A biometric comparison of face shape with denture tooth form
Identifieur interne : 000E02 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000E01; suivant : 000E03A biometric comparison of face shape with denture tooth form
Auteurs : L. W. Seluk ; R. H. W. Brodbelt ; G. F. WalkerSource :
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 1987-03.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Actual denture teeth, Aesthetics, Anterior teeth, Artificial teeth, Brodbelt, Cervical widths, Chamberlain, Chamberlain robinson, Colour, Dentistry, Dentogenic concept, Denture, Denture aesthetics, Denture form, Denture patients, Denture teeth, Denture tooth moulds, Digitized, Edentulous subjects, Face shape, Face shapes, Facial, Facial form, Frush, Gingival, Gingival contour, Gonial widths, Incisor, Inverted tooth form, Lower segment, Marunick, Mould, Oral rehabilitation, Ovoid, Ovoid teeth, Patient preference, Patient preferences, Portrait photographs, Previous paper, Profile mirror system, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Replacement teeth, Seluk, Significant difference, Tooth form, Tooth forms, Tooth moulds, Tooth shape, Trubyte bioform system, Typal, Unset, Unset denture teeth, Upper halves, Upper segment.
- Teeft :
- Actual denture teeth, Aesthetics, Anterior teeth, Artificial teeth, Brodbelt, Cervical widths, Chamberlain, Chamberlain robinson, Colour, Dentistry, Dentogenic concept, Denture, Denture aesthetics, Denture form, Denture patients, Denture teeth, Denture tooth moulds, Digitized, Edentulous subjects, Face shape, Face shapes, Facial, Facial form, Frush, Gingival, Gingival contour, Gonial widths, Incisor, Inverted tooth form, Lower segment, Marunick, Mould, Oral rehabilitation, Ovoid, Ovoid teeth, Patient preference, Patient preferences, Portrait photographs, Previous paper, Profile mirror system, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Replacement teeth, Seluk, Significant difference, Tooth form, Tooth forms, Tooth moulds, Tooth shape, Trubyte bioform system, Typal, Unset, Unset denture teeth, Upper halves, Upper segment.
Abstract
Dentist and patient preferences are often used to select replacement teeth in prosthodontics. Face shape compared with inverted tooth form classifications based on Leon Williams's work are currently used. Shapes of teeth and faces have been referred to as square, ovoid or tapered, or some combination of these. Six patients, three male and three female, were selected as being classically square, tapered or ovoid in facial form. Three sets of dentures had been made for each patient with tapering, ovoid and square denture teeth. Using a standardized photographic technique, full face views with profiles and close‐ups of the teeth were taken. Then from standardized enlarged tracings, key anatomic and derived points were marked, digitized and computer analysed. The face shapes and inverted tooth forms were digitized in the same manner. A comparison of tooth moulds versus the actual denture teeth shows a highly significant difference (P<0.001) between set and unset denture teeth. There is also a significant difference (P<0.001) between facial form and denture teeth using temporal zygomatic and gonial widths for faces, compared with incisal, contact, and cervical widths for the teeth.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1987.tb00703.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:1C40CDAC4FC6EC097F78AFBAC4274B6EF60A2E36Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A biometric comparison of face shape with denture tooth form</title><author><name sortKey="Seluk, L W" sort="Seluk, L W" uniqKey="Seluk L" first="L. W." last="Seluk">L. W. Seluk</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Michigan School of Dentistry</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence address: Dr L. W. Seluk, Department of Partial Denture Prosthodontics, The University of Michigan, School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109‐1078, USA.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Brodbelt, R H W" sort="Brodbelt, R H W" uniqKey="Brodbelt R" first="R. H. W." last="Brodbelt">R. H. W. Brodbelt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Michigan School of Dentistry</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Walker, G F" sort="Walker, G F" uniqKey="Walker G" first="G. F." last="Walker">G. F. Walker</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Michigan School of Dentistry</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:1C40CDAC4FC6EC097F78AFBAC4274B6EF60A2E36</idno><date when="1987" year="1987">1987</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.1987.tb00703.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/1C40CDAC4FC6EC097F78AFBAC4274B6EF60A2E36/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000E02</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000E02</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A biometric comparison of face shape with denture tooth form</title><author><name sortKey="Seluk, L W" sort="Seluk, L W" uniqKey="Seluk L" first="L. W." last="Seluk">L. W. Seluk</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Michigan School of Dentistry</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence address: Dr L. W. Seluk, Department of Partial Denture Prosthodontics, The University of Michigan, School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109‐1078, USA.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Brodbelt, R H W" sort="Brodbelt, R H W" uniqKey="Brodbelt R" first="R. H. W." last="Brodbelt">R. H. W. Brodbelt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Michigan School of Dentistry</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Walker, G F" sort="Walker, G F" uniqKey="Walker G" first="G. F." last="Walker">G. F. Walker</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Michigan School of Dentistry</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="139">139</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="145">145</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1987-03">1987-03</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Actual denture teeth</term><term>Aesthetics</term><term>Anterior teeth</term><term>Artificial teeth</term><term>Brodbelt</term><term>Cervical widths</term><term>Chamberlain</term><term>Chamberlain robinson</term><term>Colour</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Dentogenic concept</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture aesthetics</term><term>Denture form</term><term>Denture patients</term><term>Denture teeth</term><term>Denture tooth moulds</term><term>Digitized</term><term>Edentulous subjects</term><term>Face shape</term><term>Face shapes</term><term>Facial</term><term>Facial form</term><term>Frush</term><term>Gingival</term><term>Gingival contour</term><term>Gonial widths</term><term>Incisor</term><term>Inverted tooth form</term><term>Lower segment</term><term>Marunick</term><term>Mould</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Ovoid</term><term>Ovoid teeth</term><term>Patient preference</term><term>Patient preferences</term><term>Portrait photographs</term><term>Previous paper</term><term>Profile mirror system</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Replacement teeth</term><term>Seluk</term><term>Significant difference</term><term>Tooth form</term><term>Tooth forms</term><term>Tooth moulds</term><term>Tooth shape</term><term>Trubyte bioform system</term><term>Typal</term><term>Unset</term><term>Unset denture teeth</term><term>Upper halves</term><term>Upper segment</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Actual denture teeth</term><term>Aesthetics</term><term>Anterior teeth</term><term>Artificial teeth</term><term>Brodbelt</term><term>Cervical widths</term><term>Chamberlain</term><term>Chamberlain robinson</term><term>Colour</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Dentogenic concept</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture aesthetics</term><term>Denture form</term><term>Denture patients</term><term>Denture teeth</term><term>Denture tooth moulds</term><term>Digitized</term><term>Edentulous subjects</term><term>Face shape</term><term>Face shapes</term><term>Facial</term><term>Facial form</term><term>Frush</term><term>Gingival</term><term>Gingival contour</term><term>Gonial widths</term><term>Incisor</term><term>Inverted tooth form</term><term>Lower segment</term><term>Marunick</term><term>Mould</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Ovoid</term><term>Ovoid teeth</term><term>Patient preference</term><term>Patient preferences</term><term>Portrait photographs</term><term>Previous paper</term><term>Profile mirror system</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Replacement teeth</term><term>Seluk</term><term>Significant difference</term><term>Tooth form</term><term>Tooth forms</term><term>Tooth moulds</term><term>Tooth shape</term><term>Trubyte bioform system</term><term>Typal</term><term>Unset</term><term>Unset denture teeth</term><term>Upper halves</term><term>Upper segment</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Dentist and patient preferences are often used to select replacement teeth in prosthodontics. Face shape compared with inverted tooth form classifications based on Leon Williams's work are currently used. Shapes of teeth and faces have been referred to as square, ovoid or tapered, or some combination of these. Six patients, three male and three female, were selected as being classically square, tapered or ovoid in facial form. Three sets of dentures had been made for each patient with tapering, ovoid and square denture teeth. Using a standardized photographic technique, full face views with profiles and close‐ups of the teeth were taken. Then from standardized enlarged tracings, key anatomic and derived points were marked, digitized and computer analysed. The face shapes and inverted tooth forms were digitized in the same manner. A comparison of tooth moulds versus the actual denture teeth shows a highly significant difference (P<0.001) between set and unset denture teeth. There is also a significant difference (P<0.001) between facial form and denture teeth using temporal zygomatic and gonial widths for faces, compared with incisal, contact, and cervical widths for the teeth.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>ovoid</json:string><json:string>face shape</json:string><json:string>unset</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>brodbelt</json:string><json:string>denture teeth</json:string><json:string>facial form</json:string><json:string>significant difference</json:string><json:string>frush</json:string><json:string>seluk</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>colour</json:string><json:string>gingival</json:string><json:string>unset denture teeth</json:string><json:string>incisor</json:string><json:string>mould</json:string><json:string>digitized</json:string><json:string>tooth form</json:string><json:string>marunick</json:string><json:string>typal</json:string><json:string>replacement teeth</json:string><json:string>patient preferences</json:string><json:string>denture form</json:string><json:string>tooth moulds</json:string><json:string>upper segment</json:string><json:string>face shapes</json:string><json:string>facial</json:string><json:string>patient preference</json:string><json:string>profile mirror system</json:string><json:string>inverted tooth form</json:string><json:string>tooth forms</json:string><json:string>previous paper</json:string><json:string>actual denture teeth</json:string><json:string>gonial widths</json:string><json:string>artificial teeth</json:string><json:string>chamberlain robinson</json:string><json:string>portrait photographs</json:string><json:string>edentulous subjects</json:string><json:string>denture patients</json:string><json:string>ovoid teeth</json:string><json:string>cervical widths</json:string><json:string>lower segment</json:string><json:string>oral rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>dentogenic concept</json:string><json:string>anterior teeth</json:string><json:string>trubyte bioform system</json:string><json:string>upper halves</json:string><json:string>tooth shape</json:string><json:string>denture tooth moulds</json:string><json:string>gingival contour</json:string><json:string>denture aesthetics</json:string><json:string>chamberlain</json:string><json:string>aesthetics</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>L. W. SELUK</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Michigan School of Dentistry</json:string><json:string>Correspondence address: Dr L. W. Seluk, Department of Partial Denture Prosthodontics, The University of Michigan, School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109‐1078, USA.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>R. H. W. BRODBELT</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Michigan School of Dentistry</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>G. F. WALKER</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Michigan School of Dentistry</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>JOOR139</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-G4VPQ9RG-P</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Dentist and patient preferences are often used to select replacement teeth in prosthodontics. Face shape compared with inverted tooth form classifications based on Leon Williams's work are currently used. Shapes of teeth and faces have been referred to as square, ovoid or tapered, or some combination of these. Six patients, three male and three female, were selected as being classically square, tapered or ovoid in facial form. Three sets of dentures had been made for each patient with tapering, ovoid and square denture teeth. Using a standardized photographic technique, full face views with profiles and close‐ups of the teeth were taken. Then from standardized enlarged tracings, key anatomic and derived points were marked, digitized and computer analysed. The face shapes and inverted tooth forms were digitized in the same manner. A comparison of tooth moulds versus the actual denture teeth shows a highly significant difference (P>0.001) between set and unset denture teeth. There is also a significant difference (P>0.001) between facial form and denture teeth using temporal zygomatic and gonial widths for faces, compared with incisal, contact, and cervical widths for the teeth.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>183</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1195</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><score>6.329</score><pdfWordCount>2133</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>12913</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.6</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>515 x 846 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>A biometric comparison of face shape with denture tooth form</title><pmid><json:string>3550016</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0305-182X</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1365-2842</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JOOR</json:string></publisherId><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>139</first><last>145</last><total>7</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1987</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>The Trubyte Bioform System of Face and Tooth Form and Harmony</json:string><json:string>Department of Partial Denture Prosthodontics, The University of Michigan, School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, Michigan</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>W. Seluk</json:string><json:string>Leon Williams</json:string><json:string>Max Dent</json:string><json:string>L. W. Seluk</json:string><json:string>R.H. W. Brodbelt</json:string><json:string>Min Max</json:string><json:string>Christopher Young</json:string><json:string>Committee</json:string><json:string>Mark T. Marunick</json:string><json:string>R. H. W. Brodbelt</json:string><json:string>M. Nester</json:string><json:string>Barbara C. Chamberlain</json:string><json:string>Craig A. Robinson</json:string><json:string>G. F. Walker</json:string></persName><placeName></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Pinkney & Swenson, 1981</json:string><json:string>Brodbelt et al (1984)</json:string><json:string>Brodbelt et al, 1984</json:string><json:string>Brodbelt, 1978</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-G4VPQ9RG-P</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string><json:string>4 - tumeurs</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1987</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1987</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1365-2842.1987.tb00703.x</json:string></doi><id>1C40CDAC4FC6EC097F78AFBAC4274B6EF60A2E36</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/1C40CDAC4FC6EC097F78AFBAC4274B6EF60A2E36/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/1C40CDAC4FC6EC097F78AFBAC4274B6EF60A2E36/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/1C40CDAC4FC6EC097F78AFBAC4274B6EF60A2E36/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">A biometric comparison of face shape with denture tooth form</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1987-03"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A biometric comparison of face shape with denture tooth form</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">L. W.</forename><surname>SELUK</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Michigan School of Dentistry<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Dr L. W. Seluk, Department of Partial Denture Prosthodontics, The University of Michigan, School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109‐1078, USA.</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">R. H. W.</forename><surname>BRODBELT</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Michigan School of Dentistry<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">G. F.</forename><surname>WALKER</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Michigan School of Dentistry<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">1C40CDAC4FC6EC097F78AFBAC4274B6EF60A2E36</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-G4VPQ9RG-P</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2842.1987.tb00703.x</idno><idno type="unit">JOOR139</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JOOR.JOOR139.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="pISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/jor.1987.14.issue-2</idno><idno type="product">JOOR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="139">139</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="145">145</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1987-03"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Summary</head><p>Dentist and patient preferences are often used to select replacement teeth in prosthodontics. Face shape compared with inverted tooth form classifications based on Leon Williams's work are currently used. Shapes of teeth and faces have been referred to as square, ovoid or tapered, or some combination of these.</p><p>Six patients, three male and three female, were selected as being classically square, tapered or ovoid in facial form. Three sets of dentures had been made for each patient with tapering, ovoid and square denture teeth. Using a standardized photographic technique, full face views with profiles and close‐ups of the teeth were taken. Then from standardized enlarged tracings, key anatomic and derived points were marked, digitized and computer analysed. The face shapes and inverted tooth forms were digitized in the same manner.</p><p>A comparison of tooth moulds versus the actual denture teeth shows a highly significant difference (<hi rend="italic">P</hi><0.001) between set and unset denture teeth. There is also a significant difference (<hi rend="italic">P</hi><0.001) between facial form and denture teeth using temporal zygomatic and gonial widths for faces, compared with incisal, contact, and cervical widths for the teeth.</p></abstract><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/1C40CDAC4FC6EC097F78AFBAC4274B6EF60A2E36/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</doi><issn type="print">0305-182X</issn><issn type="electronic">1365-2842</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JOOR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="03002"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jor.1987.14.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="14">14</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="1987-03">March 1987</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0013900" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1365-2842.1987.tb00703.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JOOR139"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="7"></count></countGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2007-06-08"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-06-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-20"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-30"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="139">139</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="145">145</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Dr L. W. Seluk, Department of Partial Denture Prosthodontics, The University of Michigan, School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109‐1078, USA.</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JOOR.JOOR139.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Manuscript accepted 11 December 1985</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="18"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="4"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">A biometric comparison of face shape with denture tooth form</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>L. W.</givenNames><familyName>SELUK</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>R. H. W.</givenNames><familyName>BRODBELT</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>G. F.</givenNames><familyName>WALKER</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>University of Michigan School of Dentistry</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Summary</title><p>Dentist and patient preferences are often used to select replacement teeth in prosthodontics. Face shape compared with inverted tooth form classifications based on Leon Williams's work are currently used. Shapes of teeth and faces have been referred to as square, ovoid or tapered, or some combination of these.</p><p>Six patients, three male and three female, were selected as being classically square, tapered or ovoid in facial form. Three sets of dentures had been made for each patient with tapering, ovoid and square denture teeth. Using a standardized photographic technique, full face views with profiles and close‐ups of the teeth were taken. Then from standardized enlarged tracings, key anatomic and derived points were marked, digitized and computer analysed. The face shapes and inverted tooth forms were digitized in the same manner.</p><p>A comparison of tooth moulds versus the actual denture teeth shows a highly significant difference (<i>P</i><0.001) between set and unset denture teeth. There is also a significant difference (<i>P</i><0.001) between facial form and denture teeth using temporal zygomatic and gonial widths for faces, compared with incisal, contact, and cervical widths for the teeth.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>A biometric comparison of face shape with denture tooth form</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>A biometric comparison of face shape with denture tooth form</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">L. W.</namePart><namePart type="family">SELUK</namePart><affiliation>University of Michigan School of Dentistry</affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence address: Dr L. W. Seluk, Department of Partial Denture Prosthodontics, The University of Michigan, School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109‐1078, USA.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">R. H. W.</namePart><namePart type="family">BRODBELT</namePart><affiliation>University of Michigan School of Dentistry</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">G. F.</namePart><namePart type="family">WALKER</namePart><affiliation>University of Michigan School of Dentistry</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1987-03</dateIssued><edition>Manuscript accepted 11 December 1985</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1987</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="references">18</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">4</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Dentist and patient preferences are often used to select replacement teeth in prosthodontics. Face shape compared with inverted tooth form classifications based on Leon Williams's work are currently used. Shapes of teeth and faces have been referred to as square, ovoid or tapered, or some combination of these. Six patients, three male and three female, were selected as being classically square, tapered or ovoid in facial form. Three sets of dentures had been made for each patient with tapering, ovoid and square denture teeth. Using a standardized photographic technique, full face views with profiles and close‐ups of the teeth were taken. Then from standardized enlarged tracings, key anatomic and derived points were marked, digitized and computer analysed. The face shapes and inverted tooth forms were digitized in the same manner. A comparison of tooth moulds versus the actual denture teeth shows a highly significant difference (P<0.001) between set and unset denture teeth. There is also a significant difference (P<0.001) between facial form and denture teeth using temporal zygomatic and gonial widths for faces, compared with incisal, contact, and cervical widths for the teeth.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0305-182X</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JOOR</identifier><part><date>1987</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>14</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>139</start><end>145</end><total>7</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">1C40CDAC4FC6EC097F78AFBAC4274B6EF60A2E36</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-G4VPQ9RG-P</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2842.1987.tb00703.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JOOR139</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/1C40CDAC4FC6EC097F78AFBAC4274B6EF60A2E36/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000E02 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000E02 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:1C40CDAC4FC6EC097F78AFBAC4274B6EF60A2E36
|texte= A biometric comparison of face shape with denture tooth form
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |