Biologic outcome of implant‐supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism
Identifieur interne : 000C62 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000C61; suivant : 000C63Biologic outcome of implant‐supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism
Auteurs : Ignace Naert ; George Koutsikakis ; Joke Duyck ; Marc Quirynen ; Reinhilde Jacobs ; Daniel Van SteenbergheSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2002-08.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Account implant interdependency, Biologic outcome, Clin, Clinical evaluation, Cumulative survival rate, Cumulative survival rates, Dentistry, Edentulism, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Frailty, Frailty model, Hazard rate, Hazard ratio, Impl, Implant, Implant failure, Implant failures, Implant installation, Implant length, Implant research, Implant restorations, Implantate, Implantes, International journal, Last control, Lekholm, Leuven, Life table analysis, Mandible, Maxilla, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Naert, Oral impl, Oral implants, Osseointegrated, Other hand, Partial edentulism, Partial prostheses, Partial prosthesis, Partial restorations table, Periodontology, Proportional hazard model, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Quirynen, Random effect, Single crowns, Steenberghe, Survival function, Survival rate, Survival rates, Upper limit, Years years, Zarb.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Account implant interdependency, Biologic outcome, Clin, Clinical evaluation, Cumulative survival rate, Cumulative survival rates, Dentistry, Edentulism, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Frailty, Frailty model, Hazard rate, Hazard ratio, Impl, Implant, Implant failure, Implant failures, Implant installation, Implant length, Implant research, Implant restorations, Implantate, Implantes, International journal, Last control, Lekholm, Leuven, Life table analysis, Mandible, Maxilla, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Naert, Oral impl, Oral implants, Osseointegrated, Other hand, Partial edentulism, Partial prostheses, Partial prosthesis, Partial restorations table, Periodontology, Proportional hazard model, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Quirynen, Random effect, Single crowns, Steenberghe, Survival function, Survival rate, Survival rates, Upper limit, Years years, Zarb.
Abstract
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to predict the outcome of implant restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism, taking into account implant interdependency and the effect of several confounding variables. Between December 1982 and June 1998, 1956 Brånemark system® implants (1212 and 744 in the maxilla and mandible, respectively, 846 distal to first premolars) were installed in 660 patients (248 males) at the Department of Periodontology of the University Hospitals of the Catholic University of Leuven. Of the 810 restorations installed at the Department of Prosthetic Dentistry of the same hospital, 235 were single crowns, 166 were supported by implants and teeth and 409 were free‐standing fixed partial prostheses. An additional 87 restorations was placed in private dental offices and were not included. The patients were followed from implant installation until June 1999. The estimated cumulative survival rates were 91.4% for all implants and 95.8% for all restorations over a period of 16 years. Estimated cumulative survival rates from loading for implant‐tooth connected and free‐standing implants were, respectively, 93.6% and 97.2%. Neither jaw site nor implant position (anterior–posterior) had any significant effect on the outcome. Short implant length, high number of implants per patient, low number of implants per prosthesis, implants loaded by acrylic‐veneered restorations and implants combined with bone grafting present a higher risk hazard for implant failure. The idea of not splinting the implants in a fixed partial prosthesis is promising but needs replication before accepting it.
Url:
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130406.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:19ADF731B6DD42DE4FF5DCC451538A863E3BA29DLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Biologic outcome of implant‐supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism</title><author><name sortKey="Naert, Ignace" sort="Naert, Ignace" uniqKey="Naert I" first="Ignace" last="Naert">Ignace Naert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Koutsikakis, George" sort="Koutsikakis, George" uniqKey="Koutsikakis G" first="George" last="Koutsikakis">George Koutsikakis</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Duyck, Joke" sort="Duyck, Joke" uniqKey="Duyck J" first="Joke" last="Duyck">Joke Duyck</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, Marc" sort="Quirynen, Marc" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="Marc" last="Quirynen">Marc Quirynen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jacobs, Reinhilde" sort="Jacobs, Reinhilde" uniqKey="Jacobs R" first="Reinhilde" last="Jacobs">Reinhilde Jacobs</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, Daniel" sort="Van Steenberghe, Daniel" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="Daniel" last="Van Steenberghe">Daniel Van Steenberghe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:19ADF731B6DD42DE4FF5DCC451538A863E3BA29D</idno><date when="2002" year="2002">2002</date><idno type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130406.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/19ADF731B6DD42DE4FF5DCC451538A863E3BA29D/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000C62</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000C62</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Biologic outcome of implant‐supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism</title><author><name sortKey="Naert, Ignace" sort="Naert, Ignace" uniqKey="Naert I" first="Ignace" last="Naert">Ignace Naert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Koutsikakis, George" sort="Koutsikakis, George" uniqKey="Koutsikakis G" first="George" last="Koutsikakis">George Koutsikakis</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Duyck, Joke" sort="Duyck, Joke" uniqKey="Duyck J" first="Joke" last="Duyck">Joke Duyck</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, Marc" sort="Quirynen, Marc" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="Marc" last="Quirynen">Marc Quirynen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jacobs, Reinhilde" sort="Jacobs, Reinhilde" uniqKey="Jacobs R" first="Reinhilde" last="Jacobs">Reinhilde Jacobs</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, Daniel" sort="Van Steenberghe, Daniel" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="Daniel" last="Van Steenberghe">Daniel Van Steenberghe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">13</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="381">381</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="389">389</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Science, Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-08">2002-08</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Account implant interdependency</term><term>Biologic outcome</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical evaluation</term><term>Cumulative survival rate</term><term>Cumulative survival rates</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Edentulism</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Frailty</term><term>Frailty model</term><term>Hazard rate</term><term>Hazard ratio</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant failures</term><term>Implant installation</term><term>Implant length</term><term>Implant research</term><term>Implant restorations</term><term>Implantate</term><term>Implantes</term><term>International journal</term><term>Last control</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Leuven</term><term>Life table analysis</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Naert</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Other hand</term><term>Partial edentulism</term><term>Partial prostheses</term><term>Partial prosthesis</term><term>Partial restorations table</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Proportional hazard model</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Quirynen</term><term>Random effect</term><term>Single crowns</term><term>Steenberghe</term><term>Survival function</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Survival rates</term><term>Upper limit</term><term>Years years</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Account implant interdependency</term><term>Biologic outcome</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical evaluation</term><term>Cumulative survival rate</term><term>Cumulative survival rates</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Edentulism</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Frailty</term><term>Frailty model</term><term>Hazard rate</term><term>Hazard ratio</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant failures</term><term>Implant installation</term><term>Implant length</term><term>Implant research</term><term>Implant restorations</term><term>Implantate</term><term>Implantes</term><term>International journal</term><term>Last control</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Leuven</term><term>Life table analysis</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Naert</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Other hand</term><term>Partial edentulism</term><term>Partial prostheses</term><term>Partial prosthesis</term><term>Partial restorations table</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Proportional hazard model</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Quirynen</term><term>Random effect</term><term>Single crowns</term><term>Steenberghe</term><term>Survival function</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Survival rates</term><term>Upper limit</term><term>Years years</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Abstract: The purpose of this study was to predict the outcome of implant restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism, taking into account implant interdependency and the effect of several confounding variables. Between December 1982 and June 1998, 1956 Brånemark system® implants (1212 and 744 in the maxilla and mandible, respectively, 846 distal to first premolars) were installed in 660 patients (248 males) at the Department of Periodontology of the University Hospitals of the Catholic University of Leuven. Of the 810 restorations installed at the Department of Prosthetic Dentistry of the same hospital, 235 were single crowns, 166 were supported by implants and teeth and 409 were free‐standing fixed partial prostheses. An additional 87 restorations was placed in private dental offices and were not included. The patients were followed from implant installation until June 1999. The estimated cumulative survival rates were 91.4% for all implants and 95.8% for all restorations over a period of 16 years. Estimated cumulative survival rates from loading for implant‐tooth connected and free‐standing implants were, respectively, 93.6% and 97.2%. Neither jaw site nor implant position (anterior–posterior) had any significant effect on the outcome. Short implant length, high number of implants per patient, low number of implants per prosthesis, implants loaded by acrylic‐veneered restorations and implants combined with bone grafting present a higher risk hazard for implant failure. The idea of not splinting the implants in a fixed partial prosthesis is promising but needs replication before accepting it.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>hazard rate</json:string><json:string>naert</json:string><json:string>partial prostheses</json:string><json:string>steenberghe</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>edentulism</json:string><json:string>implantes</json:string><json:string>years years</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>clinical evaluation</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>implantate</json:string><json:string>quirynen</json:string><json:string>impl</json:string><json:string>partial edentulism</json:string><json:string>lekholm</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>frailty</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>cumulative survival rate</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>zarb</json:string><json:string>leuven</json:string><json:string>implant installation</json:string><json:string>survival function</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>periodontology</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>survival rate</json:string><json:string>implant research</json:string><json:string>single crowns</json:string><json:string>abutment connection</json:string><json:string>implant length</json:string><json:string>proportional hazard model</json:string><json:string>frailty model</json:string><json:string>life table analysis</json:string><json:string>last control</json:string><json:string>partial prosthesis</json:string><json:string>implant failures</json:string><json:string>other hand</json:string><json:string>survival rates</json:string><json:string>cumulative survival rates</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>random effect</json:string><json:string>upper limit</json:string><json:string>implant failure</json:string><json:string>partial restorations table</json:string><json:string>oral implants</json:string><json:string>account implant interdependency</json:string><json:string>implant restorations</json:string><json:string>hazard ratio</json:string><json:string>biologic outcome</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Ignace Naert</name><affiliations><json:string>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>George Koutsikakis</name><affiliations><json:string>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Joke Duyck</name><affiliations><json:string>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Marc Quirynen</name><affiliations><json:string>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Reinhilde Jacobs</name><affiliations><json:string>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Daniel Van Steenberghe</name><affiliations><json:string>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant survival</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant‐tooth connection</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>partial edentulism</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>posterior implants</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>clr11o746</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-B26LTM1G-8</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: The purpose of this study was to predict the outcome of implant restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism, taking into account implant interdependency and the effect of several confounding variables. Between December 1982 and June 1998, 1956 Brånemark system® implants (1212 and 744 in the maxilla and mandible, respectively, 846 distal to first premolars) were installed in 660 patients (248 males) at the Department of Periodontology of the University Hospitals of the Catholic University of Leuven. Of the 810 restorations installed at the Department of Prosthetic Dentistry of the same hospital, 235 were single crowns, 166 were supported by implants and teeth and 409 were free‐standing fixed partial prostheses. An additional 87 restorations was placed in private dental offices and were not included. The patients were followed from implant installation until June 1999. The estimated cumulative survival rates were 91.4% for all implants and 95.8% for all restorations over a period of 16 years. Estimated cumulative survival rates from loading for implant‐tooth connected and free‐standing implants were, respectively, 93.6% and 97.2%. Neither jaw site nor implant position (anterior–posterior) had any significant effect on the outcome. Short implant length, high number of implants per patient, low number of implants per prosthesis, implants loaded by acrylic‐veneered restorations and implants combined with bone grafting present a higher risk hazard for implant failure. The idea of not splinting the implants in a fixed partial prosthesis is promising but needs replication before accepting it.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>9.88</score><pdfWordCount>5301</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>37610</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595 x 794 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>240</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1629</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Biologic outcome of implant‐supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism</title><pmid><json:string>12175375</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><pages><first>381</first><last>389</last><total>9</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>between December 1982 and June 1998</json:string><json:string>2002</json:string><json:string>1999</json:string><json:string>1988</json:string><json:string>Between December 1982 and June 1998, 1956</json:string><json:string>1956</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Hospital Universi</json:string><json:string>Research Council</json:string><json:string>Universität Leuven</json:string><json:string>Department of Periodontology</json:string><json:string>Department of Periodontology of the University Hospitals of the Catholic University of Leuven</json:string><json:string>Catholic University</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry of the University Hospitals of the Catholic University Leuven</json:string><json:string>Leuven Belgium Fax</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry</json:string><json:string>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Marc Quirynen</json:string><json:string>Deceased</json:string><json:string>Daniel van Steenberghe</json:string><json:string>I. E. Naert</json:string><json:string>The</json:string><json:string>George Koutsikakis</json:string><json:string>Ignace Naert</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Leuven</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Belgium</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Naert et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. (1992b)</json:string><json:string>Naert et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Adell et al. 1985</json:string><json:string>June 1999</json:string><json:string>Buser et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 1992a</json:string><json:string>van Steenberghe 1997</json:string><json:string>Hougaard 2000</json:string><json:string>Parein et al. (1997)</json:string><json:string>Albrektsson & Isidor 1994</json:string><json:string>Hermann et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Naert et al. (2001)</json:string><json:string>Hultin et al. (2000)</json:string><json:string>Esposito et al. (1998a)</json:string><json:string>Lindh et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Lekholm et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Zarb & Jansson 1985</json:string><json:string>Lekholm et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Naert et al. 2002b</json:string><json:string>Weintraub & Burt 1985</json:string><json:string>Babbush et al. (1986)</json:string><json:string>Esposito et al. (1998b)</json:string><json:string>Rangert et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>van Steenberghe 1989</json:string><json:string>Buser et al. (1997)</json:string><json:string>Naert et al</json:string><json:string>Meskin & Brown 1988</json:string><json:string>Naert et al. 1988</json:string><json:string>Gunne et al. (1999)</json:string><json:string>Wyatt & Zarb 1998</json:string><json:string>Hämmerle et al. 2000</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-B26LTM1G-8</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2002</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2002</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130406.x</json:string></doi><id>19ADF731B6DD42DE4FF5DCC451538A863E3BA29D</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/19ADF731B6DD42DE4FF5DCC451538A863E3BA29D/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/19ADF731B6DD42DE4FF5DCC451538A863E3BA29D/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/19ADF731B6DD42DE4FF5DCC451538A863E3BA29D/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Biologic outcome of implant‐supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Science, Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-08"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Biologic outcome of implant‐supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism</title><title level="a" type="sub">Part 1: A longitudinal clinical evaluation</title><title level="a" type="short">Clinical evaluation of implant‐fixed partial restorations</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Ignace</forename><surname>Naert</surname></persName><affiliation>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.
Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,
Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">George</forename><surname>Koutsikakis</surname></persName><affiliation>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.
Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,
Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Joke</forename><surname>Duyck</surname></persName><affiliation>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.
Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,
Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Marc</forename><surname>Quirynen</surname></persName><affiliation>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.
Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,
Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Reinhilde</forename><surname>Jacobs</surname></persName><affiliation>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.
Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,
Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0005"><persName><forename type="first">Daniel</forename><surname>Van Steenberghe</surname></persName><affiliation>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.
Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,
Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">19ADF731B6DD42DE4FF5DCC451538A863E3BA29D</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-B26LTM1G-8</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130406.x</idno><idno type="supplier">clr11o746</idno><idno type="unit">CLR130406</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR130406.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2002.13.issue-4</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">13</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="381">381</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="389">389</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Science, Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-08"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold">Abstract:</hi> The purpose of this study was to predict the outcome of implant restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism, taking into account implant interdependency and the effect of several confounding variables. Between December 1982 and June 1998, 1956 Brånemark system<hi rend="superscript">®</hi> implants (1212 and 744 in the maxilla and mandible, respectively, 846 distal to first premolars) were installed in 660 patients (248 males) at the Department of Periodontology of the University Hospitals of the Catholic University of Leuven. Of the 810 restorations installed at the Department of Prosthetic Dentistry of the same hospital, 235 were single crowns, 166 were supported by implants and teeth and 409 were free‐standing fixed partial prostheses. An additional 87 restorations was placed in private dental offices and were not included. The patients were followed from implant installation until June 1999. The estimated cumulative survival rates were 91.4% for all implants and 95.8% for all restorations over a period of 16 years. Estimated cumulative survival rates from loading for implant‐tooth connected and free‐standing implants were, respectively, 93.6% and 97.2%. Neither jaw site nor implant position (anterior–posterior) had any significant effect on the outcome. Short implant length, high number of implants per patient, low number of implants per prosthesis, implants loaded by acrylic‐veneered restorations and implants combined with bone grafting present a higher risk hazard for implant failure. The idea of not splinting the implants in a fixed partial prosthesis is promising but needs replication before accepting it.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">dental implants</term><term xml:id="k2">implant survival</term><term xml:id="k3">implant‐tooth connection</term><term xml:id="k4">partial edentulism</term><term xml:id="k5">posterior implants</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original article</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/19ADF731B6DD42DE4FF5DCC451538A863E3BA29D/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Science, Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="08004"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2002.13.issue-4</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="13">13</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="4">4</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2002-08">August 2002</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0038100" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130406.x</doi><idGroup><id type="supplier" value="clr11o746"></id><id type="unit" value="CLR130406"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="9"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original article</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2002-08-14"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2002-08-14"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="381">381</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="389">389</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>
<i>Prof. I. E. Naert</i>
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry
School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and
Maxillofacial Surgery
Kapucijnenvoer, 7
B‐3000 Leuven
Belgium
Fax: + 32 16 33 23 09
e‐mail: <email>Ignace.Naert@med.kuleuven.ac.be</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR130406.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted 30 August 2001</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="13"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="32"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="6284"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="21"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Biologic outcome of implant‐supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism</title><title type="subtitle">Part 1: A longitudinal clinical evaluation</title><title type="shortAuthors">Naert et al</title><title type="short">Clinical evaluation of implant‐fixed partial restorations</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>Ignace</givenNames><familyName>Naert</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>George</givenNames><familyName>Koutsikakis</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>Joke</givenNames><familyName>Duyck</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>Marc</givenNames><familyName>Quirynen</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>Reinhilde</givenNames><familyName>Jacobs</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr6" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>Daniel</givenNames><familyName>Van Steenberghe</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="aff-1-1" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation><i>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,</i>
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.
<i>Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,</i>
Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">dental implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">implant survival</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">implant‐tooth connection</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">partial edentulism</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">posterior implants</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Abstract:</b> The purpose of this study was to predict the outcome of implant restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism, taking into account implant interdependency and the effect of several confounding variables. Between December 1982 and June 1998, 1956 Brånemark system<sup>®</sup> implants (1212 and 744 in the maxilla and mandible, respectively, 846 distal to first premolars) were installed in 660 patients (248 males) at the Department of Periodontology of the University Hospitals of the Catholic University of Leuven. Of the 810 restorations installed at the Department of Prosthetic Dentistry of the same hospital, 235 were single crowns, 166 were supported by implants and teeth and 409 were free‐standing fixed partial prostheses. An additional 87 restorations was placed in private dental offices and were not included. The patients were followed from implant installation until June 1999. The estimated cumulative survival rates were 91.4% for all implants and 95.8% for all restorations over a period of 16 years. Estimated cumulative survival rates from loading for implant‐tooth connected and free‐standing implants were, respectively, 93.6% and 97.2%. Neither jaw site nor implant position (anterior–posterior) had any significant effect on the outcome. Short implant length, high number of implants per patient, low number of implants per prosthesis, implants loaded by acrylic‐veneered restorations and implants combined with bone grafting present a higher risk hazard for implant failure. The idea of not splinting the implants in a fixed partial prosthesis is promising but needs replication before accepting it.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Biologic outcome of implant‐supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism</title><subTitle>Part 1: A longitudinal clinical evaluation</subTitle></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Clinical evaluation of implant‐fixed partial restorations</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Biologic outcome of implant‐supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Ignace</namePart><namePart type="family">Naert</namePart><affiliation>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">George</namePart><namePart type="family">Koutsikakis</namePart><affiliation>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Joke</namePart><namePart type="family">Duyck</namePart><affiliation>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Marc</namePart><namePart type="family">Quirynen</namePart><affiliation>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Reinhilde</namePart><namePart type="family">Jacobs</namePart><affiliation>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Daniel</namePart><namePart type="family">Van Steenberghe</namePart><affiliation>Ignace Naert, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck,Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe,Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Science, Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2002-08</dateIssued><edition>Accepted 30 August 2001</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2002</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">0</extent><extent unit="tables">13</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">32</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">6284</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Abstract: The purpose of this study was to predict the outcome of implant restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism, taking into account implant interdependency and the effect of several confounding variables. Between December 1982 and June 1998, 1956 Brånemark system® implants (1212 and 744 in the maxilla and mandible, respectively, 846 distal to first premolars) were installed in 660 patients (248 males) at the Department of Periodontology of the University Hospitals of the Catholic University of Leuven. Of the 810 restorations installed at the Department of Prosthetic Dentistry of the same hospital, 235 were single crowns, 166 were supported by implants and teeth and 409 were free‐standing fixed partial prostheses. An additional 87 restorations was placed in private dental offices and were not included. The patients were followed from implant installation until June 1999. The estimated cumulative survival rates were 91.4% for all implants and 95.8% for all restorations over a period of 16 years. Estimated cumulative survival rates from loading for implant‐tooth connected and free‐standing implants were, respectively, 93.6% and 97.2%. Neither jaw site nor implant position (anterior–posterior) had any significant effect on the outcome. Short implant length, high number of implants per patient, low number of implants per prosthesis, implants loaded by acrylic‐veneered restorations and implants combined with bone grafting present a higher risk hazard for implant failure. The idea of not splinting the implants in a fixed partial prosthesis is promising but needs replication before accepting it.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>dental implants</topic><topic>implant survival</topic><topic>implant‐tooth connection</topic><topic>partial edentulism</topic><topic>posterior implants</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2002</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>13</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>381</start><end>389</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">19ADF731B6DD42DE4FF5DCC451538A863E3BA29D</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-B26LTM1G-8</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130406.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">clr11o746</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Science, Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/19ADF731B6DD42DE4FF5DCC451538A863E3BA29D/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000C62 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000C62 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:19ADF731B6DD42DE4FF5DCC451538A863E3BA29D
|texte= Biologic outcome of implant‐supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |