Satisfaction and psychosocial aspects of patients with an extremely resorbed mandible treated with implant‐retained overdentures
Identifieur interne : 001B68 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001B67; suivant : 001B69Satisfaction and psychosocial aspects of patients with an extremely resorbed mandible treated with implant‐retained overdentures
Auteurs : Kees Stellingsma ; Jelte Bouma ; Boudewijn Stegenga ; Henny J. A. Meijer ; Gerry M. RaghoebarSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2003-04.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Augmentation, Augmentation group, Autologous, Autologous bone graft, Boerrigter, Bosker, Bouma, Clin, Clinical aspects, Clinical trial, Dental implants, Denture, Denture complaints, Denture patients, Denture satisfaction, Edentulous, Edentulous mandible, Edentulous patients, Effect size, Effect sizes, Endosseous, Endosseous implants, Facial appearance, Friatec, Graft, Groningen, Healing phase, Iliac, Iliac crest, Impl, Implant, Interforaminal, Interforaminal region, International journal, Lower denture, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular dentures, Mandibular overdentures, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Maxillofacial surgery, Meijer, Modality, Oral impl, Overall denture satisfaction, Overall denture satisfaction rate, Overdenture, Overdentures, Patient satisfaction, Prosthetic dentistry, Psychological questionnaires, Psychosocial, Psychosocial aspects, Raghoebar, Ranks test, Ranks tests, Resorbed, Resorbed mandible, Scale range, Social activities, Standard deviation, Stellingsma, Subjective parameters, Surgical, Surgical phase, Transmandibular, Transmandibular implant, Treatment groups, Tres, Variance, Wilcoxon.
- Teeft :
- Augmentation, Augmentation group, Autologous, Autologous bone graft, Boerrigter, Bosker, Bouma, Clin, Clinical aspects, Clinical trial, Dental implants, Denture, Denture complaints, Denture patients, Denture satisfaction, Edentulous, Edentulous mandible, Edentulous patients, Effect size, Effect sizes, Endosseous, Endosseous implants, Facial appearance, Friatec, Graft, Groningen, Healing phase, Iliac, Iliac crest, Impl, Implant, Interforaminal, Interforaminal region, International journal, Lower denture, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular dentures, Mandibular overdentures, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Maxillofacial surgery, Meijer, Modality, Oral impl, Overall denture satisfaction, Overall denture satisfaction rate, Overdenture, Overdentures, Patient satisfaction, Prosthetic dentistry, Psychological questionnaires, Psychosocial, Psychosocial aspects, Raghoebar, Ranks test, Ranks tests, Resorbed, Resorbed mandible, Scale range, Social activities, Standard deviation, Stellingsma, Subjective parameters, Surgical, Surgical phase, Transmandibular, Transmandibular implant, Treatment groups, Tres, Variance, Wilcoxon.
Abstract
Abstract: The objective of the present report was to study the effect of implant treatment on subjective parameters in edentulous patients with an extremely resorbed mandible. Three different treatment modalities to support an overdenture were compared: transmandibular implant according to Bosker, augmentation of the mandible followed by four endosseous implants, and the insertion of four short endosseous implants. Sixty patients [50 women and 10 men, mean (± SD) age 59 (± 11) years] met the inclusion criteria and were assigned in one of the three treatment groups. Before treatment and 12 months after placement of the new overdentures, denture satisfaction, psychosocial aspects and experiences during the surgical phase were assessed with a battery of questionnaires. After 1 year, 58 patients were available for evaluation: one patient had died, and one patient had moved out of the region. There was a significant improvement of patient satisfaction and psychosocial functioning in all three treatment groups. At the 1‐year evaluation, differences amongst the three groups were not significant. However, in terms of discomfort and pain during the surgical phase as well as the length of this phase (at least 6 months), the augmentation using an autologous bone graft from the iliac crest followed by inserting four endosseous implants 3 months later appeared the least favorite option of the three modalities studied.
Url:
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140205.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:38932D26BE6F42598190548D1E30C11D09690AB3Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Satisfaction and psychosocial aspects of patients with an extremely resorbed mandible treated with implant‐retained overdentures</title><author><name sortKey="Stellingsma, Kees" sort="Stellingsma, Kees" uniqKey="Stellingsma K" first="Kees" last="Stellingsma">Kees Stellingsma</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Authors' affiliations: Kees Stellingsma, Boudewijn Stegenga, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.Jelte Bouma, Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, State University Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.Henny J. A. Meijer, Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bouma, Jelte" sort="Bouma, Jelte" uniqKey="Bouma J" first="Jelte" last="Bouma">Jelte Bouma</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Authors' affiliations: Kees Stellingsma, Boudewijn Stegenga, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.Jelte Bouma, Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, State University Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.Henny J. A. Meijer, Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Stegenga, Boudewijn" sort="Stegenga, Boudewijn" uniqKey="Stegenga B" first="Boudewijn" last="Stegenga">Boudewijn Stegenga</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Authors' affiliations: Kees Stellingsma, Boudewijn Stegenga, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.Jelte Bouma, Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, State University Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.Henny J. A. Meijer, Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Meijer, Henny J A" sort="Meijer, Henny J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="Henny J. A." last="Meijer">Henny J. A. Meijer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Authors' affiliations: Kees Stellingsma, Boudewijn Stegenga, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.Jelte Bouma, Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, State University Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.Henny J. A. Meijer, Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, Gerry M" sort="Raghoebar, Gerry M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="Gerry M." last="Raghoebar">Gerry M. Raghoebar</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Authors' affiliations: Kees Stellingsma, Boudewijn Stegenga, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.Jelte Bouma, Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, State University Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.Henny J. A. Meijer, Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:38932D26BE6F42598190548D1E30C11D09690AB3</idno><date when="2003" year="2003">2003</date><idno type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140205.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/38932D26BE6F42598190548D1E30C11D09690AB3/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001B68</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001B68</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Satisfaction and psychosocial aspects of patients with an extremely resorbed mandible treated with implant‐retained overdentures</title><author><name sortKey="Stellingsma, Kees" sort="Stellingsma, Kees" uniqKey="Stellingsma K" first="Kees" last="Stellingsma">Kees Stellingsma</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Authors' affiliations: Kees Stellingsma, Boudewijn Stegenga, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.Jelte Bouma, Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, State University Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.Henny J. A. Meijer, Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bouma, Jelte" sort="Bouma, Jelte" uniqKey="Bouma J" first="Jelte" last="Bouma">Jelte Bouma</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Authors' affiliations: Kees Stellingsma, Boudewijn Stegenga, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.Jelte Bouma, Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, State University Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.Henny J. A. Meijer, Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Stegenga, Boudewijn" sort="Stegenga, Boudewijn" uniqKey="Stegenga B" first="Boudewijn" last="Stegenga">Boudewijn Stegenga</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Authors' affiliations: Kees Stellingsma, Boudewijn Stegenga, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.Jelte Bouma, Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, State University Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.Henny J. A. Meijer, Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Meijer, Henny J A" sort="Meijer, Henny J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="Henny J. A." last="Meijer">Henny J. A. Meijer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Authors' affiliations: Kees Stellingsma, Boudewijn Stegenga, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.Jelte Bouma, Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, State University Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.Henny J. A. Meijer, Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, Gerry M" sort="Raghoebar, Gerry M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="Gerry M." last="Raghoebar">Gerry M. Raghoebar</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Authors' affiliations: Kees Stellingsma, Boudewijn Stegenga, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.Jelte Bouma, Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, State University Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.Henny J. A. Meijer, Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="166">166</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="172">172</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-04">2003-04</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Augmentation</term><term>Augmentation group</term><term>Autologous</term><term>Autologous bone graft</term><term>Boerrigter</term><term>Bosker</term><term>Bouma</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical aspects</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture complaints</term><term>Denture patients</term><term>Denture satisfaction</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous mandible</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Effect size</term><term>Effect sizes</term><term>Endosseous</term><term>Endosseous implants</term><term>Facial appearance</term><term>Friatec</term><term>Graft</term><term>Groningen</term><term>Healing phase</term><term>Iliac</term><term>Iliac crest</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Interforaminal</term><term>Interforaminal region</term><term>International journal</term><term>Lower denture</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular dentures</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Meijer</term><term>Modality</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Overall denture satisfaction</term><term>Overall denture satisfaction rate</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Psychological questionnaires</term><term>Psychosocial</term><term>Psychosocial aspects</term><term>Raghoebar</term><term>Ranks test</term><term>Ranks tests</term><term>Resorbed</term><term>Resorbed mandible</term><term>Scale range</term><term>Social activities</term><term>Standard deviation</term><term>Stellingsma</term><term>Subjective parameters</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical phase</term><term>Transmandibular</term><term>Transmandibular implant</term><term>Treatment groups</term><term>Tres</term><term>Variance</term><term>Wilcoxon</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Augmentation</term><term>Augmentation group</term><term>Autologous</term><term>Autologous bone graft</term><term>Boerrigter</term><term>Bosker</term><term>Bouma</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical aspects</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture complaints</term><term>Denture patients</term><term>Denture satisfaction</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous mandible</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Effect size</term><term>Effect sizes</term><term>Endosseous</term><term>Endosseous implants</term><term>Facial appearance</term><term>Friatec</term><term>Graft</term><term>Groningen</term><term>Healing phase</term><term>Iliac</term><term>Iliac crest</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Interforaminal</term><term>Interforaminal region</term><term>International journal</term><term>Lower denture</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular dentures</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Meijer</term><term>Modality</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Overall denture satisfaction</term><term>Overall denture satisfaction rate</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Psychological questionnaires</term><term>Psychosocial</term><term>Psychosocial aspects</term><term>Raghoebar</term><term>Ranks test</term><term>Ranks tests</term><term>Resorbed</term><term>Resorbed mandible</term><term>Scale range</term><term>Social activities</term><term>Standard deviation</term><term>Stellingsma</term><term>Subjective parameters</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical phase</term><term>Transmandibular</term><term>Transmandibular implant</term><term>Treatment groups</term><term>Tres</term><term>Variance</term><term>Wilcoxon</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Abstract: The objective of the present report was to study the effect of implant treatment on subjective parameters in edentulous patients with an extremely resorbed mandible. Three different treatment modalities to support an overdenture were compared: transmandibular implant according to Bosker, augmentation of the mandible followed by four endosseous implants, and the insertion of four short endosseous implants. Sixty patients [50 women and 10 men, mean (± SD) age 59 (± 11) years] met the inclusion criteria and were assigned in one of the three treatment groups. Before treatment and 12 months after placement of the new overdentures, denture satisfaction, psychosocial aspects and experiences during the surgical phase were assessed with a battery of questionnaires. After 1 year, 58 patients were available for evaluation: one patient had died, and one patient had moved out of the region. There was a significant improvement of patient satisfaction and psychosocial functioning in all three treatment groups. At the 1‐year evaluation, differences amongst the three groups were not significant. However, in terms of discomfort and pain during the surgical phase as well as the length of this phase (at least 6 months), the augmentation using an autologous bone graft from the iliac crest followed by inserting four endosseous implants 3 months later appeared the least favorite option of the three modalities studied.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>overdentures</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>treatment groups</json:string><json:string>transmandibular</json:string><json:string>stellingsma</json:string><json:string>resorbed</json:string><json:string>raghoebar</json:string><json:string>psychosocial</json:string><json:string>lower denture</json:string><json:string>resorbed mandible</json:string><json:string>transmandibular implant</json:string><json:string>groningen</json:string><json:string>interforaminal</json:string><json:string>overdenture</json:string><json:string>endosseous</json:string><json:string>interforaminal region</json:string><json:string>iliac crest</json:string><json:string>augmentation</json:string><json:string>meijer</json:string><json:string>effect size</json:string><json:string>autologous</json:string><json:string>autologous bone graft</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial surgery</json:string><json:string>bosker</json:string><json:string>friatec</json:string><json:string>surgical phase</json:string><json:string>bouma</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>denture satisfaction</json:string><json:string>impl</json:string><json:string>endosseous implants</json:string><json:string>tres</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>standard deviation</json:string><json:string>wilcoxon</json:string><json:string>boerrigter</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>denture complaints</json:string><json:string>clinical trial</json:string><json:string>variance</json:string><json:string>subjective parameters</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>graft</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>denture patients</json:string><json:string>facial appearance</json:string><json:string>scale range</json:string><json:string>iliac</json:string><json:string>overall denture satisfaction rate</json:string><json:string>social activities</json:string><json:string>psychosocial aspects</json:string><json:string>ranks tests</json:string><json:string>patient satisfaction</json:string><json:string>mandibular dentures</json:string><json:string>modality</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>effect sizes</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>healing phase</json:string><json:string>edentulous mandible</json:string><json:string>psychological questionnaires</json:string><json:string>overall denture satisfaction</json:string><json:string>clinical aspects</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>mandibular overdentures</json:string><json:string>augmentation group</json:string><json:string>ranks test</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Kees Stellingsma</name><affiliations><json:string>Authors' affiliations: Kees Stellingsma, Boudewijn Stegenga, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.Jelte Bouma, Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, State University Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.Henny J. A. Meijer, Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Jelte Bouma</name><affiliations><json:string>Authors' affiliations: Kees Stellingsma, Boudewijn Stegenga, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.Jelte Bouma, Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, State University Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.Henny J. A. Meijer, Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Boudewijn Stegenga</name><affiliations><json:string>Authors' affiliations: Kees Stellingsma, Boudewijn Stegenga, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.Jelte Bouma, Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, State University Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.Henny J. A. Meijer, Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Henny J. A. Meijer</name><affiliations><json:string>Authors' affiliations: Kees Stellingsma, Boudewijn Stegenga, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.Jelte Bouma, Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, State University Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.Henny J. A. Meijer, Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Gerry M. Raghoebar</name><affiliations><json:string>Authors' affiliations: Kees Stellingsma, Boudewijn Stegenga, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.Jelte Bouma, Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, State University Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.Henny J. A. Meijer, Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>edentulous</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>extremely resorbed</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant‐retained overdenture</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>mandible</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>psychosocial</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>satisfaction</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>841</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-32C2BQ76-7</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: The objective of the present report was to study the effect of implant treatment on subjective parameters in edentulous patients with an extremely resorbed mandible. Three different treatment modalities to support an overdenture were compared: transmandibular implant according to Bosker, augmentation of the mandible followed by four endosseous implants, and the insertion of four short endosseous implants. Sixty patients [50 women and 10 men, mean (± SD) age 59 (± 11) years] met the inclusion criteria and were assigned in one of the three treatment groups. Before treatment and 12 months after placement of the new overdentures, denture satisfaction, psychosocial aspects and experiences during the surgical phase were assessed with a battery of questionnaires. After 1 year, 58 patients were available for evaluation: one patient had died, and one patient had moved out of the region. There was a significant improvement of patient satisfaction and psychosocial functioning in all three treatment groups. At the 1‐year evaluation, differences amongst the three groups were not significant. However, in terms of discomfort and pain during the surgical phase as well as the length of this phase (at least 6 months), the augmentation using an autologous bone graft from the iliac crest followed by inserting four endosseous implants 3 months later appeared the least favorite option of the three modalities studied.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>9.52</score><pdfWordCount>5353</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>35341</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595 x 782 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>210</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1428</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>7</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Satisfaction and psychosocial aspects of patients with an extremely resorbed mandible treated with implant‐retained overdentures</title><pmid><json:string>12656875</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>166</first><last>172</last><total>7</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2003</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>SPSS Inc., Chicago</json:string><json:string>University of Groningen</json:string><json:string>Maxillofacial Prosthetics University Hospital Groningen PO Box</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</json:string><json:string>Groningen University</json:string><json:string>Healthcare Research, State University Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry</json:string><json:string>University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands</json:string><json:string>Netherlands Tel</json:string><json:string>Netherlands Correspondence</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Kees Stellingsma</json:string><json:string>Prosthetics</json:string><json:string>J. A. Meijer</json:string><json:string>Gerry M. Raghoebar</json:string><json:string>C. Stellingsma</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Groningen</json:string><json:string>IL</json:string><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Mannheim</json:string><json:string>Chicago</json:string><json:string>Netherlands</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Bosker et al. (1991)</json:string><json:string>Chao et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Raghoebar et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Blomquist & Lindquist 1982</json:string><json:string>Boerrigter et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Kiyak et al. 1990</json:string><json:string>Bouma et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Keller 1995</json:string><json:string>Stellingsma et al</json:string><json:string>Boerrigter et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Batenburg et al. 1998b</json:string><json:string>Khamis et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>De Koomen et al. 1979</json:string><json:string>Kent 1992</json:string><json:string>Kent & Johns 1991</json:string><json:string>Cohen 1992</json:string><json:string>Batenburg et al. 1998a</json:string><json:string>Stellingsma et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Stellingsma et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Wismeijer et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Zielhuis et al. 1990</json:string><json:string>Powers et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Bosker et al. 1991</json:string><json:string>Triplett et al. 1991</json:string><json:string>Vervoorn et al. 1988</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-32C2BQ76-7</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2003</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2003</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140205.x</json:string></doi><id>38932D26BE6F42598190548D1E30C11D09690AB3</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/38932D26BE6F42598190548D1E30C11D09690AB3/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/38932D26BE6F42598190548D1E30C11D09690AB3/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/38932D26BE6F42598190548D1E30C11D09690AB3/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Satisfaction and psychosocial aspects of patients with an extremely resorbed mandible treated with implant‐retained overdentures</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-04"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Satisfaction and psychosocial aspects of patients with an extremely resorbed mandible treated with implant‐retained overdentures</title><title level="a" type="sub">A prospective, comparative study</title><title level="a" type="short">Satisfaction of patients treated with implant‐retained overdentures</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Kees</forename><surname>Stellingsma</surname></persName><affiliation>Authors' affiliations: Kees Stellingsma, Boudewijn Stegenga, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.Jelte Bouma, Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, State University Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.Henny J. A. Meijer, Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands<address><country key="NL"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Jelte</forename><surname>Bouma</surname></persName><affiliation>Authors' affiliations: Kees Stellingsma, Boudewijn Stegenga, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.Jelte Bouma, Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, State University Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.Henny J. A. Meijer, Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands<address><country key="NL"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Boudewijn</forename><surname>Stegenga</surname></persName><affiliation>Authors' affiliations: Kees Stellingsma, Boudewijn Stegenga, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.Jelte Bouma, Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, State University Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.Henny J. A. Meijer, Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands<address><country key="NL"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Henny J. A.</forename><surname>Meijer</surname></persName><affiliation>Authors' affiliations: Kees Stellingsma, Boudewijn Stegenga, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.Jelte Bouma, Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, State University Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.Henny J. A. Meijer, Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands<address><country key="NL"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Gerry M.</forename><surname>Raghoebar</surname></persName><affiliation>Authors' affiliations: Kees Stellingsma, Boudewijn Stegenga, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.Jelte Bouma, Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, State University Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.Henny J. A. Meijer, Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands<address><country key="NL"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">38932D26BE6F42598190548D1E30C11D09690AB3</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-32C2BQ76-7</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140205.x</idno><idno type="supplier">841</idno><idno type="unit">CLR140205</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR140205.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2003.14.issue-2</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="166">166</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="172">172</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-04"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold">Abstract:</hi> The objective of the present report was to study the effect of implant treatment on subjective parameters in edentulous patients with an extremely resorbed mandible. Three different treatment modalities to support an overdenture were compared: transmandibular implant according to Bosker, augmentation of the mandible followed by four endosseous implants, and the insertion of four short endosseous implants. Sixty patients [50 women and 10 men, mean (± SD) age 59 (± 11) years] met the inclusion criteria and were assigned in one of the three treatment groups. Before treatment and 12 months after placement of the new overdentures, denture satisfaction, psychosocial aspects and experiences during the surgical phase were assessed with a battery of questionnaires. After 1 year, 58 patients were available for evaluation: one patient had died, and one patient had moved out of the region. There was a significant improvement of patient satisfaction and psychosocial functioning in all three treatment groups. At the 1‐year evaluation, differences amongst the three groups were not significant. However, in terms of discomfort and pain during the surgical phase as well as the length of this phase (at least 6 months), the augmentation using an autologous bone graft from the iliac crest followed by inserting four endosseous implants 3 months later appeared the least favorite option of the three modalities studied.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">edentulous</term><term xml:id="k2">extremely resorbed</term><term xml:id="k3">implant</term><term xml:id="k4">implant‐retained overdenture</term><term xml:id="k5">mandible</term><term xml:id="k6">psychosocial</term><term xml:id="k7">satisfaction</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/38932D26BE6F42598190548D1E30C11D09690AB3/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="04002"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2003.14.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="14">14</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2003-04">April 2003</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0016600" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140205.x</doi><idGroup><id type="supplier" value="841"></id><id type="unit" value="CLR140205"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="7"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2003-03-27"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2003-03-27"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="166">166</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="172">172</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>
<i>Dr C. Stellingsma</i>
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics
University Hospital Groningen
PO Box 30.001
9700 RB Groningen
the Netherlands
Tel: 31 50 3613840
Fax: 31 50 3611136
e‐mail: c. <email>stellingsma@kchir.azg.nl</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR140205.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted 15 March 2002</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="1"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="6"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="25"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="4174"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="17"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Satisfaction and psychosocial aspects of patients with an extremely resorbed mandible treated with implant‐retained overdentures</title><title type="subtitle">A prospective, comparative study</title><title type="shortAuthors">Stellingsma et al</title><title type="short">Satisfaction of patients treated with implant‐retained overdentures</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>Kees</givenNames><familyName>Stellingsma</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>Jelte</givenNames><familyName>Bouma</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>Boudewijn</givenNames><familyName>Stegenga</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>Henny J. A.</givenNames><familyName>Meijer</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>Gerry M.</givenNames><familyName>Raghoebar</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="aff-1-1" countryCode="NL"><unparsedAffiliation><b>Authors' affiliations:</b>
Kees Stellingsma, Boudewijn Stegenga, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.Jelte Bouma, Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, State University Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.Henny J. A. Meijer, Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">edentulous</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">extremely resorbed</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">implant</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">implant‐retained overdenture</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">mandible</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">psychosocial</keyword><keyword xml:id="k7">satisfaction</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Abstract:</b> The objective of the present report was to study the effect of implant treatment on subjective parameters in edentulous patients with an extremely resorbed mandible. Three different treatment modalities to support an overdenture were compared: transmandibular implant according to Bosker, augmentation of the mandible followed by four endosseous implants, and the insertion of four short endosseous implants. Sixty patients [50 women and 10 men, mean (± SD) age 59 (± 11) years] met the inclusion criteria and were assigned in one of the three treatment groups. Before treatment and 12 months after placement of the new overdentures, denture satisfaction, psychosocial aspects and experiences during the surgical phase were assessed with a battery of questionnaires. After 1 year, 58 patients were available for evaluation: one patient had died, and one patient had moved out of the region. There was a significant improvement of patient satisfaction and psychosocial functioning in all three treatment groups. At the 1‐year evaluation, differences amongst the three groups were not significant. However, in terms of discomfort and pain during the surgical phase as well as the length of this phase (at least 6 months), the augmentation using an autologous bone graft from the iliac crest followed by inserting four endosseous implants 3 months later appeared the least favorite option of the three modalities studied.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Satisfaction and psychosocial aspects of patients with an extremely resorbed mandible treated with implant‐retained overdentures</title><subTitle>A prospective, comparative study</subTitle></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Satisfaction of patients treated with implant‐retained overdentures</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Satisfaction and psychosocial aspects of patients with an extremely resorbed mandible treated with implant‐retained overdentures</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Kees</namePart><namePart type="family">Stellingsma</namePart><affiliation>Authors' affiliations: Kees Stellingsma, Boudewijn Stegenga, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.Jelte Bouma, Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, State University Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.Henny J. A. Meijer, Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Jelte</namePart><namePart type="family">Bouma</namePart><affiliation>Authors' affiliations: Kees Stellingsma, Boudewijn Stegenga, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.Jelte Bouma, Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, State University Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.Henny J. A. Meijer, Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Boudewijn</namePart><namePart type="family">Stegenga</namePart><affiliation>Authors' affiliations: Kees Stellingsma, Boudewijn Stegenga, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.Jelte Bouma, Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, State University Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.Henny J. A. Meijer, Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Henny J. A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Meijer</namePart><affiliation>Authors' affiliations: Kees Stellingsma, Boudewijn Stegenga, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.Jelte Bouma, Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, State University Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.Henny J. A. Meijer, Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Gerry M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Raghoebar</namePart><affiliation>Authors' affiliations: Kees Stellingsma, Boudewijn Stegenga, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.Jelte Bouma, Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, State University Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.Henny J. A. Meijer, Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2003-04</dateIssued><edition>Accepted 15 March 2002</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2003</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">1</extent><extent unit="tables">6</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">25</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">4174</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Abstract: The objective of the present report was to study the effect of implant treatment on subjective parameters in edentulous patients with an extremely resorbed mandible. Three different treatment modalities to support an overdenture were compared: transmandibular implant according to Bosker, augmentation of the mandible followed by four endosseous implants, and the insertion of four short endosseous implants. Sixty patients [50 women and 10 men, mean (± SD) age 59 (± 11) years] met the inclusion criteria and were assigned in one of the three treatment groups. Before treatment and 12 months after placement of the new overdentures, denture satisfaction, psychosocial aspects and experiences during the surgical phase were assessed with a battery of questionnaires. After 1 year, 58 patients were available for evaluation: one patient had died, and one patient had moved out of the region. There was a significant improvement of patient satisfaction and psychosocial functioning in all three treatment groups. At the 1‐year evaluation, differences amongst the three groups were not significant. However, in terms of discomfort and pain during the surgical phase as well as the length of this phase (at least 6 months), the augmentation using an autologous bone graft from the iliac crest followed by inserting four endosseous implants 3 months later appeared the least favorite option of the three modalities studied.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>edentulous</topic><topic>extremely resorbed</topic><topic>implant</topic><topic>implant‐retained overdenture</topic><topic>mandible</topic><topic>psychosocial</topic><topic>satisfaction</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2003</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>14</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>166</start><end>172</end><total>7</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">38932D26BE6F42598190548D1E30C11D09690AB3</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-32C2BQ76-7</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140205.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">841</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Munksgaard International Publishers</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/38932D26BE6F42598190548D1E30C11D09690AB3/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001B68 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001B68 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:38932D26BE6F42598190548D1E30C11D09690AB3
|texte= Satisfaction and psychosocial aspects of patients with an extremely resorbed mandible treated with implant‐retained overdentures
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |