Comparison between Conventional and Piezoelectric Surgical Tools for Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Identifieur interne : 001582 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001581; suivant : 001583Comparison between Conventional and Piezoelectric Surgical Tools for Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Auteurs : Daniela Rickert ; Arjan Vissink ; James J. R. Huddleston Slater ; Henny J. A. Meijer ; Gerry M. RaghoebarSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2013-04.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Alveolar bone, Alveolar crest, Augmentation, Bone healing, Bone resorption, Center groningen, Clin, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical trial, Control group, Conventional rotative, Conventional rotative instruments, Elevation, Elevation surgery, Functional loading, Graft, Groningen, Healing period, Implant, Implant placement, Lateral wall, Maxillary, Maxillary bone, Maxillary sinus, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial surgery, Membrane, Operation time, Oral maxillofac surg, Perforation, Piezoelectric, Piezoelectric bone surgery, Piezoelectric device, Piezoelectric surgery, Piezosurgery, Primary stability, Resorbable, Resorbable membrane, Resorption, Rotative, Rotative instruments, Schneiderian membrane, Sinus, Sinus membrane, Surgery, Test group.
- Teeft :
- Alveolar bone, Alveolar crest, Augmentation, Bone healing, Bone resorption, Center groningen, Clin, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical trial, Control group, Conventional rotative, Conventional rotative instruments, Elevation, Elevation surgery, Functional loading, Graft, Groningen, Healing period, Implant, Implant placement, Lateral wall, Maxillary, Maxillary bone, Maxillary sinus, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial surgery, Membrane, Operation time, Oral maxillofac surg, Perforation, Piezoelectric, Piezoelectric bone surgery, Piezoelectric device, Piezoelectric surgery, Piezosurgery, Primary stability, Resorbable, Resorbable membrane, Resorption, Rotative, Rotative instruments, Schneiderian membrane, Sinus, Sinus membrane, Surgery, Test group.
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of conventional rotative instruments and a piezoelectric device for maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery, and to assess whether application of a resorbable membrane reduces resorption of an augmented site in a randomized clinical trial.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00364.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:2CD1CAAA6341CC3381C718E67D6144BEBF93B5EFLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparison between Conventional and Piezoelectric Surgical Tools for Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial</title><author><name sortKey="Rickert, Daniela" sort="Rickert, Daniela" uniqKey="Rickert D" first="Daniela" last="Rickert">Daniela Rickert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dentist, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vissink, Arjan" sort="Vissink, Arjan" uniqKey="Vissink A" first="Arjan" last="Vissink">Arjan Vissink</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>oral and maxillofacial surgeon, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: a.vissink@kchir.umcg.nl</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Slater, James J R Huddleston" sort="Slater, James J R Huddleston" uniqKey="Slater J" first="James J. R. Huddleston" last="Slater">James J. R. Huddleston Slater</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>dentist, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Department of Prosthodontics, Academic Center for Oral Health, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands,</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Meijer, Henny J A" sort="Meijer, Henny J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="Henny J. A." last="Meijer">Henny J. A. Meijer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>dentist, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Department of Prosthodontics, Academic Center for Oral Health, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, Gerry M" sort="Raghoebar, Gerry M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="Gerry M." last="Raghoebar">Gerry M. Raghoebar</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>oral and maxillofacial surgeon, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:2CD1CAAA6341CC3381C718E67D6144BEBF93B5EF</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00364.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/2CD1CAAA6341CC3381C718E67D6144BEBF93B5EF/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001582</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001582</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Comparison between Conventional and Piezoelectric Surgical Tools for Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial</title><author><name sortKey="Rickert, Daniela" sort="Rickert, Daniela" uniqKey="Rickert D" first="Daniela" last="Rickert">Daniela Rickert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dentist, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vissink, Arjan" sort="Vissink, Arjan" uniqKey="Vissink A" first="Arjan" last="Vissink">Arjan Vissink</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>oral and maxillofacial surgeon, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: a.vissink@kchir.umcg.nl</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Slater, James J R Huddleston" sort="Slater, James J R Huddleston" uniqKey="Slater J" first="James J. R. Huddleston" last="Slater">James J. R. Huddleston Slater</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>dentist, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Department of Prosthodontics, Academic Center for Oral Health, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands,</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Meijer, Henny J A" sort="Meijer, Henny J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="Henny J. A." last="Meijer">Henny J. A. Meijer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>dentist, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Department of Prosthodontics, Academic Center for Oral Health, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, Gerry M" sort="Raghoebar, Gerry M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="Gerry M." last="Raghoebar">Gerry M. Raghoebar</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>oral and maxillofacial surgeon, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">15</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="297">297</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="302">302</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2013-04">2013-04</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar bone</term><term>Alveolar crest</term><term>Augmentation</term><term>Bone healing</term><term>Bone resorption</term><term>Center groningen</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Control group</term><term>Conventional rotative</term><term>Conventional rotative instruments</term><term>Elevation</term><term>Elevation surgery</term><term>Functional loading</term><term>Graft</term><term>Groningen</term><term>Healing period</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Lateral wall</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary bone</term><term>Maxillary sinus</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Membrane</term><term>Operation time</term><term>Oral maxillofac surg</term><term>Perforation</term><term>Piezoelectric</term><term>Piezoelectric bone surgery</term><term>Piezoelectric device</term><term>Piezoelectric surgery</term><term>Piezosurgery</term><term>Primary stability</term><term>Resorbable</term><term>Resorbable membrane</term><term>Resorption</term><term>Rotative</term><term>Rotative instruments</term><term>Schneiderian membrane</term><term>Sinus</term><term>Sinus membrane</term><term>Surgery</term><term>Test group</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar bone</term><term>Alveolar crest</term><term>Augmentation</term><term>Bone healing</term><term>Bone resorption</term><term>Center groningen</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Control group</term><term>Conventional rotative</term><term>Conventional rotative instruments</term><term>Elevation</term><term>Elevation surgery</term><term>Functional loading</term><term>Graft</term><term>Groningen</term><term>Healing period</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Lateral wall</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary bone</term><term>Maxillary sinus</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Membrane</term><term>Operation time</term><term>Oral maxillofac surg</term><term>Perforation</term><term>Piezoelectric</term><term>Piezoelectric bone surgery</term><term>Piezoelectric device</term><term>Piezoelectric surgery</term><term>Piezosurgery</term><term>Primary stability</term><term>Resorbable</term><term>Resorbable membrane</term><term>Resorption</term><term>Rotative</term><term>Rotative instruments</term><term>Schneiderian membrane</term><term>Sinus</term><term>Sinus membrane</term><term>Surgery</term><term>Test group</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of conventional rotative instruments and a piezoelectric device for maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery, and to assess whether application of a resorbable membrane reduces resorption of an augmented site in a randomized clinical trial.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>maxillary</json:string><json:string>sinus</json:string><json:string>rotative</json:string><json:string>piezosurgery</json:string><json:string>perforation</json:string><json:string>maxillary sinus</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>conventional rotative instruments</json:string><json:string>groningen</json:string><json:string>piezoelectric device</json:string><json:string>resorption</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>resorbable</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial surgery</json:string><json:string>augmentation</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>center groningen</json:string><json:string>operation time</json:string><json:string>graft</json:string><json:string>piezoelectric surgery</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac surg</json:string><json:string>alveolar crest</json:string><json:string>resorbable membrane</json:string><json:string>elevation</json:string><json:string>sinus membrane</json:string><json:string>rotative instruments</json:string><json:string>maxillary bone</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>elevation surgery</json:string><json:string>bone healing</json:string><json:string>schneiderian membrane</json:string><json:string>piezoelectric</json:string><json:string>membrane</json:string><json:string>surgery</json:string><json:string>control group</json:string><json:string>alveolar bone</json:string><json:string>bone resorption</json:string><json:string>healing period</json:string><json:string>test group</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>conventional rotative</json:string><json:string>lateral wall</json:string><json:string>piezoelectric bone surgery</json:string><json:string>functional loading</json:string><json:string>clinical trial</json:string><json:string>primary stability</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Daniela Rickert DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Dentist, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Arjan Vissink DMD, MD, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>oral and maxillofacial surgeon, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands;</json:string><json:string>E-mail: a.vissink@kchir.umcg.nl</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>James J.R. Huddleston Slater DDS, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>dentist, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Department of Prosthodontics, Academic Center for Oral Health, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands,</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Henny J.A. Meijer DDS, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>dentist, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Department of Prosthodontics, Academic Center for Oral Health, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Gerry M. Raghoebar DMD, MD, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>oral and maxillofacial surgeon, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands;</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>conventional rotative instruments</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>maxillary sinus floor elevation</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>piezosurgery</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID364</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-PXQ6N479-G</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of conventional rotative instruments and a piezoelectric device for maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery, and to assess whether application of a resorbable membrane reduces resorption of an augmented site in a randomized clinical trial.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>5.67</score><pdfWordCount>3130</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>20206</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>6</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>585 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>45</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>296</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>3</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Comparison between Conventional and Piezoelectric Surgical Tools for Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial</title><pmid><json:string>21745325</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>297</first><last>302</last><total>6</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>ARTICLE</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2013</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</json:string><json:string>Academic Center for Oral Health</json:string><json:string>University of Groningen</json:string><json:string>University Medical Center Groningen</json:string><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Martin Medizin</json:string><json:string>J.A. Meijer</json:string><json:string>P.O. Box</json:string><json:string>Barone</json:string><json:string>Informed</json:string><json:string>Wallace</json:string><json:string>Gielkens</json:string><json:string>Raghoebar</json:string><json:string>Arjan Vissink</json:string><json:string>Gerry M. Raghoebar</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Groningen</json:string><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Genoa</json:string><json:string>Italy</json:string><json:string>Netherlands</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-PXQ6N479-G</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2013</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2013</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00364.x</json:string></doi><id>2CD1CAAA6341CC3381C718E67D6144BEBF93B5EF</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/2CD1CAAA6341CC3381C718E67D6144BEBF93B5EF/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/2CD1CAAA6341CC3381C718E67D6144BEBF93B5EF/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/2CD1CAAA6341CC3381C718E67D6144BEBF93B5EF/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Comparison between Conventional and Piezoelectric Surgical Tools for Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2013-04"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Comparison between Conventional and Piezoelectric Surgical Tools for Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial</title><title level="a" type="short">Piezosurgery for Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation Surgery</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Daniela</forename><surname>Rickert</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Dentist, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands;<address><country key="NL"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Arjan</forename><surname>Vissink</surname><roleName type="degree">DMD, MD, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>oral and maxillofacial surgeon, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands;<address><country key="NL"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Prof. Arjan Vissink, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands; e‐mail: a.vissink@kchir.umcg.nl</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">James J.R. Huddleston</forename><surname>Slater</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>dentist, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Department of Prosthodontics, Academic Center for Oral Health, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands,<address><country key="NL"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Henny J.A.</forename><surname>Meijer</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>dentist, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Department of Prosthodontics, Academic Center for Oral Health, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands<address><country key="NL"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Gerry M.</forename><surname>Raghoebar</surname><roleName type="degree">DMD, MD, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>oral and maxillofacial surgeon, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands;<address><country key="NL"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">2CD1CAAA6341CC3381C718E67D6144BEBF93B5EF</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-PXQ6N479-G</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00364.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID364</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID364.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2013.15.issue-2</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">15</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="297">297</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="302">302</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2013-04"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p><hi rend="bold">Aim:</hi> The aim of this study was to assess the performance of conventional rotative instruments and a piezoelectric device for maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery, and to assess whether application of a resorbable membrane reduces resorption of an augmented site in a randomized clinical trial.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and Methods:</hi> Thirty‐six consecutive patients (59.2 ± 10.7 years, range 38–76 years) needing bilateral sinus floor elevation surgery agreed to participate in this study. In a parallel split mouth design randomized clinical trial, in which the allocation of the surgical technique to be used on the determined sites was randomly assigned, one site was always treated with conventional rotative instruments (control group) and the other site with piezosurgery (test group). In addition, in a random order, the grafted sites were covered with a collagen membrane or no membrane. After a healing period of 3–4 months implants were placed.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results:</hi> Comparison of clinical features of the test and control sites revealed no differences with regard to wound healing and complications (perforations of the sinus membrane) during or postsurgery (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> = .458, <hi rend="italic">p</hi> = 1.0, respectively). A clinically insignificant, but statistically shorter operation time was observed when using conventional rotative instruments (11.1 ± 2.4 minutes) than using piezosurgery (15.1 ± 2.9 minutes; <hi rend="italic">p</hi> < .001). In both groups, application of a resorbable membrane did not result in less horizontal bone resorption (membrane: 1.43 mm, no membrane: 1.06 mm; <hi rend="italic">p</hi> = .062); All 193 implants could be placed with primary stability. One year after functional loading, survival rate was 100%.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion:</hi> It can be concluded that, for maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery, a piezoelectric device shows no advantages over rotative instruments as well as that placement of a barrier membrane did not reduce resorption of the augmented site.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">conventional rotative instruments</term><term xml:id="k2">maxillary sinus floor elevation</term><term xml:id="k3">piezosurgery</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>ARTICLES</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>ARTICLE</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/2CD1CAAA6341CC3381C718E67D6144BEBF93B5EF/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="04102"><doi>10.1111/cid.2013.15.issue-2</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering number="15" type="journalVolume">15</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2013-04">April 2013</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="170" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00364.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID364"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="6"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title><title type="articleCategory">ARTICLE</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.2.0 mode:FullText" date="2013-03-25"></event><event date="2013-03-26" type="xmlCorrected"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2011-07-11"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-07-11"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2013-04-02"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-01"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">297</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">302</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Prof. Arjan Vissink, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands; e‐mail: <email>a.vissink@kchir.umcg.nl</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID364.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="19"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="2963"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Comparison between Conventional and Piezoelectric Surgical Tools for Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial</title><title type="shortAuthors">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Volume *, Number *, 2011</title><title type="short">Piezosurgery for Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation Surgery</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Daniela</givenNames><familyName>Rickert</familyName><degrees>DDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Arjan</givenNames><familyName>Vissink</familyName><degrees>DMD, MD, PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>James J.R. Huddleston</givenNames><familyName>Slater</familyName><degrees>DDS, PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a4"><personName><givenNames>Henny J.A.</givenNames><familyName>Meijer</familyName><degrees>DDS, PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Gerry M.</givenNames><familyName>Raghoebar</familyName><degrees>DMD, MD, PhD</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="NL"><unparsedAffiliation>Dentist, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="NL"><unparsedAffiliation>oral and maxillofacial surgeon, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="NL"><unparsedAffiliation>dentist, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Department of Prosthodontics, Academic Center for Oral Health, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands,</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="NL"><unparsedAffiliation>dentist, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Department of Prosthodontics, Academic Center for Oral Health, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">conventional rotative instruments</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">maxillary sinus floor elevation</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">piezosurgery</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p><b>Aim:</b> The aim of this study was to assess the performance of conventional rotative instruments and a piezoelectric device for maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery, and to assess whether application of a resorbable membrane reduces resorption of an augmented site in a randomized clinical trial.</p><p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> Thirty‐six consecutive patients (59.2 ± 10.7 years, range 38–76 years) needing bilateral sinus floor elevation surgery agreed to participate in this study. In a parallel split mouth design randomized clinical trial, in which the allocation of the surgical technique to be used on the determined sites was randomly assigned, one site was always treated with conventional rotative instruments (control group) and the other site with piezosurgery (test group). In addition, in a random order, the grafted sites were covered with a collagen membrane or no membrane. After a healing period of 3–4 months implants were placed.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Comparison of clinical features of the test and control sites revealed no differences with regard to wound healing and complications (perforations of the sinus membrane) during or postsurgery (<i>p</i> = .458, <i>p</i> = 1.0, respectively). A clinically insignificant, but statistically shorter operation time was observed when using conventional rotative instruments (11.1 ± 2.4 minutes) than using piezosurgery (15.1 ± 2.9 minutes; <i>p</i> < .001). In both groups, application of a resorbable membrane did not result in less horizontal bone resorption (membrane: 1.43 mm, no membrane: 1.06 mm; <i>p</i> = .062); All 193 implants could be placed with primary stability. One year after functional loading, survival rate was 100%.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> It can be concluded that, for maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery, a piezoelectric device shows no advantages over rotative instruments as well as that placement of a barrier membrane did not reduce resorption of the augmented site.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note xml:id="fn1"><p>Conflict of interest and sources of funding statement</p></note><note xml:id="fn2"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestin this study. No external funding was obtained.</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Comparison between Conventional and Piezoelectric Surgical Tools for Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Piezosurgery for Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation Surgery</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Comparison between Conventional and Piezoelectric Surgical Tools for Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Daniela</namePart><namePart type="family">Rickert</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>Dentist, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Arjan</namePart><namePart type="family">Vissink</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DMD, MD, PhD</namePart><affiliation>oral and maxillofacial surgeon, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands;</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: a.vissink@kchir.umcg.nl</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">James J.R. Huddleston</namePart><namePart type="family">Slater</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart><affiliation>dentist, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Department of Prosthodontics, Academic Center for Oral Health, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands,</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Henny J.A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Meijer</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart><affiliation>dentist, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Department of Prosthodontics, Academic Center for Oral Health, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Gerry M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Raghoebar</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DMD, MD, PhD</namePart><affiliation>oral and maxillofacial surgeon, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2013-04</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2013</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">0</extent><extent unit="tables">0</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">19</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">2963</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of conventional rotative instruments and a piezoelectric device for maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery, and to assess whether application of a resorbable membrane reduces resorption of an augmented site in a randomized clinical trial.</abstract><abstract>Materials and Methods: Thirty‐six consecutive patients (59.2 ± 10.7 years, range 38–76 years) needing bilateral sinus floor elevation surgery agreed to participate in this study. In a parallel split mouth design randomized clinical trial, in which the allocation of the surgical technique to be used on the determined sites was randomly assigned, one site was always treated with conventional rotative instruments (control group) and the other site with piezosurgery (test group). In addition, in a random order, the grafted sites were covered with a collagen membrane or no membrane. After a healing period of 3–4 months implants were placed.</abstract><abstract>Results: Comparison of clinical features of the test and control sites revealed no differences with regard to wound healing and complications (perforations of the sinus membrane) during or postsurgery (p = .458, p = 1.0, respectively). A clinically insignificant, but statistically shorter operation time was observed when using conventional rotative instruments (11.1 ± 2.4 minutes) than using piezosurgery (15.1 ± 2.9 minutes; p < .001). In both groups, application of a resorbable membrane did not result in less horizontal bone resorption (membrane: 1.43 mm, no membrane: 1.06 mm; p = .062); All 193 implants could be placed with primary stability. One year after functional loading, survival rate was 100%.</abstract><abstract>Conclusion: It can be concluded that, for maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery, a piezoelectric device shows no advantages over rotative instruments as well as that placement of a barrier membrane did not reduce resorption of the augmented site.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>conventional rotative instruments</topic><topic>maxillary sinus floor elevation</topic><topic>piezosurgery</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>ARTICLE</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2013</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>15</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>297</start><end>302</end><total>6</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">2CD1CAAA6341CC3381C718E67D6144BEBF93B5EF</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-PXQ6N479-G</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00364.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID364</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/2CD1CAAA6341CC3381C718E67D6144BEBF93B5EF/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001582 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001582 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:2CD1CAAA6341CC3381C718E67D6144BEBF93B5EF
|texte= Comparison between Conventional and Piezoelectric Surgical Tools for Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |