A novel computational method for real‐time preoperative assessment of primary dental implant stability
Identifieur interne : 001D01 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001D00; suivant : 001D02A novel computational method for real‐time preoperative assessment of primary dental implant stability
Auteurs : Sigbj Rn Olsen ; Stephen J. Ferguson ; Christian Sigrist ; Wolf-Rüdiger Fritz ; Lutz P. Nolte ; Wock Hallermann ; Marco CaversaccioSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2005-02.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Alpha alloy, Anatomical landmarks, Axial, Axial direction, Benchmark model, Biomechanics, Bone density, Bone ingrowth, Bone interface, Bone quality, Carter hayes, Clin, Compressive stiffness, Cortical shell, Dental biomechanics, Ducial markers, Elastic stiffness, Endosseous implants, Experimental results, Experimental testing, Good correlation, Host bone, Immediate implant loading, Impl, Implant, Implant geometry, Implant length, Implant stability, Implant surgery, Implants research, Institut straumann, Interface, Load transfer, Mandible, Mathematical problem, Methodology, Modeling, Nite, Nite element analysis, Nite element method, Nite element solver, Novel methodology, Numerical analysis, Numerical model, Numerical validation, Olsen, Optimized, Optimized model, Optimized modeling methodology, Oral impl, Oral implantology, Oral implants, Parametric analysis, Planning software, Planning stage, Polymethyl methacrylate, Porcine mandible, Preoperative, Preoperative assessment, Preoperative planning, Real time, Regional stiffness, Results show, Shear stiffness, Solid line, Solid model, Solver, Stiffness, Straumann itit, Structural analysis, Surgery, Surgical, Surgical planning, Vander sloten.
- Teeft :
- Alpha alloy, Anatomical landmarks, Axial, Axial direction, Benchmark model, Biomechanics, Bone density, Bone ingrowth, Bone interface, Bone quality, Carter hayes, Clin, Compressive stiffness, Cortical shell, Dental biomechanics, Ducial markers, Elastic stiffness, Endosseous implants, Experimental results, Experimental testing, Good correlation, Host bone, Immediate implant loading, Impl, Implant, Implant geometry, Implant length, Implant stability, Implant surgery, Implants research, Institut straumann, Interface, Load transfer, Mandible, Mathematical problem, Methodology, Modeling, Nite, Nite element analysis, Nite element method, Nite element solver, Novel methodology, Numerical analysis, Numerical model, Numerical validation, Olsen, Optimized, Optimized model, Optimized modeling methodology, Oral impl, Oral implantology, Oral implants, Parametric analysis, Planning software, Planning stage, Polymethyl methacrylate, Porcine mandible, Preoperative, Preoperative assessment, Preoperative planning, Real time, Regional stiffness, Results show, Shear stiffness, Solid line, Solid model, Solver, Stiffness, Straumann itit, Structural analysis, Surgery, Surgical, Surgical planning, Vander sloten.
Abstract
Abstract: A novel methodology which allows for fast and fully automatic structural analysis during preoperative planning for dental implant surgery is presented. This method integrates a fully automatic fast finite element solver within the framework of new concepts in computer‐assisted preoperative planning for implant surgery. The planning system including optimized structural planning was validated by experimental results. Nine implants were placed in pig mandibles and mechanically loaded using a testing rig. The resulting displacements were measured and compared with those predicted by numerical analysis during planning. The results show that there were no statistically significant differences (P=0.65) between the results of the models and the experiments. The results show that fast structural analysis can be integrated with surgical planning software allowing the initial axial implant stability to be predicted in real time during planning. It is believed that such a system could be used to select patients for immediate implant loading and, when further developed, be useful in other areas of preoperative surgical planning.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01071.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:3B5B3A8A0EADF17EF378D01DA9EB8515B1D66521Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A novel computational method for real‐time preoperative assessment of primary dental implant stability</title><author><name sortKey="Olsen, Sigbj Rn" sort="Olsen, Sigbj Rn" uniqKey="Olsen S" first="Sigbj Rn" last="Olsen">Sigbj Rn Olsen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>M. E. Müller Research Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ferguson, Stephen J" sort="Ferguson, Stephen J" uniqKey="Ferguson S" first="Stephen J." last="Ferguson">Stephen J. Ferguson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>M. E. Müller Research Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sigrist, Christian" sort="Sigrist, Christian" uniqKey="Sigrist C" first="Christian" last="Sigrist">Christian Sigrist</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>M. E. Müller Research Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Fritz, Wolf Diger" sort="Fritz, Wolf Diger" uniqKey="Fritz W" first="Wolf-Rüdiger" last="Fritz">Wolf-Rüdiger Fritz</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>M. E. Müller Research Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nolte, Lutz P" sort="Nolte, Lutz P" uniqKey="Nolte L" first="Lutz P." last="Nolte">Lutz P. Nolte</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>M. E. Müller Research Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hallermann, Wock" sort="Hallermann, Wock" uniqKey="Hallermann W" first="Wock" last="Hallermann">Wock Hallermann</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of ENT, Cranio Maxillofacial Surgery, Inselspital, University of Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Caversaccio, Marco" sort="Caversaccio, Marco" uniqKey="Caversaccio M" first="Marco" last="Caversaccio">Marco Caversaccio</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of ENT, Cranio Maxillofacial Surgery, Inselspital, University of Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:3B5B3A8A0EADF17EF378D01DA9EB8515B1D66521</idno><date when="2005" year="2005">2005</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01071.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/3B5B3A8A0EADF17EF378D01DA9EB8515B1D66521/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001D01</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001D01</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A novel computational method for real‐time preoperative assessment of primary dental implant stability</title><author><name sortKey="Olsen, Sigbj Rn" sort="Olsen, Sigbj Rn" uniqKey="Olsen S" first="Sigbj Rn" last="Olsen">Sigbj Rn Olsen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>M. E. Müller Research Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ferguson, Stephen J" sort="Ferguson, Stephen J" uniqKey="Ferguson S" first="Stephen J." last="Ferguson">Stephen J. Ferguson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>M. E. Müller Research Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sigrist, Christian" sort="Sigrist, Christian" uniqKey="Sigrist C" first="Christian" last="Sigrist">Christian Sigrist</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>M. E. Müller Research Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Fritz, Wolf Diger" sort="Fritz, Wolf Diger" uniqKey="Fritz W" first="Wolf-Rüdiger" last="Fritz">Wolf-Rüdiger Fritz</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>M. E. Müller Research Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nolte, Lutz P" sort="Nolte, Lutz P" uniqKey="Nolte L" first="Lutz P." last="Nolte">Lutz P. Nolte</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>M. E. Müller Research Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hallermann, Wock" sort="Hallermann, Wock" uniqKey="Hallermann W" first="Wock" last="Hallermann">Wock Hallermann</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of ENT, Cranio Maxillofacial Surgery, Inselspital, University of Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Caversaccio, Marco" sort="Caversaccio, Marco" uniqKey="Caversaccio M" first="Marco" last="Caversaccio">Marco Caversaccio</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of ENT, Cranio Maxillofacial Surgery, Inselspital, University of Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">16</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="53">53</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="59">59</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2005-02">2005-02</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Alpha alloy</term><term>Anatomical landmarks</term><term>Axial</term><term>Axial direction</term><term>Benchmark model</term><term>Biomechanics</term><term>Bone density</term><term>Bone ingrowth</term><term>Bone interface</term><term>Bone quality</term><term>Carter hayes</term><term>Clin</term><term>Compressive stiffness</term><term>Cortical shell</term><term>Dental biomechanics</term><term>Ducial markers</term><term>Elastic stiffness</term><term>Endosseous implants</term><term>Experimental results</term><term>Experimental testing</term><term>Good correlation</term><term>Host bone</term><term>Immediate implant loading</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant geometry</term><term>Implant length</term><term>Implant stability</term><term>Implant surgery</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Institut straumann</term><term>Interface</term><term>Load transfer</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mathematical problem</term><term>Methodology</term><term>Modeling</term><term>Nite</term><term>Nite element analysis</term><term>Nite element method</term><term>Nite element solver</term><term>Novel methodology</term><term>Numerical analysis</term><term>Numerical model</term><term>Numerical validation</term><term>Olsen</term><term>Optimized</term><term>Optimized model</term><term>Optimized modeling methodology</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral implantology</term><term>Oral implants</term><term>Parametric analysis</term><term>Planning software</term><term>Planning stage</term><term>Polymethyl methacrylate</term><term>Porcine mandible</term><term>Preoperative</term><term>Preoperative assessment</term><term>Preoperative planning</term><term>Real time</term><term>Regional stiffness</term><term>Results show</term><term>Shear stiffness</term><term>Solid line</term><term>Solid model</term><term>Solver</term><term>Stiffness</term><term>Straumann itit</term><term>Structural analysis</term><term>Surgery</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical planning</term><term>Vander sloten</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Alpha alloy</term><term>Anatomical landmarks</term><term>Axial</term><term>Axial direction</term><term>Benchmark model</term><term>Biomechanics</term><term>Bone density</term><term>Bone ingrowth</term><term>Bone interface</term><term>Bone quality</term><term>Carter hayes</term><term>Clin</term><term>Compressive stiffness</term><term>Cortical shell</term><term>Dental biomechanics</term><term>Ducial markers</term><term>Elastic stiffness</term><term>Endosseous implants</term><term>Experimental results</term><term>Experimental testing</term><term>Good correlation</term><term>Host bone</term><term>Immediate implant loading</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant geometry</term><term>Implant length</term><term>Implant stability</term><term>Implant surgery</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Institut straumann</term><term>Interface</term><term>Load transfer</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mathematical problem</term><term>Methodology</term><term>Modeling</term><term>Nite</term><term>Nite element analysis</term><term>Nite element method</term><term>Nite element solver</term><term>Novel methodology</term><term>Numerical analysis</term><term>Numerical model</term><term>Numerical validation</term><term>Olsen</term><term>Optimized</term><term>Optimized model</term><term>Optimized modeling methodology</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral implantology</term><term>Oral implants</term><term>Parametric analysis</term><term>Planning software</term><term>Planning stage</term><term>Polymethyl methacrylate</term><term>Porcine mandible</term><term>Preoperative</term><term>Preoperative assessment</term><term>Preoperative planning</term><term>Real time</term><term>Regional stiffness</term><term>Results show</term><term>Shear stiffness</term><term>Solid line</term><term>Solid model</term><term>Solver</term><term>Stiffness</term><term>Straumann itit</term><term>Structural analysis</term><term>Surgery</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical planning</term><term>Vander sloten</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Abstract: A novel methodology which allows for fast and fully automatic structural analysis during preoperative planning for dental implant surgery is presented. This method integrates a fully automatic fast finite element solver within the framework of new concepts in computer‐assisted preoperative planning for implant surgery. The planning system including optimized structural planning was validated by experimental results. Nine implants were placed in pig mandibles and mechanically loaded using a testing rig. The resulting displacements were measured and compared with those predicted by numerical analysis during planning. The results show that there were no statistically significant differences (P=0.65) between the results of the models and the experiments. The results show that fast structural analysis can be integrated with surgical planning software allowing the initial axial implant stability to be predicted in real time during planning. It is believed that such a system could be used to select patients for immediate implant loading and, when further developed, be useful in other areas of preoperative surgical planning.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>nite</json:string><json:string>optimized</json:string><json:string>preoperative</json:string><json:string>stiffness</json:string><json:string>solver</json:string><json:string>optimized model</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>preoperative assessment</json:string><json:string>biomechanics</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>impl</json:string><json:string>implant stability</json:string><json:string>nite element solver</json:string><json:string>elastic stiffness</json:string><json:string>implant surgery</json:string><json:string>structural analysis</json:string><json:string>olsen</json:string><json:string>modeling</json:string><json:string>nite element analysis</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>methodology</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>alpha alloy</json:string><json:string>preoperative planning</json:string><json:string>numerical analysis</json:string><json:string>oral implants</json:string><json:string>host bone</json:string><json:string>optimized modeling methodology</json:string><json:string>planning software</json:string><json:string>cortical shell</json:string><json:string>shear stiffness</json:string><json:string>load transfer</json:string><json:string>endosseous implants</json:string><json:string>nite element method</json:string><json:string>bone interface</json:string><json:string>real time</json:string><json:string>ducial markers</json:string><json:string>numerical model</json:string><json:string>axial</json:string><json:string>interface</json:string><json:string>carter hayes</json:string><json:string>institut straumann</json:string><json:string>solid model</json:string><json:string>axial direction</json:string><json:string>surgical planning</json:string><json:string>bone quality</json:string><json:string>implant geometry</json:string><json:string>mathematical problem</json:string><json:string>bone ingrowth</json:string><json:string>numerical validation</json:string><json:string>benchmark model</json:string><json:string>straumann itit</json:string><json:string>implant length</json:string><json:string>compressive stiffness</json:string><json:string>bone density</json:string><json:string>good correlation</json:string><json:string>experimental testing</json:string><json:string>immediate implant loading</json:string><json:string>results show</json:string><json:string>planning stage</json:string><json:string>porcine mandible</json:string><json:string>anatomical landmarks</json:string><json:string>polymethyl methacrylate</json:string><json:string>novel methodology</json:string><json:string>solid line</json:string><json:string>parametric analysis</json:string><json:string>regional stiffness</json:string><json:string>oral implantology</json:string><json:string>experimental results</json:string><json:string>dental biomechanics</json:string><json:string>vander sloten</json:string><json:string>surgery</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Sigbjørn Olsen</name><affiliations><json:string>M. E. Müller Research Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Stephen J. Ferguson</name><affiliations><json:string>M. E. Müller Research Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Christian Sigrist</name><affiliations><json:string>M. E. Müller Research Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Wolf‐Rüdiger Fritz</name><affiliations><json:string>M. E. Müller Research Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Lutz P. Nolte</name><affiliations><json:string>M. E. Müller Research Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Wock Hallermann</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of ENT, Cranio Maxillofacial Surgery, Inselspital, University of Bern, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Marco Caversaccio</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of ENT, Cranio Maxillofacial Surgery, Inselspital, University of Bern, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>automatic finite element analysis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>computer‐aided planning</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implant</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>immediate/early loading</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR1071</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-1WXNRS63-V</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: A novel methodology which allows for fast and fully automatic structural analysis during preoperative planning for dental implant surgery is presented. This method integrates a fully automatic fast finite element solver within the framework of new concepts in computer‐assisted preoperative planning for implant surgery. The planning system including optimized structural planning was validated by experimental results. Nine implants were placed in pig mandibles and mechanically loaded using a testing rig. The resulting displacements were measured and compared with those predicted by numerical analysis during planning. The results show that there were no statistically significant differences (P=0.65) between the results of the models and the experiments. The results show that fast structural analysis can be integrated with surgical planning software allowing the initial axial implant stability to be predicted in real time during planning. It is believed that such a system could be used to select patients for immediate implant loading and, when further developed, be useful in other areas of preoperative surgical planning.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.411</score><pdfWordCount>4443</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>29064</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595 x 782 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>164</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1144</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>A novel computational method for real‐time preoperative assessment of primary dental implant stability</title><pmid><json:string>15642031</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>53</first><last>59</last><total>7</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2005</json:string><json:string>4461</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>NCCR, CO</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Alpha Alloy</json:string><json:string>H.K.S. Inc</json:string><json:string>The</json:string><json:string>Baiamonte</json:string><json:string>La Tronche</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Minneapolis</json:string><json:string>Berlin</json:string><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Oberdorf</json:string><json:string>Waterloo</json:string><json:string>Canada</json:string><json:string>Leuven</json:string><json:string>France</json:string><json:string>Belgium</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Rieger et al. 1990</json:string><json:string>Futterling 1999</json:string><json:string>Merz et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Berglundh et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Olsen et al</json:string><json:string>Pietrabissa et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Van Oosterwyck et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>SzmuklerMoncler et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Van Oosterwyck et al.</json:string><json:string>Pilliar 1991</json:string><json:string>Misch 1996</json:string><json:string>Carter & Hayes 1977</json:string><json:string>Zannoni et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Soballe et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Bra 1985</json:string><json:string>Holmes & Lofthus 1997</json:string><json:string>Natali & Pavan 2003</json:string><json:string>Gapski et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Olive & Aparicio 1990</json:string><json:string>Baiamonte et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Zienkiewicz & Taylor 1988</json:string><json:string>Jones et al. 2001</json:string><json:string>Wanschitz et al. 2002</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-1WXNRS63-V</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2005</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2005</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01071.x</json:string></doi><id>3B5B3A8A0EADF17EF378D01DA9EB8515B1D66521</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/3B5B3A8A0EADF17EF378D01DA9EB8515B1D66521/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/3B5B3A8A0EADF17EF378D01DA9EB8515B1D66521/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/3B5B3A8A0EADF17EF378D01DA9EB8515B1D66521/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">A novel computational method for real‐time preoperative assessment of primary dental implant stability</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2005-02"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A novel computational method for real‐time preoperative assessment of primary dental implant stability</title><title level="a" type="short">Preoperative assessment of primary dental implant stability</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Sigbjørn</forename><surname>Olsen</surname></persName><affiliation>M. E. Müller Research Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Stephen J.</forename><surname>Ferguson</surname></persName><affiliation>M. E. Müller Research Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Christian</forename><surname>Sigrist</surname></persName><affiliation>M. E. Müller Research Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Wolf‐Rüdiger</forename><surname>Fritz</surname></persName><affiliation>M. E. Müller Research Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Lutz P.</forename><surname>Nolte</surname></persName><affiliation>M. E. Müller Research Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0005"><persName><forename type="first">Wock</forename><surname>Hallermann</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of ENT, Cranio Maxillofacial Surgery, Inselspital, University of Bern, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0006"><persName><forename type="first">Marco</forename><surname>Caversaccio</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of ENT, Cranio Maxillofacial Surgery, Inselspital, University of Bern, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">3B5B3A8A0EADF17EF378D01DA9EB8515B1D66521</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-1WXNRS63-V</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01071.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR1071</idno><idno type="supplier">1071</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR1071.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2005.16.issue-1</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">16</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="53">53</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="59">59</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2005-02"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold">Abstract: </hi> A novel methodology which allows for fast and fully automatic structural analysis during preoperative planning for dental implant surgery is presented. This method integrates a fully automatic fast finite element solver within the framework of new concepts in computer‐assisted preoperative planning for implant surgery. The planning system including optimized structural planning was validated by experimental results. Nine implants were placed in pig mandibles and mechanically loaded using a testing rig. The resulting displacements were measured and compared with those predicted by numerical analysis during planning. The results show that there were no statistically significant differences (<hi rend="italic">P</hi>=0.65) between the results of the models and the experiments. The results show that fast structural analysis can be integrated with surgical planning software allowing the initial axial implant stability to be predicted in real time during planning. It is believed that such a system could be used to select patients for immediate implant loading and, when further developed, be useful in other areas of preoperative surgical planning.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="fr" style="main"><head>Résumé</head><p>Une méthodologie nouvelle permettant l'analyse structurelle complètement automatique et rapide durant le plan de traitement implantaire dentaire est présentée. Cette méthode intègre un système complètement automatique parmi l'ensemble des nouveaux concepts de plan de traitement préopératoire assisté par ordinateur pour la chirurgie implantaire. Le système de plan de traitement comprenant le plan structurel optimal a été validé par des résultats expérimentaux. Neuf implants ont été placés dans les mandibules de porcs et mécaniquement chargés en utilisant une plate‐forme de test. Les déplacements en résultant ont été mesurés et comparés à ceux pronostiqués durant le plan de traitement par l'analyse numérique. Les résultats n'ont montré aucune différence significative (p=0,65) entre les résultats des modèles et des expériences. Les résultats démontraient que l'analyse structurelle rapide pouvait être intégrée dans le traitement chirurgical du logiciel permettant à la stabilité implantaire axiale initiale d'être pronostiquée durant le plan de traitement. Un tel système pourrait être utilisé pour sélectionner les patients candidats à une charge immédiate et, lorsqu'il sera mieux développé, être utilisé dans d'autres aires du plan chirurgical préopératoire.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="de" style="main"><head>Zusammenfassung</head><p>In dieser Studie stellt man eine neue Methode vor, die in der präoperativen Planung der Implantatchirurgie eine schnelle und vollautomatische Strukturanalyse erlaubt. Dabei benützt man im Rahmen eines neuen Konzeptes für die komputerunterstützte präoperative implantatchirurgische Planung einen vollautomatischen Finite‐Element‐Auflöser ein.</p><p>Dieses Planungssystem mit einer verbesserten strukturellen Planung wurde mit experimentellen Untersuchungen überprüft. Man setzte je neun Implantate in den Unterkiefer von Schweinen und belastete sie anschliessend während einer definierten Testphase. Man vermass die auftretenden Verschiebungen und verglich sie mit den in der Planungsphase gesammelten Daten der nummerischen Analyse.</p><p>Die Resultate zeigen, dass keine statistisch signifikanten Unterschiede (<hi rend="italic">P</hi>=0.65) zwischen den Modellberechnungen und den Untersuchungsergebnisse bestehen. Die Resultate zeigen ebenso, dass rasch verfügbare strukurelle Analysen mit einer chirurgischen Planungssoftware, die es erlauben die initiale axiale Implantatstabilität während der Planungsphase in Echtzeit vorauszusagen, integriert werden können. Man glaubt, dass ein solches System dazu verwendet werden könnte, um Patienten, die sich für eine Sofortbelastung der Implantate eignen auszuwählen und, wenn noch weiter entwickelt, auch in anderen Bereichen der präoperativen chirurgischen Planungsphase angewandt werden könnte.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="es" style="main"><head>Resumen</head><p>Se presenta una nueva metodología que permite un rápido y totalmente automático análisis estructural durante la planificación preoperatorio de la cirugía de implantes. Este método integra un solucionador totalmente automático de elemento finito rápido dentro del marco de los nuevos conceptos en planificación computerizada preoperatorio para cirugía de implantes.</p><p>El sistema de planificación incluyendo planificación estructural optimizada fue validado por los resultados experimentales. Se colocaron nueve implantes en mandíbulas de cerdo y se cargaron mecánicamente usando un dispositivo de prueba. Los desplazamientos resultantes fueron medidos y comparados con aquellos predichos por análisis numéricos durante la planificación.</p><p>Los resultados muestran que no hubieron diferencias estadísticamente significativas (<hi rend="italic">P</hi>=0.65) entre los resultados de los modelos y los experimentos. Los resultados muestran que el análisis estructural rápido puede ser integrado con el programa de planificación quirúrgica permitiendo predecir la estabilidad axial inicial del implante en tiempo real durante la planificación. Se cree que tal sistema podría usarse para seleccionar pacientes para implantes de carga inmediata y, con un mayor desarrollo, ser útiles en otras áreas de planificación quirúrgica preoperativa.</p><p>
<graphic url="image_n/CLR_1071_fu1.gif" rend="inline image"></graphic>
</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">automatic finite element analysis</term><term xml:id="k2">computer‐aided planning</term><term xml:id="k3">dental implant</term><term xml:id="k4">immediate/early loading</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/3B5B3A8A0EADF17EF378D01DA9EB8515B1D66521/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="02001"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2005.16.issue-1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="16">16</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2005-02">February 2005</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="7" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01071.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR1071"></id><id type="supplier" value="1071"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="7"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2004-08-13"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2004-08-13"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="53">53</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="59">59</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><b>Correspondence to:</b>
<i>Dr Marco Caversaccio</i>
Department of ENT, Cranio Maxillofacial Surgery
Inselspital
University of Bern
Freiburgstrasse
CH‐3010 Bern
Switzerland
Tel.: +41‐31‐632‐4174
Fax: +41‐31‐632‐4900
e‐mail: <email normalForm="marco.caversaccio@insel.ch">marco.caversaccio@insel.ch</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR1071.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Date</b>:Accepted 19 January 2004</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="5"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="1"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="25"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="5612"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="38"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">A novel computational method for real‐time preoperative assessment of primary dental implant stability</title><title type="shortAuthors">Olsen et al.</title><title type="short">Preoperative assessment of primary dental implant stability</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Sigbjørn</givenNames><familyName>Olsen</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Stephen J.</givenNames><familyName>Ferguson</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Christian</givenNames><familyName>Sigrist</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Wolf‐Rüdiger</givenNames><familyName>Fritz</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Lutz P.</givenNames><familyName>Nolte</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr6" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Wock</givenNames><familyName>Hallermann</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr7" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Marco</givenNames><familyName>Caversaccio</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="CH"><unparsedAffiliation>M. E. Müller Research Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="CH"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of ENT, Cranio Maxillofacial Surgery, Inselspital, University of Bern, Switzerland</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">automatic finite element analysis</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">computer‐aided planning</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">dental implant</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">immediate/early loading</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Abstract: </b> A novel methodology which allows for fast and fully automatic structural analysis during preoperative planning for dental implant surgery is presented. This method integrates a fully automatic fast finite element solver within the framework of new concepts in computer‐assisted preoperative planning for implant surgery. The planning system including optimized structural planning was validated by experimental results. Nine implants were placed in pig mandibles and mechanically loaded using a testing rig. The resulting displacements were measured and compared with those predicted by numerical analysis during planning. The results show that there were no statistically significant differences (<i>P</i>=0.65) between the results of the models and the experiments. The results show that fast structural analysis can be integrated with surgical planning software allowing the initial axial implant stability to be predicted in real time during planning. It is believed that such a system could be used to select patients for immediate implant loading and, when further developed, be useful in other areas of preoperative surgical planning.</p><!--
To cite this article:
Olsen S, Ferguson SJ, Sigrist C, Fritz W-R, Nolte LP, Hallermann W, Caversaccio M. A novel computational method for real-time preoperative assessment of primary dental implant stability.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01071.x
--></abstract><abstract type="main" xml:lang="fr"><title type="main">Résumé</title><p>Une méthodologie nouvelle permettant l'analyse structurelle complètement automatique et rapide durant le plan de traitement implantaire dentaire est présentée. Cette méthode intègre un système complètement automatique parmi l'ensemble des nouveaux concepts de plan de traitement préopératoire assisté par ordinateur pour la chirurgie implantaire. Le système de plan de traitement comprenant le plan structurel optimal a été validé par des résultats expérimentaux. Neuf implants ont été placés dans les mandibules de porcs et mécaniquement chargés en utilisant une plate‐forme de test. Les déplacements en résultant ont été mesurés et comparés à ceux pronostiqués durant le plan de traitement par l'analyse numérique. Les résultats n'ont montré aucune différence significative (p=0,65) entre les résultats des modèles et des expériences. Les résultats démontraient que l'analyse structurelle rapide pouvait être intégrée dans le traitement chirurgical du logiciel permettant à la stabilité implantaire axiale initiale d'être pronostiquée durant le plan de traitement. Un tel système pourrait être utilisé pour sélectionner les patients candidats à une charge immédiate et, lorsqu'il sera mieux développé, être utilisé dans d'autres aires du plan chirurgical préopératoire.</p></abstract><abstract type="main" xml:lang="de"><title type="main">Zusammenfassung</title><p>In dieser Studie stellt man eine neue Methode vor, die in der präoperativen Planung der Implantatchirurgie eine schnelle und vollautomatische Strukturanalyse erlaubt. Dabei benützt man im Rahmen eines neuen Konzeptes für die komputerunterstützte präoperative implantatchirurgische Planung einen vollautomatischen Finite‐Element‐Auflöser ein.</p><p>Dieses Planungssystem mit einer verbesserten strukturellen Planung wurde mit experimentellen Untersuchungen überprüft. Man setzte je neun Implantate in den Unterkiefer von Schweinen und belastete sie anschliessend während einer definierten Testphase. Man vermass die auftretenden Verschiebungen und verglich sie mit den in der Planungsphase gesammelten Daten der nummerischen Analyse.</p><p>Die Resultate zeigen, dass keine statistisch signifikanten Unterschiede (<i>P</i>=0.65) zwischen den Modellberechnungen und den Untersuchungsergebnisse bestehen. Die Resultate zeigen ebenso, dass rasch verfügbare strukurelle Analysen mit einer chirurgischen Planungssoftware, die es erlauben die initiale axiale Implantatstabilität während der Planungsphase in Echtzeit vorauszusagen, integriert werden können. Man glaubt, dass ein solches System dazu verwendet werden könnte, um Patienten, die sich für eine Sofortbelastung der Implantate eignen auszuwählen und, wenn noch weiter entwickelt, auch in anderen Bereichen der präoperativen chirurgischen Planungsphase angewandt werden könnte.</p></abstract><abstract type="main" xml:lang="es"><title type="main">Resumen</title><p>Se presenta una nueva metodología que permite un rápido y totalmente automático análisis estructural durante la planificación preoperatorio de la cirugía de implantes. Este método integra un solucionador totalmente automático de elemento finito rápido dentro del marco de los nuevos conceptos en planificación computerizada preoperatorio para cirugía de implantes.</p><p>El sistema de planificación incluyendo planificación estructural optimizada fue validado por los resultados experimentales. Se colocaron nueve implantes en mandíbulas de cerdo y se cargaron mecánicamente usando un dispositivo de prueba. Los desplazamientos resultantes fueron medidos y comparados con aquellos predichos por análisis numéricos durante la planificación.</p><p>Los resultados muestran que no hubieron diferencias estadísticamente significativas (<i>P</i>=0.65) entre los resultados de los modelos y los experimentos. Los resultados muestran que el análisis estructural rápido puede ser integrado con el programa de planificación quirúrgica permitiendo predecir la estabilidad axial inicial del implante en tiempo real durante la planificación. Se cree que tal sistema podría usarse para seleccionar pacientes para implantes de carga inmediata y, con un mayor desarrollo, ser útiles en otras áreas de planificación quirúrgica preoperativa.</p><p> <inlineGraphic alt="inline image" location="image_n/CLR_1071_fu1.gif" href=""></inlineGraphic> </p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>A novel computational method for real‐time preoperative assessment of primary dental implant stability</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Preoperative assessment of primary dental implant stability</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>A novel computational method for real‐time preoperative assessment of primary dental implant stability</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Sigbjørn</namePart><namePart type="family">Olsen</namePart><affiliation>M. E. Müller Research Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Stephen J.</namePart><namePart type="family">Ferguson</namePart><affiliation>M. E. Müller Research Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Christian</namePart><namePart type="family">Sigrist</namePart><affiliation>M. E. Müller Research Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Wolf‐Rüdiger</namePart><namePart type="family">Fritz</namePart><affiliation>M. E. Müller Research Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Lutz P.</namePart><namePart type="family">Nolte</namePart><affiliation>M. E. Müller Research Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Wock</namePart><namePart type="family">Hallermann</namePart><affiliation>Department of ENT, Cranio Maxillofacial Surgery, Inselspital, University of Bern, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Marco</namePart><namePart type="family">Caversaccio</namePart><affiliation>Department of ENT, Cranio Maxillofacial Surgery, Inselspital, University of Bern, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2005-02</dateIssued><edition>Date:Accepted 19 January 2004</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2005</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">5</extent><extent unit="tables">0</extent><extent unit="formulas">1</extent><extent unit="references">25</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">38</extent><extent unit="words">5612</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Abstract: A novel methodology which allows for fast and fully automatic structural analysis during preoperative planning for dental implant surgery is presented. This method integrates a fully automatic fast finite element solver within the framework of new concepts in computer‐assisted preoperative planning for implant surgery. The planning system including optimized structural planning was validated by experimental results. Nine implants were placed in pig mandibles and mechanically loaded using a testing rig. The resulting displacements were measured and compared with those predicted by numerical analysis during planning. The results show that there were no statistically significant differences (P=0.65) between the results of the models and the experiments. The results show that fast structural analysis can be integrated with surgical planning software allowing the initial axial implant stability to be predicted in real time during planning. It is believed that such a system could be used to select patients for immediate implant loading and, when further developed, be useful in other areas of preoperative surgical planning.</abstract><abstract lang="fr">Une méthodologie nouvelle permettant l'analyse structurelle complètement automatique et rapide durant le plan de traitement implantaire dentaire est présentée. Cette méthode intègre un système complètement automatique parmi l'ensemble des nouveaux concepts de plan de traitement préopératoire assisté par ordinateur pour la chirurgie implantaire. Le système de plan de traitement comprenant le plan structurel optimal a été validé par des résultats expérimentaux. Neuf implants ont été placés dans les mandibules de porcs et mécaniquement chargés en utilisant une plate‐forme de test. Les déplacements en résultant ont été mesurés et comparés à ceux pronostiqués durant le plan de traitement par l'analyse numérique. Les résultats n'ont montré aucune différence significative (p=0,65) entre les résultats des modèles et des expériences. Les résultats démontraient que l'analyse structurelle rapide pouvait être intégrée dans le traitement chirurgical du logiciel permettant à la stabilité implantaire axiale initiale d'être pronostiquée durant le plan de traitement. Un tel système pourrait être utilisé pour sélectionner les patients candidats à une charge immédiate et, lorsqu'il sera mieux développé, être utilisé dans d'autres aires du plan chirurgical préopératoire.</abstract><abstract lang="de">In dieser Studie stellt man eine neue Methode vor, die in der präoperativen Planung der Implantatchirurgie eine schnelle und vollautomatische Strukturanalyse erlaubt. Dabei benützt man im Rahmen eines neuen Konzeptes für die komputerunterstützte präoperative implantatchirurgische Planung einen vollautomatischen Finite‐Element‐Auflöser ein. Dieses Planungssystem mit einer verbesserten strukturellen Planung wurde mit experimentellen Untersuchungen überprüft. Man setzte je neun Implantate in den Unterkiefer von Schweinen und belastete sie anschliessend während einer definierten Testphase. Man vermass die auftretenden Verschiebungen und verglich sie mit den in der Planungsphase gesammelten Daten der nummerischen Analyse. Die Resultate zeigen, dass keine statistisch signifikanten Unterschiede (P=0.65) zwischen den Modellberechnungen und den Untersuchungsergebnisse bestehen. Die Resultate zeigen ebenso, dass rasch verfügbare strukurelle Analysen mit einer chirurgischen Planungssoftware, die es erlauben die initiale axiale Implantatstabilität während der Planungsphase in Echtzeit vorauszusagen, integriert werden können. Man glaubt, dass ein solches System dazu verwendet werden könnte, um Patienten, die sich für eine Sofortbelastung der Implantate eignen auszuwählen und, wenn noch weiter entwickelt, auch in anderen Bereichen der präoperativen chirurgischen Planungsphase angewandt werden könnte.</abstract><abstract lang="es">Se presenta una nueva metodología que permite un rápido y totalmente automático análisis estructural durante la planificación preoperatorio de la cirugía de implantes. Este método integra un solucionador totalmente automático de elemento finito rápido dentro del marco de los nuevos conceptos en planificación computerizada preoperatorio para cirugía de implantes. El sistema de planificación incluyendo planificación estructural optimizada fue validado por los resultados experimentales. Se colocaron nueve implantes en mandíbulas de cerdo y se cargaron mecánicamente usando un dispositivo de prueba. Los desplazamientos resultantes fueron medidos y comparados con aquellos predichos por análisis numéricos durante la planificación. Los resultados muestran que no hubieron diferencias estadísticamente significativas (P=0.65) entre los resultados de los modelos y los experimentos. Los resultados muestran que el análisis estructural rápido puede ser integrado con el programa de planificación quirúrgica permitiendo predecir la estabilidad axial inicial del implante en tiempo real durante la planificación. Se cree que tal sistema podría usarse para seleccionar pacientes para implantes de carga inmediata y, con un mayor desarrollo, ser útiles en otras áreas de planificación quirúrgica preoperativa.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>automatic finite element analysis</topic><topic>computer‐aided planning</topic><topic>dental implant</topic><topic>immediate/early loading</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2005</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>16</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>53</start><end>59</end><total>7</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">3B5B3A8A0EADF17EF378D01DA9EB8515B1D66521</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-1WXNRS63-V</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01071.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR1071</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Munksgaard International Publishers</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/3B5B3A8A0EADF17EF378D01DA9EB8515B1D66521/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001D01 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001D01 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:3B5B3A8A0EADF17EF378D01DA9EB8515B1D66521
|texte= A novel computational method for real‐time preoperative assessment of primary dental implant stability
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |