Resilient liner vs. clip attachment effect on peri‐implant tissues of bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture: a 1‐year clinical and radiographical study
Identifieur interne : 001E33 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001E32; suivant : 001E34Resilient liner vs. clip attachment effect on peri‐implant tissues of bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture: a 1‐year clinical and radiographical study
Auteurs : Moustafa Abdou Elsyad ; Ali Hamed El ShoukoukiSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2010-05.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Acrylic resin, Attachment, Batenburg, Bone loss, Bone losses, Clin, Clip, Clip attachment, Clip attachment effect, Dentistry, Denture, Denture base, Elsyad, Female housing, Gingival, Gingival scores, Hblo, Horizontal bone levels, Impl, Implant, Implant overdentures, Implants research, Independent samples, Insertion, International journal, John wiley sons, Liner, Mandibular, Mandibular dentures, Mandibular overdenture, Mandibular overdentures, Maxillofacial, Median, Median group, Microbial adhesion, Moustafa abdou elsyad, Multivariate analysis, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Overdenture, Overdenture insertion, Overdentures, Plaque, Plaque accumulation, Plaque scores, Prospective study, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthodontics, Radiograph, Radiographical, Resilient, Resilient liner, Resilient liner attachment, Resilient liners, Same group, Shoukouki, Soft liner.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Acrylic resin, Attachment, Batenburg, Bone loss, Bone losses, Clin, Clip, Clip attachment, Clip attachment effect, Dentistry, Denture, Denture base, Elsyad, Female housing, Gingival, Gingival scores, Hblo, Horizontal bone levels, Impl, Implant, Implant overdentures, Implants research, Independent samples, Insertion, International journal, John wiley sons, Liner, Mandibular, Mandibular dentures, Mandibular overdenture, Mandibular overdentures, Maxillofacial, Median, Median group, Microbial adhesion, Moustafa abdou elsyad, Multivariate analysis, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Overdenture, Overdenture insertion, Overdentures, Plaque, Plaque accumulation, Plaque scores, Prospective study, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthodontics, Radiograph, Radiographical, Resilient, Resilient liner, Resilient liner attachment, Resilient liners, Same group, Shoukouki, Soft liner.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare between the effects of resilient liner and clip attachments of bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture on peri‐implant tissues.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01879.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:3DF102381EB763A0C57B7267CA0578F2E7DDB1ADLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Resilient liner vs. clip attachment effect on peri‐implant tissues of bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture: a 1‐year clinical and radiographical study</title><author><name sortKey="Elsyad, Moustafa Abdou" sort="Elsyad, Moustafa Abdou" uniqKey="Elsyad M" first="Moustafa Abdou" last="Elsyad">Moustafa Abdou Elsyad</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Removable Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Eldakahlia, Egypt</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Shoukouki, Ali Hamed El" sort="Shoukouki, Ali Hamed El" uniqKey="Shoukouki A" first="Ali Hamed El" last="Shoukouki">Ali Hamed El Shoukouki</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Removable Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Eldakahlia, Egypt</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:3DF102381EB763A0C57B7267CA0578F2E7DDB1AD</idno><date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01879.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/3DF102381EB763A0C57B7267CA0578F2E7DDB1AD/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001E33</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001E33</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Resilient liner vs. clip attachment effect on peri‐implant tissues of bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture: a 1‐year clinical and radiographical study</title><author><name sortKey="Elsyad, Moustafa Abdou" sort="Elsyad, Moustafa Abdou" uniqKey="Elsyad M" first="Moustafa Abdou" last="Elsyad">Moustafa Abdou Elsyad</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Removable Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Eldakahlia, Egypt</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Shoukouki, Ali Hamed El" sort="Shoukouki, Ali Hamed El" uniqKey="Shoukouki A" first="Ali Hamed El" last="Shoukouki">Ali Hamed El Shoukouki</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Removable Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Eldakahlia, Egypt</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">21</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="473">473</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="480">480</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-05">2010-05</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Acrylic resin</term><term>Attachment</term><term>Batenburg</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone losses</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clip</term><term>Clip attachment</term><term>Clip attachment effect</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture base</term><term>Elsyad</term><term>Female housing</term><term>Gingival</term><term>Gingival scores</term><term>Hblo</term><term>Horizontal bone levels</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant overdentures</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Independent samples</term><term>Insertion</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Liner</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular dentures</term><term>Mandibular overdenture</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Median</term><term>Median group</term><term>Microbial adhesion</term><term>Moustafa abdou elsyad</term><term>Multivariate analysis</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdenture insertion</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Plaque</term><term>Plaque accumulation</term><term>Plaque scores</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Prosthodontics</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographical</term><term>Resilient</term><term>Resilient liner</term><term>Resilient liner attachment</term><term>Resilient liners</term><term>Same group</term><term>Shoukouki</term><term>Soft liner</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Acrylic resin</term><term>Attachment</term><term>Batenburg</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone losses</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clip</term><term>Clip attachment</term><term>Clip attachment effect</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture base</term><term>Elsyad</term><term>Female housing</term><term>Gingival</term><term>Gingival scores</term><term>Hblo</term><term>Horizontal bone levels</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant overdentures</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Independent samples</term><term>Insertion</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Liner</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular dentures</term><term>Mandibular overdenture</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Median</term><term>Median group</term><term>Microbial adhesion</term><term>Moustafa abdou elsyad</term><term>Multivariate analysis</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdenture insertion</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Plaque</term><term>Plaque accumulation</term><term>Plaque scores</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Prosthodontics</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographical</term><term>Resilient</term><term>Resilient liner</term><term>Resilient liner attachment</term><term>Resilient liners</term><term>Same group</term><term>Shoukouki</term><term>Soft liner</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare between the effects of resilient liner and clip attachments of bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture on peri‐implant tissues.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>overdenture</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>resilient</json:string><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>overdentures</json:string><json:string>gingival</json:string><json:string>overdenture insertion</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>gingival scores</json:string><json:string>radiographical</json:string><json:string>radiograph</json:string><json:string>plaque scores</json:string><json:string>mandibular overdentures</json:string><json:string>elsyad</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>shoukouki</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>clip attachment effect</json:string><json:string>batenburg</json:string><json:string>mandibular overdenture</json:string><json:string>insertion</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>resilient liner</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>impl</json:string><json:string>hblo</json:string><json:string>clip attachment</json:string><json:string>prosthodontics</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>resilient liners</json:string><json:string>resilient liner attachment</json:string><json:string>horizontal bone levels</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>soft liner</json:string><json:string>same group</json:string><json:string>plaque</json:string><json:string>liner</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>independent samples</json:string><json:string>bone losses</json:string><json:string>microbial adhesion</json:string><json:string>denture base</json:string><json:string>plaque accumulation</json:string><json:string>attachment</json:string><json:string>median</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>moustafa abdou elsyad</json:string><json:string>female housing</json:string><json:string>median group</json:string><json:string>mandibular dentures</json:string><json:string>implant overdentures</json:string><json:string>acrylic resin</json:string><json:string>multivariate analysis</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>clip</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Moustafa Abdou Elsyad</name><affiliations><json:string>Removable Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Eldakahlia, Egypt</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Ali Hamed EL Shoukouki</name><affiliations><json:string>Removable Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Eldakahlia, Egypt</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>mandibular</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>overdenture</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>resilient liners</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>tissues</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR1879</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-ZPNMQGM1-8</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare between the effects of resilient liner and clip attachments of bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture on peri‐implant tissues.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.254</score><pdfWordCount>4954</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>33163</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>25</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>177</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Resilient liner vs. clip attachment effect on peri‐implant tissues of bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture: a 1‐year clinical and radiographical study</title><pmid><json:string>20443800</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>21</volume><issue>5</issue><pages><first>473</first><last>480</last><total>8</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>from August 2004 to May 2005</json:string><json:string>2010</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>SPSS Inc., Chicago</json:string><json:string>Moustafa Abdou Elsyad Removable Prosthodontic Department Faculty of Dentistry Mansoura University PO Box</json:string><json:string>Biostat Inc.</json:string><json:string>The International Journal</json:string><json:string>Dakahlia Egypt Tel</json:string><json:string>Kodak Co., Rochester</json:string><json:string>Zimmer Inc.</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Vita Zahnfabrik</json:string><json:string>EL Shoukouki</json:string><json:string>Foad El</json:string><json:string>Moustafa Abdou</json:string><json:string>Hamed EL Shoukouki</json:string><json:string>I. Prevalence</json:string><json:string>Mohamed Basal</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Berlin</json:string><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>UK</json:string><json:string>London</json:string><json:string>Liechtenstein</json:string><json:string>Bologna</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>Bad Sa</json:string><json:string>NJ</json:string><json:string>Italy</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Schaan</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Adrian et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Esfahani et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Lachmann et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Batenburg et al. 1998a, 1998b</json:string><json:string>Walter et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Kapur & Garrett 1988</json:string><json:string>Assad et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Heckmann et al. (2004)</json:string><json:string>Visser et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Grondahl et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Joseph et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Sesma et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Haas et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Oetterli et al. 2001</json:string><json:string>Sesma et al. (2005)</json:string><json:string>Naert et al. 2004a, 2004b</json:string><json:string>Fanuscu & Caputo 2004</json:string><json:string>Nevzatoglu et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Preiskel 1985</json:string><json:string>Frederiksen 1995</json:string><json:string>Tokuhisa et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Shaygan et al. 1993</json:string><json:string>KiatAmnuay et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Reitz et al. 1980</json:string><json:string>Olan-Rodriguez et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Kawano et al. 1993</json:string><json:string>Wismeijer et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Shaygan et al. (1993)</json:string><json:string>Meijer et al. (2004)</json:string><json:string>Wright 1976</json:string><json:string>Fundeanu et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Eickholz et al. 2001</json:string><json:string>Jacobs et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Jemt et al. (1996)</json:string><json:string>Kiat-Amnuay et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Batenburg et al. (1994)</json:string><json:string>Davis et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Block et al. 1990</json:string><json:string>Mombelli et al. (1987)</json:string><json:string>Badawy & El-Sherbiny 1992</json:string><json:string>Walter et al. (2000)</json:string><json:string>Visser et al. (2005)</json:string><json:string>Wismeijer et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Naert et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Heckmann et al. 2001</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-ZPNMQGM1-8</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2010</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2010</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01879.x</json:string></doi><id>3DF102381EB763A0C57B7267CA0578F2E7DDB1AD</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/3DF102381EB763A0C57B7267CA0578F2E7DDB1AD/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/3DF102381EB763A0C57B7267CA0578F2E7DDB1AD/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/3DF102381EB763A0C57B7267CA0578F2E7DDB1AD/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Resilient liner vs. clip attachment effect on peri‐implant tissues of bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture: a 1‐year clinical and radiographical study</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2010-05"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Resilient liner vs. clip attachment effect on peri‐implant tissues of bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture: a 1‐year clinical and radiographical study</title><title level="a" type="short">Resilient liner vs· clip attachment effect on peri‐implant tissues</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Moustafa Abdou</forename><surname>Elsyad</surname></persName><affiliation>Removable Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Eldakahlia, Egypt<address><country key="EG"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Ali Hamed EL</forename><surname>Shoukouki</surname></persName><affiliation>Removable Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Eldakahlia, Egypt<address><country key="EG"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">3DF102381EB763A0C57B7267CA0578F2E7DDB1AD</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-ZPNMQGM1-8</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01879.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR1879</idno><idno type="supplier">1879</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR1879.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2010.21.issue-5</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">21</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="473">473</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="480">480</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-05"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p><hi rend="bold">Purpose: </hi> The aim of this study was to compare between the effects of resilient liner and clip attachments of bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture on peri‐implant tissues.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and methods: </hi> In a randomized‐controlled clinical trial, 30 edentulous male patients (mean age 62.5 years) were equally assigned to two groups. In each patient, two implants were inserted in the canine area of the mandible using a two‐stage surgical protocol. After 3 months, the implants were connected with resilient bars. Mandibular overdentures were retained to the bars with either clips (group I) or silicone‐resilient liners (group II). Peri‐implant tissues were evaluated clinically (with regard to plaque scores, gingival scores and probing depths) and radiographically (with regard to peri‐implant vertical and horizontal alveolar bone changes). Evaluations were performed at the time of overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T6) and 12 months (T12) after overdenture insertion.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi> After 12 months of using bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture, the resilient liner attachment had significantly decreased peri‐implant plaque score, gingival score, probing depth, vertical and horizontal bone loss when compared with the clip attachment.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion: </hi> Within the limitations of this study, and in terms of peri‐implant tissue health of bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture, we recommend resilient liner rather than clip attachment.</p><p>
<hi rend="bold">To cite this article:</hi>
Elsyad MA, EL Shoukouki AH. Resilient liner vs. clip attachment effect on peri‐implant tissues of bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture: a 1‐year clinical and radiographical study.
<hi rend="italic">Clin. Oral Impl. Res</hi>. <hi rend="bold">21</hi>, 2010; 473–480
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01879.x</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">implant</term><term xml:id="k2">mandibular</term><term xml:id="k3">overdenture</term><term xml:id="k4">resilient liners</term><term xml:id="k5">tissues</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/3DF102381EB763A0C57B7267CA0578F2E7DDB1AD/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="05005"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2010.21.issue-5</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="21">21</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="5">5</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2010-05">May 2010</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="3" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01879.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR1879"></id><id type="supplier" value="1879"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="8"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-03-19"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2010-04-07"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.5 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-04-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="473">473</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="480">480</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><b>Correspondence to:</b>
<i>Moustafa Abdou Elsyad</i>
Removable Prosthodontic Department
Faculty of Dentistry
Mansoura University
PO Box 35516
68 EL Gomhoria street
EL Mansoura
EL Dakahlia
Egypt
Tel.: +0572353238
Fax: +502260173
e‐mail: <email normalForm="m_syad@mans.edu.eg">m_syad@mans.edu.eg</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR1879.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Date:</b> Accepted 20 October 2009</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="4"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="5"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="44"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="6787"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="60"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Resilient liner vs. clip attachment effect on peri‐implant tissues of bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture: a 1‐year clinical and radiographical study</title><title type="shortAuthors">Elsyad & EL Shoukouki</title><title type="short">Resilient liner vs· clip attachment effect on peri‐implant tissues</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Moustafa Abdou</givenNames><familyName>Elsyad</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Ali Hamed EL</givenNames><familyName>Shoukouki</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="EG"><unparsedAffiliation>Removable Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Eldakahlia, Egypt</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">implant</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">mandibular</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">overdenture</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">resilient liners</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">tissues</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p><b>Purpose: </b> The aim of this study was to compare between the effects of resilient liner and clip attachments of bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture on peri‐implant tissues.</p><p><b>Materials and methods: </b> In a randomized‐controlled clinical trial, 30 edentulous male patients (mean age 62.5 years) were equally assigned to two groups. In each patient, two implants were inserted in the canine area of the mandible using a two‐stage surgical protocol. After 3 months, the implants were connected with resilient bars. Mandibular overdentures were retained to the bars with either clips (group I) or silicone‐resilient liners (group II). Peri‐implant tissues were evaluated clinically (with regard to plaque scores, gingival scores and probing depths) and radiographically (with regard to peri‐implant vertical and horizontal alveolar bone changes). Evaluations were performed at the time of overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T6) and 12 months (T12) after overdenture insertion.</p><p><b>Results: </b> After 12 months of using bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture, the resilient liner attachment had significantly decreased peri‐implant plaque score, gingival score, probing depth, vertical and horizontal bone loss when compared with the clip attachment.</p><p><b>Conclusion: </b> Within the limitations of this study, and in terms of peri‐implant tissue health of bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture, we recommend resilient liner rather than clip attachment.</p><p> <b>To cite this article:</b>
Elsyad MA, EL Shoukouki AH. Resilient liner vs. clip attachment effect on peri‐implant tissues of bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture: a 1‐year clinical and radiographical study.
<i>Clin. Oral Impl. Res</i>. <b>21</b>, 2010; 473–480
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01879.x</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Resilient liner vs. clip attachment effect on peri‐implant tissues of bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture: a 1‐year clinical and radiographical study</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Resilient liner vs· clip attachment effect on peri‐implant tissues</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Resilient liner vs. clip attachment effect on peri‐implant tissues of bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture: a 1‐year clinical and radiographical study</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Moustafa Abdou</namePart><namePart type="family">Elsyad</namePart><affiliation>Removable Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Eldakahlia, Egypt</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Ali Hamed EL</namePart><namePart type="family">Shoukouki</namePart><affiliation>Removable Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Eldakahlia, Egypt</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2010-05</dateIssued><edition>Date: Accepted 20 October 2009</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">4</extent><extent unit="tables">5</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">44</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">60</extent><extent unit="words">6787</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare between the effects of resilient liner and clip attachments of bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture on peri‐implant tissues.</abstract><abstract>Materials and methods: In a randomized‐controlled clinical trial, 30 edentulous male patients (mean age 62.5 years) were equally assigned to two groups. In each patient, two implants were inserted in the canine area of the mandible using a two‐stage surgical protocol. After 3 months, the implants were connected with resilient bars. Mandibular overdentures were retained to the bars with either clips (group I) or silicone‐resilient liners (group II). Peri‐implant tissues were evaluated clinically (with regard to plaque scores, gingival scores and probing depths) and radiographically (with regard to peri‐implant vertical and horizontal alveolar bone changes). Evaluations were performed at the time of overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T6) and 12 months (T12) after overdenture insertion.</abstract><abstract>Results: After 12 months of using bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture, the resilient liner attachment had significantly decreased peri‐implant plaque score, gingival score, probing depth, vertical and horizontal bone loss when compared with the clip attachment.</abstract><abstract>Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, and in terms of peri‐implant tissue health of bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture, we recommend resilient liner rather than clip attachment.</abstract><abstract>To cite this article:
Elsyad MA, EL Shoukouki AH. Resilient liner vs. clip attachment effect on peri‐implant tissues of bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture: a 1‐year clinical and radiographical study.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21, 2010; 473–480
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01879.x</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>implant</topic><topic>mandibular</topic><topic>overdenture</topic><topic>resilient liners</topic><topic>tissues</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2010</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>21</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>5</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>473</start><end>480</end><total>8</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">3DF102381EB763A0C57B7267CA0578F2E7DDB1AD</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-ZPNMQGM1-8</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01879.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR1879</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/3DF102381EB763A0C57B7267CA0578F2E7DDB1AD/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001E33 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001E33 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:3DF102381EB763A0C57B7267CA0578F2E7DDB1AD
|texte= Resilient liner vs. clip attachment effect on peri‐implant tissues of bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture: a 1‐year clinical and radiographical study
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |