Multicentre prospective evaluation of implant–assisted mandibular bilateral distal extension removable partial dentures: Patient satisfaction
Identifieur interne : 000F78 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000F77; suivant : 000F79Multicentre prospective evaluation of implant–assisted mandibular bilateral distal extension removable partial dentures: Patient satisfaction
Auteurs : Daniel Wismeijer ; Andrew Tawse-Smith ; Alan G. T. PayneSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2013-01.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Analogue, Ball abutments, Brudvick, Centre, Clin, Colombia, Complete maxillary dentures, Control group, Conventional mandibular, Dental arches, Dentistry, Denture, Distal extension, Distal implants, Gold matrices, Healing caps, Impl, Implant, Implant support, International journal, John wiley sons wismeijer, Kennedy class, Major connectors, Mandibular, Matrix, Maxillary, Ohip, Ohiq, Oral function, Oral impl, Oral rehabilitation, Osaba king, Overall satisfaction, Partial denture, Partial dentures, Participant, Patient satisfaction, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthodontics, Referenced approach, Removable, Residual ridge resorption, Restorative dentistry, Retentive, Retentive anchors, Retrospective, Retrospective study, Speech appearance, Test group participants, Test groups, Total scores, Visual analogue scale, Walton macentee, Wismeijer, Zealand.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Analogue, Ball abutments, Brudvick, Centre, Clin, Colombia, Complete maxillary dentures, Control group, Conventional mandibular, Dental arches, Dentistry, Denture, Distal extension, Distal implants, Gold matrices, Healing caps, Impl, Implant, Implant support, International journal, John wiley sons wismeijer, Kennedy class, Major connectors, Mandibular, Matrix, Maxillary, Ohip, Ohiq, Oral function, Oral impl, Oral rehabilitation, Osaba king, Overall satisfaction, Partial denture, Partial dentures, Participant, Patient satisfaction, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthodontics, Referenced approach, Removable, Residual ridge resorption, Restorative dentistry, Retentive, Retentive anchors, Retrospective, Retrospective study, Speech appearance, Test group participants, Test groups, Total scores, Visual analogue scale, Walton macentee, Wismeijer, Zealand.
Abstract
To compare the levels of patient satisfaction with either conventional mandibular bilateral distal extension partial dentures or those assisted by bilateral distal implants.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02367.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:1FD8C09A1F3081A785AF1700A2D356AFE9BD03CFLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Multicentre prospective evaluation of implant–assisted mandibular bilateral distal extension removable partial dentures: Patient satisfaction</title><author><name sortKey="Wismeijer, Daniel" sort="Wismeijer, Daniel" uniqKey="Wismeijer D" first="Daniel" last="Wismeijer">Daniel Wismeijer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Function and Restorative Dentistry, Section of Oral Implantology and Prosthetic Dentistry, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Tawse Mith, Andrew" sort="Tawse Mith, Andrew" uniqKey="Tawse Mith A" first="Andrew" last="Tawse-Smith">Andrew Tawse-Smith</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral Implant Research, Colegio Odontologico , Institucion Universitaria Colegios de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral Implantology Research Group, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Payne, Alan G T" sort="Payne, Alan G T" uniqKey="Payne A" first="Alan G. T." last="Payne">Alan G. T. Payne</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private Practice, Whangarei, New Zealand</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private PracticeWhangareiNew ZealandTel.: 64 9 4387694Fax: 64 9 4300083e‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: payne@actrix.gen.nz</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:1FD8C09A1F3081A785AF1700A2D356AFE9BD03CF</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02367.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/1FD8C09A1F3081A785AF1700A2D356AFE9BD03CF/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000F78</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000F78</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Multicentre prospective evaluation of implant–assisted mandibular bilateral distal extension removable partial dentures: Patient satisfaction</title><author><name sortKey="Wismeijer, Daniel" sort="Wismeijer, Daniel" uniqKey="Wismeijer D" first="Daniel" last="Wismeijer">Daniel Wismeijer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Function and Restorative Dentistry, Section of Oral Implantology and Prosthetic Dentistry, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Tawse Mith, Andrew" sort="Tawse Mith, Andrew" uniqKey="Tawse Mith A" first="Andrew" last="Tawse-Smith">Andrew Tawse-Smith</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral Implant Research, Colegio Odontologico , Institucion Universitaria Colegios de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral Implantology Research Group, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Payne, Alan G T" sort="Payne, Alan G T" uniqKey="Payne A" first="Alan G. T." last="Payne">Alan G. T. Payne</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private Practice, Whangarei, New Zealand</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private PracticeWhangareiNew ZealandTel.: 64 9 4387694Fax: 64 9 4300083e‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: payne@actrix.gen.nz</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">24</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="20">20</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="27">27</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><date type="published" when="2013-01">2013-01</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Analogue</term><term>Ball abutments</term><term>Brudvick</term><term>Centre</term><term>Clin</term><term>Colombia</term><term>Complete maxillary dentures</term><term>Control group</term><term>Conventional mandibular</term><term>Dental arches</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Distal extension</term><term>Distal implants</term><term>Gold matrices</term><term>Healing caps</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant support</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons wismeijer</term><term>Kennedy class</term><term>Major connectors</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Matrix</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Ohip</term><term>Ohiq</term><term>Oral function</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Osaba king</term><term>Overall satisfaction</term><term>Partial denture</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Participant</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Prosthodontics</term><term>Referenced approach</term><term>Removable</term><term>Residual ridge resorption</term><term>Restorative dentistry</term><term>Retentive</term><term>Retentive anchors</term><term>Retrospective</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Speech appearance</term><term>Test group participants</term><term>Test groups</term><term>Total scores</term><term>Visual analogue scale</term><term>Walton macentee</term><term>Wismeijer</term><term>Zealand</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Analogue</term><term>Ball abutments</term><term>Brudvick</term><term>Centre</term><term>Clin</term><term>Colombia</term><term>Complete maxillary dentures</term><term>Control group</term><term>Conventional mandibular</term><term>Dental arches</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Distal extension</term><term>Distal implants</term><term>Gold matrices</term><term>Healing caps</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant support</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons wismeijer</term><term>Kennedy class</term><term>Major connectors</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Matrix</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Ohip</term><term>Ohiq</term><term>Oral function</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Osaba king</term><term>Overall satisfaction</term><term>Partial denture</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Participant</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Prosthodontics</term><term>Referenced approach</term><term>Removable</term><term>Residual ridge resorption</term><term>Restorative dentistry</term><term>Retentive</term><term>Retentive anchors</term><term>Retrospective</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Speech appearance</term><term>Test group participants</term><term>Test groups</term><term>Total scores</term><term>Visual analogue scale</term><term>Walton macentee</term><term>Wismeijer</term><term>Zealand</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">To compare the levels of patient satisfaction with either conventional mandibular bilateral distal extension partial dentures or those assisted by bilateral distal implants.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>partial dentures</json:string><json:string>maxillary</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>healing caps</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>ohip</json:string><json:string>ohiq</json:string><json:string>distal extension</json:string><json:string>retentive anchors</json:string><json:string>conventional mandibular</json:string><json:string>wismeijer</json:string><json:string>overall satisfaction</json:string><json:string>removable</json:string><json:string>colombia</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>test groups</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>impl</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>total scores</json:string><json:string>prosthodontics</json:string><json:string>complete maxillary dentures</json:string><json:string>patient satisfaction</json:string><json:string>brudvick</json:string><json:string>gold matrices</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>ball abutments</json:string><json:string>oral rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>distal implants</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>test group participants</json:string><json:string>participant</json:string><json:string>visual analogue scale</json:string><json:string>oral function</json:string><json:string>speech appearance</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons wismeijer</json:string><json:string>dental arches</json:string><json:string>control group</json:string><json:string>matrix</json:string><json:string>zealand</json:string><json:string>analogue</json:string><json:string>retrospective</json:string><json:string>walton macentee</json:string><json:string>retrospective study</json:string><json:string>major connectors</json:string><json:string>osaba king</json:string><json:string>kennedy class</json:string><json:string>restorative dentistry</json:string><json:string>residual ridge resorption</json:string><json:string>implant support</json:string><json:string>referenced approach</json:string><json:string>partial denture</json:string><json:string>retentive</json:string><json:string>centre</json:string><json:string>netherlands</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Daniel Wismeijer</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral Function and Restorative Dentistry, Section of Oral Implantology and Prosthetic Dentistry, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Andrew Tawse‐Smith</name><affiliations><json:string>Oral Implant Research, Colegio Odontologico , Institucion Universitaria Colegios de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia</json:string><json:string>Oral Implantology Research Group, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Alan G. T. Payne</name><affiliations><json:string>Private Practice, Whangarei, New Zealand</json:string><json:string>Private PracticeWhangareiNew ZealandTel.: 64 9 4387694Fax: 64 9 4300083e‐mail:</json:string><json:string>E-mail: payne@actrix.gen.nz</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>partial dentures</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>patient satisfaction</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR2367</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-P5QSSZ2C-Z</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>To compare the levels of patient satisfaction with either conventional mandibular bilateral distal extension partial dentures or those assisted by bilateral distal implants.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.276</score><pdfWordCount>5221</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>36355</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>23</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>173</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>3</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Multicentre prospective evaluation of implant–assisted mandibular bilateral distal extension removable partial dentures: Patient satisfaction</title><pmid><json:string>22111809</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>20</first><last>27</last><total>8</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Original Article</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2011-10-15</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Netherlands and Maurice Post and Mr</json:string><json:string>Amphia Teaching Hospital, Breda, Netherlands, the Colegio Odontologico, Bogota, Colombia</json:string><json:string>Colombia, Bogota, Colombia Oral Implantology Research Group, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand Alan G</json:string><json:string>American College of Prosthodontics</json:string><json:string>Payne Private Practice Whangarei New Zealand Tel</json:string><json:string>New Zealand, Colombia</json:string><json:string>Finally Institute Straumann, Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Netherlands, Colombia and New Zealand</json:string><json:string>Montoya Colombia, Associate Professor Rohana De Silva</json:string><json:string>New Zealand and Colombia T</json:string><json:string>ACTA</json:string><json:string>New Zealand and Colombia</json:string><json:string>University of Otago</json:string><json:string>Research Foundation</json:string><json:string>University of British Columbia</json:string><json:string>Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam</json:string><json:string>American College of Prosthodontists</json:string><json:string>New Zealand Key</json:string><json:string>Canada and Professor Jocelyne Feine</json:string><json:string>Netherlands Andrew Tawse-Smith, Oral Implant Research, Colegio Odontologico , Institucion Universitaria Colegios</json:string><json:string>ACTA, Netherlands</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral Function and Restorative Dentistry</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>T. Payne</json:string><json:string>G. T. Payne</json:string><json:string>Kennedy Class</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Daniel Wismeijer</json:string><json:string>Carlos Fonseca</json:string><json:string>Dusan Kuzmanovic</json:string><json:string>Sunyoung Ma</json:string><json:string>Von Fraunhofer</json:string><json:string>Joanne Walton</json:string><json:string>Ian van Staden</json:string><json:string>Alan</json:string><json:string>Jan Herman</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>New New</json:string><json:string>Colombia</json:string><json:string>Montreal</json:string><json:string>Dunedin</json:string><json:string>Canada</json:string><json:string>Breda</json:string><json:string>Vancouver</json:string><json:string>New Zealand</json:string><json:string>Bogota</json:string><json:string>Netherlands</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Palmqvist et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Witter 1989</json:string><json:string>Muller et al. 2001</json:string><json:string>DeBoever & Adriaens 1983</json:string><json:string>Kotkin 1985</json:string><json:string>Wismeijer et al</json:string><json:string>Osaba & King 2004</json:string><json:string>Menard 1991</json:string><json:string>Saunders et al. 1979</json:string><json:string>Verri 2007</json:string><json:string>Sylvester 1981</json:string><json:string>Sarita 2003</json:string><json:string>Witter 2007</json:string><json:string>Naert 1991</json:string><json:string>Kelly 1972</json:string><json:string>McGarry et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Cronbach & Furby 1970</json:string><json:string>Kapur et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Ichikawa et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Maeda 2005</json:string><json:string>Lekholm & Zarb 1985</json:string><json:string>Phoenix et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Cawood & Howell 1988</json:string><json:string>Tallents et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Carr & Brown 2010</json:string><json:string>Feine et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Keltjens et al. 1993</json:string><json:string>Slade & Spencer 1994</json:string><json:string>Bortolini et al. 2011</json:string><json:string>Devlin & Ferguson 1991</json:string><json:string>Locker 1998</json:string><json:string>Kreisler et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Mijiritski 2005; Grossman 2008, 2009</json:string><json:string>Brudvick 1999</json:string><json:string>Cranin 1970</json:string><json:string>Halterman et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Esposito et al. 2001</json:string><json:string>Walton & MacEntee 1994</json:string><json:string>Osaba et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Frank et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Picton 1978</json:string><json:string>Atwood 1962, 1971</json:string><json:string>Jepson 1995</json:string><json:string>van Waas 1994</json:string><json:string>Wetherell 1980</json:string><json:string>Shahmiri & Atieh 2010</json:string><json:string>Schneid & Mattie 2008</json:string><json:string>Ohkubo et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Linkow 1970</json:string><json:string>Ziebland 1994</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-P5QSSZ2C-Z</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2013</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2013</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02367.x</json:string></doi><id>1FD8C09A1F3081A785AF1700A2D356AFE9BD03CF</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/1FD8C09A1F3081A785AF1700A2D356AFE9BD03CF/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/1FD8C09A1F3081A785AF1700A2D356AFE9BD03CF/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/1FD8C09A1F3081A785AF1700A2D356AFE9BD03CF/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Multicentre prospective evaluation of implant–assisted mandibular bilateral distal extension removable partial dentures: Patient satisfaction</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Wiley Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><licence>© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2013-01"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Multicentre prospective evaluation of implant–assisted mandibular bilateral distal extension removable partial dentures: Patient satisfaction</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Daniel</forename><surname>Wismeijer</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Oral Function and Restorative Dentistry</orgName><orgName>Section of Oral Implantology and Prosthetic Dentistry</orgName><orgName>Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA)</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Amsterdam</settlement><country key="NL">The Netherlands</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Andrew</forename><surname>Tawse‐Smith</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Oral Implant Research</orgName><orgName>Colegio Odontologico , Institucion Universitaria Colegios de Colombia</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Bogota</settlement><country key="CO">Colombia</country></address></affiliation><affiliation><orgName>Oral Implantology Research Group</orgName><orgName>Sir John Walsh Research Institute</orgName><orgName>School of Dentistry</orgName><orgName>University of Otago</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Dunedin</settlement><country key="NZ">New Zealand</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Alan G. T.</forename><surname>Payne</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Private Practice</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Whangarei</settlement><country key="NZ">New Zealand</country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Corresponding author: Dr Alan G. T. Payne Private Practice Whangarei New Zealand Tel.: 64 9 4387694 Fax: 64 9 4300083 e‐mail: payne@actrix.gen.nz</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">1FD8C09A1F3081A785AF1700A2D356AFE9BD03CF</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-P5QSSZ2C-Z</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02367.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR2367</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR2367.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2012.24.issue-1</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">24</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="20">20</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="27">27</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><date type="published" when="2013-01"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main" xml:id="clr2367-abs-0001"><head>Abstract</head>
Objective
<p>To compare the levels of patient satisfaction with either conventional mandibular bilateral distal extension partial dentures or those assisted by bilateral distal implants.</p>
Materials and methods
<p>Forty‐eight participants who were dissatisfied with their existing conventional mandibular distal extension dentures opposing complete maxillary dentures were selected for a multicentre prospective study in New Zealand, Colombia and the Netherlands. A control group of 12 participants in New Zealand received conventional mandibular partial dentures. Three test groups involving 36 participants in New Zealand (12), Colombia (12) and the Netherlands (12) received bilateral distal implants in the second molar regions. After conventional loading, the test group participants initially had healing caps placed on the distal implants providing support only, followed after approximately 6 months by ball abutments (retentive anchors) for support and retention. Patient outcomes were determined with questionnaires completed at specific stages of the study for up to 3 years.</p>
Results
<p>Visual analogue scale, Likert and oral health impact questionnaires before and after treatment indicated improved results. There were significantly improved parameters of overall satisfaction, stability, chewing and appearance after 3 years (<hi rend="italic">P</hi> < 0.05). There were also improvements on stability, chewing and overall satisfaction. Speech also improved, but not significantly. Ball abutments (retentive anchors) on the distal implants, as opposed to healing caps improved patient satisfaction for stability, chewing and overall satisfaction. Changing to ball abutments (retentive anchors) revealed significant improvement by participant response when evaluating parameters of stability, chewing and overall satisfaction (<hi rend="italic">P</hi> < 0.05).</p>
Conclusion
<p>Mandibular implant‐assisted removable partial dentures are a preferable treatment option for patients with complaints about their conventional distal extension partial dentures.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords><term xml:id="clr2367-kwd-0001">implant</term><term xml:id="clr2367-kwd-0002">partial dentures</term><term xml:id="clr2367-kwd-0003">patient satisfaction</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Original Article</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/1FD8C09A1F3081A785AF1700A2D356AFE9BD03CF/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:id="clr2367" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title type="short">Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="10"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2012.24.issue-1</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="24">24</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2013-01">January 2013</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="40" status="forIssue" type="article"><doi>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02367.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR2367"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count number="8" type="pageTotal"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Original Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event date="2011-10-02" type="manuscriptAccepted"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2011-10-15" type="xmlCreated"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2011-11-24"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-11-24"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-12-24"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-02"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">20</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">27</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><lineatedText><line><b>Corresponding author:</b></line><line><i>Dr Alan G. T. Payne</i></line><line>Private Practice</line><line>Whangarei</line><line>New Zealand</line><line>Tel.: 64 9 4387694</line><line>Fax: 64 9 4300083</line><line>e‐mail: <email>payne@actrix.gen.nz</email></line></lineatedText></correspondenceTo><selfCitationGroup><citation type="self" xml:id="clr2367-cit-0500">Wismeijer, D., Tawse_Smith, A. & Payne, A.G.T. (2013). Multicentre prospective evaluation of implant–assisted mandibular bilateral distal extension removable partial dentures: Patient satisfaction. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 24(1), 20–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02367.x</citation></selfCitationGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR2367.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">Multicentre prospective evaluation of implant–assisted mandibular bilateral distal extension removable partial dentures: Patient satisfaction</title><title type="shortAuthors">Wismeijer et al</title></titleGroup><creators><creator affiliationRef="#clr2367-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2367-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>Daniel</givenNames> <familyName>Wismeijer</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr2367-aff-0002 #clr2367-aff-0003" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2367-cr-0002"><personName><givenNames>Andrew</givenNames> <familyName>Tawse‐Smith</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr2367-aff-0004" corresponding="yes" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2367-cr-0003"><personName><givenNames>Alan G. T.</givenNames> <familyName>Payne</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation countryCode="NL" type="organization" xml:id="clr2367-aff-0001"><orgDiv>Department of Oral Function and Restorative Dentistry</orgDiv> <orgDiv>Section of Oral Implantology and Prosthetic Dentistry</orgDiv> <orgName>Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA)</orgName> <address><city>Amsterdam</city> <country>The Netherlands</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="CO" type="organization" xml:id="clr2367-aff-0002"><orgDiv>Oral Implant Research</orgDiv> <orgName>Colegio Odontologico , Institucion Universitaria Colegios de Colombia</orgName> <address><city>Bogota</city> <country>Colombia</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="NZ" type="organization" xml:id="clr2367-aff-0003"><orgDiv>Oral Implantology Research Group</orgDiv> <orgName>Sir John Walsh Research Institute</orgName> <orgName>School of Dentistry</orgName> <orgName>University of Otago</orgName> <address><city>Dunedin</city> <country>New Zealand</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="NZ" type="organization" xml:id="clr2367-aff-0004"><orgName>Private Practice</orgName> <address><city>Whangarei</city> <country>New Zealand</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="clr2367-kwd-0001">implant</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2367-kwd-0002">partial dentures</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2367-kwd-0003">patient satisfaction</keyword></keywordGroup><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>Institute Straumann, Switzerland</fundingAgency></fundingInfo><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>International Team for Implantology (ITI) Research Foundation</fundingAgency><fundingNumber>248/2002 RCL</fundingNumber></fundingInfo><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:id="clr2367-abs-0001" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><section xml:id="clr2367-sec-0001"><title type="main">Objective</title><p>To compare the levels of patient satisfaction with either conventional mandibular bilateral distal extension partial dentures or those assisted by bilateral distal implants.</p></section><section xml:id="clr2367-sec-0002"><title type="main">Materials and methods</title><p>Forty‐eight participants who were dissatisfied with their existing conventional mandibular distal extension dentures opposing complete maxillary dentures were selected for a multicentre prospective study in New Zealand, Colombia and the Netherlands. A control group of 12 participants in New Zealand received conventional mandibular partial dentures. Three test groups involving 36 participants in New Zealand (12), Colombia (12) and the Netherlands (12) received bilateral distal implants in the second molar regions. After conventional loading, the test group participants initially had healing caps placed on the distal implants providing support only, followed after approximately 6 months by ball abutments (retentive anchors) for support and retention. Patient outcomes were determined with questionnaires completed at specific stages of the study for up to 3 years.</p></section><section xml:id="clr2367-sec-0003"><title type="main">Results</title><p>Visual analogue scale, Likert and oral health impact questionnaires before and after treatment indicated improved results. There were significantly improved parameters of overall satisfaction, stability, chewing and appearance after 3 years (<i>P</i> < 0.05). There were also improvements on stability, chewing and overall satisfaction. Speech also improved, but not significantly. Ball abutments (retentive anchors) on the distal implants, as opposed to healing caps improved patient satisfaction for stability, chewing and overall satisfaction. Changing to ball abutments (retentive anchors) revealed significant improvement by participant response when evaluating parameters of stability, chewing and overall satisfaction (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p></section><section xml:id="clr2367-sec-0004"><title type="main">Conclusion</title><p>Mandibular implant‐assisted removable partial dentures are a preferable treatment option for patients with complaints about their conventional distal extension partial dentures.</p></section></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Multicentre prospective evaluation of implant–assisted mandibular bilateral distal extension removable partial dentures: Patient satisfaction</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Multicentre prospective evaluation of implant–assisted mandibular bilateral distal extension removable partial dentures: Patient satisfaction</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Daniel</namePart><namePart type="family">Wismeijer</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral Function and Restorative Dentistry, Section of Oral Implantology and Prosthetic Dentistry, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Andrew</namePart><namePart type="family">Tawse‐Smith</namePart><affiliation>Oral Implant Research, Colegio Odontologico , Institucion Universitaria Colegios de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia</affiliation><affiliation>Oral Implantology Research Group, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Alan G. T.</namePart><namePart type="family">Payne</namePart><affiliation>Private Practice, Whangarei, New Zealand</affiliation><affiliation>Private PracticeWhangareiNew ZealandTel.: 64 9 4387694Fax: 64 9 4300083e‐mail:</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: payne@actrix.gen.nz</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2013-01</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2011-10-15</dateCreated><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2011-10-02</dateValid><edition>Wismeijer, D., Tawse_Smith, A. & Payne, A.G.T. (2013). Multicentre prospective evaluation of implant–assisted mandibular bilateral distal extension removable partial dentures: Patient satisfaction. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 24(1), 20–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02367.x</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2013</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract>To compare the levels of patient satisfaction with either conventional mandibular bilateral distal extension partial dentures or those assisted by bilateral distal implants.</abstract><abstract>Forty‐eight participants who were dissatisfied with their existing conventional mandibular distal extension dentures opposing complete maxillary dentures were selected for a multicentre prospective study in New Zealand, Colombia and the Netherlands. A control group of 12 participants in New Zealand received conventional mandibular partial dentures. Three test groups involving 36 participants in New Zealand (12), Colombia (12) and the Netherlands (12) received bilateral distal implants in the second molar regions. After conventional loading, the test group participants initially had healing caps placed on the distal implants providing support only, followed after approximately 6 months by ball abutments (retentive anchors) for support and retention. Patient outcomes were determined with questionnaires completed at specific stages of the study for up to 3 years.</abstract><abstract>Visual analogue scale, Likert and oral health impact questionnaires before and after treatment indicated improved results. There were significantly improved parameters of overall satisfaction, stability, chewing and appearance after 3 years (P < 0.05). There were also improvements on stability, chewing and overall satisfaction. Speech also improved, but not significantly. Ball abutments (retentive anchors) on the distal implants, as opposed to healing caps improved patient satisfaction for stability, chewing and overall satisfaction. Changing to ball abutments (retentive anchors) revealed significant improvement by participant response when evaluating parameters of stability, chewing and overall satisfaction (P < 0.05).</abstract><abstract>Mandibular implant‐assisted removable partial dentures are a preferable treatment option for patients with complaints about their conventional distal extension partial dentures.</abstract><note type="funding">Institute Straumann, Switzerland</note><note type="funding">International Team for Implantology (ITI) Research Foundation - No. 248/2002 RCL; </note><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>implant</topic><topic>partial dentures</topic><topic>patient satisfaction</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Original Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2013</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>24</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>20</start><end>27</end><total>8</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">1FD8C09A1F3081A785AF1700A2D356AFE9BD03CF</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-P5QSSZ2C-Z</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02367.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR2367</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/1FD8C09A1F3081A785AF1700A2D356AFE9BD03CF/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000F78 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000F78 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:1FD8C09A1F3081A785AF1700A2D356AFE9BD03CF
|texte= Multicentre prospective evaluation of implant–assisted mandibular bilateral distal extension removable partial dentures: Patient satisfaction
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |