Clinical and radiographic study of implant treatment outcome in periodontally susceptible and non‐susceptible patients: a prospective long‐term study
Identifieur interne : 002579 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002578; suivant : 002580Clinical and radiographic study of implant treatment outcome in periodontally susceptible and non‐susceptible patients: a prospective long‐term study
Auteurs : Annemarie L. De Boever ; Marc Quirynen ; Wim Coucke ; Guy Theuniers ; Jan A. De BoeverSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2009-12.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Aggressive periodontitis, Augmentation, Bivariate analysis, Boever, Bone loss, Bone quality, Bone resorption, Chronic adult periodontitis, Clin, Clinical periodontology, Current smokers, Deluca zarb, Dental implants, Dentistry, Different groups, Distal side, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Former smokers, General health, Gent, Gent university, Health impairment, Health status, Healthy patients, Higher risk, Impairment, Impl, Implant, Implant failure, Implant installment, Implant loss, Implant placement, Implant surface, Implant survival, Implant survival rate, Implant therapy, Implant treatment, Implants research, International journal, Jemt, John wiley sons, Lang, Lekholm, Maintenance program, Marginal bone loss, Maxillofacial, Mengel, Mesial, Mesial side, More bone loss, Multiple regression analysis, Oral impl, Oral implants, Oral maxillofacial implants, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Partial dentures, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Periodontally, Periodontitis, Periodontology, Plaque, Plaque score, Present study, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Quirynen, Radiograph, Radiographic, Ridge augmentation, Risk factors, Smoker, Smoking habits, Suppl, Surface implants, Surface type, Survival curve, Survival rate, Systematic review, Systemic disease, Zarb.
- Teeft :
- Aggressive periodontitis, Augmentation, Bivariate analysis, Boever, Bone loss, Bone quality, Bone resorption, Chronic adult periodontitis, Clin, Clinical periodontology, Current smokers, Deluca zarb, Dental implants, Dentistry, Different groups, Distal side, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Former smokers, General health, Gent, Gent university, Health impairment, Health status, Healthy patients, Higher risk, Impairment, Impl, Implant, Implant failure, Implant installment, Implant loss, Implant placement, Implant surface, Implant survival, Implant survival rate, Implant therapy, Implant treatment, Implants research, International journal, Jemt, John wiley sons, Lang, Lekholm, Maintenance program, Marginal bone loss, Maxillofacial, Mengel, Mesial, Mesial side, More bone loss, Multiple regression analysis, Oral impl, Oral implants, Oral maxillofacial implants, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Partial dentures, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Periodontally, Periodontitis, Periodontology, Plaque, Plaque score, Present study, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Quirynen, Radiograph, Radiographic, Ridge augmentation, Risk factors, Smoker, Smoking habits, Suppl, Surface implants, Surface type, Survival curve, Survival rate, Systematic review, Systemic disease, Zarb.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the implant survival rate, periodontal and radiographic parameters of non‐submerged screw implants with two different surfaces (TPS and SLA) in periodontally non‐susceptible patients (NSP) and in patients with chronic adult periodontitis (CAP) or with generalized aggressive periodontitis (GAP).
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01750.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:4CE8FF62781CE489A87F113BA72410BCE7BF81F7Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Clinical and radiographic study of implant treatment outcome in periodontally susceptible and non‐susceptible patients: a prospective long‐term study</title><author><name sortKey="De Boever, Annemarie L" sort="De Boever, Annemarie L" uniqKey="De Boever A" first="Annemarie L." last="De Boever">Annemarie L. De Boever</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Former Department of Fixed Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gent University, Gent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Centre for Periodontology and Implantology, Oudenaarde, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, Marc" sort="Quirynen, Marc" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="Marc" last="Quirynen">Marc Quirynen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Coucke, Wim" sort="Coucke, Wim" uniqKey="Coucke W" first="Wim" last="Coucke">Wim Coucke</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Clinical Biology, Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Theuniers, Guy" sort="Theuniers, Guy" uniqKey="Theuniers G" first="Guy" last="Theuniers">Guy Theuniers</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gent University, Gent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Boever, Jan A" sort="De Boever, Jan A" uniqKey="De Boever J" first="Jan A." last="De Boever">Jan A. De Boever</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Former Department of Fixed Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gent University, Gent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:4CE8FF62781CE489A87F113BA72410BCE7BF81F7</idno><date when="2009" year="2009">2009</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01750.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/4CE8FF62781CE489A87F113BA72410BCE7BF81F7/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002579</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002579</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Clinical and radiographic study of implant treatment outcome in periodontally susceptible and non‐susceptible patients: a prospective long‐term study</title><author><name sortKey="De Boever, Annemarie L" sort="De Boever, Annemarie L" uniqKey="De Boever A" first="Annemarie L." last="De Boever">Annemarie L. De Boever</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Former Department of Fixed Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gent University, Gent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Centre for Periodontology and Implantology, Oudenaarde, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, Marc" sort="Quirynen, Marc" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="Marc" last="Quirynen">Marc Quirynen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Coucke, Wim" sort="Coucke, Wim" uniqKey="Coucke W" first="Wim" last="Coucke">Wim Coucke</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Clinical Biology, Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Theuniers, Guy" sort="Theuniers, Guy" uniqKey="Theuniers G" first="Guy" last="Theuniers">Guy Theuniers</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gent University, Gent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Boever, Jan A" sort="De Boever, Jan A" uniqKey="De Boever J" first="Jan A." last="De Boever">Jan A. De Boever</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Former Department of Fixed Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gent University, Gent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">20</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1341">1341</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1350">1350</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2009-12">2009-12</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aggressive periodontitis</term><term>Augmentation</term><term>Bivariate analysis</term><term>Boever</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone quality</term><term>Bone resorption</term><term>Chronic adult periodontitis</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Current smokers</term><term>Deluca zarb</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Different groups</term><term>Distal side</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Former smokers</term><term>General health</term><term>Gent</term><term>Gent university</term><term>Health impairment</term><term>Health status</term><term>Healthy patients</term><term>Higher risk</term><term>Impairment</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant installment</term><term>Implant loss</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant surface</term><term>Implant survival</term><term>Implant survival rate</term><term>Implant therapy</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>Jemt</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Lang</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Maintenance program</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Mengel</term><term>Mesial</term><term>Mesial side</term><term>More bone loss</term><term>Multiple regression analysis</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral implants</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Periodontally</term><term>Periodontitis</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Plaque</term><term>Plaque score</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Quirynen</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Ridge augmentation</term><term>Risk factors</term><term>Smoker</term><term>Smoking habits</term><term>Suppl</term><term>Surface implants</term><term>Surface type</term><term>Survival curve</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Systemic disease</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Aggressive periodontitis</term><term>Augmentation</term><term>Bivariate analysis</term><term>Boever</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone quality</term><term>Bone resorption</term><term>Chronic adult periodontitis</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Current smokers</term><term>Deluca zarb</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Different groups</term><term>Distal side</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Former smokers</term><term>General health</term><term>Gent</term><term>Gent university</term><term>Health impairment</term><term>Health status</term><term>Healthy patients</term><term>Higher risk</term><term>Impairment</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant installment</term><term>Implant loss</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant surface</term><term>Implant survival</term><term>Implant survival rate</term><term>Implant therapy</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>Jemt</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Lang</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Maintenance program</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Mengel</term><term>Mesial</term><term>Mesial side</term><term>More bone loss</term><term>Multiple regression analysis</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral implants</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Periodontally</term><term>Periodontitis</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Plaque</term><term>Plaque score</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Quirynen</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Ridge augmentation</term><term>Risk factors</term><term>Smoker</term><term>Smoking habits</term><term>Suppl</term><term>Surface implants</term><term>Surface type</term><term>Survival curve</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Systemic disease</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Objectives: To evaluate the implant survival rate, periodontal and radiographic parameters of non‐submerged screw implants with two different surfaces (TPS and SLA) in periodontally non‐susceptible patients (NSP) and in patients with chronic adult periodontitis (CAP) or with generalized aggressive periodontitis (GAP).</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>periodontitis</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>periodontal</json:string><json:string>periodontally</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>periodontology</json:string><json:string>zarb</json:string><json:string>smoker</json:string><json:string>mesial</json:string><json:string>implant survival</json:string><json:string>boever</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>lekholm</json:string><json:string>periodontal disease</json:string><json:string>quirynen</json:string><json:string>distal side</json:string><json:string>bone quality</json:string><json:string>augmentation</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>implant surface</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated</json:string><json:string>impl</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>suppl</json:string><json:string>mengel</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>radiographic</json:string><json:string>survival rate</json:string><json:string>multiple regression analysis</json:string><json:string>radiograph</json:string><json:string>current smokers</json:string><json:string>chronic adult periodontitis</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>healthy patients</json:string><json:string>jemt</json:string><json:string>gent</json:string><json:string>maintenance program</json:string><json:string>clinical periodontology</json:string><json:string>implant installment</json:string><json:string>smoking habits</json:string><json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>implant survival rate</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>implant loss</json:string><json:string>ridge augmentation</json:string><json:string>aggressive periodontitis</json:string><json:string>implant therapy</json:string><json:string>health impairment</json:string><json:string>mesial side</json:string><json:string>systematic review</json:string><json:string>implant treatment</json:string><json:string>survival curve</json:string><json:string>bone resorption</json:string><json:string>oral implants</json:string><json:string>implant failure</json:string><json:string>lang</json:string><json:string>plaque</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>partial dentures</json:string><json:string>risk factors</json:string><json:string>different groups</json:string><json:string>surface implants</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>impairment</json:string><json:string>higher risk</json:string><json:string>bivariate analysis</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>gent university</json:string><json:string>systemic disease</json:string><json:string>more bone loss</json:string><json:string>deluca zarb</json:string><json:string>surface type</json:string><json:string>plaque score</json:string><json:string>general health</json:string><json:string>former smokers</json:string><json:string>health status</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Annemarie L. De Boever</name><affiliations><json:string>Former Department of Fixed Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gent University, Gent, Belgium</json:string><json:string>Centre for Periodontology and Implantology, Oudenaarde, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Marc Quirynen</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Wim Coucke</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Clinical Biology, Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Guy Theuniers</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gent University, Gent, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Jan A. De Boever</name><affiliations><json:string>Former Department of Fixed Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gent University, Gent, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant survival</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>peri‐implantitis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>periodontitis</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR1750</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-7STR0NTS-M</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Objectives: To evaluate the implant survival rate, periodontal and radiographic parameters of non‐submerged screw implants with two different surfaces (TPS and SLA) in periodontally non‐susceptible patients (NSP) and in patients with chronic adult periodontitis (CAP) or with generalized aggressive periodontitis (GAP).</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>41</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>319</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount><score>7.492</score><pdfWordCount>8184</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>53578</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>Clinical and radiographic study of implant treatment outcome in periodontally susceptible and non‐susceptible patients: a prospective long‐term study</title><pmid><json:string>19793321</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>20</volume><issue>12</issue><pages><first>1341</first><last>1350</last><total>10</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2009</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>DDS – Department of Prosthodontics Gent University</json:string><json:string>Belgium Annemarie L</json:string><json:string>Belgium Marc Quirynen, Department of Periodontology, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium W</json:string><json:string>Department of Clinical Biology, Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium Guy Theuniers, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and Health</json:string><json:string>Gent University</json:string><json:string>De Pinte Belgium Tel</json:string><json:string>Belgium Correspondence</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Mrs E. Crommelynck</json:string><json:string>Zarb</json:string><json:string>Marc Quirynen</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Procedure</json:string><json:string>Annemarie L. De Boever</json:string><json:string>Table</json:string><json:string>Jansa</json:string><json:string>Jan A. De</json:string><json:string>Jan A. De Boever</json:string><json:string>Bivariate</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>IL</json:string><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Ulm</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>Chicago</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Leonhardt et al. (2002)</json:string><json:string>Lambrecht et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Pongnarisorns et al. (2007)</json:string><json:string>Ellegaard et al. 1997, 2006</json:string><json:string>Esposito et al. (1998)</json:string><json:string>Schwartz-Arrad et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Buser et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>McDermott et al. (2003)</json:string><json:string>Fransson et al. 1347</json:string><json:string>Van der Weyden et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Naert et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>De Boever et al</json:string><json:string>Jansson et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Gruicia et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Jemt 1993</json:string><json:string>Rosenberg et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Kourtis et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Mengel et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Hardt et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Weyant & Burt 1993</json:string><json:string>Roos-Jansa et al. (2001)</json:string><json:string>Berglundh et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>DeLuca et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Mengel et al. (2001)</json:string><json:string>Linden (2008)</json:string><json:string>Lambrecht et al. (2003)</json:string><json:string>Bryant & Zarb 1998</json:string><json:string>Knabe & Schendel 1997</json:string><json:string>Gruicia et al. (2004)</json:string><json:string>Susaria et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Aykent et al. (2007)</json:string><json:string>Wu & Chee 2007</json:string><json:string>Klokkevold & Han 2007</json:string><json:string>Schou et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. (2002)</json:string><json:string>Schou 2008</json:string><json:string>Wennstrom et al. (2004)</json:string><json:string>Jansson et al (2005)</json:string><json:string>Zarb 1993</json:string><json:string>Anitua et al. (2008)</json:string><json:string>DeLuca & Zarb 2006</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. (2007)</json:string><json:string>Mengel et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Karoussis et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Zarb (2006)</json:string><json:string>Mengel et al. (2007)</json:string><json:string>Persson et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Malo et al. (2007)</json:string><json:string>Wennstrom et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Lindquist et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Rocuzzo et al. (2008)</json:string><json:string>HolmPedersen et al. (2007)</json:string><json:string>Al-Zahrani 2008</json:string><json:string>Lang et al. (2000)</json:string><json:string>Hoffmann et al. (2007)</json:string><json:string>Mesa et al (2008)</json:string><json:string>Esposito et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Hultin et al. (2007)</json:string><json:string>Brocard et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Ong et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Cochran et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Hultin et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Fransson et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Karoussis et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 2001</json:string><json:string>Anitua et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Sbordone et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Evian et al. 2004</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-7STR0NTS-M</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2009</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2009</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01750.x</json:string></doi><id>4CE8FF62781CE489A87F113BA72410BCE7BF81F7</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4CE8FF62781CE489A87F113BA72410BCE7BF81F7/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4CE8FF62781CE489A87F113BA72410BCE7BF81F7/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/4CE8FF62781CE489A87F113BA72410BCE7BF81F7/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Clinical and radiographic study of implant treatment outcome in periodontally susceptible and non‐susceptible patients: a prospective long‐term study</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2009-12"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Clinical and radiographic study of implant treatment outcome in periodontally susceptible and non‐susceptible patients: a prospective long‐term study</title><title level="a" type="short">Implants in periodontally susceptible and healthy patients</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Annemarie L.</forename><surname>De Boever</surname></persName><affiliation>Former Department of Fixed Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gent University, Gent, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Centre for Periodontology and Implantology, Oudenaarde, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Marc</forename><surname>Quirynen</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Wim</forename><surname>Coucke</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Clinical Biology, Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Guy</forename><surname>Theuniers</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gent University, Gent, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Jan A.</forename><surname>De Boever</surname></persName><affiliation>Former Department of Fixed Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gent University, Gent, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">4CE8FF62781CE489A87F113BA72410BCE7BF81F7</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-7STR0NTS-M</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01750.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR1750</idno><idno type="supplier">1750</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR1750.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2009.20.issue-12</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">20</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1341">1341</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1350">1350</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2009-12"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p><hi rend="bold">Objectives: </hi> To evaluate the implant survival rate, periodontal and radiographic parameters of non‐submerged screw implants with two different surfaces (TPS and SLA) in periodontally non‐susceptible patients (NSP) and in patients with chronic adult periodontitis (CAP) or with generalized aggressive periodontitis (GAP).</p><p><hi rend="bold">Material and methods: </hi> In 110 healthy partially edentulous subjects, 68 patients with CAP and 16 patients with GAP, a total of 513 implants were installed and followed for on average 48.1±25.9 months. Only fixed partial dentures were used as suprastructures. All patients were offered a supportive periodontal maintenance program. Smoking habits, health impairment, plaque score, bleeding on probing (BOP), type of surface, bone score, bone loss on radiographs and the number of failed implants were noted.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi> Implant survival in the NSP and CAP group was 98% and 96% after 140 months (NS), but only 80% after 100 months in the GAP group (<hi rend="italic">P</hi>=0.0026). The overall rate of implant loss was 4.7%, but 15.25% in the GAP group (6/16 patients). The average marginal bone loss for all implants was 0.12±0.71 mm on the mesial side and 0.11±0.68 mm on the distal side. Bone loss/year was 0.08±0.31 and 0.07±0.3 mm in the NSP group, but 0.17±0.2 and 0.17±0.19 mm in the GAP group. Only in the GAP group, was bone loss significantly related to BOP, age, inflammation, presence of plaque, probing depth. Implants with a TPS surface had a lower survival than implants with an SLA surface (93% vs. 97%; <hi rend="italic">P</hi>=0.06), especially in the GAP group (80% vs. 83%; <hi rend="italic">P</hi>=0.005). Smoking habits had a significant influence on implant survival only in the GAP group (<hi rend="italic">P</hi>=0.07), declining in current smokers to 63%, and to 78% in former smokers. Overall, impaired general health had no significant influence (<hi rend="italic">P</hi>=0.85). However, impaired health further reduced implant survival in the GAP group (survival: 71%). In a statistical model to predict the chance for implant failing, only periodontal classification (<hi rend="italic">P</hi>=0.012) and implant surface type (<hi rend="italic">P</hi>=0.027) were significant.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion: </hi> Periodontally healthy patients and patients with CAP show no difference in peri‐implant variables and implant survival rate, but patients with GAP have more peri‐implant pathology, more marginal bone loss and a lower implant survival implant rate. SLA surface had a better prognosis than the TPS surface.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">implant survival</term><term xml:id="k2">implants</term><term xml:id="k3">peri‐implantitis</term><term xml:id="k4">periodontitis</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4CE8FF62781CE489A87F113BA72410BCE7BF81F7/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="12012"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2009.20.issue-12</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="20">20</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="12">12</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2009-12">December 2009</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="7" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01750.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR1750"></id><id type="supplier" value="1750"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="10"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2009-09-30"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2009-11-09"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="1341">1341</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="1350">1350</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><b>Correspondence to:</b>
<i>Jan A. De Boever</i>
Eeuwfeestlaan 34
B – 9840 De Pinte
Belgium
Tel.: +32 9 282 5827
Fax: +32 5 531 6308
e‐mail: <email normalForm="j.deboever@skynet.be">j.deboever@skynet.be</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR1750.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Date:</b> Accepted 13 April 2009</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="5"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="6"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="77"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="11265"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="79"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Clinical and radiographic study of implant treatment outcome in periodontally susceptible and non‐susceptible patients: a prospective long‐term study</title><title type="shortAuthors">De Boever et al.</title><title type="short">Implants in periodontally susceptible and healthy patients</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1 #a2"><personName><givenNames>Annemarie L.</givenNames><familyName>De Boever</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Marc</givenNames><familyName>Quirynen</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a4"><personName><givenNames>Wim</givenNames><familyName>Coucke</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a5"><personName><givenNames>Guy</givenNames><familyName>Theuniers</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Jan A.</givenNames><familyName>De Boever</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Former Department of Fixed Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gent University, Gent, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Centre for Periodontology and Implantology, Oudenaarde, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Clinical Biology, Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a5" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gent University, Gent, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">implant survival</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">peri‐implantitis</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">periodontitis</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p><b>Objectives: </b> To evaluate the implant survival rate, periodontal and radiographic parameters of non‐submerged screw implants with two different surfaces (TPS and SLA) in periodontally non‐susceptible patients (NSP) and in patients with chronic adult periodontitis (CAP) or with generalized aggressive periodontitis (GAP).</p><p><b>Material and methods: </b> In 110 healthy partially edentulous subjects, 68 patients with CAP and 16 patients with GAP, a total of 513 implants were installed and followed for on average 48.1±25.9 months. Only fixed partial dentures were used as suprastructures. All patients were offered a supportive periodontal maintenance program. Smoking habits, health impairment, plaque score, bleeding on probing (BOP), type of surface, bone score, bone loss on radiographs and the number of failed implants were noted.</p><p><b>Results: </b> Implant survival in the NSP and CAP group was 98% and 96% after 140 months (NS), but only 80% after 100 months in the GAP group (<i>P</i>=0.0026). The overall rate of implant loss was 4.7%, but 15.25% in the GAP group (6/16 patients). The average marginal bone loss for all implants was 0.12±0.71 mm on the mesial side and 0.11±0.68 mm on the distal side. Bone loss/year was 0.08±0.31 and 0.07±0.3 mm in the NSP group, but 0.17±0.2 and 0.17±0.19 mm in the GAP group. Only in the GAP group, was bone loss significantly related to BOP, age, inflammation, presence of plaque, probing depth. Implants with a TPS surface had a lower survival than implants with an SLA surface (93% vs. 97%; <i>P</i>=0.06), especially in the GAP group (80% vs. 83%; <i>P</i>=0.005). Smoking habits had a significant influence on implant survival only in the GAP group (<i>P</i>=0.07), declining in current smokers to 63%, and to 78% in former smokers. Overall, impaired general health had no significant influence (<i>P</i>=0.85). However, impaired health further reduced implant survival in the GAP group (survival: 71%). In a statistical model to predict the chance for implant failing, only periodontal classification (<i>P</i>=0.012) and implant surface type (<i>P</i>=0.027) were significant.</p><p><b>Conclusion: </b> Periodontally healthy patients and patients with CAP show no difference in peri‐implant variables and implant survival rate, but patients with GAP have more peri‐implant pathology, more marginal bone loss and a lower implant survival implant rate. SLA surface had a better prognosis than the TPS surface.</p><!--
To cite this article:
De Boever AL, Quirynen M, Coucke W, Theuniers G, De Boever JA. Clinical and radiographic study of implant treatment outcome in periodontally susceptible and non-susceptible patients: a prospective long-term study.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 20, 2009; 1341–1350.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01750.x
--></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Clinical and radiographic study of implant treatment outcome in periodontally susceptible and non‐susceptible patients: a prospective long‐term study</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Implants in periodontally susceptible and healthy patients</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Clinical and radiographic study of implant treatment outcome in periodontally susceptible and non‐susceptible patients: a prospective long‐term study</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Annemarie L.</namePart><namePart type="family">De Boever</namePart><affiliation>Former Department of Fixed Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gent University, Gent, Belgium</affiliation><affiliation>Centre for Periodontology and Implantology, Oudenaarde, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Marc</namePart><namePart type="family">Quirynen</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Wim</namePart><namePart type="family">Coucke</namePart><affiliation>Department of Clinical Biology, Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Guy</namePart><namePart type="family">Theuniers</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gent University, Gent, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Jan A.</namePart><namePart type="family">De Boever</namePart><affiliation>Former Department of Fixed Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gent University, Gent, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2009-12</dateIssued><edition>Date: Accepted 13 April 2009</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2009</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">5</extent><extent unit="tables">6</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">77</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">79</extent><extent unit="words">11265</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Objectives: To evaluate the implant survival rate, periodontal and radiographic parameters of non‐submerged screw implants with two different surfaces (TPS and SLA) in periodontally non‐susceptible patients (NSP) and in patients with chronic adult periodontitis (CAP) or with generalized aggressive periodontitis (GAP).</abstract><abstract>Material and methods: In 110 healthy partially edentulous subjects, 68 patients with CAP and 16 patients with GAP, a total of 513 implants were installed and followed for on average 48.1±25.9 months. Only fixed partial dentures were used as suprastructures. All patients were offered a supportive periodontal maintenance program. Smoking habits, health impairment, plaque score, bleeding on probing (BOP), type of surface, bone score, bone loss on radiographs and the number of failed implants were noted.</abstract><abstract>Results: Implant survival in the NSP and CAP group was 98% and 96% after 140 months (NS), but only 80% after 100 months in the GAP group (P=0.0026). The overall rate of implant loss was 4.7%, but 15.25% in the GAP group (6/16 patients). The average marginal bone loss for all implants was 0.12±0.71 mm on the mesial side and 0.11±0.68 mm on the distal side. Bone loss/year was 0.08±0.31 and 0.07±0.3 mm in the NSP group, but 0.17±0.2 and 0.17±0.19 mm in the GAP group. Only in the GAP group, was bone loss significantly related to BOP, age, inflammation, presence of plaque, probing depth. Implants with a TPS surface had a lower survival than implants with an SLA surface (93% vs. 97%; P=0.06), especially in the GAP group (80% vs. 83%; P=0.005). Smoking habits had a significant influence on implant survival only in the GAP group (P=0.07), declining in current smokers to 63%, and to 78% in former smokers. Overall, impaired general health had no significant influence (P=0.85). However, impaired health further reduced implant survival in the GAP group (survival: 71%). In a statistical model to predict the chance for implant failing, only periodontal classification (P=0.012) and implant surface type (P=0.027) were significant.</abstract><abstract>Conclusion: Periodontally healthy patients and patients with CAP show no difference in peri‐implant variables and implant survival rate, but patients with GAP have more peri‐implant pathology, more marginal bone loss and a lower implant survival implant rate. SLA surface had a better prognosis than the TPS surface.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>implant survival</topic><topic>implants</topic><topic>peri‐implantitis</topic><topic>periodontitis</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2009</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>20</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>12</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>1341</start><end>1350</end><total>10</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">4CE8FF62781CE489A87F113BA72410BCE7BF81F7</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-7STR0NTS-M</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01750.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR1750</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4CE8FF62781CE489A87F113BA72410BCE7BF81F7/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002579 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002579 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:4CE8FF62781CE489A87F113BA72410BCE7BF81F7
|texte= Clinical and radiographic study of implant treatment outcome in periodontally susceptible and non‐susceptible patients: a prospective long‐term study
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |