Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Effect of Implant Angulation, Connection Length, and Impression Material on the Dimensional Accuracy of Implant Impressions: An In Vitro Comparative Study

Identifieur interne : 000C33 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000C32; suivant : 000C34

Effect of Implant Angulation, Connection Length, and Impression Material on the Dimensional Accuracy of Implant Impressions: An In Vitro Comparative Study

Auteurs : Roberto Sorrentino ; Enrico Felice Gherlone ; Gaetano Calesini ; Fernando Zarone

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:190E96DE7AA64C2BA5B0A364D3F7AC0066D157BE

English descriptors

Abstract

Background: With regard to implant‐supported prostheses, to date no technique has been proven to guarantee a completely passive fit of prosthetic frameworks. Several clinical variables may affect the precision of impressions, particularly in the presence of implants.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00167.x

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:190E96DE7AA64C2BA5B0A364D3F7AC0066D157BE

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Effect of Implant Angulation, Connection Length, and Impression Material on the Dimensional Accuracy of Implant Impressions: An In Vitro Comparative Study</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sorrentino, Roberto" sort="Sorrentino, Roberto" uniqKey="Sorrentino R" first="Roberto" last="Sorrentino">Roberto Sorrentino</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Doctor, Department of Prosthodontics, University “Federico II,” Naples, Italy;</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gherlone, Enrico Felice" sort="Gherlone, Enrico Felice" uniqKey="Gherlone E" first="Enrico Felice" last="Gherlone">Enrico Felice Gherlone</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>professor, Department of Dentistry, University “Vita Salute San Raffaele,” Milan, Italy;</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Calesini, Gaetano" sort="Calesini, Gaetano" uniqKey="Calesini G" first="Gaetano" last="Calesini">Gaetano Calesini</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>private practice, Rome, Italy;</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Zarone, Fernando" sort="Zarone, Fernando" uniqKey="Zarone F" first="Fernando" last="Zarone">Fernando Zarone</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>professor, Department of Prosthodontics, University “Federico II,” Naples, Italy</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>E-mail: zarone@tin.it</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:190E96DE7AA64C2BA5B0A364D3F7AC0066D157BE</idno>
<date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00167.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/190E96DE7AA64C2BA5B0A364D3F7AC0066D157BE/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000C33</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000C33</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">Effect of Implant Angulation, Connection Length, and Impression Material on the Dimensional Accuracy of Implant Impressions: An In Vitro Comparative Study</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sorrentino, Roberto" sort="Sorrentino, Roberto" uniqKey="Sorrentino R" first="Roberto" last="Sorrentino">Roberto Sorrentino</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Doctor, Department of Prosthodontics, University “Federico II,” Naples, Italy;</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gherlone, Enrico Felice" sort="Gherlone, Enrico Felice" uniqKey="Gherlone E" first="Enrico Felice" last="Gherlone">Enrico Felice Gherlone</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>professor, Department of Dentistry, University “Vita Salute San Raffaele,” Milan, Italy;</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Calesini, Gaetano" sort="Calesini, Gaetano" uniqKey="Calesini G" first="Gaetano" last="Calesini">Gaetano Calesini</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>private practice, Rome, Italy;</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Zarone, Fernando" sort="Zarone, Fernando" uniqKey="Zarone F" first="Fernando" last="Zarone">Fernando Zarone</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>professor, Department of Prosthodontics, University “Federico II,” Naples, Italy</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>E-mail: zarone@tin.it</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title>
<title level="j" type="sub">Immediate Loading of Dental Implants</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">12</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="e63">e63</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="e76">e76</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">14</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2010-05">2010-05</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Absolute control values</term>
<term>Absolute distortion</term>
<term>Abutment</term>
<term>Addition silicon</term>
<term>Addition silicons</term>
<term>Analogue</term>
<term>Angulated implants</term>
<term>Angulation</term>
<term>Cause strains</term>
<term>Clinical implant dentistry</term>
<term>Clinical practice</term>
<term>Connection length</term>
<term>Connection part</term>
<term>Control groups</term>
<term>Control models</term>
<term>Coping</term>
<term>Custom trays</term>
<term>Data distribution</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental stone</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Different impression materials</term>
<term>Different lengths</term>
<term>Dimensional accuracy</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous plane</term>
<term>Edentulous ridge</term>
<term>Effects source</term>
<term>Effects source type</term>
<term>Elastomeric impression materials</term>
<term>Electric discharge machining</term>
<term>Experimental groups</term>
<term>Experimental models</term>
<term>Fernando zarone</term>
<term>Higher forces</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant analogue</term>
<term>Implant analogues</term>
<term>Implant angulation</term>
<term>Implant dent</term>
<term>Implant impression techniques</term>
<term>Implant impressions</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Implant prosthodontics</term>
<term>Important role</term>
<term>Impression accuracy</term>
<term>Impression carrier</term>
<term>Impression copings</term>
<term>Impression material</term>
<term>Impression materials</term>
<term>Impression procedures</term>
<term>Impression removal</term>
<term>Impression technique</term>
<term>Impression techniques</term>
<term>Impression tray</term>
<term>Impression trays</term>
<term>Interest statement</term>
<term>Internal connection</term>
<term>Intraoperator error variability</term>
<term>Intraoral</term>
<term>Intraoral position</term>
<term>Jemt</term>
<term>Laboratory investigation</term>
<term>Laboratory procedures</term>
<term>Longitudinal axes</term>
<term>Master cast accuracy</term>
<term>Master model</term>
<term>Master models</term>
<term>Material accuracy</term>
<term>Maxillary crest</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Measurements tests</term>
<term>Mechanical properties</term>
<term>Mesial</term>
<term>Mesial aspect</term>
<term>Minor movements</term>
<term>Model intercept material angulation</term>
<term>Nicholls</term>
<term>Nonparallel</term>
<term>Nonparallel implants</term>
<term>Null hypotheses</term>
<term>Numerical control machine</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Osseointegrated</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Parallel implants</term>
<term>Pattern resin</term>
<term>Present investigation</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthodont</term>
<term>Prosthodontics</term>
<term>Reference points</term>
<term>Relative distortion</term>
<term>Relative humidity</term>
<term>Removal forces</term>
<term>Repeatable position</term>
<term>Right impression copings</term>
<term>Same height</term>
<term>Same time</term>
<term>Second molars</term>
<term>Second premolars</term>
<term>Silicon</term>
<term>Silicon indexes</term>
<term>Stainless steel</term>
<term>Stainless steel quadrangular plate</term>
<term>Standard deviations</term>
<term>Standard length connection</term>
<term>Statistical analysis</term>
<term>Stock trays</term>
<term>Subgingival depth</term>
<term>Testing device</term>
<term>Testing machine</term>
<term>Titanium frameworks</term>
<term>Transfer impressions</term>
<term>Winsix implant system</term>
<term>Zhermack</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Absolute control values</term>
<term>Absolute distortion</term>
<term>Abutment</term>
<term>Addition silicon</term>
<term>Addition silicons</term>
<term>Analogue</term>
<term>Angulated implants</term>
<term>Angulation</term>
<term>Cause strains</term>
<term>Clinical implant dentistry</term>
<term>Clinical practice</term>
<term>Connection length</term>
<term>Connection part</term>
<term>Control groups</term>
<term>Control models</term>
<term>Coping</term>
<term>Custom trays</term>
<term>Data distribution</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental stone</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Different impression materials</term>
<term>Different lengths</term>
<term>Dimensional accuracy</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous plane</term>
<term>Edentulous ridge</term>
<term>Effects source</term>
<term>Effects source type</term>
<term>Elastomeric impression materials</term>
<term>Electric discharge machining</term>
<term>Experimental groups</term>
<term>Experimental models</term>
<term>Fernando zarone</term>
<term>Higher forces</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant analogue</term>
<term>Implant analogues</term>
<term>Implant angulation</term>
<term>Implant dent</term>
<term>Implant impression techniques</term>
<term>Implant impressions</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Implant prosthodontics</term>
<term>Important role</term>
<term>Impression accuracy</term>
<term>Impression carrier</term>
<term>Impression copings</term>
<term>Impression material</term>
<term>Impression materials</term>
<term>Impression procedures</term>
<term>Impression removal</term>
<term>Impression technique</term>
<term>Impression techniques</term>
<term>Impression tray</term>
<term>Impression trays</term>
<term>Interest statement</term>
<term>Internal connection</term>
<term>Intraoperator error variability</term>
<term>Intraoral</term>
<term>Intraoral position</term>
<term>Jemt</term>
<term>Laboratory investigation</term>
<term>Laboratory procedures</term>
<term>Longitudinal axes</term>
<term>Master cast accuracy</term>
<term>Master model</term>
<term>Master models</term>
<term>Material accuracy</term>
<term>Maxillary crest</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Measurements tests</term>
<term>Mechanical properties</term>
<term>Mesial</term>
<term>Mesial aspect</term>
<term>Minor movements</term>
<term>Model intercept material angulation</term>
<term>Nicholls</term>
<term>Nonparallel</term>
<term>Nonparallel implants</term>
<term>Null hypotheses</term>
<term>Numerical control machine</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Osseointegrated</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Parallel implants</term>
<term>Pattern resin</term>
<term>Present investigation</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthodont</term>
<term>Prosthodontics</term>
<term>Reference points</term>
<term>Relative distortion</term>
<term>Relative humidity</term>
<term>Removal forces</term>
<term>Repeatable position</term>
<term>Right impression copings</term>
<term>Same height</term>
<term>Same time</term>
<term>Second molars</term>
<term>Second premolars</term>
<term>Silicon</term>
<term>Silicon indexes</term>
<term>Stainless steel</term>
<term>Stainless steel quadrangular plate</term>
<term>Standard deviations</term>
<term>Standard length connection</term>
<term>Statistical analysis</term>
<term>Stock trays</term>
<term>Subgingival depth</term>
<term>Testing device</term>
<term>Testing machine</term>
<term>Titanium frameworks</term>
<term>Transfer impressions</term>
<term>Winsix implant system</term>
<term>Zhermack</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract">Background: With regard to implant‐supported prostheses, to date no technique has been proven to guarantee a completely passive fit of prosthetic frameworks. Several clinical variables may affect the precision of impressions, particularly in the presence of implants.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex>
<corpusName>wiley</corpusName>
<keywords>
<teeft>
<json:string>implant</json:string>
<json:string>angulation</json:string>
<json:string>prosthet</json:string>
<json:string>prosthet dent</json:string>
<json:string>impression material</json:string>
<json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string>
<json:string>prosthesis</json:string>
<json:string>maxillofac</json:string>
<json:string>addition silicon</json:string>
<json:string>prosthodont</json:string>
<json:string>nonparallel</json:string>
<json:string>master model</json:string>
<json:string>impression copings</json:string>
<json:string>connection length</json:string>
<json:string>impression materials</json:string>
<json:string>impression techniques</json:string>
<json:string>implant angulation</json:string>
<json:string>testing machine</json:string>
<json:string>zhermack</json:string>
<json:string>osseointegrated</json:string>
<json:string>prosthodontics</json:string>
<json:string>dent</json:string>
<json:string>master models</json:string>
<json:string>jemt</json:string>
<json:string>nicholls</json:string>
<json:string>prosthetic</json:string>
<json:string>intraoral</json:string>
<json:string>mesial</json:string>
<json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>abutment</json:string>
<json:string>implant analogues</json:string>
<json:string>parallel implants</json:string>
<json:string>analogue</json:string>
<json:string>longitudinal axes</json:string>
<json:string>nonparallel implants</json:string>
<json:string>addition silicons</json:string>
<json:string>impression carrier</json:string>
<json:string>present investigation</json:string>
<json:string>silicon</json:string>
<json:string>implant impressions</json:string>
<json:string>impression accuracy</json:string>
<json:string>implant prosthodontics</json:string>
<json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string>
<json:string>angulated implants</json:string>
<json:string>model intercept material angulation</json:string>
<json:string>measurements tests</json:string>
<json:string>important role</json:string>
<json:string>mesial aspect</json:string>
<json:string>dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>edentulous</json:string>
<json:string>intraoperator error variability</json:string>
<json:string>pattern resin</json:string>
<json:string>winsix implant system</json:string>
<json:string>right impression copings</json:string>
<json:string>impression tray</json:string>
<json:string>removal forces</json:string>
<json:string>numerical control machine</json:string>
<json:string>elastomeric impression materials</json:string>
<json:string>dimensional accuracy</json:string>
<json:string>same time</json:string>
<json:string>impression trays</json:string>
<json:string>coping</json:string>
<json:string>impression removal</json:string>
<json:string>cause strains</json:string>
<json:string>standard length connection</json:string>
<json:string>impression procedures</json:string>
<json:string>silicon indexes</json:string>
<json:string>null hypotheses</json:string>
<json:string>laboratory procedures</json:string>
<json:string>experimental models</json:string>
<json:string>maxillary crest</json:string>
<json:string>higher forces</json:string>
<json:string>different lengths</json:string>
<json:string>edentulous plane</json:string>
<json:string>stock trays</json:string>
<json:string>relative humidity</json:string>
<json:string>same height</json:string>
<json:string>connection part</json:string>
<json:string>impression technique</json:string>
<json:string>implant analogue</json:string>
<json:string>different impression materials</json:string>
<json:string>reference points</json:string>
<json:string>present study</json:string>
<json:string>stainless steel</json:string>
<json:string>statistical analysis</json:string>
<json:string>data distribution</json:string>
<json:string>standard deviations</json:string>
<json:string>absolute control values</json:string>
<json:string>control models</json:string>
<json:string>intraoral position</json:string>
<json:string>effects source</json:string>
<json:string>material accuracy</json:string>
<json:string>internal connection</json:string>
<json:string>effects source type</json:string>
<json:string>minor movements</json:string>
<json:string>stainless steel quadrangular plate</json:string>
<json:string>experimental groups</json:string>
<json:string>mechanical properties</json:string>
<json:string>clinical practice</json:string>
<json:string>repeatable position</json:string>
<json:string>subgingival depth</json:string>
<json:string>implant placement</json:string>
<json:string>absolute distortion</json:string>
<json:string>relative distortion</json:string>
<json:string>interest statement</json:string>
<json:string>control groups</json:string>
<json:string>testing device</json:string>
<json:string>second premolars</json:string>
<json:string>second molars</json:string>
<json:string>fernando zarone</json:string>
<json:string>electric discharge machining</json:string>
<json:string>edentulous ridge</json:string>
<json:string>titanium frameworks</json:string>
<json:string>dental stone</json:string>
<json:string>implant impression techniques</json:string>
<json:string>implant dent</json:string>
<json:string>custom trays</json:string>
<json:string>oral rehabil</json:string>
<json:string>master cast accuracy</json:string>
<json:string>laboratory investigation</json:string>
<json:string>transfer impressions</json:string>
</teeft>
</keywords>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>Roberto Sorrentino DDS, MSc, PhD</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>Doctor, Department of Prosthodontics, University “Federico II,” Naples, Italy;</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<name>Enrico Felice Gherlone MD, DDS</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>professor, Department of Dentistry, University “Vita Salute San Raffaele,” Milan, Italy;</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<name>Gaetano Calesini MD, DDS</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>private practice, Rome, Italy;</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<name>Fernando Zarone MD, DDS</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>professor, Department of Prosthodontics, University “Federico II,” Naples, Italy</json:string>
<json:string>E-mail: zarone@tin.it</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<subject>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>dimensional accuracy</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>implant</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>implant angulation</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>impression</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>impression accuracy</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>impression coping</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>impression material</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>impression technique</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>parallel implants</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>prosthodontics</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
<articleId>
<json:string>CID167</json:string>
</articleId>
<arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-7PPDQRN5-2</arkIstex>
<language>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre>
<json:string>article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>Background: With regard to implant‐supported prostheses, to date no technique has been proven to guarantee a completely passive fit of prosthetic frameworks. Several clinical variables may affect the precision of impressions, particularly in the presence of implants.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators>
<score>7.444</score>
<pdfWordCount>6675</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>44566</pdfCharCount>
<pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageCount>14</pdfPageCount>
<pdfPageSize>585 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative>
<abstractWordCount>37</abstractWordCount>
<abstractCharCount>267</abstractCharCount>
<keywordCount>10</keywordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>Effect of Implant Angulation, Connection Length, and Impression Material on the Dimensional Accuracy of Implant Impressions: An In Vitro Comparative Study</title>
<pmid>
<json:string>19438937</json:string>
</pmid>
<genre>
<json:string>article</json:string>
</genre>
<host>
<title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title>
<language>
<json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string>
</doi>
<issn>
<json:string>1523-0899</json:string>
</issn>
<eissn>
<json:string>1708-8208</json:string>
</eissn>
<publisherId>
<json:string>CID</json:string>
</publisherId>
<volume>12</volume>
<pages>
<first>e63</first>
<last>e76</last>
<total>14</total>
</pages>
<genre>
<json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
</host>
<namedEntities>
<unitex>
<date>
<json:string>2010</json:string>
</date>
<geogName></geogName>
<orgName>
<json:string>South Jordan, UT, USA</json:string>
<json:string>SPSS Inc., Chicago</json:string>
<json:string>Dental Creations Ltd.</json:string>
<json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string>
<json:string>Department of Dentistry, University</json:string>
<json:string>GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan</json:string>
<json:string>Whip Mix Corporation, Louisville</json:string>
<json:string>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</json:string>
<json:string>Department of Prosthodontics, University</json:string>
</orgName>
<orgName_funder></orgName_funder>
<orgName_provider></orgName_provider>
<persName>
<json:string>Vita Salute</json:string>
<json:string>Felice Gherlone</json:string>
<json:string>Tray Adhesive</json:string>
<json:string>Carl Zeiss</json:string>
<json:string>Badia Polesine</json:string>
<json:string>Fernando Zarone</json:string>
<json:string>Gaetano Calesini</json:string>
<json:string>Sedda</json:string>
<json:string>Error Total</json:string>
<json:string>Via S. Pansini</json:string>
</persName>
<placeName>
<json:string>Naples</json:string>
<json:string>TX</json:string>
<json:string>San Raffaele</json:string>
<json:string>Germany</json:string>
<json:string>Waco</json:string>
<json:string>NC</json:string>
<json:string>Cincinnati</json:string>
<json:string>Milan</json:string>
<json:string>USA</json:string>
<json:string>Pottstown</json:string>
<json:string>Rome</json:string>
<json:string>Yorkshire</json:string>
<json:string>Greenville</json:string>
<json:string>Italy</json:string>
<json:string>OH</json:string>
<json:string>PA</json:string>
</placeName>
<ref_url></ref_url>
<ref_bibl></ref_bibl>
<bibl></bibl>
</unitex>
</namedEntities>
<ark>
<json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-7PPDQRN5-2</json:string>
</ark>
<categories>
<wos>
<json:string>1 - science</json:string>
<json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string>
</wos>
<scienceMetrix>
<json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string>
<json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string>
</scienceMetrix>
<scopus>
<json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string>
</scopus>
</categories>
<publicationDate>2010</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2010</copyrightDate>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00167.x</json:string>
</doi>
<id>190E96DE7AA64C2BA5B0A364D3F7AC0066D157BE</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext>
<json:item>
<extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/190E96DE7AA64C2BA5B0A364D3F7AC0066D157BE/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/190E96DE7AA64C2BA5B0A364D3F7AC0066D157BE/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/190E96DE7AA64C2BA5B0A364D3F7AC0066D157BE/fulltext/tei">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title level="a" type="main">Effect of Implant Angulation, Connection Length, and Impression Material on the Dimensional Accuracy of Implant Impressions: An In Vitro Comparative Study</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<availability>
<licence>© 2009, Copyright the Authors. Journal Compilation © 2010, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</licence>
</availability>
<date type="published" when="2010-05"></date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt>
<note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note>
<note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct type="article">
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">Effect of Implant Angulation, Connection Length, and Impression Material on the Dimensional Accuracy of Implant Impressions: An In Vitro Comparative Study</title>
<title level="a" type="short">Implant Angulation, Connection Length, and Impression Material</title>
<author xml:id="author-0000">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Roberto</forename>
<surname>Sorrentino</surname>
<roleName type="degree">DDS, MSc, PhD</roleName>
</persName>
<affiliation>Doctor, Department of Prosthodontics, University “Federico II,” Naples, Italy;
<address>
<country key="IT"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0001">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Enrico Felice</forename>
<surname>Gherlone</surname>
<roleName type="degree">MD, DDS</roleName>
</persName>
<affiliation>professor, Department of Dentistry, University “Vita Salute San Raffaele,” Milan, Italy;
<address>
<country key="IT"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0002">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Gaetano</forename>
<surname>Calesini</surname>
<roleName type="degree">MD, DDS</roleName>
</persName>
<affiliation>private practice, Rome, Italy;
<address>
<country key="IT"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0003" role="corresp">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Fernando</forename>
<surname>Zarone</surname>
<roleName type="degree">MD, DDS</roleName>
</persName>
<affiliation>professor, Department of Prosthodontics, University “Federico II,” Naples, Italy
<address>
<country key="IT"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>Prof. Fernando Zarone, A.O.U. “Federico II,” Dipartimento di Scienze Odontostomatologiche e Maxillo‐Facciali, Ed. 14, Via S. Pansini, 5, 80131 Napoli, Italy; e‐mail: zarone@tin.it</affiliation>
</author>
<idno type="istex">190E96DE7AA64C2BA5B0A364D3F7AC0066D157BE</idno>
<idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-7PPDQRN5-2</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00167.x</idno>
<idno type="unit">CID167</idno>
<idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID167.pdf</idno>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title>
<title level="j" type="sub">Immediate Loading of Dental Implants</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title>
<idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno>
<idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno>
<idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2010.12.issue-s1</idno>
<idno type="product">CID</idno>
<idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">12</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="e63">e63</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="e76">e76</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">14</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2010-05"></date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<abstract xml:lang="en" style="main">
<head>ABSTRACT</head>
<p>
<hi rend="bold">Background:</hi>
With regard to implant‐supported prostheses, to date no technique has been proven to guarantee a completely passive fit of prosthetic frameworks. Several clinical variables may affect the precision of impressions, particularly in the presence of implants.</p>
<p>
<hi rend="bold">Purpose:</hi>
To compare the accuracy of implant impressions made with different materials, lengths of impression coping connections, and not parallel position of the implants.</p>
<p>
<hi rend="bold">Materials and Methods:</hi>
A calibrated testing device allowing reproducible standardized positions was used. Two control groups of master models and eight experimental groups with predetermined undercuts were used to make addition silicon and polyether implant impressions by means of the open‐tray pick‐up technique. Four reference distances were evaluated on each study cast by using a profile projector and a standardized measurement protocol. The data were statistically analyzed by means of three‐factor analysis of variance.</p>
<p>
<hi rend="bold">Results:</hi>
The impressions made in the presence of angulated implants were significantly less accurate than the ones made with parallel implants. The tested addition silicon resulted advantageous in presence of nonparallel implants whereas the polyether achieved the best results with parallel implants and standard impression copings.</p>
<p>
<hi rend="bold">Conclusions:</hi>
The angulation of the implants may cause strains of impressions, probably because of the higher forces required for the impression removal. Moreover, undercuts negatively affected the impression accuracy. More accurate casts were obtained using the tested addition silicon in the presence of nonparallel implants and using a standard length connection of the copings in the presence of parallel implants, respectively.</p>
</abstract>
<textClass>
<keywords xml:lang="en">
<term xml:id="k1">dimensional accuracy</term>
<term xml:id="k2">implant</term>
<term xml:id="k3">implant angulation</term>
<term xml:id="k4">impression</term>
<term xml:id="k5">impression accuracy</term>
<term xml:id="k6">impression coping</term>
<term xml:id="k7">impression material</term>
<term xml:id="k8">impression technique</term>
<term xml:id="k9">parallel implants</term>
<term xml:id="k10">prosthodontics</term>
</keywords>
<keywords rend="tocHeading1">
<term>ARTICLES</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en"></language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item>
<extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/190E96DE7AA64C2BA5B0A364D3F7AC0066D157BE/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata>
<istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body">
<istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:document>
<component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en">
<header>
<publicationMeta level="product">
<publisherInfo>
<publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName>
<publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc>
</publisherInfo>
<doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi>
<issn type="print">1523-0899</issn>
<issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn>
<idGroup>
<id type="product" value="CID"></id>
<id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id>
</idGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title>
</titleGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="part" position="05000">
<doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.2010.12.issue-s1</doi>
<titleGroup>
<title type="specialIssueTitle">Immediate Loading of Dental Implants</title>
</titleGroup>
<numberingGroup>
<numbering type="journalVolume" number="12">12</numbering>
<numbering type="supplement">s1</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<coverDate startDate="2010-05">May 2010</coverDate>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="9" status="forIssue">
<doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00167.x</doi>
<idGroup>
<id type="unit" value="CID167"></id>
</idGroup>
<countGroup>
<count type="pageTotal" number="14"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title>
</titleGroup>
<copyright>© 2009, Copyright the Authors. Journal Compilation © 2010, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright>
<eventGroup>
<event type="firstOnline" date="2009-05-12"></event>
<event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2010-05-24"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.6 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-05-25"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event>
</eventGroup>
<numberingGroup>
<numbering type="pageFirst">e63</numbering>
<numbering type="pageLast">e76</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<correspondenceTo>Prof. Fernando Zarone, A.O.U. “Federico II,” Dipartimento di Scienze Odontostomatologiche e Maxillo‐Facciali, Ed. 14, Via S. Pansini, 5, 80131 Napoli, Italy; e‐mail:
<email>zarone@tin.it</email>
</correspondenceTo>
<linkGroup>
<link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID167.pdf"></link>
</linkGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<contentMeta>
<countGroup>
<count type="figureTotal" number="8"></count>
<count type="tableTotal" number="6"></count>
<count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count>
<count type="referenceTotal" number="67"></count>
<count type="wordTotal" number="7842"></count>
<count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count>
<count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="main">Effect of Implant Angulation, Connection Length, and Impression Material on the Dimensional Accuracy of Implant Impressions: An In Vitro Comparative Study</title>
<title type="shortAuthors">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Volume *, Number *, 2009</title>
<title type="short">Implant Angulation, Connection Length, and Impression Material</title>
</titleGroup>
<creators>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1">
<personName>
<givenNames>Roberto</givenNames>
<familyName>Sorrentino</familyName>
<degrees>DDS, MSc, PhD</degrees>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2">
<personName>
<givenNames>Enrico Felice</givenNames>
<familyName>Gherlone</familyName>
<degrees>MD, DDS</degrees>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3">
<personName>
<givenNames>Gaetano</givenNames>
<familyName>Calesini</familyName>
<degrees>MD, DDS</degrees>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a4" corresponding="yes">
<personName>
<givenNames>Fernando</givenNames>
<familyName>Zarone</familyName>
<degrees>MD, DDS</degrees>
</personName>
</creator>
</creators>
<affiliationGroup>
<affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="IT">
<unparsedAffiliation>Doctor, Department of Prosthodontics, University “Federico II,” Naples, Italy;</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="IT">
<unparsedAffiliation>professor, Department of Dentistry, University “Vita Salute San Raffaele,” Milan, Italy;</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="IT">
<unparsedAffiliation>private practice, Rome, Italy;</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="IT">
<unparsedAffiliation>professor, Department of Prosthodontics, University “Federico II,” Naples, Italy</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
</affiliationGroup>
<keywordGroup xml:lang="en">
<keyword xml:id="k1">dimensional accuracy</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k2">implant</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k3">implant angulation</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k4">impression</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k5">impression accuracy</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k6">impression coping</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k7">impression material</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k8">impression technique</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k9">parallel implants</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k10">prosthodontics</keyword>
</keywordGroup>
<abstractGroup>
<abstract type="main" xml:lang="en">
<title type="main">ABSTRACT</title>
<p>
<b>Background:</b>
With regard to implant‐supported prostheses, to date no technique has been proven to guarantee a completely passive fit of prosthetic frameworks. Several clinical variables may affect the precision of impressions, particularly in the presence of implants.</p>
<p>
<b>Purpose:</b>
To compare the accuracy of implant impressions made with different materials, lengths of impression coping connections, and not parallel position of the implants.</p>
<p>
<b>Materials and Methods:</b>
A calibrated testing device allowing reproducible standardized positions was used. Two control groups of master models and eight experimental groups with predetermined undercuts were used to make addition silicon and polyether implant impressions by means of the open‐tray pick‐up technique. Four reference distances were evaluated on each study cast by using a profile projector and a standardized measurement protocol. The data were statistically analyzed by means of three‐factor analysis of variance.</p>
<p>
<b>Results:</b>
The impressions made in the presence of angulated implants were significantly less accurate than the ones made with parallel implants. The tested addition silicon resulted advantageous in presence of nonparallel implants whereas the polyether achieved the best results with parallel implants and standard impression copings.</p>
<p>
<b>Conclusions:</b>
The angulation of the implants may cause strains of impressions, probably because of the higher forces required for the impression removal. Moreover, undercuts negatively affected the impression accuracy. More accurate casts were obtained using the tested addition silicon in the presence of nonparallel implants and using a standard length connection of the copings in the presence of parallel implants, respectively.</p>
</abstract>
</abstractGroup>
</contentMeta>
</header>
</component>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6">
<titleInfo lang="en">
<title>Effect of Implant Angulation, Connection Length, and Impression Material on the Dimensional Accuracy of Implant Impressions: An In Vitro Comparative Study</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en">
<title>Implant Angulation, Connection Length, and Impression Material</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en">
<title>Effect of Implant Angulation, Connection Length, and Impression Material on the Dimensional Accuracy of Implant Impressions: An In Vitro Comparative Study</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Roberto</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Sorrentino</namePart>
<namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MSc, PhD</namePart>
<affiliation>Doctor, Department of Prosthodontics, University “Federico II,” Naples, Italy;</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Enrico Felice</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Gherlone</namePart>
<namePart type="termsOfAddress">MD, DDS</namePart>
<affiliation>professor, Department of Dentistry, University “Vita Salute San Raffaele,” Milan, Italy;</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Gaetano</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Calesini</namePart>
<namePart type="termsOfAddress">MD, DDS</namePart>
<affiliation>private practice, Rome, Italy;</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Fernando</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Zarone</namePart>
<namePart type="termsOfAddress">MD, DDS</namePart>
<affiliation>professor, Department of Prosthodontics, University “Federico II,” Naples, Italy</affiliation>
<affiliation>E-mail: zarone@tin.it</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2010-05</dateIssued>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<extent unit="figures">8</extent>
<extent unit="tables">6</extent>
<extent unit="formulas">0</extent>
<extent unit="references">67</extent>
<extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent>
<extent unit="words">7842</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract>Background: With regard to implant‐supported prostheses, to date no technique has been proven to guarantee a completely passive fit of prosthetic frameworks. Several clinical variables may affect the precision of impressions, particularly in the presence of implants.</abstract>
<abstract>Purpose: To compare the accuracy of implant impressions made with different materials, lengths of impression coping connections, and not parallel position of the implants.</abstract>
<abstract>Materials and Methods: A calibrated testing device allowing reproducible standardized positions was used. Two control groups of master models and eight experimental groups with predetermined undercuts were used to make addition silicon and polyether implant impressions by means of the open‐tray pick‐up technique. Four reference distances were evaluated on each study cast by using a profile projector and a standardized measurement protocol. The data were statistically analyzed by means of three‐factor analysis of variance.</abstract>
<abstract>Results: The impressions made in the presence of angulated implants were significantly less accurate than the ones made with parallel implants. The tested addition silicon resulted advantageous in presence of nonparallel implants whereas the polyether achieved the best results with parallel implants and standard impression copings.</abstract>
<abstract>Conclusions: The angulation of the implants may cause strains of impressions, probably because of the higher forces required for the impression removal. Moreover, undercuts negatively affected the impression accuracy. More accurate casts were obtained using the tested addition silicon in the presence of nonparallel implants and using a standard length connection of the copings in the presence of parallel implants, respectively.</abstract>
<subject lang="en">
<genre>keywords</genre>
<topic>dimensional accuracy</topic>
<topic>implant</topic>
<topic>implant angulation</topic>
<topic>impression</topic>
<topic>impression accuracy</topic>
<topic>impression coping</topic>
<topic>impression material</topic>
<topic>impression technique</topic>
<topic>parallel implants</topic>
<topic>prosthodontics</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre>
<identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier>
<part>
<date>2010</date>
<detail type="title">
<title>Immediate Loading of Dental Implants</title>
</detail>
<detail type="volume">
<caption>vol.</caption>
<number>12</number>
</detail>
<detail type="supplement">
<caption>Suppl. no.</caption>
<number>s1</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages">
<start>e63</start>
<end>e76</end>
<total>14</total>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">190E96DE7AA64C2BA5B0A364D3F7AC0066D157BE</identifier>
<identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-7PPDQRN5-2</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00167.x</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">CID167</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2009, Copyright the Authors. Journal Compilation © 2010, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</accessCondition>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
<json:item>
<extension>json</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/json</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/190E96DE7AA64C2BA5B0A364D3F7AC0066D157BE/metadata/json</uri>
</json:item>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000C33 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000C33 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:190E96DE7AA64C2BA5B0A364D3F7AC0066D157BE
   |texte=   Effect of Implant Angulation, Connection Length, and Impression Material on the Dimensional Accuracy of Implant Impressions: An In Vitro Comparative Study
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022