What do measures of ‘oral health‐related quality of life’ measure?
Identifieur interne : 001423 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001422; suivant : 001424What do measures of ‘oral health‐related quality of life’ measure?
Auteurs : David Locker ; Finbarr AllenSource :
- Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology [ 0301-5661 ] ; 2007-12.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Chapel hill, Child patients, Clinical practice, Clinical trials, Community dent, Community dent health, Constituent domains, Content validity, Criterion validity, Critical appraisal, Current measures, Daily life, Daily performances, Dent, Dental disease, Dental ecology, Dental hygiene, Dental impact, Dental patients, Dental treatment, Disability paradox, Ecology, Everyday life, Feinstein, Functional status, Further development, Gill, Global ratings, Gohai, Gohai scores, Group level, Guyatt, Health assessment index, Health care, Health indicators, Health professionals, Health quality, Health status, Health status indicators, Healthrelated quality, Icidh model, Impact item, Importance ratings, Individual patients, Individualized measures, Item impact study, Item pool, Journal compilation, Life instrument, Life inventory, Life measure, Life measures, Life questionnaire, Life questionnaires, Life satisfaction, Life test, Locker allen, Many measures, Measure quality, Methodological issues, Ohip, Oidp, Oral, Oral cavity, Oral conditions, Oral diseases, Oral disorders, Oral health, Oral health assessment index, Oral health impact, Oral health quality, Oral health research, Oral health status, Oral impacts, Oral quality, Other predictors, Other sources, Outcome measures, Overall quality, Psychosocial, Psychosocial impacts, Psychosocial outcomes, Qualitative component, Qualitative interviews, Qualitative studies, Relative importance, Satisfaction questions, Slade, Social impact, Social impacts, Sroh items, Subjective health status measures, Such measures, Supplemental items, Target population, Terms quality, Various kinds, Wide range.
- Teeft :
- Chapel hill, Child patients, Clinical practice, Clinical trials, Community dent, Community dent health, Constituent domains, Content validity, Criterion validity, Critical appraisal, Current measures, Daily life, Daily performances, Dent, Dental disease, Dental ecology, Dental hygiene, Dental impact, Dental patients, Dental treatment, Disability paradox, Ecology, Everyday life, Feinstein, Functional status, Further development, Gill, Global ratings, Gohai, Gohai scores, Group level, Guyatt, Health assessment index, Health care, Health indicators, Health professionals, Health quality, Health status, Health status indicators, Healthrelated quality, Icidh model, Impact item, Importance ratings, Individual patients, Individualized measures, Item impact study, Item pool, Journal compilation, Life instrument, Life inventory, Life measure, Life measures, Life questionnaire, Life questionnaires, Life satisfaction, Life test, Locker allen, Many measures, Measure quality, Methodological issues, Ohip, Oidp, Oral, Oral cavity, Oral conditions, Oral diseases, Oral disorders, Oral health, Oral health assessment index, Oral health impact, Oral health quality, Oral health research, Oral health status, Oral impacts, Oral quality, Other predictors, Other sources, Outcome measures, Overall quality, Psychosocial, Psychosocial impacts, Psychosocial outcomes, Qualitative component, Qualitative interviews, Qualitative studies, Relative importance, Satisfaction questions, Slade, Social impact, Social impacts, Sroh items, Subjective health status measures, Such measures, Supplemental items, Target population, Terms quality, Various kinds, Wide range.
Abstract
The terms ‘health‐related quality of life’ and ‘quality of life’ are now in common use to describe the outcomes of oral health conditions and therapy for those conditions. In addition, there has been a proliferation of measures designed to quantify those outcomes. These measures, which were initially designated as socio‐dental indicators or subjective oral health indicators are now more usually referred to as measures of oral health‐related quality of life (OH‐QoL). This is based on the assumption that the functional and psychosocial impacts they document must, of necessity, affect the quality of life. While this assumption has been subject to critical scrutiny in medicine, this is not the case with dentistry. Consequently, exactly what is being measured by indexes of OH‐QoL is somewhat unclear. Based on the debate between Gill and Feinstein and Guyatt and Cook, we outline a number of criteria by means of which the construct addressed by measures of OH‐QoL may be assessed. These are concerned with how the measures were developed and validated. These criteria are then used to appraise five of the many measures that have been developed over the past 20 years – the GOHAI, OHIP, OIDP, COHQoL and OH‐QoL. The main conclusion is that while all document the frequency of the functional and psychosocial impacts that emanate from oral disorders they do not unequivocally establish the meaning and significance of those impacts. Consequently, the claim that oral disorders affect the quality of life has yet to be clearly demonstrated. Verifying this claim requires further qualitative studies of the outcomes of oral disorders as perceived by patients and persons, and the concurrent use of measures that more explicitly address the issue of quality of life.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00418.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:298E29CBD94E17B067B1F003506CFC24FBF6BFF1Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">What do measures of ‘oral health‐related quality of life’ measure?</title><author><name sortKey="Locker, David" sort="Locker, David" uniqKey="Locker D" first="David" last="Locker">David Locker</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Community Dental Health Services Research Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Allen, Finbarr" sort="Allen, Finbarr" uniqKey="Allen F" first="Finbarr" last="Allen">Finbarr Allen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, University Dental School and Hospital, Cork, Ireland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:298E29CBD94E17B067B1F003506CFC24FBF6BFF1</idno><date when="2007" year="2007">2007</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00418.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/298E29CBD94E17B067B1F003506CFC24FBF6BFF1/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001423</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001423</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">What do measures of ‘oral health‐related quality of life’ measure?</title><author><name sortKey="Locker, David" sort="Locker, David" uniqKey="Locker D" first="David" last="Locker">David Locker</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Community Dental Health Services Research Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Allen, Finbarr" sort="Allen, Finbarr" uniqKey="Allen F" first="Finbarr" last="Allen">Finbarr Allen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, University Dental School and Hospital, Cork, Ireland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology</title><title level="j" type="alt">COMMUNITY DENTISTRY ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY</title><idno type="ISSN">0301-5661</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0528</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">35</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="401">401</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="411">411</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">11</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-12">2007-12</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0301-5661</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0301-5661</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Chapel hill</term><term>Child patients</term><term>Clinical practice</term><term>Clinical trials</term><term>Community dent</term><term>Community dent health</term><term>Constituent domains</term><term>Content validity</term><term>Criterion validity</term><term>Critical appraisal</term><term>Current measures</term><term>Daily life</term><term>Daily performances</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental disease</term><term>Dental ecology</term><term>Dental hygiene</term><term>Dental impact</term><term>Dental patients</term><term>Dental treatment</term><term>Disability paradox</term><term>Ecology</term><term>Everyday life</term><term>Feinstein</term><term>Functional status</term><term>Further development</term><term>Gill</term><term>Global ratings</term><term>Gohai</term><term>Gohai scores</term><term>Group level</term><term>Guyatt</term><term>Health assessment index</term><term>Health care</term><term>Health indicators</term><term>Health professionals</term><term>Health quality</term><term>Health status</term><term>Health status indicators</term><term>Healthrelated quality</term><term>Icidh model</term><term>Impact item</term><term>Importance ratings</term><term>Individual patients</term><term>Individualized measures</term><term>Item impact study</term><term>Item pool</term><term>Journal compilation</term><term>Life instrument</term><term>Life inventory</term><term>Life measure</term><term>Life measures</term><term>Life questionnaire</term><term>Life questionnaires</term><term>Life satisfaction</term><term>Life test</term><term>Locker allen</term><term>Many measures</term><term>Measure quality</term><term>Methodological issues</term><term>Ohip</term><term>Oidp</term><term>Oral</term><term>Oral cavity</term><term>Oral conditions</term><term>Oral diseases</term><term>Oral disorders</term><term>Oral health</term><term>Oral health assessment index</term><term>Oral health impact</term><term>Oral health quality</term><term>Oral health research</term><term>Oral health status</term><term>Oral impacts</term><term>Oral quality</term><term>Other predictors</term><term>Other sources</term><term>Outcome measures</term><term>Overall quality</term><term>Psychosocial</term><term>Psychosocial impacts</term><term>Psychosocial outcomes</term><term>Qualitative component</term><term>Qualitative interviews</term><term>Qualitative studies</term><term>Relative importance</term><term>Satisfaction questions</term><term>Slade</term><term>Social impact</term><term>Social impacts</term><term>Sroh items</term><term>Subjective health status measures</term><term>Such measures</term><term>Supplemental items</term><term>Target population</term><term>Terms quality</term><term>Various kinds</term><term>Wide range</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Chapel hill</term><term>Child patients</term><term>Clinical practice</term><term>Clinical trials</term><term>Community dent</term><term>Community dent health</term><term>Constituent domains</term><term>Content validity</term><term>Criterion validity</term><term>Critical appraisal</term><term>Current measures</term><term>Daily life</term><term>Daily performances</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental disease</term><term>Dental ecology</term><term>Dental hygiene</term><term>Dental impact</term><term>Dental patients</term><term>Dental treatment</term><term>Disability paradox</term><term>Ecology</term><term>Everyday life</term><term>Feinstein</term><term>Functional status</term><term>Further development</term><term>Gill</term><term>Global ratings</term><term>Gohai</term><term>Gohai scores</term><term>Group level</term><term>Guyatt</term><term>Health assessment index</term><term>Health care</term><term>Health indicators</term><term>Health professionals</term><term>Health quality</term><term>Health status</term><term>Health status indicators</term><term>Healthrelated quality</term><term>Icidh model</term><term>Impact item</term><term>Importance ratings</term><term>Individual patients</term><term>Individualized measures</term><term>Item impact study</term><term>Item pool</term><term>Journal compilation</term><term>Life instrument</term><term>Life inventory</term><term>Life measure</term><term>Life measures</term><term>Life questionnaire</term><term>Life questionnaires</term><term>Life satisfaction</term><term>Life test</term><term>Locker allen</term><term>Many measures</term><term>Measure quality</term><term>Methodological issues</term><term>Ohip</term><term>Oidp</term><term>Oral</term><term>Oral cavity</term><term>Oral conditions</term><term>Oral diseases</term><term>Oral disorders</term><term>Oral health</term><term>Oral health assessment index</term><term>Oral health impact</term><term>Oral health quality</term><term>Oral health research</term><term>Oral health status</term><term>Oral impacts</term><term>Oral quality</term><term>Other predictors</term><term>Other sources</term><term>Outcome measures</term><term>Overall quality</term><term>Psychosocial</term><term>Psychosocial impacts</term><term>Psychosocial outcomes</term><term>Qualitative component</term><term>Qualitative interviews</term><term>Qualitative studies</term><term>Relative importance</term><term>Satisfaction questions</term><term>Slade</term><term>Social impact</term><term>Social impacts</term><term>Sroh items</term><term>Subjective health status measures</term><term>Such measures</term><term>Supplemental items</term><term>Target population</term><term>Terms quality</term><term>Various kinds</term><term>Wide range</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The terms ‘health‐related quality of life’ and ‘quality of life’ are now in common use to describe the outcomes of oral health conditions and therapy for those conditions. In addition, there has been a proliferation of measures designed to quantify those outcomes. These measures, which were initially designated as socio‐dental indicators or subjective oral health indicators are now more usually referred to as measures of oral health‐related quality of life (OH‐QoL). This is based on the assumption that the functional and psychosocial impacts they document must, of necessity, affect the quality of life. While this assumption has been subject to critical scrutiny in medicine, this is not the case with dentistry. Consequently, exactly what is being measured by indexes of OH‐QoL is somewhat unclear. Based on the debate between Gill and Feinstein and Guyatt and Cook, we outline a number of criteria by means of which the construct addressed by measures of OH‐QoL may be assessed. These are concerned with how the measures were developed and validated. These criteria are then used to appraise five of the many measures that have been developed over the past 20 years – the GOHAI, OHIP, OIDP, COHQoL and OH‐QoL. The main conclusion is that while all document the frequency of the functional and psychosocial impacts that emanate from oral disorders they do not unequivocally establish the meaning and significance of those impacts. Consequently, the claim that oral disorders affect the quality of life has yet to be clearly demonstrated. Verifying this claim requires further qualitative studies of the outcomes of oral disorders as perceived by patients and persons, and the concurrent use of measures that more explicitly address the issue of quality of life.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>oral health</json:string><json:string>oral quality</json:string><json:string>guyatt</json:string><json:string>feinstein</json:string><json:string>oidp</json:string><json:string>oral disorders</json:string><json:string>psychosocial</json:string><json:string>health status</json:string><json:string>ohip</json:string><json:string>gohai</json:string><json:string>clinical trials</json:string><json:string>slade</json:string><json:string>ecology</json:string><json:string>chapel hill</json:string><json:string>dental ecology</json:string><json:string>qualitative interviews</json:string><json:string>functional status</json:string><json:string>psychosocial impacts</json:string><json:string>oral health status</json:string><json:string>global ratings</json:string><json:string>life inventory</json:string><json:string>life satisfaction</json:string><json:string>oral health quality</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>life measures</json:string><json:string>oral impacts</json:string><json:string>health quality</json:string><json:string>oral diseases</json:string><json:string>daily performances</json:string><json:string>locker allen</json:string><json:string>health assessment index</json:string><json:string>healthrelated quality</json:string><json:string>oral conditions</json:string><json:string>importance ratings</json:string><json:string>individual patients</json:string><json:string>life measure</json:string><json:string>life questionnaire</json:string><json:string>item impact study</json:string><json:string>clinical practice</json:string><json:string>many measures</json:string><json:string>oral health impact</json:string><json:string>social impact</json:string><json:string>child patients</json:string><json:string>satisfaction questions</json:string><json:string>sroh items</json:string><json:string>outcome measures</json:string><json:string>health care</json:string><json:string>community dent</json:string><json:string>terms quality</json:string><json:string>gill</json:string><json:string>supplemental items</json:string><json:string>health indicators</json:string><json:string>measure quality</json:string><json:string>daily life</json:string><json:string>community dent health</json:string><json:string>journal compilation</json:string><json:string>target population</json:string><json:string>other sources</json:string><json:string>content validity</json:string><json:string>criterion validity</json:string><json:string>qualitative studies</json:string><json:string>health status indicators</json:string><json:string>impact item</json:string><json:string>such measures</json:string><json:string>individualized measures</json:string><json:string>group level</json:string><json:string>constituent domains</json:string><json:string>oral cavity</json:string><json:string>life questionnaires</json:string><json:string>dental treatment</json:string><json:string>gohai scores</json:string><json:string>other predictors</json:string><json:string>everyday life</json:string><json:string>icidh model</json:string><json:string>social impacts</json:string><json:string>dental patients</json:string><json:string>item pool</json:string><json:string>qualitative component</json:string><json:string>relative importance</json:string><json:string>wide range</json:string><json:string>psychosocial outcomes</json:string><json:string>health professionals</json:string><json:string>dental disease</json:string><json:string>oral health assessment index</json:string><json:string>various kinds</json:string><json:string>life test</json:string><json:string>current measures</json:string><json:string>disability paradox</json:string><json:string>dental impact</json:string><json:string>subjective health status measures</json:string><json:string>oral health research</json:string><json:string>further development</json:string><json:string>critical appraisal</json:string><json:string>overall quality</json:string><json:string>dental hygiene</json:string><json:string>methodological issues</json:string><json:string>life instrument</json:string><json:string>oral</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>David Locker</name><affiliations><json:string>Community Dental Health Services Research Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Canada</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Finbarr Allen</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Restorative Dentistry, University Dental School and Hospital, Cork, Ireland</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>measurement</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>oral health</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>oral health‐related quality of life</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>patient‐based outcomes</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>quality of life</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CDOE418</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-FB89WQ4Z-Q</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>commentary</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The terms ‘health‐related quality of life’ and ‘quality of life’ are now in common use to describe the outcomes of oral health conditions and therapy for those conditions. In addition, there has been a proliferation of measures designed to quantify those outcomes. These measures, which were initially designated as socio‐dental indicators or subjective oral health indicators are now more usually referred to as measures of oral health‐related quality of life (OH‐QoL). This is based on the assumption that the functional and psychosocial impacts they document must, of necessity, affect the quality of life. While this assumption has been subject to critical scrutiny in medicine, this is not the case with dentistry. Consequently, exactly what is being measured by indexes of OH‐QoL is somewhat unclear. Based on the debate between Gill and Feinstein and Guyatt and Cook, we outline a number of criteria by means of which the construct addressed by measures of OH‐QoL may be assessed. These are concerned with how the measures were developed and validated. These criteria are then used to appraise five of the many measures that have been developed over the past 20 years – the GOHAI, OHIP, OIDP, COHQoL and OH‐QoL. The main conclusion is that while all document the frequency of the functional and psychosocial impacts that emanate from oral disorders they do not unequivocally establish the meaning and significance of those impacts. Consequently, the claim that oral disorders affect the quality of life has yet to be clearly demonstrated. Verifying this claim requires further qualitative studies of the outcomes of oral disorders as perceived by patients and persons, and the concurrent use of measures that more explicitly address the issue of quality of life.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>10</score><pdfWordCount>7311</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>44970</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>11</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>280</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1769</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>What do measures of ‘oral health‐related quality of life’ measure?</title><pmid><json:string>18039281</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0528</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0301-5661</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0528</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CDOE</json:string></publisherId><volume>35</volume><issue>6</issue><pages><first>401</first><last>411</last><total>11</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1997</json:string><json:string>1990s</json:string><json:string>2007</json:string><json:string>2004</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>University of Toronto</json:string><json:string>WHOQOL Group</json:string><json:string>Department of Restorative Dentistry, University Dental School and Hospital</json:string><json:string>Canada Tel</json:string><json:string>World Health Organization</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Edward Street</json:string><json:string>David Locker</json:string><json:string>MacEntee</json:string><json:string>Allen Table</json:string><json:string>The</json:string><json:string>Finbarr</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>UK</json:string><json:string>Toronto</json:string><json:string>Ireland</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Fitzpatrick et al.</json:string><json:string>Carr et al.</json:string><json:string>Guyatt et al.</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-FB89WQ4Z-Q</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - social science</json:string><json:string>2 - public, environmental & occupational health</json:string><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences humaines et sociales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2007</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2007</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00418.x</json:string></doi><id>298E29CBD94E17B067B1F003506CFC24FBF6BFF1</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/298E29CBD94E17B067B1F003506CFC24FBF6BFF1/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/298E29CBD94E17B067B1F003506CFC24FBF6BFF1/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/298E29CBD94E17B067B1F003506CFC24FBF6BFF1/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">What do measures of ‘oral health‐related quality of life’ measure?</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-12"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="commentary" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">What do measures of ‘oral health‐related quality of life’ measure?</title><title level="a" type="short">Measures of oral health‐related quality of life</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">David</forename><surname>Locker</surname></persName><affiliation>Community Dental Health Services Research Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Canada<address><country key="CA"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Finbarr</forename><surname>Allen</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, University Dental School and Hospital, Cork, Ireland<address><country key="IE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">298E29CBD94E17B067B1F003506CFC24FBF6BFF1</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-FB89WQ4Z-Q</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00418.x</idno><idno type="unit">CDOE418</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CDOE.CDOE418.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology</title><title level="j" type="alt">COMMUNITY DENTISTRY ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY</title><idno type="pISSN">0301-5661</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0528</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0528</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/com.2007.35.issue-6</idno><idno type="product">CDOE</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">35</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="401">401</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="411">411</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">11</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-12"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p>The terms ‘health‐related quality of life’ and ‘quality of life’ are now in common use to describe the outcomes of oral health conditions and therapy for those conditions. In addition, there has been a proliferation of measures designed to quantify those outcomes. These measures, which were initially designated as socio‐dental indicators or subjective oral health indicators are now more usually referred to as measures of oral health‐related quality of life (OH‐QoL). This is based on the assumption that the functional and psychosocial impacts they document must, of necessity, affect the quality of life. While this assumption has been subject to critical scrutiny in medicine, this is not the case with dentistry. Consequently, exactly what is being measured by indexes of OH‐QoL is somewhat unclear. Based on the debate between Gill and Feinstein and Guyatt and Cook, we outline a number of criteria by means of which the construct addressed by measures of OH‐QoL may be assessed. These are concerned with how the measures were developed and validated. These criteria are then used to appraise five of the many measures that have been developed over the past 20 years – the GOHAI, OHIP, OIDP, COHQoL and OH‐QoL. The main conclusion is that while all document the frequency of the functional and psychosocial impacts that emanate from oral disorders they do not unequivocally establish the meaning and significance of those impacts. Consequently, the claim that oral disorders affect the quality of life has yet to be clearly demonstrated. Verifying this claim requires further qualitative studies of the outcomes of oral disorders as perceived by patients and persons, and the concurrent use of measures that more explicitly address the issue of quality of life.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">measurement</term><term xml:id="k2">oral health</term><term xml:id="k3">oral health‐related quality of life</term><term xml:id="k4">patient‐based outcomes</term><term xml:id="k5">quality of life</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Commentary</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/298E29CBD94E17B067B1F003506CFC24FBF6BFF1/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0528</doi><issn type="print">0301-5661</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0528</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CDOE"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="COMMUNITY DENTISTRY ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY">Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="12006"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/com.2007.35.issue-6</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="35">35</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="6">6</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2007-12">December 2007</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="commentary" position="1" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00418.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CDOE418"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="11"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Commentary</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2007-11-22"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-11-22"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-09"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-17"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="401">401</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="411">411</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>David Locker, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, 124, Edward Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1G6, Canada
Tel: +1 416 979 4907
Fax: +1 416 979 4936
e‐mail: <email>david.locker@utoronto.ca</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CDOE.CDOE418.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Submitted 5 November 2006; accepted 7 June 2007</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="2"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">What do measures of ‘oral health‐related quality of life’ measure?</title><title type="shortAuthors"><b>Locker & Allen</b></title><title type="short"><b>Measures of oral health‐related quality of life</b></title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>David</givenNames><familyName>Locker</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Finbarr</givenNames><familyName>Allen</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="CA"><unparsedAffiliation>Community Dental Health Services Research Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Canada</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="IE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, University Dental School and Hospital, Cork, Ireland</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">measurement</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">oral health</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">oral health‐related quality of life</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">patient‐based outcomes</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">quality of life</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><!--
Locker D, Allen F. What do measures of ‘oral health-related quality of life’ measure?. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007; 35: 401–411. © 2007 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Munksgaard
--><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>The terms ‘health‐related quality of life’ and ‘quality of life’ are now in common use to describe the outcomes of oral health conditions and therapy for those conditions. In addition, there has been a proliferation of measures designed to quantify those outcomes. These measures, which were initially designated as socio‐dental indicators or subjective oral health indicators are now more usually referred to as measures of oral health‐related quality of life (OH‐QoL). This is based on the assumption that the functional and psychosocial impacts they document must, of necessity, affect the quality of life. While this assumption has been subject to critical scrutiny in medicine, this is not the case with dentistry. Consequently, exactly what is being measured by indexes of OH‐QoL is somewhat unclear. Based on the debate between Gill and Feinstein and Guyatt and Cook, we outline a number of criteria by means of which the construct addressed by measures of OH‐QoL may be assessed. These are concerned with how the measures were developed and validated. These criteria are then used to appraise five of the many measures that have been developed over the past 20 years – the GOHAI, OHIP, OIDP, COHQoL and OH‐QoL. The main conclusion is that while all document the frequency of the functional and psychosocial impacts that emanate from oral disorders they do not unequivocally establish the meaning and significance of those impacts. Consequently, the claim that oral disorders affect the quality of life has yet to be clearly demonstrated. Verifying this claim requires further qualitative studies of the outcomes of oral disorders as perceived by patients and persons, and the concurrent use of measures that more explicitly address the issue of quality of life.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>What do measures of ‘oral health‐related quality of life’ measure?</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Measures of oral health‐related quality of life</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>What do measures of ‘oral health‐related quality of life’ measure?</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">David</namePart><namePart type="family">Locker</namePart><affiliation>Community Dental Health Services Research Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Canada</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Finbarr</namePart><namePart type="family">Allen</namePart><affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, University Dental School and Hospital, Cork, Ireland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="commentary" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2007-12</dateIssued><edition>Submitted 5 November 2006; accepted 7 June 2007</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2007</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">0</extent><extent unit="tables">2</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">The terms ‘health‐related quality of life’ and ‘quality of life’ are now in common use to describe the outcomes of oral health conditions and therapy for those conditions. In addition, there has been a proliferation of measures designed to quantify those outcomes. These measures, which were initially designated as socio‐dental indicators or subjective oral health indicators are now more usually referred to as measures of oral health‐related quality of life (OH‐QoL). This is based on the assumption that the functional and psychosocial impacts they document must, of necessity, affect the quality of life. While this assumption has been subject to critical scrutiny in medicine, this is not the case with dentistry. Consequently, exactly what is being measured by indexes of OH‐QoL is somewhat unclear. Based on the debate between Gill and Feinstein and Guyatt and Cook, we outline a number of criteria by means of which the construct addressed by measures of OH‐QoL may be assessed. These are concerned with how the measures were developed and validated. These criteria are then used to appraise five of the many measures that have been developed over the past 20 years – the GOHAI, OHIP, OIDP, COHQoL and OH‐QoL. The main conclusion is that while all document the frequency of the functional and psychosocial impacts that emanate from oral disorders they do not unequivocally establish the meaning and significance of those impacts. Consequently, the claim that oral disorders affect the quality of life has yet to be clearly demonstrated. Verifying this claim requires further qualitative studies of the outcomes of oral disorders as perceived by patients and persons, and the concurrent use of measures that more explicitly address the issue of quality of life.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>measurement</topic><topic>oral health</topic><topic>oral health‐related quality of life</topic><topic>patient‐based outcomes</topic><topic>quality of life</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0301-5661</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0528</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0528</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CDOE</identifier><part><date>2007</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>35</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>6</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>401</start><end>411</end><total>11</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">298E29CBD94E17B067B1F003506CFC24FBF6BFF1</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-FB89WQ4Z-Q</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00418.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CDOE418</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/298E29CBD94E17B067B1F003506CFC24FBF6BFF1/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001423 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001423 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:298E29CBD94E17B067B1F003506CFC24FBF6BFF1
|texte= What do measures of ‘oral health‐related quality of life’ measure?
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |