Comparison of speech intelligibility, articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour in subjects with single‐tooth implants, fixed implant prosthetics or conventional removable prostheses
Identifieur interne : 000708 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000707; suivant : 000709Comparison of speech intelligibility, articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour in subjects with single‐tooth implants, fixed implant prosthetics or conventional removable prostheses
Auteurs : K. Van Lierde ; H. Browaeys ; P. Corthals ; P. Mussche ; E. Van Kerkhoven ; H. De BruynSource :
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2012-04.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Acoustic, Acoustic analysis, Acoustic parameters, Aesthetic zone, Alveolar fricative, Anterior implants, Articulation, Articulation disorders, Behaviour, Blackwell publishing, Bruyn, Central incisors, Centre, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Consensus evaluation, Control group, Correct dentition, Dent, Dental implants, Dental replacement, Dental replacements, Dental school, Dental treatment, Dutch language, Dutch version, Edentulous maxilla, Folia phoniatrica, Fourier spectrum, Frequency continuum, Frication, Fricative, Further research, Gent, Implant, Implant prosthesis, Implant prosthesis group, Implant prosthetics, Intelligibility, Kurtosis, Logopaedic assessment, Mandible, Mandibular prostheses, Maxilla, More consonants, More subjects, Norm speakers, Normal speech intelligibility, Oral rehabil, Oral rehabilitation, Oromyofunctional, Oromyofunctional behavior, Oromyofunctional behaviour, Oromyofunctional disorders, Osseointegrated implants, Overall satisfaction, Overall speech intelligibility, Patient satisfaction, Peak frequency value, Perceptual evaluation, Phonetic, Phonetic analyses, Phonetic characteristics, Phonetic disorder, Phonetic disorders, Phonetic inventory, Prosthesis, Range months, Range years, Removable, Removable appliances, Removable dentures, Removable prosthesis group, Sample outcome, Sigmatism, Sigmatism stridens, Single implants, Skewness, Slight production, Sound pressure level, Special attention, Spectral analyses, Spectral moments, Speech assessments, Speech characteristics, Speech intelligibility, Speech language pathologists, Speech problem, Speech sample, Speech samples, Standard deviation, Subjective assessment techniques, Subjective evaluation, Tongue function, Tongue position, University gent, Upper alveolus, Visual analogue scale, Whistle sound.
- Teeft :
- Acoustic, Acoustic analysis, Acoustic parameters, Aesthetic zone, Alveolar fricative, Anterior implants, Articulation, Articulation disorders, Behaviour, Blackwell publishing, Bruyn, Central incisors, Centre, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Consensus evaluation, Control group, Correct dentition, Dent, Dental implants, Dental replacement, Dental replacements, Dental school, Dental treatment, Dutch language, Dutch version, Edentulous maxilla, Folia phoniatrica, Fourier spectrum, Frequency continuum, Frication, Fricative, Further research, Gent, Implant, Implant prosthesis, Implant prosthesis group, Implant prosthetics, Intelligibility, Kurtosis, Logopaedic assessment, Mandible, Mandibular prostheses, Maxilla, More consonants, More subjects, Norm speakers, Normal speech intelligibility, Oral rehabil, Oral rehabilitation, Oromyofunctional, Oromyofunctional behavior, Oromyofunctional behaviour, Oromyofunctional disorders, Osseointegrated implants, Overall satisfaction, Overall speech intelligibility, Patient satisfaction, Peak frequency value, Perceptual evaluation, Phonetic, Phonetic analyses, Phonetic characteristics, Phonetic disorder, Phonetic disorders, Phonetic inventory, Prosthesis, Range months, Range years, Removable, Removable appliances, Removable dentures, Removable prosthesis group, Sample outcome, Sigmatism, Sigmatism stridens, Single implants, Skewness, Slight production, Sound pressure level, Special attention, Spectral analyses, Spectral moments, Speech assessments, Speech characteristics, Speech intelligibility, Speech language pathologists, Speech problem, Speech sample, Speech samples, Standard deviation, Subjective assessment techniques, Subjective evaluation, Tongue function, Tongue position, University gent, Upper alveolus, Visual analogue scale, Whistle sound.
Abstract
Summary The purpose of this controlled study was to determine the impact of a single‐tooth implant, fixed implant prosthesis and completely removable dental prosthesis on intelligibility, articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour. Additionally, the self‐perceived overall satisfaction of the dental replacements and the effect on speech was questioned. Objective (acoustic analysis) as well as subjective assessment techniques (perceptual evaluation) were used. The satisfaction of single‐tooth implant group was very high (100%) followed by a satisfaction of 87% for the fixed implant prosthesis group and 68% for the removable prosthesis group. The results of the phonetic analyses revealed a normal intelligibility and oromyofunctional behaviour in the three groups of dental replacements. Only one type of articulation disorders was observed in the single‐tooth implant group, followed by three types of disorders in the removable prosthesis group and six types of disorders in the fixed implant prosthesis group. In this last group, not only 87% of the subjects showed distortions of one or more consonants but also most consonants of the Dutch language were disturbed in comparison with the single‐tooth implant and removable prosthesis users. Special attention must be paid to the fricative /s/ because in more than 50% of all groups, this sound is disturbed.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02282.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:0E7A5AA67A92442DF99559274C123A8D23529208Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of speech intelligibility, articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour in subjects with single‐tooth implants, fixed implant prosthetics or conventional removable prostheses</title><author><name sortKey="Van Lierde, K" sort="Van Lierde, K" uniqKey="Van Lierde K" first="K." last="Van Lierde">K. Van Lierde</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Logopaedics and Audiology, University Gent, Gent</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Browaeys, H" sort="Browaeys, H" uniqKey="Browaeys H" first="H." last="Browaeys">H. Browaeys</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Logopaedics and Audiology, University Gent, Gent</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Gent, University Hospital Gent, Gent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Corthals, P" sort="Corthals, P" uniqKey="Corthals P" first="P." last="Corthals">P. Corthals</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Logopaedics and Audiology, University Gent, Gent</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mussche, P" sort="Mussche, P" uniqKey="Mussche P" first="P." last="Mussche">P. Mussche</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Logopaedics and Audiology, University Gent, Gent</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Kerkhoven, E" sort="Van Kerkhoven, E" uniqKey="Van Kerkhoven E" first="E." last="Van Kerkhoven">E. Van Kerkhoven</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Logopaedics and Audiology, University Gent, Gent</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Bruyn, H" sort="De Bruyn, H" uniqKey="De Bruyn H" first="H." last="De Bruyn">H. De Bruyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Gent, University Hospital Gent, Gent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:0E7A5AA67A92442DF99559274C123A8D23529208</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02282.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/0E7A5AA67A92442DF99559274C123A8D23529208/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000708</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000708</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Comparison of speech intelligibility, articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour in subjects with single‐tooth implants, fixed implant prosthetics or conventional removable prostheses</title><author><name sortKey="Van Lierde, K" sort="Van Lierde, K" uniqKey="Van Lierde K" first="K." last="Van Lierde">K. Van Lierde</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Logopaedics and Audiology, University Gent, Gent</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Browaeys, H" sort="Browaeys, H" uniqKey="Browaeys H" first="H." last="Browaeys">H. Browaeys</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Logopaedics and Audiology, University Gent, Gent</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Gent, University Hospital Gent, Gent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Corthals, P" sort="Corthals, P" uniqKey="Corthals P" first="P." last="Corthals">P. Corthals</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Logopaedics and Audiology, University Gent, Gent</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mussche, P" sort="Mussche, P" uniqKey="Mussche P" first="P." last="Mussche">P. Mussche</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Logopaedics and Audiology, University Gent, Gent</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Kerkhoven, E" sort="Van Kerkhoven, E" uniqKey="Van Kerkhoven E" first="E." last="Van Kerkhoven">E. Van Kerkhoven</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Logopaedics and Audiology, University Gent, Gent</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Bruyn, H" sort="De Bruyn, H" uniqKey="De Bruyn H" first="H." last="De Bruyn">H. De Bruyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Gent, University Hospital Gent, Gent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">39</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="285">285</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="293">293</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-04">2012-04</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acoustic</term><term>Acoustic analysis</term><term>Acoustic parameters</term><term>Aesthetic zone</term><term>Alveolar fricative</term><term>Anterior implants</term><term>Articulation</term><term>Articulation disorders</term><term>Behaviour</term><term>Blackwell publishing</term><term>Bruyn</term><term>Central incisors</term><term>Centre</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Consensus evaluation</term><term>Control group</term><term>Correct dentition</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental replacement</term><term>Dental replacements</term><term>Dental school</term><term>Dental treatment</term><term>Dutch language</term><term>Dutch version</term><term>Edentulous maxilla</term><term>Folia phoniatrica</term><term>Fourier spectrum</term><term>Frequency continuum</term><term>Frication</term><term>Fricative</term><term>Further research</term><term>Gent</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant prosthesis</term><term>Implant prosthesis group</term><term>Implant prosthetics</term><term>Intelligibility</term><term>Kurtosis</term><term>Logopaedic assessment</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular prostheses</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>More consonants</term><term>More subjects</term><term>Norm speakers</term><term>Normal speech intelligibility</term><term>Oral rehabil</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Oromyofunctional</term><term>Oromyofunctional behavior</term><term>Oromyofunctional behaviour</term><term>Oromyofunctional disorders</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Overall satisfaction</term><term>Overall speech intelligibility</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Peak frequency value</term><term>Perceptual evaluation</term><term>Phonetic</term><term>Phonetic analyses</term><term>Phonetic characteristics</term><term>Phonetic disorder</term><term>Phonetic disorders</term><term>Phonetic inventory</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Range months</term><term>Range years</term><term>Removable</term><term>Removable appliances</term><term>Removable dentures</term><term>Removable prosthesis group</term><term>Sample outcome</term><term>Sigmatism</term><term>Sigmatism stridens</term><term>Single implants</term><term>Skewness</term><term>Slight production</term><term>Sound pressure level</term><term>Special attention</term><term>Spectral analyses</term><term>Spectral moments</term><term>Speech assessments</term><term>Speech characteristics</term><term>Speech intelligibility</term><term>Speech language pathologists</term><term>Speech problem</term><term>Speech sample</term><term>Speech samples</term><term>Standard deviation</term><term>Subjective assessment techniques</term><term>Subjective evaluation</term><term>Tongue function</term><term>Tongue position</term><term>University gent</term><term>Upper alveolus</term><term>Visual analogue scale</term><term>Whistle sound</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Acoustic</term><term>Acoustic analysis</term><term>Acoustic parameters</term><term>Aesthetic zone</term><term>Alveolar fricative</term><term>Anterior implants</term><term>Articulation</term><term>Articulation disorders</term><term>Behaviour</term><term>Blackwell publishing</term><term>Bruyn</term><term>Central incisors</term><term>Centre</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Consensus evaluation</term><term>Control group</term><term>Correct dentition</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental replacement</term><term>Dental replacements</term><term>Dental school</term><term>Dental treatment</term><term>Dutch language</term><term>Dutch version</term><term>Edentulous maxilla</term><term>Folia phoniatrica</term><term>Fourier spectrum</term><term>Frequency continuum</term><term>Frication</term><term>Fricative</term><term>Further research</term><term>Gent</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant prosthesis</term><term>Implant prosthesis group</term><term>Implant prosthetics</term><term>Intelligibility</term><term>Kurtosis</term><term>Logopaedic assessment</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular prostheses</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>More consonants</term><term>More subjects</term><term>Norm speakers</term><term>Normal speech intelligibility</term><term>Oral rehabil</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Oromyofunctional</term><term>Oromyofunctional behavior</term><term>Oromyofunctional behaviour</term><term>Oromyofunctional disorders</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Overall satisfaction</term><term>Overall speech intelligibility</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Peak frequency value</term><term>Perceptual evaluation</term><term>Phonetic</term><term>Phonetic analyses</term><term>Phonetic characteristics</term><term>Phonetic disorder</term><term>Phonetic disorders</term><term>Phonetic inventory</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Range months</term><term>Range years</term><term>Removable</term><term>Removable appliances</term><term>Removable dentures</term><term>Removable prosthesis group</term><term>Sample outcome</term><term>Sigmatism</term><term>Sigmatism stridens</term><term>Single implants</term><term>Skewness</term><term>Slight production</term><term>Sound pressure level</term><term>Special attention</term><term>Spectral analyses</term><term>Spectral moments</term><term>Speech assessments</term><term>Speech characteristics</term><term>Speech intelligibility</term><term>Speech language pathologists</term><term>Speech problem</term><term>Speech sample</term><term>Speech samples</term><term>Standard deviation</term><term>Subjective assessment techniques</term><term>Subjective evaluation</term><term>Tongue function</term><term>Tongue position</term><term>University gent</term><term>Upper alveolus</term><term>Visual analogue scale</term><term>Whistle sound</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Summary The purpose of this controlled study was to determine the impact of a single‐tooth implant, fixed implant prosthesis and completely removable dental prosthesis on intelligibility, articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour. Additionally, the self‐perceived overall satisfaction of the dental replacements and the effect on speech was questioned. Objective (acoustic analysis) as well as subjective assessment techniques (perceptual evaluation) were used. The satisfaction of single‐tooth implant group was very high (100%) followed by a satisfaction of 87% for the fixed implant prosthesis group and 68% for the removable prosthesis group. The results of the phonetic analyses revealed a normal intelligibility and oromyofunctional behaviour in the three groups of dental replacements. Only one type of articulation disorders was observed in the single‐tooth implant group, followed by three types of disorders in the removable prosthesis group and six types of disorders in the fixed implant prosthesis group. In this last group, not only 87% of the subjects showed distortions of one or more consonants but also most consonants of the Dutch language were disturbed in comparison with the single‐tooth implant and removable prosthesis users. Special attention must be paid to the fricative /s/ because in more than 50% of all groups, this sound is disturbed.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>oromyofunctional</json:string><json:string>intelligibility</json:string><json:string>control group</json:string><json:string>standard deviation</json:string><json:string>sigmatism</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>articulation</json:string><json:string>overall satisfaction</json:string><json:string>oromyofunctional behaviour</json:string><json:string>frication</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>dental replacement</json:string><json:string>blackwell publishing</json:string><json:string>removable</json:string><json:string>fricative</json:string><json:string>bruyn</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>gent</json:string><json:string>speech intelligibility</json:string><json:string>dental replacements</json:string><json:string>kurtosis</json:string><json:string>skewness</json:string><json:string>acoustic analysis</json:string><json:string>acoustic</json:string><json:string>speech characteristics</json:string><json:string>range years</json:string><json:string>articulation disorders</json:string><json:string>spectral moments</json:string><json:string>implant prosthetics</json:string><json:string>consensus evaluation</json:string><json:string>phonetic</json:string><json:string>fourier spectrum</json:string><json:string>speech language pathologists</json:string><json:string>upper alveolus</json:string><json:string>folia phoniatrica</json:string><json:string>whistle sound</json:string><json:string>implant prosthesis</json:string><json:string>spectral analyses</json:string><json:string>sample outcome</json:string><json:string>clin implant dent relat</json:string><json:string>further research</json:string><json:string>oromyofunctional behavior</json:string><json:string>acoustic parameters</json:string><json:string>alveolar fricative</json:string><json:string>implant prosthesis group</json:string><json:string>dental treatment</json:string><json:string>normal speech intelligibility</json:string><json:string>removable dentures</json:string><json:string>aesthetic zone</json:string><json:string>overall speech intelligibility</json:string><json:string>patient satisfaction</json:string><json:string>centre</json:string><json:string>behaviour</json:string><json:string>norm speakers</json:string><json:string>logopaedic assessment</json:string><json:string>phonetic characteristics</json:string><json:string>speech assessments</json:string><json:string>dutch version</json:string><json:string>visual analogue scale</json:string><json:string>speech samples</json:string><json:string>speech sample</json:string><json:string>phonetic inventory</json:string><json:string>correct dentition</json:string><json:string>phonetic disorders</json:string><json:string>range months</json:string><json:string>sigmatism stridens</json:string><json:string>speech problem</json:string><json:string>single implants</json:string><json:string>peak frequency value</json:string><json:string>removable appliances</json:string><json:string>tongue function</json:string><json:string>tongue position</json:string><json:string>oromyofunctional disorders</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>edentulous maxilla</json:string><json:string>special attention</json:string><json:string>more subjects</json:string><json:string>phonetic disorder</json:string><json:string>dutch language</json:string><json:string>more consonants</json:string><json:string>frequency continuum</json:string><json:string>phonetic analyses</json:string><json:string>central incisors</json:string><json:string>removable prosthesis group</json:string><json:string>slight production</json:string><json:string>mandibular prostheses</json:string><json:string>sound pressure level</json:string><json:string>perceptual evaluation</json:string><json:string>subjective assessment techniques</json:string><json:string>subjective evaluation</json:string><json:string>dental school</json:string><json:string>university gent</json:string><json:string>oral rehabil</json:string><json:string>anterior implants</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>oral rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>K. VAN LIERDE</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Logopaedics and Audiology, University Gent, Gent</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>H. BROWAEYS</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Logopaedics and Audiology, University Gent, Gent</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Gent, University Hospital Gent, Gent, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>P. CORTHALS</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Logopaedics and Audiology, University Gent, Gent</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>P. MUSSCHE</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Logopaedics and Audiology, University Gent, Gent</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>E. VAN KERKHOVEN</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Logopaedics and Audiology, University Gent, Gent</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>H. DE BRUYN</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Gent, University Hospital Gent, Gent, Belgium</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthodontics, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>single‐tooth implant</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>fixed implant prosthesis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>completely removable dental prosthesis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>speech</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>oromyofunctional behavior</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>articulation</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JOOR2282</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-218T55QV-R</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Summary The purpose of this controlled study was to determine the impact of a single‐tooth implant, fixed implant prosthesis and completely removable dental prosthesis on intelligibility, articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour. Additionally, the self‐perceived overall satisfaction of the dental replacements and the effect on speech was questioned. Objective (acoustic analysis) as well as subjective assessment techniques (perceptual evaluation) were used. The satisfaction of single‐tooth implant group was very high (100%) followed by a satisfaction of 87% for the fixed implant prosthesis group and 68% for the removable prosthesis group. The results of the phonetic analyses revealed a normal intelligibility and oromyofunctional behaviour in the three groups of dental replacements. Only one type of articulation disorders was observed in the single‐tooth implant group, followed by three types of disorders in the removable prosthesis group and six types of disorders in the fixed implant prosthesis group. In this last group, not only 87% of the subjects showed distortions of one or more consonants but also most consonants of the Dutch language were disturbed in comparison with the single‐tooth implant and removable prosthesis users. Special attention must be paid to the fricative /s/ because in more than 50% of all groups, this sound is disturbed.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>9.412</score><pdfWordCount>5104</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>32198</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>201</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1369</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>6</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Comparison of speech intelligibility, articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour in subjects with single‐tooth implants, fixed implant prosthetics or conventional removable prostheses</title><pmid><json:string>22239248</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0305-182X</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1365-2842</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JOOR</json:string></publisherId><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><pages><first>285</first><last>293</last><total>9</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2012</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Department of Prosthodontics, Malmo University, Malmo, Sweden</json:string><json:string>Ghent University</json:string><json:string>University Hospital Gent, Gent, Belgium</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</json:string><json:string>University Hospital of Ghent</json:string><json:string>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</json:string><json:string>Kay Elemetrics</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Peter Coesssens</json:string><json:string>H. Broways</json:string><json:string>Filiep Raes</json:string><json:string>Carien Matthys</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Vermylen et al.</json:string><json:string>Pjetursson et al.</json:string><json:string>Lundqvist et al.</json:string><json:string>Jacobs et al.</json:string><json:string>Vermeylen et al.</json:string><json:string>Lembrechts et al.</json:string><json:string>Pjeturson et al.</json:string><json:string>Dierens et al.</json:string><json:string>Molly et al.</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-218T55QV-R</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02282.x</json:string></doi><id>0E7A5AA67A92442DF99559274C123A8D23529208</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0E7A5AA67A92442DF99559274C123A8D23529208/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0E7A5AA67A92442DF99559274C123A8D23529208/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/0E7A5AA67A92442DF99559274C123A8D23529208/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Comparison of speech intelligibility, articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour in subjects with single‐tooth implants, fixed implant prosthetics or conventional removable prostheses</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2012-04"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Comparison of speech intelligibility, articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour in subjects with single‐tooth implants, fixed implant prosthetics or conventional removable prostheses</title><title level="a" type="short">SPEECH IN SUBJECTS WITH DENTAL REPLACEMENTS</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">K.</forename><surname>VAN LIERDE</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Logopaedics and Audiology, University Gent, Gent</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">H.</forename><surname>BROWAEYS</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Logopaedics and Audiology, University Gent, Gent</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Gent, University Hospital Gent, Gent, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">P.</forename><surname>CORTHALS</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Logopaedics and Audiology, University Gent, Gent</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">P.</forename><surname>MUSSCHE</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Logopaedics and Audiology, University Gent, Gent</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">E.</forename><surname>VAN KERKHOVEN</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Logopaedics and Audiology, University Gent, Gent</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0005"><persName><forename type="first">H.</forename><surname>DE BRUYN</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Gent, University Hospital Gent, Gent, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">0E7A5AA67A92442DF99559274C123A8D23529208</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-218T55QV-R</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02282.x</idno><idno type="unit">JOOR2282</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JOOR.JOOR2282.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="pISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/jor.2012.39.issue-4</idno><idno type="product">JOOR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">39</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="285">285</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="293">293</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-04"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold">Summary </hi> The purpose of this controlled study was to determine the impact of a single‐tooth implant, fixed implant prosthesis and completely removable dental prosthesis on intelligibility, articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour. Additionally, the self‐perceived overall satisfaction of the dental replacements and the effect on speech was questioned. Objective (acoustic analysis) as well as subjective assessment techniques (perceptual evaluation) were used. The satisfaction of single‐tooth implant group was very high (100%) followed by a satisfaction of 87% for the fixed implant prosthesis group and 68% for the removable prosthesis group. The results of the phonetic analyses revealed a normal intelligibility and oromyofunctional behaviour in the three groups of dental replacements. Only one type of articulation disorders was observed in the single‐tooth implant group, followed by three types of disorders in the removable prosthesis group and six types of disorders in the fixed implant prosthesis group. In this last group, not only 87% of the subjects showed distortions of one or more consonants but also most consonants of the Dutch language were disturbed in comparison with the single‐tooth implant and removable prosthesis users. Special attention must be paid to the fricative /s/ because in more than 50% of all groups, this sound is disturbed.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">single‐tooth implant</term><term xml:id="k2">fixed implant prosthesis</term><term xml:id="k3">completely removable dental prosthesis</term><term xml:id="k4">speech</term><term xml:id="k5">oromyofunctional behavior</term><term xml:id="k6">articulation</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0E7A5AA67A92442DF99559274C123A8D23529208/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</doi><issn type="print">0305-182X</issn><issn type="electronic">1365-2842</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JOOR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="04104"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jor.2012.39.issue-4</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="39">39</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="4">4</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-04">April 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="7" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02282.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JOOR2282"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="9"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.1.3 standalone mode:FullText" date="2012-03-05"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2012-01-13"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2012-01-13"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-03-05"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-20"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="285">285</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="293">293</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Kristiane Van Lierde, 2P2 Uz gent, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Gent, Belgium.
E‐mail: <email>Kristiane.vanlierde@ugent.be</email></correspondenceTo><objectNameGroup><objectName elementName="appendix">Appendix</objectName></objectNameGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JOOR.JOOR2282.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication 18 November 2011</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="2"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="2"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Comparison of speech intelligibility, articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour in subjects with single‐tooth implants, fixed implant prosthetics or conventional removable prostheses</title><title type="shortAuthors">K. VAN LIERDE <i>et al.</i></title><title type="short">SPEECH IN SUBJECTS WITH DENTAL REPLACEMENTS</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>K.</givenNames><familyName>VAN LIERDE</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1 #a2"><personName><givenNames>H.</givenNames><familyName>BROWAEYS</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>P.</givenNames><familyName>CORTHALS</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>P.</givenNames><familyName>MUSSCHE</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>E.</givenNames><familyName>VAN KERKHOVEN</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr6" affiliationRef="#a2 #a3"><personName><givenNames>H.</givenNames><familyName>DE BRUYN</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Logopaedics and Audiology, University Gent, Gent</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Gent, University Hospital Gent, Gent, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">single‐tooth implant</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">fixed implant prosthesis</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">completely removable dental prosthesis</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">speech</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">oromyofunctional behavior</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">articulation</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Summary </b> The purpose of this controlled study was to determine the impact of a single‐tooth implant, fixed implant prosthesis and completely removable dental prosthesis on intelligibility, articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour. Additionally, the self‐perceived overall satisfaction of the dental replacements and the effect on speech was questioned. Objective (acoustic analysis) as well as subjective assessment techniques (perceptual evaluation) were used. The satisfaction of single‐tooth implant group was very high (100%) followed by a satisfaction of 87% for the fixed implant prosthesis group and 68% for the removable prosthesis group. The results of the phonetic analyses revealed a normal intelligibility and oromyofunctional behaviour in the three groups of dental replacements. Only one type of articulation disorders was observed in the single‐tooth implant group, followed by three types of disorders in the removable prosthesis group and six types of disorders in the fixed implant prosthesis group. In this last group, not only 87% of the subjects showed distortions of one or more consonants but also most consonants of the Dutch language were disturbed in comparison with the single‐tooth implant and removable prosthesis users. Special attention must be paid to the fricative /s/ because in more than 50% of all groups, this sound is disturbed.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note xml:id="fn1"><p>K. Van Lierde and H. Broways contributed equally to this work.</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Comparison of speech intelligibility, articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour in subjects with single‐tooth implants, fixed implant prosthetics or conventional removable prostheses</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>SPEECH IN SUBJECTS WITH DENTAL REPLACEMENTS</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Comparison of speech intelligibility, articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour in subjects with single‐tooth implants, fixed implant prosthetics or conventional removable prostheses</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">K.</namePart><namePart type="family">VAN LIERDE</namePart><affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Logopaedics and Audiology, University Gent, Gent</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">H.</namePart><namePart type="family">BROWAEYS</namePart><affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Logopaedics and Audiology, University Gent, Gent</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Gent, University Hospital Gent, Gent, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">P.</namePart><namePart type="family">CORTHALS</namePart><affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Logopaedics and Audiology, University Gent, Gent</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">P.</namePart><namePart type="family">MUSSCHE</namePart><affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Logopaedics and Audiology, University Gent, Gent</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">E.</namePart><namePart type="family">VAN KERKHOVEN</namePart><affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Logopaedics and Audiology, University Gent, Gent</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">H.</namePart><namePart type="family">DE BRUYN</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Gent, University Hospital Gent, Gent, Belgium</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-04</dateIssued><edition>Accepted for publication 18 November 2011</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">2</extent><extent unit="tables">2</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Summary The purpose of this controlled study was to determine the impact of a single‐tooth implant, fixed implant prosthesis and completely removable dental prosthesis on intelligibility, articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour. Additionally, the self‐perceived overall satisfaction of the dental replacements and the effect on speech was questioned. Objective (acoustic analysis) as well as subjective assessment techniques (perceptual evaluation) were used. The satisfaction of single‐tooth implant group was very high (100%) followed by a satisfaction of 87% for the fixed implant prosthesis group and 68% for the removable prosthesis group. The results of the phonetic analyses revealed a normal intelligibility and oromyofunctional behaviour in the three groups of dental replacements. Only one type of articulation disorders was observed in the single‐tooth implant group, followed by three types of disorders in the removable prosthesis group and six types of disorders in the fixed implant prosthesis group. In this last group, not only 87% of the subjects showed distortions of one or more consonants but also most consonants of the Dutch language were disturbed in comparison with the single‐tooth implant and removable prosthesis users. Special attention must be paid to the fricative /s/ because in more than 50% of all groups, this sound is disturbed.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>single‐tooth implant</topic><topic>fixed implant prosthesis</topic><topic>completely removable dental prosthesis</topic><topic>speech</topic><topic>oromyofunctional behavior</topic><topic>articulation</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0305-182X</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JOOR</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>39</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>285</start><end>293</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">0E7A5AA67A92442DF99559274C123A8D23529208</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-218T55QV-R</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02282.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JOOR2282</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0E7A5AA67A92442DF99559274C123A8D23529208/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000708 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000708 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:0E7A5AA67A92442DF99559274C123A8D23529208
|texte= Comparison of speech intelligibility, articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour in subjects with single‐tooth implants, fixed implant prosthetics or conventional removable prostheses
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |