Effects of traverse length on human perioral directional sensitivity
Identifieur interne : 000756 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000755; suivant : 000757Effects of traverse length on human perioral directional sensitivity
Auteurs : G. K. Essick ; B. L. Whitsel ; P. J. Dolan ; D. G. KellySource :
- Journal of the Neurological Sciences [ 0022-510X ] ; 1989.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Alert monkeys, Awake monkeys, Chapel hill, Choice paradigm, Classical threshold, Clinical evaluation, Clinical studies, Confidence intervals, Correlative psychophysical, Cutaneous, Data points, Different trials, Directional, Directional sensitivity, Dolan, Essick, Experimentwise error rate, Facial, Facial skin, Foramen, Gamma function model, Generalized gamma function, Generalized gamma function model, Hairy skin, High degree, Human perioral, Human subjects, Hypoesthetic region, Inferior border, Mandibular, Measures analysis, Mental foramen, Mental nerve, Modal velocity, Multiple range test, Neurological damage, Neurologically, Neuron, Neurophysiol, Neurosensory deficits, Normal subjects, Optimal velocity, Oral maxillofacial surg, Oral maxillofacial surgeons, Other skin sites, Parameter estimates, Peak sensitivity, Pergamon press, Perioral skin, Present study, Previous study, Previous work, Primary somatosensory, Primary somatosensory cortex, Psychophysical studies, Receptive fields, Same stimulus conditions, Sensory impairment, Small number, Somatic stimuli, Somatosensory, Special issue, Speech motor control, Stimuli move, Stimulus, Stimulus control, Stimulus direction, Stimulus velocity, Subj, Subtle impairment, Tactile, Tactile stimuli, Tactile stimulus movement, Testing sessions, Vermilion border, Whitsel.
- Teeft :
- Alert monkeys, Awake monkeys, Chapel hill, Choice paradigm, Classical threshold, Clinical evaluation, Clinical studies, Confidence intervals, Correlative psychophysical, Cutaneous, Data points, Different trials, Directional, Directional sensitivity, Dolan, Essick, Experimentwise error rate, Facial, Facial skin, Foramen, Gamma function model, Generalized gamma function, Generalized gamma function model, Hairy skin, High degree, Human perioral, Human subjects, Hypoesthetic region, Inferior border, Mandibular, Measures analysis, Mental foramen, Mental nerve, Modal velocity, Multiple range test, Neurological damage, Neurologically, Neuron, Neurophysiol, Neurosensory deficits, Normal subjects, Optimal velocity, Oral maxillofacial surg, Oral maxillofacial surgeons, Other skin sites, Parameter estimates, Peak sensitivity, Pergamon press, Perioral skin, Present study, Previous study, Previous work, Primary somatosensory, Primary somatosensory cortex, Psychophysical studies, Receptive fields, Same stimulus conditions, Sensory impairment, Small number, Somatic stimuli, Somatosensory, Special issue, Speech motor control, Stimuli move, Stimulus, Stimulus control, Stimulus direction, Stimulus velocity, Subj, Subtle impairment, Tactile, Tactile stimuli, Tactile stimulus movement, Testing sessions, Vermilion border, Whitsel.
Abstract
Abstract: The capacity of 8 neurologically healthy adults to distinguish direction of motion on the skin overlying the mental foramen was determined. The velocity, orientation, and the length and width of skin traversed by the moving tactile stimuli were precisely controlled. Directional sensitivity, d′, was found to depend on both stimulus velocity and the length of skin traversed. Since the relationship between d′ and velocity at each traverse length was well described by a generalized gamma function, it was possible to quantitatively characterize the effects of changes in traverse length on the relationship between d′ and velocity. Specifically, peak (i.e., maximal) directional sensitivity increased as the length of skin traversed was increased, yet the velocity which resulted in peak directional sensitivity (i.e., the optimal or modal velocity) remained invariant over the range of traverse lengths investigated (0.35–1.0 cm). The effect of stimulus velocity on directional sensitivity was least at the longest traverse lengths used. The generalized gamma function model fit the relationship between directional sensitivity and velocity equally well at all traverse lengths studied. The results lead us to anticipate that stimuli of the type used in this study should prove valuable for the detection and quantification of disturbances in orofacial tactile spatiotemporal integration in patients with peripheral nerve injury.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0022-510X(89)90188-3
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:0F3B3E3CAE7D5C9564744C26F9791272DB04294ELe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Effects of traverse length on human perioral directional sensitivity</title><author><name sortKey="Essick, G K" sort="Essick, G K" uniqKey="Essick G" first="G. K." last="Essick">G. K. Essick</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC U.S.A.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Whitsel, B L" sort="Whitsel, B L" uniqKey="Whitsel B" first="B. L." last="Whitsel">B. L. Whitsel</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Physiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC U.S.A.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dolan, P J" sort="Dolan, P J" uniqKey="Dolan P" first="P. J." last="Dolan">P. J. Dolan</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC U.S.A.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kelly, D G" sort="Kelly, D G" uniqKey="Kelly D" first="D. G." last="Kelly">D. G. Kelly</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Statistics and Mathematics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC U.S.A.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:0F3B3E3CAE7D5C9564744C26F9791272DB04294E</idno><date when="1989" year="1989">1989</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/0022-510X(89)90188-3</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/0F3B3E3CAE7D5C9564744C26F9791272DB04294E/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000756</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000756</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">Effects of traverse length on human perioral directional sensitivity</title><author><name sortKey="Essick, G K" sort="Essick, G K" uniqKey="Essick G" first="G. K." last="Essick">G. K. Essick</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC U.S.A.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Whitsel, B L" sort="Whitsel, B L" uniqKey="Whitsel B" first="B. L." last="Whitsel">B. L. Whitsel</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Physiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC U.S.A.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dolan, P J" sort="Dolan, P J" uniqKey="Dolan P" first="P. J." last="Dolan">P. J. Dolan</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC U.S.A.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kelly, D G" sort="Kelly, D G" uniqKey="Kelly D" first="D. G." last="Kelly">D. G. Kelly</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Statistics and Mathematics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC U.S.A.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of the Neurological Sciences</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">JNS</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-510X</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1989">1989</date><biblScope unit="volume">93</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2–3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="175">175</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="190">190</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0022-510X</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-510X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Alert monkeys</term><term>Awake monkeys</term><term>Chapel hill</term><term>Choice paradigm</term><term>Classical threshold</term><term>Clinical evaluation</term><term>Clinical studies</term><term>Confidence intervals</term><term>Correlative psychophysical</term><term>Cutaneous</term><term>Data points</term><term>Different trials</term><term>Directional</term><term>Directional sensitivity</term><term>Dolan</term><term>Essick</term><term>Experimentwise error rate</term><term>Facial</term><term>Facial skin</term><term>Foramen</term><term>Gamma function model</term><term>Generalized gamma function</term><term>Generalized gamma function model</term><term>Hairy skin</term><term>High degree</term><term>Human perioral</term><term>Human subjects</term><term>Hypoesthetic region</term><term>Inferior border</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Measures analysis</term><term>Mental foramen</term><term>Mental nerve</term><term>Modal velocity</term><term>Multiple range test</term><term>Neurological damage</term><term>Neurologically</term><term>Neuron</term><term>Neurophysiol</term><term>Neurosensory deficits</term><term>Normal subjects</term><term>Optimal velocity</term><term>Oral maxillofacial surg</term><term>Oral maxillofacial surgeons</term><term>Other skin sites</term><term>Parameter estimates</term><term>Peak sensitivity</term><term>Pergamon press</term><term>Perioral skin</term><term>Present study</term><term>Previous study</term><term>Previous work</term><term>Primary somatosensory</term><term>Primary somatosensory cortex</term><term>Psychophysical studies</term><term>Receptive fields</term><term>Same stimulus conditions</term><term>Sensory impairment</term><term>Small number</term><term>Somatic stimuli</term><term>Somatosensory</term><term>Special issue</term><term>Speech motor control</term><term>Stimuli move</term><term>Stimulus</term><term>Stimulus control</term><term>Stimulus direction</term><term>Stimulus velocity</term><term>Subj</term><term>Subtle impairment</term><term>Tactile</term><term>Tactile stimuli</term><term>Tactile stimulus movement</term><term>Testing sessions</term><term>Vermilion border</term><term>Whitsel</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Alert monkeys</term><term>Awake monkeys</term><term>Chapel hill</term><term>Choice paradigm</term><term>Classical threshold</term><term>Clinical evaluation</term><term>Clinical studies</term><term>Confidence intervals</term><term>Correlative psychophysical</term><term>Cutaneous</term><term>Data points</term><term>Different trials</term><term>Directional</term><term>Directional sensitivity</term><term>Dolan</term><term>Essick</term><term>Experimentwise error rate</term><term>Facial</term><term>Facial skin</term><term>Foramen</term><term>Gamma function model</term><term>Generalized gamma function</term><term>Generalized gamma function model</term><term>Hairy skin</term><term>High degree</term><term>Human perioral</term><term>Human subjects</term><term>Hypoesthetic region</term><term>Inferior border</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Measures analysis</term><term>Mental foramen</term><term>Mental nerve</term><term>Modal velocity</term><term>Multiple range test</term><term>Neurological damage</term><term>Neurologically</term><term>Neuron</term><term>Neurophysiol</term><term>Neurosensory deficits</term><term>Normal subjects</term><term>Optimal velocity</term><term>Oral maxillofacial surg</term><term>Oral maxillofacial surgeons</term><term>Other skin sites</term><term>Parameter estimates</term><term>Peak sensitivity</term><term>Pergamon press</term><term>Perioral skin</term><term>Present study</term><term>Previous study</term><term>Previous work</term><term>Primary somatosensory</term><term>Primary somatosensory cortex</term><term>Psychophysical studies</term><term>Receptive fields</term><term>Same stimulus conditions</term><term>Sensory impairment</term><term>Small number</term><term>Somatic stimuli</term><term>Somatosensory</term><term>Special issue</term><term>Speech motor control</term><term>Stimuli move</term><term>Stimulus</term><term>Stimulus control</term><term>Stimulus direction</term><term>Stimulus velocity</term><term>Subj</term><term>Subtle impairment</term><term>Tactile</term><term>Tactile stimuli</term><term>Tactile stimulus movement</term><term>Testing sessions</term><term>Vermilion border</term><term>Whitsel</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: The capacity of 8 neurologically healthy adults to distinguish direction of motion on the skin overlying the mental foramen was determined. The velocity, orientation, and the length and width of skin traversed by the moving tactile stimuli were precisely controlled. Directional sensitivity, d′, was found to depend on both stimulus velocity and the length of skin traversed. Since the relationship between d′ and velocity at each traverse length was well described by a generalized gamma function, it was possible to quantitatively characterize the effects of changes in traverse length on the relationship between d′ and velocity. Specifically, peak (i.e., maximal) directional sensitivity increased as the length of skin traversed was increased, yet the velocity which resulted in peak directional sensitivity (i.e., the optimal or modal velocity) remained invariant over the range of traverse lengths investigated (0.35–1.0 cm). The effect of stimulus velocity on directional sensitivity was least at the longest traverse lengths used. The generalized gamma function model fit the relationship between directional sensitivity and velocity equally well at all traverse lengths studied. The results lead us to anticipate that stimuli of the type used in this study should prove valuable for the detection and quantification of disturbances in orofacial tactile spatiotemporal integration in patients with peripheral nerve injury.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>essick</json:string><json:string>directional sensitivity</json:string><json:string>whitsel</json:string><json:string>subj</json:string><json:string>cutaneous</json:string><json:string>somatosensory</json:string><json:string>tactile stimuli</json:string><json:string>neurologically</json:string><json:string>foramen</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>neurophysiol</json:string><json:string>stimulus velocity</json:string><json:string>mental foramen</json:string><json:string>tactile</json:string><json:string>facial skin</json:string><json:string>measures analysis</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>peak sensitivity</json:string><json:string>special issue</json:string><json:string>modal velocity</json:string><json:string>awake monkeys</json:string><json:string>neuron</json:string><json:string>data points</json:string><json:string>high degree</json:string><json:string>other skin sites</json:string><json:string>multiple range test</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofacial surg</json:string><json:string>somatic stimuli</json:string><json:string>generalized gamma function</json:string><json:string>dolan</json:string><json:string>hairy skin</json:string><json:string>choice paradigm</json:string><json:string>receptive fields</json:string><json:string>gamma function model</json:string><json:string>small number</json:string><json:string>perioral skin</json:string><json:string>classical threshold</json:string><json:string>mental nerve</json:string><json:string>parameter estimates</json:string><json:string>previous study</json:string><json:string>inferior border</json:string><json:string>testing sessions</json:string><json:string>stimuli move</json:string><json:string>experimentwise error rate</json:string><json:string>normal subjects</json:string><json:string>clinical evaluation</json:string><json:string>sensory impairment</json:string><json:string>previous work</json:string><json:string>different trials</json:string><json:string>stimulus direction</json:string><json:string>optimal velocity</json:string><json:string>chapel hill</json:string><json:string>hypoesthetic region</json:string><json:string>subtle impairment</json:string><json:string>stimulus control</json:string><json:string>clinical studies</json:string><json:string>same stimulus conditions</json:string><json:string>confidence intervals</json:string><json:string>psychophysical studies</json:string><json:string>vermilion border</json:string><json:string>primary somatosensory cortex</json:string><json:string>human perioral</json:string><json:string>neurological damage</json:string><json:string>alert monkeys</json:string><json:string>neurosensory deficits</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofacial surgeons</json:string><json:string>tactile stimulus movement</json:string><json:string>human subjects</json:string><json:string>correlative psychophysical</json:string><json:string>generalized gamma function model</json:string><json:string>speech motor control</json:string><json:string>primary somatosensory</json:string><json:string>pergamon press</json:string><json:string>stimulus</json:string><json:string>facial</json:string><json:string>directional</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>G.K. Essick</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthodontics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC U.S.A.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>B.L. Whitsel</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Physiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC U.S.A.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>P.J. Dolan</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC U.S.A.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>D.G. Kelly</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Statistics and Mathematics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC U.S.A.</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Facial</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Tactile</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Sensitivity</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Direction</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Motion</value></json:item></subject><arkIstex>ark:/67375/6H6-50LLGL8X-Q</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>Review article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: The capacity of 8 neurologically healthy adults to distinguish direction of motion on the skin overlying the mental foramen was determined. The velocity, orientation, and the length and width of skin traversed by the moving tactile stimuli were precisely controlled. Directional sensitivity, d′, was found to depend on both stimulus velocity and the length of skin traversed. Since the relationship between d′ and velocity at each traverse length was well described by a generalized gamma function, it was possible to quantitatively characterize the effects of changes in traverse length on the relationship between d′ and velocity. Specifically, peak (i.e., maximal) directional sensitivity increased as the length of skin traversed was increased, yet the velocity which resulted in peak directional sensitivity (i.e., the optimal or modal velocity) remained invariant over the range of traverse lengths investigated (0.35–1.0 cm). The effect of stimulus velocity on directional sensitivity was least at the longest traverse lengths used. The generalized gamma function model fit the relationship between directional sensitivity and velocity equally well at all traverse lengths studied. The results lead us to anticipate that stimuli of the type used in this study should prove valuable for the detection and quantification of disturbances in orofacial tactile spatiotemporal integration in patients with peripheral nerve injury.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>210</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1441</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount><score>9.52</score><pdfWordCount>5844</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>34197</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>16</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>504 x 720 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>Effects of traverse length on human perioral directional sensitivity</title><pmid><json:string>2592982</json:string></pmid><pii><json:string>0022-510X(89)90188-3</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>review-article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of the Neurological Sciences</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><publicationDate>1989</publicationDate><issn><json:string>0022-510X</json:string></issn><pii><json:string>S0022-510X(00)X0429-7</json:string></pii><volume>93</volume><issue>2–3</issue><pages><first>175</first><last>190</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1989</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>SAS Institute Inc</json:string><json:string>Dental Research Center</json:string><json:string>U</json:string><json:string>National Institute of Dental Research</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder><json:string>U</json:string><json:string>National Institute of Dental Research</json:string></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>P.J. Dolan</json:string><json:string>U.S.A. Telephone</json:string><json:string>G.K. Essick</json:string><json:string>D.G. Kelly</json:string><json:string>B.L. Whitsel</json:string><json:string>Dreyer</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>NC</json:string><json:string>U.S.</json:string><json:string>Velocity</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Accepted 23 May, 1989</json:string><json:string>Essick and Whitsel 1983, 1985b</json:string><json:string>see Moberg 1962, 1975</json:string><json:string>Whitsel et al. 1979</json:string><json:string>Warren et al. 1986a,b</json:string><json:string>Received 24 November, 1988</json:string><json:string>Franzen et al. 1984</json:string><json:string>Essick et al. (1988a)</json:string><json:string>Essick and Whitsel 1985b</json:string><json:string>Dolan et al. 1987b</json:string><json:string>Essick and Whitsel 1985a</json:string><json:string>Bender et al. 1982</json:string><json:string>Lund 1985</json:string><json:string>Dolan et al. 1987a</json:string><json:string>Zaytoun et al. 1986</json:string><json:string>Ringel and Steer 1963</json:string><json:string>Gourevitch and Galanter 1967</json:string><json:string>Essick and Whitsel 1985a,b, 1988</json:string><json:string>Gardner et al. 1988</json:string><json:string>Essick et al. 1989</json:string><json:string>Essick et al. 1987, 1988a,b</json:string><json:string>Essick and Whitsel 1985a,b</json:string><json:string>Evarts 1982</json:string><json:string>McMillian and Essick 1988</json:string><json:string>McCroskey 1958</json:string><json:string>Dreyer et al.</json:string><json:string>Barlow 1987</json:string><json:string>Poppen 1980</json:string><json:string>Walter and Gregg 1979</json:string><json:string>Seddon 1954</json:string><json:string>Frost et al. 1982</json:string><json:string>Essick et al. 1988a</json:string><json:string>Barlow and Farley 1989</json:string><json:string>Gardner and Sklar 1986</json:string><json:string>Essick et al. 1987</json:string><json:string>Lubker and Gay 1982</json:string><json:string>Essiek and Whitsel 1983, 1985b</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/6H6-50LLGL8X-Q</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - neurosciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical neurology</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - Clinical Neurology</json:string><json:string>1 - Life Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Neuroscience</json:string><json:string>3 - Neurology</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences biologiques fondamentales et appliquees. psychologie</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1989</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1989</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1016/0022-510X(89)90188-3</json:string></doi><id>0F3B3E3CAE7D5C9564744C26F9791272DB04294E</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0F3B3E3CAE7D5C9564744C26F9791272DB04294E/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0F3B3E3CAE7D5C9564744C26F9791272DB04294E/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/0F3B3E3CAE7D5C9564744C26F9791272DB04294E/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">Effects of traverse length on human perioral directional sensitivity</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>ELSEVIER</p></availability><date>1989</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content">Section title: Review article</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">Effects of traverse length on human perioral directional sensitivity</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">G.K.</forename><surname>Essick</surname></persName><note type="correspondence"><p>Correspondence to: G.K. Essick, DDS, PhD, 02 Dental Research Center 210H, CB No. 7455, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7455, U.S.A. Telephone (919)966-5680.</p></note><affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC U.S.A.</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">B.L.</forename><surname>Whitsel</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Physiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC U.S.A.</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">P.J.</forename><surname>Dolan</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC U.S.A.</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">D.G.</forename><surname>Kelly</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Statistics and Mathematics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC U.S.A.</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">0F3B3E3CAE7D5C9564744C26F9791272DB04294E</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/0022-510X(89)90188-3</idno><idno type="PII">0022-510X(89)90188-3</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Journal of the Neurological Sciences</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">JNS</title><idno type="pISSN">0022-510X</idno><idno type="PII">S0022-510X(00)X0429-7</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1989"></date><biblScope unit="volume">93</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2–3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="175">175</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="190">190</biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1989</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The capacity of 8 neurologically healthy adults to distinguish direction of motion on the skin overlying the mental foramen was determined. The velocity, orientation, and the length and width of skin traversed by the moving tactile stimuli were precisely controlled. Directional sensitivity, d′, was found to depend on both stimulus velocity and the length of skin traversed. Since the relationship between d′ and velocity at each traverse length was well described by a generalized gamma function, it was possible to quantitatively characterize the effects of changes in traverse length on the relationship between d′ and velocity. Specifically, peak (i.e., maximal) directional sensitivity increased as the length of skin traversed was increased, yet the velocity which resulted in peak directional sensitivity (i.e., the optimal or modal velocity) remained invariant over the range of traverse lengths investigated (0.35–1.0 cm). The effect of stimulus velocity on directional sensitivity was least at the longest traverse lengths used. The generalized gamma function model fit the relationship between directional sensitivity and velocity equally well at all traverse lengths studied. The results lead us to anticipate that stimuli of the type used in this study should prove valuable for the detection and quantification of disturbances in orofacial tactile spatiotemporal integration in patients with peripheral nerve injury.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Keywords</head><item><term>Facial</term></item><item><term>Tactile</term></item><item><term>Sensitivity</term></item><item><term>Direction</term></item><item><term>Motion</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1989-05-23">Modified</change><change when="1989">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0F3B3E3CAE7D5C9564744C26F9791272DB04294E/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier, elements deleted: tail"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 4.5.2//EN//XML" URI="art452.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><converted-article version="4.5.2" docsubtype="rev"><item-info><jid>JNS</jid><aid>89901883</aid><ce:pii>0022-510X(89)90188-3</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1016/0022-510X(89)90188-3</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="unknown" year="1989"></ce:copyright></item-info><head><ce:dochead><ce:textfn>Review article</ce:textfn></ce:dochead><ce:title>Effects of traverse length on human perioral directional sensitivity</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>G.K.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Essick</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="COR1"><ce:sup>a</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF1"><ce:sup>1</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>B.L.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Whitsel</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF2"><ce:sup>2</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>P.J.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Dolan</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF3"><ce:sup>3</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>D.G.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Kelly</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF4"><ce:sup>4</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:affiliation id="AFF1"><ce:label>1</ce:label><ce:textfn>Department of Prosthodontics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC U.S.A.</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:affiliation id="AFF2"><ce:label>2</ce:label><ce:textfn>Department of Physiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC U.S.A.</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:affiliation id="AFF3"><ce:label>3</ce:label><ce:textfn>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC U.S.A.</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:affiliation id="AFF4"><ce:label>4</ce:label><ce:textfn>Department of Statistics and Mathematics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC U.S.A.</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:correspondence id="COR1"><ce:label>a</ce:label><ce:text>Correspondence to: G.K. Essick, DDS, PhD, 02 Dental Research Center 210H, CB No. 7455, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7455, U.S.A. Telephone (919)966-5680.</ce:text></ce:correspondence></ce:author-group><ce:date-received day="24" month="11" year="1988"></ce:date-received><ce:date-revised day="23" month="5" year="1989"></ce:date-revised><ce:date-accepted day="26" month="5" year="1989"></ce:date-accepted><ce:abstract><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para>The capacity of 8 neurologically healthy adults to distinguish direction of motion on the skin overlying the mental foramen was determined. The velocity, orientation, and the length and width of skin traversed by the moving tactile stimuli were precisely controlled. Directional sensitivity, <ce:italic>d</ce:italic>′, was found to depend on both stimulus velocity and the length of skin traversed. Since the relationship between <ce:italic>d</ce:italic>′ and velocity at each traverse length was well described by a generalized gamma function, it was possible to quantitatively characterize the effects of changes in traverse length on the relationship between <ce:italic>d</ce:italic>′ and velocity. Specifically, peak (i.e., maximal) directional sensitivity increased as the length of skin traversed was increased, yet the velocity which resulted in peak directional sensitivity (i.e., the optimal or modal velocity) remained invariant over the range of traverse lengths investigated (0.35–1.0 cm). The effect of stimulus velocity on directional sensitivity was least at the longest traverse lengths used. The generalized gamma function model fit the relationship between directional sensitivity and velocity equally well at all traverse lengths studied. The results lead us to anticipate that stimuli of the type used in this study should prove valuable for the detection and quantification of disturbances in orofacial tactile spatiotemporal integration in patients with peripheral nerve injury.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract><ce:keywords><ce:section-title>Keywords</ce:section-title><ce:keyword><ce:text>Facial</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Tactile</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Sensitivity</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Direction</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Motion</ce:text></ce:keyword></ce:keywords></head></converted-article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>Effects of traverse length on human perioral directional sensitivity</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>Effects of traverse length on human perioral directional sensitivity</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">G.K.</namePart><namePart type="family">Essick</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC U.S.A.</affiliation><description>Correspondence to: G.K. Essick, DDS, PhD, 02 Dental Research Center 210H, CB No. 7455, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7455, U.S.A. Telephone (919)966-5680.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">B.L.</namePart><namePart type="family">Whitsel</namePart><affiliation>Department of Physiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC U.S.A.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">P.J.</namePart><namePart type="family">Dolan</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC U.S.A.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">D.G.</namePart><namePart type="family">Kelly</namePart><affiliation>Department of Statistics and Mathematics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC U.S.A.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="review-article" displayLabel="Review article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-L5L7X3NF-P">review-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1989</dateIssued><dateModified encoding="w3cdtf">1989-05-23</dateModified><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1989</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><abstract lang="en">Abstract: The capacity of 8 neurologically healthy adults to distinguish direction of motion on the skin overlying the mental foramen was determined. The velocity, orientation, and the length and width of skin traversed by the moving tactile stimuli were precisely controlled. Directional sensitivity, d′, was found to depend on both stimulus velocity and the length of skin traversed. Since the relationship between d′ and velocity at each traverse length was well described by a generalized gamma function, it was possible to quantitatively characterize the effects of changes in traverse length on the relationship between d′ and velocity. Specifically, peak (i.e., maximal) directional sensitivity increased as the length of skin traversed was increased, yet the velocity which resulted in peak directional sensitivity (i.e., the optimal or modal velocity) remained invariant over the range of traverse lengths investigated (0.35–1.0 cm). The effect of stimulus velocity on directional sensitivity was least at the longest traverse lengths used. The generalized gamma function model fit the relationship between directional sensitivity and velocity equally well at all traverse lengths studied. The results lead us to anticipate that stimuli of the type used in this study should prove valuable for the detection and quantification of disturbances in orofacial tactile spatiotemporal integration in patients with peripheral nerve injury.</abstract><note type="content">Section title: Review article</note><subject><genre>Keywords</genre><topic>Facial</topic><topic>Tactile</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Direction</topic><topic>Motion</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of the Neurological Sciences</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>JNS</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">198911</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0022-510X</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0022-510X(00)X0429-7</identifier><part><date>198911</date><detail type="volume"><number>93</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>2–3</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue-pages"><start>129</start><end>358</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>175</start><end>190</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">0F3B3E3CAE7D5C9564744C26F9791272DB04294E</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/6H6-50LLGL8X-Q</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1016/0022-510X(89)90188-3</identifier><identifier type="PII">0022-510X(89)90188-3</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-HKKZVM7B-M">elsevier</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0F3B3E3CAE7D5C9564744C26F9791272DB04294E/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000756 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000756 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:0F3B3E3CAE7D5C9564744C26F9791272DB04294E
|texte= Effects of traverse length on human perioral directional sensitivity
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |