A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed prostheses. Part I: Periodontal aspects
Identifieur interne : 001F04 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001F03; suivant : 001F05A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed prostheses. Part I: Periodontal aspects
Auteurs : M. Quirynen ; I. Naert ; D. Van Steenberghe ; L. NysSource :
- The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry [ 0022-3913 ] ; 1992.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Abutment installation, Adell, Albrektsson, Annual cmbh, Bone apposition, Bone height, Bone loss, Bone quality, Branemark, Cmbh, Complete edentulism, Cumulative failure rate, Dent, Dentistry, Edentulous, Edentulous jaws, Edentulous patients, Failure rate, First year, Fixture, Fixture loss, Frequency distribution, Implant, Individual fixtures, Lekholm, Leuven, Loading time, Longitudinal, Longitudinal study, Mandible, Marginal bone height, Maxilla, Maxillofac, Naert, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated fixtures, Osseointegrated implants, Osseointegrated prosthesis, Osseointegration, Periotest, Primary stability, Prosthesis, Prosthet, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Quirynen, Radiograph, Resorption, Resorption anatomy, Retrospective study, Second year, Significant difference, Standard fixtures, Steenberghe, Zarb.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Abutment installation, Adell, Albrektsson, Annual cmbh, Bone apposition, Bone height, Bone loss, Bone quality, Branemark, Cmbh, Complete edentulism, Cumulative failure rate, Dent, Dentistry, Edentulous, Edentulous jaws, Edentulous patients, Failure rate, First year, Fixture, Fixture loss, Frequency distribution, Implant, Individual fixtures, Lekholm, Leuven, Loading time, Longitudinal, Longitudinal study, Mandible, Marginal bone height, Maxilla, Maxillofac, Naert, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated fixtures, Osseointegrated implants, Osseointegrated prosthesis, Osseointegration, Periotest, Primary stability, Prosthesis, Prosthet, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Quirynen, Radiograph, Resorption, Resorption anatomy, Retrospective study, Second year, Significant difference, Standard fixtures, Steenberghe, Zarb.
Abstract
Abstract: Ninety-one consecutive edentulous patients who had been treated by means of fixed prostheses (n = 103) supported by Brȧnemark implants (n = 589) were examined. Eighteen fixtures (3%) failed to integrate. After a mean loading time of 32 (range 6 to 80) and 38 months (range 5 to 83) for fixtures in the maxilla and mandible, respectively, an additional 12 fixtures lost integration. The cumulative failure rate for individual fixtures after 6 years was 8.4% and 5% for maxillae and mandibles, respectively. Only one patient had to revert to complete dentures. For fixtures in the maxillae, the mean marginal bone loss was 0.7, 0.1, and 0.2 mm for each of the first 3 years of loading, respectively; for fixtures in mandibles, the corresponding values were 0.7, 0.2, and 0.1 mm. The loss in marginal bone height was equal in both jaws and was not related to bleeding on probing or to the preoperative resorption anatomy.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90383-L
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:3F26E8181797757FB6C91318BB2D6CBE63F024CFLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed prostheses. Part I: Periodontal aspects</title><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M." last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Naert, I" sort="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I." last="Naert">I. Naert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D." last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nys, L" sort="Nys, L" uniqKey="Nys L" first="L." last="Nys">L. Nys</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:3F26E8181797757FB6C91318BB2D6CBE63F024CF</idno><date when="1992" year="1992">1992</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/0022-3913(92)90383-L</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/3F26E8181797757FB6C91318BB2D6CBE63F024CF/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001F04</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001F04</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed prostheses. Part I: Periodontal aspects</title><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M." last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Naert, I" sort="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I." last="Naert">I. Naert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D." last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nys, L" sort="Nys, L" uniqKey="Nys L" first="L." last="Nys">L. Nys</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">YMPR</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1992">1992</date><biblScope unit="volume">68</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="655">655</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="663">663</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Abutment installation</term><term>Adell</term><term>Albrektsson</term><term>Annual cmbh</term><term>Bone apposition</term><term>Bone height</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone quality</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Cmbh</term><term>Complete edentulism</term><term>Cumulative failure rate</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous jaws</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Failure rate</term><term>First year</term><term>Fixture</term><term>Fixture loss</term><term>Frequency distribution</term><term>Implant</term><term>Individual fixtures</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Leuven</term><term>Loading time</term><term>Longitudinal</term><term>Longitudinal study</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Marginal bone height</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Naert</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated fixtures</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Osseointegrated prosthesis</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Periotest</term><term>Primary stability</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthet</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Quirynen</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Resorption</term><term>Resorption anatomy</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Second year</term><term>Significant difference</term><term>Standard fixtures</term><term>Steenberghe</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Abutment installation</term><term>Adell</term><term>Albrektsson</term><term>Annual cmbh</term><term>Bone apposition</term><term>Bone height</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone quality</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Cmbh</term><term>Complete edentulism</term><term>Cumulative failure rate</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous jaws</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Failure rate</term><term>First year</term><term>Fixture</term><term>Fixture loss</term><term>Frequency distribution</term><term>Implant</term><term>Individual fixtures</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Leuven</term><term>Loading time</term><term>Longitudinal</term><term>Longitudinal study</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Marginal bone height</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Naert</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated fixtures</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Osseointegrated prosthesis</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Periotest</term><term>Primary stability</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthet</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Quirynen</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Resorption</term><term>Resorption anatomy</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Second year</term><term>Significant difference</term><term>Standard fixtures</term><term>Steenberghe</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: Ninety-one consecutive edentulous patients who had been treated by means of fixed prostheses (n = 103) supported by Brȧnemark implants (n = 589) were examined. Eighteen fixtures (3%) failed to integrate. After a mean loading time of 32 (range 6 to 80) and 38 months (range 5 to 83) for fixtures in the maxilla and mandible, respectively, an additional 12 fixtures lost integration. The cumulative failure rate for individual fixtures after 6 years was 8.4% and 5% for maxillae and mandibles, respectively. Only one patient had to revert to complete dentures. For fixtures in the maxillae, the mean marginal bone loss was 0.7, 0.1, and 0.2 mm for each of the first 3 years of loading, respectively; for fixtures in mandibles, the corresponding values were 0.7, 0.2, and 0.1 mm. The loss in marginal bone height was equal in both jaws and was not related to bleeding on probing or to the preoperative resorption anatomy.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated</json:string><json:string>fixture</json:string><json:string>osseointegration</json:string><json:string>abutment connection</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>lekholm</json:string><json:string>resorption</json:string><json:string>quirynen</json:string><json:string>maxillofac</json:string><json:string>first year</json:string><json:string>cmbh</json:string><json:string>adell</json:string><json:string>steenberghe</json:string><json:string>branemark</json:string><json:string>periotest</json:string><json:string>prosthet</json:string><json:string>leuven</json:string><json:string>abutment installation</json:string><json:string>radiograph</json:string><json:string>albrektsson</json:string><json:string>naert</json:string><json:string>zarb</json:string><json:string>frequency distribution</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>failure rate</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>resorption anatomy</json:string><json:string>bone quality</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>standard fixtures</json:string><json:string>fixture loss</json:string><json:string>bone height</json:string><json:string>loading time</json:string><json:string>cumulative failure rate</json:string><json:string>primary stability</json:string><json:string>significant difference</json:string><json:string>individual fixtures</json:string><json:string>edentulous jaws</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated fixtures</json:string><json:string>annual cmbh</json:string><json:string>longitudinal</json:string><json:string>complete edentulism</json:string><json:string>second year</json:string><json:string>longitudinal study</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>marginal bone height</json:string><json:string>bone apposition</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated prosthesis</json:string><json:string>retrospective study</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>M. Quirynen DDS, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>I. Naert DDS, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>D. van Steenberghe MD, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>L. Nys</name><affiliations><json:string>Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Maxillofacial prosthetics and dental implants</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>9290383L</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/6H6-07B67QR2-9</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>Full-length article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: Ninety-one consecutive edentulous patients who had been treated by means of fixed prostheses (n = 103) supported by Brȧnemark implants (n = 589) were examined. Eighteen fixtures (3%) failed to integrate. After a mean loading time of 32 (range 6 to 80) and 38 months (range 5 to 83) for fixtures in the maxilla and mandible, respectively, an additional 12 fixtures lost integration. The cumulative failure rate for individual fixtures after 6 years was 8.4% and 5% for maxillae and mandibles, respectively. Only one patient had to revert to complete dentures. For fixtures in the maxillae, the mean marginal bone loss was 0.7, 0.1, and 0.2 mm for each of the first 3 years of loading, respectively; for fixtures in mandibles, the corresponding values were 0.7, 0.2, and 0.1 mm. The loss in marginal bone height was equal in both jaws and was not related to bleeding on probing or to the preoperative resorption anatomy.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.207</score><pdfWordCount>4335</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>28656</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>612 x 828 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>156</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>929</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>1</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed prostheses. Part I: Periodontal aspects</title><pmid><json:string>1403946</json:string></pmid><pii><json:string>0022-3913(92)90383-L</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><title>The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><publicationDate>1992</publicationDate><issn><json:string>0022-3913</json:string></issn><pii><json:string>S0022-3913(05)X8124-0</json:string></pii><volume>68</volume><issue>4</issue><pages><first>655</first><last>663</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1992</json:string><json:string>1982</json:string><json:string>20</json:string><json:string>1988</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Laboratory for Statistics and Experimental Design</json:string><json:string>Leuven Center</json:string><json:string>Quetin GMBH, Germany</json:string><json:string>Catholic University</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven</json:string><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Periotest</json:string><json:string>D. van Steenberghe</json:string><json:string>I. Naert</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Gothenburg</json:string><json:string>Leuven</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Belgium</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Babbush et al.</json:string><json:string>Albrektsson et al.</json:string><json:string>Shulman et al.</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/6H6-07B67QR2-9</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string><json:string>4 - hemopathies</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1992</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1992</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1016/0022-3913(92)90383-L</json:string></doi><id>3F26E8181797757FB6C91318BB2D6CBE63F024CF</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/3F26E8181797757FB6C91318BB2D6CBE63F024CF/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/3F26E8181797757FB6C91318BB2D6CBE63F024CF/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/3F26E8181797757FB6C91318BB2D6CBE63F024CF/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed prostheses. Part I: Periodontal aspects</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>©1992 The C. V. Mosby Company</p></availability><date>1992</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed prostheses. Part I: Periodontal aspects</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">M.</forename><surname>Quirynen</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName><note type="biography">Professor, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven.</note><affiliation>Professor, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven.</affiliation><affiliation>Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">I.</forename><surname>Naert</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName><note type="biography">Reprint requests to: Dr. I. Naert Department of Prosthetic Dentistry School of Dentistry Faculty of Medicine Catholic University of Leuven Capucijnenvoer 7 B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.</note><note type="biography">Professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven.</note><affiliation>Reprint requests to: Dr. I. Naert Department of Prosthetic Dentistry School of Dentistry Faculty of Medicine Catholic University of Leuven Capucijnenvoer 7 B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.</affiliation><affiliation>Professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven.</affiliation><affiliation>Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">D.</forename><surname>van Steenberghe</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">MD, PhD</roleName><note type="biography">Professor and Head, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven.</note><affiliation>Professor and Head, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven.</affiliation><affiliation>Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">L.</forename><surname>Nys</surname></persName><note type="biography">Researcher, Laboratory for Statistics and Experimental Design, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Heverlee.</note><affiliation>Researcher, Laboratory for Statistics and Experimental Design, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Heverlee.</affiliation><affiliation>Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">3F26E8181797757FB6C91318BB2D6CBE63F024CF</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/0022-3913(92)90383-L</idno><idno type="PII">0022-3913(92)90383-L</idno><idno type="ArticleID">9290383L</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j">The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">YMPR</title><idno type="pISSN">0022-3913</idno><idno type="PII">S0022-3913(05)X8124-0</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1992"></date><biblScope unit="volume">68</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="655">655</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="663">663</biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1992</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Abstract: Ninety-one consecutive edentulous patients who had been treated by means of fixed prostheses (n = 103) supported by Brȧnemark implants (n = 589) were examined. Eighteen fixtures (3%) failed to integrate. After a mean loading time of 32 (range 6 to 80) and 38 months (range 5 to 83) for fixtures in the maxilla and mandible, respectively, an additional 12 fixtures lost integration. The cumulative failure rate for individual fixtures after 6 years was 8.4% and 5% for maxillae and mandibles, respectively. Only one patient had to revert to complete dentures. For fixtures in the maxillae, the mean marginal bone loss was 0.7, 0.1, and 0.2 mm for each of the first 3 years of loading, respectively; for fixtures in mandibles, the corresponding values were 0.7, 0.2, and 0.1 mm. The loss in marginal bone height was equal in both jaws and was not related to bleeding on probing or to the preoperative resorption anatomy.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>article-category</head><item><term>Maxillofacial prosthetics and dental implants</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1992">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/3F26E8181797757FB6C91318BB2D6CBE63F024CF/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier doc found" wicri:toSee="Elsevier, no converted or simple article"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 5.0.1//EN//XML" URI="art501.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><article version="5.0" xml:lang="en" docsubtype="fla"><item-info><jid>YMPR</jid><aid>9290383L</aid><ce:pii>0022-3913(92)90383-L</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1016/0022-3913(92)90383-L</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="unknown" year="1992">The C. V. Mosby Company</ce:copyright><ce:doctopics><ce:doctopic><ce:text>Maxillofacial prosthetics and dental implants</ce:text></ce:doctopic></ce:doctopics></item-info><head><ce:title>A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed prostheses. Part I: Periodontal aspects</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>M.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Quirynen</ce:surname><ce:degrees>DDS, PhD</ce:degrees><ce:cross-ref refid="fn1"><ce:sup>a</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>I.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Naert</ce:surname><ce:degrees>DDS, PhD</ce:degrees><ce:cross-ref refid="cor1"><ce:sup>*</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="fn2"><ce:sup>b</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>D.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>van Steenberghe</ce:surname><ce:degrees>MD, PhD</ce:degrees><ce:cross-ref refid="fn3"><ce:sup>c</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>L.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Nys</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="fn4"><ce:sup>d</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:affiliation><ce:textfn>Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:correspondence id="cor1"><ce:label>*</ce:label><ce:text><ce:italic>Reprint requests to:</ce:italic> <ce:small-caps>Dr. I. Naert Department of Prosthetic Dentistry School of Dentistry Faculty of Medicine Catholic University of Leuven Capucijnenvoer</ce:small-caps> 7 B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.</ce:text></ce:correspondence><ce:footnote id="fn1"><ce:label>a</ce:label><ce:note-para>Professor, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven.</ce:note-para></ce:footnote><ce:footnote id="fn2"><ce:label>b</ce:label><ce:note-para>Professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven.</ce:note-para></ce:footnote><ce:footnote id="fn3"><ce:label>c</ce:label><ce:note-para>Professor and Head, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven.</ce:note-para></ce:footnote><ce:footnote id="fn4"><ce:label>d</ce:label><ce:note-para>Researcher, Laboratory for Statistics and Experimental Design, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Heverlee.</ce:note-para></ce:footnote></ce:author-group><ce:abstract id="ab1" class="author" xml:lang="en"><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para>Ninety-one consecutive edentulous patients who had been treated by means of fixed prostheses (n = 103) supported by Brȧnemark implants (<ce:italic>n</ce:italic> = 589) were examined. Eighteen fixtures (3%) failed to integrate. After a mean loading time of 32 (range 6 to 80) and 38 months (range 5 to 83) for fixtures in the maxilla and mandible, respectively, an additional 12 fixtures lost integration. The cumulative failure rate for individual fixtures after 6 years was 8.4% and 5% for maxillae and mandibles, respectively. Only one patient had to revert to complete dentures. For fixtures in the maxillae, the mean marginal bone loss was 0.7, 0.1, and 0.2 mm for each of the first 3 years of loading, respectively; for fixtures in mandibles, the corresponding values were 0.7, 0.2, and 0.1 mm. The loss in marginal bone height was equal in both jaws and was not related to bleeding on probing or to the preoperative resorption anatomy.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract></head><tail><ce:bibliography><ce:section-title>References</ce:section-title><ce:bibliography-sec><ce:bib-reference id="bib1"><ce:label>1.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Adell</ce:surname><ce:given-name>R</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Lekholm</ce:surname><ce:given-name>U</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Rockler</ce:surname><ce:given-name>B</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Brȧnemark</ce:surname><ce:given-name>P-I</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J Oral Surg</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>10</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1981</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>387</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>416</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib2"><ce:label>2.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Adell</ce:surname><ce:given-name>R</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Eriksson</ce:surname><ce:given-name>B</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Lekholm</ce:surname><ce:given-name>U</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Brȧnemark</ce:surname><ce:given-name>P-I</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Jemt</ce:surname><ce:given-name>T</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>A long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>5</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1990</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>347</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>359</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib3"><ce:label>3.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Albrektsson</ce:surname><ce:given-name>T</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Zarb</ce:surname><ce:given-name>G</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Worthington</ce:surname><ce:given-name>DP</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Eriksson</ce:surname><ce:given-name>RA</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants. A review and proposed criteria of success</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>1</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:issue-nr>1</sb:issue-nr><sb:date>1986</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>11</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>25</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib4"><ce:label>4.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Albrektsson</ce:surname><ce:given-name>T</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Blomberg</ce:surname><ce:given-name>S</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Brȧnemark</ce:surname><ce:given-name>A</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Carlsson</ce:surname><ce:given-name>GE</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Edentulousness—an oral handicap. Patient reactions to treatment with jawbone-anchored prostheses</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Oral Rehabil</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>14</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1987</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>503</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>511</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib5"><ce:label>5.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Albrektsson</ce:surname><ce:given-name>T</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Bergman</ce:surname><ce:given-name>B</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Folmer</ce:surname><ce:given-name>T</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:et-al></sb:et-al></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>A multicenter report on osseointegrated oral implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Prosthet Dent</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>60</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1988</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>75</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>84</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib6"><ce:label>6.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Zarb</ce:surname><ce:given-name>GA</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Schmitt</ce:surname><ce:given-name>A</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part I: surgical results</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Prosthet Dent</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>63</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1989</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>451</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>457</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib7"><ce:label>7.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Zarb</ce:surname><ce:given-name>GA</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Schmitt</ce:surname><ce:given-name>A</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part III: problems and complications encountered</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Prosthet Dent</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>64</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1990</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>185</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>194</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib8"><ce:label>8.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Naert</ce:surname><ce:given-name>I</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Quirynen</ce:surname><ce:given-name>M</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>van Steenberghe</ce:surname><ce:given-name>D</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Darius</ce:surname><ce:given-name>P</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting full fixed prostheses. Part II: prosthetic aspects</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Prosthet Dent</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:series><sb:date>1992</sb:date></sb:issue></sb:host><sb:comment>(in press)</sb:comment></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib9"><ce:label>9.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Lekholm</ce:surname><ce:given-name>U</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Zarb</ce:surname><ce:given-name>G</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Patient selection and preparation</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:edited-book><sb:editors><sb:editor><ce:surname>Brȧnemark</ce:surname><ce:given-name>P-I</ce:given-name></sb:editor><sb:editor><ce:surname>Zarb</ce:surname><ce:given-name>G</ce:given-name></sb:editor><sb:editor><ce:surname>Albrektsson</ce:surname><ce:given-name>T</ce:given-name></sb:editor></sb:editors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Tissue-integrated prosthesis: osseointegration in clinical dentistry</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:date>1985</sb:date><sb:publisher><sb:name>Quintessence Publ Co Inc</sb:name><sb:location>Chicago</sb:location></sb:publisher></sb:edited-book><sb:pages><sb:first-page>199</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>209</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib10"><ce:label>10.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Babbush</ce:surname><ce:given-name>C</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Kent</ce:surname><ce:given-name>J</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Misiek</ce:surname><ce:given-name>D</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Titanium plasma-sprayed (TPS) screw implants for the reconstruction of the edentulous mandible</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Oral Maxillofac Surg</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>44</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1986</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>274</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>282</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib11"><ce:label>11.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Shulman</ce:surname><ce:given-name>L</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Rogoff</ce:surname><ce:given-name>G</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Savitt</ce:surname><ce:given-name>E</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Kent</ce:surname><ce:given-name>R</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Evaluation in reconstructive implantology</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Dent Clin North Am</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>30</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:issue-nr>2</sb:issue-nr><sb:date>1986</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>327</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>349</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib12"><ce:label>12.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Strid</ce:surname><ce:given-name>K-G</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Radiographic procedures</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:edited-book><sb:editors><sb:editor><ce:surname>Brȧnemark</ce:surname><ce:given-name>P-I</ce:given-name></sb:editor><sb:editor><ce:surname>Zarb</ce:surname><ce:given-name>G</ce:given-name></sb:editor><sb:editor><ce:surname>Albrektsson</ce:surname><ce:given-name>T</ce:given-name></sb:editor></sb:editors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:date>1985</sb:date><sb:publisher><sb:name>Quintessence Publ Co Inc</sb:name><sb:location>Chicago</sb:location></sb:publisher></sb:edited-book><sb:pages><sb:first-page>317</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>327</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib13"><ce:label>13.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>d'Hoedt</ce:surname><ce:given-name>B</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Lukas</ce:surname><ce:given-name>L</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Mu¨hlbradt</ce:surname><ce:given-name>L</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Scholz</ce:surname><ce:given-name>F</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Schulte</ce:surname><ce:given-name>W</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Quante</ce:surname><ce:given-name>F</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Topkaya</ce:surname><ce:given-name>A</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Das Periotestverfahren—Entwicklung und klinische Pru¨fung</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Dtsch Zahna¨rztlz</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>40</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1985</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>113</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>125</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib14"><ce:label>14.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Teerlinck</ce:surname><ce:given-name>J</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Quirynen</ce:surname><ce:given-name>M</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Darius</ce:surname><ce:given-name>P</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>van Steenberghe</ce:surname><ce:given-name>D</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Periotest: an objective clinical diagnosis of bone apposition towards implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>6</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1991</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>55</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>61</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib15"><ce:label>15.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Colton</ce:surname><ce:given-name>T</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Statistics in medicine</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:edited-book><sb:date>1974</sb:date><sb:publisher><sb:name>Little Brown & Co</sb:name><sb:location>Boston</sb:location></sb:publisher></sb:edited-book><sb:pages><sb:first-page>243</sb:first-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib16"><ce:label>16.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Brȧnemark</ce:surname><ce:given-name>P-I</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Breine</ce:surname><ce:given-name>U</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Lundstro¨m</ce:surname><ce:given-name>J</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Adell</ce:surname><ce:given-name>R</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Hansson</ce:surname><ce:given-name>BO</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Ohlsson</ce:surname><ce:given-name>ȧ</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>3</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1969</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>81</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>100</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib17"><ce:label>17.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Roberts</ce:surname><ce:given-name>WE</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Smith</ce:surname><ce:given-name>RK</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Zilberman</ce:surname><ce:given-name>Y</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Mozsary</ce:surname><ce:given-name>PG</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Smith</ce:surname><ce:given-name>RS</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Am J Orthod</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>86</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1984</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>95</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>111</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib18"><ce:label>18.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Brunski</ce:surname><ce:given-name>JB</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Biomaterials and biomechanics in dental implant design</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>3</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1988</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>85</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>97</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib19"><ce:label>19.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>van Steenberghe</ce:surname><ce:given-name>D</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Lekholm</ce:surname><ce:given-name>U</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Bolender</ce:surname><ce:given-name>C</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:et-al></sb:et-al></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>The applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: a prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>5</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1990</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>272</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>281</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib20"><ce:label>20.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Naert</ce:surname><ce:given-name>I</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Quirynen</ce:surname><ce:given-name>M</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>van Steenberghe</ce:surname><ce:given-name>D</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Darius</ce:surname><ce:given-name>P</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>A six-year prosthodontic study of 509 consecutively inserted implants for the treatment of partial edentulism</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Prosthet Dent</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>67</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1992</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>236</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>245</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib21"><ce:label>21.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Adell</ce:surname><ce:given-name>R</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Lekholm</ce:surname><ce:given-name>U</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Rockler</ce:surname><ce:given-name>B</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Bra¨nemark</ce:surname><ce:given-name>P-I</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Lindhe</ce:surname><ce:given-name>J</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Eriksson</ce:surname><ce:given-name>B</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Sbordone</ce:surname><ce:given-name>L</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures. I. A 3-year longitudinal prospective study</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>1</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1986</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>39</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>52</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib22"><ce:label>22.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Lekholm</ce:surname><ce:given-name>U</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Adell</ce:surname><ce:given-name>R</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Lindhe</ce:surname><ce:given-name>J</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:et-al></sb:et-al></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures. II. A cross-sectional retrospective study</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>15</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1986</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>53</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>61</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib23"><ce:label>23.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Cox</ce:surname><ce:given-name>JF</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Zarb</ce:surname><ce:given-name>GA</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>The longitudinal clinical efficacy of osseointegrated dental implants. A 3-year report</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>2</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1987</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>91</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>100</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib24"><ce:label>24.</ce:label><ce:other-ref><ce:textref>Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D, Teerlinck J, Dekeyser C, Theuniers G. Periodontal aspects of osseointegrated fixtures supporting an overdenture: a 4-years retrospective study. J Clin Periodontol (In press).</ce:textref></ce:other-ref></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib25"><ce:label>25.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Naert</ce:surname><ce:given-name>I</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Quirynen</ce:surname><ce:given-name>M</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Theuniers</ce:surname><ce:given-name>G</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>van Steenberghe</ce:surname><ce:given-name>D</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Prosthetic aspects of osseointegrated fixtures supporting overdentures: a 4-year report</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Prosthet Dent</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>65</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1991</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>671</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>680</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib26"><ce:label>26.</ce:label><ce:other-ref><ce:textref>Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D, Dekeyser C, Callens A. Periodontal aspects of osseointegrated fixtures supporting a partial bridge: an up to 6-years retrospective study. J Clin Periodontol (In press).</ce:textref></ce:other-ref></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib27"><ce:label>27.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Lindquist</ce:surname><ce:given-name>LW</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Rockler</ce:surname><ce:given-name>B</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Carlsson</ce:surname><ce:given-name>GE</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Bone resorption around fixtures in edentulous patients treated with mandibular fixed tissue-integrated prostheses</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Prosthet Dent</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>59</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1988</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>59</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>63</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib28"><ce:label>28.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Ahlqvist</ce:surname><ce:given-name>J</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Borg</ce:surname><ce:given-name>K</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Gunne</ce:surname><ce:given-name>J</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Nilson</ce:surname><ce:given-name>H</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Olsson</ce:surname><ce:given-name>M</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>A´strand</ce:surname><ce:given-name>P</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Osseointegrated implants in edentulous jaws: a 2-year longitudinal study</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>5</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1990</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>155</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>163</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib29"><ce:label>29.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Johansson</ce:surname><ce:given-name>C</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Albrektsson</ce:surname><ce:given-name>T</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Integration of screw implants in the rabbit: a 1-year follow-up of removal torque of titanium implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>2</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1987</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>69</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>75</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference></ce:bibliography-sec></ce:bibliography></tail></article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed prostheses. Part I: Periodontal aspects</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA"><title>A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed prostheses. Part I: Periodontal aspects</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Quirynen</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart><affiliation>Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><description>Professor, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">I.</namePart><namePart type="family">Naert</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart><affiliation>Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><description>Reprint requests to: Dr. I. Naert Department of Prosthetic Dentistry School of Dentistry Faculty of Medicine Catholic University of Leuven Capucijnenvoer 7 B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.</description><description>Professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">D.</namePart><namePart type="family">van Steenberghe</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">MD, PhD</namePart><affiliation>Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><description>Professor and Head, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">L.</namePart><namePart type="family">Nys</namePart><affiliation>Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><description>Researcher, Laboratory for Statistics and Experimental Design, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Heverlee.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1992</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1992</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><abstract lang="en">Abstract: Ninety-one consecutive edentulous patients who had been treated by means of fixed prostheses (n = 103) supported by Brȧnemark implants (n = 589) were examined. Eighteen fixtures (3%) failed to integrate. After a mean loading time of 32 (range 6 to 80) and 38 months (range 5 to 83) for fixtures in the maxilla and mandible, respectively, an additional 12 fixtures lost integration. The cumulative failure rate for individual fixtures after 6 years was 8.4% and 5% for maxillae and mandibles, respectively. Only one patient had to revert to complete dentures. For fixtures in the maxillae, the mean marginal bone loss was 0.7, 0.1, and 0.2 mm for each of the first 3 years of loading, respectively; for fixtures in mandibles, the corresponding values were 0.7, 0.2, and 0.1 mm. The loss in marginal bone height was equal in both jaws and was not related to bleeding on probing or to the preoperative resorption anatomy.</abstract><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Maxillofacial prosthetics and dental implants</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>YMPR</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">199210</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0022-3913</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0022-3913(05)X8124-0</identifier><part><date>199210</date><detail type="volume"><number>68</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>4</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue-pages"><start>569</start><end>720</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>655</start><end>663</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">3F26E8181797757FB6C91318BB2D6CBE63F024CF</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/6H6-07B67QR2-9</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1016/0022-3913(92)90383-L</identifier><identifier type="PII">0022-3913(92)90383-L</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">9290383L</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">©1992 The C. V. Mosby Company</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-HKKZVM7B-M">elsevier</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>The C. V. Mosby Company, ©1992</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/3F26E8181797757FB6C91318BB2D6CBE63F024CF/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001F04 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001F04 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:3F26E8181797757FB6C91318BB2D6CBE63F024CF
|texte= A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed prostheses. Part I: Periodontal aspects
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |