Single Implant Treatment in Healing versus Healed Sites of the Anterior Maxilla: A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation
Identifieur interne : 002476 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002475; suivant : 002477Single Implant Treatment in Healing versus Healed Sites of the Anterior Maxilla: A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation
Auteurs : Aryan Eghbali ; Hugo De Bruyn ; Tim De Rouck ; Roberto Cleymaet ; Iris Wyn ; Jan CosynSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2012-06.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Alveolar ridge, Analgesic therapy, Anterior maxilla, Astra, Astra tech, Bone level, Bone loss, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Clin periodontol, Clinical case, Clinical evaluation, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical outcome, Clinical parameters, Clinical response, Clinical study, Clinician, Complication, Conventional implant placement, Conventional placement group, Corresponding value, Cosyn, Cumulative percent, Daily practice, Dental school, Early implant placement, Early placement group, Free university, Half years, Healing abutment, Healing abutments, Healing sites, Health sciences, Implant, Implant collar, Implant diameter, Implant placement, Implant restorations, Implant shoulder, Implant sites, Implant surgery, Implant survival, Implant survival rate, Implant system, Implant treatment, Marginal bone levels, Maxilla, Maxillary, Natural teeth, Nobel biocare, Nobelreplace, Oral implantology, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated implants, Other hand, Other studies, Pearsson correlation, Periodontol, Plaque, Plaque levels, Plaque score, Porcelain fracture, Possible disparities, Premolar, Premolar position, Present study, Primary implant stability, Primary outcome, Prospective study, Provisional restorations, Radiographic, Radiographic examination, Radiographic outcome, Ranks test, Resorbed maxilla, Restoration material, Restorative procedures, Selection bias, Selection criteria, Single implant treatment, Single implants, Single maxillary, Single nobelreplace, Single tiunite, Single tooth implants, Soft tissue dimensions, Soft tissues, Standard deviation, Standard mucoperiosteal, Success criteria, Surgical procedure, Survival rates, Systematic review, Tapered implants, Technical complications, Tiunite, Tooth extraction, Tooth implants, Tooth loss, Tooth removal, Treatment outcome, Treatment strategy, Visible plaque.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Alveolar ridge, Analgesic therapy, Anterior maxilla, Astra, Astra tech, Bone level, Bone loss, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Clin periodontol, Clinical case, Clinical evaluation, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical outcome, Clinical parameters, Clinical response, Clinical study, Clinician, Complication, Conventional implant placement, Conventional placement group, Corresponding value, Cosyn, Cumulative percent, Daily practice, Dental school, Early implant placement, Early placement group, Free university, Half years, Healing abutment, Healing abutments, Healing sites, Health sciences, Implant, Implant collar, Implant diameter, Implant placement, Implant restorations, Implant shoulder, Implant sites, Implant surgery, Implant survival, Implant survival rate, Implant system, Implant treatment, Marginal bone levels, Maxilla, Maxillary, Natural teeth, Nobel biocare, Nobelreplace, Oral implantology, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated implants, Other hand, Other studies, Pearsson correlation, Periodontol, Plaque, Plaque levels, Plaque score, Porcelain fracture, Possible disparities, Premolar, Premolar position, Present study, Primary implant stability, Primary outcome, Prospective study, Provisional restorations, Radiographic, Radiographic examination, Radiographic outcome, Ranks test, Resorbed maxilla, Restoration material, Restorative procedures, Selection bias, Selection criteria, Single implant treatment, Single implants, Single maxillary, Single nobelreplace, Single tiunite, Single tooth implants, Soft tissue dimensions, Soft tissues, Standard deviation, Standard mucoperiosteal, Success criteria, Surgical procedure, Survival rates, Systematic review, Tapered implants, Technical complications, Tiunite, Tooth extraction, Tooth implants, Tooth loss, Tooth removal, Treatment outcome, Treatment strategy, Visible plaque.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim was to document the Nobelreplace tapered TiUnite® (Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden) implant system used by experienced clinicians in daily practice for replacing single maxillary anterior teeth and to compare the clinical and radiographic outcome between implants installed in healing sites (early implant placement) and fully healed sites (conventional implant placement) after on average two and a half years of function.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00283.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:4AC1739914D12BBF2BD18DBE784C47770F5FAC59Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Single Implant Treatment in Healing versus Healed Sites of the Anterior Maxilla: A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation</title><author><name sortKey="Eghbali, Aryan" sort="Eghbali, Aryan" uniqKey="Eghbali A" first="Aryan" last="Eghbali">Aryan Eghbali</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Ghent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Bruyn, Hugo" sort="De Bruyn, Hugo" uniqKey="De Bruyn H" first="Hugo" last="De Bruyn">Hugo De Bruyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Ghent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Rouck, Tim" sort="De Rouck, Tim" uniqKey="De Rouck T" first="Tim" last="De Rouck">Tim De Rouck</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Ghent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Department of Prosthodontics, Ghent, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Free University of Brussels (VUB), Dental Medicine, Brussels, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cleymaet, Roberto" sort="Cleymaet, Roberto" uniqKey="Cleymaet R" first="Roberto" last="Cleymaet">Roberto Cleymaet</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Free University of Brussels (VUB), Dental Medicine, Brussels, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wyn, Iris" sort="Wyn, Iris" uniqKey="Wyn I" first="Iris" last="Wyn">Iris Wyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Free University of Brussels (VUB), Dental Medicine, Brussels, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cosyn, Jan" sort="Cosyn, Jan" uniqKey="Cosyn J" first="Jan" last="Cosyn">Jan Cosyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Ghent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Free University of Brussels (VUB), Dental Medicine, Brussels, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: jan.cosyn@ugent.be</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:4AC1739914D12BBF2BD18DBE784C47770F5FAC59</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00283.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/4AC1739914D12BBF2BD18DBE784C47770F5FAC59/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002476</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002476</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Single Implant Treatment in Healing versus Healed Sites of the Anterior Maxilla: A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation</title><author><name sortKey="Eghbali, Aryan" sort="Eghbali, Aryan" uniqKey="Eghbali A" first="Aryan" last="Eghbali">Aryan Eghbali</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Ghent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Bruyn, Hugo" sort="De Bruyn, Hugo" uniqKey="De Bruyn H" first="Hugo" last="De Bruyn">Hugo De Bruyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Ghent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Rouck, Tim" sort="De Rouck, Tim" uniqKey="De Rouck T" first="Tim" last="De Rouck">Tim De Rouck</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Ghent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Department of Prosthodontics, Ghent, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Free University of Brussels (VUB), Dental Medicine, Brussels, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cleymaet, Roberto" sort="Cleymaet, Roberto" uniqKey="Cleymaet R" first="Roberto" last="Cleymaet">Roberto Cleymaet</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Free University of Brussels (VUB), Dental Medicine, Brussels, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wyn, Iris" sort="Wyn, Iris" uniqKey="Wyn I" first="Iris" last="Wyn">Iris Wyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Free University of Brussels (VUB), Dental Medicine, Brussels, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cosyn, Jan" sort="Cosyn, Jan" uniqKey="Cosyn J" first="Jan" last="Cosyn">Jan Cosyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Ghent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Free University of Brussels (VUB), Dental Medicine, Brussels, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: jan.cosyn@ugent.be</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="336">336</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="346">346</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">11</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-06">2012-06</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Alveolar ridge</term><term>Analgesic therapy</term><term>Anterior maxilla</term><term>Astra</term><term>Astra tech</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical case</term><term>Clinical evaluation</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical outcome</term><term>Clinical parameters</term><term>Clinical response</term><term>Clinical study</term><term>Clinician</term><term>Complication</term><term>Conventional implant placement</term><term>Conventional placement group</term><term>Corresponding value</term><term>Cosyn</term><term>Cumulative percent</term><term>Daily practice</term><term>Dental school</term><term>Early implant placement</term><term>Early placement group</term><term>Free university</term><term>Half years</term><term>Healing abutment</term><term>Healing abutments</term><term>Healing sites</term><term>Health sciences</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant collar</term><term>Implant diameter</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant restorations</term><term>Implant shoulder</term><term>Implant sites</term><term>Implant surgery</term><term>Implant survival</term><term>Implant survival rate</term><term>Implant system</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Marginal bone levels</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Nobelreplace</term><term>Oral implantology</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Other hand</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Pearsson correlation</term><term>Periodontol</term><term>Plaque</term><term>Plaque levels</term><term>Plaque score</term><term>Porcelain fracture</term><term>Possible disparities</term><term>Premolar</term><term>Premolar position</term><term>Present study</term><term>Primary implant stability</term><term>Primary outcome</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Provisional restorations</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic examination</term><term>Radiographic outcome</term><term>Ranks test</term><term>Resorbed maxilla</term><term>Restoration material</term><term>Restorative procedures</term><term>Selection bias</term><term>Selection criteria</term><term>Single implant treatment</term><term>Single implants</term><term>Single maxillary</term><term>Single nobelreplace</term><term>Single tiunite</term><term>Single tooth implants</term><term>Soft tissue dimensions</term><term>Soft tissues</term><term>Standard deviation</term><term>Standard mucoperiosteal</term><term>Success criteria</term><term>Surgical procedure</term><term>Survival rates</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Tapered implants</term><term>Technical complications</term><term>Tiunite</term><term>Tooth extraction</term><term>Tooth implants</term><term>Tooth loss</term><term>Tooth removal</term><term>Treatment outcome</term><term>Treatment strategy</term><term>Visible plaque</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Alveolar ridge</term><term>Analgesic therapy</term><term>Anterior maxilla</term><term>Astra</term><term>Astra tech</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical case</term><term>Clinical evaluation</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical outcome</term><term>Clinical parameters</term><term>Clinical response</term><term>Clinical study</term><term>Clinician</term><term>Complication</term><term>Conventional implant placement</term><term>Conventional placement group</term><term>Corresponding value</term><term>Cosyn</term><term>Cumulative percent</term><term>Daily practice</term><term>Dental school</term><term>Early implant placement</term><term>Early placement group</term><term>Free university</term><term>Half years</term><term>Healing abutment</term><term>Healing abutments</term><term>Healing sites</term><term>Health sciences</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant collar</term><term>Implant diameter</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant restorations</term><term>Implant shoulder</term><term>Implant sites</term><term>Implant surgery</term><term>Implant survival</term><term>Implant survival rate</term><term>Implant system</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Marginal bone levels</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Nobelreplace</term><term>Oral implantology</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Other hand</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Pearsson correlation</term><term>Periodontol</term><term>Plaque</term><term>Plaque levels</term><term>Plaque score</term><term>Porcelain fracture</term><term>Possible disparities</term><term>Premolar</term><term>Premolar position</term><term>Present study</term><term>Primary implant stability</term><term>Primary outcome</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Provisional restorations</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic examination</term><term>Radiographic outcome</term><term>Ranks test</term><term>Resorbed maxilla</term><term>Restoration material</term><term>Restorative procedures</term><term>Selection bias</term><term>Selection criteria</term><term>Single implant treatment</term><term>Single implants</term><term>Single maxillary</term><term>Single nobelreplace</term><term>Single tiunite</term><term>Single tooth implants</term><term>Soft tissue dimensions</term><term>Soft tissues</term><term>Standard deviation</term><term>Standard mucoperiosteal</term><term>Success criteria</term><term>Surgical procedure</term><term>Survival rates</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Tapered implants</term><term>Technical complications</term><term>Tiunite</term><term>Tooth extraction</term><term>Tooth implants</term><term>Tooth loss</term><term>Tooth removal</term><term>Treatment outcome</term><term>Treatment strategy</term><term>Visible plaque</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Purpose: The aim was to document the Nobelreplace tapered TiUnite® (Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden) implant system used by experienced clinicians in daily practice for replacing single maxillary anterior teeth and to compare the clinical and radiographic outcome between implants installed in healing sites (early implant placement) and fully healed sites (conventional implant placement) after on average two and a half years of function.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>conventional implant placement</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>anterior maxilla</json:string><json:string>tiunite</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>clinician</json:string><json:string>radiographic</json:string><json:string>nobelreplace</json:string><json:string>premolar</json:string><json:string>periodontol</json:string><json:string>maxillary</json:string><json:string>bone level</json:string><json:string>early implant placement</json:string><json:string>cosyn</json:string><json:string>implant survival</json:string><json:string>premolar position</json:string><json:string>implant system</json:string><json:string>systematic review</json:string><json:string>nobel biocare</json:string><json:string>clin implant dent relat</json:string><json:string>single implant treatment</json:string><json:string>clin periodontol</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>implant treatment</json:string><json:string>tooth loss</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>astra tech</json:string><json:string>natural teeth</json:string><json:string>implant shoulder</json:string><json:string>technical complications</json:string><json:string>daily practice</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>treatment outcome</json:string><json:string>ranks test</json:string><json:string>tooth removal</json:string><json:string>tooth extraction</json:string><json:string>half years</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>healing sites</json:string><json:string>astra</json:string><json:string>dental school</json:string><json:string>plaque levels</json:string><json:string>single maxillary</json:string><json:string>marginal bone levels</json:string><json:string>early placement group</json:string><json:string>primary outcome</json:string><json:string>conventional placement group</json:string><json:string>corresponding value</json:string><json:string>cumulative percent</json:string><json:string>single implants</json:string><json:string>other studies</json:string><json:string>implant sites</json:string><json:string>health sciences</json:string><json:string>free university</json:string><json:string>pearsson correlation</json:string><json:string>radiographic outcome</json:string><json:string>treatment strategy</json:string><json:string>plaque</json:string><json:string>complication</json:string><json:string>implant diameter</json:string><json:string>restoration material</json:string><json:string>clinical response</json:string><json:string>implant surgery</json:string><json:string>surgical procedure</json:string><json:string>clinical case</json:string><json:string>radiographic examination</json:string><json:string>analgesic therapy</json:string><json:string>standard mucoperiosteal</json:string><json:string>restorative procedures</json:string><json:string>implant survival rate</json:string><json:string>alveolar ridge</json:string><json:string>standard deviation</json:string><json:string>clinical parameters</json:string><json:string>primary implant stability</json:string><json:string>success criteria</json:string><json:string>clinical outcome</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>porcelain fracture</json:string><json:string>tapered implants</json:string><json:string>resorbed maxilla</json:string><json:string>survival rates</json:string><json:string>healing abutments</json:string><json:string>single tiunite</json:string><json:string>soft tissues</json:string><json:string>possible disparities</json:string><json:string>clinical evaluation</json:string><json:string>implant collar</json:string><json:string>other hand</json:string><json:string>oral implantology</json:string><json:string>provisional restorations</json:string><json:string>selection bias</json:string><json:string>clinical study</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>single nobelreplace</json:string><json:string>tooth implants</json:string><json:string>plaque score</json:string><json:string>soft tissue dimensions</json:string><json:string>visible plaque</json:string><json:string>single tooth implants</json:string><json:string>selection criteria</json:string><json:string>implant restorations</json:string><json:string>healing abutment</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Aryan Eghbali DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Ghent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent, Belgium;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Hugo De Bruyn DDS, MSc, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Ghent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent, Belgium;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Tim De Rouck DDS, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Ghent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Department of Prosthodontics, Ghent, Belgium;</json:string><json:string>Free University of Brussels (VUB), Dental Medicine, Brussels, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Roberto Cleymaet DDS, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Free University of Brussels (VUB), Dental Medicine, Brussels, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Iris Wyn DDS, MSc</name><affiliations><json:string>Free University of Brussels (VUB), Dental Medicine, Brussels, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Jan Cosyn DDS, MSc, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Ghent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent, Belgium;</json:string><json:string>Free University of Brussels (VUB), Dental Medicine, Brussels, Belgium</json:string><json:string>E-mail: jan.cosyn@ugent.be</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>conventional</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implant</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>early</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>single tooth</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID283</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-68NN23T9-W</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Purpose: The aim was to document the Nobelreplace tapered TiUnite® (Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden) implant system used by experienced clinicians in daily practice for replacing single maxillary anterior teeth and to compare the clinical and radiographic outcome between implants installed in healing sites (early implant placement) and fully healed sites (conventional implant placement) after on average two and a half years of function.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>63</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>440</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount><score>7.707</score><pdfWordCount>4951</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>32401</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>11</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>585 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>Single Implant Treatment in Healing versus Healed Sites of the Anterior Maxilla: A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation</title><pmid><json:string>20491818</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><pages><first>336</first><last>346</last><total>11</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2000</json:string><json:string>1975</json:string><json:string>2012</json:string><json:string>2006</json:string><json:string>2007</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</json:string><json:string>Free University</json:string><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>Department of Periodontology and Oral</json:string><json:string>University of Ghent</json:string><json:string>Belgium Reprint</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthodontics, Ghent, Belgium</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Jan Cosyn</json:string><json:string>Turkyilmaz</json:string><json:string>Selection</json:string><json:string>Hugo De Bruyn</json:string><json:string>Zarone</json:string><json:string>Buser</json:string><json:string>Cardaropoli</json:string><json:string>Schropp</json:string><json:string>Bruyn</json:string><json:string>Hartog</json:string><json:string>Clinic</json:string><json:string>Tim De Rouck</json:string><json:string>Iris Wyn</json:string><json:string>Palmer</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Ghent</json:string><json:string>Helsinki</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>America</json:string><json:string>Brussels</json:string><json:string>Basel</json:string><json:string>MA</json:string><json:string>Cambridge</json:string><json:string>Italy</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Belgium</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>June 2009</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-68NN23T9-W</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00283.x</json:string></doi><id>4AC1739914D12BBF2BD18DBE784C47770F5FAC59</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4AC1739914D12BBF2BD18DBE784C47770F5FAC59/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4AC1739914D12BBF2BD18DBE784C47770F5FAC59/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/4AC1739914D12BBF2BD18DBE784C47770F5FAC59/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Single Implant Treatment in Healing versus Healed Sites of the Anterior Maxilla: A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2012-06"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Single Implant Treatment in Healing versus Healed Sites of the Anterior Maxilla: A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation</title><title level="a" type="short">Early and Conventional Single Implants</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Aryan</forename><surname>Eghbali</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>University of Ghent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent, Belgium;<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Hugo</forename><surname>De Bruyn</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, MSc, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>University of Ghent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent, Belgium;<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Tim</forename><surname>De Rouck</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>University of Ghent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Department of Prosthodontics, Ghent, Belgium;<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Free University of Brussels (VUB), Dental Medicine, Brussels, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Roberto</forename><surname>Cleymaet</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Free University of Brussels (VUB), Dental Medicine, Brussels, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Iris</forename><surname>Wyn</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, MSc</roleName></persName><affiliation>Free University of Brussels (VUB), Dental Medicine, Brussels, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0005" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Jan</forename><surname>Cosyn</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, MSc, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>University of Ghent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent, Belgium;<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Free University of Brussels (VUB), Dental Medicine, Brussels, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Dr. Jan Cosyn, University of Ghent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, De Pintelaan 185, B‐9000 Ghent, Belgium; e‐mail: jan.cosyn@ugent.be</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">4AC1739914D12BBF2BD18DBE784C47770F5FAC59</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-68NN23T9-W</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00283.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID283</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID283.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2012.14.issue-3</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="336">336</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="346">346</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">11</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-06"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p><hi rend="bold">Purpose:</hi> The aim was to document the Nobelreplace tapered TiUnite® (Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden) implant system used by experienced clinicians in daily practice for replacing single maxillary anterior teeth and to compare the clinical and radiographic outcome between implants installed in healing sites (early implant placement) and fully healed sites (conventional implant placement) after on average two and a half years of function.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Material and Methods:</hi> A cross‐sectional study in patients who had been treated by two periodontists and two prosthodontists in 2006 and 2007 was conducted. Surgical treatment involved standard flap elevation without releasing incisions and restorative procedures included cemented crowns in all patients. Only straightforward single implant treatments in healing sites (6–8 weeks following tooth extraction) and fully‐healed sites (≥6 months following tooth extraction) were considered with both neighboring teeth present and without the need for hard and/or soft tissue grafting. Clinical and radiographic analyses of all implants were performed by a blinded clinician who had not been involved in the treatment.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results:</hi> Forty‐nine of the 53 eligible single implants (22 early and 27 conventionally placed implants) in 44/48 patients were available for scrutiny. There was no significant difference in implant survival between early (95%) and conventionally (93%) installed implants (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> = 1.000). Mean bone level to the implant‐abutment interface was 1.25 and 1.02 mm for early and conventional implant placement, respectively (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> = .220). In spite of fairly low plaque levels (26%), overall peri‐implant bleeding was quite prevalent (36%). Mean peri‐implant probing depth was 3.3 mm. Five restorations had experienced technical complications.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusions:</hi> Single Nobelreplace tapered TiUnite® implants installed in healing as well as in healed sites of the anterior maxilla are predictable. Both strategies seem equally successful in terms of implant survival, bone remodeling, clinical response, and risk for complications.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">conventional</term><term xml:id="k2">dental implant</term><term xml:id="k3">early</term><term xml:id="k4">single tooth</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>ARTICLES</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4AC1739914D12BBF2BD18DBE784C47770F5FAC59/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="06103"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.2012.14.issue-3</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="14">14</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="3">3</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-06">June 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="3" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00283.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID283"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="11"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-05-11"></event><event type="publishedOnlineAcceptedOrEarlyUnpaginated" date="2010-05-11"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.1.5 mode:FullText" date="2012-06-01"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-06-01"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="336">336</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="346">346</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Dr. Jan Cosyn, University of Ghent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, De Pintelaan 185, B‐9000 Ghent, Belgium; e‐mail: <email>jan.cosyn@ugent.be</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID283.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="4"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="2"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="28"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="5612"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Single Implant Treatment in Healing versus Healed Sites of the Anterior Maxilla: A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation</title><title type="shortAuthors">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Volume *, Number *, 2010</title><title type="short">Early and Conventional Single Implants</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Aryan</givenNames><familyName>Eghbali</familyName><degrees>DDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Hugo</givenNames><familyName>De Bruyn</familyName><degrees>DDS, MSc, PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a2 #a3"><personName><givenNames>Tim</givenNames><familyName>De Rouck</familyName><degrees>DDS, PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Roberto</givenNames><familyName>Cleymaet</familyName><degrees>DDS, PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Iris</givenNames><familyName>Wyn</familyName><degrees>DDS, MSc</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr6" affiliationRef="#a1 #a3" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Jan</givenNames><familyName>Cosyn</familyName><degrees>DDS, MSc, PhD</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>University of Ghent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent, Belgium;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>University of Ghent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Department of Prosthodontics, Ghent, Belgium;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Free University of Brussels (VUB), Dental Medicine, Brussels, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">conventional</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">dental implant</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">early</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">single tooth</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p><b>Purpose:</b> The aim was to document the Nobelreplace tapered TiUnite® (Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden) implant system used by experienced clinicians in daily practice for replacing single maxillary anterior teeth and to compare the clinical and radiographic outcome between implants installed in healing sites (early implant placement) and fully healed sites (conventional implant placement) after on average two and a half years of function.</p><p><b>Material and Methods:</b> A cross‐sectional study in patients who had been treated by two periodontists and two prosthodontists in 2006 and 2007 was conducted. Surgical treatment involved standard flap elevation without releasing incisions and restorative procedures included cemented crowns in all patients. Only straightforward single implant treatments in healing sites (6–8 weeks following tooth extraction) and fully‐healed sites (≥6 months following tooth extraction) were considered with both neighboring teeth present and without the need for hard and/or soft tissue grafting. Clinical and radiographic analyses of all implants were performed by a blinded clinician who had not been involved in the treatment.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Forty‐nine of the 53 eligible single implants (22 early and 27 conventionally placed implants) in 44/48 patients were available for scrutiny. There was no significant difference in implant survival between early (95%) and conventionally (93%) installed implants (<i>p</i> = 1.000). Mean bone level to the implant‐abutment interface was 1.25 and 1.02 mm for early and conventional implant placement, respectively (<i>p</i> = .220). In spite of fairly low plaque levels (26%), overall peri‐implant bleeding was quite prevalent (36%). Mean peri‐implant probing depth was 3.3 mm. Five restorations had experienced technical complications.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Single Nobelreplace tapered TiUnite® implants installed in healing as well as in healed sites of the anterior maxilla are predictable. Both strategies seem equally successful in terms of implant survival, bone remodeling, clinical response, and risk for complications.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Single Implant Treatment in Healing versus Healed Sites of the Anterior Maxilla: A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Early and Conventional Single Implants</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Single Implant Treatment in Healing versus Healed Sites of the Anterior Maxilla: A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Aryan</namePart><namePart type="family">Eghbali</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>University of Ghent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent, Belgium;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Hugo</namePart><namePart type="family">De Bruyn</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MSc, PhD</namePart><affiliation>University of Ghent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent, Belgium;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Tim</namePart><namePart type="family">De Rouck</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart><affiliation>University of Ghent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Department of Prosthodontics, Ghent, Belgium;</affiliation><affiliation>Free University of Brussels (VUB), Dental Medicine, Brussels, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Roberto</namePart><namePart type="family">Cleymaet</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart><affiliation>Free University of Brussels (VUB), Dental Medicine, Brussels, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Iris</namePart><namePart type="family">Wyn</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MSc</namePart><affiliation>Free University of Brussels (VUB), Dental Medicine, Brussels, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Jan</namePart><namePart type="family">Cosyn</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MSc, PhD</namePart><affiliation>University of Ghent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent, Belgium;</affiliation><affiliation>Free University of Brussels (VUB), Dental Medicine, Brussels, Belgium</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: jan.cosyn@ugent.be</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-06</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">4</extent><extent unit="tables">2</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">28</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">5612</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Purpose: The aim was to document the Nobelreplace tapered TiUnite® (Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden) implant system used by experienced clinicians in daily practice for replacing single maxillary anterior teeth and to compare the clinical and radiographic outcome between implants installed in healing sites (early implant placement) and fully healed sites (conventional implant placement) after on average two and a half years of function.</abstract><abstract>Material and Methods: A cross‐sectional study in patients who had been treated by two periodontists and two prosthodontists in 2006 and 2007 was conducted. Surgical treatment involved standard flap elevation without releasing incisions and restorative procedures included cemented crowns in all patients. Only straightforward single implant treatments in healing sites (6–8 weeks following tooth extraction) and fully‐healed sites (≥6 months following tooth extraction) were considered with both neighboring teeth present and without the need for hard and/or soft tissue grafting. Clinical and radiographic analyses of all implants were performed by a blinded clinician who had not been involved in the treatment.</abstract><abstract>Results: Forty‐nine of the 53 eligible single implants (22 early and 27 conventionally placed implants) in 44/48 patients were available for scrutiny. There was no significant difference in implant survival between early (95%) and conventionally (93%) installed implants (p = 1.000). Mean bone level to the implant‐abutment interface was 1.25 and 1.02 mm for early and conventional implant placement, respectively (p = .220). In spite of fairly low plaque levels (26%), overall peri‐implant bleeding was quite prevalent (36%). Mean peri‐implant probing depth was 3.3 mm. Five restorations had experienced technical complications.</abstract><abstract>Conclusions: Single Nobelreplace tapered TiUnite® implants installed in healing as well as in healed sites of the anterior maxilla are predictable. Both strategies seem equally successful in terms of implant survival, bone remodeling, clinical response, and risk for complications.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>conventional</topic><topic>dental implant</topic><topic>early</topic><topic>single tooth</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>14</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>336</start><end>346</end><total>11</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">4AC1739914D12BBF2BD18DBE784C47770F5FAC59</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-68NN23T9-W</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00283.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID283</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4AC1739914D12BBF2BD18DBE784C47770F5FAC59/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002476 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002476 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:4AC1739914D12BBF2BD18DBE784C47770F5FAC59
|texte= Single Implant Treatment in Healing versus Healed Sites of the Anterior Maxilla: A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |