EdenteV2, Istex, Corpus, bibRecord, 001084

Are panoramic images reliable in planning sinus augmentation procedures?

Identifieur interne : 001084 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001083; suivant : 001085

Are panoramic images reliable in planning sinus augmentation procedures?

Auteurs : Andy Temmerman ; Stijn Hertelé ; Wim Teughels ; Christel Dekeyser ; Reinhilde Jacobs ; Marc Quirynen

Source :

Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2011-02.

RBID : ISTEX:2239235CADFD97481FAE0E1674F6F25C0809E1CB

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Alveolar artery, Anterior wall, Apical, Augmentation, Available bone, Available bone distance, Axial slices, Bone width, Bony canal, Bony vessel, Canal, Canine region, Catholic university leuven, Clinical periodontology, Computer tomography, Cone beam, Dentistry, Diameter years, Group years, Impax pacs, Implant, Implant placement, Implants research, Independent samples, International journal, John wiley sons, Lateral, Lateral sinus wall, Lateral wall, Linear regression lines, Maxillary, Maxillary sinus, Maxillofacial implants, Mesial side, Molar, Normal distribution interquartile range, Normality, Occlusal plane, Oral impl, Pacs lightbox, Palatal aspect, Panoramic, Panoramic images, Panoramic radiograph, Panoramic radiographs, Panoramic radiography, Periodontology, Premolar, Premolar area, Present study, Radiograph, Radiographic, Radiographic study, Radiography, Reformatted images, Sinus, Sinus augmentation, Sinus augmentation procedures, Sinus membrane, Standard deviation range test, Systematic review, Temmerman, Tomography, University hospital, Upper premolar region, Vascular structure.
Teeft :
- Alveolar artery, Anterior wall, Apical, Augmentation, Available bone, Available bone distance, Axial slices, Bone width, Bony canal, Bony vessel, Canal, Canine region, Catholic university leuven, Clinical periodontology, Computer tomography, Cone beam, Dentistry, Diameter years, Group years, Impax pacs, Implant, Implant placement, Implants research, Independent samples, International journal, John wiley sons, Lateral, Lateral sinus wall, Lateral wall, Linear regression lines, Maxillary, Maxillary sinus, Maxillofacial implants, Mesial side, Molar, Normal distribution interquartile range, Normality, Occlusal plane, Oral impl, Pacs lightbox, Palatal aspect, Panoramic, Panoramic images, Panoramic radiograph, Panoramic radiographs, Panoramic radiography, Periodontology, Premolar, Premolar area, Present study, Radiograph, Radiographic, Radiographic study, Radiography, Reformatted images, Sinus, Sinus augmentation, Sinus augmentation procedures, Sinus membrane, Standard deviation range test, Systematic review, Temmerman, Tomography, University hospital, Upper premolar region, Vascular structure.

Abstract

Objective: The inherent deformation and two‐dimensional nature of panoramic radiographs jeopardise their interpretation and quantitative measurements. This study aims to estimate the degree of underestimation of available mesio‐distal bone in the premolar area (comparing panoramic radiographs with multi‐slice/cone‐beam computer tomography [CT]) to determine the prevalence, width, length and position of the bony canal [artery] in the lateral sinus wall and to explore the prevalence, width and length of another (newly detected) bony canal at the palatal aspect of the upper canine.

Url:

https://api.istex.fr/document/2239235CADFD97481FAE0E1674F6F25C0809E1CB/fulltext/pdf

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02000.x

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:2239235CADFD97481FAE0E1674F6F25C0809E1CB

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Are panoramic images reliable in planning sinus augmentation procedures?</title>
<author><name sortKey="Temmerman, Andy" sort="Temmerman, Andy" uniqKey="Temmerman A" first="Andy" last="Temmerman">Andy Temmerman</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology & Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hertele, Stijn" sort="Hertele, Stijn" uniqKey="Hertele S" first="Stijn" last="Hertelé">Stijn Hertelé</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Mechanical Construction and Production, Faculty of Engineering, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Teughels, Wim" sort="Teughels, Wim" uniqKey="Teughels W" first="Wim" last="Teughels">Wim Teughels</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology & Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Dekeyser, Christel" sort="Dekeyser, Christel" uniqKey="Dekeyser C" first="Christel" last="Dekeyser">Christel Dekeyser</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology & Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Jacobs, Reinhilde" sort="Jacobs, Reinhilde" uniqKey="Jacobs R" first="Reinhilde" last="Jacobs">Reinhilde Jacobs</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral Imaging Centre, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology & Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Quirynen, Marc" sort="Quirynen, Marc" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="Marc" last="Quirynen">Marc Quirynen</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology & Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:2239235CADFD97481FAE0E1674F6F25C0809E1CB</idno>
<date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02000.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/2239235CADFD97481FAE0E1674F6F25C0809E1CB/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001084</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001084</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Are panoramic images reliable in planning sinus augmentation procedures?</title>
<author><name sortKey="Temmerman, Andy" sort="Temmerman, Andy" uniqKey="Temmerman A" first="Andy" last="Temmerman">Andy Temmerman</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology & Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hertele, Stijn" sort="Hertele, Stijn" uniqKey="Hertele S" first="Stijn" last="Hertelé">Stijn Hertelé</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Mechanical Construction and Production, Faculty of Engineering, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Teughels, Wim" sort="Teughels, Wim" uniqKey="Teughels W" first="Wim" last="Teughels">Wim Teughels</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology & Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Dekeyser, Christel" sort="Dekeyser, Christel" uniqKey="Dekeyser C" first="Christel" last="Dekeyser">Christel Dekeyser</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology & Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Jacobs, Reinhilde" sort="Jacobs, Reinhilde" uniqKey="Jacobs R" first="Reinhilde" last="Jacobs">Reinhilde Jacobs</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral Imaging Centre, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology & Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Quirynen, Marc" sort="Quirynen, Marc" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="Marc" last="Quirynen">Marc Quirynen</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology & Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">22</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="189">189</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="194">194</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2011-02">2011-02</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar artery</term>
<term>Anterior wall</term>
<term>Apical</term>
<term>Augmentation</term>
<term>Available bone</term>
<term>Available bone distance</term>
<term>Axial slices</term>
<term>Bone width</term>
<term>Bony canal</term>
<term>Bony vessel</term>
<term>Canal</term>
<term>Canine region</term>
<term>Catholic university leuven</term>
<term>Clinical periodontology</term>
<term>Computer tomography</term>
<term>Cone beam</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Diameter years</term>
<term>Group years</term>
<term>Impax pacs</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Implants research</term>
<term>Independent samples</term>
<term>International journal</term>
<term>John wiley sons</term>
<term>Lateral</term>
<term>Lateral sinus wall</term>
<term>Lateral wall</term>
<term>Linear regression lines</term>
<term>Maxillary</term>
<term>Maxillary sinus</term>
<term>Maxillofacial implants</term>
<term>Mesial side</term>
<term>Molar</term>
<term>Normal distribution interquartile range</term>
<term>Normality</term>
<term>Occlusal plane</term>
<term>Oral impl</term>
<term>Pacs lightbox</term>
<term>Palatal aspect</term>
<term>Panoramic</term>
<term>Panoramic images</term>
<term>Panoramic radiograph</term>
<term>Panoramic radiographs</term>
<term>Panoramic radiography</term>
<term>Periodontology</term>
<term>Premolar</term>
<term>Premolar area</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Radiograph</term>
<term>Radiographic</term>
<term>Radiographic study</term>
<term>Radiography</term>
<term>Reformatted images</term>
<term>Sinus</term>
<term>Sinus augmentation</term>
<term>Sinus augmentation procedures</term>
<term>Sinus membrane</term>
<term>Standard deviation range test</term>
<term>Systematic review</term>
<term>Temmerman</term>
<term>Tomography</term>
<term>University hospital</term>
<term>Upper premolar region</term>
<term>Vascular structure</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar artery</term>
<term>Anterior wall</term>
<term>Apical</term>
<term>Augmentation</term>
<term>Available bone</term>
<term>Available bone distance</term>
<term>Axial slices</term>
<term>Bone width</term>
<term>Bony canal</term>
<term>Bony vessel</term>
<term>Canal</term>
<term>Canine region</term>
<term>Catholic university leuven</term>
<term>Clinical periodontology</term>
<term>Computer tomography</term>
<term>Cone beam</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Diameter years</term>
<term>Group years</term>
<term>Impax pacs</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Implants research</term>
<term>Independent samples</term>
<term>International journal</term>
<term>John wiley sons</term>
<term>Lateral</term>
<term>Lateral sinus wall</term>
<term>Lateral wall</term>
<term>Linear regression lines</term>
<term>Maxillary</term>
<term>Maxillary sinus</term>
<term>Maxillofacial implants</term>
<term>Mesial side</term>
<term>Molar</term>
<term>Normal distribution interquartile range</term>
<term>Normality</term>
<term>Occlusal plane</term>
<term>Oral impl</term>
<term>Pacs lightbox</term>
<term>Palatal aspect</term>
<term>Panoramic</term>
<term>Panoramic images</term>
<term>Panoramic radiograph</term>
<term>Panoramic radiographs</term>
<term>Panoramic radiography</term>
<term>Periodontology</term>
<term>Premolar</term>
<term>Premolar area</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Radiograph</term>
<term>Radiographic</term>
<term>Radiographic study</term>
<term>Radiography</term>
<term>Reformatted images</term>
<term>Sinus</term>
<term>Sinus augmentation</term>
<term>Sinus augmentation procedures</term>
<term>Sinus membrane</term>
<term>Standard deviation range test</term>
<term>Systematic review</term>
<term>Temmerman</term>
<term>Tomography</term>
<term>University hospital</term>
<term>Upper premolar region</term>
<term>Vascular structure</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">Objective: The inherent deformation and two‐dimensional nature of panoramic radiographs jeopardise their interpretation and quantitative measurements. This study aims to estimate the degree of underestimation of available mesio‐distal bone in the premolar area (comparing panoramic radiographs with multi‐slice/cone‐beam computer tomography [CT]) to determine the prevalence, width, length and position of the bony canal [artery] in the lateral sinus wall and to explore the prevalence, width and length of another (newly detected) bony canal at the palatal aspect of the upper canine.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName>
<keywords><teeft><json:string>sinus</json:string>
<json:string>radiograph</json:string>
<json:string>panoramic</json:string>
<json:string>maxillary</json:string>
<json:string>bony canal</json:string>
<json:string>premolar</json:string>
<json:string>implant</json:string>
<json:string>panoramic radiographs</json:string>
<json:string>augmentation</json:string>
<json:string>tomography</json:string>
<json:string>group years</json:string>
<json:string>apical</json:string>
<json:string>computer tomography</json:string>
<json:string>radiographic</json:string>
<json:string>temmerman</json:string>
<json:string>periodontology</json:string>
<json:string>panoramic radiograph</json:string>
<json:string>maxillary sinus</json:string>
<json:string>canal</json:string>
<json:string>lateral</json:string>
<json:string>panoramic radiography</json:string>
<json:string>normality</json:string>
<json:string>lateral wall</json:string>
<json:string>panoramic images</json:string>
<json:string>radiography</json:string>
<json:string>molar</json:string>
<json:string>independent samples</json:string>
<json:string>oral impl</json:string>
<json:string>john wiley sons</json:string>
<json:string>systematic review</json:string>
<json:string>palatal aspect</json:string>
<json:string>standard deviation range test</json:string>
<json:string>international journal</json:string>
<json:string>maxillofacial implants</json:string>
<json:string>dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>lateral sinus wall</json:string>
<json:string>present study</json:string>
<json:string>reformatted images</json:string>
<json:string>diameter years</json:string>
<json:string>occlusal plane</json:string>
<json:string>normal distribution interquartile range</json:string>
<json:string>clinical periodontology</json:string>
<json:string>implant placement</json:string>
<json:string>implants research</json:string>
<json:string>mesial side</json:string>
<json:string>pacs lightbox</json:string>
<json:string>impax pacs</json:string>
<json:string>university hospital</json:string>
<json:string>canine region</json:string>
<json:string>bone width</json:string>
<json:string>sinus augmentation</json:string>
<json:string>catholic university leuven</json:string>
<json:string>available bone distance</json:string>
<json:string>linear regression lines</json:string>
<json:string>upper premolar region</json:string>
<json:string>sinus augmentation procedures</json:string>
<json:string>anterior wall</json:string>
<json:string>premolar area</json:string>
<json:string>vascular structure</json:string>
<json:string>bony vessel</json:string>
<json:string>radiographic study</json:string>
<json:string>sinus membrane</json:string>
<json:string>alveolar artery</json:string>
<json:string>cone beam</json:string>
<json:string>available bone</json:string>
<json:string>axial slices</json:string>
</teeft>
</keywords>
<author><json:item><name>Andy Temmerman</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology & Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>Stijn Hertelé</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Department of Mechanical Construction and Production, Faculty of Engineering, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>Wim Teughels</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology & Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>Christel Dekeyser</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology & Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>Reinhilde Jacobs</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Oral Imaging Centre, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology & Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>Marc Quirynen</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology & Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>CT</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>implants</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>maxilla</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>panoramic images</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>sinus augmentation</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
<articleId><json:string>CLR2000</json:string>
</articleId>
<arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-XNKBH19S-3</arkIstex>
<language><json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>Objective: The inherent deformation and two‐dimensional nature of panoramic radiographs jeopardise their interpretation and quantitative measurements. This study aims to estimate the degree of underestimation of available mesio‐distal bone in the premolar area (comparing panoramic radiographs with multi‐slice/cone‐beam computer tomography [CT]) to determine the prevalence, width, length and position of the bony canal [artery] in the lateral sinus wall and to explore the prevalence, width and length of another (newly detected) bony canal at the palatal aspect of the upper canine.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators><score>7.444</score>
<pdfWordCount>4472</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>29008</pdfCharCount>
<pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageCount>6</pdfPageCount>
<pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative>
<abstractWordCount>81</abstractWordCount>
<abstractCharCount>585</abstractCharCount>
<keywordCount>5</keywordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>Are panoramic images reliable in planning sinus augmentation procedures?</title>
<pmid><json:string>20868452</json:string>
</pmid>
<genre><json:string>article</json:string>
</genre>
<host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
<language><json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string>
</doi>
<issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string>
</issn>
<eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string>
</eissn>
<publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string>
</publisherId>
<volume>22</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<pages><first>189</first>
<last>194</last>
<total>6</total>
</pages>
<genre><json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
</host>
<namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2011</json:string>
<json:string>2002</json:string>
</date>
<geogName></geogName>
<orgName><json:string>Stijn Hertele Department of Mechanical Construction and Production</json:string>
<json:string>Ghent University</json:string>
<json:string>Belgium Corresponding</json:string>
<json:string>Department of Periodontology</json:string>
<json:string>University Hospital, Catholic University Leuven</json:string>
<json:string>Leuven Belgium Tel</json:string>
<json:string>Catholic University</json:string>
<json:string>Belgium Reinhilde Jacobs, Oral Imaging Centre, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology</json:string>
<json:string>Andy Temmerman Department of Periodontology School of Dentistry UZ Sint-Rafae</json:string>
</orgName>
<orgName_funder></orgName_funder>
<orgName_provider></orgName_provider>
<persName><json:string>Marc Quirynen</json:string>
<json:string>John Wiley</json:string>
<json:string>Christel Dekeyser</json:string>
<json:string>M. Are</json:string>
<json:string>Andy Temmerman</json:string>
</persName>
<placeName><json:string>Germany</json:string>
<json:string>Finland</json:string>
<json:string>Erlangen</json:string>
<json:string>Japan</json:string>
<json:string>Leuven</json:string>
<json:string>Belgium</json:string>
</placeName>
<ref_url></ref_url>
<ref_bibl><json:string>Traxler et al. 1999</json:string>
<json:string>Mardinger et al. 2007</json:string>
<json:string>Numata 1933</json:string>
<json:string>Tan et al. 2008</json:string>
<json:string>Marx & Garg 2002</json:string>
<json:string>Solar et al. 1999</json:string>
<json:string>Kaimenyi & Ashley 1988</json:string>
<json:string>Paatero 1949</json:string>
<json:string>Elian et al. 2005</json:string>
<json:string>Vazquez et al. (2008)</json:string>
<json:string>Rushton & Horner 1996, 2003</json:string>
<json:string>Emmerich et al. 2005</json:string>
<json:string>Graziani et al. 2004</json:string>
<json:string>Peker et al. 2008</json:string>
<json:string>Ainamo & Tammisalo 1973</json:string>
<json:string>Veyre-Goulet et al. 2008</json:string>
<json:string>Guerrero et al. 2006</json:string>
<json:string>Sharan & Madjar 2008</json:string>
<json:string>Estrela et al. (2008)</json:string>
<json:string>Pjetursson et al. 2008</json:string>
<json:string>Mardinger et al. (2007)</json:string>
<json:string>Temmerman et al</json:string>
<json:string>Kaya et al. 2008</json:string>
<json:string>Lofthag-Hansen et al. 2009</json:string>
<json:string>Mckee et al. 2001</json:string>
<json:string>Akesson et al. 1989</json:string>
<json:string>Yeo et al. 2002</json:string>
<json:string>Traxler et al. (1999)</json:string>
<json:string>Van Assche et al. 2007</json:string>
<json:string>Gijbels et al. 2000</json:string>
<json:string>Angelopoulos et al. 2008</json:string>
<json:string>Harris et al. 2002</json:string>
<json:string>Fabbro et al. 2004, 2008</json:string>
<json:string>Jacobs et al. 2009</json:string>
</ref_bibl>
<bibl></bibl>
</unitex>
</namedEntities>
<ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-XNKBH19S-3</json:string>
</ark>
<categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string>
<json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string>
<json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string>
</wos>
<scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string>
<json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string>
</scienceMetrix>
<scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string>
</scopus>
</categories>
<publicationDate>2011</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2011</copyrightDate>
<doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02000.x</json:string>
</doi>
<id>2239235CADFD97481FAE0E1674F6F25C0809E1CB</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/2239235CADFD97481FAE0E1674F6F25C0809E1CB/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item><extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/2239235CADFD97481FAE0E1674F6F25C0809E1CB/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/2239235CADFD97481FAE0E1674F6F25C0809E1CB/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Are panoramic images reliable in planning sinus augmentation procedures?</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<availability><licence>© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence>
</availability>
<date type="published" when="2011-02"></date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note>
<note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Are panoramic images reliable in planning sinus augmentation procedures?</title>
<title level="a" type="short">Reliability of panoramic images</title>
<author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Andy</forename>
<surname>Temmerman</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology & Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Stijn</forename>
<surname>Hertelé</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Mechanical Construction and Production, Faculty of Engineering, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Wim</forename>
<surname>Teughels</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology & Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Christel</forename>
<surname>Dekeyser</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology & Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Reinhilde</forename>
<surname>Jacobs</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Oral Imaging Centre, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology & Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0005"><persName><forename type="first">Marc</forename>
<surname>Quirynen</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology & Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<idno type="istex">2239235CADFD97481FAE0E1674F6F25C0809E1CB</idno>
<idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-XNKBH19S-3</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02000.x</idno>
<idno type="unit">CLR2000</idno>
<idno type="supplier">2000</idno>
<idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR2000.pdf</idno>
</analytic>
<monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title>
<idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno>
<idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno>
<idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2011.22.issue-2</idno>
<idno type="product">CLR</idno>
<idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">22</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="189">189</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="194">194</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2011-02"></date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head>
<p><hi rend="bold">Objective: </hi>
 The inherent deformation and two‐dimensional nature of panoramic radiographs jeopardise their interpretation and quantitative measurements. This study aims to estimate the degree of underestimation of available mesio‐distal bone in the premolar area (comparing panoramic radiographs with multi‐slice/cone‐beam computer tomography [CT]) to determine the prevalence, width, length and position of the bony canal [artery] in the lateral sinus wall and to explore the prevalence, width and length of another (newly detected) bony canal at the palatal aspect of the upper canine.</p>
<p><hi rend="bold">Material and methods: </hi>
 The distance between the distal side of the canine/first premolar and the mesial side of the first molar or the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus was measured on panoramic radiographs and corresponding multi‐slice/cone‐beam CT images (65 patients). Measurements were made at apical, mid‐radicular and crestal regions, parallel to the occlusal plane. The presence and dimensions of the two above‐mentioned intra‐osseous canals were verified on multi‐slice CT scans (144 patients) using reformatted cross‐sectional images and/or axial slices.</p>
<p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi>
 For all 65 patients, panoramic radiographs underscored the mesio‐distal distance of available bone in the upper premolar region (mean 2.9 mm, range 0.1–7.5 mm). An intra‐osseous canal in the lateral maxillary sinus wall was clearly visible in 49.5% of the cases (mean diameter 1.4 mm). In the canine region, a bony canal was obvious in 32.9% of the cases, with a mean diameter of 1.23 mm. For both canals, there was no correlation between diameter and patient's age.</p>
<p><hi rend="bold">Conclusions: </hi>
 Based on the present data, cone‐beam CT imaging can be recommended for visualising anatomical structures during planning of sinus augmentation procedures.</p>
<p> 
               <hi rend="bold">To cite this article:</hi>
           Temmerman A, Hertelé S, Teughels W, Dekeyser C, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Are panoramic images reliable in planning sinus augmentation procedures? <hi rend="italic">Clin. Oral Impl. Res</hi>
. <hi rend="bold">22</hi>
, 2011; 189 –194. doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02000.x</p>
</abstract>
<textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">CT</term>
<term xml:id="k2">implants</term>
<term xml:id="k3">maxilla</term>
<term xml:id="k4">panoramic images</term>
<term xml:id="k5">sinus augmentation</term>
</keywords>
<keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en"></language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item><extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/2239235CADFD97481FAE0E1674F6F25C0809E1CB/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName>
<publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc>
</publisherInfo>
<doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi>
<issn type="print">0905-7161</issn>
<issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn>
<idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id>
<id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id>
</idGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
</titleGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="part" position="02102"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2011.22.issue-2</doi>
<numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="22">22</numbering>
<numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<coverDate startDate="2011-02">February 2011</coverDate>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="9" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02000.x</doi>
<idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR2000"></id>
<id type="supplier" value="2000"></id>
</idGroup>
<countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="6"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title>
</titleGroup>
<copyright>© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright>
<eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.4.2 mode:FullText" date="2011-01-11"></event>
<event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2010-09-27"></event>
<event type="firstOnline" date="2010-09-27"></event>
<event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2011-01-11"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event>
</eventGroup>
<numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="189">189</numbering>
<numbering type="pageLast" number="194">194</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<correspondenceTo><b>Corresponding author:</b>
 
<i>Andy Temmerman</i>
 Department of Periodontology School of Dentistry UZ Sint‐Rafaël Kapucijnenvoer 33 B‐3000 Leuven Belgium Tel.: +32 16 332483 Fax: +32 16 332412 e‐mail: <email normalForm="andy.temmerman@uz.kuleuven.ac.be">andy.temmerman@uz.kuleuven.ac.be</email>
</correspondenceTo>
<linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR2000.pdf"></link>
</linkGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Date:</b>
 Accepted 29 May 2010</unparsedEditorialHistory>
<countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="4"></count>
<count type="tableTotal" number="5"></count>
<count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count>
<count type="referenceTotal" number="34"></count>
<count type="wordTotal" number="5925"></count>
<count type="linksCrossRef" number="36"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="main">Are panoramic images reliable in planning sinus augmentation procedures?</title>
<title type="shortAuthors">Temmerman et al.</title>
<title type="short">Reliability of panoramic images</title>
</titleGroup>
<creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Andy</givenNames>
<familyName>Temmerman</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Stijn</givenNames>
<familyName>Hertelé</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Wim</givenNames>
<familyName>Teughels</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Christel</givenNames>
<familyName>Dekeyser</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Reinhilde</givenNames>
<familyName>Jacobs</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr6" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Marc</givenNames>
<familyName>Quirynen</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
</creators>
<affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology & Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Mechanical Construction and Production, Faculty of Engineering, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Oral Imaging Centre, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology & Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
</affiliationGroup>
<keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">CT</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k2">implants</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k3">maxilla</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k4">panoramic images</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k5">sinus augmentation</keyword>
</keywordGroup>
<abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title>
<p><b>Objective: </b>
 The inherent deformation and two‐dimensional nature of panoramic radiographs jeopardise their interpretation and quantitative measurements. This study aims to estimate the degree of underestimation of available mesio‐distal bone in the premolar area (comparing panoramic radiographs with multi‐slice/cone‐beam computer tomography [CT]) to determine the prevalence, width, length and position of the bony canal [artery] in the lateral sinus wall and to explore the prevalence, width and length of another (newly detected) bony canal at the palatal aspect of the upper canine.</p>
<p><b>Material and methods: </b>
 The distance between the distal side of the canine/first premolar and the mesial side of the first molar or the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus was measured on panoramic radiographs and corresponding multi‐slice/cone‐beam CT images (65 patients). Measurements were made at apical, mid‐radicular and crestal regions, parallel to the occlusal plane. The presence and dimensions of the two above‐mentioned intra‐osseous canals were verified on multi‐slice CT scans (144 patients) using reformatted cross‐sectional images and/or axial slices.</p>
<p><b>Results: </b>
 For all 65 patients, panoramic radiographs underscored the mesio‐distal distance of available bone in the upper premolar region (mean 2.9 mm, range 0.1–7.5 mm). An intra‐osseous canal in the lateral maxillary sinus wall was clearly visible in 49.5% of the cases (mean diameter 1.4 mm). In the canine region, a bony canal was obvious in 32.9% of the cases, with a mean diameter of 1.23 mm. For both canals, there was no correlation between diameter and patient's age.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions: </b>
 Based on the present data, cone‐beam CT imaging can be recommended for visualising anatomical structures during planning of sinus augmentation procedures.</p>
<p> <b>To cite this article:</b>
           Temmerman A, Hertelé S, Teughels W, Dekeyser C, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Are panoramic images reliable in planning sinus augmentation procedures? <i>Clin. Oral Impl. Res</i>
. <b>22</b>
, 2011; 189 –194. doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02000.x</p>
</abstract>
</abstractGroup>
</contentMeta>
</header>
</component>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Are panoramic images reliable in planning sinus augmentation procedures?</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Reliability of panoramic images</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Are panoramic images reliable in planning sinus augmentation procedures?</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Andy</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Temmerman</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology & Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Stijn</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Hertelé</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Mechanical Construction and Production, Faculty of Engineering, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Wim</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Teughels</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology & Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Christel</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Dekeyser</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology & Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Reinhilde</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Jacobs</namePart>
<affiliation>Oral Imaging Centre, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology & Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Marc</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Quirynen</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology & Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre>
<originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2011-02</dateIssued>
<edition>Date: Accepted 29 May 2010</edition>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">4</extent>
<extent unit="tables">5</extent>
<extent unit="formulas">0</extent>
<extent unit="references">34</extent>
<extent unit="linksCrossRef">36</extent>
<extent unit="words">5925</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract>Objective: The inherent deformation and two‐dimensional nature of panoramic radiographs jeopardise their interpretation and quantitative measurements. This study aims to estimate the degree of underestimation of available mesio‐distal bone in the premolar area (comparing panoramic radiographs with multi‐slice/cone‐beam computer tomography [CT]) to determine the prevalence, width, length and position of the bony canal [artery] in the lateral sinus wall and to explore the prevalence, width and length of another (newly detected) bony canal at the palatal aspect of the upper canine.</abstract>
<abstract>Material and methods: The distance between the distal side of the canine/first premolar and the mesial side of the first molar or the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus was measured on panoramic radiographs and corresponding multi‐slice/cone‐beam CT images (65 patients). Measurements were made at apical, mid‐radicular and crestal regions, parallel to the occlusal plane. The presence and dimensions of the two above‐mentioned intra‐osseous canals were verified on multi‐slice CT scans (144 patients) using reformatted cross‐sectional images and/or axial slices.</abstract>
<abstract>Results: For all 65 patients, panoramic radiographs underscored the mesio‐distal distance of available bone in the upper premolar region (mean 2.9 mm, range 0.1–7.5 mm). An intra‐osseous canal in the lateral maxillary sinus wall was clearly visible in 49.5% of the cases (mean diameter 1.4 mm). In the canine region, a bony canal was obvious in 32.9% of the cases, with a mean diameter of 1.23 mm. For both canals, there was no correlation between diameter and patient's age.</abstract>
<abstract>Conclusions: Based on the present data, cone‐beam CT imaging can be recommended for visualising anatomical structures during planning of sinus augmentation procedures.</abstract>
<abstract>To cite this article:  Temmerman A, Hertelé S, Teughels W, Dekeyser C, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Are panoramic images reliable in planning sinus augmentation procedures? Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 189 –194. doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02000.x</abstract>
<subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre>
<topic>CT</topic>
<topic>implants</topic>
<topic>maxilla</topic>
<topic>panoramic images</topic>
<topic>sinus augmentation</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre>
<identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier>
<part><date>2011</date>
<detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption>
<number>22</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption>
<number>2</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages"><start>189</start>
<end>194</end>
<total>6</total>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">2239235CADFD97481FAE0E1674F6F25C0809E1CB</identifier>
<identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-XNKBH19S-3</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02000.x</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">CLR2000</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition>
<recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
<json:item><extension>json</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/json</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/2239235CADFD97481FAE0E1674F6F25C0809E1CB/metadata/json</uri>
</json:item>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001084 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001084 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:2239235CADFD97481FAE0E1674F6F25C0809E1CB
   |texte=   Are panoramic images reliable in planning sinus augmentation procedures?
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Are panoramic images reliable in planning sinus augmentation procedures?

Are panoramic images reliable in planning sinus augmentation procedures?

Source :

English descriptors

Abstract

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri