Influence of controlled immediate loading and implant design on peri‐implant bone formation
Identifieur interne : 000A20 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000A19; suivant : 000A21Influence of controlled immediate loading and implant design on peri‐implant bone formation
Auteurs : Katleen Vandamme ; Ignace Naert ; Liesbet Geris ; Jozef Vander Sloten ; Robert Puers ; Joke DuyckSource :
- Journal of Clinical Periodontology [ 0303-6979 ] ; 2007-02.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Appositional bone formation, Belgium, Biomedical materials research, Blackwell munksgaard, Boic, Bone, Bone area, Bone area fraction, Bone chamber, Bone chamber model, Bone formation, Bone fraction, Bone growth, Bone marrow, Bone organization, Bone tissue, Bone tissue formation, Bone trabeculae, Brous encapsulation, Central implant, Clin periodontol, Clinical orthopaedics, Clinical periodontology, Computer screen, Cylindrical implant, Cylindrical implants, Dental implants, Dentistry, Different tissue response, Direct contact, Duyck, Early osteogenesis, Early wound healing, Effect loading condition, Electrical engineering, Endosseous, Endosseous implants, Endosseous wound healing, Experimental study, Extraction sites, Extraction socket, Force transfer, Fracture, Fracture healing, Hard tissue formation, Harvest number, Healing, Higher quantity, Histological, Histological section, Histological sections, Histomorphometric measurements, Host bone, Immediate implant loading, Immediate loading, Implant, Implant contact, Implant dentistry, Implant design, Implant displacement, Implant geometry effect, Implant healing, Implant interface, Implant surface, Implant surroundings, Implants research, Inner bone chamber, Interface, International journal, Journal compilation, Katholieke universiteit leuven, Leuven, Light microscope, Loading, Loading condition, Loading cycles, Loading device, Loading effect, Loading experiments, Loading history, Loading parameters, Loading protocol, Loading session, Loading sessions, Mandibular overdentures, Marrow spaces, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Mechanical conditions, Mechanical loading, Mechanical stability, Mechanical stimulus, Mesenchymal cells, Micromotion, Mineralized, Mineralized bone, Mineralized bone fraction, Model analysis, Munksgaard, Native cancellous bone, Oral implantology, Oral pathology, Osseointegration, Outer bone chamber, Physiological loading, Picrofuchsin stain, Pilot study, Positive effect, Preliminary study, Present study, Primary stability, Proportional odds, Research flanders, Same bone chamber, Screw design, Secondary stability, Stress distribution, Surface characteristics, Test conditions, Tissue area, Tissue area fraction, Tissue composition, Tissue differentiation, Tissue formation, Tissue growth, Tissue mineralization, Tissue response, Titanium, Titanium implant, Titanium implants, Tooth extraction sites, Trabecula, Trabecular, Trabecular bone, Undisturbed healing, Vandamme, Vander sloten, Variable loading condition, Vivo loading.
- Teeft :
- Appositional bone formation, Belgium, Biomedical materials research, Blackwell munksgaard, Boic, Bone, Bone area, Bone area fraction, Bone chamber, Bone chamber model, Bone formation, Bone fraction, Bone growth, Bone marrow, Bone organization, Bone tissue, Bone tissue formation, Bone trabeculae, Brous encapsulation, Central implant, Clin periodontol, Clinical orthopaedics, Clinical periodontology, Computer screen, Cylindrical implant, Cylindrical implants, Dental implants, Dentistry, Different tissue response, Direct contact, Duyck, Early osteogenesis, Early wound healing, Effect loading condition, Electrical engineering, Endosseous, Endosseous implants, Endosseous wound healing, Experimental study, Extraction sites, Extraction socket, Force transfer, Fracture, Fracture healing, Hard tissue formation, Harvest number, Healing, Higher quantity, Histological, Histological section, Histological sections, Histomorphometric measurements, Host bone, Immediate implant loading, Immediate loading, Implant, Implant contact, Implant dentistry, Implant design, Implant displacement, Implant geometry effect, Implant healing, Implant interface, Implant surface, Implant surroundings, Implants research, Inner bone chamber, Interface, International journal, Journal compilation, Katholieke universiteit leuven, Leuven, Light microscope, Loading, Loading condition, Loading cycles, Loading device, Loading effect, Loading experiments, Loading history, Loading parameters, Loading protocol, Loading session, Loading sessions, Mandibular overdentures, Marrow spaces, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Mechanical conditions, Mechanical loading, Mechanical stability, Mechanical stimulus, Mesenchymal cells, Micromotion, Mineralized, Mineralized bone, Mineralized bone fraction, Model analysis, Munksgaard, Native cancellous bone, Oral implantology, Oral pathology, Osseointegration, Outer bone chamber, Physiological loading, Picrofuchsin stain, Pilot study, Positive effect, Preliminary study, Present study, Primary stability, Proportional odds, Research flanders, Same bone chamber, Screw design, Secondary stability, Stress distribution, Surface characteristics, Test conditions, Tissue area, Tissue area fraction, Tissue composition, Tissue differentiation, Tissue formation, Tissue growth, Tissue mineralization, Tissue response, Titanium, Titanium implant, Titanium implants, Tooth extraction sites, Trabecula, Trabecular, Trabecular bone, Undisturbed healing, Vandamme, Vander sloten, Variable loading condition, Vivo loading.
Abstract
Aim: Tissue formation at the implant interface is known to be sensitive to mechanical stimuli. The aim of the study was to compare the bone formation around immediately loaded versus unloaded implants in two different implant macro‐designs.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.01014.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:1488BDBEF0DCA79360EF1967A96714FC90512589Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Influence of controlled immediate loading and implant design on peri‐implant bone formation</title><author><name sortKey="Vandamme, Katleen" sort="Vandamme, Katleen" uniqKey="Vandamme K" first="Katleen" last="Vandamme">Katleen Vandamme</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Naert, Ignace" sort="Naert, Ignace" uniqKey="Naert I" first="Ignace" last="Naert">Ignace Naert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Geris, Liesbet" sort="Geris, Liesbet" uniqKey="Geris L" first="Liesbet" last="Geris">Liesbet Geris</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Division of Biomechanics and Engineering Design, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sloten, Jozef Vander" sort="Sloten, Jozef Vander" uniqKey="Sloten J" first="Jozef Vander" last="Sloten">Jozef Vander Sloten</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Division of Biomechanics and Engineering Design, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Puers, Robert" sort="Puers, Robert" uniqKey="Puers R" first="Robert" last="Puers">Robert Puers</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Electrical Engineering–ESAT‐MICAS, K.U.Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Duyck, Joke" sort="Duyck, Joke" uniqKey="Duyck J" first="Joke" last="Duyck">Joke Duyck</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:1488BDBEF0DCA79360EF1967A96714FC90512589</idno><date when="2007" year="2007">2007</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.01014.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/1488BDBEF0DCA79360EF1967A96714FC90512589/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000A20</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000A20</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Influence of controlled immediate loading and implant design on peri‐implant bone formation</title><author><name sortKey="Vandamme, Katleen" sort="Vandamme, Katleen" uniqKey="Vandamme K" first="Katleen" last="Vandamme">Katleen Vandamme</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Naert, Ignace" sort="Naert, Ignace" uniqKey="Naert I" first="Ignace" last="Naert">Ignace Naert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Geris, Liesbet" sort="Geris, Liesbet" uniqKey="Geris L" first="Liesbet" last="Geris">Liesbet Geris</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Division of Biomechanics and Engineering Design, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sloten, Jozef Vander" sort="Sloten, Jozef Vander" uniqKey="Sloten J" first="Jozef Vander" last="Sloten">Jozef Vander Sloten</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Division of Biomechanics and Engineering Design, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Puers, Robert" sort="Puers, Robert" uniqKey="Puers R" first="Robert" last="Puers">Robert Puers</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Electrical Engineering–ESAT‐MICAS, K.U.Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Duyck, Joke" sort="Duyck, Joke" uniqKey="Duyck J" first="Joke" last="Duyck">Joke Duyck</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-051X</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">34</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="172">172</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="181">181</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-02">2007-02</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Appositional bone formation</term><term>Belgium</term><term>Biomedical materials research</term><term>Blackwell munksgaard</term><term>Boic</term><term>Bone</term><term>Bone area</term><term>Bone area fraction</term><term>Bone chamber</term><term>Bone chamber model</term><term>Bone formation</term><term>Bone fraction</term><term>Bone growth</term><term>Bone marrow</term><term>Bone organization</term><term>Bone tissue</term><term>Bone tissue formation</term><term>Bone trabeculae</term><term>Brous encapsulation</term><term>Central implant</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical orthopaedics</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Computer screen</term><term>Cylindrical implant</term><term>Cylindrical implants</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Different tissue response</term><term>Direct contact</term><term>Duyck</term><term>Early osteogenesis</term><term>Early wound healing</term><term>Effect loading condition</term><term>Electrical engineering</term><term>Endosseous</term><term>Endosseous implants</term><term>Endosseous wound healing</term><term>Experimental study</term><term>Extraction sites</term><term>Extraction socket</term><term>Force transfer</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Fracture healing</term><term>Hard tissue formation</term><term>Harvest number</term><term>Healing</term><term>Higher quantity</term><term>Histological</term><term>Histological section</term><term>Histological sections</term><term>Histomorphometric measurements</term><term>Host bone</term><term>Immediate implant loading</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant contact</term><term>Implant dentistry</term><term>Implant design</term><term>Implant displacement</term><term>Implant geometry effect</term><term>Implant healing</term><term>Implant interface</term><term>Implant surface</term><term>Implant surroundings</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Inner bone chamber</term><term>Interface</term><term>International journal</term><term>Journal compilation</term><term>Katholieke universiteit leuven</term><term>Leuven</term><term>Light microscope</term><term>Loading</term><term>Loading condition</term><term>Loading cycles</term><term>Loading device</term><term>Loading effect</term><term>Loading experiments</term><term>Loading history</term><term>Loading parameters</term><term>Loading protocol</term><term>Loading session</term><term>Loading sessions</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Marrow spaces</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Mechanical conditions</term><term>Mechanical loading</term><term>Mechanical stability</term><term>Mechanical stimulus</term><term>Mesenchymal cells</term><term>Micromotion</term><term>Mineralized</term><term>Mineralized bone</term><term>Mineralized bone fraction</term><term>Model analysis</term><term>Munksgaard</term><term>Native cancellous bone</term><term>Oral implantology</term><term>Oral pathology</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Outer bone chamber</term><term>Physiological loading</term><term>Picrofuchsin stain</term><term>Pilot study</term><term>Positive effect</term><term>Preliminary study</term><term>Present study</term><term>Primary stability</term><term>Proportional odds</term><term>Research flanders</term><term>Same bone chamber</term><term>Screw design</term><term>Secondary stability</term><term>Stress distribution</term><term>Surface characteristics</term><term>Test conditions</term><term>Tissue area</term><term>Tissue area fraction</term><term>Tissue composition</term><term>Tissue differentiation</term><term>Tissue formation</term><term>Tissue growth</term><term>Tissue mineralization</term><term>Tissue response</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium implant</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Tooth extraction sites</term><term>Trabecula</term><term>Trabecular</term><term>Trabecular bone</term><term>Undisturbed healing</term><term>Vandamme</term><term>Vander sloten</term><term>Variable loading condition</term><term>Vivo loading</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Appositional bone formation</term><term>Belgium</term><term>Biomedical materials research</term><term>Blackwell munksgaard</term><term>Boic</term><term>Bone</term><term>Bone area</term><term>Bone area fraction</term><term>Bone chamber</term><term>Bone chamber model</term><term>Bone formation</term><term>Bone fraction</term><term>Bone growth</term><term>Bone marrow</term><term>Bone organization</term><term>Bone tissue</term><term>Bone tissue formation</term><term>Bone trabeculae</term><term>Brous encapsulation</term><term>Central implant</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical orthopaedics</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Computer screen</term><term>Cylindrical implant</term><term>Cylindrical implants</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Different tissue response</term><term>Direct contact</term><term>Duyck</term><term>Early osteogenesis</term><term>Early wound healing</term><term>Effect loading condition</term><term>Electrical engineering</term><term>Endosseous</term><term>Endosseous implants</term><term>Endosseous wound healing</term><term>Experimental study</term><term>Extraction sites</term><term>Extraction socket</term><term>Force transfer</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Fracture healing</term><term>Hard tissue formation</term><term>Harvest number</term><term>Healing</term><term>Higher quantity</term><term>Histological</term><term>Histological section</term><term>Histological sections</term><term>Histomorphometric measurements</term><term>Host bone</term><term>Immediate implant loading</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant contact</term><term>Implant dentistry</term><term>Implant design</term><term>Implant displacement</term><term>Implant geometry effect</term><term>Implant healing</term><term>Implant interface</term><term>Implant surface</term><term>Implant surroundings</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Inner bone chamber</term><term>Interface</term><term>International journal</term><term>Journal compilation</term><term>Katholieke universiteit leuven</term><term>Leuven</term><term>Light microscope</term><term>Loading</term><term>Loading condition</term><term>Loading cycles</term><term>Loading device</term><term>Loading effect</term><term>Loading experiments</term><term>Loading history</term><term>Loading parameters</term><term>Loading protocol</term><term>Loading session</term><term>Loading sessions</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Marrow spaces</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Mechanical conditions</term><term>Mechanical loading</term><term>Mechanical stability</term><term>Mechanical stimulus</term><term>Mesenchymal cells</term><term>Micromotion</term><term>Mineralized</term><term>Mineralized bone</term><term>Mineralized bone fraction</term><term>Model analysis</term><term>Munksgaard</term><term>Native cancellous bone</term><term>Oral implantology</term><term>Oral pathology</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Outer bone chamber</term><term>Physiological loading</term><term>Picrofuchsin stain</term><term>Pilot study</term><term>Positive effect</term><term>Preliminary study</term><term>Present study</term><term>Primary stability</term><term>Proportional odds</term><term>Research flanders</term><term>Same bone chamber</term><term>Screw design</term><term>Secondary stability</term><term>Stress distribution</term><term>Surface characteristics</term><term>Test conditions</term><term>Tissue area</term><term>Tissue area fraction</term><term>Tissue composition</term><term>Tissue differentiation</term><term>Tissue formation</term><term>Tissue growth</term><term>Tissue mineralization</term><term>Tissue response</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium implant</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Tooth extraction sites</term><term>Trabecula</term><term>Trabecular</term><term>Trabecular bone</term><term>Undisturbed healing</term><term>Vandamme</term><term>Vander sloten</term><term>Variable loading condition</term><term>Vivo loading</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Aim: Tissue formation at the implant interface is known to be sensitive to mechanical stimuli. The aim of the study was to compare the bone formation around immediately loaded versus unloaded implants in two different implant macro‐designs.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>bone chamber</json:string><json:string>bone formation</json:string><json:string>histological</json:string><json:string>duyck</json:string><json:string>trabecula</json:string><json:string>implant design</json:string><json:string>osseointegration</json:string><json:string>endosseous</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>journal compilation</json:string><json:string>vandamme</json:string><json:string>munksgaard</json:string><json:string>blackwell munksgaard</json:string><json:string>leuven</json:string><json:string>boic</json:string><json:string>immediate loading</json:string><json:string>trabecular</json:string><json:string>implant surface</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>inner bone chamber</json:string><json:string>immediate implant loading</json:string><json:string>micromotion</json:string><json:string>bone marrow</json:string><json:string>bone trabeculae</json:string><json:string>mechanical conditions</json:string><json:string>outer bone chamber</json:string><json:string>direct contact</json:string><json:string>cylindrical implant</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>implant contact</json:string><json:string>endosseous implants</json:string><json:string>mineralized</json:string><json:string>bone area</json:string><json:string>implant geometry effect</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>histological sections</json:string><json:string>primary stability</json:string><json:string>positive effect</json:string><json:string>biomedical materials research</json:string><json:string>histological section</json:string><json:string>vander sloten</json:string><json:string>loading protocol</json:string><json:string>tissue differentiation</json:string><json:string>mechanical loading</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>cylindrical implants</json:string><json:string>marrow spaces</json:string><json:string>proportional odds</json:string><json:string>titanium implant</json:string><json:string>central implant</json:string><json:string>bone tissue formation</json:string><json:string>titanium implants</json:string><json:string>loading</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>fracture</json:string><json:string>titanium</json:string><json:string>tissue mineralization</json:string><json:string>loading device</json:string><json:string>bone fraction</json:string><json:string>katholieke universiteit leuven</json:string><json:string>mineralized bone</json:string><json:string>implant interface</json:string><json:string>loading condition</json:string><json:string>picrofuchsin stain</json:string><json:string>variable loading condition</json:string><json:string>tissue growth</json:string><json:string>harvest number</json:string><json:string>fracture healing</json:string><json:string>early osteogenesis</json:string><json:string>implant displacement</json:string><json:string>loading effect</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>mineralized bone fraction</json:string><json:string>bone tissue</json:string><json:string>trabecular bone</json:string><json:string>clinical periodontology</json:string><json:string>bone area fraction</json:string><json:string>bone chamber model</json:string><json:string>stress distribution</json:string><json:string>loading experiments</json:string><json:string>interface</json:string><json:string>belgium</json:string><json:string>bone</json:string><json:string>same bone chamber</json:string><json:string>electrical engineering</json:string><json:string>mechanical stability</json:string><json:string>brous encapsulation</json:string><json:string>mesenchymal cells</json:string><json:string>histomorphometric measurements</json:string><json:string>implant healing</json:string><json:string>loading cycles</json:string><json:string>early wound healing</json:string><json:string>clin periodontol</json:string><json:string>surface characteristics</json:string><json:string>undisturbed healing</json:string><json:string>effect loading condition</json:string><json:string>model analysis</json:string><json:string>light microscope</json:string><json:string>tissue response</json:string><json:string>hard tissue formation</json:string><json:string>different tissue response</json:string><json:string>tissue composition</json:string><json:string>tissue area fraction</json:string><json:string>tooth extraction sites</json:string><json:string>extraction socket</json:string><json:string>research flanders</json:string><json:string>secondary stability</json:string><json:string>loading history</json:string><json:string>screw design</json:string><json:string>computer screen</json:string><json:string>mechanical stimulus</json:string><json:string>native cancellous bone</json:string><json:string>vivo loading</json:string><json:string>test conditions</json:string><json:string>bone organization</json:string><json:string>higher quantity</json:string><json:string>bone growth</json:string><json:string>endosseous wound healing</json:string><json:string>tissue area</json:string><json:string>force transfer</json:string><json:string>extraction sites</json:string><json:string>host bone</json:string><json:string>implant surroundings</json:string><json:string>physiological loading</json:string><json:string>loading session</json:string><json:string>loading parameters</json:string><json:string>loading sessions</json:string><json:string>mandibular overdentures</json:string><json:string>preliminary study</json:string><json:string>oral pathology</json:string><json:string>implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>oral implantology</json:string><json:string>appositional bone formation</json:string><json:string>experimental study</json:string><json:string>tissue formation</json:string><json:string>clinical orthopaedics</json:string><json:string>pilot study</json:string><json:string>healing</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Katleen Vandamme</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Ignace Naert</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Liesbet Geris</name><affiliations><json:string>Division of Biomechanics and Engineering Design, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Jozef Vander Sloten</name><affiliations><json:string>Division of Biomechanics and Engineering Design, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Robert Puers</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Electrical Engineering–ESAT‐MICAS, K.U.Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Joke Duyck</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>animal</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bone chamber</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>immediate loading</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant macro‐design</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>peri‐implant healing</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JCPE1014</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-T5LR3X8Q-L</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Aim: Tissue formation at the implant interface is known to be sensitive to mechanical stimuli. The aim of the study was to compare the bone formation around immediately loaded versus unloaded implants in two different implant macro‐designs.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>37</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>240</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount><score>7.444</score><pdfWordCount>6514</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>43450</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>Influence of controlled immediate loading and implant design on peri‐implant bone formation</title><pmid><json:string>17309592</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0303-6979</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-051X</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JCPE</json:string></publisherId><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>172</first><last>181</last><total>10</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>61s</json:string><json:string>1000s</json:string><json:string>2007</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Department of Morphology and Molecular Pathology</json:string><json:string>Department of Electrical Engineering</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Von Gieson</json:string><json:string>Michel De Cooman</json:string><json:string>B. Van Damme</json:string><json:string>Silver Spring</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Japan</json:string><json:string>Brussels</json:string><json:string>Wetzlar</json:string><json:string>Leuven</json:string><json:string>Mechelen</json:string><json:string>Belgium</json:string><json:string>Netherlands</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Szmukler-Moncler et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Attard & Zarb 2005</json:string><json:string>Slaets et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Claes et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>van der Meulen et al. (2006)</json:string><json:string>Berglundh et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Watzak et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Meijer et al. 2004a, b</json:string><json:string>Akimoto et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Goodman et al. 1993</json:string><json:string>Batenburg et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Tada et al. (2003)</json:string><json:string>Rimondini et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Vandamme et al.</json:string><json:string>Hall et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Simmons et al. 1999, 2001</json:string><json:string>Carter 1987</json:string><json:string>Neugebauer et al. (2006)</json:string><json:string>Meyer et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Duyck et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>See, Duyck et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Franchi et al. 2004, 2005</json:string><json:string>Carter et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Davies 2003</json:string><json:string>Raghavendra et al. (2005)</json:string><json:string>Klein et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Graf 1969</json:string><json:string>Vandamme et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Cardaropoli et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Duyck et al. (2004)</json:string><json:string>Pilliar et al. (1995)</json:string><json:string>Misch 1999</json:string><json:string>Piattelli et al. 1993</json:string><json:string>Duyck et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Szmukler-Moncler et al. (1998)</json:string><json:string>Gapski et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Siegele & Soltesz 1989</json:string><json:string>Szmukler-Moncler et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Botticelli et al. 2003a, b, 2004</json:string><json:string>Osborn & Newesely 1980</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-T5LR3X8Q-L</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Periodontics</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2007</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2007</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.01014.x</json:string></doi><id>1488BDBEF0DCA79360EF1967A96714FC90512589</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/1488BDBEF0DCA79360EF1967A96714FC90512589/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/1488BDBEF0DCA79360EF1967A96714FC90512589/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/1488BDBEF0DCA79360EF1967A96714FC90512589/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Influence of controlled immediate loading and implant design on peri‐implant bone formation</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-02"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Influence of controlled immediate loading and implant design on peri‐implant bone formation</title><title level="a" type="short">Influence of controlled immediate implant loading</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Katleen</forename><surname>Vandamme</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Ignace</forename><surname>Naert</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Liesbet</forename><surname>Geris</surname></persName><affiliation>Division of Biomechanics and Engineering Design, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Jozef Vander</forename><surname>Sloten</surname></persName><affiliation>Division of Biomechanics and Engineering Design, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Robert</forename><surname>Puers</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Electrical Engineering–ESAT‐MICAS, K.U.Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0005"><persName><forename type="first">Joke</forename><surname>Duyck</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">1488BDBEF0DCA79360EF1967A96714FC90512589</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-T5LR3X8Q-L</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.01014.x</idno><idno type="unit">JCPE1014</idno><idno type="supplier">1014</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JCPE.JCPE1014.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="pISSN">0303-6979</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-051X</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cpe.2007.34.issue-2</idno><idno type="product">JCPE</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">34</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="172">172</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="181">181</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-02"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p><hi rend="bold">Aim: </hi> Tissue formation at the implant interface is known to be sensitive to mechanical stimuli. The aim of the study was to compare the bone formation around immediately loaded <hi rend="italic">versus</hi> unloaded implants in two different implant macro‐designs.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Material and Methods: </hi> A repeated sampling bone chamber with a central implant was installed in the tibia of 10 rabbits. Highly controlled loading experiments were designed for a cylindrical (CL) and screw‐shaped (SL) implant, while the unloaded screw‐shaped (SU) implant served as a control. An <hi rend="italic">F</hi>‐statistic model with α=5% determined statistical significance.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi> A significantly higher bone area fraction was observed for SL compared with SU (<hi rend="italic">p</hi><0.0001). The mineralized bone fraction was the highest for SL and significantly different from SU (<hi rend="italic">p</hi><0.0001). The chance that osteoid‐ and bone‐to‐implant contact occurred was the highest for SL and significantly different from SU (<hi rend="italic">p</hi><0.0001), but not from CL. When bone‐to‐implant contact was observed, a loading (SL <hi rend="italic">versus</hi> SU<hi rend="italic">: p</hi>=0.0049) as well as an implant geometry effect (SL <hi rend="italic">versus</hi> CL: <hi rend="italic">p</hi>=0.01) was found, in favour of the SL condition.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusions: </hi> Well‐controlled immediate implant loading accelerates tissue mineralization at the interface. Adequate bone stimulation via mechanical coupling may account for the larger bone response around the screw‐type implant compared with the cylindrical implant.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">animal</term><term xml:id="k2">bone chamber</term><term xml:id="k3">immediate loading</term><term xml:id="k4">implant macro‐design</term><term xml:id="k5">peri‐implant healing</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Implant Therapy</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/1488BDBEF0DCA79360EF1967A96714FC90512589/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</doi><issn type="print">0303-6979</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-051X</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JCPE"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="02002"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cpe.2007.34.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="34">34</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2007-02">February 2007</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="11" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.01014.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JCPE1014"></id><id type="supplier" value="1014"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="10"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Implant Therapy</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2006-12-20"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2006-12-20"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-09"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-23"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="172">172</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="181">181</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Address:
<i>Prof. J. Duyck</i>
<i>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group</i>
<i>School of Dentistry</i>
<i>Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery</i>
<i>Faculty of Medicine</i>
<i>Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (K.U.Leuven)</i>
<i>Kapucijnenvoer 7</i>
<i>B‐3000 Leuven</i>
<i>Belgium</i>
E‐mail: <email normalForm="Joke.Duyck@uz.kuleuven.be">Joke.Duyck@uz.kuleuven.be</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JCPE.JCPE1014.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication 24 September 2006</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="8"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="1"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="49"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="8469"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="57"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Influence of controlled immediate loading and implant design on peri‐implant bone formation</title><title type="shortAuthors">Vandamme et al.</title><title type="short">Influence of controlled immediate implant loading</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Katleen</givenNames><familyName>Vandamme</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Ignace</givenNames><familyName>Naert</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Liesbet</givenNames><familyName>Geris</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Jozef Vander</givenNames><familyName>Sloten</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Robert</givenNames><familyName>Puers</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr6" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Joke</givenNames><familyName>Duyck</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Division of Biomechanics and Engineering Design, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Electrical Engineering–ESAT‐MICAS, K.U.Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg, Leuven, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">animal</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">bone chamber</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">immediate loading</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">implant macro‐design</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">peri‐implant healing</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><!--
Vandamme K, Naert I, Geris L, Vander Sloten J, Puers R, Duyck J. Influence of controlled immediate loading and implant design on peri-implant bone formation.
J Clin Periodontol 2007; 34: 172–181. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.01014.x.
--><title type="main">Abstract</title><p><b>Aim: </b> Tissue formation at the implant interface is known to be sensitive to mechanical stimuli. The aim of the study was to compare the bone formation around immediately loaded <i>versus</i> unloaded implants in two different implant macro‐designs.</p><p><b>Material and Methods: </b> A repeated sampling bone chamber with a central implant was installed in the tibia of 10 rabbits. Highly controlled loading experiments were designed for a cylindrical (CL) and screw‐shaped (SL) implant, while the unloaded screw‐shaped (SU) implant served as a control. An <i>F</i>‐statistic model with α=5% determined statistical significance.</p><p><b>Results: </b> A significantly higher bone area fraction was observed for SL compared with SU (<i>p</i><0.0001). The mineralized bone fraction was the highest for SL and significantly different from SU (<i>p</i><0.0001). The chance that osteoid‐ and bone‐to‐implant contact occurred was the highest for SL and significantly different from SU (<i>p</i><0.0001), but not from CL. When bone‐to‐implant contact was observed, a loading (SL <i>versus</i> SU<i>: p</i>=0.0049) as well as an implant geometry effect (SL <i>versus</i> CL: <i>p</i>=0.01) was found, in favour of the SL condition.</p><p><b>Conclusions: </b> Well‐controlled immediate implant loading accelerates tissue mineralization at the interface. Adequate bone stimulation via mechanical coupling may account for the larger bone response around the screw‐type implant compared with the cylindrical implant.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note xml:id="fn1" numbered="no"><p><b>Conflict of interest and source of funding statement</b> The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Lies Geris is a research assistant and Joke Duyck is a postdoctoral research fellow of the Fund for Scientific Research Flanders.</p></note><note xml:id="fn2" numbered="no"><p>This study was supported by the Research Council of the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Belgium) (OT/02/50) and the Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (Belgium) (O6260).</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Influence of controlled immediate loading and implant design on peri‐implant bone formation</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Influence of controlled immediate implant loading</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Influence of controlled immediate loading and implant design on peri‐implant bone formation</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Katleen</namePart><namePart type="family">Vandamme</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Ignace</namePart><namePart type="family">Naert</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Liesbet</namePart><namePart type="family">Geris</namePart><affiliation>Division of Biomechanics and Engineering Design, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Jozef Vander</namePart><namePart type="family">Sloten</namePart><affiliation>Division of Biomechanics and Engineering Design, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Robert</namePart><namePart type="family">Puers</namePart><affiliation>Department of Electrical Engineering–ESAT‐MICAS, K.U.Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Joke</namePart><namePart type="family">Duyck</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2007-02</dateIssued><edition>Accepted for publication 24 September 2006</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2007</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">8</extent><extent unit="tables">1</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">49</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">57</extent><extent unit="words">8469</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Aim: Tissue formation at the implant interface is known to be sensitive to mechanical stimuli. The aim of the study was to compare the bone formation around immediately loaded versus unloaded implants in two different implant macro‐designs.</abstract><abstract>Material and Methods: A repeated sampling bone chamber with a central implant was installed in the tibia of 10 rabbits. Highly controlled loading experiments were designed for a cylindrical (CL) and screw‐shaped (SL) implant, while the unloaded screw‐shaped (SU) implant served as a control. An F‐statistic model with α=5% determined statistical significance.</abstract><abstract>Results: A significantly higher bone area fraction was observed for SL compared with SU (p<0.0001). The mineralized bone fraction was the highest for SL and significantly different from SU (p<0.0001). The chance that osteoid‐ and bone‐to‐implant contact occurred was the highest for SL and significantly different from SU (p<0.0001), but not from CL. When bone‐to‐implant contact was observed, a loading (SL versus SU: p=0.0049) as well as an implant geometry effect (SL versus CL: p=0.01) was found, in favour of the SL condition.</abstract><abstract>Conclusions: Well‐controlled immediate implant loading accelerates tissue mineralization at the interface. Adequate bone stimulation via mechanical coupling may account for the larger bone response around the screw‐type implant compared with the cylindrical implant.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>animal</topic><topic>bone chamber</topic><topic>immediate loading</topic><topic>implant macro‐design</topic><topic>peri‐implant healing</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0303-6979</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-051X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JCPE</identifier><part><date>2007</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>34</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>172</start><end>181</end><total>10</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">1488BDBEF0DCA79360EF1967A96714FC90512589</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-T5LR3X8Q-L</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.01014.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JCPE1014</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/1488BDBEF0DCA79360EF1967A96714FC90512589/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A20 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000A20 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:1488BDBEF0DCA79360EF1967A96714FC90512589
|texte= Influence of controlled immediate loading and implant design on peri‐implant bone formation
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |