Effect of intermittent loading and surface roughness on peri‐implant bone formation in a bone chamber model
Identifieur interne : 001F88 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001F87; suivant : 001F89Effect of intermittent loading and surface roughness on peri‐implant bone formation in a bone chamber model
Auteurs : Joke Duyck ; Elke Slaets ; Kenichi Sasaguri ; Katleen Vandamme ; Ignace NaertSource :
- Journal of Clinical Periodontology [ 0303-6979 ] ; 2007-11.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Acid phosphatase, Active bone apposition, Additional experiment, Biomechanical, Blackwell munksgaard, Blood vessels, Body weight, Bone, Bone area, Bone area fraction, Bone chamber, Bone chamber model, Bone chambers, Bone formation, Bone fraction, Bone healing, Bone marrow, Bone tissue, Bone trabeculae, Bonestimulating effect, Brous tissue, Cell differentiation, Central cavity, Central lumina, Clin periodontol, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical periodontology, Dense tissue, Dental implants, Dentsply friadent, Duyck, Edentulous mandibles, Endothelial cells, Experimental condition, Experimental conditions, Experimental implant, Experimental study, Force transfer, Good biomechanical, Histological, Histological sections, Histomorphometrical analyses, Host bone, Immediate implant loading, Immediate loading, Immunopositive, Immunopositive cells, Implant, Implant axis, Implant cavity, Implant design, Implant healing, Implant installation, Implant loading, Implant osseointegration, Implant removal, Implant roughening, Implant stability, Implant surface roughness, Implant surfaces, Implants research, Individual bone trabeculae, Inner bone chamber, Interfacial micromotion, Intermittent loading, International journal, Journal compilation, Load application, Load transfer, Loading, Loading sessions, Maxillofacial implants, Mechanical conditions, Mechanical implant loading, Mechanical loading, Mechanical stability, Mechanical stimuli, Munksgaard, Naert, Next experiment, Osseointegration, Osteoblast, Osteoblast differentiation, Osteoclast, Other hand, Other studies, Outer bone chamber, Posterior mandible, Primary stability, Reference area, Representative sections, Rough implant, Rough implants, Rough surface, Roughening, Roughness, Same animal, Sampling bone chamber methodology, Several experiments, Similar bone chamber study, Small clusters, Smooth implants, Sole effect, Surface roughening, Surface roughness, Test conditions, Test implants, Tissue area, Tissue blocks, Tissue differentiation, Tissue formation, Tissue growth, Tissue response, Tissue sample, Titanium, Titanium implants, Trabecula, Vandamme, Vander sloten, Vascularization, Vessel fraction, Wiskott belser.
- Teeft :
- Acid phosphatase, Active bone apposition, Additional experiment, Biomechanical, Blackwell munksgaard, Blood vessels, Body weight, Bone, Bone area, Bone area fraction, Bone chamber, Bone chamber model, Bone chambers, Bone formation, Bone fraction, Bone healing, Bone marrow, Bone tissue, Bone trabeculae, Bonestimulating effect, Brous tissue, Cell differentiation, Central cavity, Central lumina, Clin periodontol, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical periodontology, Dense tissue, Dental implants, Dentsply friadent, Duyck, Edentulous mandibles, Endothelial cells, Experimental condition, Experimental conditions, Experimental implant, Experimental study, Force transfer, Good biomechanical, Histological, Histological sections, Histomorphometrical analyses, Host bone, Immediate implant loading, Immediate loading, Immunopositive, Immunopositive cells, Implant, Implant axis, Implant cavity, Implant design, Implant healing, Implant installation, Implant loading, Implant osseointegration, Implant removal, Implant roughening, Implant stability, Implant surface roughness, Implant surfaces, Implants research, Individual bone trabeculae, Inner bone chamber, Interfacial micromotion, Intermittent loading, International journal, Journal compilation, Load application, Load transfer, Loading, Loading sessions, Maxillofacial implants, Mechanical conditions, Mechanical implant loading, Mechanical loading, Mechanical stability, Mechanical stimuli, Munksgaard, Naert, Next experiment, Osseointegration, Osteoblast, Osteoblast differentiation, Osteoclast, Other hand, Other studies, Outer bone chamber, Posterior mandible, Primary stability, Reference area, Representative sections, Rough implant, Rough implants, Rough surface, Roughening, Roughness, Same animal, Sampling bone chamber methodology, Several experiments, Similar bone chamber study, Small clusters, Smooth implants, Sole effect, Surface roughening, Surface roughness, Test conditions, Test implants, Tissue area, Tissue blocks, Tissue differentiation, Tissue formation, Tissue growth, Tissue response, Tissue sample, Titanium, Titanium implants, Trabecula, Vandamme, Vander sloten, Vascularization, Vessel fraction, Wiskott belser.
Abstract
Both implant surface characteristics and mechanical loading are known to affect implant osseointegration. Their interaction and the underlying mechanisms by which they affect peri‐implant healing processes are still unknown. The aim of this study is therefore to investigate the influence of a turned versus a rough (Plus®, Dentsply Friadent) implant surface on peri‐implant bone formation in case of unloaded or loaded implant healing.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01135.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:4116527DE9D1F9A58DBD0168537AA007063A471CLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Effect of intermittent loading and surface roughness on peri‐implant bone formation in a bone chamber model</title><author><name sortKey="Duyck, Joke" sort="Duyck, Joke" uniqKey="Duyck J" first="Joke" last="Duyck">Joke Duyck</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Slaets, Elke" sort="Slaets, Elke" uniqKey="Slaets E" first="Elke" last="Slaets">Elke Slaets</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>BIOMAT Research Group, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sasaguri, Kenichi" sort="Sasaguri, Kenichi" uniqKey="Sasaguri K" first="Kenichi" last="Sasaguri">Kenichi Sasaguri</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Craniofacial Growth and Development Dentistry, Kanagawa Dental College, Yokosuka City, Kanagawa, Japan</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vandamme, Katleen" sort="Vandamme, Katleen" uniqKey="Vandamme K" first="Katleen" last="Vandamme">Katleen Vandamme</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>BIOMAT Research Group, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Naert, Ignace" sort="Naert, Ignace" uniqKey="Naert I" first="Ignace" last="Naert">Ignace Naert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:4116527DE9D1F9A58DBD0168537AA007063A471C</idno><date when="2007" year="2007">2007</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01135.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/4116527DE9D1F9A58DBD0168537AA007063A471C/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001F88</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001F88</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Effect of intermittent loading and surface roughness on peri‐implant bone formation in a bone chamber model</title><author><name sortKey="Duyck, Joke" sort="Duyck, Joke" uniqKey="Duyck J" first="Joke" last="Duyck">Joke Duyck</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Slaets, Elke" sort="Slaets, Elke" uniqKey="Slaets E" first="Elke" last="Slaets">Elke Slaets</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>BIOMAT Research Group, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sasaguri, Kenichi" sort="Sasaguri, Kenichi" uniqKey="Sasaguri K" first="Kenichi" last="Sasaguri">Kenichi Sasaguri</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Craniofacial Growth and Development Dentistry, Kanagawa Dental College, Yokosuka City, Kanagawa, Japan</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vandamme, Katleen" sort="Vandamme, Katleen" uniqKey="Vandamme K" first="Katleen" last="Vandamme">Katleen Vandamme</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>BIOMAT Research Group, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Naert, Ignace" sort="Naert, Ignace" uniqKey="Naert I" first="Ignace" last="Naert">Ignace Naert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-051X</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">34</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">11</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="998">998</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1006">1006</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-11">2007-11</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acid phosphatase</term><term>Active bone apposition</term><term>Additional experiment</term><term>Biomechanical</term><term>Blackwell munksgaard</term><term>Blood vessels</term><term>Body weight</term><term>Bone</term><term>Bone area</term><term>Bone area fraction</term><term>Bone chamber</term><term>Bone chamber model</term><term>Bone chambers</term><term>Bone formation</term><term>Bone fraction</term><term>Bone healing</term><term>Bone marrow</term><term>Bone tissue</term><term>Bone trabeculae</term><term>Bonestimulating effect</term><term>Brous tissue</term><term>Cell differentiation</term><term>Central cavity</term><term>Central lumina</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Dense tissue</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentsply friadent</term><term>Duyck</term><term>Edentulous mandibles</term><term>Endothelial cells</term><term>Experimental condition</term><term>Experimental conditions</term><term>Experimental implant</term><term>Experimental study</term><term>Force transfer</term><term>Good biomechanical</term><term>Histological</term><term>Histological sections</term><term>Histomorphometrical analyses</term><term>Host bone</term><term>Immediate implant loading</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Immunopositive</term><term>Immunopositive cells</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant axis</term><term>Implant cavity</term><term>Implant design</term><term>Implant healing</term><term>Implant installation</term><term>Implant loading</term><term>Implant osseointegration</term><term>Implant removal</term><term>Implant roughening</term><term>Implant stability</term><term>Implant surface roughness</term><term>Implant surfaces</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Individual bone trabeculae</term><term>Inner bone chamber</term><term>Interfacial micromotion</term><term>Intermittent loading</term><term>International journal</term><term>Journal compilation</term><term>Load application</term><term>Load transfer</term><term>Loading</term><term>Loading sessions</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Mechanical conditions</term><term>Mechanical implant loading</term><term>Mechanical loading</term><term>Mechanical stability</term><term>Mechanical stimuli</term><term>Munksgaard</term><term>Naert</term><term>Next experiment</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Osteoblast</term><term>Osteoblast differentiation</term><term>Osteoclast</term><term>Other hand</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Outer bone chamber</term><term>Posterior mandible</term><term>Primary stability</term><term>Reference area</term><term>Representative sections</term><term>Rough implant</term><term>Rough implants</term><term>Rough surface</term><term>Roughening</term><term>Roughness</term><term>Same animal</term><term>Sampling bone chamber methodology</term><term>Several experiments</term><term>Similar bone chamber study</term><term>Small clusters</term><term>Smooth implants</term><term>Sole effect</term><term>Surface roughening</term><term>Surface roughness</term><term>Test conditions</term><term>Test implants</term><term>Tissue area</term><term>Tissue blocks</term><term>Tissue differentiation</term><term>Tissue formation</term><term>Tissue growth</term><term>Tissue response</term><term>Tissue sample</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Trabecula</term><term>Vandamme</term><term>Vander sloten</term><term>Vascularization</term><term>Vessel fraction</term><term>Wiskott belser</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Acid phosphatase</term><term>Active bone apposition</term><term>Additional experiment</term><term>Biomechanical</term><term>Blackwell munksgaard</term><term>Blood vessels</term><term>Body weight</term><term>Bone</term><term>Bone area</term><term>Bone area fraction</term><term>Bone chamber</term><term>Bone chamber model</term><term>Bone chambers</term><term>Bone formation</term><term>Bone fraction</term><term>Bone healing</term><term>Bone marrow</term><term>Bone tissue</term><term>Bone trabeculae</term><term>Bonestimulating effect</term><term>Brous tissue</term><term>Cell differentiation</term><term>Central cavity</term><term>Central lumina</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Dense tissue</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentsply friadent</term><term>Duyck</term><term>Edentulous mandibles</term><term>Endothelial cells</term><term>Experimental condition</term><term>Experimental conditions</term><term>Experimental implant</term><term>Experimental study</term><term>Force transfer</term><term>Good biomechanical</term><term>Histological</term><term>Histological sections</term><term>Histomorphometrical analyses</term><term>Host bone</term><term>Immediate implant loading</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Immunopositive</term><term>Immunopositive cells</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant axis</term><term>Implant cavity</term><term>Implant design</term><term>Implant healing</term><term>Implant installation</term><term>Implant loading</term><term>Implant osseointegration</term><term>Implant removal</term><term>Implant roughening</term><term>Implant stability</term><term>Implant surface roughness</term><term>Implant surfaces</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Individual bone trabeculae</term><term>Inner bone chamber</term><term>Interfacial micromotion</term><term>Intermittent loading</term><term>International journal</term><term>Journal compilation</term><term>Load application</term><term>Load transfer</term><term>Loading</term><term>Loading sessions</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Mechanical conditions</term><term>Mechanical implant loading</term><term>Mechanical loading</term><term>Mechanical stability</term><term>Mechanical stimuli</term><term>Munksgaard</term><term>Naert</term><term>Next experiment</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Osteoblast</term><term>Osteoblast differentiation</term><term>Osteoclast</term><term>Other hand</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Outer bone chamber</term><term>Posterior mandible</term><term>Primary stability</term><term>Reference area</term><term>Representative sections</term><term>Rough implant</term><term>Rough implants</term><term>Rough surface</term><term>Roughening</term><term>Roughness</term><term>Same animal</term><term>Sampling bone chamber methodology</term><term>Several experiments</term><term>Similar bone chamber study</term><term>Small clusters</term><term>Smooth implants</term><term>Sole effect</term><term>Surface roughening</term><term>Surface roughness</term><term>Test conditions</term><term>Test implants</term><term>Tissue area</term><term>Tissue blocks</term><term>Tissue differentiation</term><term>Tissue formation</term><term>Tissue growth</term><term>Tissue response</term><term>Tissue sample</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Trabecula</term><term>Vandamme</term><term>Vander sloten</term><term>Vascularization</term><term>Vessel fraction</term><term>Wiskott belser</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Both implant surface characteristics and mechanical loading are known to affect implant osseointegration. Their interaction and the underlying mechanisms by which they affect peri‐implant healing processes are still unknown. The aim of this study is therefore to investigate the influence of a turned versus a rough (Plus®, Dentsply Friadent) implant surface on peri‐implant bone formation in case of unloaded or loaded implant healing.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>bone formation</json:string><json:string>mechanical loading</json:string><json:string>duyck</json:string><json:string>surface roughness</json:string><json:string>implant loading</json:string><json:string>osseointegration</json:string><json:string>bone chamber</json:string><json:string>experimental conditions</json:string><json:string>vandamme</json:string><json:string>bone tissue</json:string><json:string>bone fraction</json:string><json:string>implant surface roughness</json:string><json:string>roughening</json:string><json:string>journal compilation</json:string><json:string>trabecula</json:string><json:string>munksgaard</json:string><json:string>vascularization</json:string><json:string>histological</json:string><json:string>inner bone chamber</json:string><json:string>osteoclast</json:string><json:string>naert</json:string><json:string>osteoblast</json:string><json:string>biomechanical</json:string><json:string>immunopositive</json:string><json:string>bone trabeculae</json:string><json:string>immediate implant loading</json:string><json:string>blackwell munksgaard</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>blood vessels</json:string><json:string>titanium implants</json:string><json:string>outer bone chamber</json:string><json:string>mechanical implant loading</json:string><json:string>bone marrow</json:string><json:string>immediate loading</json:string><json:string>implant removal</json:string><json:string>vander sloten</json:string><json:string>surface roughening</json:string><json:string>implant stability</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>roughness</json:string><json:string>implant cavity</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>central cavity</json:string><json:string>bone area fraction</json:string><json:string>implant roughening</json:string><json:string>bone chamber model</json:string><json:string>posterior mandible</json:string><json:string>same animal</json:string><json:string>body weight</json:string><json:string>mechanical stability</json:string><json:string>test implants</json:string><json:string>immunopositive cells</json:string><json:string>tissue response</json:string><json:string>rough surface</json:string><json:string>dentsply friadent</json:string><json:string>other hand</json:string><json:string>dense tissue</json:string><json:string>mechanical conditions</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>experimental study</json:string><json:string>histological sections</json:string><json:string>tissue area</json:string><json:string>loading</json:string><json:string>bone</json:string><json:string>titanium</json:string><json:string>additional experiment</json:string><json:string>implant axis</json:string><json:string>sole effect</json:string><json:string>acid phosphatase</json:string><json:string>smooth implants</json:string><json:string>endothelial cells</json:string><json:string>individual bone trabeculae</json:string><json:string>primary stability</json:string><json:string>clin periodontol</json:string><json:string>sampling bone chamber methodology</json:string><json:string>vessel fraction</json:string><json:string>implant installation</json:string><json:string>reference area</json:string><json:string>implant surfaces</json:string><json:string>histomorphometrical analyses</json:string><json:string>load transfer</json:string><json:string>experimental condition</json:string><json:string>host bone</json:string><json:string>wiskott belser</json:string><json:string>active bone apposition</json:string><json:string>osteoblast differentiation</json:string><json:string>rough implant</json:string><json:string>representative sections</json:string><json:string>central lumina</json:string><json:string>small clusters</json:string><json:string>tissue growth</json:string><json:string>experimental implant</json:string><json:string>implant osseointegration</json:string><json:string>next experiment</json:string><json:string>similar bone chamber study</json:string><json:string>rough implants</json:string><json:string>other studies</json:string><json:string>test conditions</json:string><json:string>several experiments</json:string><json:string>implant design</json:string><json:string>interfacial micromotion</json:string><json:string>force transfer</json:string><json:string>bonestimulating effect</json:string><json:string>good biomechanical</json:string><json:string>bone healing</json:string><json:string>load application</json:string><json:string>cell differentiation</json:string><json:string>tissue formation</json:string><json:string>tissue sample</json:string><json:string>bone area</json:string><json:string>intermittent loading</json:string><json:string>clinical periodontology</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>bone chambers</json:string><json:string>implant healing</json:string><json:string>loading sessions</json:string><json:string>tissue blocks</json:string><json:string>tissue differentiation</json:string><json:string>edentulous mandibles</json:string><json:string>brous tissue</json:string><json:string>mechanical stimuli</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Joke Duyck</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Elke Slaets</name><affiliations><json:string>BIOMAT Research Group, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Kenichi Sasaguri</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Craniofacial Growth and Development Dentistry, Kanagawa Dental College, Yokosuka City, Kanagawa, Japan</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Katleen Vandamme</name><affiliations><json:string>BIOMAT Research Group, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Ignace Naert</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>animal</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bone chamber</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant surface roughness</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>mechanical loading</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>osseointegration</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JCPE1135</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-Z9M9F21T-6</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Both implant surface characteristics and mechanical loading are known to affect implant osseointegration. Their interaction and the underlying mechanisms by which they affect peri‐implant healing processes are still unknown. The aim of this study is therefore to investigate the influence of a turned versus a rough (Plus®, Dentsply Friadent) implant surface on peri‐implant bone formation in case of unloaded or loaded implant healing.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>63</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>436</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount><score>7.756</score><pdfWordCount>5941</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>39540</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>Effect of intermittent loading and surface roughness on peri‐implant bone formation in a bone chamber model</title><pmid><json:string>17935504</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0303-6979</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-051X</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JCPE</json:string></publisherId><volume>34</volume><issue>11</issue><pages><first>998</first><last>1006</last><total>9</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2007</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Garland Publishing Inc</json:string><json:string>BIOMAT Research Group, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group School of Dentistry Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery</json:string><json:string>Department of Craniofacial Growth and Development</json:string><json:string>Japan Duyck J, Slaets E, Sasaguri K, Vandamme K, Naert I</json:string><json:string>Medicine Catholic University</json:string><json:string>SAS Institute Inc</json:string><json:string>Research Flanders</json:string><json:string>Friadent</json:string><json:string>New Zealand White</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Van Oosterwyck</json:string><json:string>A. B. Jr</json:string><json:string>Faculty</json:string><json:string>J. Duyck</json:string><json:string>Sante Animale</json:string><json:string>Ignace Naert</json:string><json:string>Katleen Vandamme</json:string><json:string>Critical</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Richmond</json:string><json:string>Mannheim</json:string><json:string>Yokosuka City</json:string><json:string>VA</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>Brussels</json:string><json:string>Eindhoven</json:string><json:string>Zenica</json:string><json:string>York</json:string><json:string>Wetzlar</json:string><json:string>Leuven</json:string><json:string>France</json:string><json:string>Kobe</json:string><json:string>Belgium</json:string><json:string>Netherlands</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Ostmann et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Chiapasco et al. 2001</json:string><json:string>Slaets et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Romeo et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Verbeke & Molenberghs 2000, 2005</json:string><json:string>Rocci et al. (2003)</json:string><json:string>Ericsson et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Abrahamsson et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Piatelli et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Vandamme et al. (2007c)</json:string><json:string>Qu et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Nedir et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Piatelli et al. (1998)</json:string><json:string>Ducy et al. 2001</json:string><json:string>Muller 1997</json:string><json:string>Engstrand et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Vandamme et al. 2007b</json:string><json:string>Duyck et al.</json:string><json:string>Novaes et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Duyck et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Wiskott & Belser 1999</json:string><json:string>Karsenty et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Schincaglia et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Bronckers et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>De Smet et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Leucht et al. (2007)</json:string><json:string>Vandamme et al. 2007a</json:string><json:string>Wennerberg et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Botticelli et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Duyck et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Gapski et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Szmukler-Moncler et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Bronckers et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Abrahamsson et al. (2004)</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-Z9M9F21T-6</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Periodontics</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2007</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2007</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01135.x</json:string></doi><id>4116527DE9D1F9A58DBD0168537AA007063A471C</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4116527DE9D1F9A58DBD0168537AA007063A471C/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4116527DE9D1F9A58DBD0168537AA007063A471C/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/4116527DE9D1F9A58DBD0168537AA007063A471C/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Effect of intermittent loading and surface roughness on peri‐implant bone formation in a bone chamber model</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-11"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Effect of intermittent loading and surface roughness on peri‐implant bone formation in a bone chamber model</title><title level="a" type="short">Influence of controlled mechanical implant loading and surface roughness</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Joke</forename><surname>Duyck</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Elke</forename><surname>Slaets</surname></persName><affiliation>BIOMAT Research Group, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Kenichi</forename><surname>Sasaguri</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Craniofacial Growth and Development Dentistry, Kanagawa Dental College, Yokosuka City, Kanagawa, Japan<address><country key="JP"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Katleen</forename><surname>Vandamme</surname></persName><affiliation>BIOMAT Research Group, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Ignace</forename><surname>Naert</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">4116527DE9D1F9A58DBD0168537AA007063A471C</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-Z9M9F21T-6</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01135.x</idno><idno type="unit">JCPE1135</idno><idno type="supplier">1135</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JCPE.JCPE1135.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="pISSN">0303-6979</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-051X</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cpe.2007.34.issue-11</idno><idno type="product">JCPE</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">34</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">11</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="998">998</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1006">1006</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-11"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p>Both implant surface characteristics and mechanical loading are known to affect implant osseointegration. Their interaction and the underlying mechanisms by which they affect peri‐implant healing processes are still unknown. The aim of this study is therefore to investigate the influence of a turned <hi rend="italic">versus</hi> a rough (Plus<hi rend="superscript">®</hi>, Dentsply Friadent) implant surface on peri‐implant bone formation in case of unloaded or loaded implant healing.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Material and Methods: </hi> Bone formation was evaluated around screw‐shaped implants under four experimental conditions using a repeated sampling bone chamber methodology: (1) unloaded turned implant (CU), (2) unloaded implant with a rough surface (TU), (3) loaded turned implant (CL), and (4) loaded implant with a rough surface (TL). Peri‐implant tissue samples were paraffin embedded after implant removal and examined histologically and histomorphometrically. A mixed model was used for statistical analysis.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi> The surface of bone tissue relative to the total tissue area (bone area fraction) was not affected by the experimental conditions. The areas of bone trabeculae relative to the bone area (bone fraction) were significantly higher for TL compared with CU and TU. The bone fraction in the vicinity (100 <hi rend="italic">μ</hi>m zone) of the implant (BFZ) was significantly the highest around the loaded roughened implants (TL).</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion: </hi> Implant loading did not affect bone formation in the absence of surface roughness, and implant surface roughness had no effect in the absence of loading. However, a bone‐stimulating effect in the implant's vicinity was assigned to the rough surface when the implant was loaded.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">animal</term><term xml:id="k2">bone chamber</term><term xml:id="k3">implant surface roughness</term><term xml:id="k4">mechanical loading</term><term xml:id="k5">osseointegration</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Implant Therapy</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4116527DE9D1F9A58DBD0168537AA007063A471C/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</doi><issn type="print">0303-6979</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-051X</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JCPE"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="11011"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cpe.2007.34.issue-11</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="34">34</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="11">11</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2007-11">November 2007</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="13" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01135.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JCPE1135"></id><id type="supplier" value="1135"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="9"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Implant Therapy</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2007-10-11"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-10-11"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-09"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-23"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="998">998</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="1006">1006</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Address:
<i>Prof. J. Duyck</i>
<i>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group</i>
<i>School of Dentistry Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery</i>
<i>Faculty of Medicine</i>
<i>Catholic University of Leuven (K.U.Leuven)</i>
<i>Kapucijnenvoer 7</i>
<i>B‐3000 Leuven</i>
<i>Belgium</i>
E‐mail: <email normalForm="Joke.Duyck@uz.kuleuven.be">Joke.Duyck@uz.kuleuven.be</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JCPE.JCPE1135.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication 20 July 2007</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="7"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="1"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="37"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="7670"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="52"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Effect of intermittent loading and surface roughness on peri‐implant bone formation in a bone chamber model</title><title type="shortAuthors">Duyck et al.</title><title type="short">Influence of controlled mechanical implant loading and surface roughness</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Joke</givenNames><familyName>Duyck</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Elke</givenNames><familyName>Slaets</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Kenichi</givenNames><familyName>Sasaguri</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Katleen</givenNames><familyName>Vandamme</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Ignace</givenNames><familyName>Naert</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>BIOMAT Research Group, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="JP"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Craniofacial Growth and Development Dentistry, Kanagawa Dental College, Yokosuka City, Kanagawa, Japan</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">animal</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">bone chamber</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">implant surface roughness</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">mechanical loading</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">osseointegration</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><!--
Duyck J, Slaets E, Sasaguri K, Vandamme K, Naert I. Effect of intermittent loading and surface roughness on peri-implant bone formation in a bone chamber model. J Clin Periodontol 2007; 34: 998–1006. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01135.x.
--><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>Both implant surface characteristics and mechanical loading are known to affect implant osseointegration. Their interaction and the underlying mechanisms by which they affect peri‐implant healing processes are still unknown. The aim of this study is therefore to investigate the influence of a turned <i>versus</i> a rough (Plus<sup>®</sup>, Dentsply Friadent) implant surface on peri‐implant bone formation in case of unloaded or loaded implant healing.</p><p><b>Material and Methods: </b> Bone formation was evaluated around screw‐shaped implants under four experimental conditions using a repeated sampling bone chamber methodology: (1) unloaded turned implant (CU), (2) unloaded implant with a rough surface (TU), (3) loaded turned implant (CL), and (4) loaded implant with a rough surface (TL). Peri‐implant tissue samples were paraffin embedded after implant removal and examined histologically and histomorphometrically. A mixed model was used for statistical analysis.</p><p><b>Results: </b> The surface of bone tissue relative to the total tissue area (bone area fraction) was not affected by the experimental conditions. The areas of bone trabeculae relative to the bone area (bone fraction) were significantly higher for TL compared with CU and TU. The bone fraction in the vicinity (100 <i>μ</i>m zone) of the implant (BFZ) was significantly the highest around the loaded roughened implants (TL).</p><p><b>Conclusion: </b> Implant loading did not affect bone formation in the absence of surface roughness, and implant surface roughness had no effect in the absence of loading. However, a bone‐stimulating effect in the implant's vicinity was assigned to the rough surface when the implant was loaded.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note xml:id="fn1" numbered="no"><p><b>Conflict of interest and source of funding statement</b> The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
This study is financially supported by the Fund for Scientific Research Flanders and Dentsply Friadent (Mannheim, Germany).</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Effect of intermittent loading and surface roughness on peri‐implant bone formation in a bone chamber model</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Influence of controlled mechanical implant loading and surface roughness</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Effect of intermittent loading and surface roughness on peri‐implant bone formation in a bone chamber model</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Joke</namePart><namePart type="family">Duyck</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Elke</namePart><namePart type="family">Slaets</namePart><affiliation>BIOMAT Research Group, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Kenichi</namePart><namePart type="family">Sasaguri</namePart><affiliation>Department of Craniofacial Growth and Development Dentistry, Kanagawa Dental College, Yokosuka City, Kanagawa, Japan</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Katleen</namePart><namePart type="family">Vandamme</namePart><affiliation>BIOMAT Research Group, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Ignace</namePart><namePart type="family">Naert</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2007-11</dateIssued><edition>Accepted for publication 20 July 2007</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2007</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">7</extent><extent unit="tables">1</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">37</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">52</extent><extent unit="words">7670</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Both implant surface characteristics and mechanical loading are known to affect implant osseointegration. Their interaction and the underlying mechanisms by which they affect peri‐implant healing processes are still unknown. The aim of this study is therefore to investigate the influence of a turned versus a rough (Plus®, Dentsply Friadent) implant surface on peri‐implant bone formation in case of unloaded or loaded implant healing.</abstract><abstract>Material and Methods: Bone formation was evaluated around screw‐shaped implants under four experimental conditions using a repeated sampling bone chamber methodology: (1) unloaded turned implant (CU), (2) unloaded implant with a rough surface (TU), (3) loaded turned implant (CL), and (4) loaded implant with a rough surface (TL). Peri‐implant tissue samples were paraffin embedded after implant removal and examined histologically and histomorphometrically. A mixed model was used for statistical analysis.</abstract><abstract>Results: The surface of bone tissue relative to the total tissue area (bone area fraction) was not affected by the experimental conditions. The areas of bone trabeculae relative to the bone area (bone fraction) were significantly higher for TL compared with CU and TU. The bone fraction in the vicinity (100 μm zone) of the implant (BFZ) was significantly the highest around the loaded roughened implants (TL).</abstract><abstract>Conclusion: Implant loading did not affect bone formation in the absence of surface roughness, and implant surface roughness had no effect in the absence of loading. However, a bone‐stimulating effect in the implant's vicinity was assigned to the rough surface when the implant was loaded.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>animal</topic><topic>bone chamber</topic><topic>implant surface roughness</topic><topic>mechanical loading</topic><topic>osseointegration</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0303-6979</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-051X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JCPE</identifier><part><date>2007</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>34</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>11</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>998</start><end>1006</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">4116527DE9D1F9A58DBD0168537AA007063A471C</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-Z9M9F21T-6</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01135.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JCPE1135</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4116527DE9D1F9A58DBD0168537AA007063A471C/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001F88 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001F88 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:4116527DE9D1F9A58DBD0168537AA007063A471C
|texte= Effect of intermittent loading and surface roughness on peri‐implant bone formation in a bone chamber model
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |