Small‐Diameter Implants: Indications and Contraindications
Identifieur interne : 001130 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001129; suivant : 001131Small‐Diameter Implants: Indications and Contraindications
Auteurs : Mithridade Davarpanah ; Henry Martinez ; Jean-Francois Tecucianu ; Renato Celletti ; Richard LazzaraSource :
- Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry [ 1496-4155 ] ; 2000-07.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adjacent roots, Adjacent teeth, Alveolar crest, Biomechanical risk factors, Bone reconstruction, Clinical assistant professor, Clinical results, Clinical view, Collar diameter, Dental anatomy, Diameter implant, Different implant diameters, Different types, Emergence profile, Endosseous implants, Esthetic dentistry, Future prosthetic crown, Implant, Implant diameter, Implant innovations, Incisor, Interradicular bone, Long implants, Mandibular, Maxillary, Mesiodistal, Mesiodistal prosthetic space, Mesiodistal space, Narrow collar, Narrow ridges, Nobel biocare, Occlusal forces, Oral maxillofac implants, Orthodontic treatment, Osseointegrated implants, Parodontol implantologie orale, Posterior segments, Preliminary report, Premolar mandibular, Private practice, Prosthetic, Prosthetic reconstruction, Radiographic, Radiographic view, Replacement tooth, Residual bone, Rnesiodistal space, Scan cuts, Smalldiameter implants, Standard collar, Standard implant, Standard implants, Success rate, Thin alveolar crest, Traction forces, Treatment option.
- Teeft :
- Adjacent roots, Adjacent teeth, Alveolar crest, Biomechanical risk factors, Bone reconstruction, Clinical assistant professor, Clinical results, Clinical view, Collar diameter, Dental anatomy, Diameter implant, Different implant diameters, Different types, Emergence profile, Endosseous implants, Esthetic dentistry, Future prosthetic crown, Implant, Implant diameter, Implant innovations, Incisor, Interradicular bone, Long implants, Mandibular, Maxillary, Mesiodistal, Mesiodistal prosthetic space, Mesiodistal space, Narrow collar, Narrow ridges, Nobel biocare, Occlusal forces, Oral maxillofac implants, Orthodontic treatment, Osseointegrated implants, Parodontol implantologie orale, Posterior segments, Preliminary report, Premolar mandibular, Private practice, Prosthetic, Prosthetic reconstruction, Radiographic, Radiographic view, Replacement tooth, Residual bone, Rnesiodistal space, Scan cuts, Smalldiameter implants, Standard collar, Standard implant, Standard implants, Success rate, Thin alveolar crest, Traction forces, Treatment option.
Abstract
The choice of implant diameter depends on the type of edentulousness, the volume of the residual bone, the amount of space available for the prosthetic reconstruction, the emergence profile, and the type of occlusion. Small‐diameter implants are indicated in specific clinical situations, for example, where there is reduced interradicular bone or a thin alveolar crest, and for the replacement of teeth with small cervical diameter. Before using a small‐diameter implant, the biomechanical risk factors must be carefully analyzed. Preliminary reports of this type of implant show good short‐ and medium‐term results. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Specific clinical situations indicate the use of small‐diameter implants: a reduced amount of bone (thin alveolar crest) and where the replacement tooth requires a small cervical diameter. In some cases, the use of small‐diameter implants avoids bone reconstruction.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00221.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:233250175DF53446B14D8D71D24B1FB4DD366821Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Small‐Diameter Implants: Indications and Contraindications</title><author><name sortKey="Davarpanah, Mithridade" sort="Davarpanah, Mithridade" uniqKey="Davarpanah M" first="Mithridade" last="Davarpanah">Mithridade Davarpanah</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontology, Hôpital Pitié‐Salpêtrière, Paris; and Private Practice, Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: m.davarpanah@wanadoo.fr</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Martinez, Henry" sort="Martinez, Henry" uniqKey="Martinez H" first="Henry" last="Martinez">Henry Martinez</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, University of Paris 7, Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Tecucianu, Jean Rancois" sort="Tecucianu, Jean Rancois" uniqKey="Tecucianu J" first="Jean-Francois" last="Tecucianu">Jean-Francois Tecucianu</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Professor and Chairman of Periodontics, Department of Periodontology, Hôpital Pitié‐Salpêtriere, Paris; and Private Practice, Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Celletti, Renato" sort="Celletti, Renato" uniqKey="Celletti R" first="Renato" last="Celletti">Renato Celletti</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontology, University of G. ? Annunzio, Chieti; and Private Practice, Rome, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lazzara, Richard" sort="Lazzara, Richard" uniqKey="Lazzara R" first="Richard" last="Lazzara">Richard Lazzara</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Clinical Assistant Professor, Periodontal and Implant Regenerative Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:233250175DF53446B14D8D71D24B1FB4DD366821</idno><date when="2000" year="2000">2000</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00221.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/233250175DF53446B14D8D71D24B1FB4DD366821/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001130</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001130</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Small‐Diameter Implants: Indications and Contraindications</title><author><name sortKey="Davarpanah, Mithridade" sort="Davarpanah, Mithridade" uniqKey="Davarpanah M" first="Mithridade" last="Davarpanah">Mithridade Davarpanah</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontology, Hôpital Pitié‐Salpêtrière, Paris; and Private Practice, Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: m.davarpanah@wanadoo.fr</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Martinez, Henry" sort="Martinez, Henry" uniqKey="Martinez H" first="Henry" last="Martinez">Henry Martinez</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, University of Paris 7, Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Tecucianu, Jean Rancois" sort="Tecucianu, Jean Rancois" uniqKey="Tecucianu J" first="Jean-Francois" last="Tecucianu">Jean-Francois Tecucianu</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Professor and Chairman of Periodontics, Department of Periodontology, Hôpital Pitié‐Salpêtriere, Paris; and Private Practice, Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Celletti, Renato" sort="Celletti, Renato" uniqKey="Celletti R" first="Renato" last="Celletti">Renato Celletti</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontology, University of G. ? Annunzio, Chieti; and Private Practice, Rome, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lazzara, Richard" sort="Lazzara, Richard" uniqKey="Lazzara R" first="Richard" last="Lazzara">Richard Lazzara</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Clinical Assistant Professor, Periodontal and Implant Regenerative Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY</title><idno type="ISSN">1496-4155</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8240</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="186">186</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="194">194</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-07">2000-07</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1496-4155</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1496-4155</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adjacent roots</term><term>Adjacent teeth</term><term>Alveolar crest</term><term>Biomechanical risk factors</term><term>Bone reconstruction</term><term>Clinical assistant professor</term><term>Clinical results</term><term>Clinical view</term><term>Collar diameter</term><term>Dental anatomy</term><term>Diameter implant</term><term>Different implant diameters</term><term>Different types</term><term>Emergence profile</term><term>Endosseous implants</term><term>Esthetic dentistry</term><term>Future prosthetic crown</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant diameter</term><term>Implant innovations</term><term>Incisor</term><term>Interradicular bone</term><term>Long implants</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Mesiodistal</term><term>Mesiodistal prosthetic space</term><term>Mesiodistal space</term><term>Narrow collar</term><term>Narrow ridges</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Occlusal forces</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Orthodontic treatment</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Parodontol implantologie orale</term><term>Posterior segments</term><term>Preliminary report</term><term>Premolar mandibular</term><term>Private practice</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic reconstruction</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic view</term><term>Replacement tooth</term><term>Residual bone</term><term>Rnesiodistal space</term><term>Scan cuts</term><term>Smalldiameter implants</term><term>Standard collar</term><term>Standard implant</term><term>Standard implants</term><term>Success rate</term><term>Thin alveolar crest</term><term>Traction forces</term><term>Treatment option</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Adjacent roots</term><term>Adjacent teeth</term><term>Alveolar crest</term><term>Biomechanical risk factors</term><term>Bone reconstruction</term><term>Clinical assistant professor</term><term>Clinical results</term><term>Clinical view</term><term>Collar diameter</term><term>Dental anatomy</term><term>Diameter implant</term><term>Different implant diameters</term><term>Different types</term><term>Emergence profile</term><term>Endosseous implants</term><term>Esthetic dentistry</term><term>Future prosthetic crown</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant diameter</term><term>Implant innovations</term><term>Incisor</term><term>Interradicular bone</term><term>Long implants</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Mesiodistal</term><term>Mesiodistal prosthetic space</term><term>Mesiodistal space</term><term>Narrow collar</term><term>Narrow ridges</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Occlusal forces</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Orthodontic treatment</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Parodontol implantologie orale</term><term>Posterior segments</term><term>Preliminary report</term><term>Premolar mandibular</term><term>Private practice</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic reconstruction</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic view</term><term>Replacement tooth</term><term>Residual bone</term><term>Rnesiodistal space</term><term>Scan cuts</term><term>Smalldiameter implants</term><term>Standard collar</term><term>Standard implant</term><term>Standard implants</term><term>Success rate</term><term>Thin alveolar crest</term><term>Traction forces</term><term>Treatment option</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The choice of implant diameter depends on the type of edentulousness, the volume of the residual bone, the amount of space available for the prosthetic reconstruction, the emergence profile, and the type of occlusion. Small‐diameter implants are indicated in specific clinical situations, for example, where there is reduced interradicular bone or a thin alveolar crest, and for the replacement of teeth with small cervical diameter. Before using a small‐diameter implant, the biomechanical risk factors must be carefully analyzed. Preliminary reports of this type of implant show good short‐ and medium‐term results. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Specific clinical situations indicate the use of small‐diameter implants: a reduced amount of bone (thin alveolar crest) and where the replacement tooth requires a small cervical diameter. In some cases, the use of small‐diameter implants avoids bone reconstruction.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>maxillary</json:string><json:string>mesiodistal</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>incisor</json:string><json:string>radiographic</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>emergence profile</json:string><json:string>standard implant</json:string><json:string>implant diameter</json:string><json:string>nobel biocare</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>adjacent roots</json:string><json:string>interradicular bone</json:string><json:string>success rate</json:string><json:string>mesiodistal prosthetic space</json:string><json:string>implant innovations</json:string><json:string>clinical assistant professor</json:string><json:string>standard collar</json:string><json:string>narrow collar</json:string><json:string>esthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>narrow ridges</json:string><json:string>occlusal forces</json:string><json:string>alveolar crest</json:string><json:string>orthodontic treatment</json:string><json:string>clinical view</json:string><json:string>different types</json:string><json:string>biomechanical risk factors</json:string><json:string>replacement tooth</json:string><json:string>private practice</json:string><json:string>clinical results</json:string><json:string>long implants</json:string><json:string>different implant diameters</json:string><json:string>smalldiameter implants</json:string><json:string>bone reconstruction</json:string><json:string>preliminary report</json:string><json:string>prosthetic reconstruction</json:string><json:string>collar diameter</json:string><json:string>residual bone</json:string><json:string>diameter implant</json:string><json:string>rnesiodistal space</json:string><json:string>endosseous implants</json:string><json:string>scan cuts</json:string><json:string>radiographic view</json:string><json:string>future prosthetic crown</json:string><json:string>adjacent teeth</json:string><json:string>standard implants</json:string><json:string>treatment option</json:string><json:string>traction forces</json:string><json:string>premolar mandibular</json:string><json:string>dental anatomy</json:string><json:string>thin alveolar crest</json:string><json:string>mesiodistal space</json:string><json:string>parodontol implantologie orale</json:string><json:string>posterior segments</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>MITHRIDADE DAVARPANAH MD, DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontology, Hôpital Pitié‐Salpêtrière, Paris; and Private Practice, Paris, France</json:string><json:string>E-mail: m.davarpanah@wanadoo.fr</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>HENRY MARTINEZ DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, University of Paris 7, Paris, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>JEAN‐FRANCOIS TECUCIANU MD, DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Professor and Chairman of Periodontics, Department of Periodontology, Hôpital Pitié‐Salpêtriere, Paris; and Private Practice, Paris, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>RENATO CELLETTI DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontology, University of G. ? Annunzio, Chieti; and Private Practice, Rome, Italy</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>RICHARD LAZZARA DMD, MScD</name><affiliations><json:string>Clinical Assistant Professor, Periodontal and Implant Regenerative Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>JERD186</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-MX11DSZ2-9</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The choice of implant diameter depends on the type of edentulousness, the volume of the residual bone, the amount of space available for the prosthetic reconstruction, the emergence profile, and the type of occlusion. Small‐diameter implants are indicated in specific clinical situations, for example, where there is reduced interradicular bone or a thin alveolar crest, and for the replacement of teeth with small cervical diameter. Before using a small‐diameter implant, the biomechanical risk factors must be carefully analyzed. Preliminary reports of this type of implant show good short‐ and medium‐term results. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Specific clinical situations indicate the use of small‐diameter implants: a reduced amount of bone (thin alveolar crest) and where the replacement tooth requires a small cervical diameter. In some cases, the use of small‐diameter implants avoids bone reconstruction.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.409</score><pdfWordCount>2837</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>17911</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>576 x 827.759 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>131</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>906</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>0</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Small‐Diameter Implants: Indications and Contraindications</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8240</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1496-4155</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8240</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JERD</json:string></publisherId><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><pages><first>186</first><last>194</last><total>9</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1003</json:string><json:string>2000</json:string><json:string>1871</json:string><json:string>1990s</json:string><json:string>1499</json:string><json:string>1374</json:string><json:string>1988</json:string><json:string>1980s</json:string><json:string>1996</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Sulzer Calcitek, Inc.</json:string><json:string>Osteo Implant Corp.</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Matsushita</json:string><json:string>Lazzara</json:string><json:string>Rieger</json:string><json:string>Buser</json:string><json:string>Spiekermann</json:string><json:string>Sethi</json:string><json:string>Ed Cohen</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Switzerland</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>J Esthet Dent 12:186-194,2000</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-MX11DSZ2-9</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string><json:string>4 - sante publique. hygiene-medecine du travail</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2000</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2000</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00221.x</json:string></doi><id>233250175DF53446B14D8D71D24B1FB4DD366821</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/233250175DF53446B14D8D71D24B1FB4DD366821/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/233250175DF53446B14D8D71D24B1FB4DD366821/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/233250175DF53446B14D8D71D24B1FB4DD366821/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Small‐Diameter Implants: Indications and Contraindications</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-07"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Small‐Diameter Implants: Indications and Contraindications</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">MITHRIDADE</forename><surname>DAVARPANAH</surname><roleName type="degree">MD, DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontology, Hôpital Pitié‐Salpêtrière, Paris; and Private Practice, Paris, France<address><country key="FR"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Reprint requests: Mithridade Davarpanah, MD, DDS, 174 rue de courcelles, 75017 Paris; e‐mail: m.davarpanah@wanadoo.fr</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">HENRY</forename><surname>MARTINEZ</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, University of Paris 7, Paris, France<address><country key="FR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">JEAN‐FRANCOIS</forename><surname>TECUCIANU</surname><roleName type="degree">MD, DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Professor and Chairman of Periodontics, Department of Periodontology, Hôpital Pitié‐Salpêtriere, Paris; and Private Practice, Paris, France<address><country key="FR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">RENATO</forename><surname>CELLETTI</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontology, University of G. ? Annunzio, Chieti; and Private Practice, Rome, Italy<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">RICHARD</forename><surname>LAZZARA</surname><roleName type="degree">DMD, MScD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Clinical Assistant Professor, Periodontal and Implant Regenerative Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">233250175DF53446B14D8D71D24B1FB4DD366821</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-MX11DSZ2-9</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00221.x</idno><idno type="unit">JERD186</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JERD.JERD186.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY</title><idno type="pISSN">1496-4155</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8240</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8240</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/jerd.2000.12.issue-4</idno><idno type="product">JERD</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="186">186</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="194">194</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-07"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p>The choice of implant diameter depends on the type of edentulousness, the volume of the residual bone, the amount of space available for the prosthetic reconstruction, the emergence profile, and the type of occlusion. Small‐diameter implants are indicated in specific clinical situations, for example, where there is reduced interradicular bone or a thin alveolar crest, and for the replacement of teeth with small cervical diameter. Before using a small‐diameter implant, the biomechanical risk factors must be carefully analyzed. Preliminary reports of this type of implant show good short‐ and medium‐term results.</p><p>CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE</p><p>Specific clinical situations indicate the use of small‐diameter implants: a reduced amount of bone (thin alveolar crest) and where the replacement tooth requires a small cervical diameter. In some cases, the use of small‐diameter implants avoids bone reconstruction.</p></abstract><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/233250175DF53446B14D8D71D24B1FB4DD366821/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8240</doi><issn type="print">1496-4155</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8240</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JERD"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY">Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="07004"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jerd.2000.12.issue-4</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="12">12</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="4">4</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2000-07">July 2000</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0018600" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00221.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JERD186"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="9"></count></countGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2007-07-01"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-07-01"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.5 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-04-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-30"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-30"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="186">186</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="194">194</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Reprint requests: Mithridade Davarpanah, MD, DDS, 174 rue de courcelles, 75017 Paris; e‐mail: <email>m.davarpanah@wanadoo.fr</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JERD.JERD186.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="20"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="6"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Small‐Diameter Implants: Indications and Contraindications</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>MITHRIDADE</givenNames><familyName>DAVARPANAH</familyName><degrees>MD, DDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>HENRY</givenNames><familyName>MARTINEZ</familyName><degrees>DDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>JEAN‐FRANCOIS</givenNames><familyName>TECUCIANU</familyName><degrees>MD, DDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a4"><personName><givenNames>RENATO</givenNames><familyName>CELLETTI</familyName><degrees>DDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a5"><personName><givenNames>RICHARD</givenNames><familyName>LAZZARA</familyName><degrees>DMD, MScD</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="FR"><unparsedAffiliation>Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontology, Hôpital Pitié‐Salpêtrière, Paris; and Private Practice, Paris, France</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="FR"><unparsedAffiliation>Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, University of Paris 7, Paris, France</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="FR"><unparsedAffiliation>Professor and Chairman of Periodontics, Department of Periodontology, Hôpital Pitié‐Salpêtriere, Paris; and Private Practice, Paris, France</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="IT"><unparsedAffiliation>Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontology, University of G. ? Annunzio, Chieti; and Private Practice, Rome, Italy</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a5" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Clinical Assistant Professor, Periodontal and Implant Regenerative Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p>The choice of implant diameter depends on the type of edentulousness, the volume of the residual bone, the amount of space available for the prosthetic reconstruction, the emergence profile, and the type of occlusion. Small‐diameter implants are indicated in specific clinical situations, for example, where there is reduced interradicular bone or a thin alveolar crest, and for the replacement of teeth with small cervical diameter. Before using a small‐diameter implant, the biomechanical risk factors must be carefully analyzed. Preliminary reports of this type of implant show good short‐ and medium‐term results.</p><p>CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE</p><p>Specific clinical situations indicate the use of small‐diameter implants: a reduced amount of bone (thin alveolar crest) and where the replacement tooth requires a small cervical diameter. In some cases, the use of small‐diameter implants avoids bone reconstruction.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Small‐Diameter Implants: Indications and Contraindications</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Small‐Diameter Implants: Indications and Contraindications</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">MITHRIDADE</namePart><namePart type="family">DAVARPANAH</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">MD, DDS</namePart><affiliation>Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontology, Hôpital Pitié‐Salpêtrière, Paris; and Private Practice, Paris, France</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: m.davarpanah@wanadoo.fr</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">HENRY</namePart><namePart type="family">MARTINEZ</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, University of Paris 7, Paris, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">JEAN‐FRANCOIS</namePart><namePart type="family">TECUCIANU</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">MD, DDS</namePart><affiliation>Professor and Chairman of Periodontics, Department of Periodontology, Hôpital Pitié‐Salpêtriere, Paris; and Private Practice, Paris, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">RENATO</namePart><namePart type="family">CELLETTI</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontology, University of G. ? Annunzio, Chieti; and Private Practice, Rome, Italy</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">RICHARD</namePart><namePart type="family">LAZZARA</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DMD, MScD</namePart><affiliation>Clinical Assistant Professor, Periodontal and Implant Regenerative Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-07</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2000</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="references">20</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">6</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">The choice of implant diameter depends on the type of edentulousness, the volume of the residual bone, the amount of space available for the prosthetic reconstruction, the emergence profile, and the type of occlusion. Small‐diameter implants are indicated in specific clinical situations, for example, where there is reduced interradicular bone or a thin alveolar crest, and for the replacement of teeth with small cervical diameter. Before using a small‐diameter implant, the biomechanical risk factors must be carefully analyzed. Preliminary reports of this type of implant show good short‐ and medium‐term results. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Specific clinical situations indicate the use of small‐diameter implants: a reduced amount of bone (thin alveolar crest) and where the replacement tooth requires a small cervical diameter. In some cases, the use of small‐diameter implants avoids bone reconstruction.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1496-4155</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8240</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8240</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JERD</identifier><part><date>2000</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>12</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>186</start><end>194</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">233250175DF53446B14D8D71D24B1FB4DD366821</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-MX11DSZ2-9</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00221.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JERD186</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/233250175DF53446B14D8D71D24B1FB4DD366821/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001130 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001130 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:233250175DF53446B14D8D71D24B1FB4DD366821
|texte= Small‐Diameter Implants: Indications and Contraindications
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |