RCT comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 2: microbial observations
Identifieur interne : 000899 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000898; suivant : 000900RCT comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 2: microbial observations
Auteurs : M. Quirynen ; N. Van AsscheSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2012-05.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Actinomycetemcomitans, Adhesion, Aerobic, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Albrektsson wennerberg, Anaerobic, Anaerobic species, Assche, Bacterial adhesion, Boever, Bollen, Bone loss, Checkerboard, Clin, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical periodontology, Colonization, Dental implants, Dental research, Dentistry, Detection frequency, Edentulous, Edentulous group, Edentulous patients, Entire period, Forsythia, Gingivalis, Higher concentration, Higher detection frequency, Impl, Implant, Implant surfaces, Implants research, Initial colonization, Intermedia, International journal, John wiley sons, John wiley sons quirynen, Leonhardt, Microbial, Microbiological, Microbiota, Nobel biocare, Nucleatum, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Pathogen, Periodontal, Periodontitis, Periodontology, Periodontopathogens, Plaque, Plaque accumulation, Plaque formation, Porphyromonas, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Present study, Prevotella intermedia, Qpcr, Quirynen, Quirynen bollen, Quirynen listgarten, Recent study, Renvert, Rough implants, Rough surface, Rough surfaces, Roughness, Severe periodontitis, Steenberghe, Subgingival, Subgingival implant microbiota, Subgingival microbiota, Subgroup, Surface roughness, Systematic review, Tanerella forsythia, Teughels, Time point, Titanium, Titanium implants, Tiunite, Tiunite surface, Wennerberg, Winkelhoff.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Actinomycetemcomitans, Adhesion, Aerobic, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Albrektsson wennerberg, Anaerobic, Anaerobic species, Assche, Bacterial adhesion, Boever, Bollen, Bone loss, Checkerboard, Clin, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical periodontology, Colonization, Dental implants, Dental research, Dentistry, Detection frequency, Edentulous, Edentulous group, Edentulous patients, Entire period, Forsythia, Gingivalis, Higher concentration, Higher detection frequency, Impl, Implant, Implant surfaces, Implants research, Initial colonization, Intermedia, International journal, John wiley sons, John wiley sons quirynen, Leonhardt, Microbial, Microbiological, Microbiota, Nobel biocare, Nucleatum, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Pathogen, Periodontal, Periodontitis, Periodontology, Periodontopathogens, Plaque, Plaque accumulation, Plaque formation, Porphyromonas, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Present study, Prevotella intermedia, Qpcr, Quirynen, Quirynen bollen, Quirynen listgarten, Recent study, Renvert, Rough implants, Rough surface, Rough surfaces, Roughness, Severe periodontitis, Steenberghe, Subgingival, Subgingival implant microbiota, Subgingival microbiota, Subgroup, Surface roughness, Systematic review, Tanerella forsythia, Teughels, Time point, Titanium, Titanium implants, Tiunite, Tiunite surface, Wennerberg, Winkelhoff.
Abstract
Most current implants have a moderately rough surface (compared with older minimally rough “turned” implants) to facilitate osseointegration. This randomized controlled trial (RCT), with split‐mouth design, examined whether this increased surface roughness influenced the initial subgingival plaque formation.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02255.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:122C2C7C3849C84F4AC4842B303D556FA2A22FE1Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">RCT comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 2: microbial observations</title><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M." last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Research group for Microbial Adhesion, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of PeriodontologyCatholic University Leuven,Kapucijnenvoer 33 3000 Leuven,BelgiumTel.: +32 16 33 24 83Fax 32 16 33 24 84e‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: marc.quirynen@med.kuleuven.be</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Assche, N" sort="Van Assche, N" uniqKey="Van Assche N" first="N." last="Van Assche">N. Van Assche</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:122C2C7C3849C84F4AC4842B303D556FA2A22FE1</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02255.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/122C2C7C3849C84F4AC4842B303D556FA2A22FE1/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000899</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000899</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main"><hi rend="fc">RCT</hi> comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 2: microbial observations</title><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M." last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Research group for Microbial Adhesion, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of PeriodontologyCatholic University Leuven,Kapucijnenvoer 33 3000 Leuven,BelgiumTel.: +32 16 33 24 83Fax 32 16 33 24 84e‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: marc.quirynen@med.kuleuven.be</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Assche, N" sort="Van Assche, N" uniqKey="Van Assche N" first="N." last="Van Assche">N. Van Assche</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="625">625</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="634">634</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope><date type="published" when="2012-05">2012-05</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Actinomycetemcomitans</term><term>Adhesion</term><term>Aerobic</term><term>Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans</term><term>Albrektsson wennerberg</term><term>Anaerobic</term><term>Anaerobic species</term><term>Assche</term><term>Bacterial adhesion</term><term>Boever</term><term>Bollen</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Checkerboard</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Colonization</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental research</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Detection frequency</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous group</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Entire period</term><term>Forsythia</term><term>Gingivalis</term><term>Higher concentration</term><term>Higher detection frequency</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant surfaces</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Initial colonization</term><term>Intermedia</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>John wiley sons quirynen</term><term>Leonhardt</term><term>Microbial</term><term>Microbiological</term><term>Microbiota</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Nucleatum</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Pathogen</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontitis</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Periodontopathogens</term><term>Plaque</term><term>Plaque accumulation</term><term>Plaque formation</term><term>Porphyromonas</term><term>Porphyromonas gingivalis</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prevotella intermedia</term><term>Qpcr</term><term>Quirynen</term><term>Quirynen bollen</term><term>Quirynen listgarten</term><term>Recent study</term><term>Renvert</term><term>Rough implants</term><term>Rough surface</term><term>Rough surfaces</term><term>Roughness</term><term>Severe periodontitis</term><term>Steenberghe</term><term>Subgingival</term><term>Subgingival implant microbiota</term><term>Subgingival microbiota</term><term>Subgroup</term><term>Surface roughness</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Tanerella forsythia</term><term>Teughels</term><term>Time point</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Tiunite</term><term>Tiunite surface</term><term>Wennerberg</term><term>Winkelhoff</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Actinomycetemcomitans</term><term>Adhesion</term><term>Aerobic</term><term>Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans</term><term>Albrektsson wennerberg</term><term>Anaerobic</term><term>Anaerobic species</term><term>Assche</term><term>Bacterial adhesion</term><term>Boever</term><term>Bollen</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Checkerboard</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Colonization</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental research</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Detection frequency</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous group</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Entire period</term><term>Forsythia</term><term>Gingivalis</term><term>Higher concentration</term><term>Higher detection frequency</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant surfaces</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Initial colonization</term><term>Intermedia</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>John wiley sons quirynen</term><term>Leonhardt</term><term>Microbial</term><term>Microbiological</term><term>Microbiota</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Nucleatum</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Pathogen</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontitis</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Periodontopathogens</term><term>Plaque</term><term>Plaque accumulation</term><term>Plaque formation</term><term>Porphyromonas</term><term>Porphyromonas gingivalis</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prevotella intermedia</term><term>Qpcr</term><term>Quirynen</term><term>Quirynen bollen</term><term>Quirynen listgarten</term><term>Recent study</term><term>Renvert</term><term>Rough implants</term><term>Rough surface</term><term>Rough surfaces</term><term>Roughness</term><term>Severe periodontitis</term><term>Steenberghe</term><term>Subgingival</term><term>Subgingival implant microbiota</term><term>Subgingival microbiota</term><term>Subgroup</term><term>Surface roughness</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Tanerella forsythia</term><term>Teughels</term><term>Time point</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Tiunite</term><term>Tiunite surface</term><term>Wennerberg</term><term>Winkelhoff</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Most current implants have a moderately rough surface (compared with older minimally rough “turned” implants) to facilitate osseointegration. This randomized controlled trial (RCT), with split‐mouth design, examined whether this increased surface roughness influenced the initial subgingival plaque formation.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>quirynen</json:string><json:string>subgingival</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>microbiota</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>gingivalis</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>qpcr</json:string><json:string>tiunite</json:string><json:string>periodontitis</json:string><json:string>actinomycetemcomitans</json:string><json:string>assche</json:string><json:string>pathogen</json:string><json:string>periodontology</json:string><json:string>subgingival microbiota</json:string><json:string>colonization</json:string><json:string>intermedia</json:string><json:string>bollen</json:string><json:string>checkerboard</json:string><json:string>boever</json:string><json:string>forsythia</json:string><json:string>surface roughness</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>impl</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>nucleatum</json:string><json:string>implant surfaces</json:string><json:string>abutment connection</json:string><json:string>microbiological</json:string><json:string>steenberghe</json:string><json:string>clinical periodontology</json:string><json:string>subgroup</json:string><json:string>periodontal</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>renvert</json:string><json:string>porphyromonas</json:string><json:string>winkelhoff</json:string><json:string>periodontopathogens</json:string><json:string>plaque</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>wennerberg</json:string><json:string>leonhardt</json:string><json:string>porphyromonas gingivalis</json:string><json:string>teughels</json:string><json:string>quirynen bollen</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>tiunite surface</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>anaerobic</json:string><json:string>entire period</json:string><json:string>prevotella intermedia</json:string><json:string>plaque formation</json:string><json:string>rough surfaces</json:string><json:string>edentulous group</json:string><json:string>detection frequency</json:string><json:string>titanium</json:string><json:string>microbial</json:string><json:string>roughness</json:string><json:string>time point</json:string><json:string>bacterial adhesion</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons quirynen</json:string><json:string>rough implants</json:string><json:string>higher concentration</json:string><json:string>titanium implants</json:string><json:string>aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>aerobic</json:string><json:string>plaque accumulation</json:string><json:string>anaerobic species</json:string><json:string>initial colonization</json:string><json:string>recent study</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>higher detection frequency</json:string><json:string>nobel biocare</json:string><json:string>albrektsson wennerberg</json:string><json:string>subgingival implant microbiota</json:string><json:string>dental research</json:string><json:string>quirynen listgarten</json:string><json:string>rough surface</json:string><json:string>tanerella forsythia</json:string><json:string>systematic review</json:string><json:string>severe periodontitis</json:string><json:string>adhesion</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>M. Quirynen</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string><json:string>Research group for Microbial Adhesion, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string><json:string>Department of PeriodontologyCatholic University Leuven,Kapucijnenvoer 33 3000 Leuven,BelgiumTel.: +32 16 33 24 83Fax 32 16 33 24 84e‐mail:</json:string><json:string>E-mail: marc.quirynen@med.kuleuven.be</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>N. Van Assche</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>biofilm</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>moderately rough</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>surface roughness</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>subgingival colonization</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR2255</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-KN3D0PX0-0</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Most current implants have a moderately rough surface (compared with older minimally rough “turned” implants) to facilitate osseointegration. This randomized controlled trial (RCT), with split‐mouth design, examined whether this increased surface roughness influenced the initial subgingival plaque formation.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.456</score><pdfWordCount>7425</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>49884</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>38</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>309</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>RCT comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 2: microbial observations</title><pmid><json:string>22093076</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>23</volume><issue>5</issue><pages><first>625</first><last>634</last><total>10</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Original Article</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2011-08-31</json:string><json:string>16S</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Roche Diagnostics</json:string><json:string>Belgium Tel</json:string><json:string>Biotech</json:string><json:string>Bio-Rad Life Science Research, Hercules, CA, USA</json:string><json:string>Catholic University</json:string><json:string>Department of Periodontology Catholic University Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer</json:string><json:string>Belgium RCT</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>N.Van Assche</json:string><json:string>Culture</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Van Assche</json:string><json:string>M. Quirynen</json:string><json:string>Detection</json:string><json:string>P. Intermedia</json:string><json:string>Recent</json:string><json:string>A. Actinomycetemcomitans</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Foster City</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Mannheim</json:string><json:string>Madison</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>CA</json:string><json:string>MA</json:string><json:string>Leuven</json:string><json:string>WI</json:string><json:string>Cambridge</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Belgium</json:string><json:string>Netherlands</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Bollen et al.1996</json:string><json:string>Roynesdal et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 1993</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Becker et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Shalabi et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Sardin et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Apse et al. 1989</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 1996a</json:string><json:string>Leonhardt et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Siegrist et al. 1991</json:string><json:string>Renvert & Persson 2009</json:string><json:string>Al Zahrani 2008</json:string><json:string>Kohal et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Hannig & Hannig 2009</json:string><json:string>Sachdeo et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Yoshinari et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Morge et al. 1989</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Al Nawas & Gotz 2003</json:string><json:string>Salvi et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Wu-Yuan et al.1995</json:string><json:string>Matto et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Renvert et al. (2007)</json:string><json:string>Quirynen & Bollen 1995</json:string><json:string>Mager et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Boutaga et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Teughels et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Karoussis et al. (2007)</json:string><json:string>Leonhardt et al. 1993, 1999</json:string><json:string>Leonhardt et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Amoroso et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Ong et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Albouy et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Rocci et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Oste et al. 1981</json:string><json:string>Steinberg et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Emrani et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Glauser et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Rimondini et al. (1997)</json:string><json:string>Rimondini et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Van Assche et al.</json:string><json:string>Wennerberg et al. (2003)</json:string><json:string>Watzak et al. (2006)</json:string><json:string>Van Assche et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Astrand et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Shelburne et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Papaioannou et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Sumida et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Hultin et al.2002</json:string><json:string>Rasperini et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Keller et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>De Boever & De Boever 2006</json:string><json:string>De Boever et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Lee et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Furst et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Wennerberg et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Bollen et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Albrektsson & Wennerberg 2004</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 1996b</json:string><json:string>Burgers et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Renvert et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Elter et al. (2008)</json:string><json:string>Kalykakis et al. (1998)</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Boutaga et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Elter et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>van Winkelhoff et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Mombelli et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Hallman et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Bollen et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Sbordone et al. 1999</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-KN3D0PX0-0</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02255.x</json:string></doi><id>122C2C7C3849C84F4AC4842B303D556FA2A22FE1</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/122C2C7C3849C84F4AC4842B303D556FA2A22FE1/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/122C2C7C3849C84F4AC4842B303D556FA2A22FE1/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/122C2C7C3849C84F4AC4842B303D556FA2A22FE1/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main"><hi rend="fc">RCT</hi> comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 2: microbial observations</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Wiley Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><licence>© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2012-05"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main"><hi rend="fc">RCT</hi> comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 2: microbial observations</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">M.</forename><surname>Quirynen</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Periodontology</orgName><orgName>Catholic University Leuven</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Leuven</settlement><country key="BE">Belgium</country></address></affiliation><affiliation><orgName>Research group for Microbial Adhesion</orgName><orgName>Catholic University Leuven</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Leuven</settlement><country key="BE">Belgium</country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Corresponding author: Prof. M. Quirynen Department of Periodontology Catholic University Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33 3000 Leuven, Belgium Tel.: +32 16 33 24 83 Fax 32 16 33 24 84 e‐mail: marc.quirynen@med.kuleuven.be</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">N.</forename><surname>Assche</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Periodontology</orgName><orgName>Catholic University Leuven</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Leuven</settlement><country key="BE">Belgium</country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">122C2C7C3849C84F4AC4842B303D556FA2A22FE1</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-KN3D0PX0-0</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02255.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR2255</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR2255.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2012.23.issue-5</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="625">625</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="634">634</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope><date type="published" when="2012-05"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract style="main" xml:id="clr2255-abs-0001"><head>Abstract</head>
Background
<p>Most current implants have a moderately rough surface (compared with older minimally rough “turned” implants) to facilitate osseointegration. This randomized controlled trial (<hi rend="fc">RCT</hi>), with split‐mouth design, examined whether this increased surface roughness influenced the initial subgingival plaque formation.</p>
Material and methods
<p>Ten fully edentulous and eight partially edentulous patients, all with a history of severe periodontitis, received 4–6 implants (mandible or maxilla). Per jaw, both minimally (turned) and moderately rough (<hi rend="fc">TiUnite</hi>) implants (<hi rend="fc">MKIII</hi>; <hi rend="fc">N</hi>obel <hi rend="fc">B</hi>iocare) were alternated. Also, the healing and final abutments had similar surface characteristics. Subgingival biofilm formation was followed up for 1 year, and samples were analyzed by culture technique, <hi rend="fc">qPCR</hi> and checkerboard</p>
Results
<p>Over the entire period, no statistically significant differences could be detected in subgingival microbiota between the minimally and moderately rough surfaces. In partially edentulous patients, the biofilm matured to a higher concentration of pathogens when compared with fully edentulous patients. The subgingival implant composition and concentration in partially edentulous patients were comparable to the subgingival microbiota along teeth.</p>
Conclusion
<p>The roughness of the more modern implants did not influence the biofilm formation during the first year of implant loading.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords><term xml:id="clr2255-kwd-0001">biofilm</term><term xml:id="clr2255-kwd-0002">implant</term><term xml:id="clr2255-kwd-0003">moderately rough</term><term xml:id="clr2255-kwd-0004">surface roughness</term><term xml:id="clr2255-kwd-0005">subgingival colonization</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Original Article</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/122C2C7C3849C84F4AC4842B303D556FA2A22FE1/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:id="clr2255" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title type="short">Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="05105"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2012.23.issue-5</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering number="23" type="journalVolume">23</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">5</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-05">May 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="15" status="forIssue" type="article"><doi>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02255.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR2255"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count number="10" type="pageTotal"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Original Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event date="2011-05-17" type="manuscriptAccepted"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2011-08-31" type="xmlCreated"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2011-11-17" type="xmlCorrected"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2011-11-17"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-11-17"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-04-10"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">625</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">634</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><lineatedText><line><b>Corresponding author:</b></line><line><i>Prof. M. Quirynen</i></line><line>Department of Periodontology</line><line>Catholic University Leuven,</line><line>Kapucijnenvoer 33 3000 Leuven,</line><line>Belgium</line><line>Tel.: +32 16 33 24 83</line><line>Fax 32 16 33 24 84</line><line>e‐mail: <email>marc.quirynen@med.kuleuven.be</email></line></lineatedText></correspondenceTo><selfCitationGroup><citation type="self" xml:id="clr2255-cit-0078"><author><familyName>Quirynen</familyName> <givenNames>M</givenNames></author>, <author><familyNamePrefix>Van Assche</familyNamePrefix> <givenNames>N</givenNames></author>. <articleTitle>RCT comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 2: microbial observations</articleTitle>. <journalTitle>Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</journalTitle> <vol>23</vol> <pubYear year="2012">2012</pubYear>, <pageFirst>625</pageFirst>–<pageLast>634</pageLast>.</citation></selfCitationGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR2255.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main"><fc>RCT</fc> comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 2: microbial observations</title><title type="shortAuthors">Quirynen & Van Assche</title></titleGroup><creators><creator affiliationRef="#clr2255-aff-0001 #clr2255-aff-0002" corresponding="yes" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2255-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>M.</givenNames> <familyName>Quirynen</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr2255-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2255-cr-0002"><personName><givenNames>N.</givenNames><familyNamePrefix>Van</familyNamePrefix> <familyName>Assche</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation countryCode="BE" type="organization" xml:id="clr2255-aff-0001"><orgDiv>Department of Periodontology</orgDiv> <orgName>Catholic University Leuven</orgName> <address><city>Leuven</city> <country>Belgium</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="BE" type="organization" xml:id="clr2255-aff-0002"><orgDiv>Research group for Microbial Adhesion</orgDiv> <orgName>Catholic University Leuven</orgName> <address><city>Leuven</city> <country>Belgium</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="clr2255-kwd-0001">biofilm</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2255-kwd-0002">implant</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2255-kwd-0003">moderately rough</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2255-kwd-0004">surface roughness</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2255-kwd-0005">subgingival colonization</keyword></keywordGroup><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>Nobel Biocare</fundingAgency><fundingNumber>#2003‐144</fundingNumber></fundingInfo><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:id="clr2255-abs-0001"><title type="main">Abstract</title><section xml:id="clr2255-sec-0001"><title type="main">Background</title><p>Most current implants have a moderately rough surface (compared with older minimally rough “turned” implants) to facilitate osseointegration. This randomized controlled trial (<fc>RCT</fc>), with split‐mouth design, examined whether this increased surface roughness influenced the initial subgingival plaque formation.</p></section><section xml:id="clr2255-sec-0002"><title type="main">Material and methods</title><p>Ten fully edentulous and eight partially edentulous patients, all with a history of severe periodontitis, received 4–6 implants (mandible or maxilla). Per jaw, both minimally (turned) and moderately rough (<fc>TiUnite</fc>) implants (<fc>MKIII</fc>; <fc>N</fc>obel <fc>B</fc>iocare) were alternated. Also, the healing and final abutments had similar surface characteristics. Subgingival biofilm formation was followed up for 1 year, and samples were analyzed by culture technique, <fc>qPCR</fc> and checkerboard</p></section><section xml:id="clr2255-sec-0003"><title type="main">Results</title><p>Over the entire period, no statistically significant differences could be detected in subgingival microbiota between the minimally and moderately rough surfaces. In partially edentulous patients, the biofilm matured to a higher concentration of pathogens when compared with fully edentulous patients. The subgingival implant composition and concentration in partially edentulous patients were comparable to the subgingival microbiota along teeth.</p></section><section xml:id="clr2255-sec-0004"><title type="main">Conclusion</title><p>The roughness of the more modern implants did not influence the biofilm formation during the first year of implant loading.</p></section></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>RCT comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 2: microbial observations</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>RCT comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 2: microbial observations</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Quirynen</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><affiliation>Research group for Microbial Adhesion, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><affiliation>Department of PeriodontologyCatholic University Leuven,Kapucijnenvoer 33 3000 Leuven,BelgiumTel.: +32 16 33 24 83Fax 32 16 33 24 84e‐mail:</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: marc.quirynen@med.kuleuven.be</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">N.</namePart><namePart type="family">Van Assche</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-05</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2011-08-31</dateCreated><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2011-05-17</dateValid><edition>Quirynen M, Van Assche N. RCT comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 2: microbial observations. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23 2012, 625–634.</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract>Most current implants have a moderately rough surface (compared with older minimally rough “turned” implants) to facilitate osseointegration. This randomized controlled trial (RCT), with split‐mouth design, examined whether this increased surface roughness influenced the initial subgingival plaque formation.</abstract><abstract>Ten fully edentulous and eight partially edentulous patients, all with a history of severe periodontitis, received 4–6 implants (mandible or maxilla). Per jaw, both minimally (turned) and moderately rough (TiUnite) implants (MKIII; Nobel Biocare) were alternated. Also, the healing and final abutments had similar surface characteristics. Subgingival biofilm formation was followed up for 1 year, and samples were analyzed by culture technique, qPCR and checkerboard</abstract><abstract>Over the entire period, no statistically significant differences could be detected in subgingival microbiota between the minimally and moderately rough surfaces. In partially edentulous patients, the biofilm matured to a higher concentration of pathogens when compared with fully edentulous patients. The subgingival implant composition and concentration in partially edentulous patients were comparable to the subgingival microbiota along teeth.</abstract><abstract>The roughness of the more modern implants did not influence the biofilm formation during the first year of implant loading.</abstract><note type="funding">Nobel Biocare - No. #2003‐144; </note><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>biofilm</topic><topic>implant</topic><topic>moderately rough</topic><topic>surface roughness</topic><topic>subgingival colonization</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Original Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>23</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>5</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>625</start><end>634</end><total>10</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">122C2C7C3849C84F4AC4842B303D556FA2A22FE1</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-KN3D0PX0-0</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02255.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR2255</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/122C2C7C3849C84F4AC4842B303D556FA2A22FE1/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000899 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000899 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:122C2C7C3849C84F4AC4842B303D556FA2A22FE1
|texte= RCT comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 2: microbial observations
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |