Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

The G8 and G20 as Global Steering Committees for Energy: Opportunities and Constraints

Identifieur interne : 002140 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002139; suivant : 002141

The G8 and G20 as Global Steering Committees for Energy: Opportunities and Constraints

Auteurs : Thijs Van De Graaf ; Kirsten Westphal

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:440F95DB15AB81DF39CE7E07EDB00F919AF4163B

English descriptors

Abstract

This article looks at the opportunities and constraints for the G8 and G20 to act as steering committees in global energy governance. It starts from the premise that, intrinsically, informal consultation mechanisms among major powers have a large potential to act as coordinating bodies for global energy. After assessing the G8’s recent energy work, the article finds that the G8 has made notable strides on the energy front, particularly in areas of low controversy such as energy efficiency, but that its scope of action is limited by internal divisions, a lack of legitimacy, the absence of several key players and the lack of mechanisms for successful implementation of collective action. While some of these problems are addressed by the recent shift to the G20, the G20’s ability to act as a global energy governor remains limited. Nevertheless, by sketching the G20’s recent actions to phase out fossil fuel subsidies, we show that the G20 does have a large potential to make progress in addressing specific energy dossiers. The article concludes by making some concrete policy recommendations for G20 leaders to make full use of this forum’s potential.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00121.x

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:440F95DB15AB81DF39CE7E07EDB00F919AF4163B

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">The G8 and G20 as Global Steering Committees for Energy: Opportunities and Constraints</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van De Graaf, Thijs" sort="Van De Graaf, Thijs" uniqKey="Van De Graaf T" first="Thijs" last="Van De Graaf">Thijs Van De Graaf</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Ghent University</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Westphal, Kirsten" sort="Westphal, Kirsten" uniqKey="Westphal K" first="Kirsten" last="Westphal">Kirsten Westphal</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Institute for International and Security Affairs, Berlin</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:440F95DB15AB81DF39CE7E07EDB00F919AF4163B</idno>
<date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00121.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/440F95DB15AB81DF39CE7E07EDB00F919AF4163B/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002140</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002140</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">The G8 and G20 as Global Steering Committees for Energy: Opportunities and Constraints</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van De Graaf, Thijs" sort="Van De Graaf, Thijs" uniqKey="Van De Graaf T" first="Thijs" last="Van De Graaf">Thijs Van De Graaf</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Ghent University</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Westphal, Kirsten" sort="Westphal, Kirsten" uniqKey="Westphal K" first="Kirsten" last="Westphal">Kirsten Westphal</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Institute for International and Security Affairs, Berlin</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Global Policy</title>
<title level="j" type="sub">Global Energy Governance</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">GLOBAL POLICY</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1758-5880</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1758-5899</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="19">19</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="30">30</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">12</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2011-09">2011-09</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1758-5880</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">1758-5880</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Action plans</term>
<term>Arab world</term>
<term>Biggest countries</term>
<term>Case study</term>
<term>Clean energy</term>
<term>Climate affairs</term>
<term>Climate change</term>
<term>Collective action</term>
<term>Complex policy issue</term>
<term>Consumer subsidies</term>
<term>Countries need</term>
<term>Deliberative role</term>
<term>Economic crisis</term>
<term>Economic development</term>
<term>Effective implementation</term>
<term>Energy consumers</term>
<term>Energy consumption</term>
<term>Energy cooperation</term>
<term>Energy front</term>
<term>Energy governance</term>
<term>Energy governor</term>
<term>Energy issues</term>
<term>Energy matters</term>
<term>Energy players</term>
<term>Energy poverty</term>
<term>Energy production</term>
<term>Energy recommendations</term>
<term>Energy sector</term>
<term>Energy security</term>
<term>Energy sources</term>
<term>Energy subsidies</term>
<term>Energy system</term>
<term>Energy work</term>
<term>Environmental protection</term>
<term>Equal footing</term>
<term>External dimension</term>
<term>Fossil</term>
<term>Fossil fuel subsidies</term>
<term>Fossil fuels</term>
<term>French presidency</term>
<term>Fuel prices</term>
<term>Future summits</term>
<term>Gleneagles</term>
<term>Gleneagles dialogue</term>
<term>Gleneagles summit</term>
<term>Global</term>
<term>Global bioenergy partnership</term>
<term>Global energy</term>
<term>Global energy governance</term>
<term>Global energy security</term>
<term>Global energy security principles</term>
<term>Global governance</term>
<term>Global greenhouse</term>
<term>Global norms</term>
<term>Global policy</term>
<term>Global weight</term>
<term>Governance</term>
<term>Graaf</term>
<term>Heiligendamm</term>
<term>Heiligendamm dialogue process</term>
<term>Heiligendamm process</term>
<term>Hokkaido toyako</term>
<term>Hokkaido toyako summit</term>
<term>Host country</term>
<term>Independent monitoring</term>
<term>Industrialised countries</term>
<term>Informal consultation mechanisms</term>
<term>Internal dimension</term>
<term>Internal divisions</term>
<term>Internal policy coordination</term>
<term>International agenda</term>
<term>International energy agency</term>
<term>International organisations</term>
<term>International partnership</term>
<term>Ipeec</term>
<term>Iterative treatment</term>
<term>John wiley sons</term>
<term>Kirsten</term>
<term>Kirsten westphal</term>
<term>Kirton</term>
<term>Large countries</term>
<term>Leaders declaration</term>
<term>Leadership role</term>
<term>Lesage</term>
<term>London school</term>
<term>Major countries</term>
<term>Major powers</term>
<term>Many countries</term>
<term>Maximise implementation</term>
<term>Meaningful consensus</term>
<term>Member countries</term>
<term>More coherence</term>
<term>Multilateral</term>
<term>Multilateral institutions</term>
<term>Multilateral organisations</term>
<term>National reports</term>
<term>Nonbinding commitments</term>
<term>Notable strides</term>
<term>October</term>
<term>Oecd</term>
<term>Opec</term>
<term>Opec members</term>
<term>Organisation</term>
<term>Other countries</term>
<term>Other words</term>
<term>Past performance</term>
<term>Petersburg plan</term>
<term>Petersburg principles</term>
<term>Petersburg summit</term>
<term>Policy area</term>
<term>Policy coordination</term>
<term>Political science</term>
<term>Potential role</term>
<term>Power generation</term>
<term>Preindustrial levels</term>
<term>Price volatility</term>
<term>Public goods</term>
<term>Recent energy work</term>
<term>Recent shift</term>
<term>Regular summitry</term>
<term>Renewable energy</term>
<term>Renewable energy task force</term>
<term>Same time</term>
<term>Saudi</term>
<term>Saudi arabia</term>
<term>Security affairs</term>
<term>September</term>
<term>Small number</term>
<term>Smaller number</term>
<term>Steering committee</term>
<term>Steering committees</term>
<term>Subsidy</term>
<term>Successful implementation</term>
<term>Summit</term>
<term>Summit processes</term>
<term>Summit reform</term>
<term>Sustainable</term>
<term>Sustainable buildings network</term>
<term>Sustainable development</term>
<term>Sustainable energy system</term>
<term>Thijs</term>
<term>Track record</term>
<term>Variable geometry</term>
<term>Westphal</term>
<term>World bank</term>
<term>World leaders</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Action plans</term>
<term>Arab world</term>
<term>Biggest countries</term>
<term>Case study</term>
<term>Clean energy</term>
<term>Climate affairs</term>
<term>Climate change</term>
<term>Collective action</term>
<term>Complex policy issue</term>
<term>Consumer subsidies</term>
<term>Countries need</term>
<term>Deliberative role</term>
<term>Economic crisis</term>
<term>Economic development</term>
<term>Effective implementation</term>
<term>Energy consumers</term>
<term>Energy consumption</term>
<term>Energy cooperation</term>
<term>Energy front</term>
<term>Energy governance</term>
<term>Energy governor</term>
<term>Energy issues</term>
<term>Energy matters</term>
<term>Energy players</term>
<term>Energy poverty</term>
<term>Energy production</term>
<term>Energy recommendations</term>
<term>Energy sector</term>
<term>Energy security</term>
<term>Energy sources</term>
<term>Energy subsidies</term>
<term>Energy system</term>
<term>Energy work</term>
<term>Environmental protection</term>
<term>Equal footing</term>
<term>External dimension</term>
<term>Fossil</term>
<term>Fossil fuel subsidies</term>
<term>Fossil fuels</term>
<term>French presidency</term>
<term>Fuel prices</term>
<term>Future summits</term>
<term>Gleneagles</term>
<term>Gleneagles dialogue</term>
<term>Gleneagles summit</term>
<term>Global</term>
<term>Global bioenergy partnership</term>
<term>Global energy</term>
<term>Global energy governance</term>
<term>Global energy security</term>
<term>Global energy security principles</term>
<term>Global governance</term>
<term>Global greenhouse</term>
<term>Global norms</term>
<term>Global policy</term>
<term>Global weight</term>
<term>Governance</term>
<term>Graaf</term>
<term>Heiligendamm</term>
<term>Heiligendamm dialogue process</term>
<term>Heiligendamm process</term>
<term>Hokkaido toyako</term>
<term>Hokkaido toyako summit</term>
<term>Host country</term>
<term>Independent monitoring</term>
<term>Industrialised countries</term>
<term>Informal consultation mechanisms</term>
<term>Internal dimension</term>
<term>Internal divisions</term>
<term>Internal policy coordination</term>
<term>International agenda</term>
<term>International energy agency</term>
<term>International organisations</term>
<term>International partnership</term>
<term>Ipeec</term>
<term>Iterative treatment</term>
<term>John wiley sons</term>
<term>Kirsten</term>
<term>Kirsten westphal</term>
<term>Kirton</term>
<term>Large countries</term>
<term>Leaders declaration</term>
<term>Leadership role</term>
<term>Lesage</term>
<term>London school</term>
<term>Major countries</term>
<term>Major powers</term>
<term>Many countries</term>
<term>Maximise implementation</term>
<term>Meaningful consensus</term>
<term>Member countries</term>
<term>More coherence</term>
<term>Multilateral</term>
<term>Multilateral institutions</term>
<term>Multilateral organisations</term>
<term>National reports</term>
<term>Nonbinding commitments</term>
<term>Notable strides</term>
<term>October</term>
<term>Oecd</term>
<term>Opec</term>
<term>Opec members</term>
<term>Organisation</term>
<term>Other countries</term>
<term>Other words</term>
<term>Past performance</term>
<term>Petersburg plan</term>
<term>Petersburg principles</term>
<term>Petersburg summit</term>
<term>Policy area</term>
<term>Policy coordination</term>
<term>Political science</term>
<term>Potential role</term>
<term>Power generation</term>
<term>Preindustrial levels</term>
<term>Price volatility</term>
<term>Public goods</term>
<term>Recent energy work</term>
<term>Recent shift</term>
<term>Regular summitry</term>
<term>Renewable energy</term>
<term>Renewable energy task force</term>
<term>Same time</term>
<term>Saudi</term>
<term>Saudi arabia</term>
<term>Security affairs</term>
<term>September</term>
<term>Small number</term>
<term>Smaller number</term>
<term>Steering committee</term>
<term>Steering committees</term>
<term>Subsidy</term>
<term>Successful implementation</term>
<term>Summit</term>
<term>Summit processes</term>
<term>Summit reform</term>
<term>Sustainable</term>
<term>Sustainable buildings network</term>
<term>Sustainable development</term>
<term>Sustainable energy system</term>
<term>Thijs</term>
<term>Track record</term>
<term>Variable geometry</term>
<term>Westphal</term>
<term>World bank</term>
<term>World leaders</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract">This article looks at the opportunities and constraints for the G8 and G20 to act as steering committees in global energy governance. It starts from the premise that, intrinsically, informal consultation mechanisms among major powers have a large potential to act as coordinating bodies for global energy. After assessing the G8’s recent energy work, the article finds that the G8 has made notable strides on the energy front, particularly in areas of low controversy such as energy efficiency, but that its scope of action is limited by internal divisions, a lack of legitimacy, the absence of several key players and the lack of mechanisms for successful implementation of collective action. While some of these problems are addressed by the recent shift to the G20, the G20’s ability to act as a global energy governor remains limited. Nevertheless, by sketching the G20’s recent actions to phase out fossil fuel subsidies, we show that the G20 does have a large potential to make progress in addressing specific energy dossiers. The article concludes by making some concrete policy recommendations for G20 leaders to make full use of this forum’s potential.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex>
<corpusName>wiley</corpusName>
<keywords>
<teeft>
<json:string>governance</json:string>
<json:string>fossil</json:string>
<json:string>climate change</json:string>
<json:string>organisation</json:string>
<json:string>global energy governance</json:string>
<json:string>sustainable</json:string>
<json:string>kirton</json:string>
<json:string>graaf</json:string>
<json:string>global policy</json:string>
<json:string>john wiley sons</json:string>
<json:string>energy security</json:string>
<json:string>gleneagles</json:string>
<json:string>political science</json:string>
<json:string>fossil fuel subsidies</json:string>
<json:string>london school</json:string>
<json:string>energy issues</json:string>
<json:string>heiligendamm</json:string>
<json:string>westphal</json:string>
<json:string>global</json:string>
<json:string>opec</json:string>
<json:string>thijs</json:string>
<json:string>energy subsidies</json:string>
<json:string>september</json:string>
<json:string>lesage</json:string>
<json:string>kirsten</json:string>
<json:string>ipeec</json:string>
<json:string>oecd</json:string>
<json:string>steering committee</json:string>
<json:string>october</json:string>
<json:string>subsidy</json:string>
<json:string>saudi arabia</json:string>
<json:string>kirsten westphal</json:string>
<json:string>multilateral</json:string>
<json:string>energy work</json:string>
<json:string>world bank</json:string>
<json:string>energy governance</json:string>
<json:string>global governance</json:string>
<json:string>petersburg principles</json:string>
<json:string>fossil fuels</json:string>
<json:string>iterative treatment</json:string>
<json:string>international energy agency</json:string>
<json:string>maximise implementation</json:string>
<json:string>global energy</json:string>
<json:string>heiligendamm process</json:string>
<json:string>energy sources</json:string>
<json:string>global energy security</json:string>
<json:string>effective implementation</json:string>
<json:string>energy sector</json:string>
<json:string>summit processes</json:string>
<json:string>energy governor</json:string>
<json:string>internal divisions</json:string>
<json:string>sustainable development</json:string>
<json:string>successful implementation</json:string>
<json:string>clean energy</json:string>
<json:string>collective action</json:string>
<json:string>leaders declaration</json:string>
<json:string>consumer subsidies</json:string>
<json:string>nonbinding commitments</json:string>
<json:string>major powers</json:string>
<json:string>steering committees</json:string>
<json:string>energy consumption</json:string>
<json:string>price volatility</json:string>
<json:string>international organisations</json:string>
<json:string>economic development</json:string>
<json:string>arab world</json:string>
<json:string>world leaders</json:string>
<json:string>other countries</json:string>
<json:string>policy coordination</json:string>
<json:string>equal footing</json:string>
<json:string>energy cooperation</json:string>
<json:string>variable geometry</json:string>
<json:string>internal policy coordination</json:string>
<json:string>leadership role</json:string>
<json:string>deliberative role</json:string>
<json:string>environmental protection</json:string>
<json:string>external dimension</json:string>
<json:string>global norms</json:string>
<json:string>smaller number</json:string>
<json:string>international agenda</json:string>
<json:string>internal dimension</json:string>
<json:string>global weight</json:string>
<json:string>climate affairs</json:string>
<json:string>more coherence</json:string>
<json:string>meaningful consensus</json:string>
<json:string>action plans</json:string>
<json:string>multilateral institutions</json:string>
<json:string>biggest countries</json:string>
<json:string>past performance</json:string>
<json:string>track record</json:string>
<json:string>renewable energy task force</json:string>
<json:string>other words</json:string>
<json:string>public goods</json:string>
<json:string>gleneagles summit</json:string>
<json:string>major countries</json:string>
<json:string>case study</json:string>
<json:string>countries need</json:string>
<json:string>global bioenergy partnership</json:string>
<json:string>security affairs</json:string>
<json:string>petersburg summit</json:string>
<json:string>global energy security principles</json:string>
<json:string>petersburg plan</json:string>
<json:string>policy area</json:string>
<json:string>energy poverty</json:string>
<json:string>economic crisis</json:string>
<json:string>gleneagles dialogue</json:string>
<json:string>heiligendamm dialogue process</json:string>
<json:string>international partnership</json:string>
<json:string>regular summitry</json:string>
<json:string>energy matters</json:string>
<json:string>potential role</json:string>
<json:string>small number</json:string>
<json:string>industrialised countries</json:string>
<json:string>sustainable buildings network</json:string>
<json:string>same time</json:string>
<json:string>power generation</json:string>
<json:string>national reports</json:string>
<json:string>independent monitoring</json:string>
<json:string>energy players</json:string>
<json:string>renewable energy</json:string>
<json:string>hokkaido toyako summit</json:string>
<json:string>global greenhouse</json:string>
<json:string>preindustrial levels</json:string>
<json:string>complex policy issue</json:string>
<json:string>french presidency</json:string>
<json:string>host country</json:string>
<json:string>hokkaido toyako</json:string>
<json:string>energy recommendations</json:string>
<json:string>member countries</json:string>
<json:string>large countries</json:string>
<json:string>recent shift</json:string>
<json:string>energy system</json:string>
<json:string>energy front</json:string>
<json:string>future summits</json:string>
<json:string>multilateral organisations</json:string>
<json:string>energy consumers</json:string>
<json:string>sustainable energy system</json:string>
<json:string>notable strides</json:string>
<json:string>energy production</json:string>
<json:string>opec members</json:string>
<json:string>recent energy work</json:string>
<json:string>informal consultation mechanisms</json:string>
<json:string>many countries</json:string>
<json:string>fuel prices</json:string>
<json:string>summit reform</json:string>
<json:string>summit</json:string>
<json:string>saudi</json:string>
</teeft>
</keywords>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>Thijs Van de Graaf</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>Ghent University</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<name>Kirsten Westphal</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>Institute for International and Security Affairs, Berlin</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<articleId>
<json:string>GPOL121</json:string>
</articleId>
<arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-318QZ725-0</arkIstex>
<language>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre>
<json:string>article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>This article looks at the opportunities and constraints for the G8 and G20 to act as steering committees in global energy governance. It starts from the premise that, intrinsically, informal consultation mechanisms among major powers have a large potential to act as coordinating bodies for global energy. After assessing the G8’s recent energy work, the article finds that the G8 has made notable strides on the energy front, particularly in areas of low controversy such as energy efficiency, but that its scope of action is limited by internal divisions, a lack of legitimacy, the absence of several key players and the lack of mechanisms for successful implementation of collective action. While some of these problems are addressed by the recent shift to the G20, the G20’s ability to act as a global energy governor remains limited. Nevertheless, by sketching the G20’s recent actions to phase out fossil fuel subsidies, we show that the G20 does have a large potential to make progress in addressing specific energy dossiers. The article concludes by making some concrete policy recommendations for G20 leaders to make full use of this forum’s potential.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators>
<score>9.244</score>
<pdfWordCount>9278</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>55011</pdfCharCount>
<pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageCount>12</pdfPageCount>
<pdfPageSize>566.93 x 741.26 pts</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative>
<abstractWordCount>187</abstractWordCount>
<abstractCharCount>1161</abstractCharCount>
<keywordCount>0</keywordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>The G8 and G20 as Global Steering Committees for Energy: Opportunities and Constraints</title>
<genre>
<json:string>article</json:string>
</genre>
<host>
<title>Global Policy</title>
<language>
<json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1758-5899</json:string>
</doi>
<issn>
<json:string>1758-5880</json:string>
</issn>
<eissn>
<json:string>1758-5899</json:string>
</eissn>
<publisherId>
<json:string>GPOL</json:string>
</publisherId>
<volume>2</volume>
<pages>
<first>19</first>
<last>30</last>
<total>12</total>
</pages>
<genre>
<json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
<subject>
<json:item>
<value>Research Article</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
</host>
<namedEntities>
<unitex>
<date>
<json:string>2009</json:string>
<json:string>2011</json:string>
<json:string>2000</json:string>
<json:string>1979</json:string>
<json:string>2005</json:string>
<json:string>1990s</json:string>
<json:string>2001</json:string>
<json:string>2006</json:string>
<json:string>2002</json:string>
<json:string>2007</json:string>
<json:string>1970s</json:string>
<json:string>2008</json:string>
<json:string>2010</json:string>
<json:string>2050</json:string>
<json:string>1980s</json:string>
</date>
<geogName></geogName>
<orgName>
<json:string>Research Group</json:string>
<json:string>FAO</json:string>
<json:string>World Bank</json:string>
<json:string>Research Article Thijs Van</json:string>
<json:string>Germany Summit Heiligendamm</json:string>
<json:string>Russia, China, India, Australia and South Africa</json:string>
<json:string>Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development</json:string>
<json:string>Russia Summit St Petersburg</json:string>
<json:string>Sons Ltd.</json:string>
<json:string>Brazil, Mexico and Saudi Arabia</json:string>
<json:string>Russia and Canada</json:string>
<json:string>International Monetary Fund</json:string>
<json:string>Italy Canada Source</json:string>
<json:string>China, India, Brazil and Russia</json:string>
<json:string>Japan Ministerial Aomori Summit Hokkaido-Toyako Ministerial Rome Summit L</json:string>
<json:string>Saudi Arabia, Russia, India, China, Indonesia, Argentina, Mexico, South Africa and Brazil</json:string>
<json:string>United Kingdom Summit Gleneagles</json:string>
<json:string>FWO</json:string>
<json:string>China and India</json:string>
<json:string>France and Korea</json:string>
<json:string>IEA</json:string>
<json:string>Turkey and Australia</json:string>
<json:string>International Energy Agency (IEA)</json:string>
<json:string>Flemish Research Foundation</json:string>
<json:string>Argentina, Indonesia and Mexico</json:string>
<json:string>Brazil and Mexico</json:string>
<json:string>IMF</json:string>
<json:string>Mexico and Brazil</json:string>
<json:string>Agriculture Organization</json:string>
<json:string>United States and Saudi Arabia</json:string>
<json:string>International Energy Agency</json:string>
</orgName>
<orgName_funder></orgName_funder>
<orgName_provider></orgName_provider>
<persName>
<json:string>Van de Graaf</json:string>
<json:string>Kirsten Westphal</json:string>
<json:string>John Wiley</json:string>
<json:string>Economies</json:string>
<json:string>London School</json:string>
<json:string>Morales</json:string>
<json:string>Ann Florini</json:string>
<json:string>In</json:string>
<json:string>Political Science</json:string>
<json:string>Dries Lesage</json:string>
<json:string>Fiona Harvey</json:string>
</persName>
<placeName>
<json:string>Paris</json:string>
<json:string>Singapore</json:string>
<json:string>Mexico</json:string>
<json:string>Korea</json:string>
<json:string>Seoul</json:string>
<json:string>Pittsburgh</json:string>
<json:string>Saudi Arabia</json:string>
<json:string>Canada</json:string>
<json:string>Moscow</json:string>
<json:string>Argentina</json:string>
<json:string>India</json:string>
<json:string>Toronto</json:string>
<json:string>America</json:string>
<json:string>Indonesia</json:string>
<json:string>Rome</json:string>
<json:string>Tokyo</json:string>
<json:string>Fukushima</json:string>
<json:string>Copenhagen</json:string>
<json:string>Russia</json:string>
<json:string>St Petersburg</json:string>
</placeName>
<ref_url>
<json:string>http://www.g</json:string>
</ref_url>
<ref_bibl>
<json:string>Huang, 2009</json:string>
<json:string>September 2009</json:string>
<json:string>Kirton, 2007</json:string>
<json:string>Victor and Yueh, 2010</json:string>
<json:string>own calculations based on IEA, 2010</json:string>
<json:string>Kirton, 2006, p. 5</json:string>
<json:string>Florini and Sovacool (2009, p. 5244)</json:string>
<json:string>Bradshaw, 2010</json:string>
<json:string>December 2010</json:string>
<json:string>Kirton, 2006</json:string>
<json:string>Lesage et al., 2010</json:string>
<json:string>Bayne, 1999</json:string>
<json:string>December 2009</json:string>
<json:string>Lesage et al., 2009</json:string>
<json:string>Kirton, 2011</json:string>
<json:string>Caruso et al., 2009</json:string>
<json:string>Martin, 2008</json:string>
<json:string>March 2009</json:string>
<json:string>Victor, 2006</json:string>
<json:string>Cherp et al., 2011</json:string>
<json:string>Carin and Mehlenbacher (2010, p. 31)</json:string>
<json:string>Moltke et al., 2003</json:string>
<json:string>Runnals, 2009</json:string>
<json:string>Kirton and Kokotsis, 2005</json:string>
<json:string>Kirton, 2006, p. 1</json:string>
<json:string>Van de Graaf and Lesage, 2009</json:string>
</ref_bibl>
<bibl></bibl>
</unitex>
</namedEntities>
<ark>
<json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-318QZ725-0</json:string>
</ark>
<categories>
<wos>
<json:string>1 - social science</json:string>
<json:string>2 - political science</json:string>
<json:string>2 - international relations</json:string>
</wos>
<scienceMetrix></scienceMetrix>
<scopus>
<json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Social Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Law</json:string>
<json:string>1 - Physical Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Environmental Science</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law</json:string>
<json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Social Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Political Science and International Relations</json:string>
<json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Economics, Econometrics and Finance</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Economics and Econometrics</json:string>
<json:string>1 - Physical Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Environmental Science</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Global and Planetary Change</json:string>
</scopus>
</categories>
<publicationDate>2011</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2011</copyrightDate>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00121.x</json:string>
</doi>
<id>440F95DB15AB81DF39CE7E07EDB00F919AF4163B</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext>
<json:item>
<extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/440F95DB15AB81DF39CE7E07EDB00F919AF4163B/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/440F95DB15AB81DF39CE7E07EDB00F919AF4163B/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/440F95DB15AB81DF39CE7E07EDB00F919AF4163B/fulltext/tei">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title level="a" type="main">The G8 and G20 as Global Steering Committees for Energy: Opportunities and Constraints</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<availability>
<licence>© 2011 London School of Economics and Political Science and John Wiley & Sons Ltd</licence>
</availability>
<date type="published" when="2011-09"></date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt>
<note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note>
<note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct type="article">
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">The G8 and G20 as Global Steering Committees for Energy: Opportunities and Constraints</title>
<title level="a" type="short">G8/G20 and Energy Governance</title>
<author xml:id="author-0000">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Thijs</forename>
<surname>Van de Graaf</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Ghent University
Institute for International and Security Affairs, Berlin</affiliation>
<affiliation>Ghent University
</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0001">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Kirsten</forename>
<surname>Westphal</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Ghent University
Institute for International and Security Affairs, Berlin</affiliation>
<affiliation>Institute for International and Security Affairs, Berlin</affiliation>
</author>
<idno type="istex">440F95DB15AB81DF39CE7E07EDB00F919AF4163B</idno>
<idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-318QZ725-0</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00121.x</idno>
<idno type="unit">GPOL121</idno>
<idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:GPOL.GPOL121.pdf</idno>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j" type="main">Global Policy</title>
<title level="j" type="sub">Global Energy Governance</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">GLOBAL POLICY</title>
<idno type="pISSN">1758-5880</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1758-5899</idno>
<idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1758-5899</idno>
<idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/gpol.2011.2.issue-s1</idno>
<idno type="product">GPOL</idno>
<idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="19">19</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="30">30</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">12</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2011-09"></date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"> Abstract
<p>This article looks at the opportunities and constraints for the G8 and G20 to act as steering committees in global energy governance. It starts from the premise that, intrinsically, informal consultation mechanisms among major powers have a large potential to act as coordinating bodies for global energy. After assessing the G8’s recent energy work, the article finds that the G8 has made notable strides on the energy front, particularly in areas of low controversy such as energy efficiency, but that its scope of action is limited by internal divisions, a lack of legitimacy, the absence of several key players and the lack of mechanisms for successful implementation of collective action. While some of these problems are addressed by the recent shift to the G20, the G20’s ability to act as a global energy governor remains limited. Nevertheless, by sketching the G20’s recent actions to phase out fossil fuel subsidies, we show that the G20 does have a large potential to make progress in addressing specific energy dossiers. The article concludes by making some concrete policy recommendations for G20 leaders to make full use of this forum’s potential.</p>
Policy Implications
<p>
<list xml:id="l1" style="custom">
<item n="•">
<p> Efforts to solve the various global energy problems are doomed to fail if they do not engage the most relevant and powerful players in this particular issue area. Only a handful of countries are responsible for the bulk of global energy consumption and CO
<hi rend="subscript">2</hi>
emissions.</p>
</item>
<item n="•">
<p> As long as large countries are reluctant to transfer substantial authority over energy issues to formal multilateral settings, informal and high‐level forums such as the G8 and G20 fulfil a paramount function: they ensure continuous dialogue and deliberation with regard to this highly strategic and complex policy issue.</p>
</item>
<item n="•">
<p> While the G20 continues to be plagued by internal divisions on energy and a lack of mechanisms for successful implementation of collective action, compared to the G8 it scores much better in terms of representativeness and the inclusion of all key energy players on an equal footing.</p>
</item>
<item n="•">
<p> To make full use of the G20 as an energy forum the leaders should be farsighted, restrict the number of participants to a maximum of 20, treat energy issues iteratively, allow for independent monitoring of the commitments, and reach out to nonmember countries in a structured manner.</p>
</item>
</list>
</p>
</abstract>
<textClass>
<keywords rend="tocHeading1">
<term>Research Articles</term>
</keywords>
<keywords rend="articleCategory">
<term>Research Article</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en"></language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item>
<extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/440F95DB15AB81DF39CE7E07EDB00F919AF4163B/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata>
<istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body">
<istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:document>
<component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en">
<header>
<publicationMeta level="product">
<publisherInfo>
<publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName>
<publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc>
</publisherInfo>
<doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1758-5899</doi>
<issn type="print">1758-5880</issn>
<issn type="electronic">1758-5899</issn>
<idGroup>
<id type="product" value="GPOL"></id>
<id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id>
</idGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="main" sort="GLOBAL POLICY">Global Policy</title>
</titleGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="part" position="09001">
<doi origin="wiley">10.1111/gpol.2011.2.issue-s1</doi>
<titleGroup>
<title type="specialIssueTitle">Global Energy Governance</title>
</titleGroup>
<numberingGroup>
<numbering type="journalVolume" number="2">2</numbering>
<numbering type="supplement">s1</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<coverDate startDate="2011-09">September 2011</coverDate>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="3" status="forIssue">
<doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00121.x</doi>
<idGroup>
<id type="unit" value="GPOL121"></id>
</idGroup>
<countGroup>
<count type="pageTotal" number="12"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="tocHeading1">Research Articles</title>
<title type="articleCategory">Research Article</title>
</titleGroup>
<copyright>© 2011 London School of Economics and Political Science and John Wiley & Sons Ltd</copyright>
<eventGroup>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.9.3 mode:FullText" date="2011-09-07"></event>
<event type="firstOnline" date="2011-09-07"></event>
<event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2011-09-07"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-26"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-24"></event>
</eventGroup>
<numberingGroup>
<numbering type="pageFirst" number="19">19</numbering>
<numbering type="pageLast" number="30">30</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<linkGroup>
<link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:GPOL.GPOL121.pdf"></link>
</linkGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<contentMeta>
<countGroup>
<count type="figureTotal" number="1"></count>
<count type="tableTotal" number="1"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="main">The G8 and G20 as Global Steering Committees for Energy: Opportunities and Constraints</title>
<title type="shortAuthors">Thijs Van de Graaf and Kirsten Westphal</title>
<title type="short">G8/G20 and Energy Governance</title>
</titleGroup>
<creators>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1">
<personName>
<givenNames>Thijs</givenNames>
<familyName>Van de Graaf</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2">
<personName>
<givenNames>Kirsten</givenNames>
<familyName>Westphal</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
</creators>
<affiliationGroup>
<affiliation xml:id="aff-1-1">
<unparsedAffiliation>Ghent University
</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation xml:id="aff-1-2">
<unparsedAffiliation>Institute for International and Security Affairs, Berlin</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
</affiliationGroup>
<abstractGroup>
<abstract type="main" xml:lang="en">
<section xml:id="abs1-1">
<title type="main">Abstract</title>
<p>This article looks at the opportunities and constraints for the G8 and G20 to act as steering committees in global energy governance. It starts from the premise that, intrinsically, informal consultation mechanisms among major powers have a large potential to act as coordinating bodies for global energy. After assessing the G8’s recent energy work, the article finds that the G8 has made notable strides on the energy front, particularly in areas of low controversy such as energy efficiency, but that its scope of action is limited by internal divisions, a lack of legitimacy, the absence of several key players and the lack of mechanisms for successful implementation of collective action. While some of these problems are addressed by the recent shift to the G20, the G20’s ability to act as a global energy governor remains limited. Nevertheless, by sketching the G20’s recent actions to phase out fossil fuel subsidies, we show that the G20 does have a large potential to make progress in addressing specific energy dossiers. The article concludes by making some concrete policy recommendations for G20 leaders to make full use of this forum’s potential.</p>
</section>
<section xml:id="abs1-2">
<title type="main">Policy Implications</title>
<p>
<list xml:id="l1" style="custom">
<listItem>
<label></label>
<p> Efforts to solve the various global energy problems are doomed to fail if they do not engage the most relevant and powerful players in this particular issue area. Only a handful of countries are responsible for the bulk of global energy consumption and CO
<sub>2</sub>
emissions.</p>
</listItem>
<listItem>
<label></label>
<p> As long as large countries are reluctant to transfer substantial authority over energy issues to formal multilateral settings, informal and high‐level forums such as the G8 and G20 fulfil a paramount function: they ensure continuous dialogue and deliberation with regard to this highly strategic and complex policy issue.</p>
</listItem>
<listItem>
<label></label>
<p> While the G20 continues to be plagued by internal divisions on energy and a lack of mechanisms for successful implementation of collective action, compared to the G8 it scores much better in terms of representativeness and the inclusion of all key energy players on an equal footing.</p>
</listItem>
<listItem>
<label></label>
<p> To make full use of the G20 as an energy forum the leaders should be farsighted, restrict the number of participants to a maximum of 20, treat energy issues iteratively, allow for independent monitoring of the commitments, and reach out to nonmember countries in a structured manner.</p>
</listItem>
</list>
</p>
</section>
</abstract>
</abstractGroup>
</contentMeta>
</header>
</component>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6">
<titleInfo lang="en">
<title>The G8 and G20 as Global Steering Committees for Energy: Opportunities and Constraints</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en">
<title>G8/G20 and Energy Governance</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en">
<title>The G8 and G20 as Global Steering Committees for Energy: Opportunities and Constraints</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Thijs</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Van de Graaf</namePart>
<affiliation>Ghent University</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Kirsten</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Westphal</namePart>
<affiliation>Institute for International and Security Affairs, Berlin</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2011-09</dateIssued>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<extent unit="figures">1</extent>
<extent unit="tables">1</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract>This article looks at the opportunities and constraints for the G8 and G20 to act as steering committees in global energy governance. It starts from the premise that, intrinsically, informal consultation mechanisms among major powers have a large potential to act as coordinating bodies for global energy. After assessing the G8’s recent energy work, the article finds that the G8 has made notable strides on the energy front, particularly in areas of low controversy such as energy efficiency, but that its scope of action is limited by internal divisions, a lack of legitimacy, the absence of several key players and the lack of mechanisms for successful implementation of collective action. While some of these problems are addressed by the recent shift to the G20, the G20’s ability to act as a global energy governor remains limited. Nevertheless, by sketching the G20’s recent actions to phase out fossil fuel subsidies, we show that the G20 does have a large potential to make progress in addressing specific energy dossiers. The article concludes by making some concrete policy recommendations for G20 leaders to make full use of this forum’s potential.</abstract>
<abstract>•  Efforts to solve the various global energy problems are doomed to fail if they do not engage the most relevant and powerful players in this particular issue area. Only a handful of countries are responsible for the bulk of global energy consumption and CO2 emissions. •  As long as large countries are reluctant to transfer substantial authority over energy issues to formal multilateral settings, informal and high‐level forums such as the G8 and G20 fulfil a paramount function: they ensure continuous dialogue and deliberation with regard to this highly strategic and complex policy issue. •  While the G20 continues to be plagued by internal divisions on energy and a lack of mechanisms for successful implementation of collective action, compared to the G8 it scores much better in terms of representativeness and the inclusion of all key energy players on an equal footing. •  To make full use of the G20 as an energy forum the leaders should be farsighted, restrict the number of participants to a maximum of 20, treat energy issues iteratively, allow for independent monitoring of the commitments, and reach out to nonmember countries in a structured manner.</abstract>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Global Policy</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre>
<subject>
<genre>article-category</genre>
<topic>Research Article</topic>
</subject>
<identifier type="ISSN">1758-5880</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1758-5899</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1758-5899</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">GPOL</identifier>
<part>
<date>2011</date>
<detail type="title">
<title>Global Energy Governance</title>
</detail>
<detail type="volume">
<caption>vol.</caption>
<number>2</number>
</detail>
<detail type="supplement">
<caption>Suppl. no.</caption>
<number>s1</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages">
<start>19</start>
<end>30</end>
<total>12</total>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">440F95DB15AB81DF39CE7E07EDB00F919AF4163B</identifier>
<identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-318QZ725-0</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00121.x</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">GPOL121</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2011 London School of Economics and Political Science and John Wiley & Sons Ltd</accessCondition>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
<json:item>
<extension>json</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/json</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/440F95DB15AB81DF39CE7E07EDB00F919AF4163B/metadata/json</uri>
</json:item>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002140 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002140 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:440F95DB15AB81DF39CE7E07EDB00F919AF4163B
   |texte=   The G8 and G20 as Global Steering Committees for Energy: Opportunities and Constraints
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022