One‐Stage Operative Procedure Using Two Different Implant Systems: A Prospective Study on Implant Overdentures in the Edentulous Mandible
Identifieur interne : 000793 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000792; suivant : 000794One‐Stage Operative Procedure Using Two Different Implant Systems: A Prospective Study on Implant Overdentures in the Edentulous Mandible
Auteurs : Andrew Tawse-Smith ; Alan G. T. Payne ; Rohana Kumara ; W. Murray ThomsonSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2001-10.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Anterior mandible, Bacterial contamination, Ball abutment, Ball abutments, Baseline, Bicortical anchorage, Bone loss, Bone quantity, Brinemark, Brinemark fixtures, Brinemark implants, Brinemark zarb, Cert perio, Clin, Clinical dentistry, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical overdenture research project, Clinical study, Dental implant system, Dentistry, Denture, Different implant systems, Edentulous, Edentulous mandible, Elderly patients, First year, Generous relief, Healing abutments, Implant, Implant overdentures, Implant placement, Implant surfaces, Implant systems, Implant type, Keratinized mucosa, Lekholm, Longitudinal study, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular dentures, Mandibular implant overdentures, Mandibular overdentures, Marginal bone levels, Marginal bone loss, Maxillofac, Mucosal enlargement, Nobel biocare, Operative procedure, Operative technique, Oral implants, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral rehabilitation, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Osseointegrated titanium implants, Other studies, Overdentures, Periotest, Periotest values, Plaque accumulation, Present study, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Prosthodontic, Prosthodontic procedures, Prosthodontic treatment, Radiograph, Radiographic, Radiographical features, Reference point, Relative attachment levels, Respective matrices, Respective patrices, Retrospective study, Significant changes, Significant difference, Significant differences, Southern implant system, Southern implant systems, Southern implants, Southern implants fixtures, Standard healing period, Success grade, Success rate, Success rates, Surgical, Surgical placement, Tissue conditioner, Tissue integration, Titanium, Titanium implants, Titanium surface, Titanium surfaces, Torquing forces, Unsplinted implants, Wilcoxon test, Zarb.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Anterior mandible, Bacterial contamination, Ball abutment, Ball abutments, Baseline, Bicortical anchorage, Bone loss, Bone quantity, Brinemark, Brinemark fixtures, Brinemark implants, Brinemark zarb, Cert perio, Clin, Clinical dentistry, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical overdenture research project, Clinical study, Dental implant system, Dentistry, Denture, Different implant systems, Edentulous, Edentulous mandible, Elderly patients, First year, Generous relief, Healing abutments, Implant, Implant overdentures, Implant placement, Implant surfaces, Implant systems, Implant type, Keratinized mucosa, Lekholm, Longitudinal study, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular dentures, Mandibular implant overdentures, Mandibular overdentures, Marginal bone levels, Marginal bone loss, Maxillofac, Mucosal enlargement, Nobel biocare, Operative procedure, Operative technique, Oral implants, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral rehabilitation, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Osseointegrated titanium implants, Other studies, Overdentures, Periotest, Periotest values, Plaque accumulation, Present study, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Prosthodontic, Prosthodontic procedures, Prosthodontic treatment, Radiograph, Radiographic, Radiographical features, Reference point, Relative attachment levels, Respective matrices, Respective patrices, Retrospective study, Significant changes, Significant difference, Significant differences, Southern implant system, Southern implant systems, Southern implants, Southern implants fixtures, Standard healing period, Success grade, Success rate, Success rates, Surgical, Surgical placement, Tissue conditioner, Tissue integration, Titanium, Titanium implants, Titanium surface, Titanium surfaces, Torquing forces, Unsplinted implants, Wilcoxon test, Zarb.
Abstract
Background: Evidence‐based reports are needed to support the application of a one‐stage surgical protocol for unsplinted implants supporting mandibular overdentures. Purpose: To examine the feasibility and success of using two different dental implant systems (originally designed for two‐stage operative technique) using a one‐stage operative procedure in patients being rehabilitated with implant mandibular overdentures. Materials and Methods: The study sample involved 24 edentulous subjects (aged 55–80 yr) randomly allocated to two different implant systems, one with a machined titanium implant surface (Steri‐Oss, Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden) and the other with a roughened titanium surface (Southern Implants, Ltd., Irene, South Africa). Two unsplinted implants to support implant overdentures were placed in the anterior mandible of all patients, using a standardized one‐stage surgical and prosthodontic procedure. Primary stability and bicortical anchorage of the implants was mandatory before healing abutments were connected at the time of implant placement. Implant overdentures and their respective matrices were inserted following a standard 12‐week healing period. Data relating to mobility tests, radiographs, and peri‐implant parameters were documented at 12, 16, and 52 weeks after surgery. Results: A success rate of 95.8% for the Steri‐Oss and 100% for the Southern Implants was found, without any statistically significant differences in the marginal bone loss. Significant changes in Periotest values were observed for both types between 12 and 52 weeks (p <.001). Minor changes were observed in the peri‐implant parameters evaluated. Conclusions: These preliminary findings show a successful application of this one‐stage approach for unsplinted implants supporting mandibular overdentures with Steri‐Oss and Southern Implant Systems.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00140.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:100E8C200B566B3A5EA38136796E9774F1555BB9Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">One‐Stage Operative Procedure Using Two Different Implant Systems: A Prospective Study on Implant Overdentures in the Edentulous Mandible</title><author><name sortKey="Tawse Mith, Andrew" sort="Tawse Mith, Andrew" uniqKey="Tawse Mith A" first="Andrew" last="Tawse-Smith">Andrew Tawse-Smith</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Lecturer, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: andrew.tawse‐smith@stonebow.otago.ac.nz</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Payne, Alan G T" sort="Payne, Alan G T" uniqKey="Payne A" first="Alan G. T." last="Payne">Alan G. T. Payne</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Lecturer, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kumara, Rohana" sort="Kumara, Rohana" uniqKey="Kumara R" first="Rohana" last="Kumara">Rohana Kumara</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Thomson, W Murray" sort="Thomson, W Murray" uniqKey="Thomson W" first="W. Murray" last="Thomson">W. Murray Thomson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Health, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:100E8C200B566B3A5EA38136796E9774F1555BB9</idno><date when="2001" year="2001">2001</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00140.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/100E8C200B566B3A5EA38136796E9774F1555BB9/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000793</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000793</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">One‐Stage Operative Procedure Using Two Different Implant Systems: A Prospective Study on Implant Overdentures in the Edentulous Mandible</title><author><name sortKey="Tawse Mith, Andrew" sort="Tawse Mith, Andrew" uniqKey="Tawse Mith A" first="Andrew" last="Tawse-Smith">Andrew Tawse-Smith</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Lecturer, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: andrew.tawse‐smith@stonebow.otago.ac.nz</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Payne, Alan G T" sort="Payne, Alan G T" uniqKey="Payne A" first="Alan G. T." last="Payne">Alan G. T. Payne</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Lecturer, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kumara, Rohana" sort="Kumara, Rohana" uniqKey="Kumara R" first="Rohana" last="Kumara">Rohana Kumara</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Thomson, W Murray" sort="Thomson, W Murray" uniqKey="Thomson W" first="W. Murray" last="Thomson">W. Murray Thomson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Health, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="185">185</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="193">193</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2001-10">2001-10</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Anterior mandible</term><term>Bacterial contamination</term><term>Ball abutment</term><term>Ball abutments</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Bicortical anchorage</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone quantity</term><term>Brinemark</term><term>Brinemark fixtures</term><term>Brinemark implants</term><term>Brinemark zarb</term><term>Cert perio</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical dentistry</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical overdenture research project</term><term>Clinical study</term><term>Dental implant system</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Different implant systems</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous mandible</term><term>Elderly patients</term><term>First year</term><term>Generous relief</term><term>Healing abutments</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant overdentures</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant surfaces</term><term>Implant systems</term><term>Implant type</term><term>Keratinized mucosa</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Longitudinal study</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular dentures</term><term>Mandibular implant overdentures</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Marginal bone levels</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Mucosal enlargement</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Operative procedure</term><term>Operative technique</term><term>Oral implants</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Osseointegrated titanium implants</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Periotest</term><term>Periotest values</term><term>Plaque accumulation</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthodontic</term><term>Prosthodontic procedures</term><term>Prosthodontic treatment</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographical features</term><term>Reference point</term><term>Relative attachment levels</term><term>Respective matrices</term><term>Respective patrices</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Significant changes</term><term>Significant difference</term><term>Significant differences</term><term>Southern implant system</term><term>Southern implant systems</term><term>Southern implants</term><term>Southern implants fixtures</term><term>Standard healing period</term><term>Success grade</term><term>Success rate</term><term>Success rates</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical placement</term><term>Tissue conditioner</term><term>Tissue integration</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Titanium surface</term><term>Titanium surfaces</term><term>Torquing forces</term><term>Unsplinted implants</term><term>Wilcoxon test</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Anterior mandible</term><term>Bacterial contamination</term><term>Ball abutment</term><term>Ball abutments</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Bicortical anchorage</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone quantity</term><term>Brinemark</term><term>Brinemark fixtures</term><term>Brinemark implants</term><term>Brinemark zarb</term><term>Cert perio</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical dentistry</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical overdenture research project</term><term>Clinical study</term><term>Dental implant system</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Different implant systems</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous mandible</term><term>Elderly patients</term><term>First year</term><term>Generous relief</term><term>Healing abutments</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant overdentures</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant surfaces</term><term>Implant systems</term><term>Implant type</term><term>Keratinized mucosa</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Longitudinal study</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular dentures</term><term>Mandibular implant overdentures</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Marginal bone levels</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Mucosal enlargement</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Operative procedure</term><term>Operative technique</term><term>Oral implants</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Osseointegrated titanium implants</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Periotest</term><term>Periotest values</term><term>Plaque accumulation</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthodontic</term><term>Prosthodontic procedures</term><term>Prosthodontic treatment</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographical features</term><term>Reference point</term><term>Relative attachment levels</term><term>Respective matrices</term><term>Respective patrices</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Significant changes</term><term>Significant difference</term><term>Significant differences</term><term>Southern implant system</term><term>Southern implant systems</term><term>Southern implants</term><term>Southern implants fixtures</term><term>Standard healing period</term><term>Success grade</term><term>Success rate</term><term>Success rates</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical placement</term><term>Tissue conditioner</term><term>Tissue integration</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Titanium surface</term><term>Titanium surfaces</term><term>Torquing forces</term><term>Unsplinted implants</term><term>Wilcoxon test</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background: Evidence‐based reports are needed to support the application of a one‐stage surgical protocol for unsplinted implants supporting mandibular overdentures. Purpose: To examine the feasibility and success of using two different dental implant systems (originally designed for two‐stage operative technique) using a one‐stage operative procedure in patients being rehabilitated with implant mandibular overdentures. Materials and Methods: The study sample involved 24 edentulous subjects (aged 55–80 yr) randomly allocated to two different implant systems, one with a machined titanium implant surface (Steri‐Oss, Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden) and the other with a roughened titanium surface (Southern Implants, Ltd., Irene, South Africa). Two unsplinted implants to support implant overdentures were placed in the anterior mandible of all patients, using a standardized one‐stage surgical and prosthodontic procedure. Primary stability and bicortical anchorage of the implants was mandatory before healing abutments were connected at the time of implant placement. Implant overdentures and their respective matrices were inserted following a standard 12‐week healing period. Data relating to mobility tests, radiographs, and peri‐implant parameters were documented at 12, 16, and 52 weeks after surgery. Results: A success rate of 95.8% for the Steri‐Oss and 100% for the Southern Implants was found, without any statistically significant differences in the marginal bone loss. Significant changes in Periotest values were observed for both types between 12 and 52 weeks (p <.001). Minor changes were observed in the peri‐implant parameters evaluated. Conclusions: These preliminary findings show a successful application of this one‐stage approach for unsplinted implants supporting mandibular overdentures with Steri‐Oss and Southern Implant Systems.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>overdentures</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>brinemark</json:string><json:string>southern implants</json:string><json:string>maxillofac</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated</json:string><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>zarb</json:string><json:string>periotest</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>reference point</json:string><json:string>mandibular overdentures</json:string><json:string>healing abutments</json:string><json:string>prosthodontic</json:string><json:string>radiograph</json:string><json:string>lekholm</json:string><json:string>implant overdentures</json:string><json:string>radiographic</json:string><json:string>baseline</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>edentulous mandible</json:string><json:string>unsplinted implants</json:string><json:string>implant type</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>success rate</json:string><json:string>southern implant system</json:string><json:string>keratinized mucosa</json:string><json:string>periotest values</json:string><json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string><json:string>significant difference</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>implant systems</json:string><json:string>ball abutment</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>significant changes</json:string><json:string>mandibular implant overdentures</json:string><json:string>significant differences</json:string><json:string>different implant systems</json:string><json:string>titanium implants</json:string><json:string>bicortical anchorage</json:string><json:string>tissue conditioner</json:string><json:string>ball abutments</json:string><json:string>dental implant system</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>operative procedure</json:string><json:string>titanium</json:string><json:string>bacterial contamination</json:string><json:string>generous relief</json:string><json:string>torquing forces</json:string><json:string>prosthodontic procedures</json:string><json:string>respective patrices</json:string><json:string>nobel biocare</json:string><json:string>mucosal enlargement</json:string><json:string>elderly patients</json:string><json:string>oral rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>wilcoxon test</json:string><json:string>operative technique</json:string><json:string>success rates</json:string><json:string>cert perio</json:string><json:string>titanium surface</json:string><json:string>bone quantity</json:string><json:string>clinical dentistry</json:string><json:string>first year</json:string><json:string>marginal bone levels</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>respective matrices</json:string><json:string>clinical overdenture research project</json:string><json:string>other studies</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>plaque accumulation</json:string><json:string>relative attachment levels</json:string><json:string>southern implant systems</json:string><json:string>success grade</json:string><json:string>southern implants fixtures</json:string><json:string>surgical placement</json:string><json:string>titanium surfaces</json:string><json:string>implant surfaces</json:string><json:string>oral implants</json:string><json:string>prosthodontic treatment</json:string><json:string>clinical study</json:string><json:string>tissue integration</json:string><json:string>standard healing period</json:string><json:string>longitudinal study</json:string><json:string>anterior mandible</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated titanium implants</json:string><json:string>retrospective study</json:string><json:string>brinemark fixtures</json:string><json:string>radiographical features</json:string><json:string>brinemark implants</json:string><json:string>brinemark zarb</json:string><json:string>mandibular dentures</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Andrew Tawse‐Smith DDS, Cert Perio (Göteborg)</name><affiliations><json:string>Lecturer, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</json:string><json:string>E-mail: andrew.tawse‐smith@stonebow.otago.ac.nz</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Alan G.T. Payne BDS, MDent, FCD(SA)</name><affiliations><json:string>Lecturer, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Rohana Kumara BDS, FDSRCPS, FFDRCS, FDSRCS</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>W. Murray Thomson BDS, MComDent, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral Health, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant surfaces</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>mandibular implant overdentures</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>nonsubmerged</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>one‐stage implants</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID185</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-P3KBXFBH-8</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Background: Evidence‐based reports are needed to support the application of a one‐stage surgical protocol for unsplinted implants supporting mandibular overdentures. Purpose: To examine the feasibility and success of using two different dental implant systems (originally designed for two‐stage operative technique) using a one‐stage operative procedure in patients being rehabilitated with implant mandibular overdentures. Materials and Methods: The study sample involved 24 edentulous subjects (aged 55–80 yr) randomly allocated to two different implant systems, one with a machined titanium implant surface (Steri‐Oss, Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden) and the other with a roughened titanium surface (Southern Implants, Ltd., Irene, South Africa). Two unsplinted implants to support implant overdentures were placed in the anterior mandible of all patients, using a standardized one‐stage surgical and prosthodontic procedure. Primary stability and bicortical anchorage of the implants was mandatory before healing abutments were connected at the time of implant placement. Implant overdentures and their respective matrices were inserted following a standard 12‐week healing period. Data relating to mobility tests, radiographs, and peri‐implant parameters were documented at 12, 16, and 52 weeks after surgery. Results: A success rate of 95.8% for the Steri‐Oss and 100% for the Southern Implants was found, without any statistically significant differences in the marginal bone loss. Significant changes in Periotest values were observed for both types between 12 and 52 weeks (p >.001). Minor changes were observed in the peri‐implant parameters evaluated. Conclusions: These preliminary findings show a successful application of this one‐stage approach for unsplinted implants supporting mandibular overdentures with Steri‐Oss and Southern Implant Systems.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>254</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1864</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount><score>9.326</score><pdfWordCount>4326</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>28723</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>576 x 792 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>One‐Stage Operative Procedure Using Two Different Implant Systems: A Prospective Study on Implant Overdentures in the Edentulous Mandible</title><pmid><json:string>11887655</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><pages><first>185</first><last>193</last><total>9</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2001</json:string><json:string>19S</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Orion Corp., Helsinki, Finland</json:string><json:string>Relaled Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>B Laboratories</json:string><json:string>BC Decker Inc</json:string><json:string>Southern Implants, Ltd.</json:string><json:string>Southern Implant Systems</json:string><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>CORP</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago</json:string><json:string>Southern Implants Ltd., Europe, London, UK</json:string><json:string>University of Otago</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral Rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>Department of Stomatology</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral Health, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand Reprint</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Rohana Kumara</json:string><json:string>G.T. Payne</json:string><json:string>Sample</json:string><json:string>W. Murray</json:string><json:string>P.O. Box</json:string><json:string>Andrew Tawse-Smith</json:string><json:string>Bone</json:string><json:string>Southern</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Konstanz</json:string><json:string>Dunedin</json:string><json:string>Brussels</json:string><json:string>South Africa</json:string><json:string>New Zealand</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-P3KBXFBH-8</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string><json:string>4 - otorhinolaryngologie. stomatologie</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2001</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2001</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00140.x</json:string></doi><id>100E8C200B566B3A5EA38136796E9774F1555BB9</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/100E8C200B566B3A5EA38136796E9774F1555BB9/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/100E8C200B566B3A5EA38136796E9774F1555BB9/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/100E8C200B566B3A5EA38136796E9774F1555BB9/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">One‐Stage Operative Procedure Using Two Different Implant Systems: A Prospective Study on Implant Overdentures in the Edentulous Mandible</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2001-10"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">One‐Stage Operative Procedure Using Two Different Implant Systems: A Prospective Study on Implant Overdentures in the Edentulous Mandible</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Andrew</forename><surname>Tawse‐Smith</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, Cert Perio (Göteborg)</roleName></persName><affiliation>Lecturer, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand<address><country key="NZ"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Reprint requests: Andrew Tawse‐Smith, DDS, Cert Perio (Göteborg), Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, P.O. Box 647, Dunedin, New Zealand; e‐mail: andrew.tawse‐smith@stonebow.otago.ac.nz</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Alan G.T.</forename><surname>Payne</surname><roleName type="degree">BDS, MDent, FCD(SA)</roleName></persName><affiliation>Lecturer, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand<address><country key="NZ"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Rohana</forename><surname>Kumara</surname><roleName type="degree">BDS, FDSRCPS, FFDRCS, FDSRCS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand<address><country key="NZ"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">W. Murray</forename><surname>Thomson</surname><roleName type="degree">BDS, MComDent, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral Health, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand<address><country key="NZ"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">100E8C200B566B3A5EA38136796E9774F1555BB9</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-P3KBXFBH-8</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00140.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID185</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID185.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2001.3.issue-4</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="185">185</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="193">193</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2001-10"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p>
<hi rend="italic">Background</hi>: Evidence‐based reports are needed to support the application of a one‐stage surgical protocol for unsplinted implants supporting mandibular overdentures.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Purpose</hi>: To examine the feasibility and success of using two different dental implant systems (originally designed for two‐stage operative technique) using a one‐stage operative procedure in patients being rehabilitated with implant mandibular overdentures.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Materials and Methods</hi>: The study sample involved 24 edentulous subjects (aged 55–80 yr) randomly allocated to two different implant systems, one with a machined titanium implant surface (Steri‐Oss, Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden) and the other with a roughened titanium surface (Southern Implants, Ltd., Irene, South Africa). Two unsplinted implants to support implant overdentures were placed in the anterior mandible of all patients, using a standardized one‐stage surgical and prosthodontic procedure. Primary stability and bicortical anchorage of the implants was mandatory before healing abutments were connected at the time of implant placement. Implant overdentures and their respective matrices were inserted following a standard 12‐week healing period. Data relating to mobility tests, radiographs, and peri‐implant parameters were documented at 12, 16, and 52 weeks after surgery.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Results</hi>: A success rate of 95.8% for the Steri‐Oss and 100% for the Southern Implants was found, without any statistically significant differences in the marginal bone loss. Significant changes in Periotest values were observed for both types between 12 and 52 weeks (p <.001). Minor changes were observed in the peri‐implant parameters evaluated.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Conclusions</hi>: These preliminary findings show a successful application of this one‐stage approach for unsplinted implants supporting mandibular overdentures with Steri‐Oss and Southern Implant Systems.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">implant surfaces</term><term xml:id="k2">mandibular implant overdentures</term><term xml:id="k3">nonsubmerged</term><term xml:id="k4">one‐stage implants</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/100E8C200B566B3A5EA38136796E9774F1555BB9/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="10004"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.2001.3.issue-4</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="3">3</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="4">4</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2001-10">October 2001</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0018500" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00140.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID185"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="9"></count></countGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2007-02-01"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-02-01"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-13"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-17"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="185">185</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="193">193</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Reprint requests: Andrew Tawse‐Smith, DDS, Cert Perio (Göteborg), Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, P.O. Box 647, Dunedin, New Zealand; e‐mail: <email normalForm="andrew.tawse-smith@stonebow.otago.ac.nz">andrew.tawse‐smith@stonebow.otago.ac.nz</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID185.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="47"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="5"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">One‐Stage Operative Procedure Using Two Different Implant Systems: A Prospective Study on Implant Overdentures in the Edentulous Mandible</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Andrew</givenNames><familyName>Tawse‐Smith</familyName><degrees>DDS, Cert Perio (Göteborg)</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Alan G.T.</givenNames><familyName>Payne</familyName><degrees>BDS, MDent, FCD(SA)</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Rohana</givenNames><familyName>Kumara</familyName><degrees>BDS, FDSRCPS, FFDRCS, FDSRCS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>W. Murray</givenNames><familyName>Thomson</familyName><degrees>BDS, MComDent, PhD</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="NZ"><unparsedAffiliation>Lecturer, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="NZ"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="NZ"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Oral Health, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">implant surfaces</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">mandibular implant overdentures</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">nonsubmerged</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">one‐stage implants</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p> <i>Background</i>: Evidence‐based reports are needed to support the application of a one‐stage surgical protocol for unsplinted implants supporting mandibular overdentures.</p><p> <i>Purpose</i>: To examine the feasibility and success of using two different dental implant systems (originally designed for two‐stage operative technique) using a one‐stage operative procedure in patients being rehabilitated with implant mandibular overdentures.</p><p> <i>Materials and Methods</i>: The study sample involved 24 edentulous subjects (aged 55–80 yr) randomly allocated to two different implant systems, one with a machined titanium implant surface (Steri‐Oss, Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden) and the other with a roughened titanium surface (Southern Implants, Ltd., Irene, South Africa). Two unsplinted implants to support implant overdentures were placed in the anterior mandible of all patients, using a standardized one‐stage surgical and prosthodontic procedure. Primary stability and bicortical anchorage of the implants was mandatory before healing abutments were connected at the time of implant placement. Implant overdentures and their respective matrices were inserted following a standard 12‐week healing period. Data relating to mobility tests, radiographs, and peri‐implant parameters were documented at 12, 16, and 52 weeks after surgery.</p><p> <i>Results</i>: A success rate of 95.8% for the Steri‐Oss and 100% for the Southern Implants was found, without any statistically significant differences in the marginal bone loss. Significant changes in Periotest values were observed for both types between 12 and 52 weeks (p <.001). Minor changes were observed in the peri‐implant parameters evaluated.</p><p> <i>Conclusions</i>: These preliminary findings show a successful application of this one‐stage approach for unsplinted implants supporting mandibular overdentures with Steri‐Oss and Southern Implant Systems.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>One‐Stage Operative Procedure Using Two Different Implant Systems: A Prospective Study on Implant Overdentures in the Edentulous Mandible</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>One‐Stage Operative Procedure Using Two Different Implant Systems: A Prospective Study on Implant Overdentures in the Edentulous Mandible</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Andrew</namePart><namePart type="family">Tawse‐Smith</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, Cert Perio (Göteborg)</namePart><affiliation>Lecturer, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: andrew.tawse‐smith@stonebow.otago.ac.nz</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Alan G.T.</namePart><namePart type="family">Payne</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">BDS, MDent, FCD(SA)</namePart><affiliation>Lecturer, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Rohana</namePart><namePart type="family">Kumara</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">BDS, FDSRCPS, FFDRCS, FDSRCS</namePart><affiliation>Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">W. Murray</namePart><namePart type="family">Thomson</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">BDS, MComDent, PhD</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral Health, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2001-10</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2001</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="references">47</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">5</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Background: Evidence‐based reports are needed to support the application of a one‐stage surgical protocol for unsplinted implants supporting mandibular overdentures. Purpose: To examine the feasibility and success of using two different dental implant systems (originally designed for two‐stage operative technique) using a one‐stage operative procedure in patients being rehabilitated with implant mandibular overdentures. Materials and Methods: The study sample involved 24 edentulous subjects (aged 55–80 yr) randomly allocated to two different implant systems, one with a machined titanium implant surface (Steri‐Oss, Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden) and the other with a roughened titanium surface (Southern Implants, Ltd., Irene, South Africa). Two unsplinted implants to support implant overdentures were placed in the anterior mandible of all patients, using a standardized one‐stage surgical and prosthodontic procedure. Primary stability and bicortical anchorage of the implants was mandatory before healing abutments were connected at the time of implant placement. Implant overdentures and their respective matrices were inserted following a standard 12‐week healing period. Data relating to mobility tests, radiographs, and peri‐implant parameters were documented at 12, 16, and 52 weeks after surgery. Results: A success rate of 95.8% for the Steri‐Oss and 100% for the Southern Implants was found, without any statistically significant differences in the marginal bone loss. Significant changes in Periotest values were observed for both types between 12 and 52 weeks (p <.001). Minor changes were observed in the peri‐implant parameters evaluated. Conclusions: These preliminary findings show a successful application of this one‐stage approach for unsplinted implants supporting mandibular overdentures with Steri‐Oss and Southern Implant Systems.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>implant surfaces</topic><topic>mandibular implant overdentures</topic><topic>nonsubmerged</topic><topic>one‐stage implants</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2001</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>3</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>185</start><end>193</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">100E8C200B566B3A5EA38136796E9774F1555BB9</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-P3KBXFBH-8</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00140.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID185</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/100E8C200B566B3A5EA38136796E9774F1555BB9/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000793 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000793 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:100E8C200B566B3A5EA38136796E9774F1555BB9
|texte= One‐Stage Operative Procedure Using Two Different Implant Systems: A Prospective Study on Implant Overdentures in the Edentulous Mandible
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |