Two‐part implants inserted in a one‐stage or a two‐stage procedure
Identifieur interne : 001278 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001277; suivant : 001279Two‐part implants inserted in a one‐stage or a two‐stage procedure
Auteurs : Kees Heydenrijk ; Gerry M. Raghoebar ; Henny J. A. Meijer ; Willy A. Van Der Reijden ; Arie-Jan Van Winkelhoff ; Boudewijn StegengaSource :
- Journal of Clinical Periodontology [ 0303-6979 ] ; 2002-10.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- 1stage, 2stage, Abutment, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Actinomycetemcomitans, Baseline examination, Batenburg, Bone loss, Clinical microbiology, Clinical parameters, Clinical periodontology, Clinical variables, Danser, Data analysis, Dental implants, Dentistry, Denture, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Ericsson, Evaluation period, Forsythus, Frequency distribution, Gingiva, Gingiva score, Gingivalis, Heydenrijk, Implant, Implant failure, Implant insertion, Implant sites, Implants research, Insertion, International journal, Lindhe, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular denture, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Maxillofacial prosthetics, Maxillofacial surgery, Meijer, Microbiological, Microorganism, Micros, Mombelli, Nucleatum, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Osseointegration, Osseointegration period, Overdenture, Pathogen, Periodontal, Periodontal pathogens, Periodontology, Plaque, Plaque score, Pocket depth, Present study, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Quirynen, Radiograph, Radiographic, Surgical, Surgical procedure, Target microorganisms, Tissue breakdown, Titanium, Titanium implants, Winkelhoff.
- Teeft :
- 1stage, 2stage, Abutment, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Actinomycetemcomitans, Baseline examination, Batenburg, Bone loss, Clinical microbiology, Clinical parameters, Clinical periodontology, Clinical variables, Danser, Data analysis, Dental implants, Dentistry, Denture, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Ericsson, Evaluation period, Forsythus, Frequency distribution, Gingiva, Gingiva score, Gingivalis, Heydenrijk, Implant, Implant failure, Implant insertion, Implant sites, Implants research, Insertion, International journal, Lindhe, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular denture, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Maxillofacial prosthetics, Maxillofacial surgery, Meijer, Microbiological, Microorganism, Micros, Mombelli, Nucleatum, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Osseointegration, Osseointegration period, Overdenture, Pathogen, Periodontal, Periodontal pathogens, Periodontology, Plaque, Plaque score, Pocket depth, Present study, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Quirynen, Radiograph, Radiographic, Surgical, Surgical procedure, Target microorganisms, Tissue breakdown, Titanium, Titanium implants, Winkelhoff.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using a two‐part implant system in a one‐stage procedure and to monitor the microflora in the peri‐implant area in relation to clinical and radiographic outcome.
Url:
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051X.2002.291005.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:265B23F67C697DB2B0D7487AD0A37F37314A6FC0Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Two‐part implants inserted in a one‐stage or a two‐stage procedure</title><author><name sortKey="Heydenrijk, Kees" sort="Heydenrijk, Kees" uniqKey="Heydenrijk K" first="Kees" last="Heydenrijk">Kees Heydenrijk</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics,</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, Gerry M" sort="Raghoebar, Gerry M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="Gerry M." last="Raghoebar">Gerry M. Raghoebar</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics,</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Meijer, Henny J A" sort="Meijer, Henny J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="Henny J. A." last="Meijer">Henny J. A. Meijer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics,</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen,</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Der Reijden, Willy A" sort="Van Der Reijden, Willy A" uniqKey="Van Der Reijden W" first="Willy A." last="Van Der Reijden">Willy A. Van Der Reijden</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Microbiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, the Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Winkelhoff, Arie An" sort="Van Winkelhoff, Arie An" uniqKey="Van Winkelhoff A" first="Arie-Jan" last="Van Winkelhoff">Arie-Jan Van Winkelhoff</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Microbiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, the Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Stegenga, Boudewijn" sort="Stegenga, Boudewijn" uniqKey="Stegenga B" first="Boudewijn" last="Stegenga">Boudewijn Stegenga</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics,</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:265B23F67C697DB2B0D7487AD0A37F37314A6FC0</idno><date when="2002" year="2002">2002</date><idno type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-051X.2002.291005.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/265B23F67C697DB2B0D7487AD0A37F37314A6FC0/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001278</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001278</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Two‐part implants inserted in a one‐stage or a two‐stage procedure</title><author><name sortKey="Heydenrijk, Kees" sort="Heydenrijk, Kees" uniqKey="Heydenrijk K" first="Kees" last="Heydenrijk">Kees Heydenrijk</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics,</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, Gerry M" sort="Raghoebar, Gerry M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="Gerry M." last="Raghoebar">Gerry M. Raghoebar</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics,</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Meijer, Henny J A" sort="Meijer, Henny J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="Henny J. A." last="Meijer">Henny J. A. Meijer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics,</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen,</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Der Reijden, Willy A" sort="Van Der Reijden, Willy A" uniqKey="Van Der Reijden W" first="Willy A." last="Van Der Reijden">Willy A. Van Der Reijden</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Microbiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, the Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Winkelhoff, Arie An" sort="Van Winkelhoff, Arie An" uniqKey="Van Winkelhoff A" first="Arie-Jan" last="Van Winkelhoff">Arie-Jan Van Winkelhoff</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Microbiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, the Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Stegenga, Boudewijn" sort="Stegenga, Boudewijn" uniqKey="Stegenga B" first="Boudewijn" last="Stegenga">Boudewijn Stegenga</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics,</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-051X</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">29</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="901">901</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="909">909</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-10">2002-10</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>1stage</term><term>2stage</term><term>Abutment</term><term>Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans</term><term>Actinomycetemcomitans</term><term>Baseline examination</term><term>Batenburg</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Clinical microbiology</term><term>Clinical parameters</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Clinical variables</term><term>Danser</term><term>Data analysis</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Ericsson</term><term>Evaluation period</term><term>Forsythus</term><term>Frequency distribution</term><term>Gingiva</term><term>Gingiva score</term><term>Gingivalis</term><term>Heydenrijk</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant insertion</term><term>Implant sites</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Insertion</term><term>International journal</term><term>Lindhe</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular denture</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Maxillofacial prosthetics</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Meijer</term><term>Microbiological</term><term>Microorganism</term><term>Micros</term><term>Mombelli</term><term>Nucleatum</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Osseointegration period</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Pathogen</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal pathogens</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Plaque</term><term>Plaque score</term><term>Pocket depth</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Quirynen</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical procedure</term><term>Target microorganisms</term><term>Tissue breakdown</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Winkelhoff</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>1stage</term><term>2stage</term><term>Abutment</term><term>Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans</term><term>Actinomycetemcomitans</term><term>Baseline examination</term><term>Batenburg</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Clinical microbiology</term><term>Clinical parameters</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Clinical variables</term><term>Danser</term><term>Data analysis</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Ericsson</term><term>Evaluation period</term><term>Forsythus</term><term>Frequency distribution</term><term>Gingiva</term><term>Gingiva score</term><term>Gingivalis</term><term>Heydenrijk</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant insertion</term><term>Implant sites</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Insertion</term><term>International journal</term><term>Lindhe</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular denture</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Maxillofacial prosthetics</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Meijer</term><term>Microbiological</term><term>Microorganism</term><term>Micros</term><term>Mombelli</term><term>Nucleatum</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Osseointegration period</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Pathogen</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal pathogens</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Plaque</term><term>Plaque score</term><term>Pocket depth</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Quirynen</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical procedure</term><term>Target microorganisms</term><term>Tissue breakdown</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Winkelhoff</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using a two‐part implant system in a one‐stage procedure and to monitor the microflora in the peri‐implant area in relation to clinical and radiographic outcome.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>periodontology</json:string><json:string>radiographic</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>micros</json:string><json:string>periodontal</json:string><json:string>winkelhoff</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>pathogen</json:string><json:string>mombelli</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>gingivalis</json:string><json:string>heydenrijk</json:string><json:string>actinomycetemcomitans</json:string><json:string>ericsson</json:string><json:string>overdenture</json:string><json:string>gingiva</json:string><json:string>quirynen</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>clinical periodontology</json:string><json:string>batenburg</json:string><json:string>microbiological</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>pocket depth</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>nucleatum</json:string><json:string>forsythus</json:string><json:string>2stage</json:string><json:string>plaque score</json:string><json:string>lindhe</json:string><json:string>meijer</json:string><json:string>1stage</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>radiograph</json:string><json:string>osseointegration</json:string><json:string>danser</json:string><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>insertion</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>gingiva score</json:string><json:string>surgical procedure</json:string><json:string>periodontal pathogens</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>implant insertion</json:string><json:string>clinical parameters</json:string><json:string>evaluation period</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>frequency distribution</json:string><json:string>titanium implants</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial surgery</json:string><json:string>baseline examination</json:string><json:string>plaque</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>microorganism</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>osseointegration period</json:string><json:string>actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans</json:string><json:string>implant failure</json:string><json:string>data analysis</json:string><json:string>tissue breakdown</json:string><json:string>mandibular denture</json:string><json:string>target microorganisms</json:string><json:string>clinical variables</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial prosthetics</json:string><json:string>implant sites</json:string><json:string>clinical microbiology</json:string><json:string>titanium</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Kees Heydenrijk</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics,</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Gerry M. Raghoebar</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics,</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Henny J. A. Meijer</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics,</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen,</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Willy A. Van Der Reijden</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral Microbiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, the Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Arie‐Jan Van Winkelhoff</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral Microbiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, the Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Boudewijn Stegenga</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics,</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>edentulous</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>overdenture</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>one‐stage</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>microorganisms</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>118</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-4P3WRV63-B</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using a two‐part implant system in a one‐stage procedure and to monitor the microflora in the peri‐implant area in relation to clinical and radiographic outcome.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.444</score><pdfWordCount>6226</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>40781</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595 x 794 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>37</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>230</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Two‐part implants inserted in a one‐stage or a two‐stage procedure</title><pmid><json:string>12445222</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0303-6979</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-051X</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JCPE</json:string></publisherId><volume>29</volume><issue>10</issue><pages><first>901</first><last>909</last><total>9</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2002</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>University Hospital Groningen</json:string><json:string>University of Groningen</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</json:string><json:string>Coe Laboratories, Inc</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral Microbiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, the Netherlands Key</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Prosthetics</json:string><json:string>La Balme</json:string><json:string>The</json:string><json:string>Van Winkelhoff</json:string><json:string>J. A. Meijer</json:string><json:string>Willy A. van der Reijden</json:string><json:string>Arie-Jan van Winkelhoff</json:string><json:string>Gerry M. Raghoebar</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>IL</json:string><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>UK</json:string><json:string>Mannheim</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>Chicago</json:string><json:string>Palm Beach</json:string><json:string>France</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Apse et al. 1989</json:string><json:string>Koka et al. 1993</json:string><json:string>Van Winkelhoff et al. 1986</json:string><json:string>Salcetti et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Persson et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Syed & Loesche 1972</json:string><json:string>Becker et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Bernard et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Lindquist et al. 1988</json:string><json:string>Braham & Moncla 1992</json:string><json:string>Wennström & Palmer 1999</json:string><json:string>Haas et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Adell et al. 1990</json:string><json:string>Van Winkelhoff et al. 1985</json:string><json:string>Danser et al. (1997)</json:string><json:string>Rosenberg et al. 1991</json:string><json:string>Sanz et al. 1990</json:string><json:string>Meijer et al. 1993</json:string><json:string>Van Steenbergen et al. 1986</json:string><json:string>Danser et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Ericsson et al. 1994, 1997</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Heydenrijk et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Barber et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Meijer et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Danser et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Batenburg et al. 1998b</json:string><json:string>Augthun et al. (1997)</json:string><json:string>Papaioannou et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Kronström et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Hermann et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Lekholm et al. 1986b</json:string><json:string>Ericsson et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Keller et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Røynesdal et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Abrahamsson et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Lee et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Lindquist et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Batenburg et al. 1998a</json:string><json:string>Brägger et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Åstrand et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Buser et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Pontoriero et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Rams et al. 1991</json:string><json:string>Pham et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Ericsson et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Teerlinck et al. 1991</json:string><json:string>Adell et al. 1986</json:string><json:string>van Winkelhoff et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Mombelli et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Van Winkelhoff et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Sbordone et al. 1999</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-4P3WRV63-B</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Periodontics</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2002</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2002</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1034/j.1600-051X.2002.291005.x</json:string></doi><id>265B23F67C697DB2B0D7487AD0A37F37314A6FC0</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/265B23F67C697DB2B0D7487AD0A37F37314A6FC0/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/265B23F67C697DB2B0D7487AD0A37F37314A6FC0/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/265B23F67C697DB2B0D7487AD0A37F37314A6FC0/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Two‐part implants inserted in a one‐stage or a two‐stage procedure</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-10"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Two‐part implants inserted in a one‐stage or a two‐stage procedure</title><title level="a" type="sub">A prospective comparative study</title><title level="a" type="short">Non‐submerged two‐part implants</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Kees</forename><surname>Heydenrijk</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics,</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Gerry M.</forename><surname>Raghoebar</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics,</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Henny J. A.</forename><surname>Meijer</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics,</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen,</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Willy A.</forename><surname>Van Der Reijden</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral Microbiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, the Netherlands<address><country key="NL"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Arie‐Jan</forename><surname>Van Winkelhoff</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral Microbiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, the Netherlands<address><country key="NL"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0005"><persName><forename type="first">Boudewijn</forename><surname>Stegenga</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics,</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">265B23F67C697DB2B0D7487AD0A37F37314A6FC0</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-4P3WRV63-B</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-051X.2002.291005.x</idno><idno type="supplier">118</idno><idno type="unit">JCPE291005</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JCPE.JCPE291005.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="pISSN">0303-6979</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-051X</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cpe.2002.29.issue-10</idno><idno type="product">JCPE</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">29</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="901">901</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="909">909</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-10"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p><hi rend="bold">Objective: </hi> The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using a two‐part implant system in a one‐stage procedure and to monitor the microflora in the peri‐implant area in relation to clinical and radiographic outcome.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Material and Methods:</hi> After randomisation, 40 edentulous patients (Cawood & Howell class V–VI) received two IMZ implants in the anterior mandible inserted by either a one‐stage (<hi rend="italic">n</hi> = 20) or a two‐stage (<hi rend="italic">n</hi> = 20) surgical procedure for overdenture treatment. A standardised clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed after denture insertion as well as 6 and 12 months thereafter. Twelve months after loading, peri‐implant samples were collected and analysed for the presence of putative periodontal pathogens using culture technique.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results:</hi> No striking differences were found between the two groups with regard to the clinical parameters during the evaluation period. The mean bone loss in the first year of functioning was 0.6 mm in both groups. With regard to the gingiva score, plaque score, bleeding score or bone loss between T0 and T12, no associations were found with the presence of the cultured microorganisms. An association was present between pockets ≥ 4 mm and the presence of <hi rend="italic">Peptostreptococcus micros</hi> in the two‐stage group.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusions:</hi> The short‐term results indicate that two‐part implants inserted in a one‐stage procedure may be as predictable as inserted in the common two‐stage procedure. The peri‐implant sulcus can and does harbour potential periodontal pathogens without significant signs of tissue breakdown.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">dental implants</term><term xml:id="k2">edentulous</term><term xml:id="k3">overdenture</term><term xml:id="k4">one‐stage</term><term xml:id="k5">microorganisms </term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/265B23F67C697DB2B0D7487AD0A37F37314A6FC0/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</doi><issn type="print">0303-6979</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-051X</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JCPE"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="10010"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cpe.2002.29.issue-10</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="29">29</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="10">10</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2002-10">October 2002</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0090100" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1034/j.1600-051X.2002.291005.x</doi><idGroup><id type="supplier" value="118"></id><id type="unit" value="JCPE291005"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="9"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2002-11-19"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2002-11-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-09"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-23"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="901">901</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="909">909</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><i>Kees Heydenrijk</i>
<i>University Hospital Groningen</i>
<i>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics</i>
<i>PO Box 30001</i>
<i>9700 RB Groningen</i>
<i>the Netherlands</i>
Tel: + 31 503616161
Fax: + 31 503612831
e‐mail: <email>k.heydenrijk@kchir.azg.nl</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JCPE.JCPE291005.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication 30 October 2001</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="1"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="67"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="6787"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="58"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Two‐part implants inserted in a one‐stage or a two‐stage procedure</title><title type="subtitle">A prospective comparative study</title><title type="shortAuthors">Heydenrijk et al.</title><title type="short">Non‐submerged two‐part implants</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Kees</givenNames><familyName>Heydenrijk</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Gerry M.</givenNames><familyName>Raghoebar</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1 #a2"><personName><givenNames>Henny J. A.</givenNames><familyName>Meijer</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Willy A.</givenNames><familyName>Van Der Reijden</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Arie‐Jan</givenNames><familyName>Van Winkelhoff</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr6" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Boudewijn</givenNames><familyName>Stegenga</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics,</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen,</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="NL"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Oral Microbiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, the Netherlands</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">dental implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">edentulous</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">overdenture</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">one‐stage</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">microorganisms </keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><!--
Heydenrijk K, Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJA, van der Reijden WA, van Winkelhoff A-J, Stegenga B. Two-part implants inserted in a one-stage or a two-stage procedure. A prospective comparative study. J Clin Periodontol 2002; 29: 900–909.
--><title type="main">Abstract</title><p><b>Objective: </b> The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using a two‐part implant system in a one‐stage procedure and to monitor the microflora in the peri‐implant area in relation to clinical and radiographic outcome.</p><p><b>Material and Methods:</b> After randomisation, 40 edentulous patients (Cawood & Howell class V–VI) received two IMZ implants in the anterior mandible inserted by either a one‐stage (<i>n</i> = 20) or a two‐stage (<i>n</i> = 20) surgical procedure for overdenture treatment. A standardised clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed after denture insertion as well as 6 and 12 months thereafter. Twelve months after loading, peri‐implant samples were collected and analysed for the presence of putative periodontal pathogens using culture technique.</p><p><b>Results:</b> No striking differences were found between the two groups with regard to the clinical parameters during the evaluation period. The mean bone loss in the first year of functioning was 0.6 mm in both groups. With regard to the gingiva score, plaque score, bleeding score or bone loss between T0 and T12, no associations were found with the presence of the cultured microorganisms. An association was present between pockets ≥ 4 mm and the presence of <i>Peptostreptococcus micros</i> in the two‐stage group.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> The short‐term results indicate that two‐part implants inserted in a one‐stage procedure may be as predictable as inserted in the common two‐stage procedure. The peri‐implant sulcus can and does harbour potential periodontal pathogens without significant signs of tissue breakdown.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Two‐part implants inserted in a one‐stage or a two‐stage procedure</title><subTitle>A prospective comparative study</subTitle></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Non‐submerged two‐part implants</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Two‐part implants inserted in a one‐stage or a two‐stage procedure</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Kees</namePart><namePart type="family">Heydenrijk</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics,</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Gerry M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Raghoebar</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics,</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Henny J. A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Meijer</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics,</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen,</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Willy A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Van Der Reijden</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral Microbiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, the Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Arie‐Jan</namePart><namePart type="family">Van Winkelhoff</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral Microbiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, the Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Boudewijn</namePart><namePart type="family">Stegenga</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics,</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2002-10</dateIssued><edition>Accepted for publication 30 October 2001</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2002</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">0</extent><extent unit="tables">1</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">67</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">6787</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using a two‐part implant system in a one‐stage procedure and to monitor the microflora in the peri‐implant area in relation to clinical and radiographic outcome.</abstract><abstract>Material and Methods: After randomisation, 40 edentulous patients (Cawood & Howell class V–VI) received two IMZ implants in the anterior mandible inserted by either a one‐stage (n = 20) or a two‐stage (n = 20) surgical procedure for overdenture treatment. A standardised clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed after denture insertion as well as 6 and 12 months thereafter. Twelve months after loading, peri‐implant samples were collected and analysed for the presence of putative periodontal pathogens using culture technique.</abstract><abstract>Results: No striking differences were found between the two groups with regard to the clinical parameters during the evaluation period. The mean bone loss in the first year of functioning was 0.6 mm in both groups. With regard to the gingiva score, plaque score, bleeding score or bone loss between T0 and T12, no associations were found with the presence of the cultured microorganisms. An association was present between pockets ≥ 4 mm and the presence of Peptostreptococcus micros in the two‐stage group.</abstract><abstract>Conclusions: The short‐term results indicate that two‐part implants inserted in a one‐stage procedure may be as predictable as inserted in the common two‐stage procedure. The peri‐implant sulcus can and does harbour potential periodontal pathogens without significant signs of tissue breakdown.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>dental implants</topic><topic>edentulous</topic><topic>overdenture</topic><topic>one‐stage</topic><topic>microorganisms</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0303-6979</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-051X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JCPE</identifier><part><date>2002</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>29</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>10</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>901</start><end>909</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">265B23F67C697DB2B0D7487AD0A37F37314A6FC0</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-4P3WRV63-B</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-051X.2002.291005.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">118</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Munksgaard International Publishers</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/265B23F67C697DB2B0D7487AD0A37F37314A6FC0/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001278 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001278 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:265B23F67C697DB2B0D7487AD0A37F37314A6FC0
|texte= Two‐part implants inserted in a one‐stage or a two‐stage procedure
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |