A multi‐country comparison of reasons for dental non‐attendance
Identifieur interne : 001890 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001889; suivant : 001891A multi‐country comparison of reasons for dental non‐attendance
Auteurs : Stefan Listl ; John Moeller ; Richard ManskiSource :
- European Journal of Oral Sciences [ 0909-8836 ] ; 2014-02.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to describe differences across countries with respect to the reasons for dental non‐attendance by Europeans currently 50 yr of age and older. The analyses were based on retrospective life‐history data from the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe and included information on various reasons why respondents from 13 European countries had never had regular dental visits in their lifetime. A series of logistic regression models was estimated to identify reasons for dental non‐attendance across different welfare‐state regimes. The highest proportion of respondents without any regular dental attendance throughout their lifetime was found for the Southern welfare‐state regime, followed by the Eastern, the Bismarckian, and the Scandinavian welfare‐state regimes. Factors such as patients’ perception that regular dental treatment is ‘not necessary’ or ‘not usual’ appear to be the predominant reason for non‐attendance in all welfare‐state regimes. The health system‐level factor ‘no place to receive this type of care close to home’ and the perception of regular dental treatment as ‘not necessary’ were more often referred to within the Southern, Eastern, and Bismarckian welfare‐state regimes than in Scandinavia. This could be relevant information for health‐care decision makers in order to prioritize interventions towards increasing rates of regular dental attendance.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/eos.12096
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:32D15E26DCC700734C5FD4F8A51F8934BB9E56D0Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A multi‐country comparison of reasons for dental non‐attendance</title><author><name sortKey="Listl, Stefan" sort="Listl, Stefan" uniqKey="Listl S" first="Stefan" last="Listl">Stefan Listl</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Munich Center for the Economics of Aging, Max‐Planck‐Institute for Social Law and Social Policy, Munich, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Stefan Listl, Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, GermanyE‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: stefan.listl@med.uni-heidelberg.de</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Moeller, John" sort="Moeller, John" uniqKey="Moeller J" first="John" last="Moeller">John Moeller</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Division of Health Services Research, Department of Health Promotion and Policy, Dental School, University of Maryland, MD, Baltimore, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Manski, Richard" sort="Manski, Richard" uniqKey="Manski R" first="Richard" last="Manski">Richard Manski</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Division of Health Services Research, Department of Health Promotion and Policy, Dental School, University of Maryland, MD, Baltimore, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:32D15E26DCC700734C5FD4F8A51F8934BB9E56D0</idno><date when="2014" year="2014">2014</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/eos.12096</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/32D15E26DCC700734C5FD4F8A51F8934BB9E56D0/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001890</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001890</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A multi‐country comparison of reasons for dental non‐attendance</title><author><name sortKey="Listl, Stefan" sort="Listl, Stefan" uniqKey="Listl S" first="Stefan" last="Listl">Stefan Listl</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Munich Center for the Economics of Aging, Max‐Planck‐Institute for Social Law and Social Policy, Munich, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Stefan Listl, Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, GermanyE‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: stefan.listl@med.uni-heidelberg.de</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Moeller, John" sort="Moeller, John" uniqKey="Moeller J" first="John" last="Moeller">John Moeller</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Division of Health Services Research, Department of Health Promotion and Policy, Dental School, University of Maryland, MD, Baltimore, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Manski, Richard" sort="Manski, Richard" uniqKey="Manski R" first="Richard" last="Manski">Richard Manski</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Division of Health Services Research, Department of Health Promotion and Policy, Dental School, University of Maryland, MD, Baltimore, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">European Journal of Oral Sciences</title><title level="j" type="alt">EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES</title><idno type="ISSN">0909-8836</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0722</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">122</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="62">62</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="69">69</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><date type="published" when="2014-02">2014-02</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0909-8836</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0909-8836</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">The purpose of this study was to describe differences across countries with respect to the reasons for dental non‐attendance by Europeans currently 50 yr of age and older. The analyses were based on retrospective life‐history data from the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe and included information on various reasons why respondents from 13 European countries had never had regular dental visits in their lifetime. A series of logistic regression models was estimated to identify reasons for dental non‐attendance across different welfare‐state regimes. The highest proportion of respondents without any regular dental attendance throughout their lifetime was found for the Southern welfare‐state regime, followed by the Eastern, the Bismarckian, and the Scandinavian welfare‐state regimes. Factors such as patients’ perception that regular dental treatment is ‘not necessary’ or ‘not usual’ appear to be the predominant reason for non‐attendance in all welfare‐state regimes. The health system‐level factor ‘no place to receive this type of care close to home’ and the perception of regular dental treatment as ‘not necessary’ were more often referred to within the Southern, Eastern, and Bismarckian welfare‐state regimes than in Scandinavia. This could be relevant information for health‐care decision makers in order to prioritize interventions towards increasing rates of regular dental attendance.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Stefan Listl</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany</json:string><json:string>Munich Center for the Economics of Aging, Max‐Planck‐Institute for Social Law and Social Policy, Munich, Germany</json:string><json:string>Stefan Listl, Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, GermanyE‐mail:</json:string><json:string>E-mail: stefan.listl@med.uni-heidelberg.de</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>John Moeller</name><affiliations><json:string>Division of Health Services Research, Department of Health Promotion and Policy, Dental School, University of Maryland, MD, Baltimore, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Richard Manski</name><affiliations><json:string>Division of Health Services Research, Department of Health Promotion and Policy, Dental School, University of Maryland, MD, Baltimore, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>non‐attendance</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>insurance</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>oral</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>health</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>EOS12096</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-307W82MK-R</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The purpose of this study was to describe differences across countries with respect to the reasons for dental non‐attendance by Europeans currently 50 yr of age and older. The analyses were based on retrospective life‐history data from the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe and included information on various reasons why respondents from 13 European countries had never had regular dental visits in their lifetime. A series of logistic regression models was estimated to identify reasons for dental non‐attendance across different welfare‐state regimes. The highest proportion of respondents without any regular dental attendance throughout their lifetime was found for the Southern welfare‐state regime, followed by the Eastern, the Bismarckian, and the Scandinavian welfare‐state regimes. Factors such as patients’ perception that regular dental treatment is ‘not necessary’ or ‘not usual’ appear to be the predominant reason for non‐attendance in all welfare‐state regimes. The health system‐level factor ‘no place to receive this type of care close to home’ and the perception of regular dental treatment as ‘not necessary’ were more often referred to within the Southern, Eastern, and Bismarckian welfare‐state regimes than in Scandinavia. This could be relevant information for health‐care decision makers in order to prioritize interventions towards increasing rates of regular dental attendance.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.99</score><pdfWordCount>4542</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>31889</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.7</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 799.37 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>204</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1421</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>A multi‐country comparison of reasons for dental non‐attendance</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>European Journal of Oral Sciences</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0722</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0909-8836</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0722</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>EOS</json:string></publisherId><volume>122</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>62</first><last>69</last><total>8</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Original Article</value></json:item></subject></host><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-307W82MK-R</json:string></ark><publicationDate>2014</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2014</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/eos.12096</json:string></doi><id>32D15E26DCC700734C5FD4F8A51F8934BB9E56D0</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/32D15E26DCC700734C5FD4F8A51F8934BB9E56D0/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/32D15E26DCC700734C5FD4F8A51F8934BB9E56D0/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/32D15E26DCC700734C5FD4F8A51F8934BB9E56D0/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">A multi‐country comparison of reasons for dental non‐attendance</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Wiley Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><licence>© 2013 Eur J Oral Sci</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2014-02"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A multi‐country comparison of reasons for dental non‐attendance</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Stefan</forename><surname>Listl</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Conservative Dentistry</orgName><orgName>University of Heidelberg</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Heidelberg</settlement><country>Germany</country></address></affiliation><affiliation><orgName>Munich Center for the Economics of Aging</orgName><orgName>Max‐Planck‐Institute for Social Law and Social Policy</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Munich</settlement><country key="DE">Germany</country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Stefan Listl, Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany E‐mail: stefan.listl@med.uni-heidelberg.de</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">John</forename><surname>Moeller</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Division of Health Services Research</orgName><orgName>Department of Health Promotion and Policy</orgName><orgName>Dental School</orgName><orgName>University of Maryland</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Baltimore</settlement><region>MD</region><country key="US">USA</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Richard</forename><surname>Manski</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Division of Health Services Research</orgName><orgName>Department of Health Promotion and Policy</orgName><orgName>Dental School</orgName><orgName>University of Maryland</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Baltimore</settlement><region>MD</region><country key="US">USA</country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">32D15E26DCC700734C5FD4F8A51F8934BB9E56D0</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-307W82MK-R</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/eos.12096</idno><idno type="unit">EOS12096</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:EOS.EOS12096.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">European Journal of Oral Sciences</title><title level="j" type="alt">EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES</title><idno type="pISSN">0909-8836</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0722</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0722</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/eos.2014.122.issue-1</idno><idno type="product">EOS</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">122</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="62">62</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="69">69</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><date type="published" when="2014-02"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract style="main" xml:id="eos12096-abs-0001"><p>The purpose of this study was to describe differences across countries with respect to the reasons for dental non‐attendance by <hi rend="fc">E</hi>uropeans currently 50 yr of age and older. The analyses were based on retrospective life‐history data from the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in <hi rend="fc">E</hi>urope and included information on various reasons why respondents from 13 <hi rend="fc">E</hi>uropean countries had never had regular dental visits in their lifetime. A series of logistic regression models was estimated to identify reasons for dental non‐attendance across different welfare‐state regimes. The highest proportion of respondents without any regular dental attendance throughout their lifetime was found for the Southern welfare‐state regime, followed by the <hi rend="fc">E</hi>astern, the <hi rend="fc">B</hi>ismarckian, and the <hi rend="fc">S</hi>candinavian welfare‐state regimes. Factors such as patients’ perception that regular dental treatment is ‘not necessary’ or ‘not usual’ appear to be the predominant reason for non‐attendance in all welfare‐state regimes. The health system‐level factor ‘no place to receive this type of care close to home’ and the perception of regular dental treatment as ‘not necessary’ were more often referred to within the Southern, Eastern, and <hi rend="fc">B</hi>ismarckian welfare‐state regimes than in <hi rend="fc">S</hi>candinavia. This could be relevant information for health‐care decision makers in order to prioritize interventions towards increasing rates of regular dental attendance.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords><term xml:id="eos12096-kwd-0001">dental</term><term xml:id="eos12096-kwd-0002">non‐attendance</term><term xml:id="eos12096-kwd-0003">insurance</term><term xml:id="eos12096-kwd-0004">oral</term><term xml:id="eos12096-kwd-0005">health</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Original Article</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:id="eos12096" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0722</doi><issn type="print">0909-8836</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0722</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="EOS"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title sort="EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES" type="main">European Journal of Oral Sciences</title><title type="short">Eur J Oral Sci</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="10"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/eos.2014.122.issue-1</doi><copyright ownership="thirdParty">Copyright © 2014 European Journal of Oral Sciences</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="122">122</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2014-02">February 2014</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="100" status="forIssue" type="article"><doi>10.1111/eos.12096</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="EOS12096"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count number="8" type="pageTotal"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Original Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Original articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="thirdParty">© 2013 Eur J Oral Sci</copyright><eventGroup><event date="2013-09-15" type="manuscriptAccepted"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2013-10-04" type="xmlCreated"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.2.9 mode:FullText" date="2014-01-09"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2013-10-23"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2013-10-23"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2014-01-09"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-06"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">62</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">69</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><lineatedText><line>Stefan Listl, Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany</line><line>E‐mail: <email>stefan.listl@med.uni-heidelberg.de</email></line></lineatedText></correspondenceTo><selfCitationGroup><citation type="self" xml:id="eos12096-cit-1001"><author><familyName>Listl</familyName> <givenNames>S</givenNames></author>, <author><familyName>Moeller</familyName> <givenNames>J</givenNames></author>, <author><familyName>Manski</familyName> <givenNames>R</givenNames></author>. <articleTitle>A multi‐country comparison of reasons for dental non‐attendance</articleTitle>. <journalTitle>Eur J Oral Sci</journalTitle> <pubYear year="2014">2014</pubYear>; <vol>122</vol>: <pageFirst>62</pageFirst>–<pageLast>69</pageLast>. © 2013 <journalTitle>Eur J Oral Sci</journalTitle></citation></selfCitationGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:EOS.EOS12096.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">A multi‐country comparison of reasons for dental non‐attendance</title><title type="shortAuthors"><i>Listl</i> et al.</title></titleGroup><creators><creator affiliationRef="#eos12096-aff-0001 #eos12096-aff-0002" corresponding="yes" creatorRole="author" xml:id="eos12096-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>Stefan</givenNames> <familyName>Listl</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#eos12096-aff-0003" creatorRole="author" xml:id="eos12096-cr-0002"><personName><givenNames>John</givenNames> <familyName>Moeller</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#eos12096-aff-0003" creatorRole="author" xml:id="eos12096-cr-0003"><personName><givenNames>Richard</givenNames> <familyName>Manski</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation type="organization" xml:id="eos12096-aff-0001"><orgDiv>Department of Conservative Dentistry</orgDiv> <orgName>University of Heidelberg</orgName> <address><city>Heidelberg</city><country>Germany</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="DE" type="organization" xml:id="eos12096-aff-0002"><orgDiv>Munich Center for the Economics of Aging</orgDiv> <orgName>Max‐Planck‐Institute for Social Law and Social Policy</orgName> <address><city>Munich</city> <country>Germany</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="US" type="organization" xml:id="eos12096-aff-0003"><orgDiv>Division of Health Services Research</orgDiv> <orgDiv>Department of Health Promotion and Policy</orgDiv> <orgDiv>Dental School</orgDiv> <orgName>University of Maryland</orgName> <address><city>Baltimore</city> <countryPart>MD</countryPart> <country>USA</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="eos12096-kwd-0001">dental</keyword><keyword xml:id="eos12096-kwd-0002">non‐attendance</keyword><keyword xml:id="eos12096-kwd-0003">insurance</keyword><keyword xml:id="eos12096-kwd-0004">oral</keyword><keyword xml:id="eos12096-kwd-0005">health</keyword></keywordGroup><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research of the US National Institutes of Health</fundingAgency><fundingNumber>3R01DE021678‐06S1</fundingNumber></fundingInfo><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>European Commission through the 5th framework programme</fundingAgency><fundingNumber>SHARE‐I3</fundingNumber><fundingNumber>RII‐CT‐2006‐062193</fundingNumber><fundingNumber>CIT5‐CT‐2005‐028857</fundingNumber><fundingNumber>CIT4‐CT‐2006‐028812</fundingNumber><fundingNumber>211909</fundingNumber><fundingNumber>227822</fundingNumber><fundingNumber>QLK6‐CT‐2001‐00360</fundingNumber></fundingInfo><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>US National Institute on Aging</fundingAgency><fundingNumber>SHARE‐I3</fundingNumber><fundingNumber>RII‐CT‐2006‐062193</fundingNumber><fundingNumber>CIT5‐CT‐2005‐028857</fundingNumber><fundingNumber>CIT4‐CT‐2006‐028812</fundingNumber><fundingNumber>211909</fundingNumber><fundingNumber>227822</fundingNumber></fundingInfo><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>SHARE‐I3</fundingAgency><fundingNumber>RII‐CT‐2006‐062193</fundingNumber></fundingInfo><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>COMPARE</fundingAgency><fundingNumber>CIT5‐CT‐2005‐028857</fundingNumber></fundingInfo><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>SHARELIFE</fundingAgency><fundingNumber>CIT4‐CT‐2006‐028812</fundingNumber></fundingInfo><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>SHARE‐PREP</fundingAgency><fundingNumber>211909</fundingNumber></fundingInfo><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>SHARE‐LEAP</fundingAgency><fundingNumber>R21 AG025169</fundingNumber><fundingNumber>227822</fundingNumber><fundingNumber>U01 AG09740‐13S2</fundingNumber><fundingNumber>P01 AG005842</fundingNumber><fundingNumber>P01 AG08291</fundingNumber><fundingNumber>P30 AG12815</fundingNumber><fundingNumber>Y1‐AG‐4553‐01</fundingNumber><fundingNumber>OGHA 04‐064</fundingNumber><fundingNumber>IAG BSR06‐11</fundingNumber></fundingInfo><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:id="eos12096-abs-0001"><p>The purpose of this study was to describe differences across countries with respect to the reasons for dental non‐attendance by <fc>E</fc>uropeans currently 50 yr of age and older. The analyses were based on retrospective life‐history data from the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in <fc>E</fc>urope and included information on various reasons why respondents from 13 <fc>E</fc>uropean countries had never had regular dental visits in their lifetime. A series of logistic regression models was estimated to identify reasons for dental non‐attendance across different welfare‐state regimes. The highest proportion of respondents without any regular dental attendance throughout their lifetime was found for the Southern welfare‐state regime, followed by the <fc>E</fc>astern, the <fc>B</fc>ismarckian, and the <fc>S</fc>candinavian welfare‐state regimes. Factors such as patients’ perception that regular dental treatment is ‘not necessary’ or ‘not usual’ appear to be the predominant reason for non‐attendance in all welfare‐state regimes. The health system‐level factor ‘no place to receive this type of care close to home’ and the perception of regular dental treatment as ‘not necessary’ were more often referred to within the Southern, Eastern, and <fc>B</fc>ismarckian welfare‐state regimes than in <fc>S</fc>candinavia. This could be relevant information for health‐care decision makers in order to prioritize interventions towards increasing rates of regular dental attendance.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>A multi‐country comparison of reasons for dental non‐attendance</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>A multi‐country comparison of reasons for dental non‐attendance</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Stefan</namePart><namePart type="family">Listl</namePart><affiliation>Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany</affiliation><affiliation>Munich Center for the Economics of Aging, Max‐Planck‐Institute for Social Law and Social Policy, Munich, Germany</affiliation><affiliation>Stefan Listl, Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, GermanyE‐mail:</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: stefan.listl@med.uni-heidelberg.de</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">John</namePart><namePart type="family">Moeller</namePart><affiliation>Division of Health Services Research, Department of Health Promotion and Policy, Dental School, University of Maryland, MD, Baltimore, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Richard</namePart><namePart type="family">Manski</namePart><affiliation>Division of Health Services Research, Department of Health Promotion and Policy, Dental School, University of Maryland, MD, Baltimore, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2014-02</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2013-10-04</dateCreated><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2013-09-15</dateValid><edition>Listl S, Moeller J, Manski R. A multi‐country comparison of reasons for dental non‐attendance. Eur J Oral Sci 2014; 122: 62–69. © 2013 Eur J Oral Sci</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2014</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract>The purpose of this study was to describe differences across countries with respect to the reasons for dental non‐attendance by Europeans currently 50 yr of age and older. The analyses were based on retrospective life‐history data from the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe and included information on various reasons why respondents from 13 European countries had never had regular dental visits in their lifetime. A series of logistic regression models was estimated to identify reasons for dental non‐attendance across different welfare‐state regimes. The highest proportion of respondents without any regular dental attendance throughout their lifetime was found for the Southern welfare‐state regime, followed by the Eastern, the Bismarckian, and the Scandinavian welfare‐state regimes. Factors such as patients’ perception that regular dental treatment is ‘not necessary’ or ‘not usual’ appear to be the predominant reason for non‐attendance in all welfare‐state regimes. The health system‐level factor ‘no place to receive this type of care close to home’ and the perception of regular dental treatment as ‘not necessary’ were more often referred to within the Southern, Eastern, and Bismarckian welfare‐state regimes than in Scandinavia. This could be relevant information for health‐care decision makers in order to prioritize interventions towards increasing rates of regular dental attendance.</abstract><note type="funding">National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research of the US National Institutes of Health - No. 3R01DE021678‐06S1; </note><note type="funding">European Commission through the 5th framework programme - No. SHARE‐I3; No. RII‐CT‐2006‐062193; No. CIT5‐CT‐2005‐028857; No. CIT4‐CT‐2006‐028812; No. 211909; No. 227822; No. QLK6‐CT‐2001‐00360; </note><note type="funding">US National Institute on Aging - No. SHARE‐I3; No. RII‐CT‐2006‐062193; No. CIT5‐CT‐2005‐028857; No. CIT4‐CT‐2006‐028812; No. 211909; No. 227822; </note><note type="funding">SHARE‐I3 - No. RII‐CT‐2006‐062193; </note><note type="funding">COMPARE - No. CIT5‐CT‐2005‐028857; </note><note type="funding">SHARELIFE - No. CIT4‐CT‐2006‐028812; </note><note type="funding">SHARE‐PREP - No. 211909; </note><note type="funding">SHARE‐LEAP - No. R21 AG025169; No. 227822; No. U01 AG09740‐13S2; No. P01 AG005842; No. P01 AG08291; No. P30 AG12815; No. Y1‐AG‐4553‐01; No. OGHA 04‐064; No. IAG BSR06‐11; </note><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>dental</topic><topic>non‐attendance</topic><topic>insurance</topic><topic>oral</topic><topic>health</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>European Journal of Oral Sciences</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Eur J Oral Sci</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Original Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0909-8836</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0722</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0722</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">EOS</identifier><part><date>2014</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>122</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>62</start><end>69</end><total>8</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">32D15E26DCC700734C5FD4F8A51F8934BB9E56D0</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-307W82MK-R</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/eos.12096</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">EOS12096</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2014 European Journal of Oral Sciences© 2013 Eur J Oral Sci</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/32D15E26DCC700734C5FD4F8A51F8934BB9E56D0/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001890 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001890 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:32D15E26DCC700734C5FD4F8A51F8934BB9E56D0
|texte= A multi‐country comparison of reasons for dental non‐attendance
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |