Ten‐year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Brånemark in full edentulism
Identifieur interne : 000A80 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000A79; suivant : 000A81Ten‐year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Brånemark in full edentulism
Auteurs : P. Br Nemark ; B. Svensson ; D. Van SteenbergheSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 1995-12.
Abstract
A series of 1.56 consecutive fully edentulous patients were rehabilitated by means of fixed prostheses on either 4 or 6 screw‐shaped titanium implants. This retrospective study calculated survival rates for both prostheses and individual implants. Only patients with a 10‐year follow‐up were considered. The implant lengths were 10 (90%) or 7 mm. They were all inserted after pretapping. In the mandible 13 and 59 prostheses were installed on respectively 4 and 6 implants. In the upper jaw the respective numbers were 14 and 70. Both groups (4 versus 6 implants) were age‐ and gender‐matched. A reduced jaw bone volume was the major reason for limiting the number of implants to 4. Although a tendency existed for an increased failure rate in patients with only 4 implants, the survival rate for both individual implants and prostheses was the same in both groups at the end of the 10‐year observation period. The present tendency of some clinicians to install as many implants as possible in full edentulism should be seriously questioned.
Url:
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060405.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:15A9F7B974D45615BAF6EFE3FCC9DF9696535EBFLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Ten‐year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Brånemark in full edentulism</title><author><name sortKey="Br Nemark, P" sort="Br Nemark, P" uniqKey="Br Nemark P" first="P." last="Br Nemark">P. Br Nemark</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Göteborg, Sweden;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Svensson, B" sort="Svensson, B" uniqKey="Svensson B" first="B." last="Svensson">B. Svensson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Göteborg, Sweden;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D." last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:15A9F7B974D45615BAF6EFE3FCC9DF9696535EBF</idno><date when="1995" year="1995">1995</date><idno type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060405.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/15A9F7B974D45615BAF6EFE3FCC9DF9696535EBF/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000A80</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000A80</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Ten‐year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Brånemark in full edentulism</title><author><name sortKey="Br Nemark, P" sort="Br Nemark, P" uniqKey="Br Nemark P" first="P." last="Br Nemark">P. Br Nemark</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Göteborg, Sweden;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Svensson, B" sort="Svensson, B" uniqKey="Svensson B" first="B." last="Svensson">B. Svensson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Göteborg, Sweden;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D." last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="227">227</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="231">231</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1995-12">1995-12</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">A series of 1.56 consecutive fully edentulous patients were rehabilitated by means of fixed prostheses on either 4 or 6 screw‐shaped titanium implants. This retrospective study calculated survival rates for both prostheses and individual implants. Only patients with a 10‐year follow‐up were considered. The implant lengths were 10 (90%) or 7 mm. They were all inserted after pretapping. In the mandible 13 and 59 prostheses were installed on respectively 4 and 6 implants. In the upper jaw the respective numbers were 14 and 70. Both groups (4 versus 6 implants) were age‐ and gender‐matched. A reduced jaw bone volume was the major reason for limiting the number of implants to 4. Although a tendency existed for an increased failure rate in patients with only 4 implants, the survival rate for both individual implants and prostheses was the same in both groups at the end of the 10‐year observation period. The present tendency of some clinicians to install as many implants as possible in full edentulism should be seriously questioned.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>P.‐I. Brånemark</name><affiliations><json:string>Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Göteborg, Sweden;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>B. Svensson</name><affiliations><json:string>Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Göteborg, Sweden;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>D. Van Steenberghe</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>osseointegration</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>full prosthesis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>number of implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implant</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR060405</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-W4NPKH7Q-9</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>A series of 1.56 consecutive fully edentulous patients were rehabilitated by means of fixed prostheses on either 4 or 6 screw‐shaped titanium implants. This retrospective study calculated survival rates for both prostheses and individual implants. Only patients with a 10‐year follow‐up were considered. The implant lengths were 10 (90%) or 7 mm. They were all inserted after pretapping. In the mandible 13 and 59 prostheses were installed on respectively 4 and 6 implants. In the upper jaw the respective numbers were 14 and 70. Both groups (4 versus 6 implants) were age‐ and gender‐matched. A reduced jaw bone volume was the major reason for limiting the number of implants to 4. Although a tendency existed for an increased failure rate in patients with only 4 implants, the survival rate for both individual implants and prostheses was the same in both groups at the end of the 10‐year observation period. The present tendency of some clinicians to install as many implants as possible in full edentulism should be seriously questioned.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>4.078</score><pdfWordCount>0</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>0</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>5</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>567 x 785 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>169</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1041</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Ten‐year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Brånemark in full edentulism</title><pmid><json:string>8603114</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>6</volume><issue>4</issue><pages><first>227</first><last>231</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1995</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName></persName><placeName></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-W4NPKH7Q-9</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string><json:string>4 - otorhinolaryngologie. stomatologie</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1995</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060405.x</json:string></doi><id>15A9F7B974D45615BAF6EFE3FCC9DF9696535EBF</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/15A9F7B974D45615BAF6EFE3FCC9DF9696535EBF/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>ocr</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/ocr</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/15A9F7B974D45615BAF6EFE3FCC9DF9696535EBF/fulltext/ocr</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/15A9F7B974D45615BAF6EFE3FCC9DF9696535EBF/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/15A9F7B974D45615BAF6EFE3FCC9DF9696535EBF/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Ten‐year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Brånemark in full edentulism</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1995-12"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Ten‐year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Brånemark in full edentulism</title><title level="a" type="short">Survival rates of fixed prostheses</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">P.‐I.</forename><surname>Brånemark</surname></persName><affiliation>Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Göteborg, Sweden;<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">B.</forename><surname>Svensson</surname></persName><affiliation>Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Göteborg, Sweden;<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">D.</forename><surname>Van Steenberghe</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">15A9F7B974D45615BAF6EFE3FCC9DF9696535EBF</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-W4NPKH7Q-9</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060405.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR060405</idno><idno type="supplier"></idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR060405.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.1995.6.issue-4</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="227">227</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="231">231</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1995-12"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p>A series of 1.56 consecutive fully edentulous patients were rehabilitated by means of fixed prostheses on either 4 or 6 screw‐shaped titanium implants. This retrospective study calculated survival rates for both prostheses and individual implants. Only patients with a 10‐year follow‐up were considered. The implant lengths were 10 (90%) or 7 mm. They were all inserted after pretapping. In the mandible 13 and 59 prostheses were installed on respectively 4 and 6 implants. In the upper jaw the respective numbers were 14 and 70. Both groups (4 versus 6 implants) were age‐ and gender‐matched. A reduced jaw bone volume was the major reason for limiting the number of implants to 4. Although a tendency existed for an increased failure rate in patients with only 4 implants, the survival rate for both individual implants and prostheses was the same in both groups at the end of the 10‐year observation period. The present tendency of some clinicians to install as many implants as possible in full edentulism should be seriously questioned.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">osseointegration</term><term xml:id="k2">full prosthesis</term><term xml:id="k3">number of implants</term><term xml:id="k4">dental implant</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change>undefined</change><change>[object Object]</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/15A9F7B974D45615BAF6EFE3FCC9DF9696535EBF/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley component found"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisherName><publisherLoc>Copenhagen</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="12004"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.1995.6.issue-4</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="6">6</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="4">4</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="1995-12">December 1995</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0022700" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060405.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR060405"></id><id type="supplier" value=""></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2002-06-27"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2002-06-27"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:Header result:Header" date="2010-03-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="227">227</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="231">231</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>D. van Steenberghe, The Professor P‐I. Brånemark Chair in Osseointegration, Department of Periodontology, Catholic University of Leuven, Capucijnenvoer, 7,B‐3000 Leuven, Belgium</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR060405.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication 23 January 1995</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Ten‐year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Brånemark in full edentulism</title><title type="shortAuthors">Brånemark et al.</title><title type="short">Survival rates of fixed prostheses</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>P.‐I.</givenNames><familyName>Brånemark</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>B.</givenNames><familyName>Svensson</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>D.</givenNames><familyName>Van Steenberghe</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Göteborg, Sweden;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">osseointegration</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">full prosthesis</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">number of implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">dental implant</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>A series of 1.56 consecutive fully edentulous patients were rehabilitated by means of fixed prostheses on either 4 or 6 screw‐shaped titanium implants. This retrospective study calculated survival rates for both prostheses and individual implants. Only patients with a 10‐year follow‐up were considered. The implant lengths were 10 (90%) or 7 mm. They were all inserted after pretapping. In the mandible 13 and 59 prostheses were installed on respectively 4 and 6 implants. In the upper jaw the respective numbers were 14 and 70. Both groups (4 versus 6 implants) were age‐ and gender‐matched. A reduced jaw bone volume was the major reason for limiting the number of implants to 4. Although a tendency existed for an increased failure rate in patients with only 4 implants, the survival rate for both individual implants and prostheses was the same in both groups at the end of the 10‐year observation period. The present tendency of some clinicians to install as many implants as possible in full edentulism should be seriously questioned.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Ten‐year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Brånemark in full edentulism</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Survival rates of fixed prostheses</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Ten‐year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Brånemark in full edentulism</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">P.‐I.</namePart><namePart type="family">Brånemark</namePart><affiliation>Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Göteborg, Sweden;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">B.</namePart><namePart type="family">Svensson</namePart><affiliation>Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Göteborg, Sweden;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">D.</namePart><namePart type="family">Van Steenberghe</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Copenhagen</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1995-12</dateIssued><edition>Accepted for publication 23 January 1995</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1995</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">A series of 1.56 consecutive fully edentulous patients were rehabilitated by means of fixed prostheses on either 4 or 6 screw‐shaped titanium implants. This retrospective study calculated survival rates for both prostheses and individual implants. Only patients with a 10‐year follow‐up were considered. The implant lengths were 10 (90%) or 7 mm. They were all inserted after pretapping. In the mandible 13 and 59 prostheses were installed on respectively 4 and 6 implants. In the upper jaw the respective numbers were 14 and 70. Both groups (4 versus 6 implants) were age‐ and gender‐matched. A reduced jaw bone volume was the major reason for limiting the number of implants to 4. Although a tendency existed for an increased failure rate in patients with only 4 implants, the survival rate for both individual implants and prostheses was the same in both groups at the end of the 10‐year observation period. The present tendency of some clinicians to install as many implants as possible in full edentulism should be seriously questioned.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>osseointegration</topic><topic>full prosthesis</topic><topic>number of implants</topic><topic>dental implant</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>1995</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>6</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>227</start><end>231</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">15A9F7B974D45615BAF6EFE3FCC9DF9696535EBF</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-W4NPKH7Q-9</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060405.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR060405</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Munksgaard International Publishers</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/15A9F7B974D45615BAF6EFE3FCC9DF9696535EBF/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A80 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000A80 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:15A9F7B974D45615BAF6EFE3FCC9DF9696535EBF
|texte= Ten‐year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Brånemark in full edentulism
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |