Clinical and Microbiological Determinants of Ailing Dental Implants
Identifieur interne : 002427 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002426; suivant : 002428Clinical and Microbiological Determinants of Ailing Dental Implants
Auteurs : Giorgio Tabanella ; Hessam Nowzari ; Jorgen SlotsSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2009-03.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Actinomycetemcomitans, Bone loss, Campylobacter, Campylobacter species, Clin, Clin periodontol, Clinical implant dentistry, Dental implants, Dentistry, Denture, Determinant, Disease sites, Dura, Edentulous, Edentulous subjects, Forsythia, Fusobacterium, Fusobacterium species, Gingival, Gingival index, Gingivalis, Horizontal bone loss, Hybrid dentures, Implant, Implant failure, Implant placement, Implant sites, Implant threads, Intermedia, Lamina, Lekholm, Mandible, Maxilla, Microbial, Microbiological, Microbiota, Micros, Natural teeth, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral microbiol immunol, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Overdentures, Partial dentures, Peptostreptococcus micros, Periapical radiographs, Periimplant, Periimplant pocket depth, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Periodontitis, Periodontol, Periodontopathogens, Pocket depth, Postoperative radiograph, Present study, Radiograph, Radiographic, Radiographic crestal lamina dura, Radiographic lamina dura, Sdca, Smoking status, Southern california school, Study subjects.
- Teeft :
- Actinomycetemcomitans, Bone loss, Campylobacter, Campylobacter species, Clin, Clin periodontol, Clinical implant dentistry, Dental implants, Dentistry, Denture, Determinant, Disease sites, Dura, Edentulous, Edentulous subjects, Forsythia, Fusobacterium, Fusobacterium species, Gingival, Gingival index, Gingivalis, Horizontal bone loss, Hybrid dentures, Implant, Implant failure, Implant placement, Implant sites, Implant threads, Intermedia, Lamina, Lekholm, Mandible, Maxilla, Microbial, Microbiological, Microbiota, Micros, Natural teeth, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral microbiol immunol, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Overdentures, Partial dentures, Peptostreptococcus micros, Periapical radiographs, Periimplant, Periimplant pocket depth, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Periodontitis, Periodontol, Periodontopathogens, Pocket depth, Postoperative radiograph, Present study, Radiograph, Radiographic, Radiographic crestal lamina dura, Radiographic lamina dura, Sdca, Smoking status, Southern california school, Study subjects.
Abstract
Background: The failure of the host tissue to establish or maintain osseointegration around dental implants is due to either occlusal or parafunctional forces, premature loading, ill‐directed stress, or microbial infection. The long‐term failure rate of dental implants is generally 5–10%. Although a variety of etiologies of early peri‐implant bone loss (from implant placement to 1‐year post‐loading) have been proposed, factors associated with late implant failures are less well understood but are probably related to both the peri‐implant microbial environment and host factors. Discriminating between causes of implant failure is of importance for instituting a successful implant therapy.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00088.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:49C4071208AD2C703CF654E5F2B7D2E3433966ABLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Clinical and Microbiological Determinants of Ailing Dental Implants</title><author><name sortKey="Tabanella, Giorgio" sort="Tabanella, Giorgio" uniqKey="Tabanella G" first="Giorgio" last="Tabanella">Giorgio Tabanella</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Advanced periodontics, University of Southern California School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA, USA, and private practice, Rome, Italy;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nowzari, Hessam" sort="Nowzari, Hessam" uniqKey="Nowzari H" first="Hessam" last="Nowzari">Hessam Nowzari</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>program director, advanced periodontics, University of Southern California School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA, USA;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Slots, Jorgen" sort="Slots, Jorgen" uniqKey="Slots J" first="Jorgen" last="Slots">Jorgen Slots</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>professor of periodontology and microbiology, University of Southern California School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:49C4071208AD2C703CF654E5F2B7D2E3433966AB</idno><date when="2009" year="2009">2009</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00088.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/49C4071208AD2C703CF654E5F2B7D2E3433966AB/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002427</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002427</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Clinical and Microbiological Determinants of Ailing Dental Implants</title><author><name sortKey="Tabanella, Giorgio" sort="Tabanella, Giorgio" uniqKey="Tabanella G" first="Giorgio" last="Tabanella">Giorgio Tabanella</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Advanced periodontics, University of Southern California School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA, USA, and private practice, Rome, Italy;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nowzari, Hessam" sort="Nowzari, Hessam" uniqKey="Nowzari H" first="Hessam" last="Nowzari">Hessam Nowzari</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>program director, advanced periodontics, University of Southern California School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA, USA;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Slots, Jorgen" sort="Slots, Jorgen" uniqKey="Slots J" first="Jorgen" last="Slots">Jorgen Slots</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>professor of periodontology and microbiology, University of Southern California School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">11</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="24">24</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="36">36</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">13</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2009-03">2009-03</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Actinomycetemcomitans</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Campylobacter</term><term>Campylobacter species</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Determinant</term><term>Disease sites</term><term>Dura</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous subjects</term><term>Forsythia</term><term>Fusobacterium</term><term>Fusobacterium species</term><term>Gingival</term><term>Gingival index</term><term>Gingivalis</term><term>Horizontal bone loss</term><term>Hybrid dentures</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant sites</term><term>Implant threads</term><term>Intermedia</term><term>Lamina</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Microbial</term><term>Microbiological</term><term>Microbiota</term><term>Micros</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral microbiol immunol</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Peptostreptococcus micros</term><term>Periapical radiographs</term><term>Periimplant</term><term>Periimplant pocket depth</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Periodontitis</term><term>Periodontol</term><term>Periodontopathogens</term><term>Pocket depth</term><term>Postoperative radiograph</term><term>Present study</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic crestal lamina dura</term><term>Radiographic lamina dura</term><term>Sdca</term><term>Smoking status</term><term>Southern california school</term><term>Study subjects</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Actinomycetemcomitans</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Campylobacter</term><term>Campylobacter species</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Determinant</term><term>Disease sites</term><term>Dura</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous subjects</term><term>Forsythia</term><term>Fusobacterium</term><term>Fusobacterium species</term><term>Gingival</term><term>Gingival index</term><term>Gingivalis</term><term>Horizontal bone loss</term><term>Hybrid dentures</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant sites</term><term>Implant threads</term><term>Intermedia</term><term>Lamina</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Microbial</term><term>Microbiological</term><term>Microbiota</term><term>Micros</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral microbiol immunol</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Peptostreptococcus micros</term><term>Periapical radiographs</term><term>Periimplant</term><term>Periimplant pocket depth</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Periodontitis</term><term>Periodontol</term><term>Periodontopathogens</term><term>Pocket depth</term><term>Postoperative radiograph</term><term>Present study</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic crestal lamina dura</term><term>Radiographic lamina dura</term><term>Sdca</term><term>Smoking status</term><term>Southern california school</term><term>Study subjects</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Background: The failure of the host tissue to establish or maintain osseointegration around dental implants is due to either occlusal or parafunctional forces, premature loading, ill‐directed stress, or microbial infection. The long‐term failure rate of dental implants is generally 5–10%. Although a variety of etiologies of early peri‐implant bone loss (from implant placement to 1‐year post‐loading) have been proposed, factors associated with late implant failures are less well understood but are probably related to both the peri‐implant microbial environment and host factors. Discriminating between causes of implant failure is of importance for instituting a successful implant therapy.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>radiographic</json:string><json:string>micros</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>intermedia</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>campylobacter</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated</json:string><json:string>periodontal</json:string><json:string>forsythia</json:string><json:string>fusobacterium</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>periodontol</json:string><json:string>overdentures</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>dura</json:string><json:string>lamina</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>radiograph</json:string><json:string>gingivalis</json:string><json:string>sdca</json:string><json:string>gingival</json:string><json:string>microbiota</json:string><json:string>campylobacter species</json:string><json:string>periimplant</json:string><json:string>periodontitis</json:string><json:string>microbiological</json:string><json:string>pocket depth</json:string><json:string>periodontopathogens</json:string><json:string>fusobacterium species</json:string><json:string>clin periodontol</json:string><json:string>actinomycetemcomitans</json:string><json:string>lekholm</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>partial dentures</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>microbial</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>determinant</json:string><json:string>implant sites</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>oral microbiol immunol</json:string><json:string>natural teeth</json:string><json:string>edentulous subjects</json:string><json:string>periodontal disease</json:string><json:string>implant threads</json:string><json:string>study subjects</json:string><json:string>radiographic lamina dura</json:string><json:string>periapical radiographs</json:string><json:string>periimplant pocket depth</json:string><json:string>horizontal bone loss</json:string><json:string>postoperative radiograph</json:string><json:string>gingival index</json:string><json:string>radiographic crestal lamina dura</json:string><json:string>hybrid dentures</json:string><json:string>disease sites</json:string><json:string>implant failure</json:string><json:string>peptostreptococcus micros</json:string><json:string>southern california school</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>smoking status</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Giorgio Tabanella DDS, MS</name><affiliations><json:string>Advanced periodontics, University of Southern California School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA, USA, and private practice, Rome, Italy;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Hessam Nowzari DDS, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>program director, advanced periodontics, University of Southern California School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA, USA;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Jorgen Slots DDS, DMD, MS, PhD, MBA</name><affiliations><json:string>professor of periodontology and microbiology, University of Southern California School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>oral implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>peri‐implant bone loss</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>peri‐implantitis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>peri‐implant tissue</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>predictors of ailing dental implants</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID088</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-ZZM45MCB-B</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Background: The failure of the host tissue to establish or maintain osseointegration around dental implants is due to either occlusal or parafunctional forces, premature loading, ill‐directed stress, or microbial infection. The long‐term failure rate of dental implants is generally 5–10%. Although a variety of etiologies of early peri‐implant bone loss (from implant placement to 1‐year post‐loading) have been proposed, factors associated with late implant failures are less well understood but are probably related to both the peri‐implant microbial environment and host factors. Discriminating between causes of implant failure is of importance for instituting a successful implant therapy.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.561</score><pdfWordCount>4397</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>32822</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>13</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>585 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>97</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>695</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Clinical and Microbiological Determinants of Ailing Dental Implants</title><pmid><json:string>18384407</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>24</first><last>36</last><total>13</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2009</json:string><json:string>2002</json:string></date><geogName><json:string>Beach Gardens</json:string></geogName><orgName><json:string>Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</json:string><json:string>Coy Laboratory Products, Ann Arbor</json:string><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>Implant Innovations Inc.</json:string><json:string>University of Southern California</json:string><json:string>BBL Microbiology Systems</json:string><json:string>University of Southern California School of Dentistry, Los Angeles</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Alcoforado</json:string><json:string>The</json:string><json:string>Winston Chee</json:string><json:string>Overdentures</json:string><json:string>Placement</json:string><json:string>Mombelli</json:string><json:string>Giorgio Tabanella</json:string><json:string>Rosenberg</json:string><json:string>Leonhardt</json:string><json:string>Via Delle</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>IL</json:string><json:string>Rochester</json:string><json:string>NY</json:string><json:string>Windsor</json:string><json:string>Cockeysville</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>MD</json:string><json:string>Rome</json:string><json:string>Chicago</json:string><json:string>France</json:string><json:string>Italy</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-ZZM45MCB-B</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2009</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2009</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00088.x</json:string></doi><id>49C4071208AD2C703CF654E5F2B7D2E3433966AB</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/49C4071208AD2C703CF654E5F2B7D2E3433966AB/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/49C4071208AD2C703CF654E5F2B7D2E3433966AB/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/49C4071208AD2C703CF654E5F2B7D2E3433966AB/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Clinical and Microbiological Determinants of Ailing Dental Implants</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2008, Copyright the Authors. Journal Compilation © 2008,Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2009-03"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Clinical and Microbiological Determinants of Ailing Dental Implants</title><title level="a" type="short">Determinants of Ailing Implants</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Giorgio</forename><surname>Tabanella</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, MS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Advanced periodontics, University of Southern California School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA, USA, and private practice, Rome, Italy;<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Hessam</forename><surname>Nowzari</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>program director, advanced periodontics, University of Southern California School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA, USA;<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Jorgen</forename><surname>Slots</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, DMD, MS, PhD, MBA</roleName></persName><affiliation>professor of periodontology and microbiology, University of Southern California School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA, USA<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">49C4071208AD2C703CF654E5F2B7D2E3433966AB</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-ZZM45MCB-B</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00088.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID088</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID088.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2009.11.issue-1</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">11</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="24">24</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="36">36</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">13</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2009-03"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p><hi rend="bold">Background:</hi> The failure of the host tissue to establish or maintain osseointegration around dental implants is due to either occlusal or parafunctional forces, premature loading, ill‐directed stress, or microbial infection. The long‐term failure rate of dental implants is generally 5–10%. Although a variety of etiologies of early peri‐implant bone loss (from implant placement to 1‐year post‐loading) have been proposed, factors associated with late implant failures are less well understood but are probably related to both the peri‐implant microbial environment and host factors. Discriminating between causes of implant failure is of importance for instituting a successful implant therapy.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Purpose:</hi> The objective of this cross‐sectional split‐mouth study was to identify clinical, radiographic, and bacterial characteristics of peri‐implant disease sites.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and Methods:</hi> Fifteen patients with bilateral implants (Brånemark®, Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden; and 3i™ implant systems, Implant Innovations Inc., Palm Beach Gardens, FL, USA) participated in the study. Sites with peri‐implantitis (radiographic bone loss beyond the third implant thread) and peri‐implant healthy tissues (radiographic bone level above the first implant thread) were identified in periapical radiographs using a long‐cone paralleling projection technique. Microbiological identification was carried out using established anaerobic culture techniques. A descriptive statistics based on means and standard deviations was reported.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results:</hi> Peri‐implant bone loss was associated with the absence of radiographic crestal lamina dura, peri‐implant pocket depth, pain on chewing, and the submucosal presence of the putative periodontopathogens <hi rend="italic">Tannerella forsythia</hi>, <hi rend="italic">Campylobacter</hi> species, and <hi rend="italic">Peptostreptococcus micros</hi>. Pain was associated with <hi rend="italic">P. micros</hi>, <hi rend="italic">Fusobacterium</hi> species, and <hi rend="italic">Eubacterium</hi> species.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Discussion and Conclusion:</hi> The absence of radiographic crestal lamina dura and the presence of suspected major periodontal pathogens seem to be associated to peri‐implantitis.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">oral implants</term><term xml:id="k2">peri‐implant bone loss</term><term xml:id="k3">peri‐implantitis</term><term xml:id="k4">peri‐implant tissue</term><term xml:id="k5">predictors of ailing dental implants</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>ARTICLES</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/49C4071208AD2C703CF654E5F2B7D2E3433966AB/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="03001"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.2009.11.issue-1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="11">11</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2009-03">March 2009</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="3" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00088.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID088"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="13"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2008, Copyright the Authors. Journal Compilation © 2008,Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2008-04-01"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2009-02-09"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.5 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-04-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="24">24</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="36">36</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Giorgio Tabanella, Via Delle Isole 9 Int. 4, 00198 Rome, Italy; e‐mail: <email>giorgio.tabanella@usc.edu</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID088.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="6"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="3"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="46"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="5547"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Clinical and Microbiological Determinants of Ailing Dental Implants</title><title type="shortAuthors">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Volume *, Number *</title><title type="short">Determinants of Ailing Implants</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Giorgio</givenNames><familyName>Tabanella</familyName><degrees>DDS, MS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Hessam</givenNames><familyName>Nowzari</familyName><degrees>DDS, PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Jorgen</givenNames><familyName>Slots</familyName><degrees>DDS, DMD, MS, PhD, MBA</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Advanced periodontics, University of Southern California School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA, USA, and private practice, Rome, Italy;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>program director, advanced periodontics, University of Southern California School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA, USA;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>professor of periodontology and microbiology, University of Southern California School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA, USA</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">oral implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">peri‐implant bone loss</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">peri‐implantitis</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">peri‐implant tissue</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">predictors of ailing dental implants</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p><b>Background:</b> The failure of the host tissue to establish or maintain osseointegration around dental implants is due to either occlusal or parafunctional forces, premature loading, ill‐directed stress, or microbial infection. The long‐term failure rate of dental implants is generally 5–10%. Although a variety of etiologies of early peri‐implant bone loss (from implant placement to 1‐year post‐loading) have been proposed, factors associated with late implant failures are less well understood but are probably related to both the peri‐implant microbial environment and host factors. Discriminating between causes of implant failure is of importance for instituting a successful implant therapy.</p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The objective of this cross‐sectional split‐mouth study was to identify clinical, radiographic, and bacterial characteristics of peri‐implant disease sites.</p><p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> Fifteen patients with bilateral implants (Brånemark®, Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden; and 3i™ implant systems, Implant Innovations Inc., Palm Beach Gardens, FL, USA) participated in the study. Sites with peri‐implantitis (radiographic bone loss beyond the third implant thread) and peri‐implant healthy tissues (radiographic bone level above the first implant thread) were identified in periapical radiographs using a long‐cone paralleling projection technique. Microbiological identification was carried out using established anaerobic culture techniques. A descriptive statistics based on means and standard deviations was reported.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Peri‐implant bone loss was associated with the absence of radiographic crestal lamina dura, peri‐implant pocket depth, pain on chewing, and the submucosal presence of the putative periodontopathogens <i>Tannerella forsythia</i>, <i>Campylobacter</i> species, and <i>Peptostreptococcus micros</i>. Pain was associated with <i>P. micros</i>, <i>Fusobacterium</i> species, and <i>Eubacterium</i> species.</p><p><b>Discussion and Conclusion:</b> The absence of radiographic crestal lamina dura and the presence of suspected major periodontal pathogens seem to be associated to peri‐implantitis.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Clinical and Microbiological Determinants of Ailing Dental Implants</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Determinants of Ailing Implants</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Clinical and Microbiological Determinants of Ailing Dental Implants</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Giorgio</namePart><namePart type="family">Tabanella</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MS</namePart><affiliation>Advanced periodontics, University of Southern California School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA, USA, and private practice, Rome, Italy;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Hessam</namePart><namePart type="family">Nowzari</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart><affiliation>program director, advanced periodontics, University of Southern California School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA, USA;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Jorgen</namePart><namePart type="family">Slots</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, DMD, MS, PhD, MBA</namePart><affiliation>professor of periodontology and microbiology, University of Southern California School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2009-03</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2009</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">6</extent><extent unit="tables">3</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">46</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">5547</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Background: The failure of the host tissue to establish or maintain osseointegration around dental implants is due to either occlusal or parafunctional forces, premature loading, ill‐directed stress, or microbial infection. The long‐term failure rate of dental implants is generally 5–10%. Although a variety of etiologies of early peri‐implant bone loss (from implant placement to 1‐year post‐loading) have been proposed, factors associated with late implant failures are less well understood but are probably related to both the peri‐implant microbial environment and host factors. Discriminating between causes of implant failure is of importance for instituting a successful implant therapy.</abstract><abstract>Purpose: The objective of this cross‐sectional split‐mouth study was to identify clinical, radiographic, and bacterial characteristics of peri‐implant disease sites.</abstract><abstract>Materials and Methods: Fifteen patients with bilateral implants (Brånemark®, Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden; and 3i™ implant systems, Implant Innovations Inc., Palm Beach Gardens, FL, USA) participated in the study. Sites with peri‐implantitis (radiographic bone loss beyond the third implant thread) and peri‐implant healthy tissues (radiographic bone level above the first implant thread) were identified in periapical radiographs using a long‐cone paralleling projection technique. Microbiological identification was carried out using established anaerobic culture techniques. A descriptive statistics based on means and standard deviations was reported.</abstract><abstract>Results: Peri‐implant bone loss was associated with the absence of radiographic crestal lamina dura, peri‐implant pocket depth, pain on chewing, and the submucosal presence of the putative periodontopathogens Tannerella forsythia, Campylobacter species, and Peptostreptococcus micros. Pain was associated with P. micros, Fusobacterium species, and Eubacterium species.</abstract><abstract>Discussion and Conclusion: The absence of radiographic crestal lamina dura and the presence of suspected major periodontal pathogens seem to be associated to peri‐implantitis.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>oral implants</topic><topic>peri‐implant bone loss</topic><topic>peri‐implantitis</topic><topic>peri‐implant tissue</topic><topic>predictors of ailing dental implants</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2009</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>11</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>24</start><end>36</end><total>13</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">49C4071208AD2C703CF654E5F2B7D2E3433966AB</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-ZZM45MCB-B</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00088.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID088</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2008, Copyright the Authors. Journal Compilation © 2008,Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/49C4071208AD2C703CF654E5F2B7D2E3433966AB/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002427 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002427 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:49C4071208AD2C703CF654E5F2B7D2E3433966AB
|texte= Clinical and Microbiological Determinants of Ailing Dental Implants
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |