Single Implant Treatment in Healing Versus Healed Sites of the Anterior Maxilla: An Aesthetic Evaluation
Identifieur interne : 000A13 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000A12; suivant : 000A14Single Implant Treatment in Healing Versus Healed Sites of the Anterior Maxilla: An Aesthetic Evaluation
Auteurs : Jan Cosyn ; Aryan Eghbali ; Hugo De Bruyn ; Melissa Dierens ; Tim De RouckSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2012-08.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Aesthetic failures, Aesthetic outcome, Aesthetic treatment outcome, Aesthetics, Alveolar process, Anterior maxilla, Belser, Biotype, Bone level, Bone regeneration, Buser, Clin, Clin periodontol, Clinical acceptance, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinician, Colleagues9, Conventional implant placement, Cumulative percent, Cuspid, Cuspid position, Dental implants, Dental school, Distal papillae, Early implant placement, Early placement, Free university, Ghent, Gingival, Gingival biotype, Healing sites, Health sciences, Immediate implant placement, Implant, Implant crown, Implant placement, Implant restoration, Implant restorations, Implant surgery, Implant treatment, Implant treatments, Incisor, Lateral incisor position, Maxilla, Mesial, Mesial papilla, Metal exposure, Midfacial, Nobel biocare, Oral implantology, Oral maxillofac implants, Papilla, Perfect result, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Periodontal probe, Periodontol, Pink aesthetics, Premolar, Premolar position, Present study, Prospective study, Prosthodontist, Reference tooth, Regeneration, Single implant treatment, Single implant treatments, Single implants, Soft tissue color, Soft tissue criteria, Soft tissues, Spearman correlation, Strict minority, Tissue level, Tooth color, Tooth extraction, Tooth loss, Tooth texture, Tooth volume, Treatment modalities, Treatment outcome, Unfavorable outcome, White aesthetics.
- Teeft :
- Aesthetic failures, Aesthetic outcome, Aesthetic treatment outcome, Aesthetics, Alveolar process, Anterior maxilla, Belser, Biotype, Bone level, Bone regeneration, Buser, Clin, Clin periodontol, Clinical acceptance, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinician, Colleagues9, Conventional implant placement, Cumulative percent, Cuspid, Cuspid position, Dental implants, Dental school, Distal papillae, Early implant placement, Early placement, Free university, Ghent, Gingival, Gingival biotype, Healing sites, Health sciences, Immediate implant placement, Implant, Implant crown, Implant placement, Implant restoration, Implant restorations, Implant surgery, Implant treatment, Implant treatments, Incisor, Lateral incisor position, Maxilla, Mesial, Mesial papilla, Metal exposure, Midfacial, Nobel biocare, Oral implantology, Oral maxillofac implants, Papilla, Perfect result, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Periodontal probe, Periodontol, Pink aesthetics, Premolar, Premolar position, Present study, Prospective study, Prosthodontist, Reference tooth, Regeneration, Single implant treatment, Single implant treatments, Single implants, Soft tissue color, Soft tissue criteria, Soft tissues, Spearman correlation, Strict minority, Tissue level, Tooth color, Tooth extraction, Tooth loss, Tooth texture, Tooth volume, Treatment modalities, Treatment outcome, Unfavorable outcome, White aesthetics.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim was to compare and document in detail the aesthetic outcome of single implant treatment in healing sites (early implant placement) with fully healed sites (conventional implant placement) of the anterior maxilla.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00300.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:1468A8A6584B1FBEE03DAC23A84BC4B2875A07C6Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Single Implant Treatment in Healing Versus Healed Sites of the Anterior Maxilla: An Aesthetic Evaluation</title><author><name sortKey="Cosyn, Jan" sort="Cosyn, Jan" uniqKey="Cosyn J" first="Jan" last="Cosyn">Jan Cosyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Periodontist and assistant professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium; Dental Medicine, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Brussels, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: jan.cosyn@ugent.be</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Eghbali, Aryan" sort="Eghbali, Aryan" uniqKey="Eghbali A" first="Aryan" last="Eghbali">Aryan Eghbali</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>periodontist in training and PhD student;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Bruyn, Hugo" sort="De Bruyn, Hugo" uniqKey="De Bruyn H" first="Hugo" last="De Bruyn">Hugo De Bruyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>periodontist, professor and chairman, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dierens, Melissa" sort="Dierens, Melissa" uniqKey="Dierens M" first="Melissa" last="Dierens">Melissa Dierens</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>periodontist and PhD student, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Rouck, Tim" sort="De Rouck, Tim" uniqKey="De Rouck T" first="Tim" last="De Rouck">Tim De Rouck</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>prosthodontist and assistant, Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium; Dental Medicine, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Brussels, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:1468A8A6584B1FBEE03DAC23A84BC4B2875A07C6</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00300.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/1468A8A6584B1FBEE03DAC23A84BC4B2875A07C6/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000A13</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000A13</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Single Implant Treatment in Healing Versus Healed Sites of the Anterior Maxilla: An Aesthetic Evaluation</title><author><name sortKey="Cosyn, Jan" sort="Cosyn, Jan" uniqKey="Cosyn J" first="Jan" last="Cosyn">Jan Cosyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Periodontist and assistant professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium; Dental Medicine, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Brussels, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: jan.cosyn@ugent.be</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Eghbali, Aryan" sort="Eghbali, Aryan" uniqKey="Eghbali A" first="Aryan" last="Eghbali">Aryan Eghbali</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>periodontist in training and PhD student;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Bruyn, Hugo" sort="De Bruyn, Hugo" uniqKey="De Bruyn H" first="Hugo" last="De Bruyn">Hugo De Bruyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>periodontist, professor and chairman, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dierens, Melissa" sort="Dierens, Melissa" uniqKey="Dierens M" first="Melissa" last="Dierens">Melissa Dierens</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>periodontist and PhD student, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Rouck, Tim" sort="De Rouck, Tim" uniqKey="De Rouck T" first="Tim" last="De Rouck">Tim De Rouck</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>prosthodontist and assistant, Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium; Dental Medicine, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Brussels, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="517">517</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="526">526</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-08">2012-08</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aesthetic failures</term><term>Aesthetic outcome</term><term>Aesthetic treatment outcome</term><term>Aesthetics</term><term>Alveolar process</term><term>Anterior maxilla</term><term>Belser</term><term>Biotype</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone regeneration</term><term>Buser</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical acceptance</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinician</term><term>Colleagues9</term><term>Conventional implant placement</term><term>Cumulative percent</term><term>Cuspid</term><term>Cuspid position</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental school</term><term>Distal papillae</term><term>Early implant placement</term><term>Early placement</term><term>Free university</term><term>Ghent</term><term>Gingival</term><term>Gingival biotype</term><term>Healing sites</term><term>Health sciences</term><term>Immediate implant placement</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant crown</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant restoration</term><term>Implant restorations</term><term>Implant surgery</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Implant treatments</term><term>Incisor</term><term>Lateral incisor position</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Mesial</term><term>Mesial papilla</term><term>Metal exposure</term><term>Midfacial</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral implantology</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Papilla</term><term>Perfect result</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Periodontal probe</term><term>Periodontol</term><term>Pink aesthetics</term><term>Premolar</term><term>Premolar position</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthodontist</term><term>Reference tooth</term><term>Regeneration</term><term>Single implant treatment</term><term>Single implant treatments</term><term>Single implants</term><term>Soft tissue color</term><term>Soft tissue criteria</term><term>Soft tissues</term><term>Spearman correlation</term><term>Strict minority</term><term>Tissue level</term><term>Tooth color</term><term>Tooth extraction</term><term>Tooth loss</term><term>Tooth texture</term><term>Tooth volume</term><term>Treatment modalities</term><term>Treatment outcome</term><term>Unfavorable outcome</term><term>White aesthetics</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Aesthetic failures</term><term>Aesthetic outcome</term><term>Aesthetic treatment outcome</term><term>Aesthetics</term><term>Alveolar process</term><term>Anterior maxilla</term><term>Belser</term><term>Biotype</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone regeneration</term><term>Buser</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical acceptance</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinician</term><term>Colleagues9</term><term>Conventional implant placement</term><term>Cumulative percent</term><term>Cuspid</term><term>Cuspid position</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental school</term><term>Distal papillae</term><term>Early implant placement</term><term>Early placement</term><term>Free university</term><term>Ghent</term><term>Gingival</term><term>Gingival biotype</term><term>Healing sites</term><term>Health sciences</term><term>Immediate implant placement</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant crown</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant restoration</term><term>Implant restorations</term><term>Implant surgery</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Implant treatments</term><term>Incisor</term><term>Lateral incisor position</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Mesial</term><term>Mesial papilla</term><term>Metal exposure</term><term>Midfacial</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral implantology</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Papilla</term><term>Perfect result</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Periodontal probe</term><term>Periodontol</term><term>Pink aesthetics</term><term>Premolar</term><term>Premolar position</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthodontist</term><term>Reference tooth</term><term>Regeneration</term><term>Single implant treatment</term><term>Single implant treatments</term><term>Single implants</term><term>Soft tissue color</term><term>Soft tissue criteria</term><term>Soft tissues</term><term>Spearman correlation</term><term>Strict minority</term><term>Tissue level</term><term>Tooth color</term><term>Tooth extraction</term><term>Tooth loss</term><term>Tooth texture</term><term>Tooth volume</term><term>Treatment modalities</term><term>Treatment outcome</term><term>Unfavorable outcome</term><term>White aesthetics</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Purpose: The aim was to compare and document in detail the aesthetic outcome of single implant treatment in healing sites (early implant placement) with fully healed sites (conventional implant placement) of the anterior maxilla.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>papilla</json:string><json:string>biotype</json:string><json:string>aesthetic outcome</json:string><json:string>single implant treatment</json:string><json:string>belser</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>gingival</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>anterior maxilla</json:string><json:string>midfacial</json:string><json:string>aesthetics</json:string><json:string>clinician</json:string><json:string>premolar</json:string><json:string>incisor</json:string><json:string>periodontol</json:string><json:string>gingival biotype</json:string><json:string>buser</json:string><json:string>colleagues9</json:string><json:string>soft tissues</json:string><json:string>bone regeneration</json:string><json:string>mesial</json:string><json:string>alveolar process</json:string><json:string>cuspid</json:string><json:string>prosthodontist</json:string><json:string>periodontal</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>tooth color</json:string><json:string>early implant placement</json:string><json:string>dental school</json:string><json:string>implant restoration</json:string><json:string>perfect result</json:string><json:string>bone level</json:string><json:string>aesthetic treatment outcome</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>aesthetic failures</json:string><json:string>tooth texture</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>conventional implant placement</json:string><json:string>treatment outcome</json:string><json:string>ghent</json:string><json:string>clin periodontol</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>oral implantology</json:string><json:string>pink aesthetics</json:string><json:string>white aesthetics</json:string><json:string>cumulative percent</json:string><json:string>healing sites</json:string><json:string>health sciences</json:string><json:string>nobel biocare</json:string><json:string>free university</json:string><json:string>lateral incisor position</json:string><json:string>tooth extraction</json:string><json:string>periodontal disease</json:string><json:string>implant treatment</json:string><json:string>tissue level</json:string><json:string>regeneration</json:string><json:string>single implants</json:string><json:string>clinical acceptance</json:string><json:string>metal exposure</json:string><json:string>spearman correlation</json:string><json:string>tooth loss</json:string><json:string>reference tooth</json:string><json:string>soft tissue color</json:string><json:string>treatment modalities</json:string><json:string>mesial papilla</json:string><json:string>unfavorable outcome</json:string><json:string>implant surgery</json:string><json:string>periodontal probe</json:string><json:string>tooth volume</json:string><json:string>cuspid position</json:string><json:string>premolar position</json:string><json:string>single implant treatments</json:string><json:string>soft tissue criteria</json:string><json:string>immediate implant placement</json:string><json:string>implant crown</json:string><json:string>implant restorations</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>strict minority</json:string><json:string>distal papillae</json:string><json:string>implant treatments</json:string><json:string>early placement</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Jan Cosyn DDS, MSc, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Periodontist and assistant professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium; Dental Medicine, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Brussels, Belgium;</json:string><json:string>E-mail: jan.cosyn@ugent.be</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Aryan Eghbali DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>periodontist in training and PhD student;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Hugo De Bruyn DDS, MSc, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>periodontist, professor and chairman, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Melissa Dierens DDS, MSc</name><affiliations><json:string>periodontist and PhD student, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Tim De Rouck DDS, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>prosthodontist and assistant, Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium; Dental Medicine, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Brussels, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>conventional</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implant</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>early</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>pink esthetic score</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>single tooth</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>white esthetic score</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID300</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-2BRXQ9DQ-K</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Purpose: The aim was to compare and document in detail the aesthetic outcome of single implant treatment in healing sites (early implant placement) with fully healed sites (conventional implant placement) of the anterior maxilla.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.408</score><pdfWordCount>5539</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>35299</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>585 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>34</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>229</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>6</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Single Implant Treatment in Healing Versus Healed Sites of the Anterior Maxilla: An Aesthetic Evaluation</title><pmid><json:string>20662859</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>14</volume><issue>4</issue><pages><first>517</first><last>526</last><total>10</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2000</json:string><json:string>1975</json:string><json:string>2012</json:string><json:string>2006</json:string><json:string>2007</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health</json:string><json:string>Free University</json:string><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>Department of Periodontology and Oral</json:string><json:string>University of Ghent</json:string><json:string>Belgium INTRODUCTION Implant</json:string><json:string>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Romeo</json:string><json:string>R. Cleymaet</json:string><json:string>Meijndert</json:string><json:string>Lai</json:string><json:string>Jan Cosyn</json:string><json:string>Belser</json:string><json:string>Fürhauser</json:string><json:string>Selection</json:string><json:string>Hugo De Bruyn</json:string><json:string>Buser</json:string><json:string>Meijer</json:string><json:string>Esposito</json:string><json:string>Schropp</json:string><json:string>Rouck</json:string><json:string>Clinic</json:string><json:string>Melissa Dierens</json:string><json:string>Aryan Eghbali</json:string><json:string>Albrektsson</json:string><json:string>Tim De Rouck</json:string><json:string>Iris Wyn</json:string><json:string>Noelken</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Ghent</json:string><json:string>Helsinki</json:string><json:string>America</json:string><json:string>Brussels</json:string><json:string>Italy</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Belgium</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>[0]</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-2BRXQ9DQ-K</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00300.x</json:string></doi><id>1468A8A6584B1FBEE03DAC23A84BC4B2875A07C6</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/1468A8A6584B1FBEE03DAC23A84BC4B2875A07C6/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/1468A8A6584B1FBEE03DAC23A84BC4B2875A07C6/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/1468A8A6584B1FBEE03DAC23A84BC4B2875A07C6/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Single Implant Treatment in Healing Versus Healed Sites of the Anterior Maxilla: An Aesthetic Evaluation</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2012-08"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Single Implant Treatment in Healing Versus Healed Sites of the Anterior Maxilla: An Aesthetic Evaluation</title><title level="a" type="short">Early and Conventional Single Implants</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Jan</forename><surname>Cosyn</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, MSc, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Periodontist and assistant professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium; Dental Medicine, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Brussels, Belgium;<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Dr. Jan Cosyn, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, B‐9000 Ghent, Belgium; e‐mail: jan.cosyn@ugent.be</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Aryan</forename><surname>Eghbali</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>periodontist in training and PhD student;</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Hugo</forename><surname>De Bruyn</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, MSc, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>periodontist, professor and chairman, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium;<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Melissa</forename><surname>Dierens</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, MSc</roleName></persName><affiliation>periodontist and PhD student, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium;<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Tim</forename><surname>De Rouck</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>prosthodontist and assistant, Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium; Dental Medicine, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Brussels, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">1468A8A6584B1FBEE03DAC23A84BC4B2875A07C6</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-2BRXQ9DQ-K</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00300.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID300</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID300.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2012.14.issue-4</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="517">517</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="526">526</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-08"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p><hi rend="bold">Purpose:</hi> The aim was to compare and document in detail the aesthetic outcome of single implant treatment in healing sites (early implant placement) with fully healed sites (conventional implant placement) of the anterior maxilla.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and Methods:</hi> A cross‐sectional study in patients who had been treated by two periodontists and two prosthodontists in 2006 and 2007 was conducted. Surgical treatment involved standard flap elevation without releasing incisions and restorative procedures included cemented crowns in all patients. Only straightforward single implant treatments using Nobelreplace tapered TiUnite® implants (Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden) in healing sites (6–8 weeks following tooth extraction) and fully healed sites (≥6 months following tooth extraction) were considered with both neighboring teeth present and without the need for hard and/or soft tissue grafting. The aesthetic outcome was objectively rated using the pink esthetic score (PES) and white esthetic scrore (WES) by a blinded clinician who had not been involved in the treatment. Patients rated aesthetics by means of visual analogue scales.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results:</hi> Twenty‐one out of 22 early and 25/27 conventional implant treatments were available for aesthetic evaluation after on average two and a half years of function (range 17–41 months). There were no significant differences for any of the criteria between the treatment concepts. Overall, papillae were most easy to satisfy, whereas alveolar process and tooth color most difficult. A thin‐scalloped biotype was associated with low distal papillae (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> = .041) and alveolar process deficiency (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> = .039). Twenty‐six percent of the cases were aesthetic failures (PES < 8 and/or WES < 6) and 13% showed an (almost) perfect outcome (PES ≥ 12 and WES ≥ 9). The remainder (61%) demonstrated acceptable aesthetics. There was no significant correlation between objective and subjective ratings.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusions:</hi> Early and conventional single implant treatment yielded comparable aesthetic outcome. Albeit all treatments had been performed by experienced clinicians and only straightforward cases had been selected, 1 out of 4 cases were aesthetic failures and only a strict minority showed perfection. Research is required on the aesthetic outcome of alternative surgical procedures especially in high‐risk patients with a thin‐scalloped biotype.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">conventional</term><term xml:id="k2">dental implant</term><term xml:id="k3">early</term><term xml:id="k4">pink esthetic score</term><term xml:id="k5">single tooth</term><term xml:id="k6">white esthetic score</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>ARTICLES</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/1468A8A6584B1FBEE03DAC23A84BC4B2875A07C6/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="08104"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.2012.14.issue-4</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="14">14</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="4">4</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-08">August 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="6" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00300.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID300"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="10"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-07-17"></event><event type="publishedOnlineAcceptedOrEarlyUnpaginated" date="2010-07-17"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.1.6 mode:FullText" date="2012-08-01"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-08-01"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="517">517</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="526">526</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Dr. Jan Cosyn, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, B‐9000 Ghent, Belgium; e‐mail: <email>jan.cosyn@ugent.be</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID300.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="6"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="1"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="32"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="6218"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Single Implant Treatment in Healing Versus Healed Sites of the Anterior Maxilla: An Aesthetic Evaluation</title><title type="shortAuthors">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Volume *, Number *, 2010</title><title type="short">Early and Conventional Single Implants</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Jan</givenNames><familyName>Cosyn</familyName><degrees>DDS, MSc, PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Aryan</givenNames><familyName>Eghbali</familyName><degrees>DDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Hugo</givenNames><familyName>De Bruyn</familyName><degrees>DDS, MSc, PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a4"><personName><givenNames>Melissa</givenNames><familyName>Dierens</familyName><degrees>DDS, MSc</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a5"><personName><givenNames>Tim</givenNames><familyName>De Rouck</familyName><degrees>DDS, PhD</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Periodontist and assistant professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium; Dental Medicine, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Brussels, Belgium;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2"><unparsedAffiliation>periodontist in training and PhD student;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>periodontist, professor and chairman, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>periodontist and PhD student, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a5" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>prosthodontist and assistant, Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium; Dental Medicine, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Brussels, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">conventional</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">dental implant</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">early</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">pink esthetic score</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">single tooth</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">white esthetic score</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p><b>Purpose:</b> The aim was to compare and document in detail the aesthetic outcome of single implant treatment in healing sites (early implant placement) with fully healed sites (conventional implant placement) of the anterior maxilla.</p><p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> A cross‐sectional study in patients who had been treated by two periodontists and two prosthodontists in 2006 and 2007 was conducted. Surgical treatment involved standard flap elevation without releasing incisions and restorative procedures included cemented crowns in all patients. Only straightforward single implant treatments using Nobelreplace tapered TiUnite® implants (Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden) in healing sites (6–8 weeks following tooth extraction) and fully healed sites (≥6 months following tooth extraction) were considered with both neighboring teeth present and without the need for hard and/or soft tissue grafting. The aesthetic outcome was objectively rated using the pink esthetic score (PES) and white esthetic scrore (WES) by a blinded clinician who had not been involved in the treatment. Patients rated aesthetics by means of visual analogue scales.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Twenty‐one out of 22 early and 25/27 conventional implant treatments were available for aesthetic evaluation after on average two and a half years of function (range 17–41 months). There were no significant differences for any of the criteria between the treatment concepts. Overall, papillae were most easy to satisfy, whereas alveolar process and tooth color most difficult. A thin‐scalloped biotype was associated with low distal papillae (<i>p</i> = .041) and alveolar process deficiency (<i>p</i> = .039). Twenty‐six percent of the cases were aesthetic failures (PES < 8 and/or WES < 6) and 13% showed an (almost) perfect outcome (PES ≥ 12 and WES ≥ 9). The remainder (61%) demonstrated acceptable aesthetics. There was no significant correlation between objective and subjective ratings.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Early and conventional single implant treatment yielded comparable aesthetic outcome. Albeit all treatments had been performed by experienced clinicians and only straightforward cases had been selected, 1 out of 4 cases were aesthetic failures and only a strict minority showed perfection. Research is required on the aesthetic outcome of alternative surgical procedures especially in high‐risk patients with a thin‐scalloped biotype.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Single Implant Treatment in Healing Versus Healed Sites of the Anterior Maxilla: An Aesthetic Evaluation</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Early and Conventional Single Implants</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Single Implant Treatment in Healing Versus Healed Sites of the Anterior Maxilla: An Aesthetic Evaluation</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Jan</namePart><namePart type="family">Cosyn</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MSc, PhD</namePart><affiliation>Periodontist and assistant professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium; Dental Medicine, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Brussels, Belgium;</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: jan.cosyn@ugent.be</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Aryan</namePart><namePart type="family">Eghbali</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>periodontist in training and PhD student;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Hugo</namePart><namePart type="family">De Bruyn</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MSc, PhD</namePart><affiliation>periodontist, professor and chairman, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Melissa</namePart><namePart type="family">Dierens</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MSc</namePart><affiliation>periodontist and PhD student, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Tim</namePart><namePart type="family">De Rouck</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart><affiliation>prosthodontist and assistant, Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium; Dental Medicine, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Brussels, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-08</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">6</extent><extent unit="tables">1</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">32</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">6218</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Purpose: The aim was to compare and document in detail the aesthetic outcome of single implant treatment in healing sites (early implant placement) with fully healed sites (conventional implant placement) of the anterior maxilla.</abstract><abstract>Materials and Methods: A cross‐sectional study in patients who had been treated by two periodontists and two prosthodontists in 2006 and 2007 was conducted. Surgical treatment involved standard flap elevation without releasing incisions and restorative procedures included cemented crowns in all patients. Only straightforward single implant treatments using Nobelreplace tapered TiUnite® implants (Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden) in healing sites (6–8 weeks following tooth extraction) and fully healed sites (≥6 months following tooth extraction) were considered with both neighboring teeth present and without the need for hard and/or soft tissue grafting. The aesthetic outcome was objectively rated using the pink esthetic score (PES) and white esthetic scrore (WES) by a blinded clinician who had not been involved in the treatment. Patients rated aesthetics by means of visual analogue scales.</abstract><abstract>Results: Twenty‐one out of 22 early and 25/27 conventional implant treatments were available for aesthetic evaluation after on average two and a half years of function (range 17–41 months). There were no significant differences for any of the criteria between the treatment concepts. Overall, papillae were most easy to satisfy, whereas alveolar process and tooth color most difficult. A thin‐scalloped biotype was associated with low distal papillae (p = .041) and alveolar process deficiency (p = .039). Twenty‐six percent of the cases were aesthetic failures (PES < 8 and/or WES < 6) and 13% showed an (almost) perfect outcome (PES ≥ 12 and WES ≥ 9). The remainder (61%) demonstrated acceptable aesthetics. There was no significant correlation between objective and subjective ratings.</abstract><abstract>Conclusions: Early and conventional single implant treatment yielded comparable aesthetic outcome. Albeit all treatments had been performed by experienced clinicians and only straightforward cases had been selected, 1 out of 4 cases were aesthetic failures and only a strict minority showed perfection. Research is required on the aesthetic outcome of alternative surgical procedures especially in high‐risk patients with a thin‐scalloped biotype.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>conventional</topic><topic>dental implant</topic><topic>early</topic><topic>pink esthetic score</topic><topic>single tooth</topic><topic>white esthetic score</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>14</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>517</start><end>526</end><total>10</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">1468A8A6584B1FBEE03DAC23A84BC4B2875A07C6</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-2BRXQ9DQ-K</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00300.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID300</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/1468A8A6584B1FBEE03DAC23A84BC4B2875A07C6/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A13 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000A13 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:1468A8A6584B1FBEE03DAC23A84BC4B2875A07C6
|texte= Single Implant Treatment in Healing Versus Healed Sites of the Anterior Maxilla: An Aesthetic Evaluation
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |