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/516C2FB1A7B12886A75853507CDA7F28DB770642/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002807 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002807 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:516C2FB1A7B12886A75853507CDA7F28DB770642
|texte= Biological complications and peri‐implant clinical and radiographic changes at immediately placed dental implants. A prospective 5‐year cohort study
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |