The Effect of Smoking on Early Bone Remodeling on Surface Modified Southern Implants®
Identifieur interne : 002216 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002215; suivant : 002217The Effect of Smoking on Early Bone Remodeling on Surface Modified Southern Implants®
Auteurs : Stefan Vandeweghe ; Hugo De BruynSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2011-09.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment connection, Bone level, Bone loss, Bone quality, Bruyn, Cigarette smoking, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Clin periodontol, Clinical implant dentistry, Dent, Dental implants, Dental school, Early bone, Early implant failure, Edentulous, Exact test, Failure rate, Function time, Health sciences, Implant, Implant failure, Implant failures, Implant survival, Implant treatment, Interproximal bone level, Mandible, Marginal bone loss, Maxilla, Maxillofac, More bone loss, Nonsmoker, Oral implantology, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral maxillofac surg, Patient level, Periodontol, Present study, Prospective study, Radiograph, Relat, Risk factors, Rough surface implants, Smoker, Smoking, Southern implants, Success rate, Surface implants, Survival rate.
- Teeft :
- Abutment connection, Bone level, Bone loss, Bone quality, Bruyn, Cigarette smoking, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Clin periodontol, Clinical implant dentistry, Dent, Dental implants, Dental school, Early bone, Early implant failure, Edentulous, Exact test, Failure rate, Function time, Health sciences, Implant, Implant failure, Implant failures, Implant survival, Implant treatment, Interproximal bone level, Mandible, Marginal bone loss, Maxilla, Maxillofac, More bone loss, Nonsmoker, Oral implantology, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral maxillofac surg, Patient level, Periodontol, Present study, Prospective study, Radiograph, Relat, Risk factors, Rough surface implants, Smoker, Smoking, Southern implants, Success rate, Surface implants, Survival rate.
Abstract
Introduction: Smoking affects the survival of turned titanium implants. Although smoking has less impact on the failure rate of rough surface implants, the effect on bone loss on rough surface implants has not been studied yet and may be an important factor in biological stability.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00198.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:45CCFADB01D158F351CD73E4259F700C0D73CA82Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The Effect of Smoking on Early Bone Remodeling on Surface Modified Southern Implants®</title><author><name sortKey="Vandeweghe, Stefan" sort="Vandeweghe, Stefan" uniqKey="Vandeweghe S" first="Stefan" last="Vandeweghe">Stefan Vandeweghe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dentist, PhD student, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Bruyn, Hugo" sort="De Bruyn, Hugo" uniqKey="De Bruyn H" first="Hugo" last="De Bruyn">Hugo De Bruyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>professor and chairman, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: hugo.debruyn@ugent.be</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:45CCFADB01D158F351CD73E4259F700C0D73CA82</idno><date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00198.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/45CCFADB01D158F351CD73E4259F700C0D73CA82/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002216</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002216</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The Effect of Smoking on Early Bone Remodeling on Surface Modified Southern Implants®</title><author><name sortKey="Vandeweghe, Stefan" sort="Vandeweghe, Stefan" uniqKey="Vandeweghe S" first="Stefan" last="Vandeweghe">Stefan Vandeweghe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dentist, PhD student, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Bruyn, Hugo" sort="De Bruyn, Hugo" uniqKey="De Bruyn H" first="Hugo" last="De Bruyn">Hugo De Bruyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>professor and chairman, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: hugo.debruyn@ugent.be</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">13</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="206">206</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="214">214</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-09">2011-09</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone quality</term><term>Bruyn</term><term>Cigarette smoking</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental school</term><term>Early bone</term><term>Early implant failure</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Exact test</term><term>Failure rate</term><term>Function time</term><term>Health sciences</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant failures</term><term>Implant survival</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Interproximal bone level</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>More bone loss</term><term>Nonsmoker</term><term>Oral implantology</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral maxillofac surg</term><term>Patient level</term><term>Periodontol</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Relat</term><term>Risk factors</term><term>Rough surface implants</term><term>Smoker</term><term>Smoking</term><term>Southern implants</term><term>Success rate</term><term>Surface implants</term><term>Survival rate</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone quality</term><term>Bruyn</term><term>Cigarette smoking</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental school</term><term>Early bone</term><term>Early implant failure</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Exact test</term><term>Failure rate</term><term>Function time</term><term>Health sciences</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant failures</term><term>Implant survival</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Interproximal bone level</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>More bone loss</term><term>Nonsmoker</term><term>Oral implantology</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral maxillofac surg</term><term>Patient level</term><term>Periodontol</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Relat</term><term>Risk factors</term><term>Rough surface implants</term><term>Smoker</term><term>Smoking</term><term>Southern implants</term><term>Success rate</term><term>Surface implants</term><term>Survival rate</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Introduction: Smoking affects the survival of turned titanium implants. Although smoking has less impact on the failure rate of rough surface implants, the effect on bone loss on rough surface implants has not been studied yet and may be an important factor in biological stability.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>smoker</json:string><json:string>nonsmoker</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>radiograph</json:string><json:string>periodontol</json:string><json:string>maxillofac</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>bone level</json:string><json:string>relat</json:string><json:string>bruyn</json:string><json:string>clin implant dent relat</json:string><json:string>southern implants</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>early bone</json:string><json:string>cigarette smoking</json:string><json:string>implant survival</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>function time</json:string><json:string>implant failures</json:string><json:string>surface implants</json:string><json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>risk factors</json:string><json:string>failure rate</json:string><json:string>survival rate</json:string><json:string>patient level</json:string><json:string>bone quality</json:string><json:string>abutment connection</json:string><json:string>implant failure</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>clin periodontol</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>more bone loss</json:string><json:string>rough surface implants</json:string><json:string>implant treatment</json:string><json:string>dental school</json:string><json:string>oral implantology</json:string><json:string>early implant failure</json:string><json:string>health sciences</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac surg</json:string><json:string>interproximal bone level</json:string><json:string>exact test</json:string><json:string>success rate</json:string><json:string>smoking</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Stefan Vandeweghe DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Dentist, PhD student, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Hugo De Bruyn DDS, MSc, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>professor and chairman, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium</json:string><json:string>E-mail: hugo.debruyn@ugent.be</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bone loss</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implant</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant success</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant survival</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>modified surface</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>smoking</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Southern Implants®</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID198</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-GZHM6TH0-8</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Introduction: Smoking affects the survival of turned titanium implants. Although smoking has less impact on the failure rate of rough surface implants, the effect on bone loss on rough surface implants has not been studied yet and may be an important factor in biological stability.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.019</score><pdfWordCount>4479</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>28933</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>585 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>45</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>282</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>7</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>The Effect of Smoking on Early Bone Remodeling on Surface Modified Southern Implants®</title><pmid><json:string>19744200</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><pages><first>206</first><last>214</last><total>9</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2011</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</json:string><json:string>SPSS Inc., Chicago</json:string><json:string>Health Institute of Public Health</json:string><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>Department of Periodontology and Oral</json:string><json:string>University of Ghent</json:string><json:string>Belgium Reprint</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Distribution</json:string><json:string>Kourtis</json:string><json:string>Hugo De Bruyn</json:string><json:string>Åstrand</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Ghent</json:string><json:string>South Africa</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Zurich</json:string><json:string>Belgium</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-GZHM6TH0-8</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2011</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2011</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00198.x</json:string></doi><id>45CCFADB01D158F351CD73E4259F700C0D73CA82</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/45CCFADB01D158F351CD73E4259F700C0D73CA82/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/45CCFADB01D158F351CD73E4259F700C0D73CA82/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/45CCFADB01D158F351CD73E4259F700C0D73CA82/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">The Effect of Smoking on Early Bone Remodeling on Surface Modified Southern Implants®</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2011-09"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The Effect of Smoking on Early Bone Remodeling on Surface Modified Southern Implants®</title><title level="a" type="short">Effect of Smoking on Early Bone Remodeling</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Stefan</forename><surname>Vandeweghe</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Dentist, PhD student, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium;<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Hugo</forename><surname>De Bruyn</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, MSc, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>professor and chairman, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Dr. Hugo De Bruyn, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent Belgium; e‐mail: hugo.debruyn@ugent.be</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">45CCFADB01D158F351CD73E4259F700C0D73CA82</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-GZHM6TH0-8</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00198.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID198</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID198.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2011.13.issue-3</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">13</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="206">206</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="214">214</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-09"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p><hi rend="bold">Introduction:</hi> Smoking affects the survival of turned titanium implants. Although smoking has less impact on the failure rate of rough surface implants, the effect on bone loss on rough surface implants has not been studied yet and may be an important factor in biological stability.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Aim:</hi> To determine the effect of smoking on early implant failures and bone remodeling around moderately rough implants (Southern Implants®, Southern Implants, Irene, South Africa).</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and Methods:</hi> Three hundred twenty‐nine patient records, containing information on 712 installed implants, were scrutinized retrospectively and periapical radiographs were analyzed for interproximal bone level. Mann‐Whitney <hi rend="italic">U</hi>‐test and Fisher's exact test were performed to compare bone level and implant survival in smokers and nonsmokers. Only implants with at least 6 months of function time were analyzed for bone level changes.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results:</hi> The overall survival rate was 98.3%. Implants in smokers had a threefold higher failure rate compared with nonsmokers (5/104 = 4.8% vs 7/608 = 1.2%). This was statistically significant on implant level (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> = .007) but not on patient level (1/41 vs 7/288, <hi rend="italic">p</hi> = .997). Readable radiographs from 363 implants in 169 patients were available with a mean follow‐up of 12 months (SD 5.11; range 6–28). The mean interproximal bone level was 1.36 mm (<hi rend="italic">n</hi> = 363; SD 0.41; range 0.48–3.70). Bone levels were independent of jaw location. Sixty implants from 21 smokers lost statistically significantly (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> = .001) more bone (mean 1.56; SD 0.53; range 0.75–3.22) than the 303 implants in 148 nonsmokers (mean 1.32 mm; SD 0.38; range 0.48–3.7). The maxilla is especially prone to bone loss compared with the mandible (1.70 mm vs 1.26 mm, <hi rend="italic">p</hi> < .001).</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion:</hi> The Southern Implants® system demonstrated a high absolute survival rate. Although smokers are not more prone to implant loss, more pronounced peri‐implant bone loss was observed, especially in the maxilla. Whether this affects future biological complications remains to be investigated in prospective long‐term studies.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">bone loss</term><term xml:id="k2">dental implant</term><term xml:id="k3">implant success</term><term xml:id="k4">implant survival</term><term xml:id="k5">modified surface</term><term xml:id="k6">smoking</term><term xml:id="k7">Southern Implants®</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>ARTICLES</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/45CCFADB01D158F351CD73E4259F700C0D73CA82/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="09103"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.2011.13.issue-3</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="13">13</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="3">3</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2011-09">September 2011</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="4" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00198.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID198"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="9"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2009-09-09"></event><event type="publishedOnlineAcceptedOrEarlyUnpaginated" date="2009-09-09"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.5.2 mode:FullText" date="2011-08-01"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2011-08-01"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="206">206</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="214">214</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Dr. Hugo De Bruyn, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent Belgium; e‐mail: <email>hugo.debruyn@ugent.be</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID198.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="4"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="4"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="68"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="5201"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">The Effect of Smoking on Early Bone Remodeling on Surface Modified Southern Implants®</title><title type="shortAuthors">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Volume 13, Number 3, 2011</title><title type="short">Effect of Smoking on Early Bone Remodeling</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Stefan</givenNames><familyName>Vandeweghe</familyName><degrees>DDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Hugo</givenNames><familyName>De Bruyn</familyName><degrees>DDS, MSc, PhD</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Dentist, PhD student, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>professor and chairman, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">bone loss</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">dental implant</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">implant success</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">implant survival</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">modified surface</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">smoking</keyword><keyword xml:id="k7">Southern Implants®</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p><b>Introduction:</b> Smoking affects the survival of turned titanium implants. Although smoking has less impact on the failure rate of rough surface implants, the effect on bone loss on rough surface implants has not been studied yet and may be an important factor in biological stability.</p><p><b>Aim:</b> To determine the effect of smoking on early implant failures and bone remodeling around moderately rough implants (Southern Implants®, Southern Implants, Irene, South Africa).</p><p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> Three hundred twenty‐nine patient records, containing information on 712 installed implants, were scrutinized retrospectively and periapical radiographs were analyzed for interproximal bone level. Mann‐Whitney <i>U</i>‐test and Fisher's exact test were performed to compare bone level and implant survival in smokers and nonsmokers. Only implants with at least 6 months of function time were analyzed for bone level changes.</p><p><b>Results:</b> The overall survival rate was 98.3%. Implants in smokers had a threefold higher failure rate compared with nonsmokers (5/104 = 4.8% vs 7/608 = 1.2%). This was statistically significant on implant level (<i>p</i> = .007) but not on patient level (1/41 vs 7/288, <i>p</i> = .997). Readable radiographs from 363 implants in 169 patients were available with a mean follow‐up of 12 months (SD 5.11; range 6–28). The mean interproximal bone level was 1.36 mm (<i>n</i> = 363; SD 0.41; range 0.48–3.70). Bone levels were independent of jaw location. Sixty implants from 21 smokers lost statistically significantly (<i>p</i> = .001) more bone (mean 1.56; SD 0.53; range 0.75–3.22) than the 303 implants in 148 nonsmokers (mean 1.32 mm; SD 0.38; range 0.48–3.7). The maxilla is especially prone to bone loss compared with the mandible (1.70 mm vs 1.26 mm, <i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> The Southern Implants® system demonstrated a high absolute survival rate. Although smokers are not more prone to implant loss, more pronounced peri‐implant bone loss was observed, especially in the maxilla. Whether this affects future biological complications remains to be investigated in prospective long‐term studies.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>The Effect of Smoking on Early Bone Remodeling on Surface Modified Southern Implants®</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Effect of Smoking on Early Bone Remodeling</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>The Effect of Smoking on Early Bone Remodeling on Surface Modified Southern Implants®</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Stefan</namePart><namePart type="family">Vandeweghe</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>Dentist, PhD student, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Hugo</namePart><namePart type="family">De Bruyn</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MSc, PhD</namePart><affiliation>professor and chairman, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: hugo.debruyn@ugent.be</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2011-09</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">4</extent><extent unit="tables">4</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">68</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">5201</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Introduction: Smoking affects the survival of turned titanium implants. Although smoking has less impact on the failure rate of rough surface implants, the effect on bone loss on rough surface implants has not been studied yet and may be an important factor in biological stability.</abstract><abstract>Aim: To determine the effect of smoking on early implant failures and bone remodeling around moderately rough implants (Southern Implants®, Southern Implants, Irene, South Africa).</abstract><abstract>Materials and Methods: Three hundred twenty‐nine patient records, containing information on 712 installed implants, were scrutinized retrospectively and periapical radiographs were analyzed for interproximal bone level. Mann‐Whitney U‐test and Fisher's exact test were performed to compare bone level and implant survival in smokers and nonsmokers. Only implants with at least 6 months of function time were analyzed for bone level changes.</abstract><abstract>Results: The overall survival rate was 98.3%. Implants in smokers had a threefold higher failure rate compared with nonsmokers (5/104 = 4.8% vs 7/608 = 1.2%). This was statistically significant on implant level (p = .007) but not on patient level (1/41 vs 7/288, p = .997). Readable radiographs from 363 implants in 169 patients were available with a mean follow‐up of 12 months (SD 5.11; range 6–28). The mean interproximal bone level was 1.36 mm (n = 363; SD 0.41; range 0.48–3.70). Bone levels were independent of jaw location. Sixty implants from 21 smokers lost statistically significantly (p = .001) more bone (mean 1.56; SD 0.53; range 0.75–3.22) than the 303 implants in 148 nonsmokers (mean 1.32 mm; SD 0.38; range 0.48–3.7). The maxilla is especially prone to bone loss compared with the mandible (1.70 mm vs 1.26 mm, p < .001).</abstract><abstract>Conclusion: The Southern Implants® system demonstrated a high absolute survival rate. Although smokers are not more prone to implant loss, more pronounced peri‐implant bone loss was observed, especially in the maxilla. Whether this affects future biological complications remains to be investigated in prospective long‐term studies.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>bone loss</topic><topic>dental implant</topic><topic>implant success</topic><topic>implant survival</topic><topic>modified surface</topic><topic>smoking</topic><topic>Southern Implants®</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2011</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>13</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>206</start><end>214</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">45CCFADB01D158F351CD73E4259F700C0D73CA82</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-GZHM6TH0-8</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00198.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID198</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/45CCFADB01D158F351CD73E4259F700C0D73CA82/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002216 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002216 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:45CCFADB01D158F351CD73E4259F700C0D73CA82
|texte= The Effect of Smoking on Early Bone Remodeling on Surface Modified Southern Implants®
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |