Implant Treatment in the Edentulous Maxillae: A 15‐Year Follow‐Up Study on 76 Consecutive Patients Provided with Fixed Prostheses
Identifieur interne : 000808 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000807; suivant : 000809Implant Treatment in the Edentulous Maxillae: A 15‐Year Follow‐Up Study on 76 Consecutive Patients Provided with Fixed Prostheses
Auteurs : Torsten Jemt ; Jesper JohanssonSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2006-06.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Albrektsson, Average bone loss, Bone level, Bone loss, Bone resorption, Clin, Clin periodontol, Clinical dentistry, Clinical implant dentistry, Continuous bone loss, Dental implants, Dentistry, Dropout, Edentulous, Edentulous maxillae, Edentulous patients, Failure rate, Fracture, Health service, Implant, Implant failures, Implant treatment, Jemt, Lekholm, Marginal bone loss, Maxillofac, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Present study, Prosthesis, Prosthesis placement, Prosthodont, Resin veneers, Resorption, Veneer, Zarb.
- Teeft :
- Albrektsson, Average bone loss, Bone level, Bone loss, Bone resorption, Clin, Clin periodontol, Clinical dentistry, Clinical implant dentistry, Continuous bone loss, Dental implants, Dentistry, Dropout, Edentulous, Edentulous maxillae, Edentulous patients, Failure rate, Fracture, Health service, Implant, Implant failures, Implant treatment, Jemt, Lekholm, Marginal bone loss, Maxillofac, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Present study, Prosthesis, Prosthesis placement, Prosthodont, Resin veneers, Resorption, Veneer, Zarb.
Abstract
Background: Few long‐term follow‐up studies are available on implant treatment based on patient level data related to time.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00003.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:107829668B8C2802F4F04A0D964E0ACDF49ED61DLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Implant Treatment in the Edentulous Maxillae: A 15‐Year Follow‐Up Study on 76 Consecutive Patients Provided with Fixed Prostheses</title><author><name sortKey="Jemt, Torsten" sort="Jemt, Torsten" uniqKey="Jemt T" first="Torsten" last="Jemt">Torsten Jemt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Chairman, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: torsten.jemt@vgregion.se</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Johansson, Jesper" sort="Johansson, Jesper" uniqKey="Johansson J" first="Jesper" last="Johansson">Jesper Johansson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>assistant professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:107829668B8C2802F4F04A0D964E0ACDF49ED61D</idno><date when="2006" year="2006">2006</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00003.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/107829668B8C2802F4F04A0D964E0ACDF49ED61D/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000808</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000808</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Implant Treatment in the Edentulous Maxillae: A 15‐Year Follow‐Up Study on 76 Consecutive Patients Provided with Fixed Prostheses</title><author><name sortKey="Jemt, Torsten" sort="Jemt, Torsten" uniqKey="Jemt T" first="Torsten" last="Jemt">Torsten Jemt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Chairman, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: torsten.jemt@vgregion.se</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Johansson, Jesper" sort="Johansson, Jesper" uniqKey="Johansson J" first="Jesper" last="Johansson">Jesper Johansson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>assistant professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">8</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="61">61</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="69">69</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2006-06">2006-06</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Albrektsson</term><term>Average bone loss</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone resorption</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical dentistry</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Continuous bone loss</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Dropout</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous maxillae</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Failure rate</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Health service</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failures</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Jemt</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis placement</term><term>Prosthodont</term><term>Resin veneers</term><term>Resorption</term><term>Veneer</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Albrektsson</term><term>Average bone loss</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone resorption</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical dentistry</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Continuous bone loss</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Dropout</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous maxillae</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Failure rate</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Health service</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failures</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Jemt</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis placement</term><term>Prosthodont</term><term>Resin veneers</term><term>Resorption</term><term>Veneer</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Background: Few long‐term follow‐up studies are available on implant treatment based on patient level data related to time.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>implant failures</json:string><json:string>jemt</json:string><json:string>dropout</json:string><json:string>implant treatment</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>zarb</json:string><json:string>lekholm</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated</json:string><json:string>albrektsson</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>resorption</json:string><json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string><json:string>maxillofac</json:string><json:string>prosthodont</json:string><json:string>average bone loss</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>bone level</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>edentulous maxillae</json:string><json:string>veneer</json:string><json:string>resin veneers</json:string><json:string>clinical dentistry</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>prosthesis placement</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>fracture</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>failure rate</json:string><json:string>health service</json:string><json:string>continuous bone loss</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>bone resorption</json:string><json:string>clin periodontol</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Torsten Jemt DDS, Odont Dr/PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Chairman, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden;</json:string><json:string>professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden;</json:string><json:string>E-mail: torsten.jemt@vgregion.se</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Jesper Johansson DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>assistant professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bone loss</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>complications</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>edentulism</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>failures</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>fixed prostheses</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>long‐term follow up</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>upper jaw</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID003</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-6K4DBR04-G</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Background: Few long‐term follow‐up studies are available on implant treatment based on patient level data related to time.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.699</score><pdfWordCount>4483</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>28777</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>585 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>18</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>124</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>8</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Implant Treatment in the Edentulous Maxillae: A 15‐Year Follow‐Up Study on 76 Consecutive Patients Provided with Fixed Prostheses</title><pmid><json:string>16774591</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>61</first><last>69</last><total>9</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2006</json:string><json:string>1970s</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Blackwell Publishing, Inc.</json:string><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, The Sahlgrenska Academy</json:string><json:string>Göteborg University</json:string><json:string>Sweden Reprint</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Fransson</json:string><json:string>Minimum</json:string><json:string>Torsten Jemt</json:string><json:string>Lost</json:string><json:string>Albrektsson</json:string><json:string>Dropout</json:string><json:string>Implants</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-6K4DBR04-G</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2006</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2006</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00003.x</json:string></doi><id>107829668B8C2802F4F04A0D964E0ACDF49ED61D</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/107829668B8C2802F4F04A0D964E0ACDF49ED61D/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/107829668B8C2802F4F04A0D964E0ACDF49ED61D/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/107829668B8C2802F4F04A0D964E0ACDF49ED61D/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Implant Treatment in the Edentulous Maxillae: A 15‐Year Follow‐Up Study on 76 Consecutive Patients Provided with Fixed Prostheses</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2006-06"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Implant Treatment in the Edentulous Maxillae: A 15‐Year Follow‐Up Study on 76 Consecutive Patients Provided with Fixed Prostheses</title><title level="a" type="short">Implant Treatment in the Edentulous Maxillae</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Torsten</forename><surname>Jemt</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, Odont Dr/PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Chairman, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden;<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden;<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Reprint requests: Dr. Torsten Jemt, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Medicinaregatan 12 C S‐413 90 Göteborg, Sweden; e‐mail: torsten.jemt@vgregion.se</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Jesper</forename><surname>Johansson</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>assistant professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">107829668B8C2802F4F04A0D964E0ACDF49ED61D</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-6K4DBR04-G</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00003.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID003</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID003.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2006.8.issue-2</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">8</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="61">61</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="69">69</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2006-06"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p><hi rend="bold">Background: </hi> Few long‐term follow‐up studies are available on implant treatment based on patient level data related to time.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Purpose </hi> The aim of this study was to report 15‐year patient‐based data in relation to time of follow up after treatment with fixed prostheses supported by implants in the edentulous upper jaw.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and Methods </hi> Seventy‐six edentulous consecutive patients, provided with 450 turned Brånemark implants, were followed up with regard to maintenance, complications, and radiographs taken during the follow‐up period.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results </hi> Forty‐four patients provided with 247 implants were lost to follow up. Patients followed up for 15 years showed as a group a trend of better implant survival than patients lost to follow up (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> > .05). Altogether, 37 implants and 5 fixed prostheses failed during the follow‐up period. Most implants were lost at abutment surgery (<hi rend="italic">n</hi>− 15) and another nine during the first year of function. The 15‐year implant and fixed prosthesis cumulative survival rate was 90.9 and 90.6%, respectively. Resin veneer fractures caused most problems, more frequent in the earlier stage while severe wear increased in the later stage of follow up. No implant fractures or loosening of abutment/bridge locking screws were noted. The mean marginal bone loss was 0.5 mm (SD 0.47) after 5 years, followed by only minimal average changes during the following years. No radiographic parameter showed any time‐dependent relationship. The percentage of patients presenting at least one implant with more than 2.0‐mm bone loss was 4.9% in the interval from 0 to 5 years and 4.0% between 10 and 15 years. Only 1.3% of implants showed >3.0 mm accumulated bone loss after 15 years.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion </hi> Implant treatment in the edentulous upper jaw functions well in a 15‐year time perspective, but an insignificant trend of higher implant failures was observed for patients lost to follow up. Besides wear and fractures of veneers, no other parameter showed any time‐related relationship, indicating an increased risk for more complications during later stages of follow up. However, accumulation of smaller amount of bone loss during the years resulted in an increasing number of implants and patients with bone levels below the third thread, which could be speculated to increase future maintenance after 15 years.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">bone loss</term><term xml:id="k2">complications</term><term xml:id="k3">edentulism</term><term xml:id="k4">failures</term><term xml:id="k5">fixed prostheses</term><term xml:id="k6">implants</term><term xml:id="k7">long‐term follow up</term><term xml:id="k8">upper jaw</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>ARTICLES</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/107829668B8C2802F4F04A0D964E0ACDF49ED61D/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisherName><publisherLoc>Malden, USA</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="06002"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.2006.8.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="8">8</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2006-06">June 2006</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="1" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00003.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID003"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="9"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2006-06-15"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2006-06-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.5 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-04-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="61">61</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="69">69</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Reprint requests: Dr. Torsten Jemt, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Medicinaregatan 12 C S‐413 90 Göteborg, Sweden; e‐mail: <email>torsten.jemt@vgregion.se</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID003.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="9"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="31"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="5524"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Implant Treatment in the Edentulous Maxillae: A 15‐Year Follow‐Up Study on 76 Consecutive Patients Provided with Fixed Prostheses</title><title type="shortAuthors">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Volume 8, Number 2, 2006</title><title type="short">Implant Treatment in the Edentulous Maxillae</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1 #a2" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Torsten</givenNames><familyName>Jemt</familyName><degrees>DDS, Odont Dr/PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Jesper</givenNames><familyName>Johansson</familyName><degrees>DDS</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Chairman, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>assistant professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">bone loss</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">complications</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">edentulism</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">failures</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">fixed prostheses</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k7">long‐term follow up</keyword><keyword xml:id="k8">upper jaw</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p><b>Background: </b> Few long‐term follow‐up studies are available on implant treatment based on patient level data related to time.</p><p><b>Purpose </b> The aim of this study was to report 15‐year patient‐based data in relation to time of follow up after treatment with fixed prostheses supported by implants in the edentulous upper jaw.</p><p><b>Materials and Methods </b> Seventy‐six edentulous consecutive patients, provided with 450 turned Brånemark implants, were followed up with regard to maintenance, complications, and radiographs taken during the follow‐up period.</p><p><b>Results </b> Forty‐four patients provided with 247 implants were lost to follow up. Patients followed up for 15 years showed as a group a trend of better implant survival than patients lost to follow up (<i>p</i> > .05). Altogether, 37 implants and 5 fixed prostheses failed during the follow‐up period. Most implants were lost at abutment surgery (<i>n</i>− 15) and another nine during the first year of function. The 15‐year implant and fixed prosthesis cumulative survival rate was 90.9 and 90.6%, respectively. Resin veneer fractures caused most problems, more frequent in the earlier stage while severe wear increased in the later stage of follow up. No implant fractures or loosening of abutment/bridge locking screws were noted. The mean marginal bone loss was 0.5 mm (SD 0.47) after 5 years, followed by only minimal average changes during the following years. No radiographic parameter showed any time‐dependent relationship. The percentage of patients presenting at least one implant with more than 2.0‐mm bone loss was 4.9% in the interval from 0 to 5 years and 4.0% between 10 and 15 years. Only 1.3% of implants showed >3.0 mm accumulated bone loss after 15 years.</p><p><b>Conclusion </b> Implant treatment in the edentulous upper jaw functions well in a 15‐year time perspective, but an insignificant trend of higher implant failures was observed for patients lost to follow up. Besides wear and fractures of veneers, no other parameter showed any time‐related relationship, indicating an increased risk for more complications during later stages of follow up. However, accumulation of smaller amount of bone loss during the years resulted in an increasing number of implants and patients with bone levels below the third thread, which could be speculated to increase future maintenance after 15 years.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Implant Treatment in the Edentulous Maxillae: A 15‐Year Follow‐Up Study on 76 Consecutive Patients Provided with Fixed Prostheses</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Implant Treatment in the Edentulous Maxillae</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Implant Treatment in the Edentulous Maxillae: A 15‐Year Follow‐Up Study on 76 Consecutive Patients Provided with Fixed Prostheses</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Torsten</namePart><namePart type="family">Jemt</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, Odont Dr/PhD</namePart><affiliation>Chairman, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden;</affiliation><affiliation>professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden;</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: torsten.jemt@vgregion.se</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Jesper</namePart><namePart type="family">Johansson</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>assistant professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Malden, USA</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2006-06</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2006</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">0</extent><extent unit="tables">9</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">31</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">5524</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Background: Few long‐term follow‐up studies are available on implant treatment based on patient level data related to time.</abstract><abstract>Purpose The aim of this study was to report 15‐year patient‐based data in relation to time of follow up after treatment with fixed prostheses supported by implants in the edentulous upper jaw.</abstract><abstract>Materials and Methods Seventy‐six edentulous consecutive patients, provided with 450 turned Brånemark implants, were followed up with regard to maintenance, complications, and radiographs taken during the follow‐up period.</abstract><abstract>Results Forty‐four patients provided with 247 implants were lost to follow up. Patients followed up for 15 years showed as a group a trend of better implant survival than patients lost to follow up (p > .05). Altogether, 37 implants and 5 fixed prostheses failed during the follow‐up period. Most implants were lost at abutment surgery (n− 15) and another nine during the first year of function. The 15‐year implant and fixed prosthesis cumulative survival rate was 90.9 and 90.6%, respectively. Resin veneer fractures caused most problems, more frequent in the earlier stage while severe wear increased in the later stage of follow up. No implant fractures or loosening of abutment/bridge locking screws were noted. The mean marginal bone loss was 0.5 mm (SD 0.47) after 5 years, followed by only minimal average changes during the following years. No radiographic parameter showed any time‐dependent relationship. The percentage of patients presenting at least one implant with more than 2.0‐mm bone loss was 4.9% in the interval from 0 to 5 years and 4.0% between 10 and 15 years. Only 1.3% of implants showed >3.0 mm accumulated bone loss after 15 years.</abstract><abstract>Conclusion Implant treatment in the edentulous upper jaw functions well in a 15‐year time perspective, but an insignificant trend of higher implant failures was observed for patients lost to follow up. Besides wear and fractures of veneers, no other parameter showed any time‐related relationship, indicating an increased risk for more complications during later stages of follow up. However, accumulation of smaller amount of bone loss during the years resulted in an increasing number of implants and patients with bone levels below the third thread, which could be speculated to increase future maintenance after 15 years.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>bone loss</topic><topic>complications</topic><topic>edentulism</topic><topic>failures</topic><topic>fixed prostheses</topic><topic>implants</topic><topic>long‐term follow up</topic><topic>upper jaw</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2006</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>8</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>61</start><end>69</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">107829668B8C2802F4F04A0D964E0ACDF49ED61D</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-6K4DBR04-G</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00003.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID003</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Inc</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/107829668B8C2802F4F04A0D964E0ACDF49ED61D/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000808 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000808 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:107829668B8C2802F4F04A0D964E0ACDF49ED61D
|texte= Implant Treatment in the Edentulous Maxillae: A 15‐Year Follow‐Up Study on 76 Consecutive Patients Provided with Fixed Prostheses
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |